bruh..... you can actually sing pretty dang good. I use melodyne and auto-tune, but respectively have the confidence to sing my live gigs and know I am an "OK" singer. You just crushed my dreams. fml
It's refreshing to see someone giving praise to melodyne. I really liked what you said about it empowering you to sing your own songs. So much of what we do in the studio is about enhancing the quality of a performance anyway. Anything from EQ to compression or just plain old volume automation. I mean who cares about Britney Spears' vocal chops? Why not just appreciate Max Martin instead?
Really great video showing the power of Melodyne. I am a singer like you, but I'm a great arranger and composer, and I've done some pitch corrected recordings with my voice. However, I haven't been able to use Melodyne yet. I used Sonar's V-vocal, which sort of works, but it added a lot of artifacts. One thing I hoped you would show is how to add artificial vibrato with Melodyne. I think there should be a Melodyne analysis of pro singer's vocal template, so that you could pick a favored vocalist and it generally tries to make you sound like that! I'm over the top, but I'm serious!
Hilarious... well done to prove a point! Haha. I love your channel by the way. So much good learning that has helped out my songwriting and guitar. Thanks!
great job on your tune.i get to use melodyne often but sometime i need to use revoice4 especially for phrasing. i heard that meldyne has inculcated this type of module but i have not tried it yet but i'll try it on my next update.
Nice stuff. Maybe I'll have to resort to that kind of thing, since although I've sung in semi-professional choirs, I'm not much of a solo vocalist at all. The thing about triple-tracking vocals reminded me of the old saying "What's worse than a recorder? Two recorders" (the recorder being traditional every child's instrument in Germany). It's so true, since recorders are relatively poor in overtones, so unless played in perfect unison, which is hard, two recorders produce really nasty beating effects. But the extension that three recorders is even worse, doesn't hold. Three even out a lot better than two.
Big Jake what mode or modes are used to write angry songs? I've also have tried to write songs about hard work, the physicality of lift that barge and tote that bale. Your view would be great.
It's important to note that tuning software is not magic. If you don't sound half decent, no amount of pitch correction will help. Also, you weren't compressing and using effects on the untuned part, so it's not a fair comparison.
He does a good job doing what he is doing, sound engineering and offering clear explanation to guys like me who want to get better results mixing tracks.
No it ain't, bedroom music is supposed to be unique, honest and real. This is just teaching a bunch of younger bedroom musicians that it's "better" to have your music sound like a cheap disney rip-off, and anyone with an ear can HEAR this shit is going on. Take the knowledge from this video and use it to get better at singing, use melodyne to observe your notes and use THAT knowledge to figure out what can be improved. ESPECIALLY if you're making pop/ rnb/ lofi shit.
EDIT* if you're going for that intentional autotune sound, then that's fuckin sick. fuck it up! that's an aesthetic choice. but doing this faked good singing bullshit just sounds so transparently bullshit to anyone who knows better.
Two little things! 1- If you honestly think I sound better without pitch correction, then you probably won't make it far as a choir director, producer or, acapella member. Being that out of tune and wonky with pitch does NOT OCCUR at professional levels of vocal performance. There's a reason why, it's because most people don't like the sound. If you do, congrats- you're special! But sadly the rest of the world wants to hear well performed vocals. 2- At parts of this video, the file i'm working with looks like a STEREO file. This is because I actually rendered out the stems and imported them into a new project in order to mix and make this video. In practice, I recorded in MONO and panned everything to stereo. Also, melodyne won't play with time changes like the slow down I automated at the end, so I was pretty much forced to take my recorded tracks and render them into a brand new set.
Well, some people just want to hear mistakes. I think sometimes with things that are too perfect, they can sound boring. I think that's why Ritchie Blackmore criticized Joe Satriani's playing in an interview. I find your chord progression very interesting. Can you do a video explaining your choice of chords?
@@potatosan4250 This is a version of melodyne that came bundled with one of my old interfaces - it isn't new at all but does have the polyphonic feature. I'm pretty sure the newest versions WAY MORE capable than what I demonstrated here
Love your videos man, you've helped me make sense of theory like no one else ever could. I have a question you might could make another video on. How do you intentionally sing in a certain key? I can tell if I'm singing in key with what I'm playing but that's from adjusting my voice to sound good with my music. I've always wrote my music first and then vocals later. Wich I realise now that's probably why I struggle writing vocals because I'm not writing the melody first. How do I know and intentionally sing in a certain key?
Jake, you have an amazing ability to explain and demonstrate the concepts you are trying to get across. I have learned so much from you. I am 60 years old and have been playing music all my life but have never been in a band. I was going to say that you bridge the gap - but really you fill in the void for people like me who are self taught experienced players who are really yearning to learn more but are too old or self conscious to get more advanced training. You obviously have a full grasp of theory and the gift of breaking it down into manageable chunks that people like me can understand and digest. You have certainly opened up my mind and expanded my abilities. You are a down to earth learning experience and I sincerely thank you for all your hard work. I hope to make you proud someday!
