The list is not actually sorted from highest(best) pay per stream to lowest(worst) pay per stream; it appears to be in a random order. The correct order if organized from best pay per stream/streams to get 1k to worst pay per stream/streams to get to 1k would be: 1) Tidal $0.013/76,924 2) Apple Music $0.01/100,000 3) RUclips Music $0.008/125,000 4) Deezer $0.0064/156,250 5) Amazon Music $0.004/250,000 6) Spotify $0.0033/303,030 7) Pandora $0.0013/769,231
@@jappolicario3002 I just download music from RUclips and play them, no ads, no music disappearing, no 10$/month. It’s less convenient to download music from RUclips though than just using Spotify.
I had a lofi beat blow up last year and it got 3.5 million streams and the thing I learned was yeah it is kind of crappy that spotify pays so little, but if you have a couple of beats that are performing decently well, that’s really the key to being a successful independent artist. It’s all about having a rich catalogue that has potential to be playlisted, even if most of them don’t get playlisted.
In my experience, Spotify just seems more accessible for people to use. Apple Music is fine but it still has that sense of "exclusivity" in the air which turns some users off. I guess it really depends on someone's music platform preference
Nah. It's more about how the person consumes music. Your casual listener is way more likely to go for Spotify, with its playlist management, social and discovery features. An enthusiast who likes to "own" (I realise these days we actually own nothing with music streaming) every album released by their favourite artist along with lossless formats will opt for Apple Music. I disagree with Spotify being "more accessible". Unless you are talking music and the fact Spotify has some free access. Otherwise Apple Music is most places Spotify is and it's all about how you prefer to consume your music. Most prefer "tracks on demand" which is why Spotify does so well. Especially with younger generations.
@@j800r_aswell In my opinion, I only like Apple Music for the lossless audio and the better payment for artists. I tried Apple Music properly last time, but the discovery functions for some nice genres is just absolutely terrible. Spotify thrives with their AI playlists. If Spotify introduces their Spotify Platinum (lossless) subscription, I'm all in. No matter if it's a lot more expensive. I listen to music almost the whole day. :)
I prefer Apple Music for the better UI (at least on mobile.) Spotify's UI just isn't good. Lyrics UI looks horrible, some UI is hard to navigate... it's just not as easy to listen to the music that you want to listen to. Plus the Music app also includes music files imported from iTunes, so...
I actually would have thought they pay way less. I have Apple Music Family with 2 friends and my siblings. If we on average listen 2h/day/person and a song plays for an average of 2 minutes Apple has to pay artist 90€ and we are only paying 15 a month. And Apple has to provide all of the infrastructure on top of that.
People don't understand how important sound quality is to some people. Listening to music is not all about playlists and recommendations and how everything happens automatically for you. You don't have to be an "audiophile" to enjoy high quality audio. I also get infuriated listening to retards who only talk about "noise cancellation" when doing "headphone reviews", and only talk about loudness when talking about sound quality. They're the same kind of people who would talk only about cameras while reviewing smartphones.
An important difference he showed us but didn’t mention was the charts. Spotify peaked the tailed off rapidly towards zero. Don’t expect much more cash to come from them. Apple is keeping pretty steady. There should be way more rolling in as we go on.
2 key difference between the songs is the Spotify track blew up from a viral tiktok quite some time ago & the Apple Music song like I mentioned was placed in the huge Apple Music playlist and is still in it to this day
True I need to promote other platforms, I usually mention Spotify when people ask me where to hear my music. Best money I’ve made from my music was people actually purchasing the downloads from Amazon
On Spotify, it also depends where the people are listening your music: you can make $17K per 1M streams if the plays are coming from South Korea. On the other hand, if your streams are coming from Turkey, you only get about $600 per 1M streams.
congrats on the morning brew shout out ! always appreciate a creator who sections off their ad reads, and this video was fascinating to watch. good job !!
Im not an artist but this is great insight. I think as consumers we start using the platforms that give back to the artists the most. Would you like to see more people using apple music?
Or potentially get Spotify to provide better services for artists (potentially by indicating our willingness to pay more in subscription fees if they pay artists more). Spotify has a great service for consumers - it’s a sticky platform and a lot of people don’t want to switch.
Ideally no...because now you are giving over control to a technology that you have no control over and actually has rights to your property & control of your money.
The same way people get on long lines and campouts to get the new Jordans, Yeezys(used to be), & iPhones...is the same way people need to line up to get there fav artists new album. Hell people do it to get into concerts...so why not for music.
Great job man. Even if the payout is quite limited, you still have the talent to repeat the process over again and even triple that amount for several years. Props.
Back when people bought cds you’d get a dollar per cd. So if you sold 10 millions copies, 10 millions bucks and then you could tour and keep all of it . Now? Labels take your lowly from all your income and barely even pay you what you get on streaming platforms as if they can’t keep up with the numbers
This is why as a musician I use Tidal for listening - I want the money I spend on music going to my fellow artists as much as possible. Thanks for the info and congrats on the streams!
Unfortunately that's not the case the money is going into licensing a decoding process which no one asked to encode in the first place.. Deezer and Qobuz might be better choices if you want money to go into hard work and not into shareholders.
@@absolutium The only way for songs to be legally allowed on streaming platforms is for those platforms to pay for the licenses for those songs. Another thing is that I see majority of the comments here only mentioning money without realizing that if the money is coming from listeners and the majority of listeners arent on Tidal, Deezer or Qobuz then youre gonna see a real difference in how much your making Quarter to Quarter because thats how you get payed out in the music industry. Also everyones convinced that Spotify is the shitty platform cuz of how much it pays out, but no one has considered that most other platforms dont have the same user base as Spotify meaning the dollar doesnt have to get split as many ways on other platforms.
@@madeinjei Well.. To be accurate Spotify is essentially giving the listener 1/4 of a song.. if you read my reply again your are going to notice the response is about technical licensing not administrative bs.
@@absolutium The technical licensing is apart of the contract you make with, or contract but in place by, your label / publisher. You cant divide the 2 into different categories because everyone's picking from the same pot
@@madeinjei That statement is how I know you have no idea what is being talked about.. Look at GoldenSound video regarding MQA.. come back with your findings.
