If the goal is to truly protect women, focus on taking meaningful action against domestic violence. Not that trans women in sport topic... Why? Just look into the numbers. Domestic violence is a way bigger problem.
Dave Rubin should not be allowed to escape calls of Russian funding, wherever he goes. All left leaning pundits should immediately call it out on any panel, kudos to Pakman for doing so.
@@WL1264 no lmao? he was literally one of the people alongside tim pool, benny johnson, lauren southern who were taking money from tenet media something like $10m total. The only question would be on if they were knowingly taking russian money, the girl who connected them all together is indicted alongside her husband
@@shortneckedgiraffe8018 they had no idea that the money was from Russia. There's no proof that they started to change their minds on anything, especially regarding Russia and Ukraine. So it's unfair to call them stuff like Russian puppets n shit.
@@WL1264Do you agree if you’re a parent and your 16 year old is somehow making the $1000 a week, that it might be ok to be a little superstitious of where that money comes from? And to counter your other point on, “well they didn’t change their opinions!”, you think its a little weird the Russians funded only Conservative pundits like this and not people like David, Brian, Destiny, etc?
Piers doesn't care about leftist infighting if it doesn't serve any conservative goals of making Democrats look bad. Showing a staunch liberal like Destiny fully denouncing a far leftist like Hasan, destroys the idea that the Democrats are the party of the "extreme left".
Man Piers plays completely one side in these discussions. He interrupts the liberals and lets conservatives talk over them. Then tells the liberal guests to yield their time to the conservatives so they can respond. It really is a good example of how the left lets conservatives act badly but will remain polite, relying on rules and civility to work it out. If you are the only one playing by the rules and theres no consequence to the other side breaking them then you are giving up, plain and simple
Yeah I don't understand the situation here. The Republicans pundits get to yammer on and on while brian and David keep getting interrupted every time they speak a word
Piers is such a good boy; his evidence for Democrats being turbo woke during this campaign is Trump's campaign video that shows a clip from Harris 2019 interview.
@@hunterherndon8573fuck do u mean fair game? Nothing is fair game, Trump could’ve fondled an orphanage on camera and the right would’ve still voted him in.
@Collabcreatemarketing just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it's not a big issue. A lot of video games don't even have male or female they have body type 1 and body type 2.
Remember when Kamala made trans issues the central part of her campaign, nah, me neither. Trans member of the panel voted for the Leopards Ate My Face party.
What's even more messed up is the majority of ttans people today are FTM or Female to non binary. Conservatives only talk about them in reference to mastectomy. Never any other mention of them.
Piers Morgan: Get off the trans issue, people don't want to hear it anymore, it's why you're losing! Also Piers Morgan: Let's talk about the trans issue and nothing else on my show today! People definitely don't want to hear about it and I'm definitely not farming views right now!
@@KromodenI’m 7:44 in and Piers has quite literally just stated the opposite (as in people do care/voted on the trans issue) so either you’ve misinterpreted that or he completely flips his talking point in minutes depending on which supports his arguement (frankly, I suspect the second)
@@marcus5977he flips everytime he loses are argument or the side he agrees with loses an argument. Then he acts like hes right before switching to the next topic even when hes obviously not. I get why england got rid of him.
Piers keeps asserting, on a purposefully disingenuous way, that all demographic groups voted for Trump… while very casually dropping “more than before” but giving the idea that Trump got a hige majority of the votes! 😵💫
Piers is widly sneaky and dishonest. Americans genuinely shouldnt go on this show as he simply indulges this internet eetish of pitting Americans from different political aisles to scream at each other. He profits from the divisions in our country.
What do you mean, he's saying what actually happened, Trump got an increase in votes from all those groups more than has ever happened, like half of the Hispanic vote, which is wild. How is it disingenuous when you're assuming things on top of what he said?
Just want to mention here that the thumbnail gives the impression that it was a panel with Destiny in it. The editor should avoid such deceptive thumbnails as it'll affect D's credibility.
I just hate Piers Morgan's show. I never feel like I'm more educated about anything. It's always just far too many people talking over each other to get any comprehensible ideas out.
I wish Brianna Wu would skip the foreplay and get into her mask off rightoid grift already. Its really tiring watching her enter every conversation as 'trans person on the left' and then immediately use herself as a shield for the right, or join in with the right. We've seen the act before, you're sitting next to Dave Rubin ffs, can we skip this part? Its so boring. I hate when they pretend for like a year straight.
"So... I feel a little conflicted about everything, but part of me is happy you're in the family... I can't call you Dad yet, but who knows what the future holds!" "Gotcha, anything else?"
@@Old_Jack_Ketch have you seen his fake reactionary reaction slop content recently .destroyed , humiliated and other kinds of rubbish with 10 second intro of his
She's always been cringe, during her game journalism days, AFTER she renounced that shit, and now this -- she just sucks up to whatever social circle she wants to appeal to at any given point. She actually did it to this community, too -- and will abandon the ideas she shared here when she jumps to her next circle.
@NoName-x5o 100% agree. Wu might say something that is correct from time to time but is always part of a tactic. She is very good at sniffing the wind changing. She did it 10 years ago when she got in the early woke push and now that she has been expelled by the monster she helped popularize she is trying to get in the new trend.
Saying something is "a foot note" is just an idiom people use to mean "of lesser or little significance to", ie., "all western philosophy is merely a footnote to Plato". And regardless of how or when you think people should use it, this is clearly how Pakman was using it.
You are 1000% correct but don't ever ever EVER waste your time explaining to these disgusting creatures again. They know what it means and they're playing a game. This the quote from Sartre that Destiny often reads about anti-Semites playing out in real time
I despise these conversations so much because it's not like the presidency has really anything to do with these sports organizations that are the ones that make the standards. It seems like an insane overstep of government to make some kind of executive action banning certain types of sports leagues from including who they want. I think liberals should stay on this point a lot more that it is insane that this is even a political issue in the first place.
If I was Dave I would have hammered that point more. They claim Biden passed a bunch of legislation about this but they don't point to anything but a chimp clip & that trans flags exist.
Ye people need to grow up and accept that alot of these issues are state or local. There are no federal trans issues, besides like random trans people in the military stuff.
I love watching destiny be exasperated because he doesn't understand the point being made. great content. I'm pretty sure what Pakman's point was, is that the claim about trans people taking 1000 medals from women if you look into the footnote the source is a comment from some gender critical organization rather than actual statistics. The line put in the report came from a UN open request for comments rather than say someone doing actual research on medals. The footnote for the medal claim is literally just some organization's recommendations rather than hard data. So it's stupid that people like pier's are referring to it because that just shows they didn't look into it past the absolute surface level. The UN report doesn't do any fact checking or gathering they just blindly put in the line from the request for comments hearing him argue with chat over something pakman wasn't even trying to say made me lose braincells. Pakman wasn't saying it was a footnote to undermine it he was saying it was a footnote because the source for that claim isn't even included in the report. I know this because I spent too much time looking into this the other day because twitter crazies like bringing it up as a gotcha. Because the UN says X is a good talking point.
