How UFOs Work by Jack Sarfatti - Prof Simon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- UFOs are real. Physicist Jack Sarfatti was asked by the C.I.A. 'How do they work?'
Jack has dedicated his life to answering that question. Today, he describes, for you, how a UFO uses warp drive technology using meta materials built into the crafts hull, to travel at faster than light speed though space and time. This is REAL physics.
Please give this film a thumbs up to tell RUclips you are interested and subscribe for more fascinating films.
Join a team of investigators on Patreon FOR FREE. Also get early access to new films, advertising free, behind the scenes, polls and open non censored discussions with me and top scientists. JOIN TODAY HERE:
/ profsimon
Jack Sarfatti BIO:
Dr. Sarfatti studied with Hans Bethe and other leading physicists from the World War II Atomic Bomb Manhattan Project in the late 1950s and early 1960s at Cornell. MIT physics historian David Kaiser credited Sarfatti in the best seller “How the Hippies Saved Physics” as a leading promoter of the importance of quantum entanglement as early as the late 1950s, leading to the quantum computer industry. The CIA and US Military agents asked Dr. Sarfatti to work on the physical explanations of our consciousness and how flying saucers work. This was over fifty years ago, and he has solved both problems by applying battle-tested mainstream physics of Einstein’s theory of gravity and quantum mechanics. Dr. Sarfatti also significantly influenced President Reagan in formulating the Strategic Defense Initiative. One of Dr Sarfatti’s predictions on control of gravity for space flight and directed energy weapons is part of a 250 million dollar WARP FUSION REACTOR program at Lawrence Livermore Nuclear Weapons National Laboratory. Dr Sarfatti is now working on adding consciousness to artificial intelligence neural networks at the 3-nanometer scale of Apple Computer’s M3 chip, as well as the control of gravity with small amounts of energy for space flight, making rocket/jet propulsion obsolete and allowing practical interstellar travel to habitable exoplanets..
Nah... I think you have been blinded by his charisma and scientific word salad.
not me
Jack knows how UFOs work, but can't work the iPad.
Makes total sense.
hahaha omg I'm dying...
He also thinks it's E-Lan Musk.
@@speedycpu An E-LAN is a multipoint-to-multipoint transparent Layer 2 virtual LAN service that connects two or more user network interfaces (UNIs), providing full mesh connectivity for those sites...🤔
😜
Whereas, Lon, also known as the protease La, is a homo-oligomeric ATP-dependent protease, which is highly conserved in archaea, eubacteria and eukaryotic mitochondria and peroxisomes. Since its discovery, studies have shown that Lon activity is essential for cellular homeostasis, mediating protein quality control and metabolic regulation.
@big-baby-buddha honestly he can totally know how ufos work and struggle using iPad since they are not the same thing, I may know how my car functions but struggle to work the radio . Sorry your insult doesn't make sense
Sarfatti being called on by the CIA for help explains a lot. 🤦♂️
they were asking the same questions...he was a smart man to contact
Sorry Prof but I'd say he's a bit 'Upton Park' as they say. Two stops short of Barking :)
Being a Londoner I know it well 😂😂😂
😅
hilarious...you are welcome to your opinion
Is his work / equations etc.. peer reviewed anywhere?
Stop looking for an authority figure to tell you what is true and what Isint. Figure it out yourself ffs
@@TheDragonRelic lol science is peer reviewed thats how it works and also jack isnt exactly telling us much of anything, he wont even state materials name
@@WookiRahh peer reviewed papers are bought and paid for and published via academia. The scientific method is dead. Look up right now “academia is a cult” and you’ll see the nonsense they push
@@WookiRahh hows that peer reviewed science of the CV Vax scandal going for you?
How would one “peer-review” the theories and methods?
the way you done this video in person with him and this Ipad ......GOLDEN ....this is such a good format ....love to see more like this interview with Ipad ...not seen that done quite like that before ....That just the kind of authenticity in videos i like ...
He is a brilliant scientist, you did an excellent job of keeping him on topic! lol. His hypothesis does seem very plausible, I’m curious about how the paradox’s are over come? Brilliant Prof thank you 🙏
Glad you enjoyed it!
Paradox’s aren’t permitted by the universals laws, otherwise it would have collapsed
Thank you Prof Simon Holland and brother Jack Sarfatti for everything y'all do.
Please never say -yall again
Thanks Bob
@@rodqueen2910 please never comment again.