Spotify doesn't have to pay apple for hosting on app store.. they used to but not anymore. Only purchase made on the app are charged 30%. But if you notice you cannot anymore pay through the app for Spotify. Same goes with Netflix, Hulu etc etc streaming apps
about 40k and 13k respectively on each platform based on 4m streams at the advertised rate. Actual price they paid out, based on streams and paid amount: Spotify rounded to $11700 and 4.5m streams thats .0026 opposed to their advertised .0033, which would take about 385k streams to get $1k. Apple rounded to $24200 and 4.5m streams again. Thats roughly .0054(rounded, it was 53777 with repeating 7) as opposed to the advertised .01, which would tkae about 185000 streams to get $1k. Moral of the story: giving guides like that is pointless because there will be this or that reason that you aren't being paid the full amount thats advertised
this. only amazon music unlimited pays more than 0.01 on average and not even that in some "poor" countries. researched this and amazon is best paying and surprisingly youtube music premium is second (0.008 average) best paying music platform in 2024, 3rd is tidal (which is advertised to be best paying) with average like 0.007 per stream. very hard to find info about this but your numbers were right about spotify/apple too.
Digital music was encouraged by labels to regain control as far as the money. Years ago, too many folks were making a fortune selling their own music from the trunks of their cars and online, thus cutting the distributors and labels out completely. When music distributors and record store chains statred going bankrupt in the late 90's early 2000's, I saw where this was going then.
Its actually not the case, Digital music was looked down upon by labels at first and seen as unprofitable. Long story short, labels started making money off of licensing artists to streaming platforms and then later had to figure out a way to make more profit once streaming blew up so streaming profits came into play with how payouts were dealt out.
Hey, L.Dre, another aspect of this conversation is also the quality of the streamed music. Spotify is just now catching up to #HiFi standards (CD-Quality) for Premium and that's pretty sad when Apple Music is at all the way up to #HiRes (24-bit up to 192KkHz with proper equipment) lossless at every level. Yeah, LoFi is cool, too, right. It just seems that features are one thing, and while part of the experience, but when is the younger Gen going to 'listen' to music rather than just 'hear' it? We deal with this in our various degree programs constantly and it must be a learned trait - this can greatly influence those paying for music and making their voice much more potent in ensuring artists get their portion, too. Just a thought :) BTW, where did your get those nice Sound Treatment panels - dang nice.
This is one of the most straight forward videos I’ve seen on RUclips. Thank you so much for not beating around the bush or dragging it out. Great info 🤙
Just streamed I Miss The Rain and it's soothing HipHop chill. Here's the thing, because you sound so much better at the Lossless level, in my car you got that 3peat triple play from me. At this point the Lossless experience is so far ahead of Spotify a lot of us just keep replaying our Apple Music Library. You're at the 16 Bit 48kHZ level. If you can level up to the Dolby Atmos surround sound sonic stratosphere, you'd get more streams. That's my 3¢ lol. 👊🏾
Distrokid is convenient but they keep reducing my songs from 24hz to 16hz CD quality for Tidal because I don’t pay to be audiophile verified Seeing that they pay the best is it worth the $20 USD to be verified?
As expected the industry is very unfriendly when it comes to independent artists. Kinda sucks when we have all the platforms and the technology in the world but big companies will still promote old and already established artist's
not gonna lie that's kind of a dumb play there. will you make more money; Probably, but you've also put yourself in a really small space meaning your opportunities to grow your platform as an artist are going to be virtually non existent, and if Tidal were to grow as big a Spotify it would only end up making Tidal have the same issue you have with Spotify.
@@madeinjei While your first point is obviously true (although "non-existent" is obviously a comical exaggeration), I see no reason to assume Tidal would change their remuneration model to be more like Spotify because they became more popular/successful. Moreover, and I accept I could have made this clearer in my original post, although it will probably seem pretty obvious when you read it, my comment was from a consumer's perspective, not a creator's.
nah. I'd rather have Apple Music than sticking to Tidal. Tidal and Apple Music's royalty is close enough but subscription price is way different. Tidal is expensive as hell and paired with the fact that they have way less collection of songs. Not to mention the number of subscriptions. As an artist who wants to earn more, I'd rather do business with a platform with many subscribers than in a platform that pays a little higher but has subscribers a fraction of the nearest competition. Also Apple music subscriptions has been increasing ever since after they launched the Apple One subscription which bundles every Apple's service. This was in fact the reason why I jumped from Spotify into Apple music and imported my Spotify playlist into Apple Music. It even become better after Apple launched the Lossless music in which Spotify is still yet to implement.
This video really inspired me to try even harder to make music, I’m new to music produce and I don’t know any chords progression, I made some simple lofi last year and it was really hard and I didn’t know where to earn money from music for small artist, now I know the possibilities to make a living of it , thank you Ldre!❤
As an artist - obviously I would like to see us all get the bag that we deserve. Yet, I see y’all saying “we should be paid” but realistically looking, those companies are just trynna make money and not justice fighters. In today world there are so many artists and musicians that sadly, it would be so hard for those companies to pay everyone more than that.
Why don't they use a scale to pay more for first thousands stream and then a bit less the more to 100k+ until you reach plateau of $/stream. That would help smaller artists, and maybe help to redirect money from big names to smaller ones.
Always been an Apple Music consumer. I'm a traditionalist when it comes to my music and like to hold a collection. Whether that be physical or digital. Spotify is great for social features and playlists. Maybe even slightly better with discovering new artists. However, when it comes to music library management, Apple Music has them beat by a lightyear. Essentially, Spotify has no real library. Wanna organise your music? It's playlists or bust. Whereas Apple Music has all the same library management as iTunes. Meaning I have a stored library of many artists and their albums from Accept to Yes and everything in between. It must be remembered that Spotify have a free tier, that many if not most users will be using. This will be a huge reason why their payout is far less.
Streaming platforms should definitely be paying the artists more, because without the artists those platforms literally have no product to profit from...!!! Great vid...!!! 👍
@@madeinjei... Then artists should curtail their _supplies_ until their _demands_ are met! And streaming payouts aren't based on government laws, but on company policies.
@@helloxonsfan There are laws put in place that limit the amount of money a label/publisher/distributer is allowed to payout an artist per quarter, there's also a minimum, working in the music industry is still a something you would file a w9 for and thus there have to be regulations put in place so that it doesnt get abused, and as an artist when youre working out your contract your almost never going to get exactly what you want because youre technically compromising with your investor.
@@madeinjei... The payout to artist was actually a deal negotiated by the major record companies & the streaming platforms back in the early days if streaming. It hasn't changed since. Record companies still get the bulk of the share, while artists still get a pittance.
