The World's LONGEST Narrowbody Flight is INSANE: 9 HOURS!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- I took the world's longest narrowbody flight at over 9 hours long, from the USA to Europe.
OFFICIAL NOEL MERCH: www.noelphilip...
MY PILOT VLOGS CHANNEL: @NoelPhilipsPilotVlogs
JOIN ME ON WHATSAPP, GET WEEKLY LIVE CHATS AND MUCH MORE - SUPPORT ME ON PATREON! / inflightvideo
The fella moving your seat was excellent customer service, suitably apologetic and did well to sell you on the moves. This kinda stuff doesn’t cost but makes a huge difference. .
That agent was really great...everything about his manner was spot on...
Very accommodating
Was gonna come and say this. Makes me want to fly with them just because of this interaction. Oh, if all ground staff were this brilliant!
It didn't make any sense because what he said and where you sat didn't match.
Well he had the fortune of being able to offer something better than what was previously had.
The volume of some of your voice overs in this cideo were really low and could barely hear them over the noise of other things in the video.
Was about to comment on this. No good.
His audio mixing has been hit and miss for awhile. Sometimes I'll have to turn up the volume to hear him then BOOM stock music playing at max volume.
Yeahh i have to really strain to hear it
Its unfortunate, would have been a great vid otherwise.
Absolutly right, the sound was terrible and the booming music dreadful. I wouldn't like the window seat if you have to climb over a stranger to go to the loo !
I think what puts people off taking a narrowbody flight long haul is they think it's going to be 9 hours on a Ryanair flight. Arrivederci is also goodbye.
haha, that's like the "do svidaniya" in Transformers. "That means goodbye".
I suspect that might be a joke by now. He's done the same in Italy before.
Don't give Ryanair any ideas. Please.
@@halfbakedproductions7887 You can already do sort of long haul on Wizzair if you have masochistic tendencies.... ;)
NO. I prefer the smooth quiet A380, thank you. After that, a B777 or even an LH B747 will do for me. Bigger is better and quieter with a smoother flight, less bumpy for me. Which is fine. I'll let you take the small aircraft leaves more room for me in the big aicraft.
with the A321XLR coming, we could be seeing more of these types of flights
Already very common with the current 737 and A321. The XLR will just add range. You might see longer, smaller city pairs connected.
I took Norwegian's Boeing 737 Max 8 from Providence to Dublin back in 2019. The narrow-body layout didn't affect comfort, and the interior was very stylish for a budget airline, but the seats were as hard as a rock. It was literally just leather on plastic.
By the time I made it to my "cozy" Ryanair flight to Krakow, I slept like a baby.
737 max 8 on Norwegian from SFO to FCO with 2 adults and 3 kids 7-12 in economy. Good flight
I know they have to ask but asking Noel "are you able to assist in case of emergency" did make me chuckle, considering he would probably be able to pop into the cockpit and fly the thing to Milan by himself :)
I feel like the background noise overpowers your dialogue in a few parts of the video.
As many others have commented (see @chinaberg below), very poor sound quality for this vlog. I have no idea why. I'm sure you can fix the problem.🙂
@@markjones2781 could it be the airplane is noisy? some aircraft are quite bad (a350/380 are quiet)
I didn’t have a problem hearing it
Yeah, the sound mixing was ofc throughout the entire video.
Nothing wrong with the sound then I’m using noise cancelling headphones.
Glad to know it’s not just me that taps the plane before I board. Great vid Noel!
My wife makes fun of me when I tap the plane before I board 😂
Travel video presenter, Paul Lucas does this in his videos also.
Thanks! 👍
It seems there's a whole lot more of us than I ever imagined.
Glad to know I'm not alone!
Noel me and my fella have been subscribed to your channel for a long time now and just feel the need to tell you that you really are one of the most genuinely nice people(vloggers) we have had the pleasure of watching.so thank you 😊 👍
Thank you for your kind words.
"It's really not the best" -- probably the nicest description of Newark airport I've ever heard!
Imagine flying for any length of time only to arrive at Newark.
I personally love EWR!
@@techspeak5801how it’s a disaster
A coworker of mine once said "There's Eww and then there's EWR" 😅
@@techspeak5801 is this due to chances of being delayed more than on time? Or is it the bathrooms that haven’t been cleaned in five years or maybe the really rude staff? Unless of course I’ve never flown out of terminal B terminal C is totally OK. It’s not great, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with it terminal B and the old terminal a it’s just a mess. There are better airports, in Third World countries.
