If he had, at least his druid deck would of had a win condition. He had no real threats outside the legendary cards added. He couldn't even win fatigue because of all his draw cards. Then again I guess he couldn't make a video if he had just used a random control warrior deck with MAL just thrown in.
Malchezar wasn't always bad. For a very short period of time it was a nice tech card to include when going up against a lot of mill decks, as the mill decks milled both decks so having 35 cards was a HUGE advantage.
I don't understand the hate for malhezar i always wanted him in my decks, after i've seen reno and the other highlander cards being added to that i were building some good ass decks with that😂, maybe i had absolutely no luck to cards added to my hand/deck but it was always fun to play😂😂
@@adamrozek5782 he's trash because it makes you deck a lot less consistent, which is very bad, especially when it's cards that have no synergy whatsoever...
@@adamrozek5782 the cards you want go from 2/27 and 1/27 per draw after mill to 2/33 or 1/33. and theres no way of preparing for the cards he gives you, they do random things. it makes your own deck worse but doesnt make up for it
@@adamrozek5782 Compare Renathal, who give you 5 extra health in exchange of putting 10 more cards in your deck, to Malhezar, who give you nothing for putting 6 bad cards (Malhezar itself included) in your deck, and you can immediately see why its a bad card. You want your deck to be as small as possible for almost every Card game.
You maninly played it in grindy warrior control decks for the mirror, as it almost always went to fatigue, and they could stave off death long enough that the sub-par quality of the legendary cards was outshone by the value that they provided, especially as at the time most legendaries were more expensive cards
It's less a case of Legendaries suck, it's that legendaries are more deck and playstyle specific. Patches was one of the best, but give it randomly to something like rez priest and they die inside, same way an agro deck would if they got Reno shoved in randomly. Legendaries are (usually) only good in their specific archtype and deckstyle
I mean you can take the average random card and it will be just about as bad as a random legendary. The only real difference is that the mana distribution is worse for random legendaries.
One could argue that good cards are generally practical, and thus legendaries that empower or require a supporting archetype are worse than cards that perform well in more varied environments
rarran is making such good content so consistently lately its really impressive the man is on demon time with these ideas (i think im gonna start edging to his videos)
The thing about bronze 10 is that all the bad players will be around the points where you can lose stars and be stuck there while all the good players just play at bronze as a whim when they are feeling like it
Love the hearthstone content. I was a former rank 1 legend player but ran out of disposable income to keep up with the game, love living vicariously through you for the last few months
Prince Malchezaar is the only legendary I've ever crafted a golden copy of, a long time ago. It was for a Tavern Brawl where you got to play like 10 copies of the same card and so I just got a full deck of random golden legendaries.
In that last game without the Grumble the Shaman was hoping for the chain gang to proc FIRST and then the Zola to trigger letting him go infinite - but the Zola triggered before the chain gang blocking his potential combo 👌
@@sonarchy5158 thank you for enlightening me. I could've sworn I got alakir off malchezar as rogue back in mean streets, but I suppose that was something else
I disagree with Prince Malchezaar being one of the worst legendaries, at the time he was printed there was very few ways to increase deck size and some control warrior variants would run it to win fatigue wars in the mirror match up. It was a niche card for the time but it was pretty usefull in those matchups.
I'm pretty sure just cutting a card that's meant to counter aggro (or card draw) plus malchezaar and adding 2 generically good lategame minions is better for both aggro and control matchups than running malchezaar. Malchezaar might have been okay if he were a battlecry, the real problem though is that you get those extra legendaries at the start of the game, which means you're getting a ton of dead draws even early in the game, which absolutely cripples you in every matchup that isn't going to fatigue. If he were a battlecry then at least you could just choose to not play him in the situations he's bad and then he's just 1 dead card in your hand, which isn't great but not the end of the world.. but because you get it at the start of the game, you can have up to 6 dead draws in a lot of matchups, which can pretty much outright lose the game for you single handedly.
Ok Im kinda confused here can someone from the stream lend me a hand. How is he rank 10 gold while playing warlock and bronz 10 while playing druid. Did he climb all the way up to gold 10 as the challenge went or did he played meta decks to get to a point where he doesnt play against bronze 10 weirdos?
Random legendaries kinda suck. All cards that replace your hand or deck with random legendaries were terrible. Shuffle 5 random is also super bad if you get terrible legendaries.