@@helloxonsfan its way more complicated than that. look at the credits of the song and then add a few more people and those are all of the people that need to get paid for the song. The record label has to pay all that out and the artist gets a little because every year the record label gives out a loan the artist that must be paid back by the end of the contract and sometimes our pesky little artist goes and spends that money on shit not related to the actual production of the piece ( when I say shit I mean things other than basic living necessities) so if for example they invest $100,000 to you, your song makes $200,000 but you spent $90,000 then your doing $200,000 - $90,000 and thats just pay back the loan cuz everyone involved in the production has to get their payout / royalty so $110,000 can end up turning into like $30,000 - $40,000 if u as the artist arent careful with how u spend the money
I've went back and forth about whether I prefer Spotify or Apple Music. Experience is pretty similar but I'll be going with the one that pays the artist more. Easy choice at that point.
It's weird to see a Lo-Fi artist. As a "lofi connoisseur," normally the people that make it are very private. With potsu being my favorite lofi artst, I only know what he looks like
Damn. I was very close with Spotify and very far off with Apple Music, since taking 100k streams for $1k brings to $40k. So I subbed :) Anyway I knew these platforms didn't pay much but I thought they paid much much more, I mean artists release few songs a year or not even. I wish they paid more, they probably do pay more some artists that literally bring most of the users to the platform, still it sucks
I guess the way I look at streaming is it’s great for established artists because you keep getting money every time someone listens to your music vs someone buying physical media and then your income is over. For up and coming maybe it’s a little spare change. I dunno. I personally will buy a record from an artist I really like and then listen to their music on a streaming service. I very rarely sit down and listen to a record but at least it’s a way to support smaller artists. Can’t fight it so might as well embrace it and try to figure out how to make it work.
I believe that Spotify being in more markets and more paid subscribers means a large chunk of their subscribers are from low income countries where subscription fees are lower and the ad revenues as well so to compensate that they have a lower rate. Tidal being only available in high income countries pays the most. So the rate is decided by mix of paid subscribers from various income group countries. Ideally there should be different rate for streams from different countries to maximize artist compensation. RUclips does it for its videos. So you get paid more if someone from Europe or North America streams your songs.
The value balances out to whatever the world currency is which is the US Dollar. 100 Yen = $1.00+/- meaning that the Spotify premium package in Japan would probably be around 1,000 yen+/-. I just looked up the cost for Spotify in India and the subscription plans work differently which seems to not only have to do with the value of the currency. You said the subscription fees are lower in low income countries but I really just comes down to the value of the currency and how much it costs to buy things. for example although the cost of spotify premium in india costs 119 Rupees the cost of a bottle of water in India is 30 Rupees +/-, which if u do a little math would be the equivalent of $10 in Rupee
@@madeinjei I mean cost of a water bottle is not Rs 30 its Rs 20 ( 25 cents ) for brands like Aquafina and Kinley. If you buy a full 15 bottle set it costs Rs 15 (19 cents) per bottle. I dont know whats that in terms of Purchasing power parity. So just like you said its Rs 119 which is approx $1.5 per month which impacts artists income. India doesnt even give you volume as competitors are way cheaper giving you music subscriptions at 1/3rd of the cost.
Hey, cool video. I stopped at 00:58 and was just wondering how exactly Spotify would be in the 4th palace before RUclips Music when YTM pays 0,008 which is more than the 0,0033 from Spotify.
Musicians are much better off than painters. No matter if a picture gets viewed a billion times, the artist does not get a cent. Musicians gets royalties all their lives and their estates keep getting them for another 70 years after death.
I think Spotify's payout is fair to be honest. I'm from Sri Lanka and Spotify is so much cheaper in comparison to other alternatives. I do have so much respect for Spotify for making music accessible to so many people as well. Spotify costs $1.44/mo individual and $2.30/mo family, whereas Apple $6.49/mo individual and $9.99/mo family. Students on Spotify pay less than a dollar $0.72/month. Apple can keep it's higher margins since many users who choose Apple music does so mainly because of the Apple eco system. Spotify targets towards its audience with it's free plans and low fees internationally. I've noticed how the prices are so much more higher in the US for spotify premium compared to Apple as well. So I guess Spotify has a team to look in to international pricing based on demand and the financial aspects of specific countries.
0:57, last time I looked 0.008 is bigger than 0.0033, and 125,000 streams to get to $1000 is better than 303,000 views… The ordering of the revenue from each platform is incorrect, if that table’s values are correct then it should be #1 Tidal, #2 Apple, #3 youtube, #4 Deezer, #5 Amazon, #6 Spotify and # 7 Pandora…
@@MathieuLLF no it’s actually very clean simple and to the point yet still elegant like the rest of apples designs . I have found the ai recommendations clutter crap though
How much for 196,000 plays on my song 10,000 coming from apple music and the rest from Spotify the majority like 65% coming from Brazil by ad supporters
@@LDreTheGiant I know how much you make for each sign up. it's $10. It used to be $5. Since you like throwing out numbers... I'm curious about how much money that Distrokid affiliate link can bring in after promoting it for a couple years. I came across a RUclips producer who was honest and said he makes more money from the Distrokid affiliate link than he does from the music he has on streaming site's. You need 25,000 streams on Spotify to make $100. You only need 10 people to sign up to Distrokid through your affiliate link to make $100. You do the math! LOL It's called the "Distrokid Affiliate" link hustle. LOL
@@notsogood9449 ahhhhh I see what you’re saying lmao yeah I guess that could be a good hustle last time I checked I have made like $23-25k from it over the past few years which ironically is the equivalent of 4 million streams on Apple Music lol but affiliate marketing in general is a whole other source of income. I still make a few hundred a month by just having my gear linked to Amazon in my description 🤷🏽♂️
i just thought i would give you some extra insight into the numbers. I've studied them myself. 1. like you said the free Spotify tier pays less royalty ( way less ) than the premium streams. also, the amount you receive from a stream depends on the country where the song was listened to. for example, a stream in the USA will pay more than a stream in a developing economy like India. 2. a big reason why a company like Spotify is paying out less than for example apple is due to the fact that for apple and amazon as well the streaming site is just a side hustle to keep people in their ecosystem. their core business isn't in music so they can make a significant loss on the music streamed. for Spotify, this is just not the case. if you look into the financials of Spotify they are basically always losing money. Tidal is also having big financial losses year over year. 3. just like the streams from free Spotify users the free trial users for apple music also have a lower payout per stream than the normally subscribed users. 4. its also important to mention that the average payouts per stream only are meant for independent artists, the label for big artists negotiates rates with the streaming services separately.
Apple does not sell Apple Music at a loss. They do choose to give a higher percentage of their Apple Music revenue to artists, which certainly impacts profit margins, but theirs is not a loss leader company culture. Spotify’s major advantage is global ubiquity without platform bias catering to a much broader population at all economic levels.
