nah just buy one of them for short trips and small fields then buy a global 7500 or gulfstream for the long flights but thats a discussion for another video
Pilatus obtained certification for take-offs and landings on grass, wet earth and snow, making the PC-24 the world’s most flexible business jet ever. So its worth cost more than phenom 300
*2 very different jets, the PC-24 is more versatile, better cabin layout, and can access way more runways. The Phenom is faster and more amenity driven. Me? My money is in the Pilatus, no question.*
From a pilot's perspective the Phenom 300 is a much nicer and better aircraft! I had both ratings, Phenom and PC24. The avionic on the Phenom is so much better, especially for single pilot operations!
@@Hans_Magnusson Garmin Avionics is made for kids and very intuitive, you don't have to spend time to get comfortable with the logic, as you do on pc24 avionics. It's just as simple as iphone.
@@omigo1708 I would say the Garmin is only intuitive if you're not already familiar with Honeywell or Collins packages. There are a number of nice things the Garmin can do, but it is a very limited package.
It isn't like BMW versus Mercedes Bens. It is like a BMW X5 versus 5 series. The PC 24 has a cargo door large enough for a pallet and can take-off and land on unimproved runways (e.g. dirt). The other jet doesn't have a pallet-sized cargo door nor take-off and land on unimproved runways.
Thanks for this video. PC24 is built in far superior quality than 300E, however after sales service especially in Asia is poor hence PC24 is loosing out many customers to 300E. The upcoming Honda Jet 2600 will be game changer though.
Not mentioned here, the PC-24 also has a full externally-serviceable bathroom instead of a honey pot which is brilliantly located where the door closes. A fantastically efficient use of space and much less awkward to use than the Phenom's.
The Phenom 300/300E offer an externally serviced lav, but the PC 24 features an externally serviced lave with a vacuum toilet, which no other light jet offers.
I would have enjoyed a side by side specifications comparison chart. Apart from the VERY awkward lav, I favor the PC-24 for its overall craftsmanship and that Swiss engineering excellence.
i dont understand the people that would choose a phenom 300 over the pc24. The pc24 has a wider, taller, and longer cabin, with an 8 seat configuration (6 seat configuration max on the phenom), huge cargo space accessible during flight, with more runway options, and flying at the same speed with the same range, just because the phenom "looks better" and has a nicer bathroom that youll never use. Not to mention, that the pc24 looks better in my opinion
Lol really? yes it was designed from the ground up to be single pilot and is the best light jet for single pilot on the market. Single pilot is one of the main selling features of the plane and headlined on the website for it.
Embraer´s quality and attention to detail is absolutely astonishing. Highly engineered planes as you do not see anywhere else among the competitors. Not even close.
People here are talking about how bad the music is and her voice is to high or whatever... But I think she did a wonderful job and narrated beautifully.
Most people are not going to buy based on lavatory. The Pilatus can land at thousands more airports than the 300 can. Not to mention that cargo door means you can load much larger items in the back. And QPM means you can run certain aircraft systems without ground power or putting TBO hours on the engines. As a pilot I'll take the PC-24 over the 300 any day of the year.
Love them both but phenom suits my mission profile better but the idea of having a jet with field performance and a door big enough to put my dirt bike in is pretty awesome but having flown on both phenom has fantastic short field performance and way better bathroom and speed and economy advantage that make it much better for my business
thats how you know you dont have a jet. Youll never use the bathroom becuase its $200 to suck out the pee everytime you use it, and on the pc24 you have more space to convert the cabin into a 8 seat configutation unlike the phenom, because the pc24 has a wider, taller, and longer cabin with flat floors
Unpopular opinions: The Phenom is basically a Yugo. Armrests and cockpit side panels constantly fall off. You bump into them, they fall off. Trim panels underneath the seats end up randomly dispersed in the plane after passengers kick them off. They are essentially held on with velcro.The sunken aisleway is a wonderful way to break/strain an ankle. As someone mentioned previously, the avionics is suitable for beginners, not professionals (show me how to easily input a crossing restriction abeam a point not directly on the active leg). Braking! I've never seen brakes that worked so randomly in any aircraft I've flown before, even other Embraer products. Until the E model, the Phenom was unremarkably slow, clumsy and had unharmonious controls. I dont understand the logic behind mounting the controls so high and as you pull aft, they go higher. I do recognize the plane fills a niche and is cost-effective to operate.