What i need to see is Dave Rubin, that other idiot with the blue blazer, medhi hasan and destiny on one panel. Let it be uncensored and as long as it needs to be.
Yea when i watched this Uncensored ep. I also looked up the source and concluded: The source that actually counted each case (google "she won") says 900 medals over the last 23 years all over the world for 29 sports! about ~50% of which in track and field and ~40% in Disc golf. How many millions of medals were awarded in the last 23 years? it's less than 0.001% of all medals. This is a non-issue cooked up by conservatives.
The whole “trans issue” is so easily debunked by 10 minutes of research. I wanna call it Trans Derangement Syndrome but that name could be misconstrued lmao
When talking about the trans issue: look at this quote from Kamala in 2019! Look at what she said in 2019! When talking about J6: im not going to litigate the past, we’re moving forward and thinking about the future
3:00 This business model of 'I'll have a moron on my show to utter moronics, & subsequently have decent people come on my show to clean up the mess the moron left behind' is so incredibly degenerate. It's analogous to owning shares in the most unhealthy donuts & shares in funeral homes & coffins.
I would argue Pakmans lighting is better on the basis of the hair light and the contrast in his lighting vs the background. These combined help to seperate him from the background where as Rueben lacks separation despite the depth of field. I personally feel people over value shallow focus, but just look at his hair, it’s way too flat. Pakman could use some negative fill, as it seems like he is using a three point lighting setup but his studio space likely has a lot of surfaces bouncing it back in and filling his shadow side.
If the goal is to truly protect women, focus on taking meaningful action against domestic violence. Not that trans women in sport topic... Why? Just look into the numbers. Domestic violence is a way bigger problem.
Most anti trans arguments are rooted in misogyny Which also affects women Because obviously if you foster an environment where misogyny is seen as okay it harms them Domestic violence is definitely an issue But if we are able to change how people perceive women that would also help women immensely and would help deal with domestic violence Which I think is an interesting way to look at it But obviously they don’t see it that way because it’s purely an issue almost no one actually cares about and if they do it’s because they already hate trans people and are looking for arguments to hurt them
Imagine the mental damage when he opens his mouth to talk about the deporter in chief for the millionth time. How can you respond if you have to vomit both from his bs talking points as well as disgusting odor 😮
I'll just say that many of the conservatives in my extended family ARE very freaked out by trans activism generally and trans activism in schools in particular. If you ask on a poll if people care about trans issues, they might say 'no' thinking it indicates that they are not overly empathetic for that demo and are thereby not aligned with trans activism (I'd need to look up the poll). Lots of scared Christian moms out there thinking they're grooming their kids etc. I think anyone saying that no one cares about trans activism must not know very many "normal" conservative people. Either that or my anecdote is highly unusual. At my place of work, two male coworkers mentioned that ad and were making fun of dems for having such crazy takes. Also, the "economy" was way more important to everyone. You ask the average person if the economy is doing well, they don't think about GDP, they think about how far their dollar goes and how many dollars they are depositing in their bank each pay day. As a general rule, if we want to win elections, we need to stop calling rural people idiots for not understanding the economy (or anything else for that matter). The social issues probably just need to get transmogrified into a broad class based social safety net. That would be really popular.
The avg rural voters is like that lady complaining about her husband driving to a oil rig that fired him while her republican governor steals donated money from poor kids to fund his daughters sports stuff... all these ends up with is them blaming democrats. You can't call them dumb (they can call you whatever they want) You can't correct them (you admit they aren't smart enough to understand it) Your only option is to pander to them even if they're wrong. They don't believe in handouts that's not going to work.
Trans people are less than 5% of the population. I know numbers are hard to understand for conservatives but that is literally not affecting you or your conservative family in the slightest
@@powerlung2631Trans people are less than 0.5% of the US population, not 5%. Which is why Democrats shouldn't be chasing thousands of votes at the cost of millions.
@@tarfielarchelone2674Either pander to them like Obama did and win elections, or pander to a group of people so small as to actually be insignificant and let those ignorant rural people run our country off a cliff.
00:00:00 Intro 00:04:12 Panel of white dudes 00:04:31 Pierce wants to talk about transgenders 00:06:21 David Pakman debunks Pierce 00:13:33 Republicans made it an issue 00:22:55 Brianna Wu joins the panel 00:28:48 Well-funded evil money machine 00:30:47 Destiny investigates 00:49:50 We figured out how dishonest you were 01:00:56 Pierce wants to talk about woke 01:03:00 This is what republicans exploit 01:03:59 Destiny explains 01:11:26 They hijacked our movement 01:13:34 Destiny investigates 01:22:06 Ben searches for trans news 01:28:33 Dave Ruben deflects 01:32:25 D.O.G.E. 01:33:54 Daves Ruben predictions 01:34:55 New tone for Trump 01:52:47 Pierce panders to Trump
Brianna had some, real weird points. I think she's correct on a perception problem, that the wacky far left/extreme progressive positions still get tied to Dems, including Kamala and used as a straw man AND they could be more effective at distancing/disavowing/pivoting away from it(instead trying to be non offensive). BUT Brianna said non binary Hamas supporters had kamala's ear? Like in reality? It's a perception of policy/platform problem not an actual policy/platform problem. Kamala should've come out saying those statements weren't her policy(not even necessarily because of trans stuff BUT in the US, people generally don't like giving things that could ever arguably be unnecessary to prisoners who have been convicted of crimes that the non prisoner population doesn't have immediate access to). I think, similar to a lot of people, Brianna is taking her anecdotal experience as evidence that the Trumpist propaganda is true broadly when actually, the fact that she encounters so many people like this has to just do with the specific space/community/medium she operates within. Before jordan Peterson went full crazy, I always thought this was his issue as well, existing on a very left elite college campus would expose you to the furthest reaches of left leaning positions all the time, which in actuality have no power and control over the broader Democratic party.
Bro, farmers in the midwest talk about how much they hate trans issues because it's on Disney+. It's talked about more than the abortion issue by normies and all normies hate it.
Why aren't they just saying Harris position is she'll follow the law. That's what her answr was when asked about the issue in an interview. Which is exactly what you want to hear. The president has to follow the law.
This might be one of the most important videos destiny has made. I think he is perfectly captuing a lot of our cultural, educational and political issues we currently face. At around the 1 hour mark destiny explains the concept of magnitude in claims. Ive heard destiny use language like "conviction" of a claim. Such as "i have like 10% conviction on this claim". Hes telegraphing the concept he talks about here with magnatide. I have been telling people that the problem we have isnt "facts", its "weight" of facts or magnatude as destiny says here. We need to work on sharpening peoples scales so they can better "weigh" in claims! This and veritasiums recent video about political bias also clouds peoples minds.