Back in the 90s me a a couple of friends had a band with your name. Cheers!
They are powered by the same magical substance that fuels all life on earth... money!
Thank you so much for having Jack Sarfatti as your guest. I love the guy!
Our pleasure!
Fantastic interview. Thank you so much. The ability to just be in the room with the both of you in this real, raw manner was awesome. 👍👍👍
Glad you enjoyed it!
☝Elooooonnnn ... You've been a naughty boy 😂👍
This needs to be a meme.
Ive listened to Sarfatti talk for 3 hours. Never made any point other than hes much smarter than all humans past or present. He never provides any actual information.
its hard to interpret his mathematical physics into a film that is understandable...i certainly tried hard for you viewers
@@ProfSimonHolland you are greatly appreciated and even he is appreciated, just very difficult. Especially for a regular moron like me.
@@ProfSimonHollandtry harder
@@ProfSimonHolland ….can you provide the mathematical physics for those of us who can understand it?
Prof; where has your scepticism gone? You're reporting this as if it is all confirmed data.
good point....this is very much jack sarfatti show
In terms of real world physics....... very amusing! ;)
I agree with the "observations" but they fail misserably on expaining the "how". Metamaterials and "warp drives"......... phft!
Its been a while since i left a comment but I had to sign in to give this series a thumbs up. It's been brilliant watching your channel over the last few years Prof. I know you have many interests and I think I remember you once declared yourself done with the UFO/UAP stuff a few years back but I have to admit it's what always brings me back. You have brought in many angles to look at it through (believer, debunker, skeptic, agnostic) with an open mind. Your channel is a great help for me dealing with my own childhood and adult experiences of the phenomenon or phenomena in terms of helping me not fall into one ideological pitfall or another (hopefully!). Its a journey, its a process and I've thoroughly enjoyed vicariously joining you in your journey and process.
It looks like you had a lot of fun with Jack, thanks for sharing.
Peace x
The UAP are effectively “disconnected” from the Local Gravity Field. As such, their “irrational” movements make complete sense when you take this into account.
Yes. Gravity is packaged in a plasma bubble. The vehicle moves around by a mechanism they wont disclose.
@@John-wd5cb lets just call it the arc of the covenant?
Getting goose bumps professor 😮 are we on the edge of a breakthrough? Better round up the goats 🐐 😂❤👍🇬🇧
I heard recently that Plasma could be conscious, a very long time ago I encountered in my house at the time what I thought was ball lightning. It traveled along the ceiling in a dead straight line having first appeared coming through the out side brick wall. The orb was the size of a football and seemed to be made up of a central core, with two outer. The colours of the second where colours of the rainbow spinning very slowly, the outside was grey/ silver and translucent. It was the most Fascinating thing I’ve ever seen, it was travelling at no more than about a foot a second and then disappeared straight through the next brick wall. It was totally silent but the room seemed to be static,but as I watched it I could swear that it had some kind of intelligence, I know still to this day that sounds absolutely mad but will never forget those minutes watching it and or the feeling that it actually knew I was there. As they say Strange but True 😳
My 3 brothers and I have seen the orbs , but always outside, on 6 separate occasions over our lifetimes. I think some of them are drones, some may be holograms; but they are real. During 3 sightings - they were huge...WV and AZ.
What you observed was orbs. Orbs are the visual representation of Souls that are disembodied. They were not spacecraft or anything solid and tangible, because they are made of something other than matter.
Experiments to control plasma with the thought. Yes. I think, the 70's
@@jamesarnette1394here we go again with the floating soul-thing. What he did see was in fact what we call ball-lightning. A misterious natural phenomena that can display some characteristics of life. That is all we know. The rest is pure speculation
In my opinion, you figure out how something works when you create a model, design an experiment that shows your model is correct and you can build on your model to show that your model was not a fluke but a true understanding of nature.
Not by claiming you are right, xothers are wrong
Not by claiming you are the only one who understands this…
That by claiming others are not as smart as you..
I don’t think Sarfatti understands anything about UAPs or flying saucers. There is nothing he said can be shown to be wrong. The essence of a scientific argument or model
JUST WONDERING PROF SIMON IF YOU HAVE CHECKED TERNCE HOWARD'S THOUGHTS OF GRAVITY, MAGNETICS,FLOWER OF LIFE ETC... JUST A THOUGHT FOR YOU TO LOOK INTO. THANKS FOR YOUR THOGHTS CHEERS!
