The first time i opened the new bible, which immediately rang weird; something made little sense and straight away grabbed my old one and sure enough! The new one replaced the word "discipline" for "punishment"! and that was that for me! When I asked an elder about how they could get away with doing what we were admonished to never do, add, change, omit, any word of the book, he blatantly said that this only applied to the book of Revelation! No regret or shame whatsoever!
Regarding their twenty-three index references for the enemy and only one for Jesus, the scripture Matthew 12:34 came to mind, where Jesus references the Pharisees as ‘vipers, whose mouths speak from the abundance of their hearts.’
Actually, it only mentions Jehovah about 12 times as well and yet he made a great deal about the fact that the name Jehovah is mentioned around 7000 times in this Bible.
This is such a good video! Thank you. 3rd gen JW and out since 2016 Opened eyes……. It never felt right, nothing made sense. Ever with me! Especially about Jesus.
You're right, it is NOT a Bible. Whoever did it will have to answer to the Lord God Almighty for chopping up his word. Subtracting and Adding to God's word is a sin, it is forbidden!
No, it's an ABOMINATION Based heavily on the dark spirit "channeled" writings of Johannes Greber, a demon channeler (see his page on Wikipedia) The 🐰 hole is deep & dark with WitchTower. See videos/ writings from Fritz Springmeier & Jordan Maxwell for more of the Freemasonic foundation & core of WitchTower/jw
Everything Jehovah’s Witness leadership does has to do with money. Since they were a multilevel marketing scheme, they market their publications to their own members. New Bible translation which every JW MUST HAVE = more donations. Back in the 90’s, suggested donation for a Bible was $25. Also, it conveniently gets rid of certain problematic verses 😂
@@amandabomination691 Your comeback was so predictable. To be expected. Don’t twist my meaning matey I compared the use of the word not persons John 1:1 your favorite trinity doctrine text says Jesus is “Theos” and 2 Cor 4:4 says the Devil is Theos” and as he is the ruler of the system of things he is a god but when compared to God the Father he is false. However, no text describes the Devil as so
@@amandabomination691 Sorry that comment was not for you at all. I had no intentions to comment either but now I am here, what you stated is just poppycock. All the best though
They know EXACTLY what they are doing. I made a video on my channel about this topic PROVING that the DO know and that they DID know. I bring out many of the points you are bringing out in my video. But I prove they did know beyond any doubt. They openly mock Jesus in the black NW Translation by referring to Our Lord Jesus as an IT. When they are talking about Jesus’ birth and the Magi s visit. When this is discovered they changed the wording to him in the 2013 edition.. but then remove Jesus altogether from the index at the back. My video is called ‘Are the Watchtower Society part of then Anti Christ.?’ You can find it by clicking on my thumbnail and going to videos. Thank you for your work and you are very generous in giving them the benefit of the doubt. I’m not so generous and I directly tell that they are of their father the devil and by producing this translation, they wish to do the work of their father. ❤
Hey Marcie, Thank you for mentioning and coming on my channel to comment! I’ll check out the video you’ve mentioned, I’d love to hear what you got out there! God bless you dear sister! 🙏💖🙏
Thanks so much Marcie, You’ve got some excellent videos there too, you articulate your points beautifully and calmly, and yet firmly. You’ve got so much experience in the Org. and well done for calling them out and put them on the spot for what they’re doing to people. It’s important to make our voices heard, the more of us are the more it drowns out the WT lies and hopefully bring people back to the only Way, Truth and Life. That is the most high Jesus the Saviour King! 🙏 Amen
I saw you on Teach YHWH and it was so good. I'm an elder in a church in England and I just love Jesus! I've very recently started a channel and I do street preaching, sermons in churches and Bible study. I have subscribed to Teach YHWH and she has subscribed to my new channel and she shares my videos. It would be great if we could have the same relationship (if you like my content of course). It would good to spread the message of the real Jesus to save souls and exalt the Name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, for His glory. God bless.
Hello dear Brother! Thank you for your comment and of course, I'll sub to your channel! Its so refreshing to see new and bold channels popping up praising our only Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ!🙏❤Street preaching is one of the most courageous form of giving the Lord a powerful witness and I really admire people who do that! Watched some of your videos and your love and zeal for Jesus is evident and bold and so full of love! And you're a good teacher as well!👍🙌 Thank you for reaching out and all the blessing and success to your channel through our Saviour! God bless you Brother!🙏
Yes I’ve made a video on my channel about this on my RUclips channel. What a disgrace! Also in the black Bible before the grey one , in Matthew where it discusses Jesus birth, it refers to Jesus as an IT not as him!! Outrageous!
I don't know where you are looking, but I have just checked the concordance in the NWT and it is there. Like many of these channels and replies, so much misleading information.
Yeah, they usually do, because it allows us to conclude that with the added “a” it makes Jesus a false God. Because if there is only One true God, and scripture says the Word (Logos-Jesus) was God…they’re in trouble..! But with the added “a” they can have their cake and eat it🥴
I want I will tell you exactly what it is ment to say John 1 v 1c to start with it say in the beginning was the word and the word was with God TON THEON and the word was Theos have you noticed 2 different words. Theos is translated in 234 bibles as a god the same Theos is used at acts 28 v 6 same word a god please check your self
And that is how to read John 1 v 1 in the beginning was the word and the word was with God TON THEON the father and the word was Theos the son a god not the word was God thank you very mutch please check your self 😊
Thank you. Someone mentioned that watchtower doesn’t use the name Holy Bible on the cover, but instead uses scriptures, because perhaps they can get sued by calling it the Holy Bible due to all the changes they made to the scriptures. Any thoughts on that?
They, by all the time, avoid 'christian' (reformed churchs) way of naming things: pastor, deacon, church, God (alone), Holy spirit, cross and so. I was one JW and understood that it was the code language we had in order to be "different" separated, from the rest.
Amen........also...... Revelation 22:18-19 King James Version 18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I found it ironic that the content creator quoted Jason BeDuhn where he acknowledged that the NWT translators remain anonymous just like the translators of other versions. However what the presenter failed to mention was that BeDuhn's book, Truth In Translation, features a comparison of some of the most famous English language Bibles as they translate controversial and difficult passages. In almost every case, the Watchtower's NWT comes opuit on top. Seriuosly" I didn't believe it either and so had to read the book. I wonder why that was not mentioned. He also fails to mention that many study Bibles have references that the long ending of Mark and the Passage in John 8 are later interpolations and not found in the oldest manuscriupts. He also fails to mention that 1 John 5 :7 was a late interpolation and has since been removed from most modern Bibles.
Processor Barkley was WRONG. Not only is "and the Word was a god" grammatically possible it IS the correct English translation when one adheres to the grammar of both the Greek and English.
@@BEN280184 But if you are a true monotheist like Jesus; in the context of John chapter 1: 1 it can only mean one thing. In Psalm 82: 6,7 the statement is made of ungodly pseudo-gods which Jesus, in quoting (John 10:34-36) would not have implied against Himself and especially in the context of His statement in v.30 “I and The Father are One.” Either Jesus as One with the Father is “The One True God” and One with The Godhead as He is also One with The Holy Spirit (John 14: 17,18). If not, He is a master deceiver and blasphemer! Those who would argue that He never claimed to be God don’t understand monotheistic Theology and would have been with the crowd that picked up stones charging Him with insanity or demon possession.
@@davidmason9925 Jesus and the apostles worshiped ONE GOD. They knew that there were other god's that existed. The Hebrew word translated as god/God simply means a "mighty one" or a "strong one" or a "powerful one".. If you want proof then please tell me what Bible version you prefer I will give you a list of texts that show those meanings of the Hebrew words that are usually translated as god. People have a very wrong idea as just what the word god means. Our English word for god comes from an old Proto-Germanic word that means "invoked one" There are no texts in the original languages of the Bible (Hebrew and Greek) that ever suggests that Jesus was The God (The Almighty). Jesus certainly never claimed such an idea. If you think that Jesus was actually one with the father then the apostles were also one with Jesus and the father read John 17:11 and 22.
