Magnus Carlsen Age 29 vs Chess.com’s Maximum Computer 25
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 ноя 2020
- With Chess.com's release of a new 3200-rated chess engine, we see Magnus Carlsen Age 29 face off against one of the world's best chess computers! What do you think will be the result?
💰Get up to 15% off your order of any Chessnut product using the code "CHESSU-SEE" or the link "www.chessnutech.com/CHESSUSEE" at checkout.
✉️ Get the insider's scoop on all things chess - delivered to your inbox: sendfox.com/chessusee
~ Free Discount Codes ~
💰Get up to 15% off your order of any Chessnut product using the code "CHESSU-SEE" or the link "www.chessnutech.com/CHESSUSEE" at checkout.
💰 Get 16% off your order of any World Chess product using the code "chessusee16" or the link "bit.ly/chessusee10" at checkout. Valid on any order over $150 USD. Valid through April 22, 2024.
💰 Get 10% off your order of any World Chess product using the code "chessusee10" or the link "bit.ly/chessusee10" at checkout. Valid on any order over $150 USD.
💰 Get 7% off your order of any World Chess product (Less than $150) using the code "chessusee7" or the link "bit.ly/chessusee10" at checkout. Valid on any order less than $150 USD.
💰 Get 10% off your order of any item from the Royal Chess Mall using the code "chessusee10" at checkout. bit.ly/royalchessmall10
💰 Get up to 45% off the full retail price of the iChessOne by backing the Kickstarter campaign here: bit.ly/iChessOne
💰 Get 30% off your order of the Walnut Chess Piece Storage Box by using the code "chessusee30" at checkout or the link tidd.ly/46zQIBr
✉️ Join my email list for discounts!
sendfox.com/chessusee
📱 Socials
Website: www.shopchessusee.com
Instagram - / chessusee
Twitter - / chessusee
TikTok - / chessusee
Twitch - / chessusee
Chess.com - www.chess.com/member/rogueai3160
Lichess - lichess.org/@/RogueAI3160
👕 Merch
shopchessusee.com/collections...
Shop my favorite Amazon gift ideas here:
www.amazon.com/shop/chess-u-see
This is the new chess computer on chess.com which allows you to play against a Super Computer to see if you can defeat it! Magnus Carlsen's play is represented by Magnus Age 29 on the play Magnus App.
Chess.com’s Computer 25 vs Magnus Carlsen Age 29
➡️ Play against the level 25 chess.com engine for yourself here:
www.chess.com/play/computer
🎵 Music: Jesse Gallagher - Thin Places
~ Disclaimer ~
Some of the links in my video description are affiliate links, which means I will make a small commission if you click them and make a qualifying purchase, at no extra cost to you :)
♟️ Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed this video and want to see more like it, then please subscribe!
✉️ Business Inquiries:
chessusee@gmail.com
#chess #magnuscarlsen #chesscomputer 
Развлечения
This is the equivalent of seeing usain bolt vs a car
or a cheetah yk
@@pmoney1814 well a cheetah gets tired out way before a human so a car is the perfect analogy
@@dayvwayv simps running for Bella Delphine
But the car wasn't created to run.
The chess bot is created to play chess, so that humans can learn from it. It's the literal foundation of creating an AI. Humans can't learn how to run from a car, but we can learn how to play from this bot.
@@pmoney1814 lmaoo
It's got to be demoralizing knowing no matter how long you think about it, the computer will instantly reply with the perfect move
I'm sure it is partially true, but when you go into the game knowing that you probably are going to lose, it releases you from any feeling that you need to perform well. Then there is no stress about the result of the game!
@@ChessUSee bro, i am sure you also have played some games against max stock like i have,,,,didnt u feel like we didnt thought too much on our moves like we do against humans cuz we already know,,,no matter what we will play we are going to lose.
Or exciting knowing if you learn from it the right way you can play similar positions perfect
Neuralink
How is that demoralizing? Our evolution leads to cybernetics. It’s glorious knowing the potential of what we will become. Control your megalomania and try to not let your ego interfere with the better angels of your judgment.
