this confirms the theory and old tales of aryans attacking indian lands and taking over , and after making varnas system in which the euresians ( aryans) were high cast and the dravidians the orignal ( low cast) were made slaves by the aryan attackers of euresia. ex bal gangadhar tilas wrote a book artic in the vedas and said high cast people in india brahman, chatriya and veshya came from artic and stayed on india lands, jawaharlal nehru wrote a book named discovery of india and explained how they came from outside india . in 2001 michael bamshad proved the reality the high cast people are really from outside india with the dna test in collabaration with andra pradesh government and 6 india origin in his team and thus the aryans and dravidians theory gets a yes nod
Michael bamsad ka uske mom dad ka DNA nai match nahi hota aur wo loda hamara DNA match karne chala hai lekin hamare yaha ke kai liberals to uss bahaar vale videshi ka chaat rahe hai..
What I got from this lecture was the fact that, thanks to Political Correctness, you have to spend an hour saying that there's no such thing as race before you start into a ten minute speech about how the races evolved.
Pretty much! Call it race or whatever you want, there are some major differences between people around the world. Difference groups have different levels of intelligence and they create different societies. To acknowledge this obvious fact is called racism.
@@hobgoblin9146 Nah, pretending that human capacities and difference are defined in your narrow definition of race, and that with that information you can conclude that you are superior to people based upon that group affiliation is called racism. It is actually very simple. Cultural differences exist and should be celebrated.
@@DavidBrunnerstupidamerican The classically recognized races differ on average in cognitive capacity, average projected wealth income, criminality, and is the cause of other phenomena like white flight. Its important to recognize race, because race has ramifications for society. The fact that race has ramifications for society is all the justification we need to recognize race as a valid category. Furthermore, we know these differences, these gaps, are primarily down to genetics and not culture. How do we know that? Identical twin studies. You take two identical twins and raise them in separate environments and from that we can tease out how much of behavior is nature vs nurture. Spoiler alert: none of the twin studies support your stupid cultural differences causation. Culture flows from biology, not the other way around. Race has ramifications for society, and race is both social and biological. Superior and inferior are your words. Those of us that don't deny science have no need for words like superior and inferior. For us it is enough to say that the races are different and that those differences have ramifications for society. But you refuse to consider this because you've been raised to believe that some ideas are heresy, or 'racist' as you call it. And keep this in mind, white people are being blamed for the shortcomings of other races. Instead of looking at biology for an explanation, your religion of diversity explains these achievement gaps as being magically the fault of white people and that white people are these devils that need to be brought to heel. This is called scapegoating, and historically it has never ended well.
@@Nork490 Oh, of that there can be no doubt. Of course in the version of race you use there are definite differences in "average" cognitive capacity, average projected wealth, etc. etc. The funny thing is you left out one important fact. Those differences also show up when you analyze different ethnic groupings, different tribes, different religions, or if you want to talk about India. . .different "castes". And just like in these other situations, "societies", countries, or what have you, those grouping mechanisms are used to explain those differences. The only difference between your grouping mechanism and those other methods is that you believe your definition is based upon science. Which it is not. There is no genetic description for a "White" person. There are only phenotypical traits that you use to define "Whiteness". An African-American can have 50% of their DNA traced back to Europe. But be 100% "Black" in terms of your racial qualification system. Because in race theory, there is only one pure race, "White" people. In fact, race theory only defines two races. "White" people and people who are not "White". It does nothing to describe non-"White" people, because it was not invented to describe non-"White" people. Your analysis of identical twins is nonsensical. How does that tie into anything we are talking about? Either there is a genetic description for race or there is not. And there is not. That is a fact. You can pretend that racism does not exist. You can pretend Nazis never murdered six million Jews. That is your affair. I live in the real world. In a world where these fantasies and mythologies have ruined and destroyed the lives of innocent people. And in today's world, clever terms like political correctness and globalism, are being used to justify conspiracy theories created to explain why certain people are experiencing a decline in the level of income or success they previously enjoyed. Nothing you say here is driven by any need to make any scientific discovery or benefit humankind. Racism is driven by the need for people to build a class that is exclusive, that deserves benefits and opportunities that other "races" do not. And when people feel that this grouping gives them rights above and beyond that of others, we have seen what they do. The devastation has only been repeated again and again over throughout history.