@@davidmason9925 Jesus was not a monotheist. The Jews were not monotheist. If we must put a label on them then Jesus and the Jews were Monolatry. -- that is they recognised that there are many gods, but, that they worshipped only one The Bible speaks of many gods. The ancient word translated into English simply means a “powerful one” or a “mighty one” or a “strong one”. The ancient words were used for the Almighty creator of the universe, men, angels and even some natural phenomenon. Yes Jesus and the Father are on in unity of purpose and through just as the Jesus and the disciples were one in unity of purpose and thoughts (John 17:11) “I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to You. Holy Father, protect them by Your name that You have given Me, *so that they may be one as We are one.”* John 17:21-23 “21 May they all be one, as You, Father, are in Me and I am in You. *May they also be one in Us,* so the world may believe You sent Me. 22 I have given them the glory You have given Me. *May they be one as We are one.* 23 I am in them and You are in Me. May they be made completely one, so the world may know You have sent Me and have loved them as You have loved Me.
This Grey Shank, made by JWs have taken the brackets out, the brackets show words in English superimposed for context (ancient Greece had only 20 letters vs of 26 in english). JWs took them out of New Testament Bible. By doing this their own members get confused and don't know when scripture is inspired of God in text or when men have infused their words to promote unscriptural policies......look and review earlier bibles written by them that have the brackets vs this Grey bible vs a greek interlinear side by side in passages like Colossians 1: 16-20. You can actually see where these changes were made and how the context was changed.
Thank you for this video excellent very informative, just a side comment I believe the Greek inter linear was written by wescott and Hort Catholic priests possibly defectors from Roman Catholic and I don't believe they were really believers in the Christ as Savior similar to Jewish belief, my theory which would further study could possibly be proven is that the Jehovah witnesses took the translation of wescott and short and made their Bible translation from that and then just change the words that they wanted to promote their doctrine, not a an actual translation but a copy with modifications.
Hey, thanks for commenting! Yes, you’re spot on with that observation! Wescott and Hort were the writers of their Greek interlinear translation, which was mildly put; very biased and yes, despite being either priest and bishops in the past, they weren’t believers in Christ and his finished redemptive work that saved us by His grace through faith. They refused to believe even the documented miracles in the NT, and said salvation depends on our own merit and works, by paying for our own sins. Also saying heaven is a state, not a place; the Textus Receptus (of which the KJV were written by 14 of greatest scholars at the time who actually spoke those ancient languages) is a villainous, vile, perverted texts… Also “Jesus bearing and dying for our sins is a universal heresy” and Hort said: “ I don't see how God’s justice can be satisfied without everyone suffering in his own person and paying full penalty for their own sins”….Wow! They also had connections to the occult, spiritism and necromancy, themselves establishing and joining such groups who involved in these things. These two scholars had absolutely no respect of the authority of God’s Word, valuing the Pope’s and the clergy’s views and teachings above God’s written Word. JWs have also been using up until 1953(?) a New Testament version that’s been written by a German priest called Johannes Greber, who made his translation by the help of the spirit world. According to him he has literally been dictated by spirit entities this work, also his own wife being a spirit medium… So the combined efforts of these three guys have succeeded with a “Bible translation” that is literally came from the spirit world and been influenced by the occult and total aetheism and blasphemies of Westcott and Hort. This is the short version…. There is sooooo much more, which if I’d say… well, loads of people won’t be happy. Yes, biased, made up, blasphemous and sadly a big fat lie…. So you were absolutely correct on your observation…
The name "Jesus" is unfortunately a deception. The Father's name is YAHUAH יהוה. The name of the Son contains the name of the Father: he is called YAHUSHA יהושע which means "Yahuah is salvation" in Hebrew. YAHU is short for Yahuah and SHA שע means salvation.
Be careful about being radical about using the Hebrew and Greek. It’s not necessary, use your common language otherwise you’ll confuse people that you engage with the Gospel! Blessings on you! 📖
There is no letter J in the hebrew language, Yahuah Elohiym, and his true sons name is Yahusha , over 500 years ago, the letter J was put in there Alphabet, remember Yahusha was a hebrew all lies to deceive man from the truth plz look into this our lives depend on the truth , seek and Yahuah will reveal the truth Amien ❤❤🙏🙏
A Jewish scribal group the Masoretes of the 6th century claimed to have removed the tetragrammaton in places where it appeared in the Christian Greek scriptures (aka the New Testament) manuscripts of the bible. They had replaced it with adhonay (Lord) which practice modern day translators had carried on. Jesus condemned the Jewish religious leaders of his day for side-stepping and making God's word invalid by their importance on Jewish traditions like avoidance of using or pronouncing God's name whenever they came upon it in reading the scriptures.
That was so interesting!! Really good research there..! Thanks for showing us this! 👍 Unfortunately this only seems technicality comparing with the NWT’s blasphemy and interpretation of Scripture… Really good and interesting work on this research, thanks so much!
Each denomination has its own canon, Catholic, Presbyterian, Orthodox, JW, Mormon, etal. Even the ones that use some version of the KJV will pick and choose which passages to acknowledge and which to ignore. This has been the case for centuries. Question all Bible scripture. None is sacred, it was all written by middle eastern Hebrew Jews attempting to gather followers. Editing began with the very first translation into Greek. The nature of the creator is misrepresented throughout.
Verses John 8:1-11 are missing in NWT (STUDY EDITION & 2013 REVISION) but you will find them in 1984 NWT, Greek interlinear, KJV and other bible versions. Now why is that? Who omiited those verses? Think.... Think... Think...
Its sad that they are so desperate for knowledge with so little brain capacity. The enemy's sales pitch about knowing what God knows has taken a hold on them. Just like Adam and Eve. Jesus is the only way. 1 Tim 3:16
It’s not so much Brain capacity as it is their denial of the Person of the Holy Spirit! That error in their teaching is “Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” !!!
Yes, like David Mason said; it’s not so much about their brain, they’re so so zealous…but not according to knowledge. They honestly and truthfully and genuinely seeking truth, but been duped into listening to their religious leaders (like most religions) rather than scripture, being told they can not understand scripture without their interpretation and they (the regular members) not supposed to interpret it for themselves… because “what do they understand without the WT/GB?” So they’re stuck… Not realising that the Truth is a person….Jesus himself. Not a religion, ideology or doctrine. Salvation is a person, Life itself is a person, reconciliation, redemption, grace, mercy, love….all the same person! Yeshuah/Jesus our amazing Saviour 🙏💪💖👍
@@roeltingzon758 Exactly! in John 14:16 Jesus identifies the Comforter who abides with us forever as the Spirit of Truth. Jesus is Truth. And then in verse 18 He says "I will not leave you comfortless, I will come to you"... He'll be with us with his Spirit of truth, living in all true believers
That's a good question...! Well, i guess they can no longer call it that, as it has been so chopped and butchered, with things taken out and added everywhere, its no longer recognisable as God's written Word; the Bible...
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Good question you say. Really! Good question. Is the word "Bible" sanctified and biblically commanded to be used once all the books are compiled into one? The term "Bible" comes from the Greek word "Biblia," which means "books" or "scrolls." The Bible is a collection of sacred texts or scriptures considered authoritative in Christianity and Judaism. Do you know what Paul considered as the " hiera grammata" is translated to in numerous *trinitarian bibles*? (2 Tim 3:15 - holy scriptures, sacred writings, sacred scriptures, holy scrolls, sacred letters) Yes so hopefully the insensibility of the original comment and the followed agreement is quite the moot remarks.
I appreciate your content. I urge caution on one point. To knock them for not being scholars is a mistake. Were not Jesus' followers scorned for the same reason? Not having been taught at the religious schools at the time? Acts 4:13: 𝙉𝙤𝙬 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙖𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙅𝙤𝙝𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙚𝙣, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙙. NKJ Too many so-called "experts" in the world today. Many of the points you make are spot on. That said, they condemn other Bibles for taking out the name of God but then they add it in & have quite the justification for doing it! Point of interest on the name. About four years ago there was a group of rabbis that claimed they had found the missing vowels to the tetragrammaton and the actual pronunciation, in their evidence is "Jehovah." Big subject!
Great comment, thanks! Yes, I’m not a scholar either, I just relay the finds my research granted me to find and present. However there are numerous incontestable evidence that shows, this translation (I’m sorry I can’t call it that….so I’ll use the word interpretation) it’s not just biased,- scripture altered to fit doctrine-, but deliberately being cut, chopped and butchered to mislead the reader. Entire half chapters missing (John, Mark) with the weak and unproven excuse that they weren’t in the original manuscripts, words added and altered in the apostolic letters, especially those relating to Christ’s divinity (again; to fit their doctrine) … In this video I didn’t even show a quarter of the scriptural discrepancies, but that’s not my aim anymore. Again; I’m not a scholar and the information to research is widely available to all to do. But friend, rather I’d like to point you to Salvation himself, to the God who is with us; Emmanuel, Yeshua, Jesus: the Saviour of humanity and our high priest, the light of the world, life and resurrection himself, the Way, the Truth and the Life. Come to and believe in Him. 🙏💖 Thanks for your comment friend, truly appreciate it.