Thanks Noel. See you in London on Saturday, I'm really looking forward to it
Waaay too many people in the lounge for my liking. Aside from that, La Compagnie look like a nice enough airline though. Another great video Noel, thanks for making them each week, a lot of work goes into these I’m sure. Always appreciated mate! 👌🏻
Yes this was another interesting one. The problem with an all-business airline will probably be that the lounge needs to be bigger too. Reminds me of a conclusion of one of the Gilbert and Sullivan opera songs: "... to this conclusion you'll agree; when everyone is "somebody", then no-one's anybody"!
@@briangentle5515 I very much like that quote, I agree with the sentiment too. Very good.
"The pineapples don't mean anything" hahahaha. Awesome video!
Best line, gotta 💛 Noel + 🍍
3:50 as someone who's home airport is EWR, Terminal B is absolutely abysmal. However, the brand new Terminal A that opened last year just won the Skytrax award for best new airport in the world and it truly is quite amazing. If you ever come back around the NYC area, try taking a flight that leaves from Terminal A. Can guarantee you'll have a much more enjoyable experience
You should fly around the world on only narrow bodies it’s possible I think
Don't think any narrow bodies are crossing the pacific
The transpacific is the limiting aspect. Fiji Airways is the key, from Australia (Adelaide and the odd Melbourne flight) to Nadi, then one of their flights through Kiribati to Honolulu. Or the United island hopper from Guam. There are also the odd Nauru airlines etc, but they won't get you all the way to Honalulu/USA
@@tomstravels520 Fiji airways fly the 737 max to Hawaii I think
@@justthatguy9946 Yeah, I think Fiji is the way to go. There are plenty of NB flights from Asia to Guam and from Hawaii to the US, but I don't see any NB passenger flights between Guam and Hawaii. So the southern route looks like the only option.
I have found RTW routings in only 737s. It’s very doable on the A320 series as well.
Great video Noel, I am struggling however to hear your voiceover in places. Have you ever considered doing some content in the smaller Greek islands? Some very interesting approaches! Would love to see that!
A narrow-body flight always gives you a more intimate sense of what flying means. More turbulence? Yay. A bigger chance of a window seat? Yay!
On narrow and wide bodies, you get the exactly same comfy (or cramped) seats.
The 2x2 config is the major selling point here as you mentioned. Having done a few 6+ hr flights on narrow body airframes I’d say that’s about my limit lol
Sorry Noel. Hearing you on this episode, is very very hard. The volume is terrible. Sorry, I hope it gets better next week.
Even the Loo Review was bad. I hope that the sound mixing gets fixed soon. Maybe it’s a new editor who just wasn’t aware they didn’t turn down the background levels?
The only time I ever flew out of Newark was on the late, not so great People's Express (People's Distress?) in the 1980s. It was about the most disorganized flying experience I have ever had. Noel would have loved it. ;-)
I will always chose wide body over narrow body in any kind or distance of a flight. The reason for me its simple but maybe not that important to many : bigger airplanes are more stable in bad weather or when the ride is not optimal. Ive been many times in the 777, 787, A330, etc and how the handle turbulence is better than smaller airplanes.
That is an urban myth.
@@chrismckellar9350 No, it's absolutely true. Larger planes are more stable in turbulence.
@clapanse depends. The back of an A340-600 gets quite annoying in turbulence
@@clapanse - I have to disagree. Regardless of size, any commercial aircraft will have issues in turbulence.
I think it's pretty obvious the bigger the plane the smoother the turbulence anyone that's ever flown in smaller planes knows this
the women next to you on flight would not stop picking her nose when you was showing the amenity kit and at points could see her rubbing her fingers and flicking her boogers and at 1 point she looks directly at your camera after flicking an smiled/grinned 🤣...keep up the good work lol
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Done Newark a fair few times - transition to Portland ME. Spent 11 hours there once due to constant delays.
Thank you for the fresh perspective on long-haul narrow-body flights! As a pilot as well as a long time traveler, I have always been in support of the longer flights over 5 hours being on a wide-body. But I see now the benefit of a business class model for narrow-body long haul flights. As long as it is affordable for the airline, I wish more airlines would adopt this model rather than cramming as many people onto a smaller plane. Especially with a middle seat!
United airline has a separate terminal C which is much nicer than the terminal B, also Newark has a new and open terminal A as well. Terminal B is the only one that is really small.
