Cooking sprays consist of approximately 90% by weight oil less all the additives. So an accurate picture would be to take 90% of the weight. Plus you need to take in to account losses left on the pan, unless you sit there and lick the pan. That is why for most people, it is best left untracked, unless you are using a large amount. Be consistent and light on the spray, and there is no need to track it
How do you accurately calculate your TDEE? Some days I have work, some days I don't, sometimes I do cardio walking 10 minutes to gym, some it doesn't, and don't even get me started on going grocery shopping. Is there anyway to easily accurately get a number, without calculating it every single day?
what about the weight of the compressed gas in the aerosol can berto? surely some of the grams of weight lost from the can are due to the compressed propellant in there.
when i make omelettes, i just lightly spray the pan for 3 squirts, that probably a gram of fat, but then i wipe the pan with a paper towel to get a lot of the excess fat off... it still lubricates but i doubt there is much fat so I don't track it. you think this would work?
Yeah, with everything else you have to know the composition in order to know how much of each nutrient you get. With uncooked rice its around 7p, 78cho, 0,6fat, which I know by heart already :)
All sprays are LABELED as 0 calories but you have to look at the serving size. You are basically spraying pure oil, which is just fat. So if you can measure how much you are spraying, then you can measure how much fat you're using.
thanks man. that's pretty convenient. i was confused because for everything else, the weight or volume doesn't really dictate how much nutrients there are. for example, 1 gram of rice doesn't mean 1 gram of carbs.
I've noticed the macros on the back of that brand of meats...they are WAY off..no lean top sirloin cut of meat has like 22g of fat per serving lolol. What do you use for macros for lean, trimmed, top sirloin beef with little to no visible marbling ?? It's certainly NOT 22g of fat shown on the label.
never tracked it before but now i know my overall calories could have been significantly higher from the sprays alone.. guess should count condiments too :/
lol what exactly do you think is in pam that comes out like oil, greases a pan like oil would, tastes like oil would, but doesn't have the fat content of oil? you should read the label more closely...
not sure if srs... so 1/3 of a second's worth is probably 4.5 calories, say. that's .5 grams of fat, even though it says 0 on the label. so 1 full second = 1.5 grams and 2 seconds = 3 grams = 27 calories.
it's the same reason why you wouldn't use the calorie burn number on a cardio machine to accurately measure how many calories you burned, unless you have lab grade equipment to hook up to yourself, the number won't be accurate. tracking your weight loss/gain on a scale as a running average (say, weekly) and being precise with your nutrition is inclusive of your caloric expenditure.
only tracking some things defeats the whole point of tracking. the point is to be accurate, if you don't care to be accurate, you shouldn't track. and by the way in the video example it was 9 grams of fat = 81 calories. that's significant.
Sometime I wonder if there is any point in being that precise with macros. If you going to do that why done you also measure every activity you do throughout that day to determine your daily energy spenditure as well if it really matters that much. If you have to make a trip to go grocery shopping and walk around the store for an hour add the calories used to your daily goal. You can always be right on, I think it would be very very hard.
They laughed when I told them I was going to build muscle with "Max Muscle Extend", but then I showed them the results. Do a search on Google for Max Muscle Extend to see their reaction. (You should see their faces!)
you don't lose fat when cooking, you lose water. weigh everything out raw and calculate your macros, the weight lost from cooking will be water i.e. no change in nutrition
but it's not like you wipe every drop off the tray so wouldn't you have to take that into account.... it sounds like over doing it but if your gonna be that strict in the first place
'calorie free' gum is about 2 grams of carbs a piece. if you eat a whole pack (say, 10 pieces) thats 20 grams of carbs = 80 calories that you didn't account for. you may want to think about things before you just say them.
My point was not you that you couldn't live a balanced life while tracking literally everything you consume, but rather at a certain point the benefits of tracking something as minute as cooking spray are so marginal it's not worth doing. Although you mentioned people ask this for contest prep, what percentage of people watching this video do you think compete? I would bet its pretty small.
