Jaguar F-Pace SUV 2017 Review | Driver's Seat

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 янв 2025

Комментарии • 22

  • @mrek2068
    @mrek2068 4 года назад +1

    A very good review, although the quality of external camera shots look a little fuzzy. However, Word Car of the Year 2017, and World Car Design of the Year as well, says it all! 82 global motoring journalists from 24 countries can't be wrong. Buying on next year - the V6S. Thank you for your detailed review. Extremely helpful.

  • @andrewjones-le2mf
    @andrewjones-le2mf 6 лет назад +7

    At 40 sec you mention it’s available front or all wheel drive, a small but crucial correction as it’s actually rear or all wheel drive.

  • @CryptoBullrunChannel
    @CryptoBullrunChannel 7 лет назад +10

    beautiful SUV sport car!

    • @driversseat659
      @driversseat659  7 лет назад +2

      The F-Pace is a stunning looking SUV. Particularly like it in red.

  • @arekkramp4060
    @arekkramp4060 8 лет назад +6

    Nice car

  • @RogerBaileyOnCars
    @RogerBaileyOnCars 7 лет назад +4

    Really good review, SUV convert comment is v true, I did a review of the F Pace too - not as good as this one I might add, could be worth a look though !

    • @driversseat659
      @driversseat659  7 лет назад +1

      Roger Bailey thanks for your kind comments.

  • @cywoods60
    @cywoods60 7 лет назад

    Great review

  • @ptvfr800
    @ptvfr800 8 лет назад +5

    Not having a camera is a poor show from Jaguar, most other vehicles on the road have them, even economy cars.

    • @feroz5927
      @feroz5927 8 лет назад +1

      The rear camera is an option.

  • @Hellcat1960
    @Hellcat1960 7 лет назад

    Strange the 3 liter turbo diesel isn't available in North America It seems like the best of the bunch. Oh well awesome car!.

  • @johnmcalinden3615
    @johnmcalinden3615 7 лет назад +1

    Really nice review but the film resolution isn't good enough for modern screens. You need 4k or 1080p at least. otherwise great.

    • @driversseat659
      @driversseat659  7 лет назад +1

      Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. We'll look into it.

  • @scotia4429
    @scotia4429 8 лет назад +1

    Too many cheap crappy bits of plastic for a £40k + car .. now that the new road tax is coming in is this car worth £450 tax a year ?

    • @alanwayte432
      @alanwayte432 8 лет назад +7

      Scott Irons yes it is I have just replaced my X5 with the F Pace and I am delighted, try driving or owning won before making stupid comments, the build quality is easily on a par with X5...great value

    • @keithlane
      @keithlane 7 лет назад +1

      That road tax change is based on list price not on the road price ...

    • @joefattal7592
      @joefattal7592 6 лет назад +2

      Typical unfounded comment

    • @raydonferrari1
      @raydonferrari1 2 года назад

      @Alan Wayte hi Alan im looking at buying an approved used with 34000 miles on clock 66 plate. How would you rate the car any problems etc any advice would be greatful Thankyou

    • @vaisakhamolkunnumel2982
      @vaisakhamolkunnumel2982 2 года назад +1

      @@raydonferrari1 Just got a 34k mile 17 Rev 2ltr RSport Grey with black alloys… 2 things - I can’t stop staring at this this and I don’t ever want to stop driving this thing. It handles like a dream, a bulky large SUV on the outside and hatchback whilst driving on those narrow mountain roads! Took it to a weekend get away to the peaks from Bournemouth - covers all terrains that. Interior quality is not as bad as some make it sound - it feels premium in there. Ride is a bit bumpy though.. that unreal handling is not all that free I suppose..

  • @BAMovin
    @BAMovin 7 лет назад +2

    Sign of the times unfortunately.

  • @aymant-n4840
    @aymant-n4840 3 года назад

    Very expensive