@@argumasch663 My friend I'm not American and neither are those news American. I'm simply stating the facts that the Leopard has had a bad combat history. I agree, Abrams aren't flawless either, and it has taken a while to adapt to the modern tank battlefield which usually consists of fighting insurgents. You should try to be more objective sometimes. Your bias is shining brighter than the sun here.
It’s the 2A4M. It’s Canada’s modernised version of the Leo 2A4 with external composite and slat armour. Hence why it might look very different. Looks similar to another NATO Tank. The British Challenger 2 TES (only from the hull rear and turret rear/part of sides though). It has slat armour there too.
Best shot I've ever seen from a tank
Yeah!!!
Me watching the same video on repeat for the 57th time. "That hit it!"
Ah, if I puffed my chest I could withstand it. Assuming it missed entirely. By two kilometers.
I was expecting the block on the right would be hit.
Never let them know ur next move
-sun tzu
@@yecto1332nice one! That hit it!
Damn thats awesome look at the shockwave and the projectile flying like rocket from hell these tanks are accurate
Brutal
At first I expected the Icarly intro to play lmao
Damn that's too fast
Deutsche Gründlichkeit ;)
Dieser Kommentar ist aber net so gut gealtert
That concrete was very, very evil!
Took me a moment to realize what "MPAT" means, it's just HEATFS XD
Nerd shit aside, beautiful shot form the tank
HEAT-MP. Increased fragmentation effect over HEAT.
ya Germans know how to make a killing machine
ever since German tanks are the best
we know that.
T34 laughs at this comment.
Leo has some issues. It's not the best.
@@argumasch663 nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/germany%E2%80%99s-leopard-2-tank-has-had-so-much-trouble-and-death-syria-83631
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5332247/The-4million-German-tank-embarrassed-Syria.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_2#Combat_history
@@argumasch663 My friend I'm not American and neither are those news American. I'm simply stating the facts that the Leopard has had a bad combat history.
I agree, Abrams aren't flawless either, and it has taken a while to adapt to the modern tank battlefield which usually consists of fighting insurgents.
You should try to be more objective sometimes. Your bias is shining brighter than the sun here.
Wie geil.Sagt Richtmeister 42 TBat Huzars of Orange B Esqadron 2 Platoon B Tank.
0:06
Best MBT no question
thanks for talking over it
what is there to hear?
@@MrPwnurface23 if that's a serious question, please slap yourself.
Missed the block but it was cool to see.
It hit.
Thats what i talk about, tanks are synonim of destruction!!! ):D
Ya Bud
Sounds Canadian
yeah the canadians use the leopard 2
Very impressive. Poor Armata trash
LOL, you'd know without a doubt. World Class authority :)
@@Slaktrax ??
so ... let me get this straight.
You want to tell me, if i am standing with my rifle opposite of the tank behind a Beton-block, i stand no chance?
mh.
If all you have to fight a tank is a rifle, you stand no chance whatever your cover lol
@@AAArnoldwhat if ur rifle is premium gold tho
That looked like a dm11 he shell
Despite its not a Leopard 2
It's very similar to the exhaust outlets of a leopard2.Probably modernised.
It’s the 2A4M.
It’s Canada’s modernised version of the Leo 2A4 with external composite and slat armour.
Hence why it might look very different.
Looks similar to another NATO Tank. The British Challenger 2 TES (only from the hull rear and turret rear/part of sides though).
It has slat armour there too.
Why does this round have a smoke trail behind it