Estimating the standard deviation from a histogram/boxplot

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 авг 2024
  • Let me know in the comments section below what other videos you would like made and what course or Exam you are studying for! (Ans: Range/6 = (Max value - lowest value)/6)
    Use the 68-95-99.7% rule to estimate the standard deviation.
    Ans: Range/6 = (Max value - lowest value)/6
    Another approximation is Range/4. BUT if question states using 68-95-99.7% rule you would use method as in video.
    I believe Range/6 is a better approximation. If you calculate the Range/4 you are essentially finding 25% of data and saying that this number covers 50% data below and above the mean. BUT We know that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation above and below the mean. So Range/6 is a better approximation.

Комментарии • 65

  • @Aussiebuck
    @Aussiebuck Год назад +2

    big up you for making this means alot, even 7 years later still helpful and descriptive.

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  Год назад

      Thanks, glad it is clear for most people :)

  • @Picplosions
    @Picplosions 7 лет назад +26

    This helped me so much dude, you have a nice teaching style :)

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  7 лет назад +4

      Michael Geros thank you. Nice to hear it helped

    • @edwardnelson9130
      @edwardnelson9130 6 лет назад +1

      awwwwwwww

    • @rainapatel1899
      @rainapatel1899 5 лет назад +1

      LOVE YOU DUUUUDEEEEEEEE ROCK ON MY GUYYYYYYYYY

  • @chriscothran8744
    @chriscothran8744 4 года назад +32

    Who was yelling in the background? 😅

  • @balls4924
    @balls4924 7 лет назад +7

    Good stuff! It really helped me for my engineering class!

  • @FiveMissiles
    @FiveMissiles 6 месяцев назад +1

    thanks bro u the man!

  • @triglyceryde4439
    @triglyceryde4439 2 года назад +1

    Good Job i learnt sooo much

  • @hannananan9427
    @hannananan9427 Год назад +1

    Amazing

  • @zanerubaie3226
    @zanerubaie3226 4 года назад +2

    Thanks, this helped with Further Maths

  • @asfandyarimtiaz7322
    @asfandyarimtiaz7322 4 года назад +2

    Thank you so much. Exactly what I wanted!

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад +1

      Just wondering what subject you needed this for?

    • @asfandyarimtiaz7322
      @asfandyarimtiaz7322 4 года назад +1

      @@DanielDJB data interpretation section for GRE

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад +1

      @@asfandyarimtiaz7322 Many thanks. Just wondering as a lot of people from U.S have watched. Hope you went well!

  • @isaacd.380
    @isaacd.380 6 лет назад +13

    i have no idea what is going on

    • @aoa0687
      @aoa0687 5 лет назад +1

      me too...

  • @eggyolk8067
    @eggyolk8067 3 месяца назад

    If there are outliers in the box plot, do I need to factor them in?

  • @MRCMatheus
    @MRCMatheus 4 года назад +1

    Thanks for the video! Helped a lot :)

  • @satindollyxx
    @satindollyxx 8 месяцев назад

    the background noise is insane

  • @adrianli916
    @adrianli916 5 лет назад

    Best video ever!!!!!!

  • @stephhgreig1117
    @stephhgreig1117 7 лет назад +22

    This makes no sense to me... why can't I understand this?! I hate statistics!! Aggggh!!!

  • @shriennathsevva852
    @shriennathsevva852 2 месяца назад

    whole lotta turbulence

  • @guibertthechampion2652
    @guibertthechampion2652 5 лет назад +2

    Thank you.

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад

      Glad it helped.. Just wondering what subject you needed this for?

  • @leejohnson197733
    @leejohnson197733 Год назад

    i am trying to sketch a normal distribution graph based on a mean of 21.8k and sd of 1k with a range of 19-24k with a nominal value of 22k any advice? i have worked out the numbers but not sure how to show on a bell graph
    i worked out 19-21.8/2 = -2.8 and 24-21.8/2 = +2.2 i need to show 2 graphs and compare, changing the sd to 21.5 and see which one gives better results closer to 22k.