Ah, the ole “out of Africa” hypothesis. Why is that hypothesis only used to benefit Blacks in White countries outside Africa? In America & Europe, we’re told “we’re all from Africa” so we have to set aside our ethnic interests to not offend our Black “cousins.” In South Africa, even though “we’re all from Africa,” we’re told Whites have no right to the country they built. People shouting “we’re all from Africa” to “fight racism” aren’t anti-racist at all. They’re anti-White.
What makes a German person German is they have ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to them. What makes a Zulu person Zulu is they have ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to them. Having ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to you and your collective community is what makes you you. It's more than just a socially constructed "culture" that anyone can join or leave whenever they please. It's something in your blood. Why exactly is admitting this so controversial? When people say race is a social construct are they saying lineages and geography are social constructs? Is putting your 10th cousins above your 80th cousins really a social construct?
What is biodiversity or race ? Surely its nothing more than regional adaptations imposed by regional selection pressures, on an original stock of archaic humans. All other issues seem to be the result of dumass tribalism and our propensity to negatively exaggerate and perpetuate differences ?
@@beyond2535 agar sabhi Africa se hi aaye hai ye mical bamsad ke thiyori me bhi hai .to bhimte Bharat ke mulnivashi kese ho sakte hai.o to Africa ke hi mulnivashi ho kiyu ki salo apne aap ko Bharat ke mulnibashi kahte ho salo tum bhi bideshi ho aur chor lutere bhi
this confirms the theory and old tales of aryans attacking indian lands and taking over , and after making varnas system in which the euresians ( aryans) were high cast and the dravidians the orignal ( low cast) were made slaves by the aryan attackers of euresia.
ex bal gangadhar tilas wrote a book artic in the vedas and said high cast people in india brahman, chatriya and veshya came from artic and stayed on india lands, jawaharlal nehru wrote a book named discovery of india and explained how they came from outside india .
in 2001 michael bamshad proved the reality the high cast people are really from outside india with the dna test in collabaration with andra pradesh government and 6 india origin in his team and thus the aryans and dravidians theory gets a yes nod
Exactly....👌
@@nikhilwankhade4634 thanks bro
@@ravi82157 Absolutely. Now Indian people know their true enemy.
Illiterate people.
Michael bamsad ka uske mom dad ka DNA nai match nahi hota aur wo loda hamara DNA match karne chala hai lekin hamare yaha ke kai liberals to uss bahaar vale videshi ka chaat rahe hai..
What I got from this lecture was the fact that, thanks to Political Correctness, you have to spend an hour saying that there's no such thing as race before you start into a ten minute speech about how the races evolved.
Pretty much! Call it race or whatever you want, there are some major differences between people around the world. Difference groups have different levels of intelligence and they create different societies. To acknowledge this obvious fact is called racism.
@@hobgoblin9146 Nah, pretending that human capacities and difference are defined in your narrow definition of race, and that with that information you can conclude that you are superior to people based upon that group affiliation is called racism. It is actually very simple. Cultural differences exist and should be celebrated.
@@DavidBrunnerstupidamerican The classically recognized races differ on average in cognitive capacity, average projected wealth income, criminality, and is the cause of other phenomena like white flight. Its important to recognize race, because race has ramifications for society. The fact that race has ramifications for society is all the justification we need to recognize race as a valid category.
Furthermore, we know these differences, these gaps, are primarily down to genetics and not culture. How do we know that? Identical twin studies. You take two identical twins and raise them in separate environments and from that we can tease out how much of behavior is nature vs nurture. Spoiler alert: none of the twin studies support your stupid cultural differences causation. Culture flows from biology, not the other way around. Race has ramifications for society, and race is both social and biological.
Superior and inferior are your words. Those of us that don't deny science have no need for words like superior and inferior. For us it is enough to say that the races are different and that those differences have ramifications for society. But you refuse to consider this because you've been raised to believe that some ideas are heresy, or 'racist' as you call it. And keep this in mind, white people are being blamed for the shortcomings of other races. Instead of looking at biology for an explanation, your religion of diversity explains these achievement gaps as being magically the fault of white people and that white people are these devils that need to be brought to heel. This is called scapegoating, and historically it has never ended well.
@@Nork490
Oh, of that there can be no doubt. Of course in the version of race you use there are definite differences in "average" cognitive capacity, average projected wealth, etc. etc. The funny thing is you left out one important fact. Those differences also show up when you analyze different ethnic groupings, different tribes, different religions, or if you want to talk about India. . .different "castes". And just like in these other situations, "societies", countries, or what have you, those grouping mechanisms are used to explain those differences. The only difference between your grouping mechanism and those other methods is that you believe your definition is based upon science. Which it is not.