I have explained that the occupants of the craft do not get "splattered" on the inside of the craft any more than the Voyager probes got ripped apart during their gravity assist maneuvers - there are NO inertial forces, in fact, all are free-fall events - KUDOS for saying what needed to be said!!
But consider, for a craft just hovering in 'Earth's gravity', the occupants would be weightless. To accelerate upward, all mass under the dome becomes the "lift mass." All the massive stuff like the power supply, life support systems, cargo, and occupants all contribute to the necessary lift mass. If for example the lift mass is 50 times the mass of the upper dome (where the magic actually happens), then the occupants, along with the rest of the lift mass, would be pressed up against the underside of the dome at 1 G, while performing a 50 G upward acceleration of the entire craft.
Thank you Simon, Jack has it figured out!!!
CERN whistleblower said that they can send and receive messages to their main office in the future, with a communication device that spins quantum paired particles one way or another, (while the counterpart spins the same direction in the same machine in the future/ past) which they translate to binary, ect. ect.
i think they are onto something
Ask Jack . Future aliens or Future humans please Simon
we talked about that....both is his answer. universe is teaming with life but the ufo seem to care what we do with nukes...why? are they future us?
Jack thinks they're humans from the future...at least the ones that told him to study time travel when he was a kid.
@@ProfSimonHolland well I'm open minded as to either, but wouldn't future human also be interested in our time and Nukes especially if that's what they might be looking to correct that possibly damages human DNA in future times. It seams a little belittling that human in the past or the future isn't/wasn't capable of working this out .
@@ProfSimonHolland Or dimensional us?
Oh Prof, this is embarrassing to watch. Never trust anyone who talks about themselves in the first person. Maybe this guy is the greatest mind on the planet. Or maybe not.
Agree, not the prof's finest work.
interjecting my views was hard...i wanted to give this time to jack and share what he knows with you.
@@ProfSimonHollandI understand. I’m open minded about the possibility of the phenomena. But some of the ppl in the limelight in the ufo community like Jack seem to be a little obsessed, with themselves maybe. Idk
Look at this point, we know for a fact that there are major holes in the current "unified theory" and there are definitely some kind of arial phenomenon. There are physics breaking objects flying around our military bases and other places clearly documented. There is no explanation for this behavior, and any hypothesis to attempt to explain it should at least be considered and not ridiculed.
That's such a weird arbitrary line to draw about someone to categorize them as someone you should never listen to.
Interesting you are in a protected bubble.
jack allways says his name as no one knows more than he does and no one listens to him, for knowing what he knows talk to jack and climb his beanstalk to the light cone
You could have asked him about Mark McCandlish´s fluxliner drawings to see if it makes any sense to him. Perhaps you can still do it by email. Cheers!
Great idea 🎉❤
Jack always makes me laugh, you must have had a lot of joy there!! 😅🛸👽
With, or At?
I want a puff of what you two are on.
Jack's not on Twitter. He's on X!.😂
Thanks so very much, Professor! Your content is always very interesting and unique! ❤
My pleasure!
Can't figure out how to use the most basic paint application while claiming to describe how UFO technology works. Great job! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂😂 I know, I was waiting for him to announce he was building a warp drive but after seeing him struggle with the iPad I went and made a cuppa tea instead
not his field of expertise
@@ProfSimonHolland I was awaiting that reply. Neither is his knowledge of so-called UFO technology. Because how the hell would anyone know? You're just making things up.
@@JesperHellvik you don't disprove you just mock, lots of you in this comment section, it is a shame
Jack Sarfatti has a point. All the 'Jack's' I know are indeed quite chubby.
I really enjoyed watching this video, I do believe. 👍
Thank you very much
@@ProfSimonHolland I often have online conversations with scientists who do not believe, and will not believe no matter what evidence I put in front of them, I find it very frustrating. But honestly it warms my heart to see scientists that do. 😇🛸
I'd love a more in depth physics class on what he's talking about. Simplified explanations and hand-drawn examples don't really do it for me.
you are brilliant and in a tiny minority that understand mathematics
this guy is saying absolutely nothing
my fault....not jacks
I love the passion, but hopefully we can get something a bit more substantive next time.
Let's just assume we have a grasp of the underlying fundamentals like light cones and relativity. Okay so, where does that understanding lead us in regards to his theory? What is the basis of this understanding? What exactly _would_ be debated in his claimed scenario? (he said nobody wsnrs to debate him) What sorts of things is he postulating? Can anything be experimentally demonstrated? What are the mathematics of those postulates? What _actual_ insights can he represent to us and/or yourself? Where do we go from here? What's his goals? What does he want or encourage from the community? etc etc.