Well Apple has other sources of income than apple music not like spoitfy. Also spotify has much more artists so their money needs to be spread along way more artists. There are 3 times more users but there are more than 3 times more artists on spotify than on apple music
The reason is apple music is just for paid subscribers. So if you got 4 mill on Apple, all the 4 million listeners are paid. On the other hand if u got 4 mill on Spotify, more than half of them would be free listeners.
I recently realized how much BUYING music matters. Please be sure to buy some of your favorite artists’ songs/albums! Sales mean so much more than streams, especially for smaller artists!
It's funny because it is sponsored material where Videos about products or services that are independent because they are the creators of the video and there is some relationship with the product or service according RUclips policy ❤
whats up with yt music, i prefer to switch from spotify to yt, because of the benefit to minimizing commercials and you find artist there, which aren't on spotify/apple music because they release before streaming was this huge.
I need help with something.. I think distrokid is trying to rip me off! I made a withdrawal by cheque almost 6 moths ago ..the cheque never got here! I've sent lots of emails but they keep telling me if after 6 months I don't cash the cheque, they'll cancel it and I have to pay a $35 fee to them!!! How is it that I have to pay for their mistake? U don't get it!! They claim they can confirm they sent the cheque but can't track it smh !! How do I know they even sent it? Aren't they trying to scam more money out of me??? Help pls
I can assure you Distrokid doesn’t try to scam people. Sounds to me like the check probably got lost in the mail and it would be fault of the mail courier. $35 fee sounds pretty normal to me tbh
Its not about the money ..quality of service am worried about ..don't they have to make sure the mail gets to where it needs to get? I want to know my fault here..thanks
@@kevinbeats3814 I’d say the main thing is that you waited 6 months to contact them. If it was sooner maybe they could do something but that’s a long time
That's not the case I started sending them messages two weeks after the withdrawal was made ..been talking to them for 6 month..before, they told me to keep waiting or cancel it ..I decided to wait because I was told I wouldn't have to pay anything after six months ..now they're telling me I have to pay regardless.. That's when I flipped
congrats (I'm following on spotify btw) - my opinion is it's a lot easier to promote on spotify than with apple music, being an unknown it's next to impossible to get heard on apple music. With spotify it's doable.
I believe producers think that getting underpaid from one source is undercutting talent and robbery, but the internet is a big place and posting music through multiple platforms is how it works. Would it make sense to pay $100 for a Spotify subscription when its a vast market? It works both ways and the streaming avenues are plentiful at a reasonable price. Video streaming services are similar yet revenue streams can be accessed from a garage compared to the hands on that it was 15 years ago. The real question is, if you didn't upload to the other service, would you get 9 million views?
In terms of marketing, if the objective is to get people to listen to your music... why advertise to a specific streaming platform? I don't understand the strategy behind that. Especially if you want to get genuine numbers.
I like to market to all platforms but budget wise let’s say you run ads it could be a better use of your money to promote towards the platforms with the most users
@@LDreTheGiant I see, but then you get into things like the payola scheme and other things the industry does for a particular artist. That's just too much work for the little reward unless you find learning how things work fun. I think if you do it, do it for the purity of the content you put out. you may be getting low numbers in one location, switch to that location to promote to boost your numbers there. You might be right tho Dre.
ei man, how can you get the money from distrokid? you said it's 3 month delay but from spotify to you or you mean the distrokid? if you can explain because i make music and use distrokid too thank you
The list is not actually sorted from highest(best) pay per stream to lowest(worst) pay per stream; it appears to be in a random order. The correct order if organized from best pay per stream/streams to get 1k to worst pay per stream/streams to get to 1k would be:
1) Tidal
$0.013/76,924
2) Apple Music
$0.01/100,000
3) RUclips Music
$0.008/125,000
4) Deezer
$0.0064/156,250
5) Amazon Music
$0.004/250,000
6) Spotify
$0.0033/303,030
7) Pandora
$0.0013/769,231
All about YT music for me. I dunno why anyone messes with Spotify. Can't stand Spotify
@@leestrz4153 Spotify has a lots of social features + better shuffle play
@@jappolicario3002 spotify shuffle is horrible
@@jappolicario3002 I just download music from RUclips and play them, no ads, no music disappearing, no 10$/month. It’s less convenient to download music from RUclips though than just using Spotify.
i honestly forgot pandora exists
I had a lofi beat blow up last year and it got 3.5 million streams and the thing I learned was yeah it is kind of crappy that spotify pays so little, but if you have a couple of beats that are performing decently well, that’s really the key to being a successful independent artist. It’s all about having a rich catalogue that has potential to be playlisted, even if most of them don’t get playlisted.
100% and congrats on that!
What's it called
@@Vince_Cuh yeah
@@Vince_Cuh i'd like to know too
@@Vince_Cuh it’s called B U M M E R with all the spaces in between!
In my experience, Spotify just seems more accessible for people to use. Apple Music is fine but it still has that sense of "exclusivity" in the air which turns some users off. I guess it really depends on someone's music platform preference
Spotify was first and I’ve got my favourite playlists over there.
Nah. It's more about how the person consumes music. Your casual listener is way more likely to go for Spotify, with its playlist management, social and discovery features. An enthusiast who likes to "own" (I realise these days we actually own nothing with music streaming) every album released by their favourite artist along with lossless formats will opt for Apple Music.
I disagree with Spotify being "more accessible". Unless you are talking music and the fact Spotify has some free access. Otherwise Apple Music is most places Spotify is and it's all about how you prefer to consume your music. Most prefer "tracks on demand" which is why Spotify does so well. Especially with younger generations.
@@j800r_aswell In my opinion, I only like Apple Music for the lossless audio and the better payment for artists. I tried Apple Music properly last time, but the discovery functions for some nice genres is just absolutely terrible. Spotify thrives with their AI playlists.
If Spotify introduces their Spotify Platinum (lossless) subscription, I'm all in. No matter if it's a lot more expensive. I listen to music almost the whole day. :)
I prefer Apple Music for the better UI (at least on mobile.) Spotify's UI just isn't good. Lyrics UI looks horrible, some UI is hard to navigate... it's just not as easy to listen to the music that you want to listen to. Plus the Music app also includes music files imported from iTunes, so...
@@video0dotmov opposite for me, apple music is terrible to navigate and Spotify looks cool
It's crazy how many streams you need for $1k. Music is really undervalued for indie artists.
Wonder why
I actually would have thought they pay way less. I have Apple Music Family with 2 friends and my siblings. If we on average listen 2h/day/person and a song plays for an average of 2 minutes Apple has to pay artist 90€ and we are only paying 15 a month. And Apple has to provide all of the infrastructure on top of that.
