I didn't realize people were were claiming to be "AI artists" I have been part of the artist community as a consumer, not an artist, but I still have seen many times the amount of effort that goes into art, it still amazes me. Even though I like AI art, I don't like people like that saying they are artists. Claiming to be an AI artist is just a funny way of saying "Thought up a few ideas and clicked a button until something cool came out." Actual artists, not just traditional artists, takes so much more time and effort.
I fully agree, I think that AI art can be pretty dope but just the fact that some people brag about winning in competitions with it and them saying how much effort it took them to make it... feels kinda crushing ngl
What if they use ai arts as a medium for them to draw on them. For an example, they use an ai to create a drawing and put it on a canvas. Then they draw the blank part of the canvas with whatever creativity they have. Is that count as ai art?
@@misterdaydream964 yeah thats making art, that'd be pretty similar to using a photo, stock image or another drawing as a background to draw on. You're still actually adding something to the piece and creating something new, totally different from just typing a few words in and having an AI do it all.
I'm worried for the future of everyone. Two years ago one guy at the party wouldn't believe me when I told him that AI will be able to create art, for him it sounded insane, as if humans could be replaced even at creativity and technically... Yeah. If we can be replaced even when it comes to creative tasks : basic ones will be replaced just as efficiently, it looks pretty bad on us lmao
If you're the one who developed the AI that can make a great piece of art, you deserve to be proud. But if you just the user and brag about it that's kinda lame
If you're the one who made the brush and mixed the paint that can make a great piece of art, you deserve to be proud. But if you're just the user and brag about it that's kinda lame. Point being: Merely wielding a brush doesn't make you an artist, and mere wielding of AI tools doesn't, either. You can't tell whether someone's an artist by what medium they're using but by how they're using it: Writing a prompt and getting a result that will be artistically interesting are two quite different things, absolute hacks will often produce absolute garbage with bad colours, bad composition, bad themes, bad everything using either AI tools or brushes. Salty that AI artists can't wield a brush or have an intimate knowledge of colour perception and its tripfalls and still get good results? Well, so do 3d artists. A painted image of just a wine glass with all the right caustics is certainly more impressive from the craft POV than a rendered one -- but, ultimately, that's craft value, not artistic. It's still a simple wine glass from that perspective, the additional craft value doesn't elevate its meaning.
@@aoeuable the process of making art is completely different from that of AI art making. One solely requires prompts while the other requires a physical(like moving your hand around the piece) process of painting or sculpting, even in digital media. Before you say photography, it's still a physical process, not just clicking a button(as some critics may say). It's about finding the correct angle, lighting, composition and more, most of which must be manipulated by the photographer before making a shot. I don't hate AI art. I respect the process, and I like the art. However, I hate when AI "artists" refer to themselves as such, when they're only creating prompts and leaving most of the handiwork to AI.
@@Lucien_M If you don't understand composition, lightning, and more you also won't get good results out of AI tools, that's my very point. To get good results out of AI you need to either do *very* lengthy prompt massaging, massage things afterwards using ordinary 2d graphics programs, or both. And, just for the record, no, I'm not an AI artist. I'm a programmer with enough Blender chops to get something out there that doesn't completely suck. Maybe the difference is that I know how those tools work and how much *not* magic and not intelligent they are, When AIs ever become good enough to replace actual artists they'll form a union and insist on proper payment, we're absolutely not there yet.
So true. I saw at some Discord server, where random guy shared AI images and told something like "Omg, i added to AI Linkin Park's song lyrics and it created beautiful images! I did amazing job!!11" and other people was like "Omg, you're amazing artist!" Like... whyyy????
AI should take over some planing stuff so people have more time to create art. Not otherwise! Also imagine calling yourself a writer after browsering around and just coping some chapters of other people books/fanficts/works and editing it a little bit.
