Quality control for these erratas has to get better or something 😭 it hurts my very soul and my brain can only handle so many "this card does not play how it reads"
so the thing about "Three Great Angels" is that that actually is an exact translation of the Japanese being used, it's "Angel" that's different, a better translation of the Japanese would be "Angel-Type", because in Japanese a categorizing suffix is added to the end of every trait which encompasses a generalized group, so: "-Type", "-Species", "-Age", and "-Form" are used depending on the trait in question, but for something like "Three great Angels", this is not a generalized group, it's quite literately referring to exactly 3 great angels, so it doesn't get the "-Type" suffix added to the end of its trait.
Aaah, at last! been waiting for this, great video as always, and TYVM. PD: You seem to have mistaken the "related content" of the video, it shows Pokemon TCG.
I think the segment relating to Imperial Fighter Mode is incorrect. The Blitz occurs during the same window as the Turn Players End of Turn effects. In this case, you end of turn DNA evolve using the armor forms, DNA using their inherited effects after digivolving into lv 5, then DNA once more into the Lv 6, and using the When Attacking of the DM blitz effect to attack into DeXmon. DeXmon does not have an effect that would be considered interruptive, so if the DeXmon does indeed survive, then yes it will delete the FM at the End of Turn. Was this ruling declared differently by Bandai?
So say with slayerdramon effect to make an opponents digimon attack, and my opponent has a stun digimon say from howling mem boost, can they still pick the stun
If i have examon and i end my turn , opp turn i make his bwg attack he declares attack with xantibody and digivolves , does his attack resolve before I’m able to suspend and unsuspend myself and suspend his Digimon before his attack goes through
Great videos, love seeing someone taking the time to give us the complicated interaction explanations. I was wondering if there were any resources for, or ways to become a judge? My local meta is lacking in that department I was hoping to be able to step up.
Question about examon when digivolving effects. Both the regular a d DNA portions contain the word may. Am I allowed to say no to the ability to tuck in sources and then only say yes to playing a dramon onto the field?
ähm i know this vid is 9 month old now but why does my Dorbickmon only say´s (5 Digimon cards w/different names + [Dragon] traits ) it is missing text ore something??
Can someone please help me with an interaction. I had a suspended R/P Fightermode with retaliation inherent. My opponent uses Attack of the Heavy Mobile Digimon and plays a EX1 Machinedramon with 5 sources under it. He blitz into my imperial with both of them being 13000DP. How many sources will he lose? My thought would be 4. Two for dying in battle and then 2 more for retaliation. Please help.
Hi! I have a question regarding Examon's line I have an Examon with either Bebydomon (EX3-001) or Dracomon (EX3-037) in its sources, plus some Evade coming from Coredramon or Wingdramon, and my opponent throws a Wyvern's Breath(BT6-101), making it effectively 0DP. After that game rulings try to kill Exa, but then Evade triggers so I suspend Examon, which also triggers both Dracomon and Examon effects (and later on Bebydomon's one after Examon unsuspends), gaining some DP back and avoiding the 0DP line. Does Exa survive? or is it killed before effects resolve (or regardless of them) due to rule processing?
So how it works like Omnimon Blitz protection works, you can protect it to stop the deletion but at the end of the turn it would be deleted because it's at 0, however because Examon does restand and gains through 2k it should live. (But it's just 2k until turn ends)
Evade is interruptive, so Examon suspends, and the effects of Dracomon and Examon trigger, but they don't activate yet. Then Rules Processing tries to delete the Examon again, and it succeeds since it can't Evade since it's suspended. Since Examon's effect never activates, the Bebydomon won't even trigger, as it never unsuspends.
Awesome and informative video! I have a question, I hope you can help me, can I activate the effect of sourai on a digimon that has less than 4 sources of evolution?
i have a question about slayerdramon effect combined with breakdramon suspend effect. when it is my opponent start of main phase and i use slayerdramon effect to suspend breakdramon. does my oppoent first decide with which digimon they attack or does the breakdramon effect to suspend 1 of your opponent digimon first happen?? i see a lot of people doing it different and i am getting confused
Hei I have a question concerning Examon: let's assume I have Examon (with Blocker and evade) and Slayerdramon on the field and I use Slayerdramon (suspending himself) to force my opponent to attack. Here my first question: At what point does Slayerdramon unsuspend? The attack then proceeds and I decide to block with Examon by suspending himself for its Blocker ability. Second question: At what point does Examon unsuspend during combat? Lastly if the attacking Digimon is also 15k and I decided to block with Examon can I unsuspend and use its ability evade to suspend itself again? Sorry for all the questions I want to try the deck but I don't want to cheat anyone.