And yet super overvalued for mainstream artists. That's the nature of having millions of people competing for the same job.
I say its fine. theres millions of artists bro. aint no way they finna have you get 1k for say like a 50k-100k streams. not realistic
This is the exact reason why I joined Apple Music from the jump gotta support artists in what ever way you can.
It’s also just a better platform for music playing imo
Buying was better
People don't understand how important sound quality is to some people. Listening to music is not all about playlists and recommendations and how everything happens automatically for you. You don't have to be an "audiophile" to enjoy high quality audio.
I also get infuriated listening to retards who only talk about "noise cancellation" when doing "headphone reviews", and only talk about loudness when talking about sound quality.
They're the same kind of people who would talk only about cameras while reviewing smartphones.
@@bdfwhhsb how is it better?
@@jackjack4412 many ways
An important difference he showed us but didn’t mention was the charts. Spotify peaked the tailed off rapidly towards zero. Don’t expect much more cash to come from them. Apple is keeping pretty steady. There should be way more rolling in as we go on.
2 key difference between the songs is the Spotify track blew up from a viral tiktok quite some time ago & the Apple Music song like I mentioned was placed in the huge Apple Music playlist and is still in it to this day
Been using Apple Music for almost 2 years and haven't regretted it ever since.
same
True I need to promote other platforms, I usually mention Spotify when people ask me where to hear my music. Best money I’ve made from my music was people actually purchasing the downloads from Amazon
Yup people sleep on actual sales. Some people still buy music
On Spotify, it also depends where the people are listening your music: you can make $17K per 1M streams if the plays are coming from South Korea. On the other hand, if your streams are coming from Turkey, you only get about $600 per 1M streams.
True
congrats on the morning brew shout out ! always appreciate a creator who sections off their ad reads, and this video was fascinating to watch. good job !!
Ohh that’s awesome I had no idea!! It was in an email?
@@LDreTheGiant yeah, a daily email thing. they usually cover business news but occasionally show off cool creators on RUclips
@@crutec126 if I join now will I be able to see it?
@@LDreTheGiant probably not but they have the latest issue on their site
@@LDreTheGiant I came from the morning brew to watch this video too!
Im not an artist but this is great insight. I think as consumers we start using the platforms that give back to the artists the most. Would you like to see more people using apple music?
Ideally yes but like I said, in the video, Spotify still has way better features for artists
Or potentially get Spotify to provide better services for artists (potentially by indicating our willingness to pay more in subscription fees if they pay artists more). Spotify has a great service for consumers - it’s a sticky platform and a lot of people don’t want to switch.
Ideally no...because now you are giving over control to a technology that you have no control over and actually has rights to your property & control of your money.
The same way people get on long lines and campouts to get the new Jordans, Yeezys(used to be), & iPhones...is the same way people need to line up to get there fav artists new album. Hell people do it to get into concerts...so why not for music.
tidal pays the most tho
Great job man. Even if the payout is quite limited, you still have the talent to repeat the process over again and even triple that amount for several years. Props.
Thanks for sharing!
Personally I feel like artists should at least get a penny per stream. Especially independent artists. A percent of a penny is cruel.
Honestly tho
Actually yes, so someone would appreciate atleast to hear a new song
the value is all dependent on Supply and Demand, and Laws.
Back when people bought cds you’d get a dollar per cd.
So if you sold 10 millions copies, 10 millions bucks and then you could tour and keep all of it .
Now? Labels take your lowly from all your income and barely even pay you what you get on streaming platforms as if they can’t keep up with the numbers
@@heythere6983 how can u equate the value of $1 : Album to streams per song without blowing out the economy
Doing numbers!💎🔥👏
My G 🙏🏾
My mind is blown right now…. All that bread for ppl listening to a beat?! Wtf am I doin with my life
This is why as a musician I use Tidal for listening - I want the money I spend on music going to my fellow artists as much as possible. Thanks for the info and congrats on the streams!
Unfortunately that's not the case the money is going into licensing a decoding process which no one asked to encode in the first place.. Deezer and Qobuz might be better choices if you want money to go into hard work and not into shareholders.
@@absolutium The only way for songs to be legally allowed on streaming platforms is for those platforms to pay for the licenses for those songs. Another thing is that I see majority of the comments here only mentioning money without realizing that if the money is coming from listeners and the majority of listeners arent on Tidal, Deezer or Qobuz then youre gonna see a real difference in how much your making Quarter to Quarter because thats how you get payed out in the music industry. Also everyones convinced that Spotify is the shitty platform cuz of how much it pays out, but no one has considered that most other platforms dont have the same user base as Spotify meaning the dollar doesnt have to get split as many ways on other platforms.
@@madeinjei Well..
To be accurate Spotify is essentially giving the listener 1/4 of a song.. if you read my reply again your are going to notice the response is about technical licensing not administrative bs.
@@absolutium The technical licensing is apart of the contract you make with, or contract but in place by, your label / publisher. You cant divide the 2 into different categories because everyone's picking from the same pot
@@madeinjei That statement is how I know you have no idea what is being talked about.. Look at GoldenSound video regarding MQA.. come back with your findings.
Also keep in mind that spotify pays 30% cut to apple for using their app store, Apple Music doesn’t have to pay shit since it’s theirs
Ohh wow good point I forgot about that
Spotify doesn't have to pay apple for hosting on app store.. they used to but not anymore. Only purchase made on the app are charged 30%. But if you notice you cannot anymore pay through the app for Spotify. Same goes with Netflix, Hulu etc etc streaming apps
@@sakethreddy4450 They're still paying tho. If they don't, their app will be removed from the App Store.
about 40k and 13k respectively on each platform based on 4m streams at the advertised rate.
Actual price they paid out, based on streams and paid amount:
Spotify rounded to $11700 and 4.5m streams thats .0026 opposed to their advertised .0033, which would take about 385k streams to get $1k.
Apple rounded to $24200 and 4.5m streams again. Thats roughly .0054(rounded, it was 53777 with repeating 7) as opposed to the advertised .01, which would tkae about 185000 streams to get $1k.
Moral of the story: giving guides like that is pointless because there will be this or that reason that you aren't being paid the full amount thats advertised
this. only amazon music unlimited pays more than 0.01 on average and not even that in some "poor" countries. researched this and amazon is best paying and surprisingly youtube music premium is second (0.008 average) best paying music platform in 2024, 3rd is tidal (which is advertised to be best paying) with average like 0.007 per stream. very hard to find info about this but your numbers were right about spotify/apple too.