We need a _much_ more concise explanation from Sarfatti regarding _what_ exactly he's trying to say. There's a lot of buzz words being tossed around like metamaterials and anti-gravity and yet none of it has been adequately explained whatsoever. If he's afraid people will steal his technology or whatever, we can still dive pretty deep without revealing the actual specifics of the design itself, if that is actually the reason he's being so vague. Give us some degree of insight into the process, the math, or, even better, show us some proof! Did he create any working prototypes since gaining this understanding? Wouldn't it be possible to give us a basic demonstration or proof of concept without actually detailing the process? Let's see thrustless lift, inertial dampening, anti-gravity or anything meaningful and revolutionary!
I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt, and like I said I can appreciate the enthusiasm... _However_ in a space like the UFO/UAP community, we have to be extra careful of disinformation and misinformation agents. It's not just a theory or paranoia, it's a factual reality that people like Richard Doty exist and have been not only spreading disinformation intentionally for years at the behest of government organizations, but in fact would pay people to also spread disinformation according to his agenda thereby creating an entire web of misdirection and disaccreditation to vast swathes of the community and the community as a whole. We also know these individuals often sprinkle truths into their propaganda in order to bolster their apparent legitimacy. And I have to admit, in this video Sarfatti has been saying a whole lot of nothing while also adding a touch of unverifiable but seemingly "true" bits while trying to make a nebulous sort of overall point which has as of yet remained elusive.
It's not uncommon to have the community as a whole be disparaged and made the fool by having people act with complete and obvious rediculousness so as to potentially tarnish the image of the community as a whole or specific individuals. Often times if someone is publically outspoken and onto the right track, a three letter organization will try to inject one of these agents into that individuals inner circle so they can be discredited by association when the agent starts rambling about unhinged and rediculous things or intentionally burning bridges with other reputable individuals in the community etc etc. You get the picture, my point being Dr. Simon, be conscientious about who you associate with as there is often a domino sort of affect. It can be juvinjle at times, but the fact remains that who you associate with can and does have an impact on how you're viewed by the community and its members.
I would ask for an explanation with a little more substance, or better yet some some demonstrable proof of Sarfatti's claims.
Regardless thank you for everything you do Dr. Simon thank you for all the interesting content! I probably came off a bit aggressive or overly critical in this comment but I want you to know I still have stark appreciation for what you're doing and I thoroughly encourage you to continue!
This guy has absolutely no idea how they work like everybody else.
He absolutely does. He is just a gatekeeper. You create a field, you package gravity and you move around, if you get to find ways not dieing from the radiation it's even better. That's just it. Simple stuff.
not true...he has a working theory..unlike most folk
Well if he knows then why doesn't he create something to prove to the world?
@@jonhayes9750 no money in that for the big cheese.
@ProfSimonHolland please enlighten me Profeesor.
Hi Professor Simon, were you convinced by what Jack had to say?
i think jacks physics is spot on but im not sure about crashed flying saucers from the future.
According to Sarfatti, Mars is sending a photon signal into its own forward light cone. That makes no sense.
Well that's probably a description of something not directly related with how a ufo flies.
@@John-wd5cb Its a description of Martians sending light signals into their future light cones. I guess they are Martians, so they can do any magical thing they like, but that is not science.
jack needs to come on here and answer your question
What needs an proper explanation that most can understand is statements like “metamaterials need to interact with near-field virtual photons between the artificial matter atoms in the layered 2nd quantum lattices” also what is “active mass” and how does this warp spacetime around a craft. How “fast” can this field warp the space time around it to control the crafts fall along it newly made geodesic? If the warp effect is fast enough then aren’t you limited by the speed of this effect and isn’t that the speed of gravity which is the same as the speed of light?
Obvious sleight of hand/mind going on. 😁
why wouldn't ET interact with humanity or have they in the past ?
maybe because they are not physical beings.
1:48 okay cool go ahead and build one, we'll wait
I'm so lost regarding the picture he drew, what!?
I'm assuming that, knowing beyond a doubt how UFOs operate, Mr. Sarfatti is building one in his garage at this very moment. Are you kidding me? Virtually everyone interested in the subject has assumed for years the same general concepts that Mr. Sarfatti has apparently just stumbled upon. And, gasp, some of them aren't even Physicists! What a cringe moment.
