Excellent message Pastor Jennings. Definitely looking forward to the next one on this topic! May God continue to bless and strengthen you in doing His work! 🙏✝️
Thank you Truth in History! I had questions about Paul and his teachings in Eph.and Gal., concerning who he was really talking to. God bless you and keep you!!
Thank You Pastor Jennings with blessings always from Our Lord Jesus Christ! Hebrews 2:16 For verily " he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham. [17] Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God , to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
The reason why Esau thought very little of his birthright was because he was more happier mixing his seed with the women of peoples who were ''outsiders''
For God so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN SON. Adam was a created. Christ was born. Adam never ate of the tree of life. Adam was just a living soul and never possessed the Holy Spirit. No human possessed the Holy Spirit within in its fullness til the LORD came in the flesh.
Genesis 3:14-15 King James Version 14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life: 15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Who were the serpents seed that bruised the heel of Christ? Paul explains: 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15 King James Version 14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Scofield dispensationalism argues that the enemies of mankind are "chosen". But the bible teaches that they are the seed or children of Lucifer.
Mishnaic tractate Negaim (“Blemishes”) offers one of the few insights into the rabbinic conceptions of race, or rather, distinct human skin colors. The tractate itself deals with various forms of tzara’at, a leprosy-like disease mentioned in the Torah portions Tazria and Metzora. In this context, Negaim 2:1 explains that “the bright [tzara’at] spot in a germani appears as dull white, and the dull white spot in a kushi appears as bright white. Rabbi Ishmael says the children of Israel … are like boxwood, neither black nor white but of an intermediate shade.” mishnah deals with a purely clinical challenge - how to diagnose tzara’at on various shades of skin. Yet it can also help us better understand our ancestors’ relationship to the modern concept of “race,” a category they didn’t share. The specific terms in this passage are interesting. The mishnah states that a Jews’ skin is unlike that of the germani. This term is probably a loanword from the Latin Germanus and refers to a member of a Germanic tribe. The word occurs in the Mishnah only in the above-cited paragraph. In the Jerusalem Talmud, there is a mention of a germani where it stands for a white person who was enslaved by Rabbi Yodan, a sage who lived in the first half of the fourth century in the Land of Israel Apparently, slavery at this point in Jewish history was not based on race. The rabbinic sages seemed to have followed the Roman model of slavery that did not base slavery on race either. Actually, most of those enslaved by the Romans were white, members of Germanic and Slavic tribes: the word “Slavic” itself was borrowed from the Greek sklábos,midrashic literature also acknowledges the existence of white and Black slaves alike. This de-coupling of the skin color from social hierarchy supports the claim that Mediterranean people of late antiquity did have a different concept of race than we do, if they had any at all. This evidence also indicates that the fusion of skin color and social hierarchies is socially constructed and subject to change. But the Mishnah does not only differentiate Jews from members of the Germanic tribes. It also states that a Jew’s skin is unlike that of a kushi. This word denotes a person from Kush, a kingdom that centered along the Nile Valley in present-day Sudan, to the south of Egypt. The two civilizations were engaged in warfare, trade and cultural exchange for centuries. Kush existed between c. 1070 BCE until 350 C.E. - that is, including the period of the Mishnah. Later on, the Hebrew word kushi came to refer other Black African peoples, too. For instance, when the original Judeo-Arabic script of the 12th-century philosophical work the Kuzari (1:2) mentions the Habesha[fn]”Habesha” is an ethnic or pan-ethnic identifier frequently employed to refer to Semitic language-speaking peoples mainly found in the highlands of present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea.[/fn] peoples, the Hebrew version of the text introduces them as kushi, even though “Habesha” and “Kushitic” are different markers of identity. The Greeks called Kush “Aethiopia,” which means literally “burnt-face.” Due to Greek cultural dominance, many, including Jewish translators, would later translate kushi as Ethiopian. Thus, as the Mishnah states, Jews are neither like the germani, nor like the kushi. Instead, the Jews’ skin has, according to the Mishnah, an “intermediate shade.” This rabbinic perception of the Jews’ skin color as brown follows those Egyptian papyri that stated that Jews were honey coloured/fn] The Mishnaic observation also reflects the self-description of other Mediterranean peoples, such as Greeks and Romans, who would describe their skin color as “medius inter nigrum et pallidum” - that is, “halfway between black and pale” (De Physiognomonia liber 88). Israelites and jews were brown