I think there can be some artistic merit to it but it’s a completely different category and should not win competitions where people actually created pieces by hand.
it isnt how good it looks, its the creators effort and emotion that makes it art, its certainly an amazing achievement for computer technology but its not an atwark in my eyes
@@tauriietauriie6009 Yeah. Sure, AI art may look cool sometimes but it probably doesn’t have as much of the expression and effort you’d get from human art. Plus you might want something in someone else’s artstyle, the artstyle of a person. Just commission a human artist if you want art. Actual work’s put behind it and it also helps to support an artist that may be starving and living solely off of instant ramen. -Plus if you want something more specific like the Singularity from Dead by Daylight in a Skull Merchant themed costume with the colour scheme of the Dredge, AI art will not give you what you want.-
I will say as an both an artists and designer as well an enthusiast of the medium/hobby it really frustrates me to hear how people keep saying AI won't take over artist or groahic deisigner jobs. Seeing how easy it it is to produce work that even if it steals previously existent work. It's so dam effecient for people that just want to make a quick but with putting ZERO effort into the work.
I wish more people pointed out the need and wish of being part of this group of "artists" or have that title There's so much obsession with language and words when it comes to art, artists, or animations. It's this need to not be excluded that to me looks toxic and cultish. Along with this "community" (Half of the artists don't say they are in a community though I guess, so that's good) Here's the thing. Would you be happy if instead of being called an AI Artist, you would be called something else that's accurate and not demeaning? I bet most wouldn't, I would actually bet money on it. There's also no universe where you would not be excluded or looked down upon by artists if this was the case. People are obsessed with getting that title of AI Artist (or discouraging it). It's just very flawed and I feel like the only solution is being the louder voice and making sure what YOU believe goes through (not what's right or what isn't). In another world, they have no motivation to be called an artist, I could give a realistic solution, like just giving them another word that still says that what they posted is cool. In this world, you have to change language and history entirely. Edit: I guess not everyone is obsessed, some are just ignorant. Everyone who defends the term "AI Artist" must be obsessed or feel attacked though.
Unrelated: I really like artists that don't say they are in a community, or at least the ones I haven't seen them say it because they don't say it multiple times a week. I also like artists that don't interact too much on social media because that makes it easier to find art, and also many of those don't enjoy sending the ocassional hate mobs with no remorse
@@cinder_ My comment tries to portray the motivation for these people to call themselves an artist, and point out a problem that involves anyone that has something to do with art (not just artists, but people that enjoy art) It also explains how the "artist community" is toxic and how they are the cause of motivating people to get the title of "an artist" one way or another
I think that both ai artists and "old-school" artists deserve a lot of respect. After all, creativity is what matters. I imagine it was a similar thing back in the day when digital art was getting started.
It wasn't similar, you still need skill to draw using digitalize items like brushes and pens for digital art but if you're gonna tell me that typing keywords and phrases for a computer generated pictures made up of thousands of stolen legit artworks is also considered as 'art'. Then, might as well make a kolaj by hand. Atleast you made an effort in doing kolaj.
digital art programs are literally just a combination of mimicking existing traditional tools dumped into a computer program. Every stroke is done by the artist themselves. The hate digital art got was uncalled for due to this specific reason. You're still the one doing the art, not the computer. Having pixels stained with colour vs paper granules being stained have no basic difference aside from one being physical and the other virtual. As someone who does both digital and traditional art, this argument makes me so mad.
If someone makes a beautiful piano piece on a computer instead of playing a physical piano do they deserve no credit? it still takes some level of imagination and creativity + time to craft the perfect image after a thousand failed attempts If people have their own unique style with an AI that they become recognised for I think theyre an artist.
I literally make digital art. I made IT on the computer and I can assure you this is not the same. It sounds interesting but I haven't found yet anyone who would have fully THEIR recognizable "ai artstyle" since it's all a mashup of stolen art.
