The problem with the term “Hate Crime” is that it will constantly evolve into different forms to accommodate an ever-increasingly sensitive proportion of the population. It also allows people in Governments to pass “hate-speech” laws that may aim to serve those who are the so-called “oppressed”, but arguably more so their desire for more control over free speech with the objective to limit any threats to their power and political party.
In Alex jones trial, Mark Bankston(the Sandy hook parent's lawyer) said when referring to alex: "He is patient zero for "alternative facts"". "Take him out of this discourse". "make sure he cant do it again. That is punishment. That is deterrence"."I hope that we never see someone like him agian. I hope that with your verdict he can go away"."I ask that with your verdict, you not only take alex jones platform that he talks about away, i ask that you make certain he cant rebuild the platform, thats what matters"."Alex jones is patient zero for our society's inability to speak without lies". (Mark bankston lies alot, rules for thee not for me). Reportedly. Gov and mainstream media get to lie all the time, but they call truth lies. If u call a man a man, u could likely be sued for $millions plus be banned from speaking, and being on the internet if they had their way. Criminally charge alex's judge, Judge Barbara Bellis (is her name reportedly) with violating freedom of speech. Alex jones shouldnt get in trouble. Freedom of speech. Criminally charge alex's judge for violating freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means all speech. Gov and mainstream news purposely lie all the time, plus they report info they were told like reading a teleprompter, that isnt true and they often dont correct themself, or sometimes they do, either way they dont get in trouble. Alex shouldnt get in trouble for doing what basically everyone does sometimes. Alex wasn't trying to mislead anyone and had no bad intentions. All speech including lies must be legal, or else gov will lie and call anyone it doesn't like a liar to sue/charge/steal from them. Teach people not to blindly believe anything, assume, or treat people different based on things others said about them. No one is responsible for someone elses actions. People have the right to be able to say and think what they want, choose who to associate and assemble with, who to watch or give attention or money to, and who to like or dislike. Look into statues of limitations. "Sec. 16.002. ONE-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) A person must bring suit for malicious prosecution, libel, slander, or breach of promise of marriage not later than one year after the day the cause of action accrues." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL SUBTITLE B. TRIAL MATTERS CHAPTER 16. LIMITATIONS SUBCHAPTER A. LIMITATIONS OF PERSONAL ACTIONS statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.16.htm "Art. 12.02. MISDEMEANORS. (a) An indictment or information for any Class A or Class B misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward. (b) A complaint or information for any Class C misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward." CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm "Art. 12.06. AN INDICTMENT IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An indictment is considered as "presented" when it has been duly acted upon by the grand jury and received by the court." Art. 12.07. AN INFORMATION IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An information is considered as "presented," when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court." "felony indictments may be presented within these limits, and not afterward:" "(8) three years from the date of the commission of the offense: all other felonies." CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION Art. 12.01. FELONIES. statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm#12.03 "Sec. 73.059. EFFECT OF CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. If a correction, clarification, or retraction is made in accordance with this subchapter, regardless of whether the person claiming harm made a request, a person may not recover exemplary damages unless the publication was made with actual malice." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 4. LIABILITY IN TORT CHAPTER 73. LIBEL SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS statutes.capitol.texas.gov/DocViewer.aspx?DocKey=CP%2fCP.73&Phrases=Defamation&HighlightType=1&ExactPhrase=False&QueryText=Defamation "(c) If not later than the 90th day after receiving knowledge of the publication, the person does not request a correction, clarification, or retraction, the person may not recover exemplary damages." Sec. 73.055. REQUEST FOR CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. "(5) "Exemplary damages" means any damages awarded as a penalty or by way of punishment but not for compensatory purposes. Exemplary damages are neither economic nor noneconomic damages. 'Exemplary damages' includes punitive damages." "(7) "Malice" means a specific intent by the defendant to cause substantial injury or harm to the claimant." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL SUBTITLE C. JUDGMENTS CHAPTER 41. DAMAGES Sec. 41.001. DEFINITIONS. statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.41.htm Criminally charge the judge with violating freedom of speech. Why dont they put the guy questioning alex on trail instead hes doing the same thing they r accusing alex of. Aka lying
Not political party, the owners of censorship are united against inteligent and goid people, and to defeat them, they use manipulable idi0ts, they use humanity against humanity.
