SKY STORY
SKY STORY
  • Видео 172
  • Просмотров 647 417
Reinforce Color & Sharpness of Specific Structures Without Affecting the Rest of the Image (Expert)
What if you need to improve ONLY the color and sharpness of a SPECIFIC structure within an image, such as just the blue-white filaments in the thumbnail? The best solution is more integration time, but if you can't get it, you can find the color channel where that information is strongest, create a single-color master from it, and add it back to the image. But to avoid artifacts, it must be done with finesse. (Please be aware this is an expert level technique and presumes you are already familiar with developing astrophotography.)
See the finished image of the Flaming Star Nebula at the Sky Story Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/3jchdv/
*** *** ***
Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from ...
Просмотров: 1 762

Видео

Three Tests That Break the Flat Earth Cult
Просмотров 22 тыс.21 час назад
There are three things any flat earther could do that show beyond a shadow of a doubt the world is a sphere and space is real. But the vast majority won't because facts would break the cult. Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observatory at Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/users/SkyStory/ If you would like to learn about my multi-tiered, layer-based approach to astrophotog...
Green Swamp Server: A Better Way to Control Your Mount
Просмотров 2 тыс.День назад
Switching to the Green Swamp Server to control my mount was the best thing to happen to my astrophotography since the CMOS sensor. Let's take a look at how to set it up and use it. Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observatory at Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/users/SkyStory/ If you would like to learn about my multi-tiered, layer-based approach to astrophotography deve...
Flat Earthers & Space Is Fakers: Cults Who Don't Know They Are Cults
Просмотров 21 тыс.14 дней назад
Flat earthers have a sibling you may not have heard of, the space-is-fake bunch, which has been getting nasty and pushy. Both these groups are not just fueled by misunderstanding. They are cults. Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observatory at Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/users/SkyStory/ If you would like to learn about my multi-tiered, layer-based approach to astrop...
How to Reveal the Blazing Cores of Globular Clusters
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.21 день назад
Globular clusters are like mini-galaxies with tens of thousands of closely packed stars. They are often portrayed with blazing cores like suns, the inner regions far too bright for the individual stars to be seen. But that central brightness can be lifted, and the stars at the core revealed. Let's see how. All the images used to make this video were shot at the Sky Story Observatory. Check out ...
NINA's Autofocus Donuts: If It Won't Focus, Make a Hole
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.21 день назад
If that DSO won't focus, and you use NINA, you can make a hole in the field of view and autofocus around it! The ability of NINA to create focus donuts is one of its most powerful autofocus tricks. You can see the full res star cluster, NGC 7078, used in this video at the Sky Story Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/16s7hr/ If you would like to learn about my multi-tiered, layer-based approach to astro...
Satellite Pollution: How to Cope With a Growing Problem
Просмотров 98928 дней назад
There are more than 13,000 manmade satellites orbiting Earth, and the number keeps going up. How do astrophotographers adapt to the growing problem of satellite pollution? You can see the full resolution version of the Great Pegasus Globular Star Cluster used in this video at the Sky Story Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/16s7hr/ Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observat...
Step-by-Step Region-Specific Sharpening With PhotoLab 8
Просмотров 573Месяц назад
Some regions of an image are more information-rich and can benefit from more sharpening. Some regions have different balances of information and need other sharpening approaches. Photolab 8's powerful selection options and variety of enhancement tools allow sharpening each area of an image in whatever way that works best. Let's take a step-by-step look at how it's done. BlurXterminator applicat...
Cohesive Sharpening: Bringing Together Different Apps for Sharper Images
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.Месяц назад
AI-based sharpeners, unsharp maskers, micro/fine contrast adjustment, the ClearView Plus tool . . . What do they all have in common? They are tools from various apps that use differing strategies to refine detail in an image. But their differences can be made to work together, each building its sharpening approach upon the other, allowing for new levels of detail to be pulled out of an image. S...
A Deeper Dive Into Lifting Detail Out of Darkness
Просмотров 2 тыс.Месяц назад
Every time an astrophotographer stretches a histogram to make a DSO visible, they have "lifted" the information. More integration and focused lifting can bring detail out of even the darkest objects because digital camera sensors capture information we cannot see. Let's take a deeper dive into the theory behind this, and use it to reveal the hidden structure of the most famous dark nebula: the ...
