Canards the moat obvious difference, Su35 don’t have them because they enchance radar cross section. And Su35 was made to be semi stealthy unlike su30.
@@macakucizmama831 Absolutely agree the SU 30 MKI has a bigger RCS thanks partially due to canards. Also, SU 35S frame is made up of higher ratio of composites than SU 30 MKI.
Тут наверное большинство Индийцы отписали под видео. Я сам из России. Поясню почему появился Су-35. там было всего 2 тематики Все знают наработки МиГ-1.44, Су-37, Су-47, Су-57. ну и Су -30. Су-30 в эксплуатации. Дело в том что Су-30МКИ то есть Индийский вариант превзошёл все выпущенные и выпускаемые Су-30 да же Российский Су-30. Потому и появился Су-35 на котором очень много всего что принадлежит поколению 5 Если брать все истребители Су то идут они так Су-57. Су-35, и замете следующий из су идёт Су-30МКИ То есть он да же Российские Су-30 превосходит. Вот такая ситуация и именно по этому и появился Су-35.
If you can avoid canards you should. The Su-35 would already be one of the most agile fighters ever. Canards behind the cockpit are good for carrier jets for short take off, but unless it's a carrier jet, pilots have mentioned that they can block the view when looking back. The Su-27 is already a highly agile design. The Su-33 is more so and for carriers. Adding vector thrust is more than enough really. The Su-37 demonstrator had both probably for stability. I'd go with the Su-35. I think that's the height of Russian 4th gen design.
I'd MUCH rather see Russians implement targeting pods over TV. EOTS, IR, whatever. Even more important..? What if they could've had AESA for the same price as TV..? Something used ≥0.0001% is a waste of weight, complexity & cost. Hell, even 2D TV for very high AoA costs too much energy. 3D TV is even heavier, more expensive & more things to break... Bc on top of cost, weight and scarcity of utility ... You always orient your jet to "PULL" Gs (meaning 2D TV is best). Making it obvious why LM used 2D TV on the F22.
@sanjay59741: Its taller profile, canards, and lack of composites contribute to higher RCS. It will never match the SU 35S. In addition, the SU 35S is combat-proven and has gotten upgrades for features lacking during the Ukraine war. SU35S is the best non-stealth fighter jet in the world today.
Nonsense comparison. The Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺. The Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+.
Su-30MK is the export version. Su-30MKI is the Indian upgrade to the Su-30MK with many airframe and avionics upgrades, like canards and avionics from India, Israel and France. Every MK model, like the Su-30MKA(Algeria), Su-30MKM(Malaysia), Su-30SM, SME and SM2(Russia) are all derived from the Indian upgrade Su-30MKI. India also provides parts and spare support to Malaysia, while providing avionics to the Algerian variant. The Chinese Su-30MKK is however not derived from the Indian upgrade.
You forget the SU 30 MKI was the best version of the SU 30 for the longest time. Russia couldn't afford the SU-30 for awhile. Russia would then aquire SU-30. They were considered inferior to the MKI. Instead catching up with the MKI Russia came up with the SU 35. Which is considered better than the MKI. Only now the latest SU 30 (SM2 of I'm not mistaken.) Is considered equal to the MKI.
Su 30 MKK was based on Su 30 MKI (All based on Su 27 flanker). The avionics and some other electronics are the only difference between the two. They are almost the same design and has very similar capabilities.
No, the Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺. The Su-30MKK is a fighter built by Russia for China with parts of the Su-35. Also the Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+.
The original comment and reply were better than the entire video. There isn't a single video on YT explaining the DIFFERENCES (that matter)... Between variants of the Cy-27 ... just stupid similarities that don't even matter.
There are few mistakes in the presentation: SU 30 MKI cost about 100 million dollars. This is because it is unlike any SU 30 which were made in Russia. It has Israeli avionics and once upgraded will have an AESA radar. However, the SU 35S is a superior fighter jet because of its composites, more powerful/reliable engine, larger range, better radar, and simpler architecture. It is also combat proven fighter jet, unlike the SU 30 MKI.