You are great my man! But I have so many question now about dealing with deathmon !! If you digivolve passing turn and it has an effect to delete a DIGIMON, does DEATHX activate the end of turn before is deleted? What if is blitz swinging over DEATHX, passing turn, does The end of turn activates? What if is Omni x, with x antibody option that allows to digivolve into him (blitz then antibody effect to digivolve into him) does his when digivolving activate to kill the DEATHX before the end of turn effect since already pass the memory? Scenarios passing turn with the blitz and passing turn with the effect of x antibody when digivolves into omni x… please help!
One of those situations is literally presented in the video. Regardless, the End of Turn doesn't happen until all pending effects activate. So Omni X can delete the DeathX.
R0bo, I’ve got a question re Dorbick (D) and the Guil X / Growl X inheritable. D says [OP] delete 1 opposing Mon w 3k DP or less. For each card w Dragon, saur, and Michael Ceratopsian, in one of its traits in D’Souza evo cards ass 2k to the max DP you can choose w this effect. So normally, I have 5 qualifying sources that’s 10k on top of the base 3k for a total of 13k. Similar to the modifying effect of D, Guil X’s inheritable says add 1k to the max DP you can choose with DP based deletion effects. The normal interaction say w the other cards of the Guil tribe add 1k to the main effect. However, w D the max effect I could choose isn’t the initial 3k, it’s the second half which adds 2k for every DSC source (assuming you Xros w more than 1 source). If you’ve read something that answers this Q please let me know. Love the content, and grateful for the guidance. Thanks for taking the time.
I’m still very confused about examons timings when can the once per turn to unsuspend trigger on opponents turn once the attack has been declared or once the attack has landed - it seems to be a huge debate some people say during the when attacking triggers and some people say after the attack has gone through and landed - please help
You finish Slayer's effect before Exa's All Turn effect can go off. Slayer's effect ends when your opponent chooses to attack with something. Example: Slayer effect, suspend exa, opp choose a digi to attack with. That is all slayer does, his effect is over. Now Exa can use his effect because slayer's effect is over to unsuspend and suspend something.
Slayerdramon and breakdramon on board, my opponent has 2 digimon, start of opp main phase, suspend breakdramon from slaydramon effect to force opp to attack, does opp select attacker first, then breakdramon effect to suspend a digimon or would breakdramon suspend something before opp declares attacker? and if so, may they select suspended digimon (from breakdramon effect) to "fizzle" the force swing?
You have to finish resolving slayerdramon fully which includes declaring the attack. Once the attack is declared then breakdramon can resolve its effect.
Say my opponent red/purple imperialdramon(dm) with retaliation attacks by security and I block with examon. Does he restand first so I can use evade or does the attack goes through first before the the unsuspend takes place?
You will unsuspend. Assuming Exa has not unsuspended by his All Turns effect already, after you declare the block and suspend Exa, that will trigger its All Turns effect. You will have to activate the effect to unsuspend before the attack lands since all pending effects have to finish activating before the attack can finish. Then you may use Evade.
Legit question I'm confused on - deathx ability has to resolve before a pending attack happens from imperial I understand. Why with the two slayer example does a pending attack cause the second slayer to fizzle? It was a pending triggered effect like deathx was before imperial attacked
It’s the same situation. DeathX has to activate since it’s pending. The second Slayer has to do the same. But you can’t declare an attack while a current attack is ongoing. So the second Slayer activates without an effect.
@@R0boSushi Question if I attack security with panjyamon x with leomon in its evo sources being the only digimon I have on the field and I hit a gaia force in security can I use the all turns effect to play leomon or is it not considered battle?
This might be a dumb question, but do snowagumon (ex3-016) or paledramon (ex3-019) increase the cost of a jogress if one of the digimon has no sources? If so, is that tax increased if jogress is performed with 2 digimon without sources?
Question. When Imperialdramon FM gets deleted via DeathXmon End of Opponent's Turn effect would it go on to delete the Veemon and Wormmon summoned after from FM on deletion?
I’m confused by the interaction of Death X and imperialdramon play, if you are attacking using blitz and have declared a target, the attack itself should still go through and either check security/ destroy the unsuspended Digimon right ? Then the end of turn effect would activate for DeathXmon but if it’s no longer on the field it cannot activate and the imperialdramon would survive, since you have to still resolve an effect and an attack it’s not the end of turn till the attack step for that Digimon and it’s abilities are resolved right ?