@@tauriietauriie6009 Steal from one person that's plagiarism, steal from many that is research and inspiration, that is art, nothing is ever truly original but building on what's come before New simpler art styles probably since classical antiquity have been scoffed at because theyre "easier to do" and takes less technical skill, yes this now takes zero practical skill but I do think a new generation of interesting stuff will develop from it I do think its pretentious for someone to call themselves an "ai artist" but I also think its a little pretentious to think someone couldnt become an interesting artist that expresses themselves through ai In conclusion, idk.
Artists trying so hard to protect a title that's going to be pretty much worthless soon. Who cares about an artist that can make something in a week or day when everyone else can do it in secs? It's like those hyperreal painters that can produce images that look like they were taken with a camera. Outside the 2 min gimmick, who cares? The hilarious part is people aren't trying to call themselves AI artists. They're calling themselves "prompt engineers". Because even they though the former has no value ( or won't soon ) while the latter does.
You are not correct tho, at least about people "not calling themselves AI artists" IT is a thing that happens. the rest of your post can be also applied to most people doing basic tasks - most of their work can be replaced, however, human imput is still important. As if you forbidden AI to copy - pretty much steal preexistent artworks it would not exist. Some day no people will be needed to work, most of us will be replacable and not just artists
@@tauriietauriie6009 well I'm designing the algorithms so I'll be the last to go, but it'll become a moot point whether or not something is 'real' or not. I know plenty of artists who are happy about having ai in their workflow, so I think this will become another tool in the artists' arsenal, and will allow more people to create cool stuff.
I DON'T GET IT, WHY ARE ALL THE TRANS MEN SO GOOD AT ART WHAT ARE YOUR SECRETS? THIS IS A RECURRING PHENOMENON THAT HAS HAPPENED TO MANY TIMES TO COUNT
It depends on what you mean. To put I the right prompt to get what you want and then editing, meshing, and upscaling that image a ton could technically be an art.
But just because you made something beautiful does not make you an artist. Many people using AI, even some that I know do not know anything about art principles, heck, I even made one prompt writing some random bullshit, I upscaled it and IT looked wonderful - that's because it takes preexistent art that DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU and mixes it together making something good with you not even moving a finger. You don"t even have to choose the pictures you want to mix, AI does it for you, it steals so hard from actual artists that sometimes you can find mutulated watermarks and signatures so nah I do not agree with you
Nah, I disagree. Watch Challa, BoroCG or other artists points that explain pretty well why AI is at least for now okay and can become even a tool for artists. Also, we do have art collages and cut outs and these suddenly ARE CONSIDERED ART, and not STEALING, wow, what a surprise 🙄 Noobs using AI and bragging about it is another topic, but sorry, most times to get something really brilliant you have to know how which AI works and how to use different tags, how to explore on keywords and operate them in which way and also have to know basics of composition and stuff like that - which is artsy. So bare minimum of work is required to create some expressive and shocking AI COLLAGE. But it's only my opinion ;)
I have watched Challa's video, however the difference between a collage and AI is that "surprise" (with rolling eyes emoji) the person writing the keybords do not choose the images merged by AI themselves. They choose the words and then click on the picture they like the most - in this sense they AI still does all of the work for you so comparing it to collages is not exactly the same. Sure AI can be used by artists, but your point about this deep understanding of composition and other art principles is semi true. I tried AI softwares with friends and even the ones with no knowledge at all were able to create something better than they ever would with their hands alone
@@tauriietauriie6009 Actually it's up to a person that uses AI. There are bots that feature photo bashes with your own photos and you can choose whichever version you like. Also most times the chosen style or quality changes elements that AI bashed, so that it isn't close to original. When it comes to style - also many artists take someone else's art style and use it for their own profit - should they be called artists if they do such terrible thing? As for noobs - pieces may seem awesome and stuff, but if it was about more complex composition AI wouldn't generate that in desired way. AI is another tool that is to be perfected so I believe that after some more sittings with AI, the pieces that came out by your friends' output - if they had to redo it for second time - would be much better as they got to know mechanics. You can't say that this isn't learning and working. (Same with painting using Photoshop and pre-made -by someone else oh my, brushes and textures). AI for sure will be exploited, such as there always will be art thieves and tracers, etc., amongst this wild community and probably these issues will never be solved. Of course we should raise this problem and enlighten people around us, but otherwise there's no use crying over spilled milk. Let's be the avant-garde that again will change the way world looks in face of modern technologies ;)
Man the more computers progress the more I start to think it was a mistake to invent them. Like this is a little bit doomer of me, but if I had the chance to take a wormhole to a world where computers were never invented I would do it in a heartbeat, wouldn't even think about it. I know there are lots of things they do that are useful, but none of it is worth what it cost us, it could have been something that turned out good for people but it didn't.