Mistakes
Computer lvl 25 : 0
Magnus : 1
Me : 4 after 5 moves
XD yes, it's the same for me!
Only noob people are here 😂 they don't know play magnus
I make 5 mistake in 4 moves
@@duwekapak yes, the first mistake is playing against computer lv25 😂
@@yovian8671 🤣🤣🤣
imagine losing with 97.6% accuracy
Yeah, it must be rough. That's the power of these top chess players and engines!
I tried to beat it with a potato phone. My cpu got to its limits
I was able to beat it with 98 accuracy with another stockfish😂
@@emiktra7929 🤮🤮🤮
Imagine 99.99
Me: e4
The bot: Mate in 20
Lmao
Haha, nice one FrenchFries!
XD
I can relate
Me: e4
Hikaru: I think this win
Their worst blunders are even better than my best moves
Haha, me too! These guys are unbelievable! I see 12 open squares to launch a good attack and the computers tell me that all are a blunder! lol, Thanks for watching the video Mr. Hawk!
There*
@@raiideen3890 you need to improve ur grammar dude
@@Black-fn8em i was just joking lmao
@@raiideen3890 yea ok
Bot in FPS Game : Noob
Bot in Chess : *G O D*
Except Guardian bots in CS:GO
Don't you dare make a sound, otherwise you'll get prefired.
@@mikejameson7678 and Expert in CS1.6
i faced like 10 veteran bots at once as a kid playing COD in a custom team deathmatch and i remember thinking "wow this is the computers best?"
@@mikejameson7678 we miss bots matchmaking🥺
@@TheBloodyAlboz-fw3uh I am very well aware.
Good news is, I never get kicked for no reason anymore.
when u play against bot 25:
New objective: Survive
Haha, nice comment!
Just get these perks:
- Juggernog: every piece resist 2 more hits
- PHD Flopper: don't let any piece get beaten if it falls down
- Double tap: no more lack of time, move every piece faster
- Widow's wine: any enemy piece will be suddenly stopped 1 square next to your piece that was going to get killed.
me using stockfish 14.1 : haha noob
Is it actually possible to beat? x.x
@@Adri9570 W comment
These Super GM vs top engine games are like a strongman playing tug of war against a tractor. 97.6% accuracy and still losing is rough.
Yeah, it really takes a ton of mental stamina to keep up with the high-level play! It sure must be rough to lose with high 90% accuracy oof
I’m new to chess world, what does the 97.6% accuracy mean
@@sqwippysquishy5287 It's basically a computer analysis of how well the player has performed. 97,6% is extremely high and means that almost every move Magnus played was the best possible option
@@jbfn14 thank you I get it now
@@jbfn14 jesus
My best against this engine is 33 moves. I know I'll never beat it, but sometimes it's fun to see how long you can last
Yeah, I don't know how long I have lasted against the bot, I guess I should try it! Perhaps in a video :) Thanks for watching!
Mine is 32
it can be simple to gain a slight edge on any computer but what happens is a slight miscalculation and it drowns you
@@JeremyRobertWalker app name
There are some exploits that if you move specific pieces it freaks out and doesn't know what to do.
You can beat it that way
Me plays pawn e4
Bot: Ah I see, so you have chosen checkmate?
Everyone making this joke and I don't know what it refer to, could you explain ?? Thx !
@@krevmaga Not sure if your comment is a joke but here lemme explain!
So I play e4, and since the bot is so much better then me, it already knows how to checkmate me in everyway. So when I play pawn to e4 (The kings pawn) The bot responds with the best move to checkmate me. :)
@@krevmaga e4 (kings pawn moves forwards 2 squares) is a very common opening move. The joke is just that the computer is so good that he planned ahead all the game and already know how it'll checkmate you right after your 1st move
@@EddieTristes Oh ok thanks, i'm not good at english so i had misunderstood the joke ahah, i tought it was the computer being afraid of a checkmate by e4
@@NovaTheDark Yeah i've got it now, thx for your answer !