Love to see your room in the house where you keep all the amenity kits !!
LOL, i was too distracted by the woman in the background picking her nose for ages
Chicago - London with a stop in Montréal on a 707. Airtime 7.5 hours eastbound, 8 hours westbound, not counting time on ground in Montréal. (Revealing my age with this.)
Booked onto a narrowbody Washinton DC to Milan a few years later, but when an engine got sparky after takeoff, came down in Boston, and we were all salted into a 747 for Rome, then a domestic Italian flight to Milan with no English or French language newspapers available.
Technically Concorde was a narrow body aircraft and it also flew between New York and Paris
In some ways this A321 layout is better than a Concorde. The Concorde flew higher and much faster but that was about it. How many wealthy people only flew Concorde once for the experience & then went back to flying first class on B747s?
Let’s not forget the Uk
Noel, I'm with you about the virtues of the narrow body for long flights. After all, that
is all there used to be. Think of the Lockheed Super Constellation, and the Boeing 707.
I flew to Europe twice on a 707, and found it very nice indeed.
I always tap the outter skin of the plane when boarding too. Ever since I was a little kid. Superstition and for luck. And I’ve never had a negative flight experience. It works.
My longest narrow body aircraft flight was from California to Okinawa, Japan (refueling stop in Honolulu). A year later, Okinawa to San Diego (refueling stop in Anchorage). Both flights were on Boeing 707-320 series aircraft. 1969 and 1970.
My longest flight on a narrow body flight was in September 1972 in a stretched DC-8 from Yokota Air Base Japan to Travis Air Force Base, CA, USA. Oh, BTW it was 15 hours with all seats economy (six across). And it was nonstop at that.
Starting around 8:30 - I believe the person in the background is ‘cleaning’ their nose? 😮
Really disgusting😭even eating all the bits it as well😱
My wife and I recently flew on a JetBlue A321 core/economy AMS-JFK, flight time was just minutes shy of 8 hours. We were lucky, we had a window and aisle with nobody between us but despite this being a long flight on a single aisle aircraft, this was by far one of the best TATL flights we’ve ever had. I’m sure the empty seat between us helped but even without that it would have been perfectly fine. My conclusion is that it’s the airline, seat and service that makes the flight, far more than how many aisles the aircraft has. Yes, there can be a line for the lavatories as the ratio isn’t as great on a typical narrowbody but I’d counter that by saying exiting the aircraft can be 5-10 minutes faster from the back of the plane when compared to a larger widebody. To me, the compromises aren’t a big deal at all.
2 month ago I flew with TAP Air Portugal from Lisbon to Newark on the Airbus A321neo in business class and I can say that it feels much more exclusive flying a long flight on a narrow body aircraft rather then in a wide body like b777, so I would totally do it again!
Noel that looked absolutely brilliant i would love to fly that aircraft . Great video as always
Many thanks!
Have you tried Air Transit, SAS or Aer Lingus on their A321LR's?
I think he’s done Aer Lingus A321LR between Dublin and London in business class
Your videos are comforting, interesting and I often find myself laughing at your humerous takes. Thanks for taking us along on your journeys!
Thank you for your kind words, glad you enjoy them.
I’d take that flight over the wide body aircraft. I loved everything about it, meals, drinks, comfort level of seats. Just perfect ❤
The way you say "Newark" always reminds of my family from Newark, Notts! 😉😂
Hi Noel what a great video loved the airline looked very good your are correct less people better service keep up the great work you are doing for aviation. Paul in Kent
Glad you enjoyed it
I’ve done Hartford BDL to Dublin DUB return multiple times on Aer Lingus in their a321 and always love it.
I used to fly La Compagnie a couple of times a year on the EWR-NCE route. My biggest complaints are the lack of interconnection in the US and the schedule that forces me to spend the night at EWR before I can get a flight home. BA expanded service into my home airport from LHR, so I've switched my transatlantic flying to them.
Probably 20 years ago I flew non stop with continental on a 757 from ewr to anc. That was every bit of 9 hours and change. Love the videos keep it going!
Longest narrow-body flight I've done is Amsterdam-Kano with a stop in Tunis, on a DC-8 in Air Suriname livery (!), flown by KLM. I think it was about six or seven hours including the stop. (The flight from Montreal (Mirabel!) to AMS was on an L-1011! Only time I was ever on that plane.) Not the longest distance in the world, but the start of a two-year stay in Nigeria from 1981-3 while my parents were teaching there. I turned 13 on the way home in Scotland, as we took a couple weeks to get back to Canada.