I’m totally all for pitch correction and will use it, but I’ve loved so many “amateurish” performances with so much character, like the unedited part of that intro, that I wish the average modern ear was more used to that raw sound. Not even just unedited vocals, but vocalists who aren’t world class...I just like that shit sometimes idk
Agreed- sometimes, I must tune the note. Other times, it would be a sin to remove the humanity. There is no "one size fits all" rule to pitch correction, it can be wielded for good or evil.
I think is different when the vocalist go off pitch in a emotional track i hear the error as an emotion and when the vocalist sing all over the place and just dance to pretend he/she isnt singing that bad.
First, as a Berklee-trained vocalist, I don’t really have a huge problem with the way the unedited audio sounded. Much more interested in the how you wrote and arranged this given that you got this kind of Billy Joel thing going on. I would love a vocal arranging follow-up video.
I’m a Theoretically Trained Forensic Astronomer with a degree in Fully Semi Automatic Cosmotology and I agree... errr disagree... uhhhh... you know, the thing!
I wish more people understood what you said: 1 - If you miss the note by more than half step, you'r probably not a singer 2 - Tune correction programs works if you know how to sing decently, they're not magic tools.
This comment and this video here: ruclips.net/video/05hTQC1CZko/видео.html Are Really The Best Starting Guide to not only using autotune, but Also to Knowing Knowledge Of Autotune In General. Wish more people had seen this. 👍
@@myoriginalname an really true musician would also know that, not like the others comments I seen on this topic, thanks kind sir of this quote to set the table. 👍🏻🎶
Melodyne isnt automatic, you have to actually drag each note to the correct place, which is why it is so superior to autotune. It also preserves the natural sound of the singer instead of making it sounds all robotic like autotune
"When it tries to average the tone, it ends up dividing by zero." I don't have the writing skills to express my laughter when I read that. Programmers and math nerds will get it. I'm not sure about anybody else. :-)
@@DodgaOfficial autotune has knobs that let you control the human feel (flatness, vibrato, etc) and there’s even the option to do it manually so there’s no sense to what you said...
FYI, classical voice leading rules for “figured bass” don’t really apply to most actual melodies. the voices in basso continuo tend to mostly move by stepwise motion and never really range more than a fifth (unless its the bass); this excludes so many pieces of even classical music. In practice classical composers tend to think about voice leading rules vertically (e.g. chord movements) rather than for each voice, and even then they commonly break these rules. so feel free to orchestrate how you want!
Just a quick note about that "gonna bust out a song in the cafeteria." So I went to a music oriented highschool in germany (musisches gymnasium) and one year we were doing the musical my fair lady. We basically involved the entire school our orchestra, choir and theater group all working together none stop on that musical. And yes it actually happened quite often that we would just bust out singing one of the songs and the entire cafeteria sang along. It was pretty cool tbh.
"You can't Melodyne a cracked voice." NICE. Bruh I wish I had some kind of Melodyne-ish plugin for the software I use. (I probably do but haven't been able to find it yet.) On the other hand though I've really had to figure out how to sing SO! :D If I ever do find a plugin for it, I'll have less work to do. Thankfully all I'm singing right now is Skyrim bard songs so as long as I sound better-or-equal-to the vanilla performers, I'm doing okayish.
In 1966 when Brian created Pet Sounds, technology like this hadn't even been dreamed of. Just demonstrates his production capabilities and what great singers the Beach Boys were.
The beach boys are not always in tune. Quite the contrary. There not great singers individually (except maybe Carl), but together it's magic and the little off notes aren't noticeable too much. Plus: Brian's used a lot of pitch correction on his recent work.
Dude... you sound WAY BETTER using no modifications and your own natural and beautiful voice. Software modification to make a voice sound better is not what makes a singer. The natural ebb and flow of an organic voice makes a singer true.
After reading through the comments, I realized that most people don't have the ear to tell if the vocals are off pitch. While simultaneously others are horrified by the slightest off note. (I've got a friend like that.) This method ensures that everyone is happy. Thanks so much for making this video, I really learned a lot.
This took me the longest to understand! I make beats and I would’ve a mate with perfect pitch tell me there’s something out of key and it would frustrate me so much because i could’ve never hear what he was hearing...over time my ears have gotten better that I’m still bad at hearing singers ahahah
I can clearly hear it's off pitch, yet I weirdly like it, except for a few horrible moments. Maybe I've been listening to too much jazz haha When everything is too perfect, it loses a bit of character.
This proved my point I was explaining a couple days ago to my colleague. Auto tune isn’t necessarily what makes someone that can’t sing sound amazing, it’s more about layering a bunch of tracks of a certain vocal 🤯 cuz it sounded fine without pitch correction, especially to someone’s untrained ear 👂
13:07 "If my bass part sounds louder than the rest of the voices, imagine how weird that would sound" Yeah that'd just be Kokomo or any other Beach Boys song led by Mike Love
Super interesting. I picked up singing while under house arrest, but I didn't think about recording anything yet (my tone is horrendous). Your video gave me a good overview of the pitch correction process. Thanks dude.
C'mon now. You're being too nice. The whole point of this video is that you can cheat using pitch correction to sound like an actual professional singer with amazing control of their voice, which most people who use it are not. He's wildly out of tune all over the original performance, he acknowledges it himself.