I think the nuance in this situation is that deathX has already activated during the “end of turn” timing with the lv4s ESS. You go all the way up into fighter mode and have declared your attack, but before the battle can commence you have to resolve the deathX which proc’d earlier. The battle of an attack is not part of Blitz effect resolution, the declaration of an attack is.
@@JMoCRAY that is precisely why, both the level 4 and deathX trigger at end of turn but due to turn player priority you get to DNA first and because new triggers are given priority deathx is constantly put at the bottom of the list for its trigger to activate and resolve, meaning that once you go into fighter mode and there are no more new triggers deathX is then able to delete fighter mode
So I had a weird situation the other day with Examon. My field: Examon and Slayerdramon Opponent: Banchostingmon I activate the effect of Slayerdramon, suspend the Examon for the activation cost. What happens next? Does Banchostingmon attack first and can it choose Examon as the target?
Yea you can choose to attack Examon with BanchoStingmon since it is still suspended due to Slayaddamon’s effect. Even if it then unsuspend due to its own effect, the attack is still going through.
hello! i have question regarding Examon's skill with Slayerdramon ess skill effect. so the situation is during opponent turn after hatching or rising phase, the Examon player activate Slayerdramon ess skill effect which is force attack. By suspending Examon, which one come first? opponent attacking due to Slayerdramon ess skill effect or before opponent attack Examon suspending skill activate first? sorry for bad english. hope you understand the situation
The opponent declares the attack as a part of the Slayerdramon ESS, and since Examon is suspended at that time, it is a valid target. The Examon's unsuspends and gets the effects of any Dracomon/Bebydomon before the attack lands, since all effects pending activation activate before the attack goes through.
@@fadzleejunaidi820 The examon's effect will trigger from suspending itself for the slayerdramon effect, but the effect will activate in full before any other effect can activate. So the opponent's digimon will have already suspended itself to declare the attack when Examon's effect gets to activate.
Assuming the Digimon with the raid ability has a security attack modifier applied to it, that Digimon cannot select Venusmon as an attack target with the Raid ability.
I have a question about BLITZ. Let's say that I have a BryweLudramon (ST13) with a Duramon (ST13) as one of its Digivolution sources; giving it the end of turn DNA Digivolve inheritable. I have a second red Digimon that Digivolves into Gaiomon (BT9), giving Gaiomon BLITZ and my opponent now has memory. I BLITZ attack with Gaiomon. End of turn, the Duramon inheritable triggers, and I DNA Digivolve BryweLudramon and Gaiomon into Ragnaloardmon (ST13). Can it BLITZ attack again?
I believe with double blitzing, it could be argued that blitz doesnt stack. If it says it gains blitz, then i think its a one time hit. If it says "then " then it can blitz again i believe cuz its telling you to trigger a effect
@@Rebel3000 I know that Ragnaloardmon cannot BLITZ unsuspend and BLITZ again. But that's not what I'm asking. Because Ragnaloardmon is a new instance of a new Digimon that was Digivolved into, does it get to BLITZ; even though Gaiomon already BLITZ'd?
@@Rebel3000 See, I get that ruling. And those examples would stop at Gaiomon. Digivolve into Gaio, get BLITZ. Because that's how BLITZ works, you have to Digivolve into it, when your opponent has memory. The issue here is Ragnaloardmon. If you have the Duramon (ST13) inheritable, you can DNA Digivolve at the end of the turn. Which under these conditions, means that it should be able to BLITZ again, because it is now a new instance of BLITZ. This issue arrives because of the timing of BLITZ and the conditions that have to be fulfilled before End of Turn. You can only end your turn after all pending effect activations resolve. BLITZ happens before the End of Turn. I believe it goes like this: Gaiomon BLITZ attacks, then end of turn triggers the DNA Digivolve, which triggers Ragnaloardmon's "when digivolving" effect of BLITZ, Ragnaloardmon BLITZ attacks which turns back to before End of Turn, then after all effects resolve return to End of Turn.
@@ArcDragoon to be honest, im leaning on the side if because its a new instance if blitz, it would blitz again right after unsuspending. DNA digivolving also removes any buffs or debuffs, so Giamon's Blitz would have desolved, then Ragna gains a new instance
Does Examon or slayerdramon unsuspend after forcing an opponent to attack before the attack connects? I ask because it seems like the forced attack is a "pending effects" of the card.