You can actually upload your own playlists to Apple Music too. I think you do it through the music app
Digital music was encouraged by labels to regain control as far as the money. Years ago, too many folks were making a fortune selling their own music from the trunks of their cars and online, thus cutting the distributors and labels out completely. When music distributors and record store chains statred going bankrupt in the late 90's early 2000's, I saw where this was going then.
Its actually not the case, Digital music was looked down upon by labels at first and seen as unprofitable. Long story short, labels started making money off of licensing artists to streaming platforms and then later had to figure out a way to make more profit once streaming blew up so streaming profits came into play with how payouts were dealt out.
Hey, L.Dre, another aspect of this conversation is also the quality of the streamed music. Spotify is just now catching up to #HiFi standards (CD-Quality) for Premium and that's pretty sad when Apple Music is at all the way up to #HiRes (24-bit up to 192KkHz with proper equipment) lossless at every level. Yeah, LoFi is cool, too, right. It just seems that features are one thing, and while part of the experience, but when is the younger Gen going to 'listen' to music rather than just 'hear' it? We deal with this in our various degree programs constantly and it must be a learned trait - this can greatly influence those paying for music and making their voice much more potent in ensuring artists get their portion, too. Just a thought :)
BTW, where did your get those nice Sound Treatment panels - dang nice.
This is one of the most straight forward videos I’ve seen on RUclips. Thank you so much for not beating around the bush or dragging it out. Great info 🤙
Love these type of videos
Just streamed I Miss The Rain and it's soothing HipHop chill. Here's the thing, because you sound so much better at the Lossless level, in my car you got that 3peat triple play from me. At this point the Lossless experience is so far ahead of Spotify a lot of us just keep replaying our Apple Music Library. You're at the 16 Bit 48kHZ level. If you can level up to the Dolby Atmos surround sound sonic stratosphere, you'd get more streams. That's my 3¢ lol. 👊🏾
Distrokid is convenient but they keep reducing my songs from 24hz to 16hz CD quality for Tidal because I don’t pay to be audiophile verified
Seeing that they pay the best is it worth the $20 USD to be verified?
Damn I’ve been bouncing between these 2 for streaming for a bit and this was crazy helpful. Great video dude!
Thank you !
I hope these brands that sponsor you pay you well. You deserve it.
As expected the industry is very unfriendly when it comes to independent artists.
Kinda sucks when we have all the platforms and the technology in the world but big companies will still promote old and already established artist's
This was exactly why I moved from Spotify to Tidal. Props to big creators like yourself and Anthony Fantano for bringing this to people's attention
not gonna lie that's kind of a dumb play there. will you make more money; Probably, but you've also put yourself in a really small space meaning your opportunities to grow your platform as an artist are going to be virtually non existent, and if Tidal were to grow as big a Spotify it would only end up making Tidal have the same issue you have with Spotify.
@@madeinjei While your first point is obviously true (although "non-existent" is obviously a comical exaggeration), I see no reason to assume Tidal would change their remuneration model to be more like Spotify because they became more popular/successful.
Moreover, and I accept I could have made this clearer in my original post, although it will probably seem pretty obvious when you read it, my comment was from a consumer's perspective, not a creator's.
nah. I'd rather have Apple Music than sticking to Tidal. Tidal and Apple Music's royalty is close enough but subscription price is way different. Tidal is expensive as hell and paired with the fact that they have way less collection of songs. Not to mention the number of subscriptions. As an artist who wants to earn more, I'd rather do business with a platform with many subscribers than in a platform that pays a little higher but has subscribers a fraction of the nearest competition.
Also Apple music subscriptions has been increasing ever since after they launched the Apple One subscription which bundles every Apple's service. This was in fact the reason why I jumped from Spotify into Apple music and imported my Spotify playlist into Apple Music. It even become better after Apple launched the Lossless music in which Spotify is still yet to implement.
Why are you guys choosing one over another anyways just do as many as you can
@@heythere6983 fr
bro, where do you get this sick acoustic panels from?
Great video, awesome info 💯
Thank you
This video really inspired me to try even harder to make music, I’m new to music produce and I don’t know any chords progression, I made some simple lofi last year and it was really hard and I didn’t know where to earn money from music for small artist, now I know the possibilities to make a living of it , thank you Ldre!❤
As an artist - obviously I would like to see us all get the bag that we deserve. Yet, I see y’all saying “we should be paid” but realistically looking, those companies are just trynna make money and not justice fighters. In today world there are so many artists and musicians that sadly, it would be so hard for those companies to pay everyone more than that.
Which is why artists now days do a lot of live gigs ..
Thanks
Thank you 🙏🏾
I'm going for it L dre! Thanks for sharing these tips! ✌
Thanks 4 sharing this🙏🏾...the rates are sad...but it's encouraging to see you do it as an independent artist~
Why don't they use a scale to pay more for first thousands stream and then a bit less the more to 100k+ until you reach plateau of $/stream. That would help smaller artists, and maybe help to redirect money from big names to smaller ones.
That’s actually a good idea if they really did want to help smaller Artist but the bigger artist might get upset and they make them the most money so
when did big companies ever care for their artists
Obviously apple
Btw apple didn't pay my royalties for the last two months idk why. Is there anyone facing the same ?
@@SurfyStories it’s usually a 3 month delay for payments
Maths do be mathing
Always been an Apple Music consumer. I'm a traditionalist when it comes to my music and like to hold a collection. Whether that be physical or digital. Spotify is great for social features and playlists. Maybe even slightly better with discovering new artists. However, when it comes to music library management, Apple Music has them beat by a lightyear. Essentially, Spotify has no real library. Wanna organise your music? It's playlists or bust. Whereas Apple Music has all the same library management as iTunes. Meaning I have a stored library of many artists and their albums from Accept to Yes and everything in between.
It must be remembered that Spotify have a free tier, that many if not most users will be using. This will be a huge reason why their payout is far less.
Streaming platforms should definitely be paying the artists more, because without the artists those platforms literally have no product to profit from...!!! Great vid...!!! 👍
Supply and Demand, and Laws
@@madeinjei... Then artists should curtail their _supplies_ until their _demands_ are met! And streaming payouts aren't based on government laws, but on company policies.
@@helloxonsfan There are laws put in place that limit the amount of money a label/publisher/distributer is allowed to payout an artist per quarter, there's also a minimum, working in the music industry is still a something you would file a w9 for and thus there have to be regulations put in place so that it doesnt get abused, and as an artist when youre working out your contract your almost never going to get exactly what you want because youre technically compromising with your investor.
@@madeinjei... The payout to artist was actually a deal negotiated by the major record companies & the streaming platforms back in the early days if streaming. It hasn't changed since. Record companies still get the bulk of the share, while artists still get a pittance.