I agree, if he actually put the effort into getting better takes and understanding what his actual issue is (he's just commonly flat, especially in the lower-register parts) and mitigating that with practice, he'd have something so much better than the pitch corrected version, something that DOESN'T sound like a straight to DVD disney soundtrack rip off.
@@matturner6890 Yeah he's out of tune but it still sounds better. Sounds like a bunch of dudes sitting around singing together. Being slightly out of tune is similar to purposefully adding white noise to your track, it makes it sound warmer and more relaxed. It's not "being nice" it's having an opinion about which sounds better.
I can't tell you how many times I get stuck or give up because my performance isn't up to my standard. It gives me so much anxiety. Your confidence to show your "pretty bad" performance to the audience and confidently walk through how to make it sound better is SO encouraging to me. Thank you!
Great video Jake. As a lead singer in my much younger days, back in the early 80s, your voice is what set you apart from everyone else. Today, wow! So many possibilities and options. You actually have a decent voice when you stay in your natural range. Unfortunately, your range is like halfway between most natural melody lines, but I'm sure you already know that. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this process because you encourage people to expand their potential and try new things. Your descriptions are hilarious and true, yes most people will notice, but unless they are expecting a professional performance they will usually be more optimistic. Lol
Hey, I've watched the "same type" of videos from many other big youtubers and you always do the best job. With this video, and others. You are super knowledgeable.
All the "dislikes" are from Maluma, Bad Bunny, Paulina Rubio, Britney Spears, Daddy Yankee, Nicky Jam, J Balvin, Don Omar, Wisin & Yandel, Ozuna, Tito El Bambino, Pitbull, Nicki Minaj, etc.
This is great. But when I googled Melodyne and it showed a whooping 699€ price to me... ooof!!! Maybe you could reach the same effect with FL Studios Newtone?
Pitch correction can't help a singer with bad tone quality. Luckily, the person in the video has good time quality. The unedited version is literally 90-95% of the way there.
"sometimes good enough is good enough" unironically good words to live by. Our own perfectionism sometimes really gets in the way of learning, improving and - most importantly - getting shit done
Ok, how many people have ears good enough to notice that Jake's singing wasn't the most pristine? I couldn't, though I will admit I have a tin ear. Even when the effects were turned off I found it quite passable.
It's a bit more distinguishable when you wear earphones in a quiet room. But yeah, I think most untrained people who don't have perfect pitch will probably not find it that bad.
Back in the day singers had to sing live with reasonable consistency to even get a record deal...that's why a lot of the old stuff was good. Then came stage one of correction technology which allowed poor singers to actually sound pretty good on recordings. However, not live, which is why many acts sounded pretty poor live, and often used the excuse that the singer was 'emotionally drained' or 'tired' from a long tour, or was drunk LOL Then stage two of correction technology where they use all kinds of software and techniques to make a live singer sound good. That said, there has always been suspicions with many acts about how 'live' the sound was, back in the day of singing to a tape machine. I can remember in the 80s some guy on his own in a pub singing live with a whole band and at times almost orchestration via a tape machine turning away at the back. At least he played his guitar live (well, some parts LOL). I may sound a bit of a hippy, but I do think that music has lost a lot of its soul and meaning...
you sound pretty fine bruh, you might not feel comfortable as the front man, but you clearly have a lot of what's required, timing, proper annunciation, tonal control and support. clever video but you over played your terribleness :)
Exactly. Guitars dont sound distorted or loud when played naturally. And we have zero issues with guitarists using different tools to get a cool sounding tone. Stop pretending that there are different rules for vocalists. I do agree with doing your best to practice getting the vocals as close to pitch perfect as possible. However,- Nobody is perfect everytime. Its our jobs as producers to make everything in the final production sound great. So we will continue to use tools that are available to us to achieve that goal.
@@lionsdenstudio4934 Sounds a little like an excuse bringing in guitar into this. You change the tone of the electric guitar, not the actual note being played. The note will always be the same. Tone, effects can't save you if you can't play in tune. You're making it sound that guitarists just put on an effect that keeps them in tune. I know you probably didn't mean that but it sounds like that.
I think we should make fun of people who use pitch correction. Maybe one day they will teach themselves to sing better. Although Justin Bieber sang fo so long and he is still not doing good. Besides perfect isn't better. It doesn't sound unique.
Hey Jake, I'd love to see an analysis video on "I'm going slightly mad" from queen. This song is really interesting and has a beautiful weirdness going on. :)
One observation. You didn't need to record stereo files, mono would work exactly the same in your example. It saves resources and processing overhead. A stereo file from a mono Mic source is basically two copies of the same thing. As you go on to double and then pan hard left and right effectively only one half of the stereo file is used making the other half redundant.