Wrestler here: Women are great wrestlers. The ones I've seen always won through technical victories. They would gather up a lot of points by breaking out of holds or by escaping. I personally never saw a straight up pin to win strat. Again women are great wrestlers. It take more effort to win via an accumulation of points than it is through a straight up pin. It takes endurance and a clear head. Keep kicking ass ladies!
Always surprises me how Tiny can research complex topics and in a matter of weeks get knowledgeable enough to debate experts - while also not knowing very basic things like the fact that different citation styles use footnotes differently, with many using them exclusively as supplementary info and short comments.
Destiny doesn’t know where like half the US states are on a map. He’s really knowledgeable about a handful of topics and straight dogshit on others. Like stuff that any middle schooler should know. How many times have you seen him struggle to pronounce a word that you learned in like 8th grade?
I think he’s saying that portion of the UN report is just regurgitated information from an anti-trans source (ie footnote), rather than a salient finding. He took issue with Pierce framing the quote as a conclusion of the UN report, when the portion he was reading was just “a footnote”. He phrase it like that to emphasise this.
Trans women in sports was never the issue. Every state that has banned trans women in sports has gone on to push for anti-trans legislation since then, including bathroom bounties. It was never about protecting women's sports. It's about getting a foot in the door for regressive policy changes.
Well of course It’s a contrived issue that almost no one actually cares about and if they do it’s because they already hate trans people and are looking for arguments to hurt them
The problem is if you think there is no issue with trans women competing with women, it doesnt matter if people care about the issue that much, it makes you look absolutely divorced from reality if you dont accept the evident issues with it.
11:00 The question in response to Piers should've been, "you've shown us a Trump ad that claims the Dems are pro-Trans and claims that it is bad, but can you show me a single Kamala ad that says she is pro-Trans? Is it the case that the Democrats ran an incredibly pro-Trans campaign, or did the Republicans just run an incredibly anti-Trans campaign and you are conflating the two?"
I think the point of Pakman describing the UN trans statement as a footnote was that it wasn't research by the UN but rather just sourcing some sus source, like destiny agrees. I agree though that Pakman isn't stating it clearly and of course Piers also has no idea what's going on. Which makes these conversations very funny as a fellow autistic person that likes to really delve deep into things before making any kind of statement that these guys can just yell at each other without having any clue lol
True, if Pakman is going to go that hard he needs to quote the sourcing and explain the research/lack there of. For anyone not familiar with him they will instantly dismiss that as partisan hackery. And not admitting an ounce of truth of the relevance of the issue despite what pew pools say. He’s on pierces show. It’s going to be on balance viewed by ppl that hear about this issue all the time. Like it or not, this is one of the few issues Kamala actually looked bad with her policies. Despite this oversight, in a blind pool she had the more popular policy platform.
Piers: I was appalled by what the guest I brought on the show was saying. Also Piers: Allows such commentary to continue functionally unabated. Also also Piers: Is uncomfortable with people calling him out for the consequences of his behavior
Wu has no loyalty so she can’t betray anyone. Wu does whatever it takes, takes any position, cozies up to any social circle, in order to stay relevant.
My favorite destiny clips are when he's going against andrew wilson and gets absolutely demolished so bad he starts sperging out and everyone around just starts laughing at him 😂 He's like the Neil Breen of debating
@@za-ir5ni It's frustrating because it comes from a good foundation - we should try to build bridges with people who disagree with us. The problem right now is that the right are playing by a completely different ruleset than us and every olive branch we offer them is seen as a sign of weakness.
@LeftistMuslimGynocracy welcome to what the right has been saying about the left for years now the fact people still act like you all arnt different sides of the same coin is insane to me
To answer the question which Republicans oppose other Republicans, Matt gaetz is being scrutinized by many of his own side. Don't act like it don't happen to both sides destiny.
Rueben’s hair specifically blends in to the dark parts of the marble if you look at his left our right. If his background was lighter it wouldn’t matter as much, and you could argue Pakmans right our left is too dark, as his key is likely pretty close and has a single diffusion. But overall his is better. A cool background with a warm key and no odd shadows
I'm a lifelong dem, was a bernie voter, but after bernie's failure and the ramping up of identity politics on the left, I've started voting red. My biggest driver at the poll is anti identity politics, not just the big T issue, but race relations as well. And there's MILLIONS of voters like me. I've heard countless stories of "why I left the left" or "I didn't leave the left, the left left me". You never hear that from the other side. So obviously people DO care about this stuff, and it's literally restructuring the political landscape. And maybe I'm a big dum dum who's been brainwashed by propaganda. Well, either way, the left is losing support because of it. So idk figure something out. If people like me aren't objectively right about what's going on, it's irrelevant, we're still leaving your side, so figure something out. Put out better propaganda. Or open your eyes and realize we're right. Do something.
You are literally a big dummy. There’s no actual way to appeal to you that progresses or improves anything. You don’t vote on issues that matter; you vote on issues that are irrelevant to pretty much all policy, AND you don’t seem to have much of an explanation here for doing so. Maybe the option is reinstitution some test to vote that may weed folks like you out; a simple literacy test might actually work here
@Ariana-zr2cr the entire premise. We should structure society on merit, and judging people by the content of one's character, not any part of their immutable identity. I view modern leftist identitarians the same as any far right white supremacist. In fact, they ARE the same. White supremacy IS identity politics, it just centers white people, whereas modern leftists pretty much invert that and center anything that's not a historically privileged class. They're both morally repugnant. I'll vote for any republican who is against identity politics before I vote for an identitarian leftist, even if I agree with the leftist on all the economic stuff (as I do support things like m4a, tuition free college, etc).
@DavidJones-ot8qu that wouldn't work because any test you could construct, I would pass. I'm college educated and I score in the 97th percentile of tests. So even if the test wasn't just straight up facts which I would know, I'm smart enough and good at testing such that I could manipulate my way through passing it. You want to say I'm dum dum but I'm actually not, sorry.
so let me get this straight. Piers spends 5 minutes addressing the white suprematism of his last guest, being appalled, disavowing etc, only to immediately say, when pivoting to his current guests " what a magnificent panel of white dudes". The subtext is astounding.
Rubin says "you had the entire cultural machine - all of Hollywood, all of Music (...)" Did he ever wonder how is it, that like 90% of artists of any kind are left-leaning and liberal? Far higher than "educated people vs uneducated" or any other metric for any social group you want to check. Why is that Dave?! WHY IS THAT?!?
Kinda dumb that we are pulling hairs on a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of the entire population playing sports... The fact that anyone would get into the weeds about it instead of dismissing it in 5 mins is proof "someone" is overblowing this issue.