26:20 - 27:00. For those who have no witness to these words of God hating Esau, I´ll give a short explanation of the opposite. As it´s impossible for good parents to hate their own children, regardless how bad their deeds are, so is it impossible for God to hate any living soul of his creation. "For God so loved the world....." Why do he love the world? For he IS Love and genuine love cannot, cannot, cannot hate! There´s NO exceptions to Gods love to the world whatever. To tell otherwise will lead us in to the same predicament as Eliphaz the Temanite in Job 42:7. To say, "but not Esau", will lead us into the same pit of unbelief as the opposition to Jesus was fallen in. What then is the error? Teaching the letter of the Bible will result in human reasoning, grooping in darkness and not understanding the wonderful spiritual meaning, God hath hidden under the letter, not to be understood by the wise, but by the ignorant. Thus you do not hate your parents, wife and children as Jesus told you to do and I do´nt believe the preacher do it either. So God does not hate any living creature, wether it be a deadly Cobra or an fleshly Esau. God only hates that which Esau represents, the work of the flesh. God did not hate Pharaoh, he was just a toll in Gods hands, so even Esau was a toll in Gods hands to bring Jacob to the high destination God had prepared for him. God never hates his tools, he uses them to the glory of his name. As God is light and there is no darkness in him, so God is love, and there is no hate in him, no, not even towards Esau. Blessed be his name for his love to the world, and be sure, Esau is part of the world. "O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!"
In the New Testament, Paul demands active unity in the church, a unity that explicitly joins together differing ethnic groups because of their common identity in Christ. Paul proclaims that, in Christ, believers form a brand-new humanity. The old barrier of hostility and division between ethnic groups has been demolished by the cross; and now, all peoples are to be one in Christ (Rom. 4; Gal. 3-4; Col. 3; Eph. 2). Christians of other ethnicities aren’t just equal to us; they are joined to us. Paul insists that the primary identity of Christians is to be based on their union with Christ-not on traditional sociological, geographical, and ethnic connections. Again, the implications are profound. Christians of other races aren’t just equal to us; they are joined to us. As Christians, we’re all part of the same body, united by the presence of the same Holy Spirit who indwells us all. We’re not just friends or fellow worshipers in the same religion, but brothers and sisters in the same family. John gives us a glimpse of the people of God at the consummation of history, describing them as people from every tribe and language and people and nation (Rev. 5:9; 7:9; 10:11; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6; 17:15). This fourfold formula of tribe, language, people, and nation stresses the ethnic diversity of the people of God who will worship around the throne. It’s a picture of the climactic kingdom of Christ, and, as such, provides a model for us to strive toward. John clearly sees the kingdom of Christ as a multi-ethnic congregation. We must make this a reality because THIS is our destiny. Our cultures and labels we give ourselves will no longer matter in the world to come. The old earth will pass away. Favortism among people is a SIN and likned to the law breakers of old. Favoritism, according to Merriam-Webster, is “the unfair practice of treating some people better than others.” The Greek word translated favoritism in James 2 literally means to “receive according to the face.” In other words, to show favoritism is to make judgments about people on the basis of their outward appearance. Here are three reasons why showing favoritism is prohibited in Scripture: 1. Favoritism is inconsistent with God’s character. Impartiality is an attribute of God. He is absolutely and totally impartial in dealing with people. “For the Lord your God is the God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, mighty, and awe-inspiring God, showing no partiality and taking no bribe” (Deut. 10:17). “For there is no favoritism with God” (Rom. 2:11). “There is no favoritism with him (Eph. 6:9). “Now I truly understand that God doesn’t show favoritism” (Acts 10:34). Showing favoritism is inconsistent with God’s character, antithetical to the gospel, and therefore incompatible with “faith in our glorious Jesus Christ” (Jas. 2:1). 