@@bvegannow1936 And another problem is that everything is guionizated, for me is obviously that the goverments did everything, but they create false rebels, with many purposes, like alex or kanye
@@lemonrocsthat’s not true and it’s a cheap low hanging fruit argument that was always going to be made regardless of how Elon operated Twitter. The truth is that the platform was absurdly favorable to liberal ideals while censoring, shadow banning, fact checking anything criticizing the left. Elon has evened the playing field while ridding the platform of bots. I’m sorry if you have to deal with comments that hurt your feelings but there is absolutely zero evidence of the platform now being more or less favorable to either side of the political spectrum
Let me unravel some twisted logic here. Whether you like what someone says or not, you should let them speak. That's free speech. Agreed. 👍 But when some people spread falsehoods, rumours, hate and discrimination, they must be stopped. That's not free speech.👎 Also, town-square is what free speech will create. And bounds of law must include how social media platforms must be made responsible, and held accountable, for abusive and fake content that's posted on it, by its users.
No human being is truly free. The moment we're born, we unknowingly agree to the laws created by man prior to our arrival. I feel as though i should be compensated for being fraudulently forced into a contract while not being in a state of mind to nderstand what i was agreeing to.
Don't try so hard everyone that comes at you makes you give a reason to react. Purpose is meaning and meaningless purpose and that's all I got to say right now
*Well ... this aged like rotten milk!* Musky now banning journos from Twitter because they dared to criticise him! Way to go Musky - buy Twitter for $44 billion, and then vent your petty grievances while the business collapses! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You can't win a law suit unless you prove that it is slander, libel or a lie that does harm. People are always calling others bad slurs and names without consequences.
I honour freedom of speech! Whether its over any political issues, any law, and or any disagreement over our residents & our citizenship status! I just wanna yoall to keep it in mind! A major difference between freedom of speech, invasive speech, and hate crime! Just don't get yourself be caught in the middle of the situation, which occurred at or about 1900hours today, May 11, 2022! That was invasive! That was harassment! That was a hate crime! It looked pretty stupid, when the table got rolled. Wasn't it!? It really excited me!
All speech is speech. Free speech means free speech. It doesn't mean u r free to say whatever gov thinks is ok for u to say. U cant say anything without someone being upset over it. If they r upset over words thats their problem.
Defective mind so I give reasons for when to shut up and not be hurt or listen to Free speeches and knowledge and one knowing that they have a right to speak and have reason to say something that has a moment
You are full of free speech and a lot to say but one doesn't have commentary too. You don't have to answer to so beautiful. You can men either give him half
The beautiful thing of bad at all. I love your nervousness. It's a cutest thing I've ever saw in my life. I would not want to have anything other than that here. You're special and so many ways and you don't even know it carry on
In Alex jones trial, Mark Bankston(the Sandy hook parent's lawyer) said when referring to alex: "He is patient zero for "alternative facts"". "Take him out of this discourse". "make sure he cant do it again. That is punishment. That is deterrence"."I hope that we never see someone like him agian. I hope that with your verdict he can go away"."I ask that with your verdict, you not only take alex jones platform that he talks about away, i ask that you make certain he cant rebuild the platform, thats what matters"."Alex jones is patient zero for our society's inability to speak without lies". (Mark bankston lies alot, rules for thee not for me). Reportedly. Gov and mainstream media get to lie all the time, but they call truth lies. If u call a man a man, u could likely be sued for $millions plus be banned from speaking, and being on the internet if they had their way. Criminally charge alex's judge, Judge Barbara Bellis (is her name reportedly) with violating freedom of speech. Alex jones shouldnt get in trouble. Freedom of speech. Criminally charge alex's judge for violating freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means all speech. Gov and mainstream news purposely lie all the time, plus they report info they were told like reading a teleprompter, that isnt true and they often dont correct themself, or sometimes they do, either way they dont get in trouble. Alex shouldnt get in trouble for doing what basically everyone does sometimes. Alex wasn't trying to mislead anyone and had no bad intentions. All speech including lies must be legal, or else gov will lie and call anyone it doesn't like a liar to sue/charge/steal from them. Teach people not to blindly believe anything, assume, or treat people different based on things others said about them. No one is responsible for someone elses actions. People have the right to be able to say and think what they want, choose who to associate and assemble with, who to watch or give attention or money to, and who to like or dislike. Look into statues of limitations. "Sec. 16.002. ONE-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) A person must bring suit for malicious prosecution, libel, slander, or breach of promise of marriage not later than one year after the day the cause of action accrues." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL SUBTITLE B. TRIAL MATTERS CHAPTER 16. LIMITATIONS SUBCHAPTER A. LIMITATIONS OF PERSONAL ACTIONS statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.16.htm "Art. 12.02. MISDEMEANORS. (a) An indictment or information for any Class A or Class B misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward. (b) A complaint or information for any Class C misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward." CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm "Art. 12.06. AN INDICTMENT IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An indictment is considered as "presented" when it has been duly acted upon by the grand jury and received by the court." Art. 12.07. AN INFORMATION IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An information is considered as "presented," when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court." "felony indictments may be presented within these limits, and not afterward:" "(8) three years from the date of the commission of the offense: all other felonies." CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION Art. 12.01. FELONIES. statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm#12.03 "Sec. 73.059. EFFECT OF CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. If a correction, clarification, or retraction is made in accordance with this subchapter, regardless of whether the person claiming harm made a request, a person may not recover exemplary damages unless the publication was made with actual malice." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 4. LIABILITY IN TORT CHAPTER 73. LIBEL SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS statutes.capitol.texas.gov/DocViewer.aspx?DocKey=CP%2fCP.73&Phrases=Defamation&HighlightType=1&ExactPhrase=False&QueryText=Defamation "(c) If not later than the 90th day after receiving knowledge of the publication, the person does not request a correction, clarification, or retraction, the person may not recover exemplary damages." Sec. 73.055. REQUEST FOR CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. "(5) "Exemplary damages" means any damages awarded as a penalty or by way of punishment but not for compensatory purposes. Exemplary damages are neither economic nor noneconomic damages. 'Exemplary damages' includes punitive damages." "(7) "Malice" means a specific intent by the defendant to cause substantial injury or harm to the claimant." CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL SUBTITLE C. JUDGMENTS CHAPTER 41. DAMAGES Sec. 41.001. DEFINITIONS. statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.41.htm Criminally charge the judge with violating freedom of speech. Why dont they put the guy questioning alex on trail instead hes doing the same thing they r accusing alex of. Aka lying
Hmmm. The First amendment doesn’t say that “Free Speech” requires newspapers, publishers or their modern equivalent - social media companies have to publish everything everyone says. That would more like abridging the freedom of the press.
He's a salesperson people forgot about that! You don't buy a failing company for more than it's worth to give somebody free speech come on people every salesperson has an angle he heard what you wanted and he said he deliver as long as you let him close the deal and you'll stay around for the rest of it! Wake up America! It's time!
Keep dreaming... I grow up very poor days with no food.. always struggling for food and rent... Came to Norway... thought.. freedom..no more worries about food or rent in the richest place on earth... And those bureaucratic scum behind desks with their million salary decided to bring back my childhood misery and make my life about nothing but food and rent... Dreams are made to die...
If someone says something you don't like, free speech lets you say something back. And when someone says something that hurts a lot of people, they should express their outrage verbally en masse. This is how free speech works: you won't get arrested or sanctioned but others can express their agreement, disagreement, disbelief, contempt, etc. in response!
RUclips should be more lenient about freedom of speech. When Muslims and Hamas advocates or Palestinian protesters are allowed to bash and lie about Israel but defenders of The Israelis are reminded to watch their coments and be respectful, that is very biased. When podcasters are allowed to say all kinds of trash talk but truth is monitored and rebuked, this is not freedom of speech. Some people are even allowed to use foul language. But then if you defend truth or facts you are sent a msg. One sided correcting was done by twitter.
Well then that's your issue not mine! When the world comes to an end in Jesus comes back you'll be the first one crying so don't act so tough now I'm not impressed!
The problem with the term “Hate Crime” is that it will constantly evolve into different forms to accommodate an ever-increasingly sensitive proportion of the population. It also allows people in Governments to pass “hate-speech” laws that may aim to serve those who are the so-called “oppressed”, but arguably more so their desire for more control over free speech with the objective to limit any threats to their power and political party.
I guess ignorance is bliss.
In Alex jones trial, Mark Bankston(the Sandy hook parent's lawyer) said when referring to alex: "He is patient zero for "alternative facts"". "Take him out of this discourse". "make sure he cant do it again. That is punishment. That is deterrence"."I hope that we never see someone like him agian. I hope that with your verdict he can go away"."I ask that with your verdict, you not only take alex jones platform that he talks about away, i ask that you make certain he cant rebuild the platform, thats what matters"."Alex jones is patient zero for our society's inability to speak without lies". (Mark bankston lies alot, rules for thee not for me). Reportedly.