Destiny is right about the citations thing. Let’s say you have a story about Bob leaving his house to buy some eggs. You have three articles that go over the event. Let’s label them citations [1] [2] & [3]. Citation [1] talks about him when he is already at the story and buying the eggs and going back home, but not getting to the store. Citation [2{ talks about him going to the store and buy the eggs but not getting back home. Citation [3] talks about him going to the story and going back home with the eggs but not the time he spent at the store buying the eggs. You would cite it something like this: Bob left his house at 13:00. He had a leisurely walk and arrived at the store without incident [2][3]. He browsed through the store for a time until he reached the egg section. He picked up a dozen eggs and walked them to the cash where he promptly paid for them [1][2]. Bob left the store with a dozen eggs in hand and walked back home without incident [1][3]. That way you can have multiple sources to collaborate the same event in its entirety without having a source that discusses everything you want to address. What the UN report did was sloppy citations and it makes it look like there was more incidents than there actually were.
When you say "it's just a footnote" what you're actually saying usually is that it's unimportant to the overall thing you're discussing. Pakman kind of shot himself in the leg when he said that Piers is disingenuous because it's a footnote, but then later redeems himself by saying "look at the source". Because what he was actually talking about is where did the study get its data. And like, fine, I guess. But nevertheless I don't think we should be ever this hasty to dismiss a UN report. Because where are we supposed to go check the data? The UN seems like an obvious source. So, it's one thing to criticize a specific report with facts and data, and it's another to brush something off as a footnote or whatever.
david pakman was trying to say that the source listed in that un report regarding the medals lost was bogus (submission from 'women's liberation front')
Destiny is starting to sputter out 🤣 dude has an entitlement problem. How dare anyone be smarter than me, and how dare you not believe everything I say because I read it off Wikipedia...... Your wiki says you have been pegged multiple times destiny, so is wiki all facts or mostly lies?
But he doesn't read mostly off Wikipedia. He reads primary sources like he did in this video. But you clearly didn't watch it before responding to a version of Destiny that you have in your mind...
Hate Towards White Men And Problem w/ DEI Hire
►ruclips.net/video/VZD-Bq9rktc/видео.html
Don't act like a saint you hypocrite. Everyone knows you believe in DEI & are a sellout shill for leftwing lying media.
Did you run away during debate with Christian Prince? I saw in his channel, but it didn't sound like you at all.
If the goal is to truly protect women, focus on taking meaningful action against domestic violence. Not that trans women in sport topic... Why? Just look into the numbers. Domestic violence is a way bigger problem.
Sign - Petition for the Release of Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report
@@markuss-n5ilook into which demographics have the highest rate of domestic violence and then you will know why democrats do not touch this issue.
Dave Rubin should not be allowed to escape calls of Russian funding, wherever he goes.
All left leaning pundits should immediately call it out on any panel, kudos to Pakman for doing so.
Isn't he innocent?
@@WL1264 no lmao? he was literally one of the people alongside tim pool, benny johnson, lauren southern who were taking money from tenet media something like $10m total. The only question would be on if they were knowingly taking russian money, the girl who connected them all together is indicted alongside her husband
@@shortneckedgiraffe8018 they had no idea that the money was from Russia. There's no proof that they started to change their minds on anything, especially regarding Russia and Ukraine. So it's unfair to call them stuff like Russian puppets n shit.
@@shortneckedgiraffe8018 Lauren Chen is who’s indicted
@@WL1264Do you agree if you’re a parent and your 16 year old is somehow making the $1000 a week, that it might be ok to be a little superstitious of where that money comes from? And to counter your other point on, “well they didn’t change their opinions!”, you think its a little weird the Russians funded only Conservative pundits like this and not people like David, Brian, Destiny, etc?
It is time for Piers to invite Destiny and Hasan on at once without telling each other just to see what happens
😂😂😂
That'd be interesting.
Piers doesn't care about leftist infighting if it doesn't serve any conservative goals of making Democrats look bad.
Showing a staunch liberal like Destiny fully denouncing a far leftist like Hasan, destroys the idea that the Democrats are the party of the "extreme left".
I thought we were done with testing nuclear weapons?!
Hasan would shit himself
I remember when Ben Shapiro said he didnt respect Rubins marriage to his face lol
and Ann Coulter told Vivek she wouldn't vote for him cause he's brown.
A rare Ben W, even if he's disrespectful for wrong reasons, ya gotta admit him for being blunt.
@@danielsurvivor1372 literally no clearer example of a Ben L
@@lewisbirkett4428It's a Ben W because I hate Rubin
@@rtreykcult mentality bro.
Dave: How dare you say I took Russian money.
Also Dave: Took Kremlin money
Lol he also was the only one they dropped because they soon figured out he wasn't worth the money spent. If that's not pitiful idk what is.
@@jloiben12 unknowingly*
@@candyhandsjf7288
I think that makes the point even more embarrassing
@@jloiben12 i disagree
@@candyhandsjf7288yes you’re right, he’s just a very useful idiot
Man Piers plays completely one side in these discussions. He interrupts the liberals and lets conservatives talk over them. Then tells the liberal guests to yield their time to the conservatives so they can respond. It really is a good example of how the left lets conservatives act badly but will remain polite, relying on rules and civility to work it out. If you are the only one playing by the rules and theres no consequence to the other side breaking them then you are giving up, plain and simple
Yeah I don't understand the situation here. The Republicans pundits get to yammer on and on while brian and David keep getting interrupted every time they speak a word
He's a joke. What's to get? He's not a serious person.
And then he brings on another conservative mid show. That's what gets me he pretends like it's 2v2 when really it's 2v4.
Piers is such a good boy; his evidence for Democrats being turbo woke during this campaign is Trump's campaign video that shows a clip from Harris 2019 interview.
A clip from a Harris interview where she reiterates the law under Trump lmao
But what trump said years ago is fair game
Piers is genuinely one of the most ridiculous people around
@@hunterherndon8573fuck do u mean fair game? Nothing is fair game, Trump could’ve fondled an orphanage on camera and the right would’ve still voted him in.
@Collabcreatemarketing just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it's not a big issue. A lot of video games don't even have male or female they have body type 1 and body type 2.
Remember when Kamala made trans issues the central part of her campaign, nah, me neither. Trans member of the panel voted for the Leopards Ate My Face party.
What's even more messed up is the majority of ttans people today are FTM or Female to non binary. Conservatives only talk about them in reference to mastectomy. Never any other mention of them.
What is the leopards ate my face reference?
@@Kloutkulture Meaning people taking actions that end up biting them in the ass. In this case, voting against their own interests
@@morphkogan8627 thank you
Wait ain't no way, did Wu vote for Trump? 😮
Piers Morgan: Get off the trans issue, people don't want to hear it anymore, it's why you're losing!
Also Piers Morgan: Let's talk about the trans issue and nothing else on my show today! People definitely don't want to hear about it and I'm definitely not farming views right now!
Prettty sure he brought up that he said it means nothing to the election and THEN was telling them to get off the topic no? Not the other way around.
@@KromodenI’m 7:44 in and Piers has quite literally just stated the opposite (as in people do care/voted on the trans issue) so either you’ve misinterpreted that or he completely flips his talking point in minutes depending on which supports his arguement (frankly, I suspect the second)
@@marcus5977 1:21:30
Ok but nobody wants to hear about coomers in dresses anymore. Literally no one.