Sometimes I use an engine against the high rated chess bots to make myself feel better
I just defeat hikaru before with engine 😂
@@mfaridzzibran9806 u gonna get bann dude
@bruh moment yes i am
@@mfaridzzibran9806 cheating like dewa AC?
@bruh moment 🗿
Me: *just doing a random move
Bot: typical mistake, there was an easy pawn winning strategy in 24 moves
The machine moves instantaneously; almost as if it’s taunting it’s opponent.
its probably trained with hikaru's games so it just pre-moved the entire thing ruclips.net/video/zOwY-5IlBig/видео.html
its, not it's (2nd)
@@michaelanderson7715 he has it right it’s = it is
@@sekokhan5307 WRONG. Read my reply again; "its, not it's (2nd)"...
- NOW, look at the 2nd usage of it's below...
"The machine moves instantaneously; almost as if it’s taunting it’s opponent."
- contractions removed, it reads...
"The machine moves instantaneously; almost as if it is taunting it is opponent."
- the 2nd it is is WRONG, it should be its. And YOU are WRONG too.
@@michaelanderson7715 oh thats what u meant by 2nd, ya the other its= its not it’s
The ai has no chill, my god.
The AI was built to do one thing.
And it does it's job very well!
@@ChessUSee its*
@@apollo268 seeing as the ai makes descisions on its own it would be "it's" in this sense
@@apollo268 this is the internet retard
@@GovnaBuckingham retard is not the right word. nor is it even a good choice of words.
That computer playing with the black pieces was pretty damn good.
That was magnusson numbnuts
@@OriqinLCinema it was sarcasm numbnuts.
@@bridgerarnold6412 and here I was thinking you'd understand your own humour
@@OriqinLCinema there is no irony or sarcasm in explaining that magnus was not the computer. You simply didn’t understand the sarcasm and are trying to backpedal
@@bridgerarnold6412 haha alright whatever man
The Maximus 25 AI has destroyed me countless times. I’ve never gotten close to this sort of end game.
A comment by Masterson everybody!
How to play against this engine?
@@henk7747 How to use it?
do you mean that you are not as good as magnus carlsen? :p how dare you
@Memes shorts 🤣🤣
Now imagine if the computer actually stop to think before making its move.
no need, the computer is extremely smart and already decides the best moves
Shit
It does quite a few times...I have literally seen computer stopping for may be 1-1.5 seconds for a noob player like me...Guess my wild moves makes the computer go crazy😂😂
@@robinraj4812 hahaahah
@@robinraj4812 Maybe... just maybe you've found the solution to defeating computers 😂 absurdity.
Subscribe to be entered to win my *World Chess Championship Chess Set* (Valued at *$550* ). Fill out this form to be automatically entered to win: bit.ly/chessusee-win
I am randomly drawing a winner on December 23rd, so be sure to enter NOW so you don't miss out! Good luck everyone!
Liked this video? Check out this playlist with all of my chess computer vs chess computer videos! ruclips.net/p/PLQhEDr8hoYPdoBiA-ocFKK7Q8M5_Q5Oq2
I just have accidentially played against this level 25 3200 chess computer (actually i wantedto play against level 9 1400) and i played surprisingly well. It took the computer 25 turns to gain a serious advantage against me and i had to give up after 34 turns. Now i am confused and wonder if i could have >2000 because normally i struggle with the 1400 computer. Am i really that good or was i just lucky? I usually dont play much chess dont much chess and have no idea about the meaning of expressions like "sicilian defense, queens gambit (yes i watched the series) or the golden opening rules"
Maybe im a progidy😂(propably not😅)
It would be one thing if you beat the engine, but since it eventually gained the advantage and won, leads me to believe that you probably aren't a prodigy. However the opposite could also be true and I don't mean to discourage you from continuing chess. Even the top chess players in the world can't beat (at least easily) the level 25 chess.com computer either. It's probably not a good measuring stick for prodigy-ness.