Probably a lot of fun having Sarfati there😂. Toptip don't try to get what he is saying. Nobody ever could.
you hit the nail on its head....but thsts my job..
.making difficult science, understandable
Jack "The CIA told me" Sarfatti.
Nonsense....................................
hold jacks beer
Hahahaha oh shit! Hi "Elin". Get em Jack. I love this man.
Time variance provides the lift. Also the pull, of gravity. Difference in the speed of time yields acceleration.
a bit cringe
but interesting
Explaining how a ufo works but can't figure out an iPad.
Yeah but have you ever flown an iPad! I sat on impact to take off, now I how have a broken screen and and and extra crack in my butt! 🥲
If I didn’t have personal experience in this area, I might agree but for context, I’ve produced dozens of live events (corporate, scientific, social, political, educational, etc.), some of them with Nobel laureates in their fields of science, engineering, medicine, et al., and for real, they’re usually THE WORST with basic technology (e.g., getting a laptop to output to a projector, scanning a QR code to install an app). It baffled me at first, I’m thinking “bro, you’re the CTO and chief engineer for an aerospace company and you don’t know how to play a video in your PPT presentation?” But then I realized that’s actually pretty common with the genius types to be ultra adept at what they do but they get tripped up by basic stuff. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don't understand why the need for living pilots exists?
Why go to the lengths of creating something so advanced and then having to waste time and resources keeping a primitive meatbag alive.
Sarfatti rightly teaches that the best form of disclosure is just to search for the truth from a problem solving perspective. Disclosure becomes obsolete the more IQ outweighs the party we're waiting on doing the disclosing, like waiting for a little kid to tell us he's got lollies in his pockets its a waste of time as we've already cognitively mapped out the permutations to even care for his interpretation. Thank you to the both of you for sharing!
4:48 star trek out there foreal so wonderful to see two men of your age having fun in real life not letting the world put you down hope you brilliant guys stick around, we (young ppl) need you. Life could be like a star trek universe if we get past the bullshit
isnt the thing that gravity is effected or bent by mass, velocity equals mass, so if u spin something fast enough it will create mass and then have an effect on space time, So if u spin something with enuf power it will change space time?
Yep I totally brain busted that and came out with absolute dribble. I'll need to do some research lol 😂What a fantastic guest 👏👏👏👏🍎
Your not building my spaceship aka Elin. 😅
It's effective FTL, the ship itself does not move locally relative to the particles in a thin boundary around the outer surface of the fuselage.
listen to the TimeLord
at 3.31, what is 'K' you don't say? is it the 'gravity field', is it the mass, i thought that was M? There is the gravitational field, G of course, where do you get the idea of a field for gravity, are you going to say gravity is not a result of mass bending space time? this sounds like psuedo (or wishful thinking) science to me. I am not too stupid to understand, please be clearer with your descriptions, i can't call them explanations because i don't think they are. By the way i have observed uap in person along with a friend some years ago, the same sighting being reported in a local paper independently. So i am not a sceptic in those terms but i am sceptical of the science described here.
It's the coupling constant between the stress-energy tensor and gravitational constant - your bang for buck basically. To cut a very long story short, Sarfatti's missing out on the benefits of the Lazar leaks; the strong nuclear binding force holding protons together against their mutual Coulomb repulsion into stable atomic nuclei - formulated in the standard model in terms of virtual charge pion exchanges - can also be considered in terms of spacetime curvature, only much stronger than gravity as a function of mass-energy density per the standard field equations, and much shorter-ranged. As Riccardo Storti's work shows, if this field is comprised of a wave-like component then it may be amenable to harnessing via amplifying waveguides, essentially blowing bubbles of strong nuclear force in a conformal layer around a craft - warp bubbles thus basically very steep but highly localised gravity wells, in extrema able to spontaneously form Schwarzchild black holes; i've posted video of one such example on my channel, however Lazar, exclusively, has predicted such objects since the late eighties, hence i strongly suspect the key to field effect propulsion is within the atom; basically _nuclear physics,_ hence the ongoing relevance of the DoE and nuclear-related defence classifications, UAP interest in nuclear facilities etc. TL;DR - there's tantalising reasons to suspect that one of the great leaps being covered up is that all the ordinary atomic matter around us may actually be held together by a gravity-like field with a much higher coupling constant than gravity as we know it at cosmic scales per Newton and Einstein - that _everything_ is made of tiny interacting warp bubbles, basically - and that this field can be accumulated and amplified up to macro-scales. Control group documentation allegedly thus distinguished this field in terms of 'gravity A', in contrast to the weaker gravity B we're familiar with. Extrapolating further, it may be that the latter is simply an aggregate residual effect of the former, truly fundamental, gravity field, and that this connection may hold the key to the long-sought quantum theory of gravity, but this is getting into more speculation; the Lazar and Storti explanations you can look up for yourself..