Gov and mainstream media get to lie all the time, but they call truth lies. If u call a man a man, u could likely be sued for $millions plus be banned from speaking, and being on the internet if they had their way.
Criminally charge alex's judge, Judge Barbara Bellis (is her name reportedly) with violating freedom of speech.
Alex jones shouldnt get in trouble. Freedom of speech. Criminally charge alex's judge for violating freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means all speech. Gov and mainstream news purposely lie all the time, plus they report info they were told like reading a teleprompter, that isnt true and they often dont correct themself, or sometimes they do, either way they dont get in trouble. Alex shouldnt get in trouble for doing what basically everyone does sometimes. Alex wasn't trying to mislead anyone and had no bad intentions.
All speech including lies must be legal, or else gov will lie and call anyone it doesn't like a liar to sue/charge/steal from them.
Teach people not to blindly believe anything, assume, or treat people different based on things others said about them. No one is responsible for someone elses actions.
People have the right to be able to say and think what they want, choose who to associate and assemble with, who to watch or give attention or money to, and who to like or dislike.
Look into statues of limitations.
"Sec. 16.002. ONE-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) A person must bring suit for malicious prosecution, libel, slander, or breach of promise of marriage not later than one year after the day the cause of action accrues."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
SUBTITLE B. TRIAL MATTERS
CHAPTER 16. LIMITATIONS
SUBCHAPTER A. LIMITATIONS OF PERSONAL ACTIONS
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.16.htm
"Art. 12.02. MISDEMEANORS. (a) An indictment or information for any Class A or Class B misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward.
(b) A complaint or information for any Class C misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward."
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm
"Art. 12.06. AN INDICTMENT IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An indictment is considered as "presented" when it has been duly acted upon by the grand jury and received by the court."
Art. 12.07. AN INFORMATION IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An information is considered as "presented," when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court."
"felony indictments may be presented within these limits, and not afterward:"
"(8) three years from the date of the commission of the offense: all other felonies."
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION
Art. 12.01. FELONIES.
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm#12.03
"Sec. 73.059. EFFECT OF CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. If a correction, clarification, or retraction is made in accordance with this subchapter, regardless of whether the person claiming harm made a request, a person may not recover exemplary damages unless the publication was made with actual malice."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 4. LIABILITY IN TORT
CHAPTER 73. LIBEL
SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/DocViewer.aspx?DocKey=CP%2fCP.73&Phrases=Defamation&HighlightType=1&ExactPhrase=False&QueryText=Defamation
"(c) If not later than the 90th day after receiving knowledge of the publication, the person does not request a correction, clarification, or retraction, the person may not recover exemplary damages."
Sec. 73.055. REQUEST FOR CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION.
"(5) "Exemplary damages" means any damages awarded as a penalty or by way of punishment but not for compensatory purposes. Exemplary damages are neither economic nor noneconomic damages. 'Exemplary damages' includes punitive damages."
"(7) "Malice" means a specific intent by the defendant to cause substantial injury or harm to the claimant."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
SUBTITLE C. JUDGMENTS
CHAPTER 41. DAMAGES
Sec. 41.001. DEFINITIONS.
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.41.htm
Criminally charge the judge with violating freedom of speech.
Why dont they put the guy questioning alex on trail instead hes doing the same thing they r accusing alex of. Aka lying
Not political party, the owners of censorship are united against inteligent and goid people, and to defeat them, they use manipulable idi0ts, they use humanity against humanity.
@@lemonrocs Ignorance is a bliss for a time, but that time ends, and knowledge and ignorance change places
@@bvegannow1936 And another problem is that everything is guionizated, for me is obviously that the goverments did everything, but they create false rebels, with many purposes, like alex or kanye
Ask Jack Sweeney where Elon falls on the scale of honesty, credibility, hypocrisy, and liar, liar, pants on FIRE!
Awesome person period
Except it's only free speech for Elon. Scratch the surface he's not forth coming about his history with others free speech.