What you are doing is Comparison not VS between two Fighter jets! Next time correct the title of video to Comparison. Anyways 30 mki is proven in IAF and is best dog fighter today. ☝️😊
थोरा कमी है भारत मै इंजन भारत बदना चाहिए सुखोई 30 का 4%9kN रूसी इजन लगाना चाहिए बात कर कै रूस 100इजन भारत बात मान जयेगा भारत वनाना चाहिए 190 kN +190 kN 300 kN आसपीड दौरेगा
@@ismailnyeyusof3520 Su-30 doesn't necessarily has canard wings. Older Su30 don't have them. The real difference is that Su30 has the panel to tank in the air while Su-27 and Su-35 don't. Other than that all these planes are based on the same concept and are almost the same.
Nonsense comparison. The Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺. The Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+. The SU-35: 1) Has a younger design. It is stealthier, its RCS is low due to usage of radar absorbant coating, composite material in airframe and lack of canards 2) It has got thrustier engines which incorporates 3D thrust vectoring as opposed to 2D thrust vectoring on MKI. 3) Its empty weight is also less. All these things make the aircraft more agile. 4) Su-35 has a top speed of Mach 2.25 compared to Mach 1.8 of Su-30MKI. 5) Its internal fuel has more capacity = more range 6) It can super cruise with a decent payload, while MKI can't even in clean configuration. 7) IRBIS-E radar is way too superior to the Bars radar deployed on MKI.
Thanks now I know which one to buy just need a few hundred million
SU 30 MKI carries Brahmos. WOW !
Su-30 is prettier 😁😁
Canards the moat obvious difference, Su35 don’t have them because they enchance radar cross section. And Su35 was made to be semi stealthy unlike su30.
@@macakucizmama831 Absolutely agree the SU 30 MKI has a bigger RCS thanks partially due to canards. Also, SU 35S frame is made up of higher ratio of composites than SU 30 MKI.
Malaysia Top Gun is watching....✌️😊✌️🇲🇾
Тут наверное большинство Индийцы отписали под видео. Я сам из России. Поясню почему появился Су-35. там было всего 2 тематики Все знают наработки МиГ-1.44, Су-37, Су-47, Су-57. ну и Су -30. Су-30 в эксплуатации. Дело в том что Су-30МКИ то есть Индийский вариант превзошёл все выпущенные и выпускаемые Су-30 да же Российский Су-30. Потому и появился Су-35 на котором очень много всего что принадлежит поколению 5 Если брать все истребители Су то идут они так Су-57. Су-35, и замете следующий из су идёт Су-30МКИ То есть он да же Российские Су-30 превосходит. Вот такая ситуация и именно по этому и появился Су-35.
Y el su-30m2 🙌
Thanks
If you can avoid canards you should. The Su-35 would already be one of the most agile fighters ever. Canards behind the cockpit are good for carrier jets for short take off, but unless it's a carrier jet, pilots have mentioned that they can block the view when looking back. The Su-27 is already a highly agile design. The Su-33 is more so and for carriers. Adding vector thrust is more than enough really. The Su-37 demonstrator had both probably for stability.
I'd go with the Su-35. I think that's the height of Russian 4th gen design.
I'd MUCH rather see Russians implement targeting pods over TV. EOTS, IR, whatever.
Even more important..? What if they could've had AESA for the same price as TV..?
Something used ≥0.0001% is a waste of weight, complexity & cost.
Hell, even 2D TV for very high AoA costs too much energy.
3D TV is even heavier, more expensive & more things to break...
Bc on top of cost, weight and scarcity of utility ...
You always orient your jet to "PULL" Gs (meaning 2D TV is best).
Making it obvious why LM used 2D TV on the F22.
Canards also increase radar signature
A better comparison would have been SU35 vs SU30SM
MKI is Indian. The airframe is the only thing that's Russian. Some missiles too.
yeah sure lol)) and Russian engines are also...indian))))
Su-30MKI fitted with AL-41FS engine and AESA radar will match the Su-35.
Not really, su35 has lower radar cross section
Also 3d thrust vectoring ,avionics etc su30sm maybe is close to su35 , but su30mki is an export version. Export versions are never as good
@sanjay59741: Its taller profile, canards, and lack of composites contribute to higher RCS. It will never match the SU 35S. In addition, the SU 35S is combat-proven and has gotten upgrades for features lacking during the Ukraine war. SU35S is the best non-stealth fighter jet in the world today.