@@MrVibrating that has at least given me an idea of the concept that is being put forward to explain the uap propulsion systems, it's a long time since i delved into tensor matrices, the maths is a bit much for me! thanks for the pointer to the Lazar and Storti stuff i will check it out. You certainly did a better job than this guy!
@@MrVibrating
I too have heard of the Strong Nuclear Force bubble idea. You might be interested in Larry Reed's papers on quantum gravity. "Confinement of Light: Standing Wave Transformations in Phase Locked Resonator".
Reed calculates the wave function of matter undergoing acceleration and works out the Lorentz-Doppler transform needed to reverse the motion of matter in a gravitational field. The process could be engineered using metamaterial phase conjugate mirrors to form a resonant cavity which can manipulate the matter-wave of the vehicle as well as the stress energy of the surrounding volume of space. Reed proposes a model of gravity as the spectral energy density gradient of phase locked quantum harmonic oscillators (masses) which minimize potential energy of mass by acceleration of gravity and spontaneous clock synchronization of the wavefunction. This also explains time dilation and length contraction and how to manipulate them to negate tidal forces of acceleration.
@@MrVibratingLazar talking about Gravity A mixing with Gravity B waves sounds a lot like phase conjugation, which can involve metamaterials and layered media.
4:09 “it gets very very complicated…”. Ya think?
Jack Sarfatti is engaging and charismatic, but after a short time it becomes clear that he's an insufferable big head. The diagram he eventually cobbled together demonstrated nothing that wasn't already self-evident about traversing sidereal space. He seems confident of his insights, but they're wrong. There are two modes of propulsion employed by interstellar craft. The smaller craft that we occasionally glimpse - disks, orbs or what have you (Beamships) - employ anti-gravity drives for propulsion. There's no warping of spacetime (or any other mathematical concept which has no bearing on reality). Gravity and electromagnetism are one and the same, and by ramping up the Teslas everything within a toroidal field starts to lose mass and inertia. An efficient shape for craft using this sort of drive is disk-shaped, which is why so many of this type are seen. Anti-gravity propulsion has been achieved more than once by terrestrial inventors, but their work was soon stamped on, and occasionally so were they.
The motherships to these craft employ propulsion of another kind, employing the Principle of Non-locaity. Essentially, by imposing upon a ship and its contents and inhabitants the frequency harmonics of the desired destination, the ship will almost instantaneously manifest at that destination. Again this has been done on Earth (the Philadelphia Experiment) but unless the frequency harmonics are measured and imposed with sufficient precision, the results can be catastrophic.
ETs communicate with one another across vast distances using muon neutrinos, transcending time and space. Radio waves are considered by them to be useless and toxic. For this reason, projects like SETI are backing the wrong horse.
If Jack Sarfatti really had the keys to the cosmos then he would be quietly working for some three letter agency rather than peddling this garbage. But then maybe he is, and this is all mis-information. I'm fairly sure he thinks he's Rick Sanchez.
wow....you have a big insight into alien technology
Your best video yet!!!
Wow, thanks!
this is thee worst explaining of anything
You mentioned some thing at the end. People that keep the secrets are not helpful in these matters, but other than discoveries, most of what has come out, was already in the public domain before it was produced. Just like the New York Times video. Because it’s so hard to keep secrets do you think a lot of these things are hiding in plain sight?
good point...yes
Idunno. This guy seems a little off.
Meta materials exist in small amounts and in unique lab enivros. Prove to me now that we can produce them in larger amounts, or get off the pot..
every stealth aircraft is either coated or constructed of metal materials. made in the uk by BAD systems and sold worldwide...its a major defence export from the uk... meta material are real and made in bulk
why is there no light bending from the G field?
