Starfield Comparison - Xbox Series X vs. Xbox Series S: How do the 2 consoles perform?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 янв 2025

Комментарии • 35

  • @chilicheesejay
    @chilicheesejay Год назад +8

    Picked up a Series S at Disc Replay for 200 bucks a day ago so I could play this! Can't wait

  • @Seanybiker
    @Seanybiker Год назад +7

    I have the X but to be fair the S is a very capable console for little money.

  • @vanceg4901
    @vanceg4901 Год назад +9

    Perhaps future FSR3 implementation on XSX/XSS will improve things in a meaningful way?, we can hope.

    • @tchib45130
      @tchib45130 Год назад

      Impossible, fsr3 only works with game targetting 60fps before utilisation
      And that's a lil performance cost, too much for series s

    • @vanceg4901
      @vanceg4901 Год назад +3

      @@tchib45130 - Bethesda will use the Xbox Series Secret Sauce and make Starfield 60 fps on XSX/XSS. Then FSR 3 can be used, see how simple that is.

    • @tchib45130
      @tchib45130 Год назад +1

      @@vanceg4901 impossible, ran 30fps with fsr2, in dynamic 900p, drop to 400
      Fsr3 need 60fps target game before reconstruction
      You can't double framerate with a low resolution, could be half, too many artefacts and blurry

    • @HaloinfiniteEternal
      @HaloinfiniteEternal Год назад +2

      @@tchib45130that’s not true at all man and AMD already confirmed it’s gonna be fully featured on Consoles…….
      It can work better if the base frame rate is 60fps but that’s not a requirement

    • @tchib45130
      @tchib45130 Год назад +2

      @@HaloinfiniteEternal read again AMD, not for games less than 60fps
      Too much artefacts and issues

  • @dkmail1
    @dkmail1 Год назад +16

    This game is a masterpiece... I cannot stop playing since last night

    • @MichaelM28
      @MichaelM28 Год назад +2

      It's terrible xbot

    • @dkmail1
      @dkmail1 Год назад +3

      ​@@MichaelM28go away...go play Spiderman or something...

    • @WeskerGamer-ds8gh
      @WeskerGamer-ds8gh 10 месяцев назад

      @@MichaelM28gaystation fans are always the worst ones 😅

  • @peterslaboratory6070
    @peterslaboratory6070 Год назад +3

    Love your comparison videos.
    Would be interesting to see if this will get a uncapped fps mod like Fallout 4 got.

  • @urbanmidnight1
    @urbanmidnight1 Год назад +5

    The Series S has enough power to run next gen games at 1080p-1440p. There's barely any difference here, for £250 extra is it really worth the Series X version for slightly higher textures and a few rocks?

    • @tchib45130
      @tchib45130 Год назад

      Série s is dynamic 900p
      ran 400p to 900p (watch ign analyse video) and can freeze in the city with drop to zero frame (digital foundry video)
      Difference graphical level is huge on a big screen like oled tv, look ign or digital foundry comparative, or elanalista
      Immortal of aveum ue5 ran 436p on series s
      Matrix awakens was just 560p, halo 530p in perf mode, just 516p on metro exodus
      Stop dreaming, no power for new gen games with 8gb 224gbps ram

    • @blacklung7474
      @blacklung7474 Год назад

      @@tchib45130 Have been playing for more than 10 hours, and never once have i seen the resolution drop. Also played metro exodus and it's fine. Matrix awakens 864p. Halo performance mode is for 120fps and not meant for normal play at 60.

  • @jbsecret4416
    @jbsecret4416 Год назад +4

    It’s crazy how well runs on the series S 😮

  • @markwest-sooby
    @markwest-sooby Год назад +2

    They can't release a performance mode for the game because it's CPU limited. Downgrading the resolution and the graphics settings wouldn't solve that problem. The CPUs in these two consoles are simply too weak to run the game anywhere close to a consistent 60fps. They might even struggle to run it consistently above 45-50fps.

    • @eljusticiero322
      @eljusticiero322 Год назад +1

      Sooby said

    • @markwest-sooby
      @markwest-sooby Год назад

      @@eljusticiero322What do you mean?

    • @mikaelco5341
      @mikaelco5341 Год назад

      the cpu is 3.5ghz tho that’s a decent cpu

    • @nnaheim.
      @nnaheim. Год назад

      ​@@markwest-soobySooby said so lol

    • @markwest-sooby
      @markwest-sooby Год назад

      @@nnaheim. Sorry I’m not understanding the joke

  • @skinnyboycole_TTV
    @skinnyboycole_TTV Год назад +1

    Series s looks pixelated

  • @roystonvasey5471
    @roystonvasey5471 Год назад +1

    So... is it Skyrim in space?

  • @Cmdr_DarkNite
    @Cmdr_DarkNite Год назад

    So, I have a Series S and one of those portable screens that makes it look like a laptop. I have a few questions for anyone who can answer them.
    1. My TV is a 4k60 TV, but I have a Series S. Should I just keep it at Auto 4k or should I manually set it to 1440p?
    2. I've heard a few people saying it looks a bit better with HDR off. I've yet to try this and I'm about to go to sleep, have anyone tried it? Should I turn it off? Its going to turn off automatically once I manually set it to 1440p.

    • @nnaheim.
      @nnaheim. Год назад

      1. Earp. Wyatt Earp
      2. Ratta tan tan, 3 mice in a pan.

  • @AgentRupal
    @AgentRupal Год назад +1

    Series S is rock solid 😅. Just joking

  • @alessandrocipriani1424
    @alessandrocipriani1424 Год назад +1

    Xbox series s Is optimaized like shit, ok 30 FPS, but really 900p Is good? If its good so Just buy and Xbox One e play starfield on it. Also Xbox series x Is shit , like come on , how can't run at native 4k. This Is not a next gen title and Is not a true exclusive game. if it runs like this on the ONLY consoles where must shine , so we are not at a good achievemet.

  • @MichaelM28
    @MichaelM28 Год назад

    Spider-Man 2 > trashfield