@@lemonrocsthat’s not true and it’s a cheap low hanging fruit argument that was always going to be made regardless of how Elon operated Twitter. The truth is that the platform was absurdly favorable to liberal ideals while censoring, shadow banning, fact checking anything criticizing the left. Elon has evened the playing field while ridding the platform of bots. I’m sorry if you have to deal with comments that hurt your feelings but there is absolutely zero evidence of the platform now being more or less favorable to either side of the political spectrum
Slow talking hypocrite, twitter is as far away from free speech as it was under Dorsey.
Free speech within the bounds of the law isn't free speech
How about free speech to organize a union.
Shhh, we don't talk about that around daddy Elon
Nope he'll sue the shit out of you 🤣👏
Or free speech to spread information (see Elon suing media matters).
昨天/是到底又發生什麼了/我老是覺得/不知道又怎麼了/感覺情況就又不好了/可是卻不知道原因/你要我每天再隔著一層/抱著你嗎/你為什麼不出現呢/就昨天/我真的不知道到底發生什麼了/你有在台灣等我沒等到嗎/我覺得/我已經出去了你卻又沒有來/再這樣/有誤會/卻不知道到底是什麼誤會的繼續下去/我覺得我會沒命的/昨天/你有在郵局等我卻沒等到嗎/怎麼我覺得/我已經出去了/卻沒有看到你出現呢/現在/我也不知道要再怎麼繼續/跡象顯示/你就又要再回美國後再做出/有如去年九月十二日的事/或者再出自傳/再爆你跟女員工/女明星已經同居的事/如果至今你也還在/你要我怎麼辦呢/而我已經說過/我自買了這隻手機sugar c60/我就一隻是接受你的意思/你卻屢臨陣脫逃/還是又改變主意不想要表態/為什麼/你要一再反覆測試我/到我已經覺得/我沒有命再繼續等待/陰晴不定/隨時都會變卦的你/我也不知道我到底要怎麼做/要你出現/就跟我說一句話/真的這麼困難嗎/我真的不懂你/如今你想要怎麼樣呢/
Let me unravel some twisted logic here. Whether you like what someone says or not, you should let them speak. That's free speech. Agreed. 👍 But when some people spread falsehoods, rumours, hate and discrimination, they must be stopped. That's not free speech.👎
Also, town-square is what free speech will create. And bounds of law must include how social media platforms must be made responsible, and held accountable, for abusive and fake content that's posted on it, by its users.
He’s not for free speech
Why did Twitter ban ye
No human being is truly free. The moment we're born, we unknowingly agree to the laws created by man prior to our arrival. I feel as though i should be compensated for being fraudulently forced into a contract while not being in a state of mind to nderstand what i was agreeing to.
Free Speech for Elon Musk means the freedom to post and repost antisemitic and disinformation posts without impunity on his platform.
Don't try so hard everyone that comes at you makes you give a reason to react. Purpose is meaning and meaningless purpose and that's all I got to say right now
my love❤❤. social medias like meta havr no freedom of speech. they just remove all comment in excuse of hate speach
Free Alex Jones!
Where's this attitude while dealing with govt imposed restrictions on Twitter posts
*Well ... this aged like rotten milk!*
Musky now banning journos from Twitter because they dared to criticise him!
Way to go Musky - buy Twitter for $44 billion, and then vent your petty grievances while the business collapses! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Please have free speech about ccp😂😂😂 about bur tesla..
Maybe he should tell Bill Bates and George Soros this
Ask him about the free speech of people who say things he doesn't like...he sues the shit out of them..
Yes because free speech doesn’t protect slander
You can't win a law suit unless you prove that it is slander, libel or a lie that does harm. People are always calling others bad slurs and names without consequences.
@@troystaunton254if you want to oppress people for slander then you don't support free speech.
That's not what he's against. ''Say whatever you want to say and then embrace the consequences.''
How can we have free speech within the bounds of the law when we've got people like Julian Asange imprisoned.
well said 👏
Jimmy Kimmel black face video please
Free speech has never existed to protect popular opinions. It’s to protect question popular opinions.
If this man was eligible to run for President and really wanted to he'd definitely have my vote 💯✌️
I honour freedom of speech! Whether its over any political issues, any law, and or any disagreement over our residents & our citizenship status!
I just wanna yoall to keep it in mind!
A major difference between freedom of speech, invasive speech, and hate crime!
Just don't get yourself
be caught in the middle of the situation, which occurred at or about 1900hours today, May 11, 2022!
That was invasive!
That was harassment!
That was a hate crime!