The versatility and STOL characteristics of the PC-24 are amazing. Unfortunately, being a fast jet with a huge cargo bay that can get in and out of short dirt/grass runways makes it a favorite of drug runners. Don’t ask me how I know that. Why are you showing photos of Cessna Citations as well as the Pilatus when speaking of the Phenom? Some video editing corrections are in order. Otherwise, good job!
I realize many of these 2 jets will be owner flown, but from a passenger perspective, the flat floor and QPM power mode of the 24 to run the a/c in Florida summers cooling the cabin for my arrival would be a big plus. The bathroom arrangement of the 24 is a negative for me.
I feel like you just read from each brochure for 11 mins. A "vs" video should have some comparisons and at the end at least give your opinion on which one you feel is the better option and why. BernieKuepfer makes a great contribution in the comments about the Phenom having much better avionics in regards to single pilot operations but an explanation in the video as to why the 300 tops that category would've been very helpful. The information in this video was above and beyond but keep in mind that most people searching out information comparing two similar products are looking for reasons why one is better than the other.
I’d have to say neither is better. The choice is based entirely on mission and priorities. Either is single pilot capable, though the Phenom avionics suite is more user friendly. But some operators need a jet that can operate from short and/or unimproved strips and be loaded with a forklift. These operators will be happy in the PC24. And anyone comparing these two should also be looking at the Cessna Citation CJ4.
The Phenom is a jet technologically much more modern and much cheaper than the PC24 ... I think this Swiss knife from the skies needs to be "sharpened" to compare with the Phenom...
Please lose the annoying music. I stopped the video at 1:38 because of it. If you insist, perhaps a really soft volume to make it easier to ignore. Thank you
So, I saw a citation jet during the Pilatus presentation, a Lear during the Phenom- then a Pilatus during the Phenom. And the narrator doesn't speak "pilot speak", which was annoying (Eff ELL 4 hundred and fifty...). Oh well, at least she sounded hot.
Pro-tip: When you read flight level values such as "FL450" from your script, this should be pronounced "Flight level four-five-zero" NOT "eff el four hundred fifty." It would make the narrator sound knowledgeable. Strongly encourage you to google the acronyms all around. Good content, otherwise.
Seems like An Embry Riddle U. grad, aftyer flying/training on 172 G1000, Diamond DA42/62 twin prop G1000, would feel very at home in Embraer Phenom 300E G3000 single pilot certified. Just sayin
The Phenom 300 E has the best performance, its fuel consumption is the lowest, it's the fastest and has the largest range on the market. Recently the FAA awarded Embraer for this achievement with the Phenon 300 E. If the FAA says this is the best... Sorry, Pilatus 🤷🏻♂️
But if you have a company with remote locations that require head office leaders to visit frequently, the Pilatus can take a pallet of supplies and land on dirt. That is what the Pilatus is for AND it still provides a very comfortable environment for the trip.
You know, its just 10 nm of difference in terms of range... 2000 nm for PC-24, 2010 nm for Phenom. It's nothing but bragging rights. And sure, Pilatus will cruise 24 knots slower. So what? That's a few minutes of difference in air time. Easily recouped by the fact you can land at smaller airports closer to your destination, cutting on ground travel time. Admittedly, long-range cruise speeds are superior with Embraer. 44 knots extra is a lot. Half an hour of difference on each 5 hour leg (or 5.5 hour leg with PC-24). But whether you choose to save half an hour, or get all the extra utility, that's a choice fully depending on your mission.
@@alexanderpodlecki5431 i can understand but with that great capacity to land in unpaved lanes "Pilatus will sell pc24 as coke in desert" can you imagine how many unpaved lanes there are in the world now that only one jet can land in?
@@alexanderpodlecki5431 Don't overexaggerate. It's better on the Phenom, but the door in the PC-24 does the job. It's good enough. If that's the price for access to all the luggage in-flight, that's a fair price.
I would never land my jet, which cost millions, on a dirt or grass runway. I prefer the Phenom 300E, wonderful decor, it really has a private jet style.