Huh I agree 100% - I don't know why it defaulted to the stereo view when I recorded in Mono. I think my preferences changed when I updated ableton and I didn't realize it!
oh wait i solved it lol! I actaully DID record in MONO like I suspect, but I rendered out the individual stems in stereo to place into a new setlist for mixing/filming/etc. I didn't mention it but I had to automate a time change at the end for the slowdown, and melodyne won't work with timechanges so I basically imported everything into a new set, and thats where the stereo tracks came from :P
I’ve just learned more about producing music in the last hour of watching your content than I have in the last 23 years of being alive, you are amazing
On top of all content you've put in here, I can't imagine how much more was in order to first plan all of it and wrap it all in this fantastically holistic video, with the final perspective(s) in mind. You're my bridge to what really can be done from home, and yet reach out to what comes out the professional studios. Maybe I joined too late, but ever since I did, I'm endlessly grateful, and will remain forever one (maybe not most invested, yet) of your patrons exactly for that humility you bring out with, all this so valuable content, in its rightful context. Much love and respect from a Bulgarian fan in London. Thank you, and keep remaining you 🙏🤘🤗💓
Honestly I consider that F# to be a II but I thought calling it V/V would placate the academic types out there. If it resolves to the primary chord, I'll parse it as a secondary dominant, but if it doesn't like in this case, I'll prolly just call it a borrowed chord.
lol the unedited audio isnt that bad
Sounds like that group of people who are on their way to a party and started singing on the way.
just a little off-pitch, but for me it's okay
Preferable even.
I was hoping for something terrible so I could have hope for mixing my voice. Instead, this dude turned out to be a solid karaoke singer.
you are not hearing the soprano part
The highest harmony shouting in the unedited version made me crack up, great video!
u changed my whole disposition on music production thank you
The C diminished seventh chord made me cry 😢😍
I never get time for long YT videos, but I make time for yours because all of them are so enlightening lol
bruh.....
you can actually sing pretty dang good. I use melodyne and auto-tune, but respectively have the confidence to sing my live gigs and know I am an "OK" singer. You just crushed my dreams.
fml
It's refreshing to see someone giving praise to melodyne. I really liked what you said about it empowering you to sing your own songs. So much of what we do in the studio is about enhancing the quality of a performance anyway. Anything from EQ to compression or just plain old volume automation. I mean who cares about Britney Spears' vocal chops? Why not just appreciate Max Martin instead?
Your intro was worthy of a 1980s.... Saturday morning. Cereal Commercial..lol
Good stuff man. Love the videos
Really great video showing the power of Melodyne. I am a singer like you, but I'm a great arranger and composer, and I've done some pitch corrected recordings with my voice. However, I haven't been able to use Melodyne yet. I used Sonar's V-vocal, which sort of works, but it added a lot of artifacts. One thing I hoped you would show is how to add artificial vibrato with Melodyne. I think there should be a Melodyne analysis of pro singer's vocal template, so that you could pick a favored vocalist and it generally tries to make you sound like that! I'm over the top, but I'm serious!
Such a great voice your have.
So helpful! I learned a lot 🎶🎵
Hilarious... well done to prove a point! Haha. I love your channel by the way. So much good learning that has helped out my songwriting and guitar. Thanks!
great job on your tune.i get to use melodyne often but sometime i need to use revoice4 especially for phrasing. i heard that meldyne has inculcated this type of module but i have not tried it yet but i'll try it on my next update.
Great job!
Thanks for sharing 👍🏻
nice intro acapella
Nice stuff. Maybe I'll have to resort to that kind of thing, since although I've sung in semi-professional choirs, I'm not much of a solo vocalist at all. The thing about triple-tracking vocals reminded me of the old saying "What's worse than a recorder? Two recorders" (the recorder being traditional every child's instrument in Germany). It's so true, since recorders are relatively poor in overtones, so unless played in perfect unison, which is hard, two recorders produce really nasty beating effects. But the extension that three recorders is even worse, doesn't hold. Three even out a lot better than two.
Genius
Wonderful video, love you
There’s hope for me after all
Also ayeee I got Reason too
Big Jake what mode or modes are used to write angry songs? I've also have tried to write songs about hard work, the physicality of lift that barge and tote that bale. Your view would be great.
Not bad even without
Yesterday i got stung by a 3:07
It's important to note that tuning software is not magic. If you don't sound half decent, no amount of pitch correction will help. Also, you weren't compressing and using effects on the untuned part, so it's not a fair comparison.
I thought the intro was the whole video lmao
Dude you sound way better unedited than like 3/4 of every local band ever.
True THAT!
I expected way worse honestly, and the song itself is really really cool, great job :D
ahaha yes me too!!
it was ok in human mode !
I though he was gonna sound like me 😂😂😢
Ahah agreed 100% and the song is great ahah
Yeah dude, self deprecate much 😜
Forget singing, go into announcing. You definitely have a radio voice.
I was thinking he auto tunes his voice lol
You're quite right
He does a good job doing what he is doing, sound engineering and offering clear explanation to guys like me who want to get better results mixing tracks.
That's what everyone tells me and I'm sick of it. He probably heard that comment a thousand times before in his life as well.
@@ImNotQualifiedToSayThisBut The closest i've gotten is getting told I have a great face for radio.
Jake: ...We can actually get rid of all these little modulations.