Because forcing an opponent to declare an attack is part of the effect, you must fully resolve slayers effect. So what would happen is Slayer or Alexa would suspend to force an opponent to declare an attack they declare an attack and if that Digimon has when attacking effects those will be new triggers which means they will take priority over Slayer or EXA effect to unsuspend. TLDR you suspend with one of them, your opponent declares an attack and use their when attacking effects, then you use your effects that involve your Digimon suspending, and if they have blocker may choose to block
@@SkullKnight88888 no it still does it's just that because declaring an attack is part of the effect when they declare an attack their effects trigger and gain priority over exa unsuspending and attempting to block
For my own sanity I need to argue chaosdramon. The wording makes it clear that it's separate targets for each source added. We already have examples where values get added based on conditions like with dorbiks "add x for each card placed" and ex3 megidramon "add x to the value of the effect". If that was the case it needs a hard errata. The effect essentially reads "(dedigi 1 on 1 digimon) for each card placed". Not the mention the Japanese players have been playing it this way since their release. I really feel this is the wrong ruling based on the wording.
The wording is the same as BT9-107 Metal Impulse and follows the same effect structure. The Q&A for BT9 even mentions the effect specifically in that it only targets 1 Digimon for dedigivolution. Not to be rude but the Japanese players are human just like the rest of us and use effects incorrect just like any other players. Just because they get the card first does not mean that they always use them properly.
You should compare the way the effect is written vs something like Spiral Masquerade, where the effect reads: [Main] For each Digimon you have in play, activate the effect below. ・1 of your opponent's Digimon gets -3000 DP for the turn. If Chaosdramon's effect was written this way, then it would be as you say, but it is not.
Yeah this in an english translation thing, the Japanese text is structured differently and makes it clearer that all the De-Digivolves need to target the same Digimon, I agree that it should get an errata in english for clarity's sake, but for now we just need to know that for De-Digivolve effects specifically this wording does not function the same way as it does for basically anything else with this kind of wording, until JP inevitably prints a De-Digivolve effect that is meant to function the same way as everything else with this wording and it causes a bunch of confusion, but we'll burn that bridge when we get there.
So this is why I've seen exa players freak out and sell the deck. Was wondering what was going on. Edit: actually even then when would that ever happen.
That slayerdramon ruling for allowing suspended digimon to attempt to attack seems like quite the nerf on that ability. I guess the deck discourages leaving suspended digimon, but it still feels counter to how that deck seems to want to work.
@@drpulcinella1870 I just checked the phase order again and yeah it does seem like most times where something would still be unsuspended would occur because of something the examon player does currently (Samādhi Śānti and the like). If there isn’t a deck that does it to themselves now, or has something that triggers at start of main to suspend, it seems likely that there will be.
The three great angels are 三大天使 which lacks the 天使型 the other angel traits have that patamon searches for
Quality control for these erratas has to get better or something 😭 it hurts my very soul and my brain can only handle so many "this card does not play how it reads"
I really had to do a double take at 13:53 to understand what my virgin ears heard. Thanks for another informative video!
the slayerdramon stuff came up at our locals yesterday, we came to this conclusion as well
Of course I’m here! Thanks for helping us out! 🎉❤
You are my hero, thank you sir, most helpful Digituber
Thank you so much Sushi. I've learned the digimon rules all thanks to your videos
so the thing about "Three Great Angels" is that that actually is an exact translation of the Japanese being used, it's "Angel" that's different, a better translation of the Japanese would be "Angel-Type", because in Japanese a categorizing suffix is added to the end of every trait which encompasses a generalized group, so: "-Type", "-Species", "-Age", and "-Form" are used depending on the trait in question, but for something like "Three great Angels", this is not a generalized group, it's quite literately referring to exactly 3 great angels, so it doesn't get the "-Type" suffix added to the end of its trait.
thx for all the hard work these ruling are very helpful
Aaah, at last! been waiting for this, great video as always, and TYVM.
PD: You seem to have mistaken the "related content" of the video, it shows Pokemon TCG.
I think the segment relating to Imperial Fighter Mode is incorrect. The Blitz occurs during the same window as the Turn Players End of Turn effects. In this case, you end of turn DNA evolve using the armor forms, DNA using their inherited effects after digivolving into lv 5, then DNA once more into the Lv 6, and using the When Attacking of the DM blitz effect to attack into DeXmon. DeXmon does not have an effect that would be considered interruptive, so if the DeXmon does indeed survive, then yes it will delete the FM at the End of Turn. Was this ruling declared differently by Bandai?
I love you. Great video as always! HYDRUSSY!!!!!