Hold up...Firstly who is my target audience? Wait until the 30 second mark and you will see. I would bet the six beers I have in my fridge for later today that I micro-manage everything less yourself, and that the majority of my athletes that I coach do the same. We strive to promote effectiveness, and balance....and yes you can be a hyperfocused athlete and yet maintain balance. I firmly believe so...
It's one and the same thing man, you call it oil when it's fluid and fat when it's solid, but nutritionwise, it's all fat, and if it weighs 9 gram, yeah that is 9 gram of fat.
I like a lot of your videos, but you guys seriously micro manage everything to the extreme. Next 3DMJ video- tracking macros for calorie free gum, every 50th piece you eat is .001g's of fat.
![CENTRAL CEE - GEN Z LUV [VERTICAL VIDEO]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VIbidJm9q34/mqdefault.jpg)
i always though 0 calores plus 0 calories equaled zero
such a great tip! defs handy tip I will forever remember in the future. cheers for sharing nunez!
damn dude. you're on the next level! im dependent on reading the labels or myfitnesspal
So simple, yet so smart.
Cooking sprays consist of approximately 90% by weight oil less all the additives. So an accurate picture would be to take 90% of the weight. Plus you need to take in to account losses left on the pan, unless you sit there and lick the pan. That is why for most people, it is best left untracked, unless you are using a large amount. Be consistent and light on the spray, and there is no need to track it
570x2 deadlift, awesome!
Liking the shirt man... big Russian River fan in Santa Rosa here!
Read the label...Its 0 calories for a spray that last a fraction of a second. Virtually no practical use a spray that last 1/3 of second.
How do you accurately calculate your TDEE? Some days I have work, some days I don't, sometimes I do cardio walking 10 minutes to gym, some it doesn't, and don't even get me started on going grocery shopping. Is there anyway to easily accurately get a number, without calculating it every single day?
what about the weight of the compressed gas in the aerosol can berto?
surely some of the grams of weight lost from the can are due to the compressed propellant in there.
when i make omelettes, i just lightly spray the pan for 3 squirts, that probably a gram of fat, but then i wipe the pan with a paper towel to get a lot of the excess fat off... it still lubricates but i doubt there is much fat so I don't track it.
you think this would work?
How do you account for the fat left in the pan? Do you just estimate?
How do you accurately track meat products after they have been cooked?
Yeah, with everything else you have to know the composition in order to know how much of each nutrient you get. With uncooked rice its around 7p, 78cho, 0,6fat, which I know by heart already :)
All sprays are LABELED as 0 calories but you have to look at the serving size.
You are basically spraying pure oil, which is just fat. So if you can measure how much you are spraying, then you can measure how much fat you're using.
What if the serving is in mL?
some scalles haveproblems with objects that are bigger then the scale it self. just being able to read the weight will give trouble.
thanks man. that's pretty convenient. i was confused because for everything else, the weight or volume doesn't really dictate how much nutrients there are.
for example, 1 gram of rice doesn't mean 1 gram of carbs.
Hey I just got some of the spray yesterday!
What kind of scale is that, and wat do you recommend?
What scale is that? :)
those alexia sweet potato fries are fucking amazing
does a lot of the fat get lost in the cooking process?
I've noticed the macros on the back of that brand of meats...they are WAY off..no lean top sirloin cut of meat has like 22g of fat per serving lolol. What do you use for macros for lean, trimmed, top sirloin beef with little to no visible marbling ?? It's certainly NOT 22g of fat shown on the label.
coconut oil spray! good choice Berto
never tracked it before but now i know my overall calories could have been significantly higher from the sprays alone.. guess should count condiments too :/
Intermediate fasting? Is that the level you unlock after you beat it on easy?