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Yes, I want to come to him. We did a deep dive on Rom 6 and it was an eye opener. I felt two things. Appalled that I had not given Jesus the proper place in my heart that he deserves and second, a feeling of freedom. Freedom from the pharisaical ways of WT. To really feel the love he showed by offering up his life for us and that it is a free gift if I exercise faith. No work or keeping to a code of rules will earn that salvation. Your videos have been so helpful. May God bless you!
By doing research i have discovered that Jehovah is mentioned 666 times and the K.J.V Bible mentioned Jehovah 7 times Jesus is mentioned 777 times. Rev.Ch.13 v18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast; for it it is the number of a man ; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 its not true i just checked. She wasted MY TIME and revelation 22:18 can now be applied to her In the old testament alone the name is mentioned 407 Times in exodus 174 times in genesis 552 times in Deuteronomy The Jehovah witnesses themselves say the complete number is 7000 WHICH YOU SHOULD KNOW. May Jehovah Rebuke you (Jesus is mentioned less than 5000 times) You should have gone with the colour but i will let you work that one out seems you give misinformation
Nothing apart from the fact that they admittedly use a name for God, that’s been made up by a “Christian” priest. Whom they label as God’s enemy… Just a bit hypocritical I thought…
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Thanks Brother, I believe the KJV is the word of God, but the name of Jehovah doesn't make sense, so this enemy had put the name there. But why would God allow this? Thanks
So, where in any English Orthodox Bible is God's NAME found? Please, tell us, for all I see and read, specifically in the OT, are only the two Titles, "LORD" and "God". To my knowledge, Biblical Scholars are in agreement that God's NAME is WRITTEN in those OT Scriptures THOUSANDS of times. But, where is it WRITTEN in our English Bibles, pray tell? You FAIL completely by quickly avoiding the MAIN issue, which is God's NAME. You barely touch the subject. Most KJV Bible toting Christians, most likely have no idea that the Title "LORD" is an English COVER UP word for the actual NAME of God Almighty, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In other words, His NAME is not "LORD" rather His NAME is "YHVH". So, everywhere you see the Title "LORD" written in your KJV, please note that it is a SUBSTITUTE word for "YHVH". God's NAME as written in the OT Scriptures is "YHVH". Now, using our God given brains, we can actually see that the four letter NAME of God, "YHVH", if we use vowel sounds, will come out looking somewhat like this, "YaHaVaH". What does that look like? What pronunciation would seem more correct, "Jehovah", "Yahaveh", "Yahweh", "Yahushua", etc.? Scholars have yet to figure out the pronunciation of the Biblical God's NAME, but it sure ain't "LORD". The English speaking world is still being deceived by English Bible Translators by blatantly COVERING UP God Almighty's NAME by using a SUBSTITUTE word, i.e., "LORD", thousands of times. God said that "His NAME" should be and will be KNOWN, not HIDDEN. Why attack the "JEHOVAH'S witnesses", when it seems THEY at least do not go around calling YHVH God Almighty "LORD" nor are they trying to HIDE His NAME. YHWH is our "GOD"; YHWH is the ONE and ONLY TRUE God; YHVH is the Father of the Lord Jesus (or Joshua if you so desire) and the God and Father of all Believers in Christ His human Son. The written Scriptures are not "confusing". The NAME of God is "YHVH" and not "LORD", so why do ALL Orthodox English Translators insist, yeah, demand that His NAME be COVERED UP? Not on my watch!
Hello, thanks for commenting and your interest. First of all let me address your first objection: God’s “name” found in the KJV x4 places: Psalms 83:18, Exodus 6:3, Isaiah 12:2, Isaiah 26:4 The topic of my video is Watchtower’s efforts to falsify and pervert Scripture by changing, adding, taking away and changing passages. Not about the name of God. And every Bible believing Christian KNOWS that God’s name YHWH IS in the OT thousands of times and also know that “LORD” ISNT God’s personal name, but rather just a title. So if you yourself admit that even Bible scholars didn’t figure out the exact prononciation of God’s name, (because no one knows what it actually sounded like); then the WHOLE argument is futile, because it makes no difference then if you use a title, or just keep guessing what it could be exactly. God Himself states in His own words when speaking to Moses that his name is I AM…. (Exodus 3:14)Or “I shall prove to be/I Will Become What I Choose to Become.”(JW version) He addresses Himself by a quality, an attribute, a pronoun….not a literal name? Are you going to question Him over that? So by your own argument you sabotage your own point, because if you do not use and pronounce it EXACTLY as it should be, (because we don’t know it) than it is WRONG. And then so using a title is not less wrong than using an incorrect guess-work based name. No? What’s important is rather than what it actually sounds like, is what it represents and sands for. And that is: FATHER….that’s what Jesus taught to His disciples and others, when He said: “I have made your name known to them”. They were Jews, EVERY Jew knew the name of God. Jesus wanted people to know God: His Father, as OUR Father…. Not by a personal name that millennia’s later no one would be able to pronounce. And so just because the WT restores this “name” in the Bible, it doesn’t make their “Bible”version any less false, corrupted and taking away Jesus’s divinity; reducing Him to mere creature, an angel or just a good man to be taken as a man example for us. Now that is blasphemous and I won’t have that under MY watch!
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 You changed the subject of my comment. It was not the "pronunciation" of the NAME but the NAME itself. The NAME of God in Scripture should be written or transliterated as "YHVH", the tetragrammaton instead of HIDING it behind a Title. In other words a Title is NOT a NAME, therefore the thousands of times the NAME "YHVH" is mentioned in Scripture it should be written with His NAME and nothing else. And no, most Christians do not know that God's NAME is "YHVH". I venture to say that most believe His NAME is "I am", which is incorrect. YHVH told Moses that He "would be whomever He wished to be", in other words He was telling Moses THE MEANING of His NAME. What anyone's Name MEANS is a different matter. Christians go around saying God's Name is "I am", which is ridiculous, and will defend their stance "till the cows come home". But, they, and you, are WRONG. God's NAME in Scripture, as revealed thousands of times by holy men of God is "YHVH" and NO OTHER. I said the JWs are more correct in that they translate, into English, the NAME of God, as best they can, i.e., JHVH, that is, "Jehovah", which is a Name and not a Title. So why do y'all translate the NAME of God with the Title "LORD", in the OT? Why not just transliterate into "YHVH"? What are y'all afraid of? On a Contract, is it ok to replace someone's Name with a Title. God wrote, through His men, His own NAME in the Scriptures, and hundreds of years later some men decided NOT to write it down but instead to REPLACE IT and to HIDE God's TRUE Name from His word, and according to you and others that's perfectly fine!! Give me a break. Watch your double standard. What is the English Name of the Son of God? If you answer anything other than "Jesus" you are WRONG. You cannot say that his Name is "Lord", or "Christ", or "the Lamb", or "the Door", or "the Way", etc. Yet, according to y'all, it's perfectly ok to Replace the NAME of God, i.e., "YHVH", with whatever pops into y'all's little brains. He only has ONE NAME, why not use it, even as He COMMANDED, instead of using a Title or a Meaning of a Name? So, I will keep proclaiming the NAME of God, which is "YHVH", and which can be pronounced as "Yahweh",or "Jehovah", or "Yahushua", or in any similar pronunciation which glorifies the tetragrammaton NAME "YHVH". How about correcting your English Bibles by actually writing down the NAME of God wherever it is supposed to be WRITTEN down, instead of that ignominious title of "LORD". I think I would get very angry if people were to exchange my Name in my Will and Testament to "Sergeant". That won't happen, not on my watch!