Are you going to disclose what you think happened at Rendelsham Forest, as you have hinted ? It' not really fair to say something like this and then keep it quiet...
the issue is classified information...all the info is in each film...you need to watch them and read between the lines ...but if pissible, we want to do a hugh timeline
Jack never gets the respect that he deserves.
none of that has anything to do with electro-gravitics !
probably not
Dr. Steven Greer says UAP's are vulnerable to EMP's, and the US gov. has been bringing them down for decades.
maybe
Great video Simon and Jack 🤍
That explanation of the ufo traveling to mars…. was painful.
the physics of twisted light cones of past and future is interesting.
@@ProfSimonHolland it’s more about geometry rather than physics…
Jack is the best…fun, not boring, I’d love to have a drink with him…shalom Jack..🛸🛸🛸👽👽👽🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
Seems easy enough. Build a working setup then.
So if we have the knowledge where is the proof we can use ut
Too much rathbone in childhood
Rathbone rocked best Holmes
Can Jack answer this question: is Time fundamental or emergent?
of no importance to the problem at hand
@@JackSarfatti Gravity propulsion, on the other hand, is very non-local..
@@JackSarfatti Time as Fundamental:
• Definition: If time is fundamental, it means that time is a basic, irreducible aspect of reality. It exists independently of anything else and is not dependent on other phenomena.
• Implications: In this view, time flows continuously and uniformly, providing a universal backdrop against which events occur. This aligns with the Newtonian concept of absolute time. If time is emergent, it suggests that time is not a basic entity but arises from more fundamental, timeless laws or states. Time emerges from the interactions and relationships between underlying physical entities.
• Implications: In this view, what we perceive as the flow of time could be an illusion or a byproduct of deeper, more fundamental processes. The notion of time would thus depend on the context and scale.
General Relativity, Closed timelike curves, Quantum Gravity, the block universe all assume time is fundamental. It is an important aspect to understand what temporal method is being applied to the question of time travel. Some theories, such as certain interpretations of quantum gravity, suggest that time could emerge from entanglement and interactions at the quantum level.
If you are indeed a man in the know it should be a simple question of one or the other.
My reply has disappeared 🧐
A laser pushed shunt?
Can you explain how they disappear from time?
they are outside our visible range of past or future
current and frequency
That's not new captain kirk had warp drive on the enterprise
jack , I love your Dogs.
our two dogs
In the early 1980s, a journalist wrote a novel about witnessing a so called contactee in South Africa, that communicated with a race of people, humans, from another Universe via a radio type contraption. They explained that Universes touch each other like bubbles of soap, they can travel through the touches. They explained that their Astriel Vehicles use a magnetic drive, and they use the magnetic highways between Stars to travel. A few years ago, NASA released the information that they found magnetic highways throughout the Universe between Stars etc......These people were called the Koldasians, from the Planet Koldas. But of course, it was only a story by one man.
this oldman is a real life Sheldon Cooper so to speak
Bang on. It would also explain the transmedia characteristics of these craft too. This not only doesn't break any physics law but a warp bubble has openly (reported) been made in labs. With that in mind and the fact that MIC tech is at least 100 years more advanced, there is a good argument that the Tic Tacs are manmade.
As much as I want to believe what Mr Sarfatti is saying, I can’t get his relationship to the intelligence community out of my mind. Now I know his role in the IC can’t and doesn’t disqualify his assertions, it does elicit doubt in my mind. Nevertheless, his claims “fit”.
yep! the thought expt. of how fast the experience of 'knowledge' of an instantly removed object is transmitted leads to the aether being all objects being in instant communication. obvious for the past decade or two - ref Fred Hoyle.
Quantum physics tells us one 'thing/partICLe' does exactly the same or opposite; somewhere in the universe' how do we know that unless it was local, would we presume that.
So why can you only see these things though infrared not just ufo s but all the orbs people see, every video on RUclips is in infrared man made object's that is what they are
Omgoodness Jacks message Elon Musk was hilarious….🤣
Brilliant stuff … Thanks Prof, and Jack. Just wish I had the brains to make it all work, but not for military purposes 👍👍👍
Thank you professor, hoping soon the truth will be everywhere so it can no longer be denied by any nay-sayers.
I think this is woo woo. But I don't believe aeroplanes can fly so there.
Nice Castle. Chateau-de-Beynac?
absolutely
Colonel Karl Nell is the next David Grusch ... Amazing times!
interesting
He doesn't seem like a whack job at all!
Thank you Mr.Sarfatti and professor Simon!!! I’m your biggest fans!!
Yeah hidden Technologies they all need to be released