I'd suggest that you just play 10 minute games on chess.com until you have at least 100 games played or until your rating stabilizes, whichever comes last. I wish you great luck in your chess improvement Robin!
5:12 why Marcus Carlsen didn’t take a2 with his bishop ?
Tower white take bishop, tower black take tower white and he could have the average no ?
@@LeKatanaV loses to Rd7+
Me: First move
Computer: So you have chosen Death
100% how it feels sometimes XD!
Damn the background music is literally the last boss theme
I had to choose some great music for this great matchup!
Imagine if the soundtrack was the Spec Ops Infiltration theme from Call of Duty MW2 (it's the music that is played on the missions with Juggernauts).
Scary as hell, even if you never played that video game.
@@Adri9570 the best music is the one in the intro of takedown or before the intro of 'enemy of my enemy'
97.6% accuracy is insane and I doubt anyone could have played anywhere near as good a game as he played
Yeah, that was a very good game by the World Champion, but not quite as good as the Max chess engine!
@@ChessUSee i still give it to the human. Not the engine.
and yet he loses
Why can’t white win? Dumb question, I know… but it looks like white can win this game…
@@justsomethingtothinkabout8515Chess engine Maximus is playing white and yes he won.
The best thing I was able to beat was grandmaster beth harmon only took about a couple days but I won
Nice job White! What other bots are you working to defeat next?
@@ChessUSee probably trying the other grandmaster
@@tentaclefather2069 Well good luck! I don't think I could beat a GM rated chess bot! I'm not nearly good enough :)
@@ChessUSee hey atleast you can practice that's what helps the most
Yes, my account is RogueAI3160
The fact that he was 1.6% behind the computers accuracy is insane. It's almost like his brain works just like a computer itself, but its just that the computer has a slightly better CPU.
Its not magnus its a computer designed to play like magnus look up play magnus
But, you can't unplug MC, lol
You know the AI is so damn confident when it is even shouting mid game to Magnus like "THAT'S A BEST MOVE" or "THAT'S AN INACCURACY" If that's me I would have punched that trash talker's face eons ago.
That’s a different ai I believe.
It’s just a calculator, nowhere close to ai
@@LOLLYPOPPE we should have realized that when deep blue beat Kasparov the human race was finished
*When I think the same move that magnus was going to play.*
Me: I'm feelin like a chess god, chess god 😎😎.
It sure does feel great to predict the move that is played in game! I have a lot of fun trying to guess the moves while filming the games and then being shocked at the brilliant moves the computers and players come up with!
You are the next Magnem
@@ChessUSee Ya it feels really good !!!.
@@adityamahanta6438 😂😂 LOL 😂😂.
The same lol😂
let's be honest now, you play against your smartphone and you lose every single time no matter what you do.
That depends on which bot I choose to play :)
The Computer Level 1 is pretty easy haha
@@ChessUSee
I mean, the smartphone's best capability in the hand of updated best software can be.
The fact that the cpu wasn't even at 100% accuracy, imagine when someone develops an even better cup that can go 100% accuracy.. Pretty terrifying
But how can the machine know that it's not 100% if the machine itself played? Why didn't it move at 100% accuracy then?
@@sergeydid9413 sus
This is far from 100% accuracy. Even handicapped lcz0 on any gpu with limitation to calculate only 10000 lines will defeat it easly. This computer is trash compared to any dedicated engine
@@sergeydid9413 Is because have a adversary
I bet if Magnus keeps playing that computer, everyone else he plays will be easy!
It's not so much the style of play or the moves of the chess computers that makes it so hard for humans to compete, but rather it is the insane calculation abilities of the computers. They can out-calculate human and win games with ease. I'm sure Magnus uses computers during his tournament preparation though!
That’s not how it works. Every good chess player will tell you that it will rather make you worse at chess than better.
@@fulcocrimson Because ai isnt human
@@hanepkalishka9486 does it matter tho? Human also calculate before proceeding to next move same goes with ai. Its all about calculation imo.