It looked pretty stupid, when the table got rolled. Wasn't it!?
It really excited me!
All speech is speech. Free speech means free speech. It doesn't mean u r free to say whatever gov thinks is ok for u to say. U cant say anything without someone being upset over it. If they r upset over words thats their problem.
The perception.....
Free speech can be healthy, but only if you're talking to the right people. That's Rafe speech. I love you, Evan
Defective mind so I give reasons for when to shut up and not be hurt or listen to Free speeches and knowledge and one knowing that they have a right to speak and have reason to say something that has a moment
P😊
Don't listen to me. I'm freedom of free speech but I'll let you know everyone that's coming at you. Give him sugar sugar
You are full of free speech and a lot to say but one doesn't have commentary too. You don't have to answer to so beautiful. You can men either give him half
The beautiful thing of bad at all. I love your nervousness. It's a cutest thing I've ever saw in my life. I would not want to have anything other than that here. You're special and so many ways and you don't even know it carry on
And that's not what I said. But it's cute. You're a special person carry on
Republic.
In Alex jones trial, Mark Bankston(the Sandy hook parent's lawyer) said when referring to alex: "He is patient zero for "alternative facts"". "Take him out of this discourse". "make sure he cant do it again. That is punishment. That is deterrence"."I hope that we never see someone like him agian. I hope that with your verdict he can go away"."I ask that with your verdict, you not only take alex jones platform that he talks about away, i ask that you make certain he cant rebuild the platform, thats what matters"."Alex jones is patient zero for our society's inability to speak without lies". (Mark bankston lies alot, rules for thee not for me). Reportedly.
Gov and mainstream media get to lie all the time, but they call truth lies. If u call a man a man, u could likely be sued for $millions plus be banned from speaking, and being on the internet if they had their way.
Criminally charge alex's judge, Judge Barbara Bellis (is her name reportedly) with violating freedom of speech.
Alex jones shouldnt get in trouble. Freedom of speech. Criminally charge alex's judge for violating freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means all speech. Gov and mainstream news purposely lie all the time, plus they report info they were told like reading a teleprompter, that isnt true and they often dont correct themself, or sometimes they do, either way they dont get in trouble. Alex shouldnt get in trouble for doing what basically everyone does sometimes. Alex wasn't trying to mislead anyone and had no bad intentions.
All speech including lies must be legal, or else gov will lie and call anyone it doesn't like a liar to sue/charge/steal from them.
Teach people not to blindly believe anything, assume, or treat people different based on things others said about them. No one is responsible for someone elses actions.
People have the right to be able to say and think what they want, choose who to associate and assemble with, who to watch or give attention or money to, and who to like or dislike.
Look into statues of limitations.
"Sec. 16.002. ONE-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) A person must bring suit for malicious prosecution, libel, slander, or breach of promise of marriage not later than one year after the day the cause of action accrues."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
SUBTITLE B. TRIAL MATTERS
CHAPTER 16. LIMITATIONS
SUBCHAPTER A. LIMITATIONS OF PERSONAL ACTIONS
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.16.htm
"Art. 12.02. MISDEMEANORS. (a) An indictment or information for any Class A or Class B misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward.
(b) A complaint or information for any Class C misdemeanor may be presented within two years from the date of the commission of the offense, and not afterward."
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm
"Art. 12.06. AN INDICTMENT IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An indictment is considered as "presented" when it has been duly acted upon by the grand jury and received by the court."
Art. 12.07. AN INFORMATION IS "PRESENTED," WHEN. An information is considered as "presented," when it has been filed by the proper officer in the proper court."
"felony indictments may be presented within these limits, and not afterward:"
"(8) three years from the date of the commission of the offense: all other felonies."
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 12. LIMITATION
Art. 12.01. FELONIES.
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.12.htm#12.03
"Sec. 73.059. EFFECT OF CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION. If a correction, clarification, or retraction is made in accordance with this subchapter, regardless of whether the person claiming harm made a request, a person may not recover exemplary damages unless the publication was made with actual malice."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 4. LIABILITY IN TORT
CHAPTER 73. LIBEL
SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/DocViewer.aspx?DocKey=CP%2fCP.73&Phrases=Defamation&HighlightType=1&ExactPhrase=False&QueryText=Defamation
"(c) If not later than the 90th day after receiving knowledge of the publication, the person does not request a correction, clarification, or retraction, the person may not recover exemplary damages."