Wow.. Nice i Like Russian fighter jet sukhoi and mig and nuklear weapons.. 👍
Nonsense comparison.
The Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺.
The Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+.
Su-30MK is the export version. Su-30MKI is the Indian upgrade to the Su-30MK with many airframe and avionics upgrades, like canards and avionics from India, Israel and France. Every MK model, like the Su-30MKA(Algeria), Su-30MKM(Malaysia), Su-30SM, SME and SM2(Russia) are all derived from the Indian upgrade Su-30MKI. India also provides parts and spare support to Malaysia, while providing avionics to the Algerian variant. The Chinese Su-30MKK is however not derived from the Indian upgrade.
You forget the SU 30 MKI was the best version of the SU 30 for the longest time. Russia couldn't afford the SU-30 for awhile. Russia would then aquire SU-30. They were considered inferior to the MKI. Instead catching up with the MKI Russia came up with the SU 35. Which is considered better than the MKI. Only now the latest SU 30 (SM2 of I'm not mistaken.) Is considered equal to the MKI.
Su 30 MKK was based on Su 30 MKI (All based on Su 27 flanker). The avionics and some other electronics are the only difference between the two. They are almost the same design and has very similar capabilities.
No, the Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺.
The Su-30MKK is a fighter built by Russia for China with parts of the Su-35.
Also the Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+.
The original comment and reply were better than the entire video.
There isn't a single video on YT explaining the DIFFERENCES (that matter)...
Between variants of the Cy-27 ... just stupid similarities that don't even matter.
Russia does not use the MKI.
There are few mistakes in the presentation: SU 30 MKI cost about 100 million dollars. This is because it is unlike any SU 30 which were made in Russia. It has Israeli avionics and once upgraded will have an AESA radar. However, the SU 35S is a superior fighter jet because of its composites, more powerful/reliable engine, larger range, better radar, and simpler architecture. It is also combat proven fighter jet, unlike the SU 30 MKI.
SU-30SM-2 / R-37M mounted the BEST.
SU 30 MKI is being manufactured in India, it's one of the best looking fighter jet amd very capable with terrifying weapons
Genial
It is said that the Su 30 mka Algerian Russian is better
Su-30 MKI
💋💗💔💌
What you are doing is Comparison not VS between two Fighter jets! Next time correct the title of video to Comparison. Anyways 30 mki is proven in IAF and is best dog fighter today. ☝️😊
थोरा कमी है भारत मै इंजन भारत बदना चाहिए सुखोई 30 का 4%9kN रूसी इजन लगाना चाहिए बात कर कै रूस 100इजन भारत बात मान जयेगा भारत वनाना चाहिए 190 kN +190 kN 300 kN आसपीड दौरेगा
Both same
Su30 has canard wings, Su35 doesn’t have any.
@@ismailnyeyusof3520 Su-30 doesn't necessarily has canard wings. Older Su30 don't have them. The real difference is that Su30 has the panel to tank in the air while Su-27 and Su-35 don't. Other than that all these planes are based on the same concept and are almost the same.
Nonsense comparison.
The Su-30MKI🇮🇳 is just the Export version of the Russian Su-30MK🇷🇺.
The Su-35🇷🇺 is a 4++ generation fighter while the Su-30MK and MKI are 4+.
The SU-35:
1) Has a younger design.
It is stealthier, its RCS is low due to usage of radar absorbant coating, composite material in airframe and lack of canards
2) It has got thrustier engines which incorporates 3D thrust vectoring as opposed to 2D thrust vectoring on MKI.
3) Its empty weight is also less. All these things make the aircraft more agile.
4) Su-35 has a top speed of Mach 2.25 compared to Mach 1.8 of Su-30MKI.
5) Its internal fuel has more capacity = more range
6) It can super cruise with a decent payload, while MKI can't even in clean configuration.
7) IRBIS-E radar is way too superior to the Bars radar deployed on MKI.
@@CriscCiaddu I just described the look difference for a rookie to recognize them. You are correct.
@@maciejbrodecki9667 oh ok, sorry for misunderstanding you✋
U don't know nothing about su30..
Both planes are trash 🗑️🗑️.
user : Su-30MKA algeria en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-30