I didn't realize people were were claiming to be "AI artists" I have been part of the artist community as a consumer, not an artist, but I still have seen many times the amount of effort that goes into art, it still amazes me. Even though I like AI art, I don't like people like that saying they are artists. Claiming to be an AI artist is just a funny way of saying "Thought up a few ideas and clicked a button until something cool came out." Actual artists, not just traditional artists, takes so much more time and effort.
AI art is still cool tho, just not those people
I fully agree, I think that AI art can be pretty dope but just the fact that some people brag about winning in competitions with it and them saying how much effort it took them to make it... feels kinda crushing ngl
seriously wtf
What if they use ai arts as a medium for them to draw on them. For an example, they use an ai to create a drawing and put it on a canvas. Then they draw the blank part of the canvas with whatever creativity they have. Is that count as ai art?
@@misterdaydream964 yeah thats making art, that'd be pretty similar to using a photo, stock image or another drawing as a background to draw on. You're still actually adding something to the piece and creating something new, totally different from just typing a few words in and having an AI do it all.
I'm worried for the future of artists
I'm worried for the future of everyone. Two years ago one guy at the party wouldn't believe me when I told him that AI will be able to create art, for him it sounded insane, as if humans could be replaced even at creativity and technically... Yeah. If we can be replaced even when it comes to creative tasks : basic ones will be replaced just as efficiently, it looks pretty bad on us lmao
Yeah
If you're the one who developed the AI that can make a great piece of art, you deserve to be proud. But if you just the user and brag about it that's kinda lame
If you're the one who made the brush and mixed the paint that can make a great piece of art, you deserve to be proud. But if you're just the user and brag about it that's kinda lame.
Point being: Merely wielding a brush doesn't make you an artist, and mere wielding of AI tools doesn't, either. You can't tell whether someone's an artist by what medium they're using but by how they're using it: Writing a prompt and getting a result that will be artistically interesting are two quite different things, absolute hacks will often produce absolute garbage with bad colours, bad composition, bad themes, bad everything using either AI tools or brushes. Salty that AI artists can't wield a brush or have an intimate knowledge of colour perception and its tripfalls and still get good results? Well, so do 3d artists. A painted image of just a wine glass with all the right caustics is certainly more impressive from the craft POV than a rendered one -- but, ultimately, that's craft value, not artistic. It's still a simple wine glass from that perspective, the additional craft value doesn't elevate its meaning.
@@aoeuable jeez wtf 😂 chill dude
@@aoeuable the process of making art is completely different from that of AI art making. One solely requires prompts while the other requires a physical(like moving your hand around the piece) process of painting or sculpting, even in digital media.
Before you say photography, it's still a physical process, not just clicking a button(as some critics may say). It's about finding the correct angle, lighting, composition and more, most of which must be manipulated by the photographer before making a shot.
I don't hate AI art. I respect the process, and I like the art. However, I hate when AI "artists" refer to themselves as such, when they're only creating prompts and leaving most of the handiwork to AI.
@@aoeuable found the AI "artist"
@@Lucien_M If you don't understand composition, lightning, and more you also won't get good results out of AI tools, that's my very point. To get good results out of AI you need to either do *very* lengthy prompt massaging, massage things afterwards using ordinary 2d graphics programs, or both.