I would gather perhaps it's more difficult to learn from mistakes playing an a.i. as it will always be better and unforgiving. The fatigue would be harsher and you're not able to take any moment and grow from it because you can't see improvements against such an opponent. Playing someone on your level is a better experience to learn from, because it can be more forgiving. Even if you were to play someone far above you, as long as they intend to teach, you can learn a lot more from the loss.
I cannot even play an opening without losing pieces against the max comp, magnus is a machine lol
The last jobs ai and machine learning will take over will probably be politicians and lawyers sadly.
It's a a point where it can probably already take most jobs
This is the reason why Bobby Fischer left chess. It became all analytical and soulless when the machine took over. Kills the fabric of human touch.
The maximum level is very hard to defeat even with assist tools.
One time I played bot 25 with all the tools and used hints for every single move which made all of my moves perfect. I still lost
@@twstdreality Yeah, until I realize stockfish with some inaccuracy moves could defeat the maximum level engine.
The program used to decide your accuracy isn’t the best. It doesn’t know what a perfect move really is. No engines can play perfectly yet, they are getting closer however.
@@HunterYangBird I don't think we'll ever get a perfect move. There's just no such thing. Chess is a game of innumerable pathways and outcomes, so a "weak" move now might result in a galaxy brain outcome in 10 plays. You just can't calculate that.
With assist tools I always draw with the computer
I honestly think chess computers are that good now that it's pretty pointless playing them. Whatever you do they will instantly calculate and play the perfect move. The last time we had a chance against them was when Kasparov played Deep Blue - after that chess engines just took over.
Yeah, the chess computers sure are good! Nowadays its just fun to play the different bot personalities on chess.com! (At least there I stand a chance!)
I think Kramnik might have beaten Deep Blue in a single game as late as 2000? I don't remember though
Nah, as even Magnus said, computers weren't really better than top human players at the time for Deep Blue. It took at least another decade before engines reached a league of their own. IBM made Deep Blue specifically to beat Kasparov and fed it lots of his games, but they didn't keep up their end of the deal and let him have time to study its games. Even so he could have beaten it, but the psychological aspects of it got to him, and they refused a rematch.
Gary fucked it for all of us. The worm!
Chess is simply solved by comps.. Thats reality.. I think GO has more combination then chess, but little bit later, also overcome human... No pity, I do not play chess for reason to beat algorithm.. And I am sure comp do not enjoy it 😁 At that stage people stay better (I hope) otherwise we could recognize new, unhuman race...
meanwhile i’m over here getting destroyed by nelson
It's a long road to become a chess master....
And even then somebody's cell phone can beat you any day!
Trade the queens
@@IHurricane its not worked, i tried it many times but still losing the game
Tbh I never played Nelson just the other 1300 and 1400s lol
Ok I just played Nelson and he's damn annoying lol
Magnus looks on fire. Hope he gets over 2900
It would be incredible for him to reach 2900, since he gets very few points for a win and loses a bunch of points with a single loss. Progress in rating is difficult when nobody is rated anywhere near you!
Hes at 3123 lmao
@@jamieoliver9620 They meant FIDE Rating and not online blitz rating.
@@ChessUSee what if draw?
@@zebryn3361 draw favours lower rated opponent, although it's just less elo gain/loss
I love how there is a moment of silence at every chess move
Magnus only made like 3 inaccuracies, GM’s are practically bots
More like 1
Me: d4, knight f3
Ai: gg go next
Also me: d4, king d2
Ai: OKEY now we are talking
The bot after this game: the flesh is weak!
Really great video. Really scary thing to see that even possibly the best chess player to have ever lived can't beat an engine :o
Also, really nice to see you answering all the comments, so thoughtfully, hope your channel never stops growing =)
Thanks a lot JidiPlayGames! Yeah, engines can simply out calculate humans which makes chess against them very difficult! I like to interact with viewers as much as possible, and I'm glad to meet you.
Thanks for the warm wishes!
