I’d rather go back down to 24 MP if it means no rolling shutter. If A9 III is 24 MP, what sense is there in adding more in the A7 V. Plus we have the A7R series for high MP count
@@itsmealex9290 Sony A1 II has a fast 50Mpix sensor (higher resolution) and the A9 III already has a GLOBAL shutter (much faster sensor) so a stacked 33Mpix won't be competition to either. I also want a fast stacked 39Mpix sensor, which is required for full width 8K, not because I need 8K, but because it is very efficiently down-sampled to 4K and 1080p.
Sony wouldn’t do 44mp and encroach on the a1 series range. Sony also doesn’t like to let any of their cameras have fps over 10 u less they cost $6k+. That way people don’t pay attention to the fact they don’t let third party lenses shoot faster than 15fps. When your camera can’t shoot that fast it doesn’t matter. Bit if they could, then people would start to complain about the third party capabilities.
8k? I don't wanna see people's rash. Also 44mp with just a standard BSI cmos sensor? Man, that rolling shutter effect will be awful on video also the crap noise in low light. ugh. And don't get me started on overheating with that 8K in an entry level A7 body
Yes, would be greater to go with a 33mpix stacked sensor for more low light performance ! and finally include the pixel shift function with it ! / a brand new feature would be allso great, like a "shoulder display" on the left side (to be competitive to Fuji / Nikon) and to fill the useless waste of space there....
I think brands like Sony, Canon, Nikon should be inspired to produce less camera models but better cameras. One for mid budget and one for pro. That's all. The phone is able to steal the low budget market. I am tired to see some restrictions between close models just to have a difference. Canon like Nikon, few by few, go on all-in-one semipro or pro models.
I went Sony because Nikon was too far behind. I said screw Canon because they IMO screw their customers with their lack of 3rd party lenses and outrageous costs. With that being said though I am not all that thrilled with Sony and their business strategy. Why wasn't the A7V released before the A7RV? Why do they bastardize their entry levels? The A7 Iv is a meh camera IMO. The Nikon Z6III and the rumored Canon R6III clean the floor with the A7IV. It's just crap. Too old and should have had an upgrade already. I hope the A7V is worth staying with the system.
Sony A7iv is a "meh" camera? It produces fantastic images and has solid technology to help photographers. Only extremely niche photographers need "better" features than it provides. They recently added firmware updates that give focus stacking as well as compatibility with the remote camera app. Would be interested to see your work that you have outgrown the capabilities of an A7iv. And the A7Riv was released 2 years before the IV, and the IV has some features the RIV doesn't have so I'd hardly call the entry level "entry level. The Sony A7iv is 3 years old and I expect it will still be relevant and produce great images for another 7 years.
i wish sony would stop being stingy and put 6K and/or open gate on these $3000 cameras...lumix nikon canon all have 6K cameras under $3000. the s5ii can do 6K open gate and its only $1800. a full frame camera with 6K open gate as well as full frame 4K60 no crop is my dream.
Only incedibly lousy photographers will not get incredible images with this camera. Guess what will be lacking is mostly behind the viewfinder. No - will not get this one. My existing ones are more than up to the job - for me...
nada de eso es funcional, 4k a 120fps es mucho pedir, basta con el 4k a 60fps sensor completo, los 44mpx seria un error, ya que los 33mpx ya son demasiado, se volvería una cámara inútil, ya que para alta resolución estaría a7r , 8k exagerado , inútil, poco funcional, solo resulta 6k 8:9 sensor completo para sacar cortes horizontales y verticales o usar anamórficos, no tiene sentido un a7iv en estas fechas, seria un error, es mas útil un a7sIV con todas esas mejoras y llegando a los 20mpx para ofrecer fotografía básica y tener el sensor 6k disponible, mejor ciencia de color, mejores perfiles de color como lumix y fuji, mejorar el estabilizador y no hacerlo malo para vender el catalyst, pantalla mas grande para vista previa, prores, imagen menos procesada sin predominante de color ni enfoque digital, tarjeta sd tipo b, ia para hacer el rastreo de enfoque mas preciso, doble dual iso, en 4000 y 12,800, conectar disco duro usb-c,
I’d rather go back down to 24 MP if it means no rolling shutter. If A9 III is 24 MP, what sense is there in adding more in the A7 V. Plus we have the A7R series for high MP count
please no 44mgp rolling shutter, instead a new 33mgp stacked sensor with 15 fps, 4k 120 and the 4 ax lcd ....greets NL
You won't get a stacked sensor in the A7V. Sony has the A1 or A9 in its portfolio for this purpose
@@itsmealex9290 if not, to bad I dont get one🙂
@@itsmealex9290 maybe as a product to compete against the z6iii? like a half stacked sensor, so i mean, nikon uses sony sensor
@@bloodiex5812 In any case, it remains exciting. I don't believe in a stacked sensor, but it could well be that Sony will set a new standard again!
@@itsmealex9290 Sony A1 II has a fast 50Mpix sensor (higher resolution) and the A9 III already has a GLOBAL shutter (much faster sensor) so a stacked 33Mpix won't be competition to either. I also want a fast stacked 39Mpix sensor, which is required for full width 8K, not because I need 8K, but because it is very efficiently down-sampled to 4K and 1080p.
Is the hot shoe tight??? The one on the a7iv is too tight i can't mount my flashes or transmitters
I better see it have that 4-axis screen or we're going to have issues. No excuses Sony...
They are pretty good about leaking features down the product line I'm alm9st certain it will have it
Fully Artic is cool, 4 Axis is just awesome!
