@@SergeyShakhdinarov I would have to see an example of this process. Maybe put up a video of it. I tried the process yesterday after you mentioned it. I found it's not ideal for a number of reasons. Structures such as galaxies in the surrounding region will be left out. The empty space becomes imbalanced so tools don't know what to make of it, thus STF-based histogram stretches will fail and manual histogram stretches become touchy. But, above all, you will lose the special light quality between the stars found in globular clusters.
i love your videos man. I have a question. you said you use the uranus C or deep space. is it worth paying extra for the cooled version or is the non cooled version good enough ?
The Uranus-C, even though technically a planetary camera, is excellent for DSOs. In my experience, it handles heat noise very well, but I live in Canada where it never gets very hot. A hot night here would be perhaps 20C. However, on Lukomatico's channel, he has used it on much hotter nights with very good results. But while it's a great camera, were I to do it again, I would get the Ares-C, also by Player One. The larger field of view of the IMX533 sensor is very impressive. However, either would make a good choice. I think the cooler on the Uranus Pro version will help but it is unlikely to make an extreme difference unless you are dealing with very hot nights.
I've posted twice and both comments were erased. Can you not post links? I posted links. Anyhow, I don't see any lightworms if I use Starnett on the linear image in Siril. I had links to show, but apparently my comments get erased when I do that.
Sorry, I have no control over that. YT doesn't allow viewers to post links. If you conceal the links, like put a ' between words, you can sneak them through.
If you extract stars before stretching, no additional processing to keep the core of the cluster is necessary.
Do you mean the extracted star image then becomes the main Image?
@@oakleywindowcleaning yes, though I normally keep parts of the background
@@SergeyShakhdinarov I would have to see an example of this process. Maybe put up a video of it. I tried the process yesterday after you mentioned it. I found it's not ideal for a number of reasons. Structures such as galaxies in the surrounding region will be left out. The empty space becomes imbalanced so tools don't know what to make of it, thus STF-based histogram stretches will fail and manual histogram stretches become touchy. But, above all, you will lose the special light quality between the stars found in globular clusters.
Great shot i absolutely love Globular cluster!
They are fascinating. A star made out of stars.
@@SKYST0RY they are the best, I love Photographing and Observing them! They remind me of Dwarf Galaxies!
i love your videos man. I have a question. you said you use the uranus C or deep space. is it worth paying extra for the cooled version or is the non cooled version good enough ?
The Uranus-C, even though technically a planetary camera, is excellent for DSOs. In my experience, it handles heat noise very well, but I live in Canada where it never gets very hot. A hot night here would be perhaps 20C. However, on Lukomatico's channel, he has used it on much hotter nights with very good results. But while it's a great camera, were I to do it again, I would get the Ares-C, also by Player One. The larger field of view of the IMX533 sensor is very impressive. However, either would make a good choice. I think the cooler on the Uranus Pro version will help but it is unlikely to make an extreme difference unless you are dealing with very hot nights.
Interesting.
I've posted twice and both comments were erased.
Can you not post links? I posted links.
Anyhow, I don't see any lightworms if I use Starnett on the linear image in Siril. I had links to show, but apparently my comments get erased when I do that.
Sorry, I have no control over that. YT doesn't allow viewers to post links. If you conceal the links, like put a ' between words, you can sneak them through.
@@SKYST0RY That's what I though. Thanks.
'ruclips.net/video/Npy39uHfcnA/видео.html"
There's a video demonstrating.