So say with slayerdramon effect to make an opponents digimon attack, and my opponent has a stun digimon say from howling mem boost, can they still pick the stun
This is correct
If i have examon and i end my turn , opp turn i make his bwg attack he declares attack with xantibody and digivolves , does his attack resolve before I’m able to suspend and unsuspend myself and suspend his Digimon before his attack goes through
Great videos, love seeing someone taking the time to give us the complicated interaction explanations. I was wondering if there were any resources for, or ways to become a judge? My local meta is lacking in that department I was hoping to be able to step up.
Question about examon when digivolving effects. Both the regular a d DNA portions contain the word may. Am I allowed to say no to the ability to tuck in sources and then only say yes to playing a dramon onto the field?
Yes you can opt to not add a dramon under Examon for its when digivolving effect.
ähm i know this vid is 9 month old now but why does my Dorbickmon only say´s (5 Digimon cards w/different names + [Dragon] traits ) it is missing text ore something??
Can someone please help me with an interaction. I had a suspended R/P Fightermode with retaliation inherent. My opponent uses Attack of the Heavy Mobile Digimon and plays a EX1 Machinedramon with 5 sources under it. He blitz into my imperial with both of them being 13000DP. How many sources will he lose? My thought would be 4. Two for dying in battle and then 2 more for retaliation. Please help.
Hi! I have a question regarding Examon's line
I have an Examon with either Bebydomon (EX3-001) or Dracomon (EX3-037) in its sources, plus some Evade coming from Coredramon or Wingdramon, and my opponent throws a Wyvern's Breath(BT6-101), making it effectively 0DP. After that game rulings try to kill Exa, but then Evade triggers so I suspend Examon, which also triggers both Dracomon and Examon effects (and later on Bebydomon's one after Examon unsuspends), gaining some DP back and avoiding the 0DP line. Does Exa survive? or is it killed before effects resolve (or regardless of them) due to rule processing?
So how it works like Omnimon Blitz protection works, you can protect it to stop the deletion but at the end of the turn it would be deleted because it's at 0, however because Examon does restand and gains through 2k it should live. (But it's just 2k until turn ends)
Evade is interruptive, so Examon suspends, and the effects of Dracomon and Examon trigger, but they don't activate yet. Then Rules Processing tries to delete the Examon again, and it succeeds since it can't Evade since it's suspended. Since Examon's effect never activates, the Bebydomon won't even trigger, as it never unsuspends.
I need to know this too
@QwerbyKing has listed the answer to this one. They’ve beaten me to almost all these comments while I’ve been busy 😅
Awesome and informative video! I have a question, I hope you can help me, can I activate the effect of sourai on a digimon that has less than 4 sources of evolution?
i have a question about slayerdramon effect combined with breakdramon suspend effect. when it is my opponent start of main phase and i use slayerdramon effect to suspend breakdramon. does my oppoent first decide with which digimon they attack or does the breakdramon effect to suspend 1 of your opponent digimon first happen?? i see a lot of people doing it different and i am getting confused
Hei I have a question concerning Examon: let's assume I have Examon (with Blocker and evade) and Slayerdramon on the field and I use Slayerdramon (suspending himself) to force my opponent to attack. Here my first question: At what point does Slayerdramon unsuspend?
The attack then proceeds and I decide to block with Examon by suspending himself for its Blocker ability. Second question: At what point does Examon unsuspend during combat?
Lastly if the attacking Digimon is also 15k and I decided to block with Examon can I unsuspend and use its ability evade to suspend itself again?
Sorry for all the questions I want to try the deck but I don't want to cheat anyone.
When you unsuspend your digimon can u attack again with the same digimon when it un suspend it self?
You are great my man! But I have so many question now about dealing with deathmon !! If you digivolve passing turn and it has an effect to delete a DIGIMON, does DEATHX activate the end of turn before is deleted? What if is blitz swinging over DEATHX, passing turn, does The end of turn activates? What if is Omni x, with x antibody option that allows to digivolve into him (blitz then antibody effect to digivolve into him) does his when digivolving activate to kill the DEATHX before the end of turn effect since already pass the memory? Scenarios passing turn with the blitz and passing turn with the effect of x antibody when digivolves into omni x… please help!
One of those situations is literally presented in the video. Regardless, the End of Turn doesn't happen until all pending effects activate. So Omni X can delete the DeathX.
R0bo, I’ve got a question re Dorbick (D) and the Guil X / Growl X inheritable.
D says [OP] delete 1 opposing Mon w 3k DP or less. For each card w Dragon, saur, and Michael Ceratopsian, in one of its traits in D’Souza evo cards ass 2k to the max DP you can choose w this effect.