Great review Noel. I wouldn’t agree with your conclusion about narrow bodies. Not because the size of the plane but because what the airlines try to squeeze out of them.
I took a 6.5hr A321NX overnight last week on an LCC and it was awful. All designed to pack in the sardines. Thin uncomfortable seats, no folding headrest to act as a pillow. Came back on a full service 787 and it was chalk and cheese.
I have to agree….though I love widebodies, it is easier on a narrow body. Boarding and deplaning is faster as is service. I’ve done the Cleveland to Dublin run in economy and that was great. Also have done low cost Play airlines Boston-Iceland-Paris and that was also awesome. As a child I did the Boston-Frankfurt many times on the Lufthansa 707.
I agree with you, planes are definitely more enjoyable with less people. My longest flight was onboard an A320 from Seoul to Phnom Penh, which was 6h long. The only downside being that it was noisy compared to the A350 we flew before from Paris to Seoul. I think that a silent narrow body plane like the A220 or the latest A321 XLR would be an amazing choice for a long haul flight!
I absolutely touch the outside of the plane every single time I board. Every time, without fail. I laughed when you brought that up and have honestly wondered if you do that as well 😂
I flew from Newark to Sao Paulo back December of 2009 on Continental Airlines. Plenty of restaurants i had no problems at Newark.
When it comes to comfort narrowbodied planes are exactly equal to widebodies. I was around when DC-8 :s were used on longhaul flights. My longest DC-8 flight was with SAS from Copenhagen to Seattle and back. About 10,5 hours duration. It depends more on the seats and legroom rather than if its a narrowbody or mot.
When 11 (friends/family) of you take a flight from France to the US using La Compagnie and you get your own section of the aircraft it does feel like a private jet. Superb airline and the narrow body aircraft are perfect for the job.
Back in 2003, one-way Boston to Philly, US Airways Express (City shuttle) now American Airlines. Flight: Devil Dash 8 Aircraft, fit 30 people with turboprop engines, (Non-jet). Flight was 90 minutes. Philly International has prior two intersecting runways running vertical than horizontal (left to right) Vertical allowed for very small planes and helicopters to land when space opens before the big jets use the other runways. You can hear loudly the planes back side landing gear hit first. Terrible turbulence. Philly completed their runway extension project and eliminated these different style runways.
Astounded this was your first time visiting EWR!
Lucky you, every time I visit NY, I seem to land there, and it’s atrocious
"Next door to New York" don't do my state of NJ like that!
I've flown from Thailand to the Philippines to Okinawa to Yokota Air Base near Tokyo, Japan on a C-9 Medivac USAF aircraft - narrow body DC-9 airplane. Wasn't much fun. But yeah I see a market for that kind of Airbus in such a business configuration - works well.
Newark is in New Jersey, another state - believe it or not
I flew out of Newark Airport once. It was from Newark to London on People's Express - First Class! First-class was upstairs (on a 747). We had an in-flight movie on a 16mm projector. I was working for Cray Research, Inc., (1982-1993) and the rule was simple: they pay for business class overseas. I could go first class if the price was equal to or less than the normal (e.g., Northwest Airlines) business class, OR I could use miles for the upgrade. I wanted to see what all the talk about People's Airline was about.
Missing the good old days of BA’s Openskies, which I flew a lot between ORY and EWR/IAD… Too bad they stopped operating in favor of the development of LEVEL from the ORY base (which stopped operating during COVID and never restarted)
I remember flying alot in the 90"s and early 2000's. The airports overseas was always alot better then the Airports here in America and it looks like it is still that way from your videos that i have watched.
4:19 it's not just you, I always like to do that. Them moving you without making it a whole ordeal was excellent service. Some other carriers would move you without telling you to a much worse seat (my dad once spent $20 extra on American to get a seat with more leg room, I believe in an exit row but I could be wrong, and they moved him to a middle seat with very little leg room without saying anything beforehand even though he paid more for more room. He's over six feet tall, so he really does need that leg room).
The voice over @ 2:31 is not great :/ the lounge background sound is too loud
Appreciate you managed to find an El Al plane at both EWR and MXP. Nice way to tie the video together.