*dying modulations sounds*
16:43
NUUUᴜᴜᴜᵤᵤᵤᵤ
Lol
lol
LMAO
I was thinking the same exact thing lol that shit was hilarious
great content! thanks
ok
Why hello there, Mr. Legend!
Wow didn't expect to see you here! I just remember your name from journey which was a total bop haha
@k-391 Never stop learning!
@K-391 haha hey bro!
I can't stress enough how well presented this video is. As a person who used to make "homemade" music covers, this is a masterclass.
Epic intro!!
Watch the intro of his video about polymeters, It's amazing :D
Jake, you are the greatest gift to bedroom musicians from all over the world. Great video as always.
Amen lol
No it ain't, bedroom music is supposed to be unique, honest and real. This is just teaching a bunch of younger bedroom musicians that it's "better" to have your music sound like a cheap disney rip-off, and anyone with an ear can HEAR this shit is going on.
Take the knowledge from this video and use it to get better at singing, use melodyne to observe your notes and use THAT knowledge to figure out what can be improved. ESPECIALLY if you're making pop/ rnb/ lofi shit.
EDIT* if you're going for that intentional autotune sound, then that's fuckin sick. fuck it up! that's an aesthetic choice. but doing this faked good singing bullshit just sounds so transparently bullshit to anyone who knows better.
@@AnotherWorldYT yo why are you so heated bro LOL
@@AnotherWorldYT L
Two little things!
1- If you honestly think I sound better without pitch correction, then you probably won't make it far as a choir director, producer or, acapella member. Being that out of tune and wonky with pitch does NOT OCCUR at professional levels of vocal performance. There's a reason why, it's because most people don't like the sound. If you do, congrats- you're special! But sadly the rest of the world wants to hear well performed vocals.
2- At parts of this video, the file i'm working with looks like a STEREO file. This is because I actually rendered out the stems and imported them into a new project in order to mix and make this video. In practice, I recorded in MONO and panned everything to stereo. Also, melodyne won't play with time changes like the slow down I automated at the end, so I was pretty much forced to take my recorded tracks and render them into a brand new set.
Is this the full version of melodyne? Thanks for putting in so much work once again!
P.s.Also love how you used omnipresent in there too!
Well, some people just want to hear mistakes. I think sometimes with things that are too perfect, they can sound boring. I think that's why Ritchie Blackmore criticized Joe Satriani's playing in an interview.
I find your chord progression very interesting. Can you do a video explaining your choice of chords?
@@potatosan4250 This is a version of melodyne that came bundled with one of my old interfaces - it isn't new at all but does have the polyphonic feature. I'm pretty sure the newest versions WAY MORE capable than what I demonstrated here
Love your videos man, you've helped me make sense of theory like no one else ever could. I have a question you might could make another video on. How do you intentionally sing in a certain key? I can tell if I'm singing in key with what I'm playing but that's from adjusting my voice to sound good with my music. I've always wrote my music first and then vocals later. Wich I realise now that's probably why I struggle writing vocals because I'm not writing the melody first. How do I know and intentionally sing in a certain key?
@@SignalsMusicStudio Sweet! I got one that came for free with nectar 3 when It first came out so ima see what I can do. Thanks!
Jake, you have an amazing ability to explain and demonstrate the concepts you are trying to get across. I have learned so much from you. I am 60 years old and have been playing music all my life but have never been in a band. I was going to say that you bridge the gap - but really you fill in the void for people like me who are self taught experienced players who are really yearning to learn more but are too old or self conscious to get more advanced training. You obviously have a full grasp of theory and the gift of breaking it down into manageable chunks that people like me can understand and digest. You have certainly opened up my mind and expanded my abilities. You are a down to earth learning experience and I sincerely thank you for all your hard work. I hope to make you proud someday!
Pentatonix wants to know your location.
Okay you got me. 2 months later you made me laugh in the bathroom so hard the stall next to me asked if I was okay
@@Tacospaceman Glad to have contributed to such a biblical laughter!
Don't they know? It's...HERE. How dumb ARE these guys?? :)
Pentatonix does not need it...............yet.
Pentatonix uses melodyne and autotune.
I’m totally all for pitch correction and will use it, but I’ve loved so many “amateurish” performances with so much character, like the unedited part of that intro, that I wish the average modern ear was more used to that raw sound. Not even just unedited vocals, but vocalists who aren’t world class...I just like that shit sometimes idk
Agreed- sometimes, I must tune the note. Other times, it would be a sin to remove the humanity. There is no "one size fits all" rule to pitch correction, it can be wielded for good or evil.
@@SignalsMusicStudio the force is strong with this one...
@@zac3392 The force has a special affinity for an individual such as he.
Jake... I am your father
I think is different when the vocalist go off pitch in a emotional track i hear the error as an emotion and when the vocalist sing all over the place and just dance to pretend he/she isnt singing that bad.
this was awesome!
The quality of this content is unbelievable. I do not know why the algorithm isn't treating it better, but hope this comment & like helps.
First, as a Berklee-trained vocalist, I don’t really have a huge problem with the way the unedited audio sounded. Much more interested in the how you wrote and arranged this given that you got this kind of Billy Joel thing going on. I would love a vocal arranging follow-up video.