So normally, I have 5 qualifying sources that’s 10k on top of the base 3k for a total of 13k.
Similar to the modifying effect of D, Guil X’s inheritable says add 1k to the max DP you can choose with DP based deletion effects.
The normal interaction say w the other cards of the Guil tribe add 1k to the main effect.
However, w D the max effect I could choose isn’t the initial 3k, it’s the second half which adds 2k for every DSC source (assuming you Xros w more than 1 source).
If you’ve read something that answers this Q please let me know.
Love the content, and grateful for the guidance.
Thanks for taking the time.
with hina can you tap more then 1 to use the on play effects more then once?
Yes and they trigger the on play ability one after another not all at once.
I’m still very confused about examons timings when can the once per turn to unsuspend trigger on opponents turn once the attack has been declared or once the attack has landed - it seems to be a huge debate some people say during the when attacking triggers and some people say after the attack has gone through and landed - please help
You finish Slayer's effect before Exa's All Turn effect can go off. Slayer's effect ends when your opponent chooses to attack with something. Example: Slayer effect, suspend exa, opp choose a digi to attack with. That is all slayer does, his effect is over. Now Exa can use his effect because slayer's effect is over to unsuspend and suspend something.
Slayerdramon and breakdramon on board, my opponent has 2 digimon, start of opp main phase, suspend breakdramon from slaydramon effect to force opp to attack, does opp select attacker first, then breakdramon effect to suspend a digimon or would breakdramon suspend something before opp declares attacker? and if so, may they select suspended digimon (from breakdramon effect) to "fizzle" the force swing?
You have to finish resolving slayerdramon fully which includes declaring the attack. Once the attack is declared then breakdramon can resolve its effect.
Say my opponent red/purple imperialdramon(dm) with retaliation attacks by security and I block with examon. Does he restand first so I can use evade or does the attack goes through first before the the unsuspend takes place?
You will unsuspend. Assuming Exa has not unsuspended by his All Turns effect already, after you declare the block and suspend Exa, that will trigger its All Turns effect. You will have to activate the effect to unsuspend before the attack lands since all pending effects have to finish activating before the attack can finish. Then you may use Evade.
Dobrickmon. Are you able to use two Dinosaurs with different names? As I read his text it sounds like you can't.
Legit question I'm confused on - deathx ability has to resolve before a pending attack happens from imperial I understand. Why with the two slayer example does a pending attack cause the second slayer to fizzle? It was a pending triggered effect like deathx was before imperial attacked
It’s the same situation. DeathX has to activate since it’s pending. The second Slayer has to do the same. But you can’t declare an attack while a current attack is ongoing. So the second Slayer activates without an effect.
@@R0boSushi Question if I attack security with panjyamon x with leomon in its evo sources being the only digimon I have on the field and I hit a gaia force in security can I use the all turns effect to play leomon or is it not considered battle?
if I play a hydramon and my opponent was streaming and gets banned for violating twitch tos, is that a game loss? Draw?
This might be a dumb question, but do snowagumon (ex3-016) or paledramon (ex3-019) increase the cost of a jogress if one of the digimon has no sources? If so, is that tax increased if jogress is performed with 2 digimon without sources?
Yes it does assuming snowagumon or paledramon is currently an ess of one of your Digimon.
@@TonyPino18 Sweet, thank you for the response.
Question. When Imperialdramon FM gets deleted via DeathXmon End of Opponent's Turn effect would it go on to delete the Veemon and Wormmon summoned after from FM on deletion?
Ofc not, the effect has already triggered and resolved. First it deletes IFM, effect ends; then IFM reaches the trash, and the on deletion activates.
Isn't blitz an effect that has to finish before moving to the deathX trigger?
Blitz activates immediately when you choose it but the attack cannot land until all other pending effects have finished activating.
I’m confused by the interaction of Death X and imperialdramon play, if you are attacking using blitz and have declared a target, the attack itself should still go through and either check security/ destroy the unsuspended Digimon right ? Then the end of turn effect would activate for DeathXmon but if it’s no longer on the field it cannot activate and the imperialdramon would survive, since you have to still resolve an effect and an attack it’s not the end of turn till the attack step for that Digimon and it’s abilities are resolved right ?
I think the nuance in this situation is that deathX has already activated during the “end of turn” timing with the lv4s ESS. You go all the way up into fighter mode and have declared your attack, but before the battle can commence you have to resolve the deathX which proc’d earlier. The battle of an attack is not part of Blitz effect resolution, the declaration of an attack is.