It's not a small difference. And you can buy a used Embraer for less than half a price. The Pilatus costs of ownership are much more than Embraer's. Economically the Embraer beats Pilatus without a chance. Pilatus's only advantage, which is versatility, is only needed in extreme cases. That is why the main customers of the aircraft are organizations like "Australian Flying Doctors" and such. And yet, this undoubtedly beautiful special operations jet will never supplant the king of versatility at this class, the King Air. Which is beating the living daylights out of the Pilatus economically wise. So if you don't need a faster than a turboprop air ambulance or special transport capable of operating at hard-to-reach places, then you'd just overpay a lot of money for the versatility and carrying capacity you do not need.
@@Vladdy89 In which world does that argument make sense? If you spend millions on an asset, you will also calculate its depreciation and resell value which, in the Pilatus case, reduces cost of ownership significantly. In times of next-to-no interest rates big time! With a good financing your cost of ownership of the Pilatus is half that of a King Air, which offsets the higher fuel cost to a break-even that is somewhere around 200 hours annual utilization, which is about average for an owner pilot. This logically also applies to the buyer of a used aircraft. For that you get 30-70% higher cruise speed, better climb performance and thus around 30+% shorter mission time on a typical 600nm mission plus 10-60% longer range, depending on the King Air model. . Nothing said about better cabin comfort due to significantly lower noise levels....
I PREFER THE PHENOM 300E, BECAUSE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, IT FITS MY DIFFINTION OF TRUE QUALITY AND BEAUTY, I DON'T NEED THE EXTERA ROOM OR MORE RUNWAYS ACCESS THAT THE PC24 PROVIDS!!!
FYI the pilatuc pc 24 is going to absolutely kill the light jet market, because its a mid sized jet, with single pilot technology with a much shorter landing field, on top of that you get around the same price but a bigger jet, and same maintenance too. Usually it's more efficient with it's fuel burn as well. also I had the luck to be able to take a tour of the phenom 300, along with the pc 24. Though the pc 24 looks small, the thing is absolutely massive, you barley have to duck your head if your 5'10 furthermore, the phenom 300 is like a tomb, super narrow and small, while nice bathroom if you're gonna be 6'4 i wouldn't recommend
pilatus all the way, its so much better and holds so much more and for roughly the same price edit: alright so I also know this guy who got sold a phenom 300 that had a landing gear issue, and had to land on the runway without landing gear. Legally Embraer didn't have to tell him because they tested the plane before the aircraft was registered, which is kinda shady if you ask me. either way a private jet is like a penthouse on the 5,000th floor which means~~ I can't afford it :) also with the phenom 300 bbeing "longist range" maximum with only 1 passenger is 4 hours, compared from a 1 passenger pc 24 non stop from los angeles to new york city
I PREFER THE PHENOM 300E, BECAUSE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, IT FITS MY DIFFINTION OF TRUE QUALITY AND BEAUTY, I DON'T NEED THE EXTERA ROOM OR MORE RUNWAYS ACCESS THAT THE PC24 PROVIDS!!!
Yup, in any aircraft purchase, it starts and ends with mission. If you need a jet that can land on unimproved strips and that can be loaded with a forklift, the PC24 is for you. If you don’t need these and comfort and luxury are key, though the PC24 is no slouch, the Phenom 300E is your choice in this class. But you should also consider the Cessna Citation CJ4. Beyond these, you now require a second pilot. Me? Phenom 300E please.
Which private jet is your favorite? ✈✈✈
the Phenom 300E ist the best
@@joefloki804 i second this
Given my "skill" at landing my own plane, the Pilatus would last longer! Plus I like them, almost got a PC-12.
PC-24
24 of course ruclips.net/video/sZZaVskMWPE/видео.html
To have no doubts or regret, I will buy both.
Will that be cash or charge, sir ?
nah just buy one of them for short trips and small fields then buy a global 7500 or gulfstream for the long flights but thats a discussion for another video
@@mjr320 exactly. I have the same plan. One single pilot jet and a falcon 8x for best efficiency/low consumption and long travel
Pilatus obtained certification for take-offs and landings on grass, wet earth and snow, making the PC-24 the world’s most flexible business jet ever.
So its worth cost more than phenom 300
*2 very different jets, the PC-24 is more versatile, better cabin layout, and can access way more runways. The Phenom is faster and more amenity driven.