Love your content but one day you may lose everything if you continue not to blur people's faces like every other aviation RUclipsr. This is not public space, it is private space and people have been sued before by someone who didn't want their face shown on a plane etc. It is not a joke!
Ok boomer
He probably asks people he’s engaged with directly. Some person just randomly walking around in an airport has no expectation of privacy.
Frankfurt-Toronto on 757-200 with Air Transat in 1997. But as we had a stop in Montreal, the longest stretch was Frankfurt-Montreal. 3.629miles or 5841km.
Been watching your trips for a few months now, very enjoyable. Im doing a long haul in a few days time. Melbourne - Singapore - Heathrow - Dundee - Sumburgh, 34 hours including stopovers. Originally from Shetland, but live in Australia.
Main disadvantage for narrow bodies is cruise speed. They cruise at circa 50kts slower than wide bodies. So on a flight of this length would be about 45 minutes slower
People forget that well into the 1970s, long-haul flights were typically flown on the Boeing 707 and Douglas DC-8, which were narrow-bodies, and nobody complained. Before that, it used to be even longer flights (in terms of duration) on even smaller Constellations and DC-6s. And you do have a point in the quicker embarkation and disembarkation times, less congestion, and swifter service on a narrow-body. Hey, I miss the 727's rear stairs, which helped to fill and empty the plane in a heartbeat.
That said, there is something comforting and less claustrophobic in a wide-body cabin. For sure, it's purely psychological and has all those tradeoffs you mentioned, but it may mean a slightly less stressful experience to many passengers. It must also be remembered that a typical economy-class seat on a 707 was much roomier than today's average. It also depends on the plane model: I HATED my only flight on a 757. It was just a 2:30-hour hop (DFW-MIA on American), but I arrived exhausted, as if I had flown 10 hours. That very long cabin of the 757 made service slow, the flight very stressful, and access to the lavatories difficult. Since the A321 has similar dimensions to the 757, I'd expect a similar experience.
But to each one's own, and it's good to be able to choose. As for La Compagnie, it looks like it was a nice flight, but I found it too expensive and bad value for money. You can certainly find much more modern business-class products across the Atlantic for $1900 or less one-way, especially if you buy your ticket well ahead, and you can also accrue and use alliance loyalty miles, which you can't at La Compagnie.
Insane all this time you haven't flown out of Newark before!
I've often noticed comments mentioning how much faster it is to exit an aircraft if you're seated in X, Y or Z or the aircraft is body. Unless you are hand-luggage only, it doesn't matter how fast you exit the aircraft because you still need to wait on baggage reclaim. Having worked back-of-the-house at BHD, depending on how many personel are available and how many aircraft need unloading, I found that more than once we prioritised an aircraft not because it was first in, but because something on that aircraft had to be removed fast. Departures were always given priority. That was 25 years ago and since then I have never been in a rush to deplane.
"deplane"? Jeez ...How often do you enplane? George Carlin was right about "deplane" and its only legitimate use.
@@rorykeegan1895 Just an expression we always used when I was working at BHD.
“Probably not the best” is extremely kind referring to Newark’s Terminal B. It’s a 50 year old terminal that desperately needs to be torn down, like Terminal A was for the new Terminal A.
Do a around the world trip only in narrow body jets
Hawaiian airlines does some routes from lax to Hawaii on A320s and most people hate them compared to their A330s
Many moons ago Eastern Airlines always flew out of Newark. Thanks for the video, 👏👍
Thanks for watching!
The longest narrow body flight I've done was on Azores from YYZ to PDL. Comfortable enough, but I found overhead bin space to be an issue. They had to ask people to gate check bags.
I am going to take my longest narrowbody flight from ORD to KEF in October. Going to be an exciting trip!
This is all interesting, this is so awesome, I flew to newark on allegiant from Des Moines Iowa last year, they gate up with the international planes my gate was 50 something I remembered, it's funny to be next to a big air india or egyptair, and el al, when you are flying domestic on a tiny A320, EWR it's has a totally different vibe than many of the big US airports I been to, you just have to be there to know lol
I've taken several flights from Dublin to US airports on 757s, and found it surprisingly pleasant, even in economy.
Nice to see you at my local airport EWR! Unfortunately you experienecd the worst terminal there 😅
New Jersey is a state that deserves to be recognized.
Noel,
I see some empty seats behind you. What was the load factor?
Absolutely love your videos, seeing the world through them is so enjoyable.