@@helloxonsfan its way more complicated than that. look at the credits of the song and then add a few more people and those are all of the people that need to get paid for the song. The record label has to pay all that out and the artist gets a little because every year the record label gives out a loan the artist that must be paid back by the end of the contract and sometimes our pesky little artist goes and spends that money on shit not related to the actual production of the piece ( when I say shit I mean things other than basic living necessities) so if for example they invest $100,000 to you, your song makes $200,000 but you spent $90,000 then your doing $200,000 - $90,000 and thats just pay back the loan cuz everyone involved in the production has to get their payout / royalty so $110,000 can end up turning into like $30,000 - $40,000 if u as the artist arent careful with how u spend the money
Apple also has lossless (close to) Tidal quality for the same price you would pay on Spotify.
Thanks for the info ❤
40,000$ on Apple Music and roughly 13,333$ on Spotify I’m guessing
I've went back and forth about whether I prefer Spotify or Apple Music. Experience is pretty similar but I'll be going with the one that pays the artist more. Easy choice at that point.
it makes me so sad you don’t get paid more 🥺 I love your music
You love him?🤭🤭
If you have the equipment, Apple lossless and their implementation of spatial audio with Dolby Atmos systems is a game changer.
Hey @L.dre what was the name of the dashboard where you track all the streams ? I can't find the video.
It's weird to see a Lo-Fi artist. As a "lofi connoisseur," normally the people that make it are very private. With potsu being my favorite lofi artst, I only know what he looks like
Keep up the Grind, bro!
On Napster you use to get $0.00 for a million downloads…
How much do you make from CD sales?
This really inspired me to start releasing more music, and maybe even getting into and releasing some lofi music.
Let’s go bro your beats or to hard for the hard drive
Drop your tracks TANK!
Thank you for the inspiration bro. Great vibe on your channel!
Appreciate you going there 🥂
Damn. I was very close with Spotify and very far off with Apple Music, since taking 100k streams for $1k brings to $40k. So I subbed :)
Anyway I knew these platforms didn't pay much but I thought they paid much much more, I mean artists release few songs a year or not even. I wish they paid more, they probably do pay more some artists that literally bring most of the users to the platform, still it sucks
Spotify has never turned a profit, so paying more per stream would be highly unsustainable
How long do you generally set your release date for? 4-5 weeks?
I guess the way I look at streaming is it’s great for established artists because you keep getting money every time someone listens to your music vs someone buying physical media and then your income is over. For up and coming maybe it’s a little spare change. I dunno. I personally will buy a record from an artist I really like and then listen to their music on a streaming service. I very rarely sit down and listen to a record but at least it’s a way to support smaller artists.
Can’t fight it so might as well embrace it and try to figure out how to make it work.
I believe that Spotify being in more markets and more paid subscribers means a large chunk of their subscribers are from low income countries where subscription fees are lower and the ad revenues as well so to compensate that they have a lower rate. Tidal being only available in high income countries pays the most. So the rate is decided by mix of paid subscribers from various income group countries. Ideally there should be different rate for streams from different countries to maximize artist compensation. RUclips does it for its videos. So you get paid more if someone from Europe or North America streams your songs.
The value balances out to whatever the world currency is which is the US Dollar. 100 Yen = $1.00+/- meaning that the Spotify premium package in Japan would probably be around 1,000 yen+/-. I just looked up the cost for Spotify in India and the subscription plans work differently which seems to not only have to do with the value of the currency. You said the subscription fees are lower in low income countries but I really just comes down to the value of the currency and how much it costs to buy things. for example although the cost of spotify premium in india costs 119 Rupees the cost of a bottle of water in India is 30 Rupees +/-, which if u do a little math would be the equivalent of $10 in Rupee
@@madeinjei I mean cost of a water bottle is not Rs 30 its Rs 20 ( 25 cents ) for brands like Aquafina and Kinley. If you buy a full 15 bottle set it costs Rs 15 (19 cents) per bottle. I dont know whats that in terms of Purchasing power parity. So just like you said its Rs 119 which is approx $1.5 per month which impacts artists income. India doesnt even give you volume as competitors are way cheaper giving you music subscriptions at 1/3rd of the cost.
Spotify close to 11k and Apple around 27k
Shoutout to Morning Brew who brought me here, never listened to any of your songs but great vid!
That’s awesome thanks for watching !!
Hey, cool video. I stopped at 00:58 and was just wondering how exactly Spotify would be in the 4th palace before RUclips Music when YTM pays 0,008 which is more than the 0,0033 from Spotify.
How many years did it take to get 4 million streams?
Musicians are much better off than painters. No matter if a picture gets viewed a billion times, the artist does not get a cent. Musicians gets royalties all their lives and their estates keep getting them for another 70 years after death.
I think Spotify's payout is fair to be honest. I'm from Sri Lanka and Spotify is so much cheaper in comparison to other alternatives. I do have so much respect for Spotify for making music accessible to so many people as well.
Spotify costs $1.44/mo individual and $2.30/mo family, whereas Apple $6.49/mo individual and $9.99/mo family. Students on Spotify pay less than a dollar $0.72/month.
Apple can keep it's higher margins since many users who choose Apple music does so mainly because of the Apple eco system. Spotify targets towards its audience with it's free plans and low fees internationally. I've noticed how the prices are so much more higher in the US for spotify premium compared to Apple as well. So I guess Spotify has a team to look in to international pricing based on demand and the financial aspects of specific countries.
bruhh been waiting for this Love you for being legit💖 much love from South sudan
0:57, last time I looked 0.008 is bigger than 0.0033, and 125,000 streams to get to $1000 is better than 303,000 views… The ordering of the revenue from each platform is incorrect, if that table’s values are correct then it should be #1 Tidal, #2 Apple, #3 youtube, #4 Deezer, #5 Amazon, #6 Spotify and # 7 Pandora…
The thing is Apple Music can have better features and it's only a matter of time until they do. I think they could easily overtake Spotify.
Agreed
Apple Music has awful UX.
@@MathieuLLF no it’s actually very clean simple and to the point yet still elegant like the rest of apples designs . I have found the ai recommendations clutter crap though
It also depends on the distributor right? Bc each Distributor service has a different cut?
How much for 196,000 plays on my song 10,000 coming from apple music and the rest from Spotify the majority like 65% coming from Brazil by ad supporters
Thanks for being so transparent about your earning. How about you tell us how much money you've made from the Distrokid affiliate link?