There is no genetic description for a "White" person. There are only phenotypical traits that you use to define "Whiteness". An African-American can have 50% of their DNA traced back to Europe. But be 100% "Black" in terms of your racial qualification system. Because in race theory, there is only one pure race, "White" people. In fact, race theory only defines two races. "White" people and people who are not "White". It does nothing to describe non-"White" people, because it was not invented to describe non-"White" people.
Your analysis of identical twins is nonsensical. How does that tie into anything we are talking about? Either there is a genetic description for race or there is not. And there is not. That is a fact.
You can pretend that racism does not exist. You can pretend Nazis never murdered six million Jews. That is your affair. I live in the real world. In a world where these fantasies and mythologies have ruined and destroyed the lives of innocent people. And in today's world, clever terms like political correctness and globalism, are being used to justify conspiracy theories created to explain why certain people are experiencing a decline in the level of income or success they previously enjoyed. Nothing you say here is driven by any need to make any scientific discovery or benefit humankind.
Racism is driven by the need for people to build a class that is exclusive, that deserves benefits and opportunities that other "races" do not. And when people feel that this grouping gives them rights above and beyond that of others, we have seen what they do. The devastation has only been repeated again and again over throughout history.
Exactly
बोल पचासी जय मुलनिवासी ब्राह्मण विदेशी
That last part was very good. I'm in the same boat, having roots in Asia, Africa and Europe.
Ah, the ole “out of Africa” hypothesis.
Why is that hypothesis only used to benefit Blacks in White countries outside Africa?
In America & Europe, we’re told “we’re all from Africa” so we have to set aside our ethnic interests to not offend our Black “cousins.”
In South Africa, even though “we’re all from Africa,” we’re told Whites have no right to the country they built. People shouting “we’re all from Africa” to “fight racism” aren’t anti-racist at all. They’re anti-White.
European* white isn't a race, and neither is black.
बिल्कुल सही ब्राह्मण आर्य विदेशी है ये हम नहीं इनकी लिखी हुई खुद की किताब है
What makes a German person German is they have ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to them. What makes a Zulu person Zulu is they have ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to them. Having ancestors and SNPs that are exclusive and unique only to you and your collective community is what makes you you. It's more than just a socially constructed "culture" that anyone can join or leave whenever they please. It's something in your blood. Why exactly is admitting this so controversial? When people say race is a social construct are they saying lineages and geography are social constructs? Is putting your 10th cousins above your 80th cousins really a social construct?
Why try to avoid discussing organizational structures?
In fact, Bamshad has been ridiculed by Indian geneticists many times.
ब्राह्मणों की सांसे से दो चीजों से चलती है वर्ण व्यवस्था और दूसरी जाति व्यवस्था से अगर यह दोनों चीजें खत्म हो जाए तो ब्राह्मण मर जाएगा
# ब्राह्मण यूरेशिया से आया हुआ यूरेशियन ब्राह्मण है विदेशी है ब्राह्मण इन्होंने भारत में जाति व्यवस्था और वर्ण व्यवस्था बनाई है
I wouldn't use the word 'ridiculed' but 'discredited' fully.
You are creating this world horrible.
Listened to the first 14 minutes. This guy talks a lot but says very little. Full of qualifiers and provisional statements…
Weak!
Ramble, ramble
What is biodiversity or race ? Surely its nothing more than regional adaptations imposed by regional selection pressures, on an original stock of archaic humans.
All other issues seem to be the result of dumass tribalism and our propensity to negatively exaggerate and perpetuate differences ?
Bhimte bideshi Africa ke mulnivashi
@@beyond2535 agar sabhi Africa se hi aaye hai ye mical bamsad ke thiyori me bhi hai .to bhimte Bharat ke mulnivashi kese ho sakte hai.o to Africa ke hi mulnivashi ho kiyu ki salo apne aap ko Bharat ke mulnibashi kahte ho salo tum bhi bideshi ho aur chor lutere bhi
# ब्राह्मण यूरेशिया से आया हुआ यूरेशियन ब्राह्मण है विदेशी है ब्राह्मण इन्होंने भारत में जाति व्यवस्था और वर्ण व्यवस्था बनाई है