And, just for the record, no, I'm not an AI artist. I'm a programmer with enough Blender chops to get something out there that doesn't completely suck. Maybe the difference is that I know how those tools work and how much *not* magic and not intelligent they are, When AIs ever become good enough to replace actual artists they'll form a union and insist on proper payment, we're absolutely not there yet.
claiming that ai art is something you made is like claiming that you made a piece that you commissioned from someone
Hand man punch 👍
My art is too shit to fight back with
I like and use AI art because they're cool
They use AI art because they can't draw
We are not the same.
Yeah, that hurts ;-;
So true. I saw at some Discord server, where random guy shared AI images and told something like "Omg, i added to AI Linkin Park's song lyrics and it created beautiful images! I did amazing job!!11" and other people was like "Omg, you're amazing artist!" Like... whyyy????
Broo so dumb, especially since this person didn"t even make the lyrics they used
AI should take over some planing stuff so people have more time to create art. Not otherwise!
Also imagine calling yourself a writer after browsering around and just coping some chapters of other people books/fanficts/works and editing it a little bit.
I think there can be some artistic merit to it but it’s a completely different category and should not win competitions where people actually created pieces by hand.
wait, there are actually people calling themselves AI artists?
Damn just seen some tweet lately said "ai art prompting is so hard" is such a load of shit
did you make that charater to show how good you can draw hand?.. cause if so... good on you.
it isnt how good it looks, its the creators effort and emotion that makes it art, its certainly an amazing achievement for computer technology but its not an atwark in my eyes
FINALLY
ai “artists” don’t do as much work as legit artists do
plus ai art might not give you the results you want
Yeah, absolutely, to think that some people believe that the effor is in any way equal is a clownery
@@tauriietauriie6009 Yeah.
Sure, AI art may look cool sometimes but it probably doesn’t have as much of the expression and effort you’d get from human art. Plus you might want something in someone else’s artstyle, the artstyle of a person.
Just commission a human artist if you want art. Actual work’s put behind it and it also helps to support an artist that may be starving and living solely off of instant ramen.
-Plus if you want something more specific like the Singularity from Dead by Daylight in a Skull Merchant themed costume with the colour scheme of the Dredge, AI art will not give you what you want.-
Sometimes I’ll use it to make like a forest background from some images for real art but anymore than that’s too far
AI "artists", more like AI farmers if you ask me
I love triggering art majors
I haven't even studied art, you sound annoying not triggering xD
I will say as an both an artists and designer as well an enthusiast of the medium/hobby it really frustrates me to hear how people keep saying AI won't take over artist or groahic deisigner jobs.
Seeing how easy it it is to produce work that even if it steals previously existent work. It's so dam effecient for people that just want to make a quick but with putting ZERO effort into the work.
I wish more people pointed out the need and wish of being part of this group of "artists" or have that title
There's so much obsession with language and words when it comes to art, artists, or animations.
It's this need to not be excluded that to me looks toxic and cultish. Along with this "community" (Half of the artists don't say they are in a community though I guess, so that's good)
Here's the thing. Would you be happy if instead of being called an AI Artist, you would be called something else that's accurate and not demeaning? I bet most wouldn't, I would actually bet money on it. There's also no universe where you would not be excluded or looked down upon by artists if this was the case.
People are obsessed with getting that title of AI Artist (or discouraging it). It's just very flawed and I feel like the only solution is being the louder voice and making sure what YOU believe goes through (not what's right or what isn't). In another world, they have no motivation to be called an artist, I could give a realistic solution, like just giving them another word that still says that what they posted is cool. In this world, you have to change language and history entirely.
Edit: I guess not everyone is obsessed, some are just ignorant. Everyone who defends the term "AI Artist" must be obsessed or feel attacked though.
Unrelated:
I really like artists that don't say they are in a community, or at least the ones I haven't seen them say it because they don't say it multiple times a week.