@@marcus5977he flips everytime he loses are argument or the side he agrees with loses an argument. Then he acts like hes right before switching to the next topic even when hes obviously not. I get why england got rid of him.
Piers keeps asserting, on a purposefully disingenuous way, that all demographic groups voted for Trump… while very casually dropping “more than before” but giving the idea that Trump got a hige majority of the votes! 😵💫
I mean he improved in every demographic and won the popular vote by a landslide
Yeah this narrative trump won by a landslide is just factually wrong. Less than 700,000 votes in key states and Kamala ends up winning.
Piers is widly sneaky and dishonest. Americans genuinely shouldnt go on this show as he simply indulges this internet eetish of pitting Americans from different political aisles to scream at each other. He profits from the divisions in our country.
He's extremely dishonest and obnoxious
What do you mean, he's saying what actually happened, Trump got an increase in votes from all those groups more than has ever happened, like half of the Hispanic vote, which is wild. How is it disingenuous when you're assuming things on top of what he said?
I love David Pakman. The jab when Dave Rubin was talking about funding XDDD
Just want to mention here that the thumbnail gives the impression that it was a panel with Destiny in it. The editor should avoid such deceptive thumbnails as it'll affect D's credibility.
@@TheKomentor i agree
@@TheKomentor i didnt think that when looking at the thumbnail, it's pretty clear
I don't know. It felt to me like Pakman was slimy and dishonest in this conversation.
@@yojou3695 Maybe the title or thumbnail can have a "Destiny Reacts" in it so the viewer knows exactly what he is clicking into.
Pakman missed the golden opportunity to pin Rubin on the phrase “then pay it back, or you are a traitor”
like he shud to isreal
Because its a good argument or because rubin has used the phrase before? I feel like this is a reference to something I'm missing
@ its a good argument
@@WorkerAnt_101 its a reference to Rubin taking russian money LOL
I like that they don't like Pakman talk for more than 30 seconds at a time. Makes for really good debate!
And then complain that he monopolized the time 😂
Didn't even matter that much. He's so quick with the rebuttals.
Yall have truly lost it
@@kyle-mb1ijnot as much as drug addicted Elon the deadbeat father
@@kyle-mb1ijgood substantial critique! You're not a real person.
I just hate Piers Morgan's show. I never feel like I'm more educated about anything. It's always just far too many people talking over each other to get any comprehensible ideas out.
You get all your facts from 'The View'😂
Dave Rubinski is a snowflake all of a sudden lol
Dave Ruble*
Dave rubenstein kapo comrade
Rave Dubin
I wish Brianna Wu would skip the foreplay and get into her mask off rightoid grift already. Its really tiring watching her enter every conversation as 'trans person on the left' and then immediately use herself as a shield for the right, or join in with the right. We've seen the act before, you're sitting next to Dave Rubin ffs, can we skip this part? Its so boring. I hate when they pretend for like a year straight.
Brianna Wu’s whole grift has been to try and stay relevant since Gamergate. Doesn’t matter what she has to do or say.
You mean HIM?
@@yupimawesome Don't be a asshole just because Wu's being stupid.
Never heard of him but soon as i heard them talking i knew it was just another yapping grifter lmaooo.
@@yupimawesome no they ment her. Get over it.
Hi mom, hope Mr. Bonelli is taking good care of you!
"So... I feel a little conflicted about everything, but part of me is happy you're in the family... I can't call you Dad yet, but who knows what the future holds!"
"Gotcha, anything else?"
@@Narcissistic_Penguin "... Want to appear on my anything else podcast?"- Destiny
Bro 😂
Rave dubin is so unbelievably stupid to even realize that no one with his talent would get millions of dollars to put out his content
I really think he's dumb enough to honestly believe he's a media genius.
@@Old_Jack_Ketch have you seen his fake reactionary reaction slop content recently .destroyed , humiliated and other kinds of rubbish with 10 second intro of his
@@VARMOT123
Getting ‘destroyed’ by Rave Dubin is like watching a monkey beat itself over the head with a wet newspaper.
Sucks how Wu through Pakman and BTC under the bus - when they were there just responding to Morgan’s Trans prompt. Bad look
Yeah, she definitely was giving"I am not one of those" vibes 😮
Yes, she came across as a useful idiot by giving Dave Rubin ammunition to attack BTC and Packman.
You can't argue that she isn't correct about what she said.
She's always been cringe, during her game journalism days, AFTER she renounced that shit, and now this -- she just sucks up to whatever social circle she wants to appeal to at any given point. She actually did it to this community, too -- and will abandon the ideas she shared here when she jumps to her next circle.
@NoName-x5o 100% agree. Wu might say something that is correct from time to time but is always part of a tactic. She is very good at sniffing the wind changing. She did it 10 years ago when she got in the early woke push and now that she has been expelled by the monster she helped popularize she is trying to get in the new trend.
David "The Pak" Pakman, the First. Absolutely cooking!
The nickname is "D-Pak"
The real super PAC
Piers fact checked him and he got humiliated during this panel
Destiny talks about lighting the same way Vaush talks about men's fashion
'Queerly'
And both are cringe as fuck LMAO especially Vaush
Vaush talks about liking kids*
WOOOAAAH--
@@rushpatriot2866 "goblin short stacks"
Saying something is "a foot note" is just an idiom people use to mean "of lesser or little significance to", ie., "all western philosophy is merely a footnote to Plato". And regardless of how or when you think people should use it, this is clearly how Pakman was using it.
You are 1000% correct but don't ever ever EVER waste your time explaining to these disgusting creatures again. They know what it means and they're playing a game. This the quote from Sartre that Destiny often reads about anti-Semites playing out in real time
I despise these conversations so much because it's not like the presidency has really anything to do with these sports organizations that are the ones that make the standards. It seems like an insane overstep of government to make some kind of executive action banning certain types of sports leagues from including who they want. I think liberals should stay on this point a lot more that it is insane that this is even a political issue in the first place.
If I was Dave I would have hammered that point more. They claim Biden passed a bunch of legislation about this but they don't point to anything but a chimp clip & that trans flags exist.
Ye people need to grow up and accept that alot of these issues are state or local. There are no federal trans issues, besides like random trans people in the military stuff.
ultra confused when people think the president will determen if it will become more woke or not. Did it not become more woke between 2017 and 2021?
That "Kent Hovind from wish" guy is so frustrating
I love watching destiny be exasperated because he doesn't understand the point being made. great content.
I'm pretty sure what Pakman's point was, is that the claim about trans people taking 1000 medals from women if you look into the footnote the source is a comment from some gender critical organization rather than actual statistics. The line put in the report came from a UN open request for comments rather than say someone doing actual research on medals. The footnote for the medal claim is literally just some organization's recommendations rather than hard data. So it's stupid that people like pier's are referring to it because that just shows they didn't look into it past the absolute surface level. The UN report doesn't do any fact checking or gathering they just blindly put in the line from the request for comments
hearing him argue with chat over something pakman wasn't even trying to say made me lose braincells. Pakman wasn't saying it was a footnote to undermine it he was saying it was a footnote because the source for that claim isn't even included in the report. I know this because I spent too much time looking into this the other day because twitter crazies like bringing it up as a gotcha. Because the UN says X is a good talking point.