You should check out stock fish vs alpha zero AI.. where humans are no match for engines, alpha makes mince meat out of the best chess engines.
Magnus is not the best player ever btw
@@MuLT1G4M3 I thought he was
@@MuLT1G4M3 Who is the best player ever?
1:07 The moment when Magnus almost lost
2:33 The moment when Magnus had been calculated to lose
This is not Magnus Carlsen , is Magnus Carlsen aged 25 which is also a bot from Play Magnus app
Yes, I made sure to add that in the description of this video so that it wouldn't be confusing. Thanks for watching!
At 3:49 why didn't the computer take the bishop on D4 with its rook? I'm not the best player but trying to learn so would be helpful to know
Imagine two Maximum Computer 25 play with each other, it might be a draw and the accuracy would be high :o
👍
You can actually do that .. use the hint button
No Bongcloud opening, no glory.
Haha, that would be an interesting twist!
It's fascinating how he always plays the best move, meanwhile I'm making 6 blunders per game 😂
i feel like somewhere reaching and right after the 2 minute mark, it is for certain the computer calculations are based on not being able to come with anything actually optimal.
the game specifically gets weirder after 2:43, either player can just start pushing any pawn they want, and then all of the sudden the computer just calculates weird piece movements.
at 3:03 it seems like literally anything can be a good play from magnus's pov.
and then after finally choosing the pawn positions they did, the computer just somehow calculates the movement at 3:49 of capturing bpawn with wpawn at e5 from f4, after magnus moves brook to a8 blocking wpawn at a7.
what if magnus just decides before 3:03 after 3:00 to take the wpawn at c5 with bbishop from d4, sure he leaves the e5 bpawn to be taken by the wrook at e6, but what if thats not what happens, and even if it does, theres still a ton of options.
he would be winning with pawns, has better positioning, and still has all pieces.
where as instead, he ends up sacrificing a rook for bishop for a game of bishop rook vs 2 rooks. and most of all each player worrying about pawns still, not just forcing the computer to worry about the black pawn while magnus can take out, block, or not care about the white pawn in various ways.
even in the very end, instead of resigning, he still has ways to force a bishop vs rook game.
Magnus : resign at 53 moves
me : win at 34 moves with my Stockfish 😎
I'm sure Magnus played a stronger version of Stockfish than the one you played, but none the less, congratulations!
@@ChessUSee how can I play with Grandmaster bots ?
@@unknownplayer7190 Right here: www.chess.com/play/computer
Just scroll down to the bottom of this list of chess bots to play the Grandmaster bots. Have fun!
@@ChessUSee thank you so much 💪😃
But I can't choose grandmasters
Props to magnus for making this video 6 minutes and 46 seconds long!
Imagine playing agaisnt a 3200 rated engine and making 1 mistake and 0 blunder.
The real gansta
"Your opponent played well" Bit of an understatement.
It's like playing chess in heaven with that music and that sound of the pieces when they are moved...
Damn it I wanna see the checkmate for once
The Play Magnus App is built to resign in clearly lost positions, but if I have a new video of the computer playing against other chess.com bots, those chess.com bots are not programed to resign. They will play to checkmate.
3:24 it was a dead draw until this move.damn magnus really is a god.
Facts I saw him move the pawn and was like NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!! I knew it was going down hill from there. Magnus still a beast though.
How does the computer have an inaccuracy? By what means?
that's excellent background music
Magnus is a strong player but computer did moves near momently and Magnus had able to think for many hours and my Stockfish 8 played versus thes maximum:
24,5-0,5
How did you get the computers to play against each other?
Hey Lee,
I recorded the chess.com computer on my computer using screen recording and on my phone I had the Magnus Carlsen App set at age 29. Then I simply relayed the moves back and forth to create this simulation of a game between the level 25 computer and Magnus.