I also like artists that don't interact too much on social media because that makes it easier to find art, and also many of those don't enjoy sending the ocassional hate mobs with no remorse
Searching a picture of what you desire in a browser doesn't make someone an artist, I feel like.
@@cinder_ -completely unrelated to my comment I think-
You misunderstand my comment because that's not something I had ever stated
@@cinder_ My comment tries to portray the motivation for these people to call themselves an artist, and point out a problem that involves anyone that has something to do with art (not just artists, but people that enjoy art)
It also explains how the "artist community" is toxic and how they are the cause of motivating people to get the title of "an artist" one way or another
@@EgoistTheMoon I was describing what "AI artist" does, and how it doesn't make them an artist.
me, an artist whos been studying and practicing for about a decade now. vs my brother who.. eeugh
yeah i agree with this
I think that both ai artists and "old-school" artists deserve a lot of respect. After all, creativity is what matters. I imagine it was a similar thing back in the day when digital art was getting started.
Nah at least when digital art got started people were still actually creating their art.
Damn, putting actual work to create what you envision is now considered old school.
It wasn't similar, you still need skill to draw using digitalize items like brushes and pens for digital art but if you're gonna tell me that typing keywords and phrases for a computer generated pictures made up of thousands of stolen legit artworks is also considered as 'art'. Then, might as well make a kolaj by hand. Atleast you made an effort in doing kolaj.
digital art programs are literally just a combination of mimicking existing traditional tools dumped into a computer program. Every stroke is done by the artist themselves. The hate digital art got was uncalled for due to this specific reason. You're still the one doing the art, not the computer. Having pixels stained with colour vs paper granules being stained have no basic difference aside from one being physical and the other virtual. As someone who does both digital and traditional art, this argument makes me so mad.
If someone makes a beautiful piano piece on a computer instead of playing a physical piano do they deserve no credit? it still takes some level of imagination and creativity + time to craft the perfect image after a thousand failed attempts
If people have their own unique style with an AI that they become recognised for I think theyre an artist.
I literally make digital art. I made IT on the computer and I can assure you this is not the same.
It sounds interesting but I haven't found yet anyone who would have fully THEIR recognizable "ai artstyle" since it's all a mashup of stolen art.
@@tauriietauriie6009 Steal from one person that's plagiarism, steal from many that is research and inspiration, that is art, nothing is ever truly original but building on what's come before
New simpler art styles probably since classical antiquity have been scoffed at because theyre "easier to do" and takes less technical skill, yes this now takes zero practical skill but I do think a new generation of interesting stuff will develop from it
I do think its pretentious for someone to call themselves an "ai artist" but I also think its a little pretentious to think someone couldnt become an interesting artist that expresses themselves through ai
In conclusion, idk.
Artists trying so hard to protect a title that's going to be pretty much worthless soon. Who cares about an artist that can make something in a week or day when everyone else can do it in secs? It's like those hyperreal painters that can produce images that look like they were taken with a camera. Outside the 2 min gimmick, who cares?
The hilarious part is people aren't trying to call themselves AI artists. They're calling themselves "prompt engineers". Because even they though the former has no value ( or won't soon ) while the latter does.
You are not correct tho, at least about people "not calling themselves AI artists" IT is a thing that happens. the rest of your post can be also applied to most people doing basic tasks - most of their work can be replaced, however, human imput is still important. As if you forbidden AI to copy - pretty much steal preexistent artworks it would not exist. Some day no people will be needed to work, most of us will be replacable and not just artists
Yeah... but I mean... they kind of can replace "real" artists can't they...
Tehnically? Yeah, but as soon as they do every other job will be on a very thin line. Artysts will be replacable and so will you, what's your point?
@@tauriietauriie6009 well I'm designing the algorithms so I'll be the last to go, but it'll become a moot point whether or not something is 'real' or not. I know plenty of artists who are happy about having ai in their workflow, so I think this will become another tool in the artists' arsenal, and will allow more people to create cool stuff.