Misleading video..the name of Jesus in the bible is little, he was called Rabbi, lord, Christ, messiah and others....Gods name was mentions thousands times more but modern translations removed it,,so video should be why did other bibles remove Gods name...Bag whom you wish but just focus on click bait isnt fair, tell the truth.....Orginal translations rarely used the name Jesus, in fact if i recall its around 10 times and talk about translations, you have no idea ie mentioning a spanish monk,,,,All words from any language have to start somewhere as you cannot translate a word to another 100% as its an fabrication of the meaning into another foreign word,,,in some cases can seem completely different to general public....plus in some countries they dont have a translated word for Jesus, God, house, Computer, scuba diving,,,just a few examples of how complex translation is.... Have you ever thought how you translate your name into Chinese? It dont exsist....Your name dont exsist so they make ome up for locals so they try to understand or make up a word which may sound the same but mean completely different
Deut, 4:1-2, The scriptures were written by the prophets which is intended for physical Israelites, Jehovah spoke to them in their dreams, visions, no one literally seen him, @Ex,33:20, Therefore,we cannot expects that their prophecies were perfect, @1st,Cor,13:9, Paul said, "when perfect comes,the partial shall be done away,, There is one very important fact for all Jw's critics, they must learned that the scriptures were intended for physical Israelites, but since they were rejected, all rules and laws were abolished by God, then, the Kingdomship of God was given to the prophecized New Spiritual Israelites, which is the Jw's organization, @Matt,12:46-50/ v, 21:43/ Jesus affirmed these, @ Lam, 2:6-7,/ Lukes,4:18-31/
They haven't put Substitutes in 2 Cor 5:20 for a antichrist reason ,if you read the American Standard Version (bible) its uses the word " behalf" so very similar Or is the American Standard version wrong too ??😊
I think the main problem is that they wipe out Christ and really substitute him with their Governing Body. They teach not to listen to Jesus but the GB how "speaks on the voice of Jesus".
Yes I have noticed this quite a bit in their Wachtower and Awakes ...but they definitely believe and teach about Jesus in their publications as well. The reason for the increase of the GB in their publications I think is the nearing of Armageddon ,(end of this system of things) and they want JW to trust and rely on them more than ever
Benjamin Kedar Hebrew scholar has published that the NWT is one of the very best translations. JASON BEDUHN in his book TRUTH IN TRANSLATION demonstrates that the NWT is his number One choice for best translation. Yes no new info about the translators . It is no secret who they were.
Good presentation Sir. Watchtower is certainly a part of the NWO. But Jesus is not God. Jehovah is God. The real confusion begins with the blasphemous deletion of the tetragram YHVH in the OT, and "Substitution" of the word Lord, causing folks to imagine the lord Jesus in the reading.
Thank you for your comment!👍 Just the little detail that Jesus identifies himself as the First and Last, Beginning and the End, Alpha and Omega… These titles has only ONE person in the Old Testament. Not to mention: King of King and Lord of Lords…. In whose name EVERY knee bend and tongue shall acknowledge the He is Lord. No?
You're right, YHWH (Jehovah) is God. However, God consists of more than one person. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit. At Deut 6:4 where YHWH declares that YHWH is one, the word used for one is "echad" which means a combined plurality. That same word is used when God says at Gen 2:24 that a man and woman will be joined and become "one" (echad) flesh. And there are several places in the OT where there is clearly more than one YHWH. In Zech 2:7-12, YHWH is sent by YHWH. This is Jesus Christ in His pre-incarnate existence as God with God (John 1:1) who is sent to dwell in the midst of His people. I suggest you read that very carefully and follow who is speaking to who. This is just the tip of the ice berg from which the Trinity doctrine originates. Not from pagan beliefs. Yes, it's from Genesis to Revelation and once you see it, you have to accept it.
Jesus, Who was clearly monotheistic, he recited the Shema but then said, “He that has seen Me has seen the Father” John14:9 and, “ I and the Father are One.” John 10:30 Also, in reference to the Holy Spirit (The Comforter) He said, I will not leave you comfortless; I will come to you! John 14:18 Absolute proof of the Tri-unity of the Godhead! Water H2O is a good illustration. One substance having 3 parts which cannot be altered as to its composition; yet can be a liquid, a solid or a gas simply by its state; yet is unaltered! Keep seeking; you’re looking in the right direction ☝🏻Blessings! 📖
You are the one who is misleading. Just because Jesus' name only appears once in a shortened word index, at the back, that doesn't mean it's not in all the correct places where it should be in the rest of the Christian Greek scriptures. Also, if you are an ambassador speaking on behalf of someone as Christians are speaking in behalf of Christ, who gave them that ministry of the reconciliation, then in that context, you can be described as a substitute for that one, 2 Corinthians 5:20.
Hello again, To show where their alliance, principles, honour and worship lies truly…their respect, acknowledgement and gratitude for the sacrifice of Jesus. check out the background of Wescott and Hort… their interlinear writers. Look through the comments, I gave a brief background on them
Scholars are in agreement that the story of the woman caught in adultery was not authentic. Also Mark's account ends in 16:8. The verses following are later interpolations!! You need to do better!!!
Your words: “Jesus is not G-d. He was not the true mashiach and he is definitely not coming back. The so-called Apostle Paul never met the man Jesus and he was never a disciple of Gamaliel“ Calling yourself a believer, friend? In who exactly ..?
Jesus is not G-d. He was not the true mashiach and he is definitely not coming back. The so-called Apostle Paul never met the man Jesus and he was never a disciple of Gamaliel.
@@davidmcbrine4527 He is actually Jewish and Reject the Only begotten son God Jesus Christ. You can tell by his language. His is still waiting for the Messiah or “true mashiach” as he calls their Messiah.
Blah, blah, blah... I guess you know all these things because you were there, huh? Actually you are WRONG on all counts. He definitely IS coming back and you will one day bow your knee to Yeshua Hamashiach and will confess that he is Yahweh/LORD. Sooner is better.
The first time i opened the new bible, which immediately rang weird; something made little sense and straight away grabbed my old one and sure enough! The new one replaced the word "discipline" for "punishment"! and that was that for me! When I asked an elder about how they could get away with doing what we were admonished to never do, add, change, omit, any word of the book, he blatantly said that this only applied to the book of Revelation! No regret or shame whatsoever!
Wow! No that’s a testimony! 👊💪🙏
@@praiseofhisgrace3178... and we haven't even scratched the surface yet. No doubt about that!
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Left a comment but it's apparently taken away far away, from physical eyes.
Ephesians 6 : 12?
Hmmmm!🤔
@@davidmason9925 in-DEED
Amen brother! You are a blessing 👍
Thank you so much! God bless you🙏
Regarding their twenty-three index references for the enemy and only one for Jesus, the scripture Matthew 12:34 came to mind, where Jesus references the Pharisees as ‘vipers, whose mouths speak from the abundance of their hearts.’
Exactly! And he wasn’t nervous about calling them out..! What Saviour we have! 🙏💪💖👊💥
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 AMEN 🙌🏾💜🙏🏽
Actually, it only mentions Jehovah about 12 times as well and yet he made a great deal about the fact that the name Jehovah is mentioned around 7000 times in this Bible.
Thank you for this great video. Love your channel.
Thank you 🙏
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 you’re welcome.
This is such a good video! Thank you. 3rd gen JW and out since 2016 Opened eyes……. It never felt right, nothing made sense. Ever with me! Especially about Jesus.
Thank you! So glad that you made it out! May the light, grace and peace of Christ fill your heart and spirit always! 🙏Blessings!
Thank you for sharing praise of Jesus.
He is our LORD, King and God…as well as our big brother, friend, groom, and…creator! Praised be Jesus forever! 🙏💖🙌🔥🙏💪💖
It's not really the Bible, is it? Thank you for all you do to reach the lost. 🙏❤️✝️
Thank you so much 🙏
You're right, it is NOT a Bible.
Whoever did it will have to answer to the Lord God Almighty for chopping up his word. Subtracting and Adding to God's word is a sin, it is forbidden!
No, it's an ABOMINATION
Based heavily on the dark spirit "channeled" writings of Johannes Greber, a demon channeler (see his page on Wikipedia)
The 🐰 hole is deep & dark with WitchTower. See videos/ writings from Fritz Springmeier & Jordan Maxwell for more of the Freemasonic foundation & core of WitchTower/jw
Everything Jehovah’s Witness leadership does has to do with money. Since they were a multilevel marketing scheme, they market their publications to their own members. New Bible translation which every JW MUST HAVE = more donations. Back in the 90’s, suggested donation for a Bible was $25. Also, it conveniently gets rid of certain problematic verses 😂
And their obsolete notes in the old edition. 2014 made their teaching on eschatology embarrassingly wrong! 📖
@@amandabomination691 Your comeback was so predictable. To be expected. Don’t twist my meaning matey I compared the use of the word not persons
John 1:1 your favorite trinity doctrine text says Jesus is “Theos” and 2 Cor 4:4 says the Devil is Theos” and as he is the ruler of the system of things he is a god but when compared to God the Father he is false. However, no text describes the Devil as so
@@jahtruthdefender 🎈 💐
@@amandabomination691 Sorry that comment was not for you at all. I had no intentions to comment either but now I am here, what you stated is just poppycock. All the best though
And yet they give away their Bible free to any menber of the public who wants one. How much do Bibles cost in shops?