Can anyone think of a twist format where this card could be possibly be playable? Seeing the old legendaries they where kinda good, but some like let's say year of the gryphon yeah it sucks
I think you could've had more success running the 45 legendary deck with paladin (renathal + malchezar), it probably has a higher winrate than whatever this was xD
Yo! Dont even play HS anymore but always watch all your videos. Would love to see if you can do the impossible cursed blade firebat challenge. Rules are : 1. Equipped cursed blade turn one. 2. Always have cursed blade equipped. Opponent removes it GG quit. 3. Can only win once both players reach fatigue. Firebat could not complete it, could you 🤔
Malchezar is far from the worst legendary, would it be ony because it saw some competitive play, when some legendaries never did (The Voraxx, someone ?).
It's all subjective, in a meta where the best decks are high value control decks that go to fatigue, Malchezaar is playable because with Renathal it extends your deck size to 45 and you can out-value someone not using it. You happen to be queuing into hyper-aggro decks faster than anything in the first 10 years of Hearthstone, so of course it's going to do poorly.
22:58 for the record, you couldn’t have 6 taunts, because Siamat was still alive, and spreading plague doesnt work like unleash the hounds, unless they changed it and im still not knowing it.
I can’t tell if you’re better off w/an RNG Legendary to Punch Face, or something with tempo to help this deck :L BRB @work 👉 *Edit* Not ‘tempo’, like your decks fine. Good ‘rythem’ :o
Upgrade to this challenge: 51-card legendary deck. Renathal, Malchezar, ETC, and Cthun the shattered in one deck. Must use cthun for lethal, for extra challenge
What if i will tell you Rarran that you suck at playing this game, not the card? Btw this game is about fun, not tryharding all days for position in legend rank, you know.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
Dude I can't believe you put the whole game in there!
I'm Rodan dude! That was an incredible game man. Super honored to be featured on here 😁
omg that's amazing! ❤
Why play a pirate deck
@@dezmas9332 Fast enough deck with climbing potential in the work restroom plus one meme card to tie everything together.
Why not play a pirate deck?
You lost a lot because you didn't add Prince Renathal to make a 45 card deck...
And you didnt add cthun the shattered....
If he had, at least his druid deck would of had a win condition. He had no real threats outside the legendary cards added. He couldn't even win fatigue because of all his draw cards. Then again I guess he couldn't make a video if he had just used a random control warrior deck with MAL just thrown in.
Possibility of a 48 card deck with ETC?
Just run yogg as your win-con after playing everything. Or just make a good deck.
@kristeenlivesay2664 nothing like playing 30+ min match just to play yog and draw 50 cards and die.
Malchezar wasn't always bad. For a very short period of time it was a nice tech card to include when going up against a lot of mill decks, as the mill decks milled both decks so having 35 cards was a HUGE advantage.
I don't understand the hate for malhezar i always wanted him in my decks, after i've seen reno and the other highlander cards being added to that i were building some good ass decks with that😂, maybe i had absolutely no luck to cards added to my hand/deck but it was always fun to play😂😂
@@adamrozek5782 he's trash because it makes you deck a lot less consistent, which is very bad, especially when it's cards that have no synergy whatsoever...
@@adamrozek5782 the cards you want go from 2/27 and 1/27 per draw after mill to 2/33 or 1/33. and theres no way of preparing for the cards he gives you, they do random things. it makes your own deck worse but doesnt make up for it
@@adamrozek5782 Compare Renathal, who give you 5 extra health in exchange of putting 10 more cards in your deck, to Malhezar, who give you nothing for putting 6 bad cards (Malhezar itself included) in your deck, and you can immediately see why its a bad card. You want your deck to be as small as possible for almost every Card game.
You maninly played it in grindy warrior control decks for the mirror, as it almost always went to fatigue, and they could stave off death long enough that the sub-par quality of the legendary cards was outshone by the value that they provided, especially as at the time most legendaries were more expensive cards
It's less a case of Legendaries suck, it's that legendaries are more deck and playstyle specific. Patches was one of the best, but give it randomly to something like rez priest and they die inside, same way an agro deck would if they got Reno shoved in randomly. Legendaries are (usually) only good in their specific archtype and deckstyle
Man spoke facts
I mean you can take the average random card and it will be just about as bad as a random legendary. The only real difference is that the mana distribution is worse for random legendaries.
@@ruukineni wouldnt be so sure of that. There are a crap ton of bad non legendary cards in hearthstone.
@@lordspotato5032specifically bad epics, they were throwing with epics back in the day.
One could argue that good cards are generally practical, and thus legendaries that empower or require a supporting archetype are worse than cards that perform well in more varied environments
The last game was gripping! Keep up the great content man!
rarran is making such good content so consistently lately its really impressive the man is on demon time with these ideas (i think im gonna start edging to his videos)
Honestly same
Gonna start? You havent started yet wtf?