Me? My money is in the Pilatus, no question.*
Phenom 300 leading sales for 11 consecutive years. Speaks for itself.
From a pilot's perspective the Phenom 300 is a much nicer and better aircraft! I had both ratings, Phenom and PC24. The avionic on the Phenom is so much better, especially for single pilot operations!
@@Hans_Magnusson Garmin Avionics is made for kids and very intuitive, you don't have to spend time to get comfortable with the logic, as you do on pc24 avionics. It's just as simple as iphone.
@BernieKuepfer what would be the timeline to go from having never flown an aircraft before to being able to fly a Phenom 300 in single-pilot mode?
@@jalabi99 many many years
@@omigo1708 I would say the Garmin is only intuitive if you're not already familiar with Honeywell or Collins packages. There are a number of nice things the Garmin can do, but it is a very limited package.
@@jalabi99 Money would be the only real limitation.
It would have been nice if you provided a graphic on specifications of both planes: T/O roll, gph burned, cruise speed, range, baggage capacity etc.
It isn't like BMW versus Mercedes Bens. It is like a BMW X5 versus 5 series. The PC 24 has a cargo door large enough for a pallet and can take-off and land on unimproved runways (e.g. dirt). The other jet doesn't have a pallet-sized cargo door nor take-off and land on unimproved runways.
Thanks for this video. PC24 is built in far superior quality than 300E, however after sales service especially in Asia is poor hence PC24 is loosing out many customers to 300E. The upcoming Honda Jet 2600 will be game changer though.
Not mentioned here, the PC-24 also has a full externally-serviceable bathroom instead of a honey pot which is brilliantly located where the door closes. A fantastically efficient use of space and much less awkward to use than the Phenom's.
The Phenom 300/300E offer an externally serviced lav, but the PC 24 features an externally serviced lave with a vacuum toilet, which no other light jet offers.
And that's the big bonus. Vacuum toilets suck out the unpleasant odor.
The PC 24 is the Swiss knife of the skies!
I would have enjoyed a side by side specifications comparison chart. Apart from the VERY awkward lav, I favor the PC-24 for its overall craftsmanship and that Swiss engineering excellence.
I prefer the Pc-24, it's main problem is the lack of a true to purpose laboratory.
@@callangston9332 lavatory 😀.
@Biggus Dickus 😂😂😂
i dont understand the people that would choose a phenom 300 over the pc24. The pc24 has a wider, taller, and longer cabin, with an 8 seat configuration (6 seat configuration max on the phenom), huge cargo space accessible during flight, with more runway options, and flying at the same speed with the same range, just because the phenom "looks better" and has a nicer bathroom that youll never use. Not to mention, that the pc24 looks better in my opinion
Can the pc24 single pilot
Lol really? yes it was designed from the ground up to be single pilot and is the best light jet for single pilot on the market. Single pilot is one of the main selling features of the plane and headlined on the website for it.
Embraer´s quality and attention to detail is absolutely astonishing. Highly engineered planes as you do not see anywhere else among the competitors. Not even close.
It speaks volumes for the PC-24 when the Royal Australian Flying Doctors have endorsed the product having had the PC-12 in service .
Both are awesome , it just depends on what you need your plane to do.
No other business jet in the world is like an Embraer.
The pc24 is a very nice plane tho
Except a Pilatus lol
I take the PC24, please. A jet that you can land and take off from grass strips, priceless.
I agree!
People here are talking about how bad the music is and her voice is to high or whatever... But I think she did a wonderful job and narrated beautifully.
Thanks for the support and feedback!
PC 12 is the clear winner here.
Check out the lavatory and you will buy the Embrarer for sure.
Most people are not going to buy based on lavatory. The Pilatus can land at thousands more airports than the 300 can. Not to mention that cargo door means you can load much larger items in the back. And QPM means you can run certain aircraft systems without ground power or putting TBO hours on the engines. As a pilot I'll take the PC-24 over the 300 any day of the year.