They know EXACTLY what they are doing. I made a video on my channel about this topic PROVING that the DO know and that they DID know.
I bring out many of the points you are bringing out in my video.
But I prove they did know beyond any doubt.
They openly mock Jesus in the black NW Translation by referring to Our Lord Jesus as an IT. When they are talking about Jesus’ birth and the Magi s visit.
When this is discovered they changed the wording to him in the 2013 edition.. but then remove Jesus altogether from the index at the back.
My video is called ‘Are the Watchtower Society part of then Anti Christ.?’
You can find it by clicking on my thumbnail and going to videos.
Thank you for your work and you are very generous in giving them the benefit of the doubt.
I’m not so generous and I directly tell that they are of their father the devil and by producing this translation, they wish to do the work of their father.
❤
Hey Marcie,
Thank you for mentioning and coming on my channel to comment! I’ll check out the video you’ve mentioned, I’d love to hear what you got out there!
God bless you dear sister! 🙏💖🙏
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 I love your channel it’s up there with the best!😉
Thanks so much Marcie,
You’ve got some excellent videos there too, you articulate your points beautifully and calmly, and yet firmly. You’ve got so much experience in the Org. and well done for calling them out and put them on the spot for what they’re doing to people.
It’s important to make our voices heard, the more of us are the more it drowns out the WT lies and hopefully bring people back to the only Way, Truth and Life. That is the most high Jesus the Saviour King! 🙏 Amen
Wow that’s amazing about that word substitute meaning ANTI
Isn’t it just…?
I saw you on Teach YHWH and it was so good. I'm an elder in a church in England and I just love Jesus! I've very recently started a channel and I do street preaching, sermons in churches and Bible study. I have subscribed to Teach YHWH and she has subscribed to my new channel and she shares my videos. It would be great if we could have the same relationship (if you like my content of course). It would good to spread the message of the real Jesus to save souls and exalt the Name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, for His glory. God bless.
Hello dear Brother!
Thank you for your comment and of course, I'll sub to your channel! Its so refreshing to see new and bold channels popping up praising our only Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ!🙏❤Street preaching is one of the most courageous form of giving the Lord a powerful witness and I really admire people who do that!
Watched some of your videos and your love and zeal for Jesus is evident and bold and so full of love! And you're a good teacher as well!👍🙌
Thank you for reaching out and all the blessing and success to your channel through our Saviour!
God bless you Brother!🙏
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Thank you so much for your encouragement. I'm sure our RUclips paths will interact many times! For the glory of Jesus.
Amen! 🙏 So be it!💖
In their concordance in their Bible Jesus is missing! But Jehovah is there, along with Satan, Beelzebub etc!
Yes I’ve made a video on my channel about this on my RUclips channel.
What a disgrace! Also in the black Bible before the grey one , in Matthew where it discusses Jesus birth, it refers to Jesus as an IT not as him!! Outrageous!
The leaders are truly evil yet the indoctrinated worship their leaders. Very sad
@@marcieebaby What scripture would that be? TIA
Hello sis! Thanks for commenting! I didn’t know that…, but I’ll check out your video. What is it titled? Have a blessed day! 🙏
I don't know where you are looking, but I have just checked the concordance in the NWT and it is there. Like many of these channels and replies, so much misleading information.
Well done 👏
Thank you bro 👊🙏🤩
Ironic that the name jahovah came from Catholic works.
It was already an well known name even long before the time of that Catholic monk.
@@roeltingzon758 can you please site references?
i opened Mark 1:1 and there looking in my face was the words Jesus Christ. also Mark 1:14 I could go on .
Great research brother!
Thanks so much 🙏👍
I mentioned John 1 to my cousin, who is a jw. She just skipped right over that and went on to something else
Yeah, they usually do, because it allows us to conclude that with the added “a” it makes Jesus a false God. Because if there is only One true God, and scripture says the Word (Logos-Jesus) was God…they’re in trouble..! But with the added “a” they can have their cake and eat it🥴
I want I will tell you exactly what it is ment to say John 1 v 1c to start with it say in the beginning was the word and the word was with God TON THEON and the word was Theos have you noticed 2 different words. Theos is translated in 234 bibles as a god the same Theos is used at acts 28 v 6 same word a god please check your self
And that is how to read John 1 v 1 in the beginning was the word and the word was with God TON THEON the father and the word was Theos the son a god not the word was God thank you very mutch please check your self 😊
Hey, yes, I was quoting a Bible scholar…
@@michaelhaigh9182 So your saying that the word THEOS refers to the Son, and THEOS is refers to the Father??? This is new to me
Thank you. Someone mentioned that watchtower doesn’t use the name Holy Bible on the cover, but instead uses scriptures, because perhaps they can get sued by calling it the Holy Bible due to all the changes they made to the scriptures. Any thoughts on that?
They, by all the time, avoid 'christian' (reformed churchs) way of naming things: pastor, deacon, church, God (alone), Holy spirit, cross and so. I was one JW and understood that it was the code language we had in order to be "different" separated, from the rest.
I don’t know anything about that to be honest…. It’s certainly possible though.
Yes! Saw that yesterday. Another Wake-Up-Call !!
I kind of doubt that. Scripture simply means Written Word 📖
Revelation 22:15
Amen........also......
Revelation 22:18-19
King James Version
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
I found it ironic that the content creator quoted Jason BeDuhn where he acknowledged that the NWT translators remain anonymous just like the translators of other versions. However what the presenter failed to mention was that BeDuhn's book, Truth In Translation, features a comparison of some of the most famous English language Bibles as they translate controversial and difficult passages. In almost every case, the Watchtower's NWT comes opuit on top. Seriuosly" I didn't believe it either and so had to read the book. I wonder why that was not mentioned.
He also fails to mention that many study Bibles have references that the long ending of Mark and the Passage in John 8 are later interpolations and not found in the oldest manuscriupts. He also fails to mention that 1 John 5 :7 was a late interpolation and has since been removed from most modern Bibles.
Processor Barkley was WRONG. Not only is "and the Word was a god" grammatically possible it IS the correct English translation when one adheres to the grammar of both the Greek and English.
@@BEN280184 But if you are a true monotheist like Jesus; in the context of John chapter 1: 1 it can only mean one thing. In Psalm 82: 6,7 the statement is made of ungodly pseudo-gods which Jesus, in quoting (John 10:34-36) would not have implied against Himself and especially in the context of His statement in v.30 “I and The Father are One.” Either Jesus as One with the Father is “The One True God” and One with The Godhead as He is also One with The Holy Spirit (John 14: 17,18). If not, He is a master deceiver and blasphemer! Those who would argue that He never claimed to be God don’t understand monotheistic Theology and would have been with the crowd that picked up stones charging Him with insanity or demon possession.
@@davidmason9925 Jesus and the apostles worshiped ONE GOD. They knew that there were other god's that existed. The Hebrew word translated as god/God simply means a "mighty one" or a "strong one" or a "powerful one".. If you want proof then please tell me what Bible version you prefer I will give you a list of texts that show those meanings of the Hebrew words that are usually translated as god.
People have a very wrong idea as just what the word god means. Our English word for god comes from an old Proto-Germanic word that means "invoked one"
There are no texts in the original languages of the Bible (Hebrew and Greek) that ever suggests that Jesus was The God (The Almighty). Jesus certainly never claimed such an idea.
If you think that Jesus was actually one with the father then the apostles were also one with Jesus and the father read John 17:11 and 22.
@@davidmason9925 Jesus was not a monotheist. The Jews were not monotheist. If we must put a label on them then Jesus and the Jews were Monolatry. -- that is they recognised that there are many gods, but, that they worshipped only one The Bible speaks of many gods. The ancient word translated into English simply means a “powerful one” or a “mighty one” or a “strong one”. The ancient words were used for the Almighty creator of the universe, men, angels and even some natural phenomenon.
Yes Jesus and the Father are on in unity of purpose and through just as the Jesus and the disciples were one in unity of purpose and thoughts
(John 17:11) “I am no longer in the world, but they are in the world, and I am coming to You. Holy Father, protect them by Your name that You have given Me, *so that they may be one as We are one.”*
John 17:21-23 “21 May they all be one, as You, Father, are in Me and I am in You. *May they also be one in Us,* so the world may believe You sent Me. 22 I have given them the glory You have given Me. *May they be one as We are one.* 23 I am in them and You are in Me. May they be made completely one, so the world may know You have sent Me and have loved them as You have loved Me.
