Why The New Patek Cubitus Is A Game Changer...

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 янв 2025

Комментарии • 47

  • @garyr4946
    @garyr4946 2 месяца назад +3

    I love the look of this watch, great if you have a larger wrist.

  • @gustavorivero5653
    @gustavorivero5653 20 дней назад +1

    I have the watch, is really beautiful and confortable, very good move from Patek

  • @pieterjacobs6617
    @pieterjacobs6617 2 месяца назад +11

    Of course your opinion will change when you try sell the watch at multiples of retail. Also. The size difference to the Pepsi is clear and obvious.

  • @a.g.8724
    @a.g.8724 2 месяца назад +7

    I'm afraid none of your three reasons are true:
    - First, it's waterproof up to 30 m, not 120 m
    - Second, 45 mm has nothing to do with 40 mm
    - Third, the trend has been actually quite the opposite (big watches over smaller watches)

  • @diemes5463
    @diemes5463 2 месяца назад +13

    It's visibly larger on your wrist, we have eyes, we can see

    • @garshkilla
      @garshkilla 2 месяца назад

      It’s not, you’re just broke and jealous

  • @redjacket5715
    @redjacket5715 Месяц назад +2

    i changed my mind about the new patek , at first i hated it thinking its a cheap ripoff of the Nautilus , but when i had it it my hand my opinion changed completely , its a cheap ripoff of cartier santos....

  • @demepenar3273
    @demepenar3273 2 месяца назад +13

    its like a wall clock in your hand

  • @s.s.6392
    @s.s.6392 2 месяца назад +3

    It's officially 30m water resistant, not 120. But indeed a fantastic timepiece!

  • @sjtg
    @sjtg Месяц назад

    I'm a buyer at MSRP. 200k is crazy talk.

  • @neosam4163
    @neosam4163 2 месяца назад +1

    Man, it’s f’ing ugly.. stop hyping up non-sense proportions.

  • @СудоплатовК.М
    @СудоплатовК.М 2 месяца назад

    120 meters - it was a long time ago. Now "Aquanaut", "Nautilus" and "Cubitus" have a water protection of 30 meters. It's just a splash guard.)

  • @weetjijwel050
    @weetjijwel050 2 месяца назад +1

    Was wondering about the price. Then i heard 'would you pay 200k for this watch?'. I dont think many people watching YT can spend 200k on a watch, mate 🤣. Besides the price: nice watch.

  • @ameeral-shammaa9012
    @ameeral-shammaa9012 5 дней назад

    I believe your admiration of the watch is strictly self serving. You’re just trying to sell the watch to the highest bidder. The good thing is these cubiti are selling in the grey market for less than a comparable nautilus. I think that says it all. Wait till the hype around this watch dies and more examples are available and see how the prices are gonna crash even further. Plus saying that Patek is starting a trend for square watches sounds like you’ve never seen a Cartier Santos!!

  • @billchan6180
    @billchan6180 2 месяца назад

    Lets put it this way, if there wasnt a nautilus or Cartier Santos, it might be a nice watch. Most watch fans like me just cant get that out of our minds

  • @choyayahyah
    @choyayahyah 2 месяца назад

    200k for a time only steel watch? Hell no! Even the retail is high for that watch!

  • @GambinoPatron
    @GambinoPatron 2 месяца назад

    its similar to the Santos

  • @magnumbrown
    @magnumbrown 2 месяца назад

    how much is patek paying you?

  • @will.davlin
    @will.davlin 2 месяца назад +2

    wool socks to bed=life altering dreams🟧😶🟫🟫

  • @keepclosingacademy
    @keepclosingacademy 2 месяца назад +15

    If you can’t see the difference between a 40mm and a 45mm watch you shouldn’t be making watch content

    • @russell996
      @russell996 2 месяца назад

      The width 9-3 is identical to the 5811 and 0.4mm larger than the 5711. Diagonal yes, + 4mm 5811

    • @garshkilla
      @garshkilla 2 месяца назад

      If you think millimeters is a direct reflection of how a watch wears, you shouldn’t even be making comments on watch content

    • @russell996
      @russell996 2 месяца назад

      @@garshkilla You have an interesting thought process regarding commenting with facts. Clearly you always need to wear a watch to understand what measurements actually mean on the wrist. Virtually any watch can be too big or too small depending on the wrist size and shape. If you have small wrists then a Cubitus is not for you. Always buy a watch that fits you.

    • @garshkilla
      @garshkilla 2 месяца назад

      @@russell996 Sorry, I was talking to the guy who originally posted the needlessly condescending comment

    • @russell996
      @russell996 2 месяца назад

      @@garshkilla 😂👍

  • @Conghoang1991
    @Conghoang1991 2 месяца назад

    I would happily pay $35k for it but no more LMAO

  • @mrpollopizza
    @mrpollopizza 2 месяца назад +1

    Not even watched the video,
    Just read the title....
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

  • @etviper
    @etviper 2 месяца назад +1

    Seen it in person, still didn't changed my mind, it is a terrible design.

  • @user-do8fb9gz4x
    @user-do8fb9gz4x 2 месяца назад

    It's a Cartier Santos with a nautilus bracelet. Not a game changer. Also, looks huge on your wrist. Not elegant or sleek.

  • @jordybakker
    @jordybakker 2 месяца назад

    1. the watch is definitely bigger than the pepsi😂
    2. the watch is a 100 % rip off from the Cartier
    3. the watch looks great but when i see the cubitus all I can think that it's a Cartier rip off
    Patek is nautilus and nautilus is patek. They did horrible with this one

  • @ThriftyCHNR
    @ThriftyCHNR 2 месяца назад

    None of those points were "game changing". this is a finely made watch, but lazy in design. borrowed dial and bracelet. round movement in square case.

  • @nicolayrulov5566
    @nicolayrulov5566 2 месяца назад

    ROLEX BEST OF THE BEST

  • @abdom9935
    @abdom9935 2 месяца назад

    Shock, horror...someone selling watches says it's a great watch! It's not. It's bloody horrible.

  • @robynsjp
    @robynsjp 2 месяца назад

    Overrated. Minute markers on the dial are not finished properly they are dripping over the horizontal stripes if you look closely. Same finish as a Swatch. Just another hype showoff watch, but poorly finished.

  • @saijinkai
    @saijinkai 2 месяца назад

    Lol😂 it certainly is a game changer, we are looking away from Patek and going to other brands that’s better. 😂😂

  • @suprotimsom
    @suprotimsom 2 месяца назад

    Nothing about this watch is revolutionary. Its a phoned in design by a frankly uninspired brand. Patek is a joke of a brand

  • @EarlyNai
    @EarlyNai 2 месяца назад

    stop trying to convince yourself

  • @ulfj3170
    @ulfj3170 2 месяца назад

    It is really not a new trend. Or design 😂.

  • @65hi863dhyu
    @65hi863dhyu 2 месяца назад

    Cheap, gaudy, Asian market driven design...

  • @metamofia
    @metamofia 2 месяца назад

    Someone drank the koolaid.

  • @enjOi47
    @enjOi47 2 месяца назад

    its too big