He is the most Knowledgable Bar association president I had seen … 👏🏻.. Thank You Vishas Jii.. for giving opportunities to hear such luminaries lectures ❤
Lalita kumari judgement appears more as sermon when it says, no prejudices caused or no investigation necessary. Jab khud par aati hai to sara gyan nikal jaata hai, like Mr. Gogoi shouting from bench when he was umpited. With no investigation, naukri chali jayegi. 41A is again for rich because police Or complainant always invoke serious offences in attempt or conspiracy. In email, lawyer will be typing at his office and complainant giving 65b certificate Now in courts we have, police FIR, then 200 and both can come exist simultaneously. Such interpretation are so prone to use in commercial disputes, neighborhood, matrimonial involing posco, 354,376 ipc. Territorial jurisdiction is necessary else it is police station shopping like happens in court. Why commercial disputes are never criminal
Sabko jail bhejna chahte ho. But as commercial disputes are money minting, thus as always projected unless we have vijaya malya, nirav modi, these are commercial civil disputes. But again, this can always be matter of offence, if read minutely. apna client hota hai to har cheej kharab lagti hai, if from accused but enjoys, if from complainant side. If company holds employee salary, it is lein, civil dispute and he may die pnnyless paying legal charges, but when same employee hold company asset, it is breach of trust, that's the hypocrisy of our thinking, instead of making it equal treatment by each other. It will be further interesting, how political parties will use zero fir, and now whether, there is a need to file multiple fir, we see in speech cases because the argument was, i am not expected to go to that place.
Sir I am selected as a civil judge because of your RUclips webinars thank you so much sir 💐... your webinar very helpful to reach my goal
Keep it up and thank you for appreciating
He is the most Knowledgable Bar association president I had seen … 👏🏻.. Thank You Vishas Jii.. for giving opportunities to hear such luminaries lectures ❤
It's a pleasure to read your thoughts.
Sir, I am selected as Asst Public
Prosecutor,I learnt more from Beyond law clc webinars,Thanku very much sir, keep it up sir..
All the best for the new venture.Happy for you
Thank you for appreciating it.
Thank you beyond law CLC
Nice presentation sir
Keep watching
Excellent
Thank you! Cheers!
Very useful lecture by Respected Asim Sir. Very lucidly explained🙏🏻
Keep watching
Sir it's very good webinar thanks a lot for depth knowledge
Glad you found it useful.
So nice of you for appreciating it.
Excellent Sir 🎉🎉🎉
Keep watching
CAN THE HIGH COURT BE APPROACHED TO QUASH THE ORDER OF PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY AFTER BEING ARRESTED UNDER SEC 41 CRPC?
SIR, PLEASE ENLIGHTEN WHETHER THESE NEW ACTS WILL COME INTO FORCE FROM 1ST JULY 2024.
Preliminary Enquiry demystified 🙏
Sir, Difrence between Enquiry and Investigation
Lalita kumari judgement appears more as sermon when it says, no prejudices caused or no investigation necessary. Jab khud par aati hai to sara gyan nikal jaata hai, like Mr. Gogoi shouting from bench when he was umpited. With no investigation, naukri chali jayegi. 41A is again for rich because police Or complainant always invoke serious offences in attempt or conspiracy. In email, lawyer will be typing at his office and complainant giving 65b certificate
Now in courts we have, police FIR, then 200 and both can come exist simultaneously. Such interpretation are so prone to use in commercial disputes, neighborhood, matrimonial involing posco, 354,376 ipc.
Territorial jurisdiction is necessary else it is police station shopping like happens in court.
Why commercial disputes are never criminal
Sabko jail bhejna chahte ho. But as commercial disputes are money minting, thus as always projected unless we have vijaya malya, nirav modi, these are commercial civil disputes. But again, this can always be matter of offence, if read minutely. apna client hota hai to har cheej kharab lagti hai, if from accused but enjoys, if from complainant side.
If company holds employee salary, it is lein, civil dispute and he may die pnnyless paying legal charges, but when same employee hold company asset, it is breach of trust, that's the hypocrisy of our thinking, instead of making it equal treatment by each other.
It will be further interesting, how political parties will use zero fir, and now whether, there is a need to file multiple fir, we see in speech cases because the argument was, i am not expected to go to that place.
Excellent