2. Favoritism is contrary to God’s values. James addressed a situation in which believers gave preferential treatment to the rich (2:2-3). What would motivate this kind of behavior? Is it not because these believers valued the rich more than they valued the poor? They would rather have the rich attend their church than the poor, and their treatment of the rich and of the poor reflected their values. James reminded his readers that their values were not God’s values: “Didn’t God choose the poor in this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he has promised to those who love him? Yet you have dishonored the poor” (2:5-6). They were acting in a way that was contrary to God’s values. In a message on the evil of favoritism in the church, John MacArthur said: “We tend to put everyone in some kind of stratified category, higher or lower than other people. It has to do with their looks. It has to do with their wardrobe. It has to do with the kind of car they drive, the kind of house they live in; sometimes it has to do with their race, sometimes with their social status, sometimes outward characteristics of personality. All of those things with God are non-issues. They are of no significance at all. They mean absolutely nothing to Him.” (gty.org) 3. Favoritism is sin. James makes clear that favoritism is not simply disrespectful of people; it is sin against God. “If … you show favoritism, you commit sin” (Jas. 2:9). It is sin because it is contrary to the character and command of God. Because favoritism is sin, there is no place for it in the hearts of God’s people, and certainly no place for it in the church.
There´s a difference between a child of God, a son of God and an adopted son. If we confuse these three stages, then we´ll not understand the high meaning of adoption. The word; "Beloved, now are we the sons of God," is not correct translated in the King James Bible. In the origin text it reads; "Beloved, now, children of God we are." 40:00 - 41:00. Sonship in the New Covenant is not restricted to the Israel family only. It has nothing to do with natural descents to Abraham. To believe that is to doubt Gods revelation to Peter in the Acts chapter 10. "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." v. 34 - 35. Let us not bound the word of God by believing, as the jews of old did, that we, Israel, are the people and the other not.
@@Mypplz Thank you for reminding me that I don´t see, then there´s hope for me to see. "And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind." The Lord bless you!
Election applies to events critical to God's purpose. Abraham and his son were elect... But Bob and Jennifer may not be critical to the plan. But if they believe in Jesus and repent they will be saved. Jesus is The Son of God The Son of man We all are sons of man... Born of a woman. Born again of the Spirit of God I actually got to see my experience...it was powerful! If I didn't repent it would not have happened. Jeremiah 32 35 is clear how important free will is to God.
God wants everyone to be saved. But we can't dilligently work out someone else's salvation with fear and trembling. Without Christ we actually can do nothing. Election is not salvation.
@@hasites14 i hope the pastor listens to this... it's the best Holy Spirit taught truth about the heart of Israel i have ever heard. But discern for yourself. identity, ISRAEL... (mirrored from NEARER PREFECT)
I'm looking forward to watching/listening to this teaching. Thank you, Pastor Charles and God bless you.
Most preachers behind pulpits will "pull" you down into the "pit"
I love the beautiful thread God has woven so intricately into Scripture. O praise His holy name!
I will be sharing this message. Thank you, Pastor Jennings.
Excellent message pastor! Thank you! Looking forward tobthe second part! God bless y'all
Thank you Pastor Jennings! Excellent teaching. ❤
Thank you Pastor Jennings
Wonderful bible study. Thank you Sir.
Amen Pastor Jennings 🙏
Jesus Christ 👑 is our wonderful King
Amen, thank you Pastor!
Excellent message Pastor Jennings. Definitely looking forward to the next one on this topic! May God continue to bless and strengthen you in doing His work! 🙏✝️
Very good teaching!!
Thank you Charles
Thank you for this teaching Pastor Jennings.
God bless
Thank you Truth in History!
I had questions about Paul
and his teachings in Eph.and Gal., concerning who he was really talking
to. God bless you and keep you!!