Where Is the Center of the Cosmos
Просмотров 576Месяц назад
It's not hard to find the center of the cosmos. It turns out it's everywhere. Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observatory at Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/users/SkyStory/ We are Telescope Canada's first affiliate. It's a great place for astrophotography gear with fast service and an informed staff who are passionate about astrophotography. Using the following link ad...
Discover What's Really In Your Astro Photos With "What's In My Image"
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.Месяц назад
The free "What's In My Image" app can reveal astrophysical masers, hidden galaxies, black hole candidates, Wolf-Rayet stars and a whole cosmos of other things from the ordinary to the far end of exotic going on within your astro images. You can download the Seti Astro Editing Suite here: www.setiastro.com/seti-astros-editng-suite View the original, full resolution image used to make this video ...
Comparing Cosmic Clarity to NoiseXterminator and BlurXterminator
Просмотров 2,4 тыс.Месяц назад
Cosmic Clarity is a free tool that provides AI-powered deconvolution, sharpening and denoising. NoiseXterminator and BlurXterminator are paid AI-powered applications that perform the same jobs. We'll use a challenging information-rich, high dynamic range image to test the performance of each. NGC 1333 on Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/8jaxh8/ Image Processing Playlist: ruclips.net/p/PL5QNoAcKJBRP7G...
Checking Out Cosmic Clarity -- A Free & Excellent Deblur & Denoise Tool
Просмотров 3 тыс.Месяц назад
Let's check out Seti Astro's Cosmic Clarity tool, a free deblurring and denoising tool that can be used with PixInsight or stand-alone. Check out a portfolio of astro imagery shot from the Sky Story Observatory at Astrobin: www.astrobin.com/users/SkyStory/ We are Telescope Canada's first affiliate. It's a great place for astrophotography gear with fast service and an informed staff who are pass...
How to Reveal Structure Hidden In Darkness
Просмотров 3,4 тыс.Месяц назад
Many DSOs conceal structure in their darkest regions, but digital cameras are very good at capturing it even if you cannot see it. Let's take an image without much integration time yet and see how much detail can be pulled into the light. Let's explore how to bring that hidden detail into the light. Horsehead Nebula Practice Image: drive.google.com/file/d/1mLG-X4F9z0m01p6ywRAn6vY9tAwAgI8F/view?...
How Astronomers & Astrophotographers Make Those Gorgeous Full Color Images of the Cosmos
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.2 месяца назад
How Astronomers & Astrophotographers Make Those Gorgeous Full Color Images of the Cosmos
How the SCT Creates Focal Length Out of Thin Air
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.2 месяца назад
How the SCT Creates Focal Length Out of Thin Air
Easily Transform Color Images to HOO & SHO With PixInsight's Narrowband Normalization Tool
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.2 месяца назад
Easily Transform Color Images to HOO & SHO With PixInsight's Narrowband Normalization Tool
How to Tell If Your Image Needs More Integration Time
Просмотров 6 тыс.2 месяца назад
How to Tell If Your Image Needs More Integration Time
Transform LRGB, RGB & OSC Images Into the HOO Color Palette
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.2 месяца назад
Transform LRGB, RGB & OSC Images Into the HOO Color Palette
What Makes Trolls & Gatekeepers Tick, And Why They Don't Matter
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.2 месяца назад
What Makes Trolls & Gatekeepers Tick, And Why They Don't Matter
Faster Subframe Selection With the Sigma Formula
Просмотров 2,1 тыс.2 месяца назад
Faster Subframe Selection With the Sigma Formula
Maintain Astro Image Quality With Better Exporting
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.2 месяца назад
Maintain Astro Image Quality With Better Exporting
Improve Your Astrophotography with PhotoLab 8: Complete Workflow
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.2 месяца назад
Improve Your Astrophotography with PhotoLab 8: Complete Workflow
Blown Away By Astrophotography Results With DxO PhotoLab 8
Просмотров 2,5 тыс.3 месяца назад
Blown Away By Astrophotography Results With DxO PhotoLab 8
Aurora Over Maritime Canada
Просмотров 3463 месяца назад
Aurora Over Maritime Canada
Why I Never Edit My Astro Photos In PixInsight (but do use it for other things!)
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.3 месяца назад
Why I Never Edit My Astro Photos In PixInsight (but do use it for other things!)
Advanced Evolved Stretching: Handling Regions of Very Different Brightness Within an Image
Просмотров 3,7 тыс.3 месяца назад
Advanced Evolved Stretching: Handling Regions of Very Different Brightness Within an Image
More On Strategic Frequency Acquisition: Improve Outcomes With Gamma Constriction
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.3 месяца назад
More On Strategic Frequency Acquisition: Improve Outcomes With Gamma Constriction
More Fast Focal Ratio Mythconceptions
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.3 месяца назад
More Fast Focal Ratio Mythconceptions