I am a Churklee-trained vocalist and i disagree
i'm a completely shit vocalist and i do agree
I'm a vocally-trained Wendy's and I agree
I’m a Theoretically Trained Forensic Astronomer with a degree in Fully Semi Automatic Cosmotology and I agree... errr disagree... uhhhh... you know, the thing!
I'm a pharmaceutical - trained nuclear janitor from harvard and I agree.
I wish more people understood what you said:
1 - If you miss the note by more than half step, you'r probably not a singer
2 - Tune correction programs works if you know how to sing decently, they're not magic tools.
I guess I'll wait until they perfect the magic tool.
This comment and this video here: ruclips.net/video/05hTQC1CZko/видео.html
Are Really The Best Starting Guide to not only using autotune, but Also to Knowing Knowledge Of Autotune In General. Wish more people had seen this. 👍
It’s just like using the pen stabilizer in procreate. It will help with your line art but it won’t make your art good if your art sucks.
@@myoriginalname an really true musician would also know that, not like the others comments I seen on this topic, thanks kind sir of this quote to set the table. 👍🏻🎶
Even missing notes by a half step is considered really bad singing. Imagine more than that lol 😶😶
I sing so poorly that even the pitch corrector gives up.
When it tries to average the tone, it ends up dividing by zero.
Well, I sure as hell hopes that it knows how and when to divide by zero if it's doing it.
Melodyne isnt automatic, you have to actually drag each note to the correct place, which is why it is so superior to autotune. It also preserves the natural sound of the singer instead of making it sounds all robotic like autotune
"When it tries to average the tone, it ends up dividing by zero." I don't have the writing skills to express my laughter when I read that. Programmers and math nerds will get it. I'm not sure about anybody else. :-)
@@DodgaOfficial autotune has knobs that let you control the human feel (flatness, vibrato, etc) and there’s even the option to do it manually so there’s no sense to what you said...
@@phillipzx3754 I read the original comment and was chuckling so much I had to "rewind" the video. (|
FYI, classical voice leading rules for “figured bass” don’t really apply to most actual melodies. the voices in basso continuo tend to mostly move by stepwise motion and never really range more than a fifth (unless its the bass); this excludes so many pieces of even classical music. In practice classical composers tend to think about voice leading rules vertically (e.g. chord movements) rather than for each voice, and even then they commonly break these rules. so feel free to orchestrate how you want!
i came here to say this
Just a quick note about that "gonna bust out a song in the cafeteria." So I went to a music oriented highschool in germany (musisches gymnasium) and one year we were doing the musical my fair lady. We basically involved the entire school our orchestra, choir and theater group all working together none stop on that musical. And yes it actually happened quite often that we would just bust out singing one of the songs and the entire cafeteria sang along. It was pretty cool tbh.
Man I died of laughter on the opening sequence. I love it.
The difference in the beginning is that of a pro choir and a high school choir.
Possibly the best tutorial I've ever watched -- well done, sir!
Without melodyne it ain't bad either
even without the pitch correction, just at the very beginning of the video, it still sounded really good
Yeah I agree
The higher voices were horrible though 🥺😢🤣
The very beginning of the video is already pitch corrected
@@augusto7681 yeah i know, but i was referring the part where he gets rid of the correction. i feel like that was obvious
"You can't Melodyne a cracked voice." NICE.
Bruh I wish I had some kind of Melodyne-ish plugin for the software I use. (I probably do but haven't been able to find it yet.) On the other hand though I've really had to figure out how to sing SO! :D If I ever do find a plugin for it, I'll have less work to do. Thankfully all I'm singing right now is Skyrim bard songs so as long as I sound better-or-equal-to the vanilla performers, I'm doing okayish.
Tbh even if you using pitch corection/autotune you still have to learn vocal technique.
Just don't out of tune or tempo too far
Brian Wilson did all of this with 1 working ear.
In 1966 when Brian created Pet Sounds, technology like this hadn't even been dreamed of. Just demonstrates his production capabilities and what great singers the Beach Boys were.
The beach boys are not always in tune. Quite the contrary. There not great singers individually (except maybe Carl), but together it's magic and the little off notes aren't noticeable too much.
Plus: Brian's used a lot of pitch correction on his recent work.
@@StatusQuonald they’re all pretty decent singers, Carl and Brian would be the best out of them all. Brian didn’t use any pitch correction back then.
Don't mind me just gonna listen to the intro song for the 12th time in a row
it's SO catchy
Yeah man, he should make a full song out of it xD
It got stuck in my head :(
16:08 did he actually say... No he didn't. Oops
I live for that “I have not been doing fine / I’ve relied on Melodyne” rhyme.
(and the little Broadway vibe at the end of it)
Rhyme
absolutely dynamite intro hahaha
also... it's comical how different our vocal ranges are...
The unedited sounded like something from a theatrical music album something like a pirateship sea shanty
Dude... you sound WAY BETTER using no modifications and your own natural and beautiful voice. Software modification to make a voice sound better is not what makes a singer. The natural ebb and flow of an organic voice makes a singer true.