What i need to see is Dave Rubin, that other idiot with the blue blazer, medhi hasan and destiny on one panel. Let it be uncensored and as long as it needs to be.
Literally as long as it needs to be 😂
And no Piers Morgan. He's the worst moderator in existence.
@fredriksk21 hes a participant with moderator power
Brian wearing a hoody on piers when he wears a suit everywhere else and he’s the only one who didn’t smile when introduced 😂😂😂
For context, he's been like that since after election day, at least on his channel. I like it
Common Dave Rubin L
Yea when i watched this Uncensored ep. I also looked up the source and concluded: The source that actually counted each case (google "she won") says 900 medals over the last 23 years all over the world for 29 sports! about ~50% of which in track and field and ~40% in Disc golf.
How many millions of medals were awarded in the last 23 years? it's less than 0.001% of all medals. This is a non-issue cooked up by conservatives.
and even if it was an issue it would be an issue for each and every separate sport to decide on, not something politicians should decide
The whole “trans issue” is so easily debunked by 10 minutes of research. I wanna call it Trans Derangement Syndrome but that name could be misconstrued lmao
Rubin calling anyone smug is rich
When talking about the trans issue: look at this quote from Kamala in 2019! Look at what she said in 2019!
When talking about J6: im not going to litigate the past, we’re moving forward and thinking about the future
3:00 This business model of 'I'll have a moron on my show to utter moronics, & subsequently have decent people come on my show to clean up the mess the moron left behind' is so incredibly degenerate. It's analogous to owning shares in the most unhealthy donuts & shares in funeral homes & coffins.
I would argue Pakmans lighting is better on the basis of the hair light and the contrast in his lighting vs the background. These combined help to seperate him from the background where as Rueben lacks separation despite the depth of field. I personally feel people over value shallow focus, but just look at his hair, it’s way too flat. Pakman could use some negative fill, as it seems like he is using a three point lighting setup but his studio space likely has a lot of surfaces bouncing it back in and filling his shadow side.
If the goal is to truly protect women, focus on taking meaningful action against domestic violence. Not that trans women in sport topic... Why? Just look into the numbers. Domestic violence is a way bigger problem.
They love that domestic violence. That’s why they want to get rid of no-fault divorce
Most anti trans arguments are rooted in misogyny
Which also affects women
Because obviously if you foster an environment where misogyny is seen as okay it harms them
Domestic violence is definitely an issue
But if we are able to change how people perceive women that would also help women immensely and would help deal with domestic violence
Which I think is an interesting way to look at it
But obviously they don’t see it that way because it’s purely an issue almost no one actually cares about and if they do it’s because they already hate trans people and are looking for arguments to hurt them
David was saying the source that the footnote refers to is a bad source. So using that source to support their claim is bad.
Piers Morgan looks like he has bad breath
Imagine the mental damage when he opens his mouth to talk about the deporter in chief for the millionth time. How can you respond if you have to vomit both from his bs talking points as well as disgusting odor 😮
Piers smells like the Predators dreadlocks let’s be honest.
Bro smells like the Nightcrawler after he teleports.
I bet swamp ass for us is regular ass for him.
Random comment for the day.
That Argentinian jew is quick. Way too fast for Russki Ricky Rubin.
Dan Bilzerian? Lmao that guy gets stranger and stranger.
It's a shame that Brianna Wu is now pulling the contrarian shtick.
I'll just say that many of the conservatives in my extended family ARE very freaked out by trans activism generally and trans activism in schools in particular. If you ask on a poll if people care about trans issues, they might say 'no' thinking it indicates that they are not overly empathetic for that demo and are thereby not aligned with trans activism (I'd need to look up the poll). Lots of scared Christian moms out there thinking they're grooming their kids etc. I think anyone saying that no one cares about trans activism must not know very many "normal" conservative people. Either that or my anecdote is highly unusual. At my place of work, two male coworkers mentioned that ad and were making fun of dems for having such crazy takes.
Also, the "economy" was way more important to everyone. You ask the average person if the economy is doing well, they don't think about GDP, they think about how far their dollar goes and how many dollars they are depositing in their bank each pay day. As a general rule, if we want to win elections, we need to stop calling rural people idiots for not understanding the economy (or anything else for that matter). The social issues probably just need to get transmogrified into a broad class based social safety net. That would be really popular.
The avg rural voters is like that lady complaining about her husband driving to a oil rig that fired him while her republican governor steals donated money from poor kids to fund his daughters sports stuff... all these ends up with is them blaming democrats.
You can't call them dumb (they can call you whatever they want)
You can't correct them (you admit they aren't smart enough to understand it)
Your only option is to pander to them even if they're wrong.
They don't believe in handouts that's not going to work.
Trans people are less than 5% of the population. I know numbers are hard to understand for conservatives but that is literally not affecting you or your conservative family in the slightest
@@powerlung2631Trans people are less than 0.5% of the US population, not 5%. Which is why Democrats shouldn't be chasing thousands of votes at the cost of millions.
@@tarfielarchelone2674Either pander to them like Obama did and win elections, or pander to a group of people so small as to actually be insignificant and let those ignorant rural people run our country off a cliff.
00:00:00 Intro
00:04:12 Panel of white dudes
00:04:31 Pierce wants to talk about transgenders
00:06:21 David Pakman debunks Pierce
00:13:33 Republicans made it an issue
00:22:55 Brianna Wu joins the panel
00:28:48 Well-funded evil money machine
00:30:47 Destiny investigates
00:49:50 We figured out how dishonest you were
01:00:56 Pierce wants to talk about woke
01:03:00 This is what republicans exploit
01:03:59 Destiny explains
01:11:26 They hijacked our movement
01:13:34 Destiny investigates
01:22:06 Ben searches for trans news
01:28:33 Dave Ruben deflects
01:32:25 D.O.G.E.
01:33:54 Daves Ruben predictions
01:34:55 New tone for Trump
01:52:47 Pierce panders to Trump
Brianna had some, real weird points.
I think she's correct on a perception problem, that the wacky far left/extreme progressive positions still get tied to Dems, including Kamala and used as a straw man AND they could be more effective at distancing/disavowing/pivoting away from it(instead trying to be non offensive).
BUT Brianna said non binary Hamas supporters had kamala's ear? Like in reality? It's a perception of policy/platform problem not an actual policy/platform problem. Kamala should've come out saying those statements weren't her policy(not even necessarily because of trans stuff BUT in the US, people generally don't like giving things that could ever arguably be unnecessary to prisoners who have been convicted of crimes that the non prisoner population doesn't have immediate access to).