Profound teaching! Thank you.
Thank You Pastor Jennings with blessings always from Our Lord Jesus Christ!
Hebrews 2:16
For verily " he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.
[17] Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God , to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.
Thank you sir. I prefer to refer to what happened in the Old Covenant as history and not a "story". It's our history not a fables or stories.
The reason why Esau thought very little of his birthright was because he was more happier mixing his seed with the women of peoples who were ''outsiders''
The sons of God are those who are led by the Spirit of God.
Is there a teaching on Zechariah 12? When bringing up the Judah issue. This is what gets brought up alot.
Our Father Issac's bloodline was in Jesus Christ when He was here. We're related to Yahweh. 🙏
For God so loved the world that he gave his ONLY BEGOTTEN SON.
Adam was a created. Christ was born.
Adam never ate of the tree of life.
Adam was just a living soul and never possessed the Holy Spirit.
No human possessed the Holy Spirit within in its fullness til the LORD came in the flesh.
Genesis 3:14-15
King James Version
14 And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:
15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
Who were the serpents seed that bruised the heel of Christ? Paul explains:
1 Thessalonians 2:14-15
King James Version
14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:
Scofield dispensationalism argues that the enemies of mankind are "chosen". But the bible teaches that they are the seed or children of Lucifer.
Kin Copeland FALSE PROPHET! Yes siree! These days their a dime a dozen!
Mishnaic tractate Negaim (“Blemishes”) offers one of the few insights into the rabbinic conceptions of race, or rather, distinct human skin colors. The tractate itself deals with various forms of tzara’at, a leprosy-like disease mentioned in the Torah portions Tazria and Metzora. In this context, Negaim 2:1 explains that “the bright [tzara’at] spot in a germani appears as dull white, and the dull white spot in a kushi appears as bright white. Rabbi Ishmael says the children of Israel … are like boxwood, neither black nor white but of an intermediate shade.”
mishnah deals with a purely clinical challenge - how to diagnose tzara’at on various shades of skin. Yet it can also help us better understand our ancestors’ relationship to the modern concept of “race,” a category they didn’t share.
The specific terms in this passage are interesting. The mishnah states that a Jews’ skin is unlike that of the germani. This term is probably a loanword from the Latin Germanus and refers to a member of a Germanic tribe. The word occurs in the Mishnah only in the above-cited paragraph. In the Jerusalem Talmud, there is a mention of a germani where it stands for a white person who was enslaved by Rabbi Yodan, a sage who lived in the first half of the fourth century in the Land of Israel
Apparently, slavery at this point in Jewish history was not based on race. The rabbinic sages seemed to have followed the Roman model of slavery that did not base slavery on race either. Actually, most of those enslaved by the Romans were white, members of Germanic and Slavic tribes: the word “Slavic” itself was borrowed from the Greek sklábos,midrashic literature also acknowledges the existence of white and Black slaves alike. This de-coupling of the skin color from social hierarchy supports the claim that Mediterranean people of late antiquity did have a different concept of race than we do, if they had any at all. This evidence also indicates that the fusion of skin color and social hierarchies is socially constructed and subject to change.
But the Mishnah does not only differentiate Jews from members of the Germanic tribes. It also states that a Jew’s skin is unlike that of a kushi. This word denotes a person from Kush, a kingdom that centered along the Nile Valley in present-day Sudan, to the south of Egypt. The two civilizations were engaged in warfare, trade and cultural exchange for centuries. Kush existed between c. 1070 BCE until 350 C.E. - that is, including the period of the Mishnah. Later on, the Hebrew word kushi came to refer other Black African peoples, too. For instance, when the original Judeo-Arabic script of the 12th-century philosophical work the Kuzari (1:2) mentions the Habesha[fn]”Habesha” is an ethnic or pan-ethnic identifier frequently employed to refer to Semitic language-speaking peoples mainly found in the highlands of present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea.[/fn] peoples, the Hebrew version of the text introduces them as kushi, even though “Habesha” and “Kushitic” are different markers of identity. The Greeks called Kush “Aethiopia,” which means literally “burnt-face.” Due to Greek cultural dominance, many, including Jewish translators, would later translate kushi as Ethiopian.