I dont understand the computer from min 4:12 what is missing
“Your Opponent played well” The computer patting itself😃😃
6:23 Biased AI
I predicted his 2 moves.. now feeling great 😂😂
Computers are insane, now im curious how this engine is developed
With the help of Machine Learning & Deep Learning
@@mughalindustries2891 dunno. I dont think so. I think that you can write code to iterate through all oppoenent's possible moves (there are not as many as you'd think, especially in mid-late game) then iterate through all your possible moves after and so on and so forth, creating a branching map of possible moves, discarding the branches that are losing and selecting a branch that wins.
There would be trillions of combinations, but honestly, computers are good at this. Its amazing how much data they can remember, especially since this data is quite simple compared to computing graphics engines (which I have done for colision detection or mesh deformation, where there are millions of vertices to move and keep track of)
2:51 I would have moved d8 rook to d7, moving f8 rook to d8 position. Stopping the problem of the bot taking out your Bishop when you move your d8 rook from collum D. Which would then allow f8 rook moved to d8 to escort your b5 pawn while being able to possibly take out their pawn a5, while all having their c5 pawn on lockdown by your d4 Bishop.
the computer responds different it will obviously foil ur plans
Kkkkkkkkk bro.
Was gonna comment that Magnus still played well but I mean he's Magnus so I guess that's a given.
I told my friend to try this and he is a beginner. He plays against beginner bots.
He got checkmated in 6 moves 😭
😭😭😭
Truly incredible lots of Best moves from Magnus Carlsen this shows that humans can achieve great things
How you found the material for this video? Was you watching a stream with Magnus Carlson and the computer?
Hello Шахматы для любителей, I filmed this game myself using a simulated match between Chess.com's maximum computer and the Magnus Age 29 bot on the Play Magnus App. Thanks for watching!
@@ChessUSee so this is not magnus actually playing?
Can someone explain how or why that was a loss for Magnus? Couldn’t they have continued a little further?
he probably knew he cant do much in the position he is and just resigned to make it faster
The computer brings down the white rook pining the bishop,then just pushes pon and soon it will promote
Wasn’t Magnus white?
One inaccuracy
One mistake
And the computer buries him alive
I think Magnus' PC hates him
Gary Kasparov with Deep blue: hmm somewhere I've already seen it
I am an AI professor. I developed my first chess engine back in 2004 and now my student developed one for his MSc project. Chess engines today are only limited by the amount of quality games they get to see and the limited computational power provided to them. if the most powerful computers are given a high-level game (let's talk highest-rated computer vs another computer) and standard time, no human can even come close. And we have get to incorporate high-end machine learning into playing chess...we still use game trees. Now imagine having a quantum computing algorithm. It would be insane.
"your opponent played well". now thats taunting
I probably would've took queen and lost in two 😔
once enough pieces are gone and the computer still has a tenable position, it becomes nightmarishly difficult as the search tree collapses.
I feel ya. I feel like that's why even playing intermediate bots, if they make it into an endgame with you, and they still have a chance to win, suddenly they feel way stronger in the endgame. A bot that is supposed to play like a mid tier intermediate player suddenly starts to feel like an advanced player who is champion of their local chess club.
Yesterday, I tried playing against the Max AI using only moves the game recommended. I still lost.
This man plays well. He might become world champion one day
lol
He's a decent player, but he's got a ways to go before even dreaming of gaining the World Champion title from Ding or Ian!
He is now a world champion bro
The background music alone is calm and beautiful, but in this situation, it sends shivers down my spine.
Word
Bro with that theme tune in the background, it felt like the fate of humanity depended on this Human Vs AI game
Haha, I thought so too! Thanks for watching!
@@ChessUSee 😂😂
I love how there is celestial music for a title match
0:55 would never happen…
Clearly he would Take The queen insted
Exactly.
Who do you think would win, if the match Carlsen vs Morphy could happen?
I think Magnus would win, and since I for some reason haven't made that match up, thanks for the inspiration to film and upload that game!