I think, similar to a lot of people, Brianna is taking her anecdotal experience as evidence that the Trumpist propaganda is true broadly when actually, the fact that she encounters so many people like this has to just do with the specific space/community/medium she operates within. Before jordan Peterson went full crazy, I always thought this was his issue as well, existing on a very left elite college campus would expose you to the furthest reaches of left leaning positions all the time, which in actuality have no power and control over the broader Democratic party.
yeah no lmao kamala doesn't care about nb people, or palestinians. The online left gets ignored by the irl democrats
Bro, farmers in the midwest talk about how much they hate trans issues because it's on Disney+. It's talked about more than the abortion issue by normies and all normies hate it.
Brianna wu's v tuber filter fucking cracks me up everytime 😂
Destiny: "Fuck that, I'm not here to get a medical degree."
Destiny 5 seconds later: deep-diving on the medical condition
5:42 “Tramp”… bit of a Freudian slip there, Piers? 😂
The traitors are crying about being caught being traitors
Yeah, the right cries hysterical tears when shown what traitors they are for trying to overthrow democracy on Jan 6th😂
how was he not wrong, it was irrelevant it had no bearing on the result, despite what piers implies
When they crop the sides Rubin's background looks like sears portrait studio... all I can think of is Step Brothers.
Why aren't they just saying Harris position is she'll follow the law. That's what her answr was when asked about the issue in an interview. Which is exactly what you want to hear. The president has to follow the law.
Every single time I hear Piers Morgan speak I gain a bit more respect for Jeremy Clarkson
This might be one of the most important videos destiny has made. I think he is perfectly captuing a lot of our cultural, educational and political issues we currently face. At around the 1 hour mark destiny explains the concept of magnitude in claims. Ive heard destiny use language like "conviction" of a claim. Such as "i have like 10% conviction on this claim". Hes telegraphing the concept he talks about here with magnatide. I have been telling people that the problem we have isnt "facts", its "weight" of facts or magnatude as destiny says here. We need to work on sharpening peoples scales so they can better "weigh" in claims! This and veritasiums recent video about political bias also clouds peoples minds.
The rights pretty much, at this point, the ONLY People who bring up trans issues.
Something something. He fell off bro
this is just as unfunny as the last time i’ve seen it
Damn, Brianna Wu sounds noticeably more right wing compared to just seven months ago.
Wrestler here:
Women are great wrestlers.
The ones I've seen always won through technical victories.
They would gather up a lot of points by breaking out of holds or by escaping.
I personally never saw a straight up pin to win strat.
Again women are great wrestlers. It take more effort to win via an accumulation of points than it is through a straight up pin. It takes endurance and a clear head.
Keep kicking ass ladies!
Always surprises me how Tiny can research complex topics and in a matter of weeks get knowledgeable enough to debate experts - while also not knowing very basic things like the fact that different citation styles use footnotes differently, with many using them exclusively as supplementary info and short comments.
Destiny doesn’t know where like half the US states are on a map. He’s really knowledgeable about a handful of topics and straight dogshit on others. Like stuff that any middle schooler should know. How many times have you seen him struggle to pronounce a word that you learned in like 8th grade?
Dave Rubles of the Russian report
Stream vod got privated, gonna have to watch vids now 😌
Kick vods stay up
@MisterS. oh shit, good thinking
If the ip, Jan 6th and future projects are never gonna actually come out can you at least host the vods on RUclips.
Liberals want January 6th. Loads of vids on tik tok. Liberal version
I think he’s saying that portion of the UN report is just regurgitated information from an anti-trans source (ie footnote), rather than a salient finding.
He took issue with Pierce framing the quote as a conclusion of the UN report, when the portion he was reading was just “a footnote”. He phrase it like that to emphasise this.
You always keep it interesting!
Trans women in sports was never the issue. Every state that has banned trans women in sports has gone on to push for anti-trans legislation since then, including bathroom bounties. It was never about protecting women's sports. It's about getting a foot in the door for regressive policy changes.
Well of course
It’s a contrived issue that almost no one actually cares about and if they do it’s because they already hate trans people and are looking for arguments to hurt them
The problem is if you think there is no issue with trans women competing with women, it doesnt matter if people care about the issue that much, it makes you look absolutely divorced from reality if you dont accept the evident issues with it.
The issue is no one has any problem (no one in the mainstream) with banning trans people from women’s sports
11:00 The question in response to Piers should've been, "you've shown us a Trump ad that claims the Dems are pro-Trans and claims that it is bad, but can you show me a single Kamala ad that says she is pro-Trans? Is it the case that the Democrats ran an incredibly pro-Trans campaign, or did the Republicans just run an incredibly anti-Trans campaign and you are conflating the two?"
Bang up job on selecting the pics for the thumbnail 😂
You mean a lil dishonest
@@WL1264 wat
I love when Destiny critiques the set up and tech of panelists.
I think the point of Pakman describing the UN trans statement as a footnote was that it wasn't research by the UN but rather just sourcing some sus source, like destiny agrees. I agree though that Pakman isn't stating it clearly and of course Piers also has no idea what's going on. Which makes these conversations very funny as a fellow autistic person that likes to really delve deep into things before making any kind of statement that these guys can just yell at each other without having any clue lol
True, if Pakman is going to go that hard he needs to quote the sourcing and explain the research/lack there of. For anyone not familiar with him they will instantly dismiss that as partisan hackery. And not admitting an ounce of truth of the relevance of the issue despite what pew pools say. He’s on pierces show. It’s going to be on balance viewed by ppl that hear about this issue all the time. Like it or not, this is one of the few issues Kamala actually looked bad with her policies. Despite this oversight, in a blind pool she had the more popular policy platform.
Truly enjoying watching Brian Tyler Cohen laughing while David Pakman tears Rubin apart 😂👌
Damn Dave Rubin hit the wall lool
He's unfazed, unbothered, no shame. He'd do it again if given 5 more million.
Piers: I was appalled by what the guest I brought on the show was saying.
Also Piers: Allows such commentary to continue functionally unabated.
Also also Piers: Is uncomfortable with people calling him out for the consequences of his behavior
Wu has betrayed us.
Wu hasn’t had a spine since gamergate.
Wu apparently has always been insane
Wu has no loyalty so she can’t betray anyone. Wu does whatever it takes, takes any position, cozies up to any social circle, in order to stay relevant.
How can Piers say hes a moderate when he never let anyone who leans even slightly left speak for more than a few seconds
Tiny sees Brianna on Piers. Tiny gets ready to burn bridge immediately 😂
Sadly he predicted it correctly because Brianna only came on to try to justify piers and Dave Rubin, she has been terrible lately
She’s a grifter
@erickane457 always has been lmao. Been grifting literqlly since college
My favorite destiny clips are when he's going against andrew wilson and gets absolutely demolished so bad he starts sperging out and everyone around just starts laughing at him 😂
He's like the Neil Breen of debating
Love D Pak but he went way too soft here
He concedes way too easily sometimes
@@za-ir5ni It's frustrating because it comes from a good foundation - we should try to build bridges with people who disagree with us. The problem right now is that the right are playing by a completely different ruleset than us and every olive branch we offer them is seen as a sign of weakness.