After reading through the comments, I realized that most people don't have the ear to tell if the vocals are off pitch.
While simultaneously others are horrified by the slightest off note. (I've got a friend like that.)
This method ensures that everyone is happy.
Thanks so much for making this video, I really learned a lot.
I’ve got a good ear but not always good at singing what’s in my brain. It makes me feel like a jerk sometimes.
This took me the longest to understand! I make beats and I would’ve a mate with perfect pitch tell me there’s something out of key and it would frustrate me so much because i could’ve never hear what he was hearing...over time my ears have gotten better that I’m still bad at hearing singers ahahah
Music is about feeling
I can clearly hear it's off pitch, yet I weirdly like it, except for a few horrible moments. Maybe I've been listening to too much jazz haha
When everything is too perfect, it loses a bit of character.
I mean clearly the soprano and the low voice were not perfect. But it was still pretty overal and it still sounded okay.
"I can take my main vocals and listen to them all on their own"
12:50 *"OOOOO"*
This proved my point I was explaining a couple days ago to my colleague. Auto tune isn’t necessarily what makes someone that can’t sing sound amazing, it’s more about layering a bunch of tracks of a certain vocal 🤯 cuz it sounded fine without pitch correction, especially to someone’s untrained ear 👂
13:07 "If my bass part sounds louder than the rest of the voices, imagine how weird that would sound"
Yeah that'd just be Kokomo or any other Beach Boys song led by Mike Love
You are awesome bro!
Thanks for this tutorials. You are an expert on this.
Super interesting. I picked up singing while under house arrest, but I didn't think about recording anything yet (my tone is horrendous). Your video gave me a good overview of the pitch correction process. Thanks dude.
I woke up with this song stuck in my head for some reason, now I have to watch the video again
The un-pitch corrected audio actually sounded better! 😂
C'mon now. You're being too nice. The whole point of this video is that you can cheat using pitch correction to sound like an actual professional singer with amazing control of their voice, which most people who use it are not. He's wildly out of tune all over the original performance, he acknowledges it himself.
Like human beings at least.
I agree, if he actually put the effort into getting better takes and understanding what his actual issue is (he's just commonly flat, especially in the lower-register parts) and mitigating that with practice, he'd have something so much better than the pitch corrected version, something that DOESN'T sound like a straight to DVD disney soundtrack rip off.
Yeah, the corrected one sounds robotic
@@matturner6890 Yeah he's out of tune but it still sounds better. Sounds like a bunch of dudes sitting around singing together. Being slightly out of tune is similar to purposefully adding white noise to your track, it makes it sound warmer and more relaxed. It's not "being nice" it's having an opinion about which sounds better.
Only for the intro song you deserve at least double of likes and subs!!!!! great!!!!
I love that you are doing more general and not guitar centered tutorials. Very helpful.
I can't tell you how many times I get stuck or give up because my performance isn't up to my standard. It gives me so much anxiety. Your confidence to show your "pretty bad" performance to the audience and confidently walk through how to make it sound better is SO encouraging to me. Thank you!
Great video Jake. As a lead singer in my much younger days, back in the early 80s, your voice is what set you apart from everyone else. Today, wow! So many possibilities and options. You actually have a decent voice when you stay in your natural range. Unfortunately, your range is like halfway between most natural melody lines, but I'm sure you already know that. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this process because you encourage people to expand their potential and try new things. Your descriptions are hilarious and true, yes most people will notice, but unless they are expecting a professional performance they will usually be more optimistic. Lol
Hey, I've watched the "same type" of videos from many other big youtubers and you always do the best job. With this video, and others. You are super knowledgeable.
Will be very helpful. Thanks
I vote yes on the reverb, though maybe a little less. I'd also love to hear what happens with some delay.
All the "dislikes" are from Maluma, Bad Bunny, Paulina Rubio, Britney Spears, Daddy Yankee, Nicky Jam, J Balvin, Don Omar, Wisin & Yandel, Ozuna, Tito El Bambino, Pitbull, Nicki Minaj, etc.
I always come back to listen to that intro. I like it. You should make a full song of it!
"ANY decent shi- singer should..."
This is great. But when I googled Melodyne and it showed a whooping 699€ price to me... ooof!!! Maybe you could reach the same effect with FL Studios Newtone?
Gates....
After editing all of those lip smacks out with automation I feel relieved and stupefied at the same time 😅
Pitch correction can't help a singer with bad tone quality. Luckily, the person in the video has good time quality. The unedited version is literally 90-95% of the way there.
"sometimes good enough is good enough" unironically good words to live by. Our own perfectionism sometimes really gets in the way of learning, improving and - most importantly - getting shit done
The lyrics made me think you were gonna sound like a flock of geese when the Melodine turned off, but you sounded good.
Ok, how many people have ears good enough to notice that Jake's singing wasn't the most pristine? I couldn't, though I will admit I have a tin ear. Even when the effects were turned off I found it quite passable.
It's a bit more distinguishable when you wear earphones in a quiet room. But yeah, I think most untrained people who don't have perfect pitch will probably not find it that bad.