Sec. 73.055. REQUEST FOR CORRECTION, CLARIFICATION, OR RETRACTION.
"(5) "Exemplary damages" means any damages awarded as a penalty or by way of punishment but not for compensatory purposes. Exemplary damages are neither economic nor noneconomic damages. 'Exemplary damages' includes punitive damages."
"(7) "Malice" means a specific intent by the defendant to cause substantial injury or harm to the claimant."
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
SUBTITLE C. JUDGMENTS
CHAPTER 41. DAMAGES
Sec. 41.001. DEFINITIONS.
statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CP/htm/CP.41.htm
Criminally charge the judge with violating freedom of speech.
Why dont they put the guy questioning alex on trail instead hes doing the same thing they r accusing alex of. Aka lying
Hmmm. The First amendment doesn’t say that “Free Speech” requires newspapers, publishers or their modern equivalent - social media companies have to publish everything everyone says. That would more like abridging the freedom of the press.
Free speech?
He's telking crazy !
Anyone who trusts Elon Musk to defend free speech is hopelessly naive.
THANK YOU
They're the same ones that were the mask when they were driving their cars!
@@incaseyoudidntknow6325 What??? That makes no fucking sense. And if you were trying to be funny, you failed miserably.
And anyone that thinks tiwitter was more fair, honest and trustworthy before Elon took it over is mentally disabled.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions 💯✌️ free speech. Keep it classy y'all and I truly hope everyone has a great day 🙏💯💪✌️
Honestly, instead of trying to solve all these problems, he should just move to Monaco.
He's a salesperson people forgot about that!
You don't buy a failing company for more than it's worth to give somebody free speech come on people every salesperson has an angle he heard what you wanted and he said he deliver as long as you let him close the deal and you'll stay around for the rest of it!
Wake up America! It's time!
Democracy
Keep dreaming...
I grow up very poor days with no food.. always struggling for food and rent...
Came to Norway... thought.. freedom..no more worries about food or rent in the richest place on earth...
And those bureaucratic scum behind desks with their million salary decided to bring back my childhood misery and make my life about nothing but food and rent...
Dreams are made to die...
And he's one of those million-dollar scumbags!
Elon I agree 💯 with you. I want to here what others have to say even if I don't like it.
IRELAND 🇮🇪 & CANADA 🇨🇦 NEED FREE SPEECH. 😢 😭
NOW YOUR TALKING FREE SPEACH
Speach? Speeches And Cream?
@@18JR78 OK 👊👋😠😖 perfect one speech maybe I'm hungry 😋
Elon is super based
Uhhhh no he’s not, he did union busting and tried to stop people from speaking out against discrimination at Tesla.
he had a section at his factory called "The Plantation" where all the black employees were segregated
I think the show is about to begin!
as if...
It is annoying , When Some one you do not like . Says something you do not like , Elon Musk
Of course it’s annoying but that’s an inevitable consequence of free speech. Something this man has reinstated on X
Great thought from a legendary businessman of 21st century. Free speech should be absolute.
Yes
If someone says something you don't like, free speech lets you say something back. And when someone says something that hurts a lot of people, they should express their outrage verbally en masse. This is how free speech works: you won't get arrested or sanctioned but others can express their agreement, disagreement, disbelief, contempt, etc. in response!
Would be lovely, unfortunately, people like musk think that they should get to decide your speech.just look at how he's suing media matters
RUclips should be more lenient about freedom of speech. When Muslims and Hamas advocates or Palestinian protesters are allowed to bash and lie about Israel but defenders of The Israelis are reminded to watch their coments and be respectful, that is very biased. When podcasters are allowed to say all kinds of trash talk but truth is monitored and rebuked, this is not freedom of speech. Some people are even allowed to use foul language. But then if you defend truth or facts you are sent a msg. One sided correcting was done by twitter.
That's not important.
A friend of mine on FB said this man is a "fascist". :(
Well then that's your issue not mine!
When the world comes to an end in Jesus comes back you'll be the first one crying so don't act so tough now I'm not impressed!
@@incaseyoudidntknow6325 I don't belive in god either.
He is. He is suing people for their speech.
This is weird coming from the guy who canceled a customer's Tesla order because said customer was critical about a bad presentation he gave
At least one person's figuring it out!
My respect for Elon ❤️❤️❤️
He's a hypocrite. He's suing media matters for their speech.