@@JMoCRAY that is precisely why, both the level 4 and deathX trigger at end of turn but due to turn player priority you get to DNA first and because new triggers are given priority deathx is constantly put at the bottom of the list for its trigger to activate and resolve, meaning that once you go into fighter mode and there are no more new triggers deathX is then able to delete fighter mode
So I had a weird situation the other day with Examon.
My field: Examon and Slayerdramon
Opponent: Banchostingmon
I activate the effect of Slayerdramon, suspend the Examon for the activation cost. What happens next? Does Banchostingmon attack first and can it choose Examon as the target?
Yea you can choose to attack Examon with BanchoStingmon since it is still suspended due to Slayaddamon’s effect. Even if it then unsuspend due to its own effect, the attack is still going through.
hello! i have question regarding Examon's skill with Slayerdramon ess skill effect.
so the situation is during opponent turn after hatching or rising phase, the Examon player activate Slayerdramon ess skill effect which is force attack. By suspending Examon, which one come first? opponent attacking due to Slayerdramon ess skill effect or before opponent attack Examon suspending skill activate first? sorry for bad english. hope you understand the situation
The opponent declares the attack as a part of the Slayerdramon ESS, and since Examon is suspended at that time, it is a valid target. The Examon's unsuspends and gets the effects of any Dracomon/Bebydomon before the attack lands, since all effects pending activation activate before the attack goes through.
What i mean is... do examon suspend opponent digimon activate first or let the opponent attacking first?
@@fadzleejunaidi820 The examon's effect will trigger from suspending itself for the slayerdramon effect, but the effect will activate in full before any other effect can activate. So the opponent's digimon will have already suspended itself to declare the attack when Examon's effect gets to activate.
@@QwerbyKing alright... thank you
Can FM evolve onto the blue dragon mode? It doesn’t say anything about the same color
Yes, it only cares about the name not color
Do you know how the new Raid keyword works with venusmon’s effect
Assuming the Digimon with the raid ability has a security attack modifier applied to it, that Digimon cannot select Venusmon as an attack target with the Raid ability.
Can Examon block a 20k Jesmon unsuspend from effect then Evade to negate piercing checks?
Piercing checks does by winning the battle and the Digimon would be deleted. With evade y block the deletion. And no piercing checks.
I have a question about BLITZ.
Let's say that I have a BryweLudramon (ST13) with a Duramon (ST13) as one of its Digivolution sources; giving it the end of turn DNA Digivolve inheritable. I have a second red Digimon that Digivolves into Gaiomon (BT9), giving Gaiomon BLITZ and my opponent now has memory. I BLITZ attack with Gaiomon. End of turn, the Duramon inheritable triggers, and I DNA Digivolve BryweLudramon and Gaiomon into Ragnaloardmon (ST13). Can it BLITZ attack again?
I believe with double blitzing, it could be argued that blitz doesnt stack. If it says it gains blitz, then i think its a one time hit. If it says "then " then it can blitz again i believe cuz its telling you to trigger a effect
I think bt5 Omnimon and Shoutmon DX is the gi-to rulling on 2 digimon with just blitz
@@Rebel3000
I know that Ragnaloardmon cannot BLITZ unsuspend and BLITZ again. But that's not what I'm asking. Because Ragnaloardmon is a new instance of a new Digimon that was Digivolved into, does it get to BLITZ; even though Gaiomon already BLITZ'd?
@@Rebel3000
See, I get that ruling. And those examples would stop at Gaiomon. Digivolve into Gaio, get BLITZ. Because that's how BLITZ works, you have to Digivolve into it, when your opponent has memory.
The issue here is Ragnaloardmon. If you have the Duramon (ST13) inheritable, you can DNA Digivolve at the end of the turn. Which under these conditions, means that it should be able to BLITZ again, because it is now a new instance of BLITZ.
This issue arrives because of the timing of BLITZ and the conditions that have to be fulfilled before End of Turn. You can only end your turn after all pending effect activations resolve. BLITZ happens before the End of Turn. I believe it goes like this: Gaiomon BLITZ attacks, then end of turn triggers the DNA Digivolve, which triggers Ragnaloardmon's "when digivolving" effect of BLITZ, Ragnaloardmon BLITZ attacks which turns back to before End of Turn, then after all effects resolve return to End of Turn.
@@ArcDragoon to be honest, im leaning on the side if because its a new instance if blitz, it would blitz again right after unsuspending. DNA digivolving also removes any buffs or debuffs, so Giamon's Blitz would have desolved, then Ragna gains a new instance
What if it's a blocker that says lose 2 memory if it attacks ?