Love them both but phenom suits my mission profile better but the idea of having a jet with field performance and a door big enough to put my dirt bike in is pretty awesome but having flown on both phenom has fantastic short field performance and way better bathroom and speed and economy advantage that make it much better for my business
thats how you know you dont have a jet. Youll never use the bathroom becuase its $200 to suck out the pee everytime you use it, and on the pc24 you have more space to convert the cabin into a 8 seat configutation unlike the phenom, because the pc24 has a wider, taller, and longer cabin with flat floors
@@Floag Have never chartered a jet wher the bathroom was not a must have never emptied on either
@@bingbang3318 the pc24 does have a bathroom though, it’s just in the front rather than the back
Unpopular opinions: The Phenom is basically a Yugo. Armrests and cockpit side panels constantly fall off. You bump into them, they fall off. Trim panels underneath the seats end up randomly dispersed in the plane after passengers kick them off. They are essentially held on with velcro.The sunken aisleway is a wonderful way to break/strain an ankle. As someone mentioned previously, the avionics is suitable for beginners, not professionals (show me how to easily input a crossing restriction abeam a point not directly on the active leg). Braking! I've never seen brakes that worked so randomly in any aircraft I've flown before, even other Embraer products. Until the E model, the Phenom was unremarkably slow, clumsy and had unharmonious controls. I dont understand the logic behind mounting the controls so high and as you pull aft, they go higher. I do recognize the plane fills a niche and is cost-effective to operate.
Custumers are stupid so (leader for 11 consecutivo years)
The versatility and STOL characteristics of the PC-24 are amazing. Unfortunately, being a fast jet with a huge cargo bay that can get in and out of short dirt/grass runways makes it a favorite of drug runners. Don’t ask me how I know that.
Why are you showing photos of Cessna Citations as well as the Pilatus when speaking of the Phenom? Some video editing corrections are in order. Otherwise, good job!
And the price comparison between the 2 aircraft ??
I realize many of these 2 jets will be owner flown, but from a passenger perspective, the flat floor and QPM power mode of the 24 to run the a/c in Florida summers cooling the cabin for my arrival would be a big plus. The bathroom arrangement of the 24 is a negative for me.
If I save a bit, I might be able to afford the pillows😅👍
@@Hans_Magnusson Thank you for your kind words. If they become reality, you have a special seat on my plane👍 Cheers🥂
@@bettigio if you do, give me a call
Оба самолёта весьма хороши:)... Спасибо за видео:).
PC24
I feel like you just read from each brochure for 11 mins. A "vs" video should have some comparisons and at the end at least give your opinion on which one you feel is the better option and why. BernieKuepfer makes a great contribution in the comments about the Phenom having much better avionics in regards to single pilot operations but an explanation in the video as to why the 300 tops that category would've been very helpful. The information in this video was above and beyond but keep in mind that most people searching out information comparing two similar products are looking for reasons why one is better than the other.
Thanks for the feedback, it's very helpful!
I’d have to say neither is better. The choice is based entirely on mission and priorities. Either is single pilot capable, though the Phenom avionics suite is more user friendly. But some operators need a jet that can operate from short and/or unimproved strips and be loaded with a forklift. These operators will be happy in the PC24. And anyone comparing these two should also be looking at the Cessna Citation CJ4.
Does the 300E have an AT? I know the PC24 has.
I believe the PC24 is still the only single-pilot certified jet which has auto-throttle.
Phenom 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
Something is wrong with the engine if it does BRBRBRBR.
pc 24 baby :))
The Phenom is a jet technologically much more modern and much cheaper than the PC24 ... I think this Swiss knife from the skies needs to be "sharpened" to compare with the Phenom...
The Phenom 300E The better Aircraft, very nice Avionics. . . .
Embraer a very good company to deal with.
Honda Jet!
Please lose the annoying music. I stopped the video at 1:38 because of it.
If you insist, perhaps a really soft volume to make it easier to ignore.
Thank you
Thanks for the feedback! Will take this into account.
PC24 the Best!
What is the (STOL?) maximum and/or minimum takeoff and landing in meters please?
the toilet of the PC-24 is only a joke !
If you buy a $11 million jet to take a shit, you really need to work on your priorities 😆.