Thought you had to use alot more to have any calories
I do...and I never track it and it's never impeded on my fat loss
lol what exactly do you think is in pam that comes out like oil, greases a pan like oil would, tastes like oil would, but doesn't have the fat content of oil?
you should read the label more closely...
not sure if srs... so 1/3 of a second's worth is probably 4.5 calories, say. that's .5 grams of fat, even though it says 0 on the label. so 1 full second = 1.5 grams and 2 seconds = 3 grams = 27 calories.
it's the same reason why you wouldn't use the calorie burn number on a cardio machine to accurately measure how many calories you burned, unless you have lab grade equipment to hook up to yourself, the number won't be accurate.
tracking your weight loss/gain on a scale as a running average (say, weekly) and being precise with your nutrition is inclusive of your caloric expenditure.
i did laugh at the scale
@Team3DMJ, any response?
only tracking some things defeats the whole point of tracking. the point is to be accurate, if you don't care to be accurate, you shouldn't track. and by the way in the video example it was 9 grams of fat = 81 calories. that's significant.
he doesnt count his TDEE daily, just keep tracking your macros and adjust as you see fit weekly or bi weekly
Sometime I wonder if there is any point in being that precise with macros. If you going to do that why done you also measure every activity you do throughout that day to determine your daily energy spenditure as well if it really matters that much. If you have to make a trip to go grocery shopping and walk around the store for an hour add the calories used to your daily goal. You can always be right on, I think it would be very very hard.
damn i have just been ignoring recording the spray.
They laughed when I told them I was going to build muscle with "Max Muscle Extend", but then I showed them the results. Do a search on Google for Max Muscle Extend to see their reaction. (You should see their faces!)
you don't lose fat when cooking, you lose water. weigh everything out raw and calculate your macros, the weight lost from cooking will be water i.e. no change in nutrition
This does not factor in weight of the propellant and the amount that is left on the pan when the food is served. Def hard to track perfectly!
but it's not like you wipe every drop off the tray so wouldn't you have to take that into account.... it sounds like over doing it but if your gonna be that strict in the first place
Pliny the younger!
i just pour out 2 grams of oil on my skillet n use a brush to get it all oily
'calorie free' gum is about 2 grams of carbs a piece. if you eat a whole pack (say, 10 pieces) thats 20 grams of carbs = 80 calories that you didn't account for.
you may want to think about things before you just say them.
Was gonna say its not worth tracking but if you use that much everything it would be l
i hope you pepper your angus berto!
fuck why didn't i think of this
the spray would not be pure fat, contains propellants n shiz
My scale will not tell me how many grams of fat
My point was not you that you couldn't live a balanced life while tracking literally everything you consume, but rather at a certain point the benefits of tracking something as minute as cooking spray are so marginal it's not worth doing. Although you mentioned people ask this for contest prep, what percentage of people watching this video do you think compete? I would bet its pretty small.
whoa whoa whoa. 9 grams of oil (weight) or 9 grams of actual fat (nutrient)?
Hold up...Firstly who is my target audience? Wait until the 30 second mark and you will see. I would bet the six beers I have in my fridge for later today that I micro-manage everything less yourself, and that the majority of my athletes that I coach do the same. We strive to promote effectiveness, and balance....and yes you can be a hyperfocused athlete and yet maintain balance. I firmly believe so...
No, my point is some of these videos are superfluous and probably do more harm than good to people into lifting.
It's one and the same thing man, you call it oil when it's fluid and fat when it's solid, but nutritionwise, it's all fat, and if it weighs 9 gram, yeah that is 9 gram of fat.
what planet do you live on where oil is different from fat?
or you could just put the tray on the scales. just sayin
No, fat wont evaporate like water does in the cooking process.
I like a lot of your videos, but you guys seriously micro manage everything to the extreme. Next 3DMJ video- tracking macros for calorie free gum, every 50th piece you eat is .001g's of fat.
This video did not teach at all how to track the sprays u didn't explain it
gum isn't calorie free, its 1-2g carbs per piece, so your logic is wrong
does a lot of the fat get lost in the cooking process?