Pergear CF Express Type A Prime vs Standard | Test & Impression

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @kendidshoots
    @kendidshoots  3 месяца назад +2

    🚩 Checkout with "KenLai10%off" from Pergear's global site 🚩Affiliate links if anyone is interested in picking this up!
    tinyurl.com/1TB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/520GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/320GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/260GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/260GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/160GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/160GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/80GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/80GB-Prime
    tinyurl.com/512GB-Standard

  • @OnMyTrek
    @OnMyTrek 3 месяца назад +4

    what i was looking for if prime worth the difference. thank you, will purchase via your link as an extra thanks too

    • @kendidshoots
      @kendidshoots  3 месяца назад

      Appreciate it loads man !! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 enjoy the new cardddd

  • @heikogrimm9710
    @heikogrimm9710 3 месяца назад +4

    Awesome video! Exactly the info I was looking for. Also thanks for the discound code. Cheers...

    • @kendidshoots
      @kendidshoots  3 месяца назад

      Awesome !! Thanks for stopping by !
      If you are considering to purchase it, I have an affiliate link too !

  • @JoATTech
    @JoATTech 3 месяца назад +4

    That's the video I've been waiting for.
    Although 5GB/10GB test is too small in my opinion. These cards might have some fast SLC "cache", but the rest of the card uses slower memory cells.
    You should try and copy 50-100GB file.
    Still not sure which one too choose :D. Not shooting much of hi+ burst, but I would like as much room as possible. Maybe I would get 1 standard and 1 prime to see which one is better for me and they buy more :D.

    • @kendidshoots
      @kendidshoots  3 месяца назад +1

      @@JoATTech glad that I decided to buy both cards to test out as well! Btw, I did test file transfers of 110GB video file transfer from the card to my Mac Studio. And the Standard card completed slightly faster than the Prime for some reasons!
      Overall if you don’t burst 24/7 on every single click (like sport photography, race car, sports etc), the standard is good enough I think

    • @JoATTech
      @JoATTech 3 месяца назад

      @@kendidshoots Oh ok, so I misunderstood the mac test. I thought it was 10GB file from the MAC to the card :D.
      Have you done 110GB file to the cards? The would be more interesting. I mean read test is interesting too, because I read usually 200GB of video files to my computer :D. I guess my USB ports are too slow for these cards :D.
      I shoot sports occasionally, I've seen one test and these standard cards clear the buffer slower than good v90 SD cards :(.
      But it seems that for video Standards might be enough. Though choice :D.

  • @peachatlga
    @peachatlga 2 месяца назад +1

    Thank you for the detailed test and the codes!

    • @kendidshoots
      @kendidshoots  2 месяца назад

      @@peachatlga glad it was helpful !’ Thank you so much for stopping by

  • @SimeonKolev
    @SimeonKolev Месяц назад

    The 512GB is faster because there are more chips inside and the bus is wider allowing faster transfer. If you compare Standard with Prime but in similar sizes the Prime should be faster.
    Also I noticed that 160, 320, etc cards have the VPG logo, I think they will be the fastest...

    • @TECH3_
      @TECH3_ Месяц назад

      might not be the faster ones always , but would always do the 400MBps

  • @Tantigiochi-os1fj
    @Tantigiochi-os1fj 3 месяца назад +2

    So the standard one works well with 4K 120fps? Thanks

    • @kendidshoots
      @kendidshoots  3 месяца назад

      Yes sir ! Most important information is the Bit rates! Any CF express can do ALL video features a v90 card does !