@@CrispyOkra 😂😂😂😂😂👍👍👍
ລາຄາເທົາໃດ
ຈັກບອ່ນນັ່ງເຮັດຟ່າຍແນັນເທົ່າໃດ.ໃ
So, I saw a citation jet during the Pilatus presentation, a Lear during the Phenom- then a Pilatus during the Phenom. And the narrator doesn't speak "pilot speak", which was annoying (Eff ELL 4 hundred and fifty...). Oh well, at least she sounded hot.
Phenom does FL 450 single pilot. Nuff said
So does the PC-24. And CJ4. Not sure what your point is.
Pro-tip: When you read flight level values such as "FL450" from your script, this should be pronounced "Flight level four-five-zero" NOT "eff el four hundred fifty." It would make the narrator sound knowledgeable. Strongly encourage you to google the acronyms all around. Good content, otherwise.
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it!
@Biggus Dickus He had a wife, you know....
i liked the pc24
Seems like An Embry Riddle U. grad, aftyer flying/training on 172 G1000, Diamond DA42/62 twin prop G1000, would feel very at home in Embraer Phenom 300E G3000 single pilot certified. Just sayin
CJ4?
The Phenom 300 E has the best performance, its fuel consumption is the lowest, it's the fastest and has the largest range on the market. Recently the FAA awarded Embraer for this achievement with the Phenon 300 E. If the FAA says this is the best... Sorry, Pilatus 🤷🏻♂️
But if you have a company with remote locations that require head office leaders to visit frequently, the Pilatus can take a pallet of supplies and land on dirt. That is what the Pilatus is for AND it still provides a very comfortable environment for the trip.
@@schnabel5347 Only if you're doing drug deals in the congo on a sketchy short dirt runaway.... 😂🤣😂
😅😅😅
You know, its just 10 nm of difference in terms of range... 2000 nm for PC-24, 2010 nm for Phenom. It's nothing but bragging rights.
And sure, Pilatus will cruise 24 knots slower. So what? That's a few minutes of difference in air time. Easily recouped by the fact you can land at smaller airports closer to your destination, cutting on ground travel time.
Admittedly, long-range cruise speeds are superior with Embraer. 44 knots extra is a lot. Half an hour of difference on each 5 hour leg (or 5.5 hour leg with PC-24). But whether you choose to save half an hour, or get all the extra utility, that's a choice fully depending on your mission.
Now nothing is comparable with Pilatus PC 24 , it is the most effective jet of the world.
Until you want to use the bathroom. On the Phenom is a private matter, on the Pilatus is a show for the other passengers....
@@alexanderpodlecki5431 i can understand but with that great capacity to land in unpaved lanes "Pilatus will sell pc24 as coke in desert" can you imagine how many unpaved lanes there are in the world now that only one jet can land in?
@@alexanderpodlecki5431 When you are a pilot owner you don't use the bathroom 😂😂😂
@@alexanderpodlecki5431 Don't overexaggerate. It's better on the Phenom, but the door in the PC-24 does the job. It's good enough.
If that's the price for access to all the luggage in-flight, that's a fair price.
Brasil!
I would never land my jet, which cost millions, on a dirt or grass runway.
I prefer the Phenom 300E, wonderful decor, it really has a private jet style.
The Phenom 300/300E also feature "real" light jet legroom, as opposed to the Pilatus PC 24, which offers legroom more akin to a midsize jet.
Off course Pilatus if the price is not a big difference
It's not a small difference. And you can buy a used Embraer for less than half a price. The Pilatus costs of ownership are much more than Embraer's. Economically the Embraer beats Pilatus without a chance. Pilatus's only advantage, which is versatility, is only needed in extreme cases. That is why the main customers of the aircraft are organizations like "Australian Flying Doctors" and such. And yet, this undoubtedly beautiful special operations jet will never supplant the king of versatility at this class, the King Air. Which is beating the living daylights out of the Pilatus economically wise. So if you don't need a faster than a turboprop air ambulance or special transport capable of operating at hard-to-reach places, then you'd just overpay a lot of money for the versatility and carrying capacity you do not need.
@@Vladdy89 In which world does that argument make sense? If you spend millions on an asset, you will also calculate its depreciation and resell value which, in the Pilatus case, reduces cost of ownership significantly. In times of next-to-no interest rates big time! With a good financing your cost of ownership of the Pilatus is half that of a King Air, which offsets the higher fuel cost to a break-even that is somewhere around 200 hours annual utilization, which is about average for an owner pilot. This logically also applies to the buyer of a used aircraft.