You‘re right！
Only thing I want is that super nice screen!
A7R5 soooo expensive
I just want open gate recording to finally come to Sony so I can record once and deliver aspect ratios
4k120 1.2x crop
33mp sensor and 12fps uncompressed raw.
Sony wouldn’t do 44mp and encroach on the a1 series range.
Sony also doesn’t like to let any of their cameras have fps over 10 u less they cost $6k+. That way people don’t pay attention to the fact they don’t let third party lenses shoot faster than 15fps.
When your camera can’t shoot that fast it doesn’t matter. Bit if they could, then people would start to complain about the third party capabilities.
I'd rather hear an actual human tell me things that I can just search on the internet, thanks.
Please test a7cii Nikon z7ii
As long as it gets the same subject detection tracking like the A7RV, I'll be happy. Hopefully, it's announced soon.
10 bit colours @ 120fps with better stabilization and reduced rolling shutter
8k? I don't wanna see people's rash. Also 44mp with just a standard BSI cmos sensor? Man, that rolling shutter effect will be awful on video also the crap noise in low light. ugh. And don't get me started on overheating with that 8K in an entry level A7 body
A9iii seems better bet without rolling shutter
I hope they don't push the crop issue in video on us again this year.
Do the other content creators know you stole video from their channels?
I think we will get a stacked sensor on the a7 series since each version is released in 3-4 years, the next release to have it will be too late.
Still Nikon Z6iii has a better config
Yes, not top screen in sony that's why m prefer Nikon...
Does Magic know you took videos from his RUclips to use for your channel…?
Yes, would be greater to go with a 33mpix stacked sensor for more low light performance ! and finally include the pixel shift function with it ! / a brand new feature would be allso great, like a "shoulder display" on the left side (to be competitive to Fuji / Nikon) and to fill the useless waste of space there....
I think brands like Sony, Canon, Nikon should be inspired to produce less camera models but better cameras. One for mid budget and one for pro. That's all. The phone is able to steal the low budget market.
I am tired to see some restrictions between close models just to have a difference.
Canon like Nikon, few by few, go on all-in-one semipro or pro models.
We want the A7siv!
They just refreshed this 2 years ago. The a7s3 is 5 years old and outdated
@canesecco che ci fai in questo video?
Just one hope for Sony camera: Get rid of the ugly green-yellowish cast on skin colour.
I went Sony because Nikon was too far behind. I said screw Canon because they IMO screw their customers with their lack of 3rd party lenses and outrageous costs. With that being said though I am not all that thrilled with Sony and their business strategy. Why wasn't the A7V released before the A7RV? Why do they bastardize their entry levels? The A7 Iv is a meh camera IMO. The Nikon Z6III and the rumored Canon R6III clean the floor with the A7IV. It's just crap. Too old and should have had an upgrade already. I hope the A7V is worth staying with the system.
Sony A7iv is a "meh" camera? It produces fantastic images and has solid technology to help photographers. Only extremely niche photographers need "better" features than it provides. They recently added firmware updates that give focus stacking as well as compatibility with the remote camera app. Would be interested to see your work that you have outgrown the capabilities of an A7iv. And the A7Riv was released 2 years before the IV, and the IV has some features the RIV doesn't have so I'd hardly call the entry level "entry level. The Sony A7iv is 3 years old and I expect it will still be relevant and produce great images for another 7 years.
Anyone says the A7M4 is a "meh" camera clearly does not know what he's talking about.. So ignore him @@photoedits4165
CFexpress Type A! Yes lets take out a loan for data storage
NVMe 4tb with 7000MB/s costs 290$
Like what the hell is wrong with the industry
But how much? My wallet can't handle it. 😅
i wish sony would stop being stingy and put 6K and/or open gate on these $3000 cameras...lumix nikon canon all have 6K cameras under $3000. the s5ii can do 6K open gate and its only $1800. a full frame camera with 6K open gate as well as full frame 4K60 no crop is my dream.
Big price increase
Only incedibly lousy photographers will not get incredible images with this camera. Guess what will be lacking is mostly behind the viewfinder.
No - will not get this one. My existing ones are more than up to the job - for me...
nikon z6iii
nada de eso es funcional, 4k a 120fps es mucho pedir, basta con el 4k a 60fps sensor completo, los 44mpx seria un error, ya que los 33mpx ya son demasiado, se volvería una cámara inútil, ya que para alta resolución estaría a7r , 8k exagerado , inútil, poco funcional, solo resulta 6k 8:9 sensor completo para sacar cortes horizontales y verticales o usar anamórficos, no tiene sentido un a7iv en estas fechas, seria un error, es mas útil un a7sIV con todas esas mejoras y llegando a los 20mpx para ofrecer fotografía básica y tener el sensor 6k disponible, mejor ciencia de color, mejores perfiles de color como lumix y fuji, mejorar el estabilizador y no hacerlo malo para vender el catalyst, pantalla mas grande para vista previa, prores, imagen menos procesada sin predominante de color ni enfoque digital, tarjeta sd tipo b, ia para hacer el rastreo de enfoque mas preciso, doble dual iso, en 4000 y 12,800, conectar disco duro usb-c,
on sera plus proche des 3000$ que des 2000 😅
CANON va réagir....
Will they though? The R1 certainly didn't compete with Sony's flagship
Juste des spéculations, rien de concret!
Sony A 7 Mk 16 ?😂
When was Sony taken over by Apple..Talk RUclips talk.
a75 et pk pas mon cul aussi! Y en a marre de toutes ces vidéos auto générées par ia et qui racontent nimp!