First time?
I watch these videos using Microsoft Edge for a reason
The Renethal + Malc + New C'Thun hunter won in my heart
Why did gastropod show 1/3 and then become a 1/2 at 20:25?
Rarran not reverbing the Savanna highmane two times in a row hurt my soul
and you win a challenfe with its rng
"My grandfather's deck has no pathetic cards, Kaiba."
The thing about bronze 10 is that all the bad players will be around the points where you can lose stars and be stuck there while all the good players just play at bronze as a whim when they are feeling like it
3:34 Me when I see a small, flying insect.
With content so goated I don't have to try edging on your videos anymore it just happens naturally.
You know it's a great video when my man takes out Invigorate over a Wild Growth.
We unironically played Malchezar and Elise in Control Warrior back in the day for fatigue lol
Love the hearthstone content. I was a former rank 1 legend player but ran out of disposable income to keep up with the game, love living vicariously through you for the last few months
I was a top player like you, until I took a kobold in the knee
Prince Malchezaar is the only legendary I've ever crafted a golden copy of, a long time ago. It was for a Tavern Brawl where you got to play like 10 copies of the same card and so I just got a full deck of random golden legendaries.
In that last game without the Grumble the Shaman was hoping for the chain gang to proc FIRST and then the Zola to trigger letting him go infinite - but the Zola triggered before the chain gang blocking his potential combo 👌
I wonder if Death Knight would do well, since the class has fewer bad legendaries
I’m pretty sure it will just give you a horde of terrible neutral legendaries.
Prince malchezar can give legendaries from any class
@@Kyagrez According to the Hearthstone wiki, "only cards suitable for the player's class will be chosen", where did you get that from ?
@@sonarchy5158 thank you for enlightening me. I could've sworn I got alakir off malchezar as rogue back in mean streets, but I suppose that was something else
31:25 aint no way you get rid of better wild growth over normal shitty wild growth
12:33 BG3 and Elden Ring are amazing.
Would be nice if heartstone added a card that says: draw a card that didnt start in your deck. Oooh wait xd. Love the content Rarran!
I don't even play hs regularly anymore but still edge to all the rarran videos
20:25 wtf that snail? BLIZZAAAAAAAARD
I disagree with Prince Malchezaar being one of the worst legendaries, at the time he was printed there was very few ways to increase deck size and some control warrior variants would run it to win fatigue wars in the mirror match up.
It was a niche card for the time but it was pretty usefull in those matchups.
It was also played for the fun of dropping completely unexpected cards that sometimes were useful
I'm pretty sure just cutting a card that's meant to counter aggro (or card draw) plus malchezaar and adding 2 generically good lategame minions is better for both aggro and control matchups than running malchezaar.
Malchezaar might have been okay if he were a battlecry, the real problem though is that you get those extra legendaries at the start of the game, which means you're getting a ton of dead draws even early in the game, which absolutely cripples you in every matchup that isn't going to fatigue. If he were a battlecry then at least you could just choose to not play him in the situations he's bad and then he's just 1 dead card in your hand, which isn't great but not the end of the world.. but because you get it at the start of the game, you can have up to 6 dead draws in a lot of matchups, which can pretty much outright lose the game for you single handedly.
druid casually hitting 20 mana before enemy hits 10
I remember actually putting malchezar in my renolocks to avoid fatigue... Probably wasnt worth it, but still
You should do winning a game with only legendaries in every class
only legendary even DH for the ultimate pay2lose
legendaries stopped being just some stats and tailored to support strategies, its generally why its sucks to generate those
What if you make a deck with every start of game effect possible?
Everybody laughing until random Reno comes in clutch
You can't escape Nat Pagle and his evil twin in all of these challenges, can you?
The fact that he didn't play sharp-eyed seeker is a crime
You face not Machezzar alone, but the legions of awful legendaries I command
20:26 shows a 1/3 gastropod, gets summoned as a 1/2. Blizzard pls
cactus summons a 1/2 copy
Babe new rarren video just dropped
Why did the rank change from bronze to gold and back?
My guess is that the Warlock games were recorded some days after the druid ones
What he did to go from bronze 10 to gold 10 is anyone's guess though
Exactly this, did another challenge between
My fellow Canadian with another bangerrr
Ok Im kinda confused here can someone from the stream lend me a hand. How is he rank 10 gold while playing warlock and bronz 10 while playing druid. Did he climb all the way up to gold 10 as the challenge went or did he played meta decks to get to a point where he doesnt play against bronze 10 weirdos?