For that you get 30-70% higher cruise speed, better climb performance and thus around 30+% shorter mission time on a typical 600nm mission plus 10-60% longer range, depending on the King Air model. . Nothing said about better cabin comfort due to significantly lower noise levels....
The background music is very annoying.
Thanks for the feedback, we will take this into account for future videos.
Phenom 300E cost 9.5 million , PC-24 cost 12.5 million no more comments
The 300 E STARTS at $9.45mm most coming in around $10mm, The PC-24 is $10.2mm most coming in at $10.7.
@@gailmrutland6508 mm ? ???? ??????
@@ijaznadeem7269 million
I PREFER THE PHENOM 300E, BECAUSE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, IT FITS MY DIFFINTION OF TRUE QUALITY AND BEAUTY, I DON'T NEED THE EXTERA ROOM OR MORE RUNWAYS ACCESS THAT THE PC24 PROVIDS!!!
FYI the pilatuc pc 24 is going to absolutely kill the light jet market, because its a mid sized jet, with single pilot technology with a much shorter landing field, on top of that you get around the same price but a bigger jet, and same maintenance too. Usually it's more efficient with it's fuel burn as well.
also I had the luck to be able to take a tour of the phenom 300, along with the pc 24.
Though the pc 24 looks small, the thing is absolutely massive, you barley have to duck your head if your 5'10
furthermore, the phenom 300 is like a tomb, super narrow and small, while nice bathroom if you're gonna be 6'4 i wouldn't recommend
YOU DON'T HAVE TO YELL...LOL your cap lock was on :) ------just saying :)
VS. (LAT. VERSUS=TOWARDS) ISN'T AGAINST.THAT IS➡ADVERSUS, ADV.
Team PC24 tbh
pilatus all the way, its so much better and holds so much more and for roughly the same price
edit: alright so I also know this guy who got sold a phenom 300 that had a landing gear issue, and had to land on the runway without landing gear. Legally Embraer didn't have to tell him because they tested the plane before the aircraft was registered, which is kinda shady if you ask me.
either way a private jet is like a penthouse on the 5,000th floor
which means~~ I can't afford it :)
also with the phenom 300 bbeing "longist range" maximum with only 1 passenger is 4 hours, compared from a 1 passenger pc 24 non stop from los angeles to new york city
Phenom is the best ,there is a huge gap between then.
I can't hear that fast.
ຕອ້ງການຢາກຊື້ເຄຶ່ອງບີນລູ້ນນີ້
PHENOM 300E FO MEEEEE =D
🎉😮😊
L 5
Halim Talafuka,Alhamdulillahirobbil Alamiin,Allahumma Amiin.@$#
Because you think like a poor guy, if you are rich the airplane is a tool
Cringe when people do voiceovers and have absolutely no idea how to pronounce avaition words correctly.
That high school girl voice. ooofh
Put up a chart of the states next to each other. Landing distance, take off distance, fly time, fly distance, speed, etc. You earned a thumbs down.
Thanks for the feedback, we’ll take it into account.
You talk TOOOOOOO fast, also your pitch of your voice was hard to understand a lot of what you were saying........Sorry
Thanks for the feedback! I'll take this into account for the videos to come!
Background music is awful
Looks like the Cessna CJ-4 doesn't make the cut.
It is in the pipeline! I've made a note of your comment you posted last month, the video will come within the next 4 weeks!
The PC 24 is the Swiss knife of the skies!
I PREFER THE PHENOM 300E, BECAUSE FROM MY POINT OF VIEW, IT FITS MY DIFFINTION OF TRUE QUALITY AND BEAUTY, I DON'T NEED THE EXTERA ROOM OR MORE RUNWAYS ACCESS THAT THE PC24 PROVIDS!!!
Yup, in any aircraft purchase, it starts and ends with mission. If you need a jet that can land on unimproved strips and that can be loaded with a forklift, the PC24 is for you. If you don’t need these and comfort and luxury are key, though the PC24 is no slouch, the Phenom 300E is your choice in this class. But you should also consider the Cessna Citation CJ4. Beyond these, you now require a second pilot. Me? Phenom 300E please.