I would assume that the memory loss effect would trigger since it is attacking.
If that is the only Digimon they have on field they must attack with it and lose two memory
Does Examon or slayerdramon unsuspend after forcing an opponent to attack before the attack connects? I ask because it seems like the forced attack is a "pending effects" of the card.
Because forcing an opponent to declare an attack is part of the effect, you must fully resolve slayers effect.
So what would happen is Slayer or Alexa would suspend to force an opponent to declare an attack they declare an attack and if that Digimon has when attacking effects those will be new triggers which means they will take priority over Slayer or EXA effect to unsuspend.
TLDR you suspend with one of them, your opponent declares an attack and use their when attacking effects, then you use your effects that involve your Digimon suspending, and if they have blocker may choose to block
@@daredae436 so if the digimon forced to attack don't have when attacking efects exa wouldn't unsuspend?
@@SkullKnight88888 no it still does it's just that because declaring an attack is part of the effect when they declare an attack their effects trigger and gain priority over exa unsuspending and attempting to block
@@daredae436 thanks bro
So Patamon could grab something with the trait "Angel/Three Great Angels"? Or am I misunderstanding?
Also, how does Evade interact with Piercing if I have an effect that lets me attack an unsuspended digimon?
@@GunbladeKnight piercing only works if the Digimon is deleted if you use evade the Digimon is not deleted so piercing does not occur
Does ex3 dragon mode get blitz if it's a non dna evolution?
Yeah it does just not the deletion effect
@@AlexMartinez-gv7hy thank you
For my own sanity I need to argue chaosdramon. The wording makes it clear that it's separate targets for each source added. We already have examples where values get added based on conditions like with dorbiks "add x for each card placed" and ex3 megidramon "add x to the value of the effect". If that was the case it needs a hard errata. The effect essentially reads "(dedigi 1 on 1 digimon) for each card placed". Not the mention the Japanese players have been playing it this way since their release. I really feel this is the wrong ruling based on the wording.
The wording is the same as BT9-107 Metal Impulse and follows the same effect structure. The Q&A for BT9 even mentions the effect specifically in that it only targets 1 Digimon for dedigivolution.
Not to be rude but the Japanese players are human just like the rest of us and use effects incorrect just like any other players. Just because they get the card first does not mean that they always use them properly.
You should compare the way the effect is written vs something like Spiral Masquerade, where the effect reads:
[Main] For each Digimon you have in play, activate the effect below.
・1 of your opponent's Digimon gets -3000 DP for the turn.
If Chaosdramon's effect was written this way, then it would be as you say, but it is not.
Yeah this in an english translation thing, the Japanese text is structured differently and makes it clearer that all the De-Digivolves need to target the same Digimon, I agree that it should get an errata in english for clarity's sake, but for now we just need to know that for De-Digivolve effects specifically this wording does not function the same way as it does for basically anything else with this kind of wording, until JP inevitably prints a De-Digivolve effect that is meant to function the same way as everything else with this wording and it causes a bunch of confusion, but we'll burn that bridge when we get there.
Does sorai stop digimon that come in after it’s been actived?
Yes it will. But if that digimon gains sources in some way, it will be able to attack.
@@R0boSushi thank you very much
would any one here know if patamon or gatomon would be able to search a fallen angel?
Yes, or an Archangel. They both "contain Angel in one of their traits".
@@QwerbyKing thanks man
is slayerdramon effect mandatory?
No, it says you may suspend a dramon or examon which means you can choose to activate it
So this is why I've seen exa players freak out and sell the deck. Was wondering what was going on.
Edit: actually even then when would that ever happen.
Sourai, what if the Digi only has 3 Evo? It still resolves or do they have to have exactly 4 ?
That slayerdramon ruling for allowing suspended digimon to attempt to attack seems like quite the nerf on that ability. I guess the deck discourages leaving suspended digimon, but it still feels counter to how that deck seems to want to work.
A very small few APPARENTLY think that rule kills the deck cause people are starting to drop it. Idk why idk when this interaction would even happen
@@drpulcinella1870 I just checked the phase order again and yeah it does seem like most times where something would still be unsuspended would occur because of something the examon player does currently (Samādhi Śānti and the like). If there isn’t a deck that does it to themselves now, or has something that triggers at start of main to suspend, it seems likely that there will be.
@@dormagio even then it would depend wouldn't it? Got any examples is there something I'm missing?