Back in the day singers had to sing live with reasonable consistency to even get a record deal...that's why a lot of the old stuff was good.
Then came stage one of correction technology which allowed poor singers to actually sound pretty good on recordings. However, not live, which is why many acts sounded pretty poor live, and often used the excuse that the singer was 'emotionally drained' or 'tired' from a long tour, or was drunk LOL
Then stage two of correction technology where they use all kinds of software and techniques to make a live singer sound good.
That said, there has always been suspicions with many acts about how 'live' the sound was, back in the day of singing to a tape machine. I can remember in the 80s some guy on his own in a pub singing live with a whole band and at times almost orchestration via a tape machine turning away at the back. At least he played his guitar live (well, some parts LOL).
I may sound a bit of a hippy, but I do think that music has lost a lot of its soul and meaning...
Him: If I'm writing on the page... I'm not good enough to keep all those harmonies on track in my head.
Mozart: hehe
Beethoven: Hehehehe
you sound pretty fine bruh, you might not feel comfortable as the front man, but you clearly have a lot of what's required, timing, proper annunciation, tonal control and support. clever video but you over played your terribleness :)
Melodyne is a tool. If a tool can help you achieve a brilliant finished project, I don't see how it matters. That is why tools exist
Exactly. Guitars dont sound distorted or loud when played naturally. And we have zero issues with guitarists using different tools to get a cool sounding tone. Stop pretending that there are different rules for vocalists. I do agree with doing your best to practice getting the vocals as close to pitch perfect as possible. However,- Nobody is perfect everytime. Its our jobs as producers to make everything in the final production sound great. So we will continue to use tools that are available to us to achieve that goal.
@@lionsdenstudio4934 Sounds a little like an excuse bringing in guitar into this.
You change the tone of the electric guitar, not the actual note being played. The note will always be the same. Tone, effects can't save you if you can't play in tune.
You're making it sound that guitarists just put on an effect that keeps them in tune. I know you probably didn't mean that but it sounds like that.
I think we should make fun of people who use pitch correction. Maybe one day they will teach themselves to sing better. Although Justin Bieber sang fo so long and he is still not doing good. Besides perfect isn't better. It doesn't sound unique.
2:37 I love it when a pinch of humour is added here and there where I don’t expect it...😂
Hey Jake, I'd love to see an analysis video on "I'm going slightly mad" from queen. This song is really interesting and has a beautiful weirdness going on. :)
Oh ok, yeah, my harmonies without pitch correction sound even worse lmao
Well, at least you have a great speaking voice!
My singing voice sounds bad in my tiny apartment.
It’s a little flat.
It was Cyberdyne at first but it became Melodyne after the "pitch" was corrected.. :-D
😆
Doesn't vocal production kind of defeat the purpose of singing?
One observation. You didn't need to record stereo files, mono would work exactly the same in your example. It saves resources and processing overhead. A stereo file from a mono Mic source is basically two copies of the same thing. As you go on to double and then pan hard left and right effectively only one half of the stereo file is used making the other half redundant.
Huh I agree 100% - I don't know why it defaulted to the stereo view when I recorded in Mono. I think my preferences changed when I updated ableton and I didn't realize it!
@@SignalsMusicStudio Well it still sounds good and it worked. Personally I find it visually easier to look at, especially in large projects.
oh wait i solved it lol! I actaully DID record in MONO like I suspect, but I rendered out the individual stems in stereo to place into a new setlist for mixing/filming/etc. I didn't mention it but I had to automate a time change at the end for the slowdown, and melodyne won't work with timechanges so I basically imported everything into a new set, and thats where the stereo tracks came from :P
@@SignalsMusicStudio lol, that would do it too ;)
Lyric writing on point, and your raw vocals are better than my tuned vocals...
I’ve just learned more about producing music in the last hour of watching your content than I have in the last 23 years of being alive, you are amazing
On top of all content you've put in here, I can't imagine how much more was in order to first plan all of it and wrap it all in this fantastically holistic video, with the final perspective(s) in mind. You're my bridge to what really can be done from home, and yet reach out to what comes out the professional studios. Maybe I joined too late, but ever since I did, I'm endlessly grateful, and will remain forever one (maybe not most invested, yet) of your patrons exactly for that humility you bring out with, all this so valuable content, in its rightful context. Much love and respect from a Bulgarian fan in London. Thank you, and keep remaining you 🙏🤘🤗💓
thank you 🙏🙏
@@SignalsMusicStudio only stating the obvious broski! We thank you right back, for remaining yourself 🙌🙏😊
Is it just me or doesn't 0:50 sound like a vocal only track of a Weezer song for a few seconds?
When would you call it a V/V or a II chord?
@TacoTacoTacoTaco I mean a V/V as opposed to a II chord. I'm talking about borrowed chords vs secondary dominants.
Honestly I consider that F# to be a II but I thought calling it V/V would placate the academic types out there. If it resolves to the primary chord, I'll parse it as a secondary dominant, but if it doesn't like in this case, I'll prolly just call it a borrowed chord.
Call it Jorge, gives more personality.