Random legendaries kinda suck. All cards that replace your hand or deck with random legendaries were terrible. Shuffle 5 random is also super bad if you get terrible legendaries.
sour skittles > other candy
Bro Kripp was doing 35 legendary decks when you were in diapers
scale of onyxia + floop, any win con and any random card in druid deck = free win
I came for the deck but I stayed for Rarren complaining about wild
Can anyone think of a twist format where this card could be possibly be playable? Seeing the old legendaries they where kinda good, but some like let's say year of the gryphon yeah it sucks
Malchezzar is banned in the current twist format for some reason
@@TheArcv2 either they tried something and he bacame too OP, or theres a bug where you can get legendaries outside of twist format
how come ur gold 10 with warlock games and bronze 10 with druid?
That’s just what playing Druid does to you
good stats for the cost, does renathal without garbage p2w
????? are we forgetting how mal was in almost every reno deck and the best tech for mill back then
why did he keep wild growth and remove invigorate
Where are the Sharp-Eyed Seekers? Pull them legends out earlier!
26:19 my favorite moment
I think you could've had more success running the 45 legendary deck with paladin (renathal + malchezar), it probably has a higher winrate than whatever this was xD
Yo! Dont even play HS anymore but always watch all your videos.
Would love to see if you can do the impossible cursed blade firebat challenge.
Rules are :
1. Equipped cursed blade turn one.
2. Always have cursed blade equipped. Opponent removes it GG quit.
3. Can only win once both players reach fatigue.
Firebat could not complete it, could you 🤔
I like how you have the lackey legendary in hand and asked “are there legendaries that generates lackeys” dude you’re holding it in your hands
Malchezar is far from the worst legendary, would it be ony because it saw some competitive play, when some legendaries never did (The Voraxx, someone ?).
Legendary cards doesn't suck, random legendary cards do
It's all subjective, in a meta where the best decks are high value control decks that go to fatigue, Malchezaar is playable because with Renathal it extends your deck size to 45 and you can out-value someone not using it. You happen to be queuing into hyper-aggro decks faster than anything in the first 10 years of Hearthstone, so of course it's going to do poorly.
Haven't played in years but can we talk about the most scuffed hero skin we have ever seen to druid. Why c'thun???
Rather of seen a only legendarys deck. Maybe even with bigger deck, and this card from this video
My Odd Galakrond Renathal Malchezar Thief priest has positive win rate in silver, just so you know
Its not Legendarys suck... its RANDOM Legendaries suck.
Random legendaries are always good!
Edging rn 🥵🥵🥵
You should play a deck that's perfectly balanced 3 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 drops,
22:58 for the record, you couldn’t have 6 taunts, because Siamat was still alive, and spreading plague doesnt work like unleash the hounds, unless they changed it and im still not knowing it.
He could play Siamat and then play plague before trading at all. 7 enemies means spreading plague fills the rest of the board.
@@alexanderblixt1221 hmm.
how did i not see that ?
Rarran, I have a new challenge for you. Go a single game without mispronouncing a proper noun
I can’t tell if you’re better off w/an RNG Legendary to Punch Face, or something with tempo to help this deck :L BRB @work 👉 *Edit* Not ‘tempo’, like your decks fine. Good ‘rythem’ :o
Day 68 of waiting for Rarran to play Plants vs Zombies Heroes.
1 day away from the funny number.
should have went mill druid
these comments show up so fucking fast
do all commons vs all legendarys lmfao
Control Warrior would have been the best choice. As its win condition would be to just outlast the opponent anyways
Upgrade to this challenge: 51-card legendary deck. Renathal, Malchezar, ETC, and Cthun the shattered in one deck. Must use cthun for lethal, for extra challenge
Literally my favorite card
do jades vs automaton
Yes I’m sure the Golden Hunter with a gold deck is definitely brand new to the game lol
I don't know I just like them
Day 66 of Rarran's Really Cringy Comments. We got
2 We're so back
2 Thoughts
1 Copium
1 Poggers
1 KEKW
1 Giga Cringe
imagen playing softlock shadder at bronze 10 and loosing to the prince KEKW
I hit the sub button as you requested but I was already subbed so now I am unsubbed. ARE YOU HAPPY RARRAN?!
BG3 Voxy collab when?
Devious clickbait
I didnt enjoy the video
What if i will tell you Rarran that you suck at playing this game, not the card? Btw this game is about fun, not tryharding all days for position in legend rank, you know.