Thus, as the Mishnah states, Jews are neither like the germani, nor like the kushi. Instead, the Jews’ skin has, according to the Mishnah, an “intermediate shade.” This rabbinic perception of the Jews’ skin color as brown follows those Egyptian papyri that stated that Jews were honey coloured/fn] The Mishnaic observation also reflects the self-description of other Mediterranean peoples, such as Greeks and Romans, who would describe their skin color as “medius inter nigrum et pallidum” - that is, “halfway between black and pale” (De Physiognomonia liber 88).
Israelites and jews were brown
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Adam means red ruddy. As in able to blush. The Israelites were white not brown or black. The Egyptians were white as well back in ancient times.
26:20 - 27:00. For those who have no witness to these words of God hating Esau, I´ll give a short explanation of the opposite. As it´s impossible for good parents to hate their own children, regardless how bad their deeds are, so is it impossible for God to hate any living soul of his creation. "For God so loved the world....." Why do he love the world? For he IS Love and genuine love cannot, cannot, cannot hate! There´s NO exceptions to Gods love to the world whatever. To tell otherwise will lead us in to the same predicament as Eliphaz the Temanite in Job 42:7. To say, "but not Esau", will lead us into the same pit of unbelief as the opposition to Jesus was fallen in.
What then is the error? Teaching the letter of the Bible will result in human reasoning, grooping in darkness and not understanding the wonderful spiritual meaning, God hath hidden under the letter, not to be understood by the wise, but by the ignorant.
Thus you do not hate your parents, wife and children as Jesus told you to do and I do´nt believe the preacher do it either. So God does not hate any living creature, wether it be a deadly Cobra or an fleshly Esau. God only hates that which Esau represents, the work of the flesh. God did not hate Pharaoh, he was just a toll in Gods hands, so even Esau was a toll in Gods hands to bring Jacob to the high destination God had prepared for him. God never hates his tools, he uses them to the glory of his name.
As God is light and there is no darkness in him, so God is love, and there is no hate in him, no, not even towards Esau. Blessed be his name for his love to the world, and be sure, Esau is part of the world. "O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!"
In the New Testament, Paul demands active unity in the church, a unity that explicitly joins together differing ethnic groups because of their common identity in Christ. Paul proclaims that, in Christ, believers form a brand-new humanity. The old barrier of hostility and division between ethnic groups has been demolished by the cross; and now, all peoples are to be one in Christ (Rom. 4; Gal. 3-4; Col. 3; Eph. 2).
Christians of other ethnicities aren’t just equal to us; they are joined to us.
Paul insists that the primary identity of Christians is to be based on their union with Christ-not on traditional sociological, geographical, and ethnic connections. Again, the implications are profound. Christians of other races aren’t just equal to us; they are joined to us. As Christians, we’re all part of the same body, united by the presence of the same Holy Spirit who indwells us all. We’re not just friends or fellow worshipers in the same religion, but brothers and sisters in the same family.
John gives us a glimpse of the people of God at the consummation of history, describing them as people from every tribe and language and people and nation (Rev. 5:9; 7:9; 10:11; 11:9; 13:7; 14:6; 17:15). This fourfold formula of tribe, language, people, and nation stresses the ethnic diversity of the people of God who will worship around the throne. It’s a picture of the climactic kingdom of Christ, and, as such, provides a model for us to strive toward. John clearly sees the kingdom of Christ as a multi-ethnic congregation. We must make this a reality because THIS is our destiny. Our cultures and labels we give ourselves will no longer matter in the world to come. The old earth will pass away.
Favortism among people is a SIN and likned to the law breakers of old.