  • @kichwachagoogle5138
    @kichwachagoogle5138 4 года назад +3

    mmmm i am still do not understand

  • @paperplate9301
    @paperplate9301 6 лет назад +1

    Very helpful thank you

  • @joshuavanname1246
    @joshuavanname1246 4 года назад +1

    Thank you... subscribed

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад

      Glad it helped.. Just wondering what subject you needed this for?

  • @helena-zd6sw
    @helena-zd6sw 3 года назад

    if your lower limit was a negative number and the mean was 0 would it be
    (60-(-60))/6?

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  3 года назад

      I think you mean smallest value is -60 and average/mean is 0. So because of symmetry the "upper limit" would be +60. So estimate would be 120/6.

    • @helena-zd6sw
      @helena-zd6sw 3 года назад

      @@DanielDJB thank you!!

  • @michaelcui
    @michaelcui 3 года назад

    ty bb

  • @kol2456
    @kol2456 7 лет назад +1

    wouldn't you divide by 4?

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  7 лет назад +1

      That is another approximation/estimate but if question states using 68-95-99.7% rule you would use method as in video. I believe Range/6 is a better approximation. If you do Range/4 you are essentially finding 25% of data and saying that this number covers 50% data below and above the mean. BUT We know that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation above and below the mean. So Range/6 would be better.

  • @melakjenkins8696
    @melakjenkins8696 3 года назад

    lol this is the exact same question in my further book

  • @2921mozart
    @2921mozart 8 лет назад +11

    everyone teaching me math on youtube are mostly foreigners

    • @jedholckner4734
      @jedholckner4734 7 лет назад +8

      How dare you disrespect the Brosche

    • @edwardnelson9130
      @edwardnelson9130 6 лет назад +1

      Yeah you tell 'em!

    • @Mangko
      @Mangko 6 лет назад +3

      how is it even possible to define foreigner on the internet lmao

    • @kanivakil198
      @kanivakil198 6 лет назад

      @ JOVANTZL Yeah, it's either some fucking Indian accent or some accent for the UK or Australia or New Zealand. Like fuck!

    • @kanivakil198
      @kanivakil198 6 лет назад

      @Robert O' Conner; it's anyone that doesn't speak with an American accent. It means the RUclipsr is using a foreign accent.

  • @silverwolftg5498
    @silverwolftg5498 6 лет назад

    Was this in the Further Maths exam? Which exam was that?

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  6 лет назад

      I am pretty sure it is from a Further Exam

  • @vampiredutchess1
    @vampiredutchess1 4 года назад

    You lost me at 1:10 😭

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/cgxPcdPbujI/видео.html

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  4 года назад

      This guy is good at explaining concepts. Basically a lot of normal data follows this curve.. think heights of 14 year old boys or something similar.. they may vary between 140 to 180 cm. And the standard deviation is a number which nreaks up this data into intervals..

  • @AdhavR7
    @AdhavR7 7 месяцев назад

    I hate this unit so much I don’t understand anything

    • @DanielDJB
      @DanielDJB  7 месяцев назад

      Maybe the easiest way of thinking about standard deviation is a means of how far spread out the data is.
      Consider 10 data points
      Zero standard deviation
      100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100
      The mean is 100
      The standard deviation is zero (no variation about the mean - there is zero range)
      small standard deviation
      98, 98, 98, 99, 100, 100, 101, 102, 102, 105
      The mean is roughly 100 and the spread (range) about the mean is small
      Larger standard deviation
      10, 20, 60, 80, 100, 100, 120, 130, 140, 140
      The mean is roughly 100
      But because data is more spread out, the standard deviation will be larger.
      The 68, 95, 99.7% rule tells you about how much data is within the intervals.
      Consider a selection of 100 people with normal distribution
      If the average height is 150 cm and a standard deviation of 10 cm. This means about 68 people (68% of 100) will have heights between 140 and 160 cm.... and so on....

  • @lukehannebery9953
    @lukehannebery9953 5 лет назад +1

    this vid was bad ngl