With the affiliate link I make $10 per sign up
@@LDreTheGiant I know how much you make for each sign up. it's $10. It used to be $5. Since you like throwing out numbers... I'm curious about how much money that Distrokid affiliate link can bring in after promoting it for a couple years. I came across a RUclips producer who was honest and said he makes more money from the Distrokid affiliate link than he does from the music he has on streaming site's. You need 25,000 streams on Spotify to make $100. You only need 10 people to sign up to Distrokid through your affiliate link to make $100. You do the math! LOL It's called the "Distrokid Affiliate" link hustle. LOL
@@notsogood9449 ahhhhh I see what you’re saying lmao yeah I guess that could be a good hustle last time I checked I have made like $23-25k from it over the past few years which ironically is the equivalent of 4 million streams on Apple Music lol but affiliate marketing in general is a whole other source of income. I still make a few hundred a month by just having my gear linked to Amazon in my description 🤷🏽♂️
L.Dre is always an inspiration! More blessing Bro!
One question I always have is if the count is per click or per full song played or at least like 10% or 20% played.
I always wonder that
good info. dope upload
i just thought i would give you some extra insight into the numbers. I've studied them myself.
1. like you said the free Spotify tier pays less royalty ( way less ) than the premium streams. also, the amount you receive from a stream depends on the country where the song was listened to. for example, a stream in the USA will pay more than a stream in a developing economy like India.
2. a big reason why a company like Spotify is paying out less than for example apple is due to the fact that for apple and amazon as well the streaming site is just a side hustle to keep people in their ecosystem. their core business isn't in music so they can make a significant loss on the music streamed. for Spotify, this is just not the case. if you look into the financials of Spotify they are basically always losing money. Tidal is also having big financial losses year over year.
3. just like the streams from free Spotify users the free trial users for apple music also have a lower payout per stream than the normally subscribed users.
4. its also important to mention that the average payouts per stream only are meant for independent artists, the label for big artists negotiates rates with the streaming services separately.
Apple does not sell Apple Music at a loss. They do choose to give a higher percentage of their Apple Music revenue to artists, which certainly impacts profit margins, but theirs is not a loss leader company culture. Spotify’s major advantage is global ubiquity without platform bias catering to a much broader population at all economic levels.
I joined Spotify last year and it's the best subscription ever of my life
Well Apple has other sources of income than apple music not like spoitfy. Also spotify has much more artists so their money needs to be spread along way more artists. There are 3 times more users but there are more than 3 times more artists on spotify than on apple music
Lofi Dre😅❤. Awesome video, do you have a video explaining what vybe village is?
The reason is apple music is just for paid subscribers. So if you got 4 mill on Apple, all the 4 million listeners are paid. On the other hand if u got 4 mill on Spotify, more than half of them would be free listeners.
I recently realized how much BUYING music matters. Please be sure to buy some of your favorite artists’ songs/albums! Sales mean so much more than streams, especially for smaller artists!
Thank you for sharing! This was really helpful🙏🏻
I’m guessing ~$12k from Spotify and ~$40k from Apple Music
I think Apple music wouldn’t give that much but more than Spotify at least
Solid guess
Got a new song dropping but Spotify really needs to pay a bit more even go up to 0.005
It's funny because it is sponsored material where Videos about products or services that are independent because they are the creators of the video and there is some relationship with the product or service according RUclips policy ❤
I think he needs a part 2 to this video breaking down step-by-step what he did
whats up with yt music, i prefer to switch from spotify to yt, because of the benefit to minimizing commercials and you find artist there, which aren't on spotify/apple music because they release before streaming was this huge.
I need help with something.. I think distrokid is trying to rip me off! I made a withdrawal by cheque almost 6 moths ago ..the cheque never got here! I've sent lots of emails but they keep telling me if after 6 months I don't cash the cheque, they'll cancel it and I have to pay a $35 fee to them!!! How is it that I have to pay for their mistake? U don't get it!! They claim they can confirm they sent the cheque but can't track it smh !! How do I know they even sent it? Aren't they trying to scam more money out of me??? Help pls
I can assure you Distrokid doesn’t try to scam people. Sounds to me like the check probably got lost in the mail and it would be fault of the mail courier. $35 fee sounds pretty normal to me tbh
Its not about the money ..quality of service am worried about ..don't they have to make sure the mail gets to where it needs to get? I want to know my fault here..thanks
@@kevinbeats3814 I’d say the main thing is that you waited 6 months to contact them. If it was sooner maybe they could do something but that’s a long time
That's not the case I started sending them messages two weeks after the withdrawal was made ..been talking to them for 6 month..before, they told me to keep waiting or cancel it ..I decided to wait because I was told I wouldn't have to pay anything after six months ..now they're telling me I have to pay regardless.. That's when I flipped
congrats (I'm following on spotify btw) - my opinion is it's a lot easier to promote on spotify than with apple music, being an unknown it's next to impossible to get heard on apple music. With spotify it's doable.
Thank you brother!
I believe producers think that getting underpaid from one source is undercutting talent and robbery, but the internet is a big place and posting music through multiple platforms is how it works. Would it make sense to pay $100 for a Spotify subscription when its a vast market? It works both ways and the streaming avenues are plentiful at a reasonable price. Video streaming services are similar yet revenue streams can be accessed from a garage compared to the hands on that it was 15 years ago.
The real question is, if you didn't upload to the other service, would you get 9 million views?
In terms of marketing, if the objective is to get people to listen to your music... why advertise to a specific streaming platform? I don't understand the strategy behind that. Especially if you want to get genuine numbers.
I like to market to all platforms but budget wise let’s say you run ads it could be a better use of your money to promote towards the platforms with the most users
@@LDreTheGiant I see, but then you get into things like the payola scheme and other things the industry does for a particular artist. That's just too much work for the little reward unless you find learning how things work fun. I think if you do it, do it for the purity of the content you put out. you may be getting low numbers in one location, switch to that location to promote to boost your numbers there. You might be right tho Dre.
Thx for the inspiration Dre ✊🏾
Have you ever gotten any problem with ditrokid
Based on this list. It seems Pandora is the best platform for artist bc pays more, right?
I’m happy I use tidal ig based on the chart. Like the moral sanity of knowing I’m using something like that is pretty nice
Thanks for the insights. What about Performance and Mechanical Royalties?
Love the authenticity in your content bro!! ☯💙
What about tidal? How much do they pay?
ei man, how can you get the money from distrokid? you said it's 3 month delay but
from spotify to you or you mean the distrokid? if you can explain because i make music and use distrokid too
thank you
That's some really good advice for musicians. But for listeners I think Apple Music or Tidal is the better option if you want to support the artists.