Favoritism, according to Merriam-Webster, is “the unfair practice of treating some people better than others.” The Greek word translated favoritism in James 2 literally means to “receive according to the face.” In other words, to show favoritism is to make judgments about people on the basis of their outward appearance. Here are three reasons why showing favoritism is prohibited in Scripture:
1. Favoritism is inconsistent with God’s character.
Impartiality is an attribute of God. He is absolutely and totally impartial in dealing with people.
“For the Lord your God is the God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, mighty, and awe-inspiring God, showing no partiality and taking no bribe” (Deut. 10:17).
“For there is no favoritism with God” (Rom. 2:11).
“There is no favoritism with him (Eph. 6:9).
“Now I truly understand that God doesn’t show favoritism” (Acts 10:34).
Showing favoritism is inconsistent with God’s character, antithetical to the gospel, and therefore incompatible with “faith in our glorious Jesus Christ” (Jas. 2:1).
2. Favoritism is contrary to God’s values.
James addressed a situation in which believers gave preferential treatment to the rich (2:2-3). What would motivate this kind of behavior? Is it not because these believers valued the rich more than they valued the poor? They would rather have the rich attend their church than the poor, and their treatment of the rich and of the poor reflected their values.
James reminded his readers that their values were not God’s values: “Didn’t God choose the poor in this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom that he has promised to those who love him? Yet you have dishonored the poor” (2:5-6). They were acting in a way that was contrary to God’s values.
In a message on the evil of favoritism in the church, John MacArthur said: “We tend to put everyone in some kind of stratified category, higher or lower than other people. It has to do with their looks. It has to do with their wardrobe. It has to do with the kind of car they drive, the kind of house they live in; sometimes it has to do with their race, sometimes with their social status, sometimes outward characteristics of personality. All of those things with God are non-issues. They are of no significance at all. They mean absolutely nothing to Him.” (gty.org)
3. Favoritism is sin.
James makes clear that favoritism is not simply disrespectful of people; it is sin against God. “If … you show favoritism, you commit sin” (Jas. 2:9). It is sin because it is contrary to the character and command of God. Because favoritism is sin, there is no place for it in the hearts of God’s people, and certainly no place for it in the church.
More nonsense.
You are just repeating the satanic marxist religion of multiculturalism.
There´s a difference between a child of God, a son of God and an adopted son. If we confuse these three stages, then we´ll not understand the high meaning of adoption.
The word; "Beloved, now are we the sons of God," is not correct translated in the King James Bible. In the origin text it reads; "Beloved, now, children of God we are."
40:00 - 41:00. Sonship in the New Covenant is not restricted to the Israel family only. It has nothing to do with natural descents to Abraham. To believe that is to doubt Gods
revelation to Peter in the Acts chapter 10. "Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that
feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." v. 34 - 35. Let us not bound the word of God by believing, as the jews of old did, that we, Israel, are the
people and the other not.
You have a faulty understanding of Acts 10. There’s a lot of teachings here that touch on that subject.
@@Mypplz Thank you for reminding me that I don´t see, then there´s hope for me to see. "And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind." The Lord bless you!
@@anders888 I’ve had to relearn a lot of things! But I’m so thankful!
Election applies to events critical to God's purpose. Abraham and his son were elect... But Bob and Jennifer may not be critical to the plan. But if they believe in Jesus and repent they will be saved.
Jesus is The Son of God
The Son of man
We all are sons of man... Born of a woman.
Born again of the Spirit of God
I actually got to see my experience...it was powerful!
If I didn't repent it would not have happened.
Jeremiah 32 35 is clear how important free will is to God.
It is not only about personal,individual salvation
God wants everyone to be saved.
But we can't dilligently work out someone else's salvation with fear and trembling. Without Christ we actually can do nothing.
Election is not salvation.
@@wesfax1 that's what I said ...not only about salvation...He elected people to help to bring His kingdom to earth.
@@hasites14 i hope the pastor listens to this... it's the best Holy Spirit taught truth about the heart of Israel i have ever heard.
But discern for yourself.
identity, ISRAEL... (mirrored from NEARER PREFECT)