At the end ,we will see which religion will stand firm. The others will fall.. may the odds be ever in your favour❤
This Grey Shank, made by JWs have taken the brackets out, the brackets show words in English superimposed for context (ancient Greece had only 20 letters vs of 26 in english). JWs took them out of New Testament Bible. By doing this their own members get confused and don't know when scripture is inspired of God in text or when men have infused their words to promote unscriptural policies......look and review earlier bibles written by them that have the brackets vs this Grey bible vs a greek interlinear side by side in passages like Colossians 1: 16-20. You can actually see where these changes were made and how the context was changed.
Yes, spot on..!
Amen
Thank you for this video excellent very informative, just a side comment I believe the Greek inter linear was written by wescott and Hort Catholic priests possibly defectors from Roman Catholic and I don't believe they were really believers in the Christ as Savior similar to Jewish belief, my theory which would further study could possibly be proven is that the Jehovah witnesses took the translation of wescott and short and made their Bible translation from that and then just change the words that they wanted to promote their doctrine, not a an actual translation but a copy with modifications.
Hey, thanks for commenting!
Yes, you’re spot on with that observation! Wescott and Hort were the writers of their Greek interlinear translation, which was mildly put; very biased and yes, despite being either priest and bishops in the past, they weren’t believers in Christ and his finished redemptive work that saved us by His grace through faith.
They refused to believe even the documented miracles in the NT, and said salvation depends on our own merit and works, by paying for our own sins. Also saying heaven is a state, not a place; the Textus Receptus (of which the KJV were written by 14 of greatest scholars at the time who actually spoke those ancient languages) is a villainous, vile, perverted texts…
Also “Jesus bearing and dying for our sins is a universal heresy” and Hort said: “ I don't see how God’s justice can be satisfied without everyone suffering in his own person and paying full penalty for their own sins”….Wow!
They also had connections to the occult, spiritism and necromancy, themselves establishing and joining such groups who involved in these things.
These two scholars had absolutely no respect of the authority of God’s Word, valuing the Pope’s and the clergy’s views and teachings above God’s written Word.
JWs have also been using up until 1953(?) a New Testament version that’s been written by a German priest called Johannes Greber, who made his translation by the help of the spirit world. According to him he has literally been dictated by spirit entities this work, also his own wife being a spirit medium…
So the combined efforts of these three guys have succeeded with a “Bible translation” that is literally came from the spirit world and been influenced by the occult and total aetheism and blasphemies of Westcott and Hort.
This is the short version….
There is sooooo much more, which if I’d say… well, loads of people won’t be happy.
Yes, biased, made up, blasphemous and sadly a big fat lie….
So you were absolutely correct on your observation…
The name "Jesus" is unfortunately a deception. The Father's name is YAHUAH יהוה. The name of the Son contains the name of the Father: he is called YAHUSHA יהושע which means "Yahuah is salvation" in Hebrew. YAHU is short for Yahuah and SHA שע means salvation.
Be careful about being radical about using the Hebrew and Greek. It’s not necessary, use your common language otherwise you’ll confuse people that you engage with the Gospel! Blessings on you! 📖
@@davidmason9925 This is obviously what religions tell you....
There is no letter J in the hebrew language, Yahuah Elohiym, and his true sons name is Yahusha , over 500 years ago, the letter J was put in there Alphabet, remember Yahusha was a hebrew all lies to deceive man from the truth plz look into this our lives depend on the truth , seek and Yahuah will reveal the truth Amien ❤❤🙏🙏
There are 46 possible renderings of YHWH. Take your pick, and whichever one you pick, don't get too attached to the idea that you're correct.
A Jewish scribal group the Masoretes of the 6th century claimed to have removed the tetragrammaton in places where it appeared in the Christian Greek scriptures (aka the New Testament) manuscripts of the bible. They had replaced it with adhonay (Lord) which practice modern day translators had carried on. Jesus condemned the Jewish religious leaders of his day for side-stepping and making God's word invalid by their importance on Jewish traditions like avoidance of using or pronouncing God's name whenever they came upon it in reading the scriptures.
That was so interesting!! Really good research there..! Thanks for showing us this! 👍
Unfortunately this only seems technicality comparing with the NWT’s blasphemy and interpretation of Scripture…
Really good and interesting work on this research, thanks so much!
Did they put the child sacrifice part in it? I know 1 translator claiming that it does not exist in the original text.
Each denomination has its own canon, Catholic, Presbyterian, Orthodox, JW, Mormon, etal. Even the ones that use some version of the KJV will pick and choose which passages to acknowledge and which to ignore. This has been the case for centuries. Question all Bible scripture. None is sacred, it was all written by middle eastern Hebrew Jews attempting to gather followers. Editing began with the very first translation into Greek. The nature of the creator is misrepresented throughout.
Verses John 8:1-11 are missing in NWT (STUDY EDITION & 2013 REVISION) but you will find them in 1984 NWT, Greek interlinear, KJV and other bible versions. Now why is that? Who omiited those verses? Think.... Think... Think...
The King James Bible has 66 books in it, the Catholic Bible has 73 books,and the Eastern Church has 81 books, what a mess
Its sad that they are so desperate for knowledge with so little brain capacity.
The enemy's sales pitch about knowing what God knows has taken a hold on them. Just like Adam and Eve. Jesus is the only way. 1 Tim 3:16
It’s not so much Brain capacity as it is their denial of the Person of the Holy Spirit! That error in their teaching is “Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” !!!
Yes, like David Mason said; it’s not so much about their brain, they’re so so zealous…but not according to knowledge.
They honestly and truthfully and genuinely seeking truth, but been duped into listening to their religious leaders (like most religions) rather than scripture, being told they can not understand scripture without their interpretation and they (the regular members) not supposed to interpret it for themselves… because “what do they understand without the WT/GB?” So they’re stuck… Not realising that the Truth is a person….Jesus himself. Not a religion, ideology or doctrine. Salvation is a person, Life itself is a person, reconciliation, redemption, grace, mercy, love….all the same person! Yeshuah/Jesus our amazing Saviour 🙏💪💖👍
@@praiseofhisgrace3178but didnt Jesus say he would always be with his true disciples even until the End of this system of things?
@@roeltingzon758 Exactly!
in John 14:16 Jesus identifies the Comforter who abides with us forever as the Spirit of Truth. Jesus is Truth. And then in verse 18 He says "I will not leave you comfortless, I will come to you"... He'll be with us with his Spirit of truth, living in all true believers
With JW everithing is premeditated.
No mention of the word BIBLE... why?
That's a good question...! Well, i guess they can no longer call it that, as it has been so chopped and butchered, with things taken out and added everywhere, its no longer recognisable as God's written Word; the Bible...
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Good question you say. Really! Good question. Is the word "Bible" sanctified and biblically commanded to be used once all the books are compiled into one?
The term "Bible" comes from the Greek word "Biblia," which means "books" or "scrolls." The Bible is a collection of sacred texts or scriptures considered authoritative in Christianity and Judaism.
Do you know what Paul considered as the " hiera grammata" is translated to in numerous *trinitarian bibles*? (2 Tim 3:15 - holy scriptures, sacred writings, sacred scriptures, holy scrolls, sacred letters) Yes so hopefully the insensibility of the original comment and the followed agreement is quite the moot remarks.
Nasb translators are not anonymous
Yes, body really knows the real form to pronounce of YHWH but it is the same witb all the ancient Hebrew names like Daniel, Jesús, Joseph, etc etc etc
I appreciate your content. I urge caution on one point. To knock them for not being scholars is a mistake. Were not Jesus' followers scorned for the same reason? Not having been taught at the religious schools at the time? Acts 4:13: 𝙉𝙤𝙬 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙨𝙖𝙬 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙣𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙋𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙅𝙤𝙝𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙥𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙚𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙪𝙣𝙚𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙢𝙚𝙣, 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙮 𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙙. NKJ
Too many so-called "experts" in the world today. Many of the points you make are spot on.
That said, they condemn other Bibles for taking out the name of God but then they add it in & have quite the justification for doing it! Point of interest on the name. About four years ago there was a group of rabbis that claimed they had found the missing vowels to the tetragrammaton and the actual pronunciation, in their evidence is "Jehovah." Big subject!
Great comment, thanks!
Yes, I’m not a scholar either, I just relay the finds my research granted me to find and present.