Noel great video, but the world longest narrow body flight is between Copenhagen/Kastrup and Washington. Which is being operated by Sas Scandinavian Airlines on an A321LR
Really like the random currency you include in your price breakdown. Always a good chuckle!
Glad you enjoy it!
Noel great video as always, but please check the sound mixing, its been a bit off lately. For example with the music in the background.
I've done 6 hours on a 737-800 PHX-ANC before, and then I think the longest narrow-body flight I've done was GLA-PHL on a 757-200, was just around 7 and a half hours I believe that one. I always tend to prefer a widebody, I just like the feel of the larger twin aisle cabin, and they tend to feel a little smoother in turbulent air to me, but a narrow body is still acceptable on a longer flight.
Just a few days ago I was on FlightRadar and saw a 737 crossing the Atlantic (America-bound). Shame I can't remember what airline or route it was, but it definitely surprised me.
I didn't realise they used narrowbodies for that kind of thing.
I never thought one of Noel's videos would have me looking up the population of Costa Rica, but by my calculations they now have about 4 million colons left...
Two years ago, I went to London for the first time. I was booked on a 767 from Newark to Heathrow. Thanks to a cancellation of the flight from my home city into Newark, I scrambled to find an alternative, and United found me a spot. After going to Washington DC instead of Newark, and spending a night there, I finally got to Heathrow...on a 757. I was disappointed to see a single-aisle making it across the Atlantic, and it certainly wasn't the most comfortable way to get there for a lowly coach (albeit Economy Plus) passenger, but I was thankful to get there. Flight time was just over 7 hours.
Looking at that flight now, they have since changed to widebody.
My longest flight on a narrow body and ever was a 5 hour nonstop from Cleveland to LAX back in 1986!
Had no trouble hearing you. Interesting flight. Great socks.
Alcohol free champagne on a flight is such a great idea!
Good video; I'd been curious about La Compagnie since seeing them at EWR a while back. Absolutely gobsmacked that you've never been to EWR (3:51). It's not the best, but certainly not the worst (in my opinion). Equally gobsmacked by your assertion at (12:34)... guess I need to improve my diet. And, on that very same note, your stress on the first syllable of "colón" (16:38) made the eleven-year-old in me giggle.
Let’s not forget about this. You know I haven’t chance to fly on A321LR or XLR, but I flew on A321neo last year. I fly out PHX to Miami.
I ALWAYS tap the hull before getting on Noel! Thought I was the only one that did that. 😎👍🏼
Air Transat, a former charter airline known for packing passengers operates the 321 trans atlantic and it is now more comfortable than Air Canada.
Ever since the 787, designed for 8 across was sold as 9 across with narrow seats, and Boeing convinced airline accountans to put 10 across on the 777 designed for 9 across, the 320 family has had wider seats than on planes originally designed for long haul. So even on coach configs, the 321 is more comfortable than the 787 or 777 in coach. (the 330 is seen in its original 8 across but often also narrow seats 9 across these days).
There is a caveat though: one needs to compare the number of loos per passenger. On long haul, more people will use the loo so f the aircraft has same number of loos as for a 2-3 hour flight, you will get long lines of people waiting. The 321-XLR is getting upgraded holding tak capacity because it is designed speciccally for long haul where all pax end up going at least once. A neo with only 78 pax on board is not a problem, but put 150 in and you could end up with situation of "toilet is full" error message.
How the airline configures the galley space also matters. How many hot/cold meals they can cater can vary from airline to airline since a galley desiged for true trans atlantic service with 2 meals will take up more space and likely kill one extra row of seats. (not an issue on your flight, but on a normal flight with coach, that starts to matter).
I flew from Almaty Kazakhstan (ALA) to London Heathrow (LHR) on a 757 in 2006. Almost 10 hours!
A very good Monday morning to you all from Wellington Somerset in the UK
Morning!
If I recall correctly, the longest narrow body flight I took was back in 1994 from London to New York on a 737. I do remember it took 7 hours, and was definitely not a wide-body jumbo jet like I had always been on (DC-10, 747, L10-11) from the US to UK. It may have been a 757 or 767, however, because I am kind of doubtful that 737s could have made it across the Atlantic at that time.
Cool video as usual. I like the plane that looks rather comfortable actually. I did miss the part with what you have for breakfast. However the dinner service looks nice. The bathroom looked awfully small but then again it is a narrow body playing so there you go lolkeep up the great work, my friend.