Fuji XF 55-200mm Vs XC 50-230mm - The Great Fujifilm Zoom Lens Shootout
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- In today's video, I'm taking the Fuji XF 55-200mm & XC 50-230mm lenses into the Forest of Dean to try them side by side.
For many, the XC 50-230mm is the only chance they are going to get to venture into those focal ranges. Sure, it's not as good a lens as the XF 55-200mm equivalent but, really, how well can it stand up to its big brother?
The answers might surprise you...
Let me know what you think about the images from the XC 50-230mm in the comments below...
Website: www.stevemello...
Instagram: / steve_mellor
Facebook: / spmellorphotography
Twitter: / sp_mellor
I’m using xc50-230 for my landscape photography for over one year now and think it is a good and light lens. It is sharp, once I even had printed (~80 cm longer side of the picture) a cropped photograph taken on the widest aperture and it looks fine... Main disadvantages are in my opinion: AF which sometimes can be wrong particularly while photographing in fog or against the sun and is slow for photographing moving subjects, plastic built and lack of sealing (I don’t expect for such a cheap lens to be weather sealed but at the same time I already have some dust in the lens which is quite visible while using narrow apertures on plain subject like sky) and some chromatic aberration in the corners on contrasty scenes
EDIT BTW You manage to get some nice images while comparing the two lenses. Most reviewers don’t take nice pictures while comparing lenses 👍
Thank you ever so much for your comment about the pictures.
Glad you like the lens. It really is amazing but yes, the build quality is nowhere close to the other Fuji lenses.
This is what i was looking for, since i m a beginner and an owner of xt 200 , thanks a ton mate for this video
Really glad I it’s useful for you. Thank you ever so much for commenting.
Been waiting for a video like this since i got my xc 50-230, i don't use it enough to warrant the cost for a 50-200mm, i paid £145 for it shipped and its in perfect condition.
I think a lot of people will be in the same position. Certainly, for me, the XC is good enough for now as I don’t use the 140-235mm range that much.
Wow, where from as that would be absolutely perfect for me
The 55 200
was one of the first I got, I have several of the really fast primes and also the 16 55 but more often than not its the 55 200 I reach for , its proved to be a cracking lens.
It really is, but if it’s not in your price range (or not just yet) that 50-230 is phenomenal considering the price. I was expecting it to be much worse.
Alright, this video seal the deal to me. I was wondering what xc lens I want to buy, because I don't have that much money for any xf lens, or other brand as well. I love landscape photography, and I was thinking if the difference between xf and xc is not that much, I'd like to buy this lens straight away. I have X-A5, which is, you know, amateur camera, but for me, as a hobbyist in photography, is enough, and I want to take one step out from my kit lens, 15-45 mm. And I was doing street photography the other day, but very shy to take pictures too close to subject. This lens is just perfect to me, at least for now. Thank you for reviewing this lens.
It is a great lens. Even now, I’m really impressed with it.
@@SteveMellorPhotography I finally bought it 2 weeks ago. And I'm happy. The autofocus is not the best, it struggle a bit on a low light, but still, in the right circumstances, this lens is very good.
Loved the comment "sometimes ... all the trees look exactly the same" 😂 As being passionate about shooting in the forest, I need to say that I have the same issue myself over and over again. 😉
I love being in woods, such a calming place to be. I live near some where the deer roam and if you’re lucky you get to see them, if not it’s the birdsong, trees and I love the smell of woods!!
I love the way you deliver. Keep doing the great job, mate!
That's so kind of you, thank you ever so much :)
Wonderful video, thank you so much.
Just got our first proper camera (the Fuji X-S10) and we want a bit of zoom without breaking the bank too much further. We live in a lovely location and want to get closer to the amazing wildlife and distant subjects.
Your videos are great, so interesting, informative and beautiful shots too…
Glad it was helpful! Thank you ever so much for the comment.
Hi Steve thanks for an informative video, I've just today purchased the 50-230 second hand on ebay. I was apprehensive about it but you've put my mind at ease. Thanks
I'm glad you found the information useful. I'm working on another video where I'm looking at it in conjunction with the 70-300mm too. I'd love to know how you're getting on with the lens.
Thx for this review. For the price, i think the XC lens is a winner, and if you have Photoshop, you can achieve almost the same picture as the XF lens with a bit of adjustments.
It really is a good lens. That's why we keep it around.
This was super helpful, thanks so much for taking the time & effort 🏆👍 Paul
Thanks for the comment, and sorry for the delay. I’ve got another one in the works with the 70-300mm added as well.
Thank you very much for the effort behind making this video.
It’s a pleasure. Thank you for your comments :)
Thank you!!!! Heheeh. Would want to purchase the 50-230 for the price but no aperture ring, as what you have said, it will not be fun enough hehe.
Well, if you’re going to spend the money on the 55-200, you’re best bet is a second hand lens. You can pick up some in excellent condition for under £500
Hey Steve, nice video and honest too about the two lenses! Thanks you this video, I'll probably save a lot of cash! :) Thank you again!
My pleasure. I’m dying to do the same thing with the 70-300 but I can’t get hold of one 🤣
Maybe after my next product launch.
Thanks, I found this really interesting and useful. Beautiful photos, too!
Glad it was helpful! I do find, sometimes, that the information out there is either way too technical or not really enough to give people an idea about the lenses. I hope that others find this useful.