However there are numerous incontestable evidence that shows, this translation (I’m sorry I can’t call it that….so I’ll use the word interpretation) it’s not just biased,- scripture altered to fit doctrine-, but deliberately being cut, chopped and butchered to mislead the reader. Entire half chapters missing (John, Mark) with the weak and unproven excuse that they weren’t in the original manuscripts, words added and altered in the apostolic letters, especially those relating to Christ’s divinity (again; to fit their doctrine) …
In this video I didn’t even show a quarter of the scriptural discrepancies, but that’s not my aim anymore. Again; I’m not a scholar and the information to research is widely available to all to do.
But friend, rather I’d like to point you to Salvation himself, to the God who is with us; Emmanuel, Yeshua, Jesus: the Saviour of humanity and our high priest, the light of the world, life and resurrection himself, the Way, the Truth and the Life. Come to and believe in Him. 🙏💖
Thanks for your comment friend, truly appreciate it.
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Yes, I want to come to him. We did a deep dive on Rom 6 and it was an eye opener. I felt two things. Appalled that I had not given Jesus the proper place in my heart that he deserves and second, a feeling of freedom. Freedom from the pharisaical ways of WT.
To really feel the love he showed by offering up his life for us and that it is a free gift if I exercise faith. No work or keeping to a code of rules will earn that salvation. Your videos have been so helpful. May God bless you!
By doing research i have discovered that Jehovah is mentioned 666 times and the K.J.V Bible mentioned Jehovah 7 times Jesus is mentioned 777 times. Rev.Ch.13 v18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast; for it it is the number of a man ; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.
Wow! That’s amazing!
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 its not true i just checked. She wasted MY TIME and revelation 22:18 can now be applied to her
In the old testament alone the name is mentioned 407 Times in exodus
174 times in genesis
552 times in Deuteronomy
The Jehovah witnesses themselves say the complete number is 7000 WHICH YOU SHOULD KNOW.
May Jehovah Rebuke you
(Jesus is mentioned less than 5000 times)
You should have gone with the colour but i will let you work that one out seems you give misinformation
What Bible has Jehovah mentioned 666 times?
@@momentummusic7281 None!!!! 1 Thessalonians 5:21
Watchtower is not unwittingly doing anything lol...they know full well..enough already
How do I contact you?
Hi, my email is:
kegyelmedicserete@gmail.com
🙏
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 sent you a message
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Did you receive my email?
Jehovah name is in the KJV
Oh yes it is!
Hi Brother, what's wrong with Jehovah,
Thanks Brother
You mean big G or little G
@@BillWalters-kx8sw
Maybe both
Nothing apart from the fact that they admittedly use a name for God, that’s been made up by a “Christian” priest. Whom they label as God’s enemy… Just a bit hypocritical I thought…
Thanks for your question brother!
@@praiseofhisgrace3178
Thanks Brother, I believe the KJV is the word of God, but the name of Jehovah doesn't make sense, so this enemy had put the name there.
But why would God allow this?
Thanks
Praise of his Grace is very very dishonest if he is removing or hiding comments
I don’t do that… what makes you say that?
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 Well it should be obvious because comments have disappeared so if it ain’t you then who?
@@jahtruthdefender that's a mystery that I can't answer you...sorry!
So, where in any English Orthodox Bible is God's NAME found? Please, tell us, for all I see and read, specifically in the OT, are only the two Titles, "LORD" and "God". To my knowledge, Biblical Scholars are in agreement that God's NAME is WRITTEN in those OT Scriptures THOUSANDS of times. But, where is it WRITTEN in our English Bibles, pray tell?
You FAIL completely by quickly avoiding the MAIN issue, which is God's NAME. You barely touch the subject. Most KJV Bible toting Christians, most likely have no idea that the Title "LORD" is an English COVER UP word for the actual NAME of God Almighty, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. In other words, His NAME is not "LORD" rather His NAME is "YHVH". So, everywhere you see the Title "LORD" written in your KJV, please note that it is a SUBSTITUTE word for "YHVH". God's NAME as written in the OT Scriptures is "YHVH".
Now, using our God given brains, we can actually see that the four letter NAME of God, "YHVH", if we use vowel sounds, will come out looking somewhat like this, "YaHaVaH". What does that look like? What pronunciation would seem more correct, "Jehovah", "Yahaveh", "Yahweh", "Yahushua", etc.? Scholars have yet to figure out the pronunciation of the Biblical God's NAME, but it sure ain't "LORD". The English speaking world is still being deceived by English Bible Translators by blatantly COVERING UP God Almighty's NAME by using a SUBSTITUTE word, i.e., "LORD", thousands of times. God said that "His NAME" should be and will be KNOWN, not HIDDEN.
Why attack the "JEHOVAH'S witnesses", when it seems THEY at least do not go around calling YHVH God Almighty "LORD" nor are they trying to HIDE His NAME. YHWH is our "GOD"; YHWH is the ONE and ONLY TRUE God; YHVH is the Father of the Lord Jesus (or Joshua if you so desire) and the God and Father of all Believers in Christ His human Son.
The written Scriptures are not "confusing". The NAME of God is "YHVH" and not "LORD", so why do ALL Orthodox English Translators insist, yeah, demand that His NAME be COVERED UP? Not on my watch!
Hello, thanks for commenting and your interest.
First of all let me address your first objection: God’s “name” found in the KJV x4 places: Psalms 83:18, Exodus 6:3, Isaiah 12:2, Isaiah 26:4
The topic of my video is Watchtower’s efforts to falsify and pervert Scripture by changing, adding, taking away and changing passages. Not about the name of God.
And every Bible believing Christian KNOWS that God’s name YHWH IS in the OT thousands of times and also know that “LORD” ISNT God’s personal name, but rather just a title.
So if you yourself admit that even Bible scholars didn’t figure out the exact prononciation of God’s name, (because no one knows what it actually sounded like); then the WHOLE argument is futile, because it makes no difference then if you use a title, or just keep guessing what it could be exactly.
God Himself states in His own words when speaking to Moses that his name is I AM…. (Exodus 3:14)Or “I shall prove to be/I Will Become What I Choose to Become.”(JW version)
He addresses Himself by a quality, an attribute, a pronoun….not a literal name? Are you going to question Him over that?
So by your own argument you sabotage your own point, because if you do not use and pronounce it EXACTLY as it should be, (because we don’t know it) than it is WRONG. And then so using a title is not less wrong than using an incorrect guess-work based name. No?
What’s important is rather than what it actually sounds like, is what it represents and sands for. And that is: FATHER….that’s what Jesus taught to His disciples and others, when He said: “I have made your name known to them”. They were Jews, EVERY Jew knew the name of God. Jesus wanted people to know God: His Father, as OUR Father…. Not by a personal name that millennia’s later no one would be able to pronounce.
And so just because the WT restores this “name” in the Bible, it doesn’t make their “Bible”version any less false, corrupted and taking away Jesus’s divinity; reducing Him to mere creature, an angel or just a good man to be taken as a man example for us.
Now that is blasphemous and I won’t have that under MY watch!
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 You changed the subject of my comment. It was not the "pronunciation" of the NAME but the NAME itself. The NAME of God in Scripture should be written or transliterated as "YHVH", the tetragrammaton instead of HIDING it behind a Title. In other words a Title is NOT a NAME, therefore the thousands of times the NAME "YHVH" is mentioned in Scripture it should be written with His NAME and nothing else.
And no, most Christians do not know that God's NAME is "YHVH". I venture to say that most believe His NAME is "I am", which is incorrect. YHVH told Moses that He "would be whomever He wished to be", in other words He was telling Moses THE MEANING of His NAME.
What anyone's Name MEANS is a different matter. Christians go around saying God's Name is "I am", which is ridiculous, and will defend their stance "till the cows come home". But, they, and you, are WRONG. God's NAME in Scripture, as revealed thousands of times by holy men of God is "YHVH" and NO OTHER.
I said the JWs are more correct in that they translate, into English, the NAME of God, as best they can, i.e., JHVH, that is, "Jehovah", which is a Name and not a Title. So why do y'all translate the NAME of God with the Title "LORD", in the OT? Why not just transliterate into "YHVH"? What are y'all afraid of?
On a Contract, is it ok to replace someone's Name with a Title. God wrote, through His men, His own NAME in the Scriptures, and hundreds of years later some men decided NOT to write it down but instead to REPLACE IT and to HIDE God's TRUE Name from His word, and according to you and others that's perfectly fine!! Give me a break.
