Blue flame means complete combustion. I think u need a larger reactor to produce enough gas to heat it up and it should be insulated (the reactor). I was searching for the most energy efficiency biochar reactor and I think this can be the cleanest, I mean lots of examples use 50% of the wood to heat up the other 50%. Biochar is a nice way to put back carbon into the ground
Very good video, I am a biochar producer using rice husk biomass. Can your system use this biomass? and how is it scalable for semi commercial production?
I don't know. Tjis don't matter because the goal of this test it's just see how it's work and electricity is simpler to control. Long therm goal is to use generated gas to heat it's self and just keep woodchar and oil because it's safer and simpler to store. Concentrated solar energy can be a solution too.
@@PyroEvil I don't think you will ever have a positive exergy gain from pyrolysis. Pyrolysis is for vectoring energy, so like, imagine you have a surplus of energy, maybe you have some solar panels or something. Well, in that case, pyrolysis makes sense because you are converting a surplus of energy into energy vectors that can be easly stored and used. Otherwise, a conventional steam boiler with co-generation (so combustion) is the most efficient way to heat up a space, gasification should be left for energy production and pyrolysis for energy vectorization. I could be wrong thoe
The tar is biocrude, heavy oils & wax. Can be distilled and refined. All usable. Some gas, diesel and jet fuel in there too.
Blue flame means complete combustion.
I think u need a larger reactor to produce enough gas to heat it up and it should be insulated (the reactor).
I was searching for the most energy efficiency biochar reactor and I think this can be the cleanest, I mean lots of examples use 50% of the wood to heat up the other 50%.
Biochar is a nice way to put back carbon into the ground
Would like to see more about ths, as I am working on the same area of expertise for my master studies
CAN YOU CONNECT ME I HAVE SAME MAJOR PROJECT FOR FINAL YEAR B TECH
Génial ton vidéo! vraiment intéressant!
The 1st pre heating condensate and rest of the fuel are acidic. So the copper plates and tubes might not last long.
Nice video. However we use the fast pyrolysis plant Fpp02 for recycling plastic & wood waste. It turns out fuel for hot water boilers.
Thanks ! Fast pyrolysis with hot sand ? It's a homemade or commercial one ?
@@PyroEvil, hi.
We use fast ablative pyrolysis. We dont use hot sand. Reactor power 500 kg/h. Commercial use
can you tell me more about it ?
Very good video, I am a biochar producer using rice husk biomass. Can your system use this biomass? and how is it scalable for semi commercial production?
electric heater's wattage ?
Did you think about turning the final gas into liquid via catalytic reactor ? Is it possible at that scale ?
Nice set up btw
syngas is mostly hydrogen gas. It's not going to liquefy unless you put it under pressure. you don't need to crack it like it was oil products.
So basically wood gas, right?
Sir, what is yield you get?
So how much energy is required to heat the pyrolis container
I don't know. Tjis don't matter because the goal of this test it's just see how it's work and electricity is simpler to control. Long therm goal is to use generated gas to heat it's self and just keep woodchar and oil because it's safer and simpler to store. Concentrated solar energy can be a solution too.
@@PyroEvil I don't think you will ever have a positive exergy gain from pyrolysis. Pyrolysis is for vectoring energy, so like, imagine you have a surplus of energy, maybe you have some solar panels or something. Well, in that case, pyrolysis makes sense because you are converting a surplus of energy into energy vectors that can be easly stored and used. Otherwise, a conventional steam boiler with co-generation (so combustion) is the most efficient way to heat up a space, gasification should be left for energy production and pyrolysis for energy vectorization. I could be wrong thoe