I've never been impressed with the tele zooms by fuji. I do have a 50-230mm mainly because it was going really cheap and I needed a tele zoom with AF. The 70-300mm looks promising especially as it takes an extender
I like them. I was impressed with the 50-230 based on previous experience with several Nikon zooms. The real question, I suppose, is whether the 55-200mm is worth double the price and that all comes down to utility at the end of the day.
The 70-300mm sounds very interesting and it’s likely something my Dad would get. I expect the optics to be pretty similar to what’s already available, though. Whilst I have an extender for the 100-400mm, I don’t like to use it if I don’t have to because of the loss in light.
I’m debating buying the 55-200 atm. I have the 16-135 and am not sure I’ve made the right choice. It was suggested along with a 35f2 when I got my x-t4 (all used kit) after trading in my canon kit. I had previously had a 70-300 canon so wanted more reach than the 18-55 however undecided whether to go 18-55 and 55-200 to cover all bases! I could probably swap it if I’m quick as only just purchased. I have the xc16-50 on my x-t30 and although it’s xc not xf it’s a great lens. The images from it are so good. I do love an aperture ring though so could swap for the 18-55. Such a dilemma as I feel the 55-200 would be good for my upcoming trip and some of the subject matter but I need to make a quick decision. Thanks for the video
I need to make another video of this because I have recently got hold of the 70-300mm and, for me, this is better than the 55-200mm…. But, not by much (which I know doesn’t help).
Here’s what I think: between 200mm and 230mm, you don’t get much extra in terms of reach. Using any tool to blow up that image (Lightroom’s enhance is very good, as it Topaz Labs Gigapixel) means you can zoom into the picture without loss of pixels. Between the 200mm and the 230mm, the 200mm IS a better lens and you can pick them up second hand.
My mum uses the 55-200mm and gets some fantastic results, certainly better than the 50-230mm.
But, the 70-300mm is just a better lens. It seems to be faster, sharper, no difference in weight and you can add a teleconverter if you need extra reach later… But, you’re less likely to find a second hand one and I had to wait about 4 months before it arrived… But, it is good enough that I am considering selling my 100-400mm.
I can’t fault the idea of the 18-55mm and 55-200mm. They are both incredible lenses and that extra reach will make a difference, especially if you ever want to try wildlife shots.
@@SteveMellorPhotography thanks for the great reply. I would definitely prefer the aperture ring as that is part of what I enjoy about using Fuji lenses and right now I can’t afford the 70-300 new and as you say not so many around used. I’ve always been happy buying used gear so might continue to keep eyes open for a 55-200 used. My problem with trying to see image quality was because I’m trying to zoom in on an iPad as I only have free Lightroom and it just pixelates everything! Thanks again for informative reply
Were you using a dji pocket while you were explaining the tree? The tracking looks good, what camera you are using?
OK so I figure that out when I see the shadow. Thanks
It is, yes, but I’ve modified it slightly so I have a very light, very portable camera rig.
If you’d like to see exactly what it looks like, I’ve got a behind the scenes video: ruclips.net/video/pdYLGl3hRo8/видео.html
I’ve had the Pocket since it was released and I’m largely very happy with it. The focusing sometimes plays up and that’s something they don’t seem to have quite fixed with version 2, so I’ve held back on upgrading.
Would have expected covering moving subjects in the comparison too so that we could do an informed decision
I will probably have one of those out this year. I’m trying to get my hands on the 70-300 for an update on this video and it will likely come then.
Any difference in af or ois speed between the two for sports shots?
I wouldn’t touch the XC lens for sports shots. The XF is much faster at focusing.
However, you might want to look at the new 70-300mm instead.
@@SteveMellorPhotography thanks, I sort of thought a 200 with an extension would be more flexible then a 300 but yeah. $$$
Well, the 50-200 doesn’t support the teleconverter. The 70-300 does. That changes the game somewhat.
Good video
Thank you ever so much. Looking forward to being able to make some more.
Hello, I use the DJI osmo pocket but have always found it difficult to get good audio. Can you give me some advice on how to make the audio better?
I suspect if its like my setup, he uses an external mic.
I am sorry for the late reply. Chris has it right below. You need to use a separate microphone. Personally, I use a Rode Wireless Go system, but if that's overkill, a cheap-ish Lav mic (tie clip mic) should do the job. Remember, you need the separate audio connector for the camera as well.
Unfortunately, the battery completely died in my Osmo Pocket, so I am looking for a new camera. It looks like I might be moving towards one of the new Sony ones.
Thank you for the reply. You are totally right, I am using a Rode Wireless Go system for the sound. You just can't scrimp on sound quality.
Great video with some sound advice. I mainly shoot Street Photography but also some Landscape, Seascape and evening a little wildlife, just birds and squirrels. I’m also on a very tight budget and on my last camera I done well enough with a 70-300 Sigma £100 lens though when my camera etc went for a swim and my mate borrowed me his old Canon 6d with a 15 year old 70-200 L Series lens the difference was plain to see but for my Fuji I think the older xc lens should be fine with what I save going towards another lens or even just travel expenses
You can get some great shots with that XC lens. Yes, the 55-200 and 70-300 are better optically but Mum was using the XC for years and had got shots that won some acclaim at her Photography club.
@@SteveMellorPhotography Being unable to work I’m on a tight budget so it’s a no brainier really, especially for the times I’ll use it, just need to pay off my 35mm first 🤣