0:23 Is that a punch or a headbutt?
@Desk Fan somehow that encapsulates everything and nothing of what happened
I DON'T GET IT, WHY ARE ALL THE TRANS MEN SO GOOD AT ART
WHAT ARE YOUR SECRETS?
THIS IS A RECURRING PHENOMENON THAT HAS HAPPENED TO MANY TIMES TO COUNT
It depends on what you mean. To put I the right prompt to get what you want and then editing, meshing, and upscaling that image a ton could technically be an art.
But just because you made something beautiful does not make you an artist. Many people using AI, even some that I know do not know anything about art principles, heck, I even made one prompt writing some random bullshit, I upscaled it and IT looked wonderful - that's because it takes preexistent art that DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU and mixes it together making something good with you not even moving a finger. You don"t even have to choose the pictures you want to mix, AI does it for you, it steals so hard from actual artists that sometimes you can find mutulated watermarks and signatures so nah I do not agree with you
AYO!?!? Colorado we are better than that come on... >:(
Exact same energy as the people that said hip hop wasn't art because of sampling
Nah, I disagree. Watch Challa, BoroCG or other artists points that explain pretty well why AI is at least for now okay and can become even a tool for artists. Also, we do have art collages and cut outs and these suddenly ARE CONSIDERED ART, and not STEALING, wow, what a surprise 🙄
Noobs using AI and bragging about it is another topic, but sorry, most times to get something really brilliant you have to know how which AI works and how to use different tags, how to explore on keywords and operate them in which way and also have to know basics of composition and stuff like that - which is artsy. So bare minimum of work is required to create some expressive and shocking AI COLLAGE. But it's only my opinion ;)
I have watched Challa's video, however the difference between a collage and AI is that "surprise" (with rolling eyes emoji) the person writing the keybords do not choose the images merged by AI themselves. They choose the words and then click on the picture they like the most - in this sense they AI still does all of the work for you so comparing it to collages is not exactly the same. Sure AI can be used by artists, but your point about this deep understanding of composition and other art principles is semi true. I tried AI softwares with friends and even the ones with no knowledge at all were able to create something better than they ever would with their hands alone
@@tauriietauriie6009 Actually it's up to a person that uses AI. There are bots that feature photo bashes with your own photos and you can choose whichever version you like. Also most times the chosen style or quality changes elements that AI bashed, so that it isn't close to original. When it comes to style - also many artists take someone else's art style and use it for their own profit - should they be called artists if they do such terrible thing?
As for noobs - pieces may seem awesome and stuff, but if it was about more complex composition AI wouldn't generate that in desired way. AI is another tool that is to be perfected so I believe that after some more sittings with AI, the pieces that came out by your friends' output - if they had to redo it for second time - would be much better as they got to know mechanics. You can't say that this isn't learning and working. (Same with painting using Photoshop and pre-made -by someone else oh my, brushes and textures).
AI for sure will be exploited, such as there always will be art thieves and tracers, etc., amongst this wild community and probably these issues will never be solved. Of course we should raise this problem and enlighten people around us, but otherwise there's no use crying over spilled milk. Let's be the avant-garde that again will change the way world looks in face of modern technologies ;)
Malding:) First it was the workers, soon it'll be the artist:*
COPE (just make good art)
Do you realise how dumb this statement is? Do I cope? Yeah, that's a part of becoming a better person, also I do make some good art thanks lol
@@tauriietauriie6009 cope and seethe LOL
@@DagothUr3672 you too xD
Man the more computers progress the more I start to think it was a mistake to invent them. Like this is a little bit doomer of me, but if I had the chance to take a wormhole to a world where computers were never invented I would do it in a heartbeat, wouldn't even think about it. I know there are lots of things they do that are useful, but none of it is worth what it cost us, it could have been something that turned out good for people but it didn't.
Well, what about computers is bad?
god i hate ai artists with a passion. any ai art program in general ive come to dislike tbh. it was cool at first but now its just upsetting