Watch your double standard. What is the English Name of the Son of God? If you answer anything other than "Jesus" you are WRONG. You cannot say that his Name is "Lord", or "Christ", or "the Lamb", or "the Door", or "the Way", etc. Yet, according to y'all, it's perfectly ok to Replace the NAME of God, i.e., "YHVH", with whatever pops into y'all's little brains. He only has ONE NAME, why not use it, even as He COMMANDED, instead of using a Title or a Meaning of a Name?
So, I will keep proclaiming the NAME of God, which is "YHVH", and which can be pronounced as "Yahweh",or "Jehovah", or "Yahushua", or in any similar pronunciation which glorifies the tetragrammaton NAME "YHVH".
How about correcting your English Bibles by actually writing down the NAME of God wherever it is supposed to be WRITTEN down, instead of that ignominious title of "LORD". I think I would get very angry if people were to exchange my Name in my Will and Testament to "Sergeant". That won't happen, not on my watch!
Thank you. Noted.
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 I appreciate your kindness.
And I appreciate your zeal, knowledge and standing up for God’s Holy name. God bless you🙏
Misleading video..the name of Jesus in the bible is little, he was called Rabbi, lord, Christ, messiah and others....Gods name was mentions thousands times more but modern translations removed it,,so video should be why did other bibles remove Gods name...Bag whom you wish but just focus on click bait isnt fair, tell the truth.....Orginal translations rarely used the name Jesus, in fact if i recall its around 10 times and talk about translations, you have no idea ie mentioning a spanish monk,,,,All words from any language have to start somewhere as you cannot translate a word to another 100% as its an fabrication of the meaning into another foreign word,,,in some cases can seem completely different to general public....plus in some countries they dont have a translated word for Jesus, God, house, Computer, scuba diving,,,just a few examples of how complex translation is.... Have you ever thought how you translate your name into Chinese? It dont exsist....Your name dont exsist so they make ome up for locals so they try to understand or make up a word which may sound the same but mean completely different
Sorry adjustment,,,orginal translations had zero name ie Jesus,,,but translations after named it Jesus in few areas and slowly got more and more
Deut, 4:1-2, The scriptures were written by the prophets which is intended for physical Israelites, Jehovah spoke to them in their dreams, visions, no one literally seen him, @Ex,33:20, Therefore,we cannot expects that their prophecies were perfect, @1st,Cor,13:9, Paul said, "when perfect comes,the partial shall be done away,, There is one very important fact for all Jw's critics, they must learned that the scriptures were intended for physical Israelites, but since they were rejected, all rules and laws were abolished by God, then, the Kingdomship of God was given to the prophecized New Spiritual Israelites, which is the Jw's organization, @Matt,12:46-50/ v, 21:43/ Jesus affirmed these, @ Lam, 2:6-7,/ Lukes,4:18-31/
They haven't put Substitutes in 2 Cor 5:20 for a antichrist reason ,if you read the American Standard Version (bible) its uses the word " behalf" so very similar
Or is the American Standard version wrong too ??😊
I think the main problem is that they wipe out Christ and really substitute him with their Governing Body. They teach not to listen to Jesus but the GB how "speaks on the voice of Jesus".
Yes I have noticed this quite a bit in their Wachtower and Awakes ...but they definitely believe and teach about Jesus in their publications as well.
The reason for the increase of the GB in their publications I think is the nearing of Armageddon ,(end of this system of things) and they want JW to trust and rely on them more than ever
@@profitorigo
Jesus sets us free indeed
I was talking about the NWT….
But thanks for pointing it out, I didn’t know that
Is this a no to the God that Jesus worships?
John 4:22
Ephesians 1:17
Hey, so only the Father we should worship…? John 5:23
1John 2:23
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 is this a yes to the God of Jesus?
Your answer is in Scripture…
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 is that a yes to the God of Jesus?
Revelation 3:12
The god of the Jews it's clearly written in John 4:22 since that is the new testament it means the Jews are God's people
Benjamin Kedar Hebrew scholar has published that the NWT is one of the very best translations. JASON BEDUHN in his book TRUTH IN TRANSLATION demonstrates that the NWT is his number One choice for best translation.
Yes no new info about the translators . It is no secret who they were.
Thanks for commenting.
Did you actually read the NWT?
@praiseofhisgrace I am not a member of Jehovah's Witnesses. I have a number of the editions of the NWT. I prefer the 1984 edition.
Furthermore the cross references in the NWT are outstanding.
@@praiseofhisgrace3178This gentleman's video is very misleading and inaccurate.
What are your credentials?
These are silly arguments 🤦🏻♂️. But the worst part is your audience are drinking the kool aid that your serving them in your video.
Good presentation Sir. Watchtower is certainly a part of the NWO.
But Jesus is not God. Jehovah is God.
The real confusion begins with the blasphemous deletion of the tetragram YHVH in the OT, and "Substitution" of the word Lord, causing folks to imagine the lord Jesus in the reading.
Thank you for your comment!👍
Just the little detail that Jesus identifies himself as the First and Last, Beginning and the End, Alpha and Omega… These titles has only ONE person in the Old Testament. Not to mention: King of King and Lord of Lords…. In whose name EVERY knee bend and tongue shall acknowledge the He is Lord.
No?
You're right, YHWH (Jehovah) is God.
However, God consists of more than one person. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
At Deut 6:4 where YHWH declares that YHWH is one, the word used for one is "echad" which means a combined plurality.
That same word is used when God says at Gen 2:24 that a man and woman will be joined and become "one" (echad) flesh.
And there are several places in the OT where there is clearly more than one YHWH.
In Zech 2:7-12, YHWH is sent by YHWH. This is Jesus Christ in His pre-incarnate existence as God with God (John 1:1) who is sent to dwell in the midst of His people.
I suggest you read that very carefully and follow who is speaking to who.
This is just the tip of the ice berg from which the Trinity doctrine originates. Not from pagan beliefs.
Yes, it's from Genesis to Revelation and once you see it, you have to accept it.
Right on! Nice comment! Thanks 🙏
Jesus, Who was clearly monotheistic, he recited the Shema but then said, “He that has seen Me has seen the Father” John14:9 and, “ I and the Father are One.” John 10:30
Also, in reference to the Holy Spirit (The Comforter) He said, I will not leave you comfortless; I will come to you! John 14:18 Absolute proof of the Tri-unity of the Godhead! Water H2O is a good illustration. One substance having 3 parts which cannot be altered as to its composition; yet can be a liquid, a solid or a gas simply by its state; yet is unaltered! Keep seeking; you’re looking in the right direction ☝🏻Blessings! 📖
You are the one who is misleading. Just because Jesus' name only appears once in a shortened word index, at the back, that doesn't mean it's not in all the correct places where it should be in the rest of the Christian Greek scriptures.
Also, if you are an ambassador speaking on behalf of someone as Christians are speaking in behalf of Christ, who gave them that ministry of the reconciliation, then in that context, you can be described as a substitute for that one, 2 Corinthians 5:20.
Hello again,
To show where their alliance, principles, honour and worship lies truly…their respect, acknowledgement and gratitude for the sacrifice of Jesus.
check out the background of Wescott and Hort… their interlinear writers. Look through the comments, I gave a brief background on them
Scholars are in agreement that the story of the woman caught in adultery was not authentic. Also Mark's account ends in 16:8. The verses following are later interpolations!!
You need to do better!!!
Your words:
“Jesus is not G-d. He was not the true mashiach and he is definitely not coming back. The so-called Apostle Paul never met the man Jesus and he was never a disciple of Gamaliel“
Calling yourself a believer, friend?
In who exactly ..?
@@praiseofhisgrace3178 He is Jewish, you can tell.
Not all scholars agree with that assessment. 📖
Jesus is not G-d. He was not the true mashiach and he is definitely not coming back. The so-called Apostle Paul never met the man Jesus and he was never a disciple of Gamaliel.
Go back with your atheist friends.
Your just spouting nonsense.
@@davidmcbrine4527 He is actually Jewish and Reject the Only begotten son God Jesus Christ. You can tell by his language. His is still waiting for the Messiah or “true mashiach” as he calls their Messiah.
Let’s pray for him to see the TRUE Messiah…! Isaiah 53..!!!!🙏💖🙏
Blah, blah, blah... I guess you know all these things because you were there, huh? Actually you are WRONG on all counts. He definitely IS coming back and you will one day bow your knee to Yeshua Hamashiach and will confess that he is Yahweh/LORD. Sooner is better.