@@ChessUSee would be nice to see :D
Morphy is so outdated Carlsen would crush him right from the opening
@@thelolmaster1997 I agree Carlsen would probably win, but it would be much closer than you think. Morphy is outdated, but he is still incredibly strong. He was so far ahead of his competition that he would often give pawn odds or even knight odds to his opponents in tournaments just to make it more competitive. Today, grandmasters win games even against Stockfish with pawn odds, so it signals that Morphy could have a chance of beating Carlsen, given just how strong he was during his time. He even ended up quitting chess because there was no real competition for him.
@@MultiCoolman125 Agreed. The mighty Bobby Fischer himself has said "Nobody sees the whole board like Morphy does" meaning his intuition and understanding of chess.
It's crazy how smart the AI computers are and i play the AI computer on Chess Universe and it's ranked ELO 2400 and i can't beat it but I've came close but not close enough because the AI knows every counter move..
1:36 , I’m not too good at chess but could magnum have of just checked with his knight instead of playing it in front of the bishop? Wouldn’t he have gained material
What if I won against this computer. There must be some kind of reward for beating this monster
It's literally impossible
You would have to know the larger pattern of a number you dont have the lifespan to count too just to be on par. Youd have to dedicate your whole life to theory against computers using their own frameworks. If you study each move eventually youll find a path and know its path multiple moves ahead and towards stalemate. Never checkmate though, computers dont make mistakes. Theyd never let themselves be in that position. They know which paths end to what.
@@aliceslab every computer has a weakness. The answer is easy. We’d just need to get into the programmed code to shut it down then boom…checkmate.
@@BrownHammwr lol ya maybe by hacking it to make one critical blunder
You would be instantly banned for cheating or being a bot.
music relax name pleas?
I've never seen the bar stay in the middle for so long...
That's what you get when you put two extremely talented players against one another!
6:20 .How the computer decided that it made 1 inaccuracy ? doenst make sence ?
Even for a genius like magnus, this must be so mentally exhausting by the end of it.
Так же как не один штангист не сможет соревноваться с подъёмным краном. Так и человек не сможет соревноваться с компьютером.!😎👍
Me: e4
Computer: Thanks for playing
LOL
My best game against engine 25 was lasting 52 moves before being checkmated it was my king vs his king and 2 pawns and it promoted them both. I’m just glad I lasted so long
now imagine 2 AI playing with each other
Alternative Title:
Machine vs Machine
True, but not as great for SEO on RUclips! The current title attracts more viewers and that's why I use it.
Thanks for watching the video QueTe!
0:50 im new to chess why didnt he take the queen? There even was a free tower next
Magnus and one of the best chess computers are definitely above my level of chess skills, but from what I understand, after Magnus takes the Level 25 computer's queen and rook on the next move (the Level 25 computer also will take Magnus' queen and rook in this trade), the position is simply better for the Level 25 computer. Because Magnus doesn't want to give his opponent this advantage, he avoids the situation.
Stockfish: Bd8 is best for black
White King: C4
Also Stockfish: Resignation is best for black
WAIT WHERE DO YOU GET THESE CLIPS FROM??
This was a game that I played out and filmed. I am the original creator for this clip.
@@ChessUSee BUT THEN HOW DID YOU PLAY USING MAGNUS CARLSEN'S ACCOUNT??
@@classxi-a9428 probably cus he is Magnus Carlsen?
@@andrewdavies579 BRUH THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE
MAGNUS ALREADY HAS A YT CHANNEL
@@classxi-a9428 This is his channel.
He is the best player in the world
Magnus is the #1 in the world, yes. We will see if he eventually is surpassed! That would be neat.
@@ChessUSee not happening bud
@@Morgan-xw2nh eventually yeah
@@Nico-yy1fj been #1 since 2011 keep dreaming homeboy
@@Morgan-xw2nh woah chill bro
No entendí, no ví el jaque mate, ¿la computadora renunció? Alguien que me explique
Would someone please explain me Carlsen's move @1:05?
Was is a blunder?
What did I miss?
He was in a fork hold position. So if knight takes c1 then queen is trapped but white knight can go to d5 and double attack Knight f6 and Qc7. So the best thing to do here was to get rid of the white knight.