@LeftistMuslimGynocracy welcome to what the right has been saying about the left for years now the fact people still act like you all arnt different sides of the same coin is insane to me
@@matrixmdog "different sides of the same coin" please, just stop. Destiny's channel isn't for conspiracy theorists
@radscorpion8 yes I didn't stutter, same side of the same coin the fact you can't see that shows me you are on one of the sides 🤣🤣
To answer the question which Republicans oppose other Republicans, Matt gaetz is being scrutinized by many of his own side. Don't act like it don't happen to both sides destiny.
Pakman destroyed them. Is this the first time we've seen Pakman on the show? Hes always strong af!!!! Warrior for the left bruh
The RFK-jr impression made me burst out laughing 🤣
Rueben’s hair specifically blends in to the dark parts of the marble if you look at his left our right. If his background was lighter it wouldn’t matter as much, and you could argue Pakmans right our left is too dark, as his key is likely pretty close and has a single diffusion. But overall his is better. A cool background with a warm key and no odd shadows
My response to the trans in sports debate: get gud
I agree the trans women should just get good enough to compete with other men.
The guy on the right looks like he coming straight from an old doll factory
I'm a lifelong dem, was a bernie voter, but after bernie's failure and the ramping up of identity politics on the left, I've started voting red. My biggest driver at the poll is anti identity politics, not just the big T issue, but race relations as well. And there's MILLIONS of voters like me. I've heard countless stories of "why I left the left" or "I didn't leave the left, the left left me". You never hear that from the other side. So obviously people DO care about this stuff, and it's literally restructuring the political landscape. And maybe I'm a big dum dum who's been brainwashed by propaganda. Well, either way, the left is losing support because of it. So idk figure something out. If people like me aren't objectively right about what's going on, it's irrelevant, we're still leaving your side, so figure something out. Put out better propaganda. Or open your eyes and realize we're right. Do something.
Well there's this nebulous "the left left me." Y'all gotta specify what you mean for anything to be done. Can't speak in platitudes
What specifically about identity politics turned you away?
You are literally a big dummy. There’s no actual way to appeal to you that progresses or improves anything. You don’t vote on issues that matter; you vote on issues that are irrelevant to pretty much all policy, AND you don’t seem to have much of an explanation here for doing so. Maybe the option is reinstitution some test to vote that may weed folks like you out; a simple literacy test might actually work here
@Ariana-zr2cr the entire premise. We should structure society on merit, and judging people by the content of one's character, not any part of their immutable identity. I view modern leftist identitarians the same as any far right white supremacist. In fact, they ARE the same. White supremacy IS identity politics, it just centers white people, whereas modern leftists pretty much invert that and center anything that's not a historically privileged class. They're both morally repugnant. I'll vote for any republican who is against identity politics before I vote for an identitarian leftist, even if I agree with the leftist on all the economic stuff (as I do support things like m4a, tuition free college, etc).
@DavidJones-ot8qu that wouldn't work because any test you could construct, I would pass. I'm college educated and I score in the 97th percentile of tests. So even if the test wasn't just straight up facts which I would know, I'm smart enough and good at testing such that I could manipulate my way through passing it. You want to say I'm dum dum but I'm actually not, sorry.
The worst thing about being a centrist is understanding everyone's perspective but feel unable to fully support one
We need to hold people like this accountable socially
Which people?
@ the people who openly do terrible unacceptable things in the open
@@Jacob-Liggettlike who??
@@matrixmdogyour mom
so let me get this straight. Piers spends 5 minutes addressing the white suprematism of his last guest, being appalled, disavowing etc, only to immediately say, when pivoting to his current guests " what a magnificent panel of white dudes". The subtext is astounding.
I think that was purposeful though lol, he was pointing out the irony
29:00 david rubin tenet media
My guy
Rubin says "you had the entire cultural machine - all of Hollywood, all of Music (...)"
Did he ever wonder how is it, that like 90% of artists of any kind are left-leaning and liberal? Far higher than "educated people vs uneducated" or any other metric for any social group you want to check. Why is that Dave?! WHY IS THAT?!?
7:04
Kinda dumb that we are pulling hairs on a fraction of a fraction of a percentage of the entire population playing sports... The fact that anyone would get into the weeds about it instead of dismissing it in 5 mins is proof "someone" is overblowing this issue.
2 views after 9 seconds? Bro fell off
Dave Rubin is possibly the most annoying know-it-all on earth
Pakman did end up looking kinda bad in that interview though.
I’m sure he looked bad to the people huffing gasoline.
Pakman is bad buddy.
Only if you're a betacuck right wing rubin stan.
Destiny is right about the citations thing. Let’s say you have a story about Bob leaving his house to buy some eggs. You have three articles that go over the event. Let’s label them citations [1] [2] & [3]. Citation [1] talks about him when he is already at the story and buying the eggs and going back home, but not getting to the store. Citation [2{ talks about him going to the store and buy the eggs but not getting back home. Citation [3] talks about him going to the story and going back home with the eggs but not the time he spent at the store buying the eggs. You would cite it something like this:
Bob left his house at 13:00. He had a leisurely walk and arrived at the store without incident [2][3]. He browsed through the store for a time until he reached the egg section. He picked up a dozen eggs and walked them to the cash where he promptly paid for them [1][2]. Bob left the store with a dozen eggs in hand and walked back home without incident [1][3].
That way you can have multiple sources to collaborate the same event in its entirety without having a source that discusses everything you want to address. What the UN report did was sloppy citations and it makes it look like there was more incidents than there actually were.
Just IMAGINE how bad it would be if Destiny was there while Dave tried to pop off like that. Destiny would give him a career ending verbal lashing 😂
Health isn't one or the other Destiny. You can sugar tax AND ban questionable chemicals.
When you say "it's just a footnote" what you're actually saying usually is that it's unimportant to the overall thing you're discussing. Pakman kind of shot himself in the leg when he said that Piers is disingenuous because it's a footnote, but then later redeems himself by saying "look at the source".
Because what he was actually talking about is where did the study get its data. And like, fine, I guess. But nevertheless I don't think we should be ever this hasty to dismiss a UN report. Because where are we supposed to go check the data? The UN seems like an obvious source. So, it's one thing to criticize a specific report with facts and data, and it's another to brush something off as a footnote or whatever.
Pakman should not embrace Wu’s “friendship”
david pakman was trying to say that the source listed in that un report regarding the medals lost was bogus (submission from 'women's liberation front')
Destiny is starting to sputter out 🤣 dude has an entitlement problem. How dare anyone be smarter than me, and how dare you not believe everything I say because I read it off Wikipedia...... Your wiki says you have been pegged multiple times destiny, so is wiki all facts or mostly lies?
But he doesn't read mostly off Wikipedia. He reads primary sources like he did in this video. But you clearly didn't watch it before responding to a version of Destiny that you have in your mind...