Комментарии

  • @christineanderson-x5u
    @christineanderson-x5u 6 часов назад

    Spinning ball earth is a cult. 2 can play at that one. Where is your argument and your evidence for a ball earth?

  • @gilles987654321
    @gilles987654321 7 часов назад

    At 1:53 the lower right image is the blue filter and a few seconds later it becomes a green filter. What’s the magic?

    • @SKYST0RY
      @SKYST0RY 6 часов назад

      Oh! I am glad you caught that. It seems I added the abbreviations backward after I removed the L master. Go by the master tab and not the bigger name beside it. I'll see if I can edit that out of the video.

  • @amg_proof
    @amg_proof 8 часов назад

    Hi Sky Story! I'm a producer with A+E Networks and we'd like to get in touch with you about this footage. Can you confirm your preferred email so we can connect? Thank you!

  • @KZgun4hire
    @KZgun4hire 16 часов назад

    I am occasionally having similar issues with EQMOD (kstars/ekos/indi) where the mount forgets where objects are in the sky and often slews to the wrong side of the meridian. I have found this occurs when syncing the software's location of the scope when the location is very close to the pole (ie during polar alignment). I have been avoiding this by not syncing until after a polar alignment. After completing the polar alignment I will sync with my first target (plate solve). Unfortunately for me GSS isn't an option with INDI. (As far as I know).

  • @tom-
    @tom- 20 часов назад

    i love looking at this on a clear night

  • @JulesStoop
    @JulesStoop День назад

    What causes these? Are they basically atmospheric caustics?

  • @Poepopdestoep
    @Poepopdestoep День назад

    Last year we had 261 launches to space (the human race) That's 5 launches per week! How can anyone still believe the earth is flat or space is fake. I'm incredibly envious of Americans who can, if they want, go and watch several launches with some planning in a short amount of time.

  • @George89999
    @George89999 День назад

    Another inexpensive way to demonstrate that the Earth isn't flat (in addition to using drones, tall buildings, etc.). Is to use a clear plastic/vinyl hose and some wood to build a simple water level. According to flat-earthers (because they still copy Rowbotham's nonsense) they think that the horizon "rises to eye level" as your altitude increases, this has long been an article of faith within their dogma. All you need to do is use the water level to record the position of the horizon at a lower altitude (preferably at sea level but it's not necessary). Then take the water level to a significantly higher altitude (such as up a mountain) and notice that the horizon is now lower than at the lower altitude. This alone debunks one of their central claims. The reason I suggest using a water level is because flat-earthers frequently mistake looking down at something as it being "at eye level" and so a simple water level provides a low-tech way to objectively show that they're mistaken.

    • @stuartgray5877
      @stuartgray5877 День назад

      You can do this with an iPhone on a commercial airliner and measure the "drop from eye level".

    • @George89999
      @George89999 День назад

      @@stuartgray5877 Thank you for the suggestion, I had considered suggesting an app like that (they are available on both major platforms) but decided against bringing it up because flat-earthers seem to have trouble using them correctly. I've even seen one flerf who calibrated the app in mid-flight while looking down at the horizon and declared that the app proved the horizon was at "eye-level"! 🤦 So I thought it best to go with something very cheap but harder to mess up.

  • @AstroIsland
    @AstroIsland День назад

    Definitely I would love to see more videos on how to use Affinity Photo Lab. I’m always willing to try new software and compare results. Tutorials are usually my startup guide and then I take off on my own.

  • @janelubenskyi1177
    @janelubenskyi1177 2 дня назад

    Question Please:😊 In another video Tonal Mapping was used to bring out detail…if I wanted to use this method as well to bring out detail then where in the steps of your video would Tonal Mapping fit in…can I add it within the synergistic steps of Frequency Separation…please explain?

    • @SKYST0RY
      @SKYST0RY 6 часов назад

      I got to your question last because it's a good question without a simple, single good answer. In general, I would suggest doing your frequency separation early and sharpening the individual images. Bring them together to create the final tone mapped image later in the development process. As a rule, I do my sharpening as early as possible in development, then again at the end of development.

  • @vidholf
    @vidholf 2 дня назад

    Thank you! Is there a way this approach could be adapted to OSC images? (I happen to be working on the same target. I have somewhere over 20 hours of integration so far, and have been wondering how to bring out the blue-white nebulosity.)

    • @SKYST0RY
      @SKYST0RY День назад

      At 20 hours you should be good. Are you shooting in a high Bortle area? You separate out the color channels from an OSC using PixInsight's Split RGB Channels tool. You can also split them in Affinity Photo if you don't have PI, but it's more complicated. Enough I would have to make a video on it. Once you've split the channels, just add back your relevant information. However, you will find the master from an OSC to be somewhat weaker.

    • @vidholf
      @vidholf День назад

      @@SKYST0RY Thank you! I'm in a Bottle 4-5 area. I don't have Pixinsight, but do have Affinity Photo. If you think the OSC splitting video would be useful for others, I'd appreciate it. In the meantime, I'll see if I can figure it out in Siril, which at least shows the separate colors on different tabs.

  • @tomdaigon8707
    @tomdaigon8707 2 дня назад

    Bravo! I am amazed at the results you get from employing your technique of addressing high and low frequency information . Would you consider doing a version for users of one shot color cameras? Since PI has a function called DBxtract, creating mono images of HA, 03 and S2 is doable. And since I also love using photolab eight, could you incorporate the procedure for sharpening of the high frequency information in that tutorial as well? Thanks.

    • @SKYST0RY
      @SKYST0RY День назад

      It's been a while since I've done a video on shooting with an OSC because that telescope is presently mothballed till I can get the next observatory built. I meant to do that last summer but had to postpone due to a leg injury but should be able to get back to it this summer. PhotoLab 8 would not be a good place to work out high and low frequency information separately because it doesn't have a compositing feature. You need a layer-based image developer for that. Believe me, I wish I could work those out there because PL8 is so powerful, but for astrophotography it's uses are also highly specific. I use it as a finisher, once all the key development is done.

  • @Astro75mm
    @Astro75mm 2 дня назад

    keep them coming, these videos about image developing techniques are your best work here on youtube. I dont know if I speak for most people here, but, I for one highly appreciate these videos.

  • @DesertSky928
    @DesertSky928 2 дня назад

    I've studied this subject & made hundreds of observations for over 3 years now. I have yet to see evidence of any curvature whatsoever.....I've only witnessed evidence of zero curve just like it's stipulated in NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary", "Introduction" and "Concluding Remarks" sections of that publication on the "Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model". "Scientism" is the cult. Scientists lie. Engineers MUST deal with things "As They Are", not based on theories. "Science" is a religious cult. Engineering is based ONLY upon principles. They are not the same.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 2 дня назад

      _"I've studied this subject & made hundreds of observations for over 3 years now."_ Like watching a sunset? _"I have yet to see evidence of any curvature whatsoever."_ Watch a sunset. _" just like it's stipulated in NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary""_ You don't know how to read that publication. That's where your issue is. Engineers are basing their work on theories, because that's what describes how stuff actually are.

    • @betaorionis2164
      @betaorionis2164 2 дня назад

      Engineers base their calculations on models and theories, previously developed by scientists. Could you please explain how do you think an engineer can calculate, for example, the stresses in a structure "upon principles", without taking into account science? Don't you see that your "principles" are, precisely, the science?

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler День назад

      "I've studied this subject & made hundreds of observations for over 3 years now. I have yet to see evidence of any curvature whatsoever" Huh, all you had to do was go to the beach and look at the horizon. Or notice that you can see further the higher you go. Or look at how the nautical mile was derived. Or ask any professional surveyors. What study and observations did you do exactly? "I've only witnessed evidence of zero curve just like it's stipulated in NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary", "Introduction" and "Concluding Remarks" sections of that publication on the "Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model". So you never understood that it's a document describing a simplified model, not the real world? I think you've wasted at least 3 years of your life, what a shame. ""Science" is a religious cult." You say, while posting a message on the internet only made possible by science. I guess you're a member of this "cult" too then.

  • @DesertSky928
    @DesertSky928 2 дня назад

    Zero evidence of Earth curvature can be observed on Earth, of Earth. Zero. Although, there are countless evidences of Flat Earth with cameras, lasers, even naked eye observations that I make myself several times a week whilst driving on I-15 between Riverside, California, and Salt Lake City, Utah. Read NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary", "Introduction" and "Concluding Remarks" sections. We all know now.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 2 дня назад

      _"Zero evidence of Earth curvature can be observed on Earth, of Earth"_ Watch a sunset. _"Read NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary", "Introduction" and "Concluding Remarks" sections."_ Lear,n to read before.

    • @betaorionis2164
      @betaorionis2164 2 дня назад

      We have evidence of the curvature of the Earth every time we see a distant object disappearing Botton first.

  • @gavdownes100
    @gavdownes100 2 дня назад

    The problem with going down the conspiracy rabbit hole is, it often ends with a very fat snake

  • @Wheeljack678
    @Wheeljack678 2 дня назад

    Chiming in with another vote of confidence for Player One. I am in danger of sounding like a chill here, but I am genuinely enthusiastic about this company and their products. I decided to try Player One for my new APS-C sized cooled, dedicated camera, and chose the Poseidon C-Pro about a year and a half ago (2023). I was thoroughly impressed with its look, feel and performance. It has worked under north European conditions (59 degrees N) for an entire season in everything from +20c to -25c. No problems at all, superb images. Unfortunately, I had an issue with my camera after 2-3 months (lost the green channel). I raised it with support who immediately arranged for the camera to be shipped to them, repaired and returned to me at no cost of my own. If we subtract days in transit and holidays, they had my camera for a grand total of 2 working days before it was returned. I've reached out to support a couple of times with other questions I've had, and I have received nothing but excellent service. I really hope they continue with that, because I do want to see this company succeed.

  • @e.h.5849
    @e.h.5849 2 дня назад

    Bob, is this you?

  • @soyounoat
    @soyounoat 2 дня назад

    Ask a flat earther if they use the GPS function on their mobile device for navigation.

    • @stuartgray5877
      @stuartgray5877 День назад

      Truth IS: MOST (not all) mobile devices us the cell towers for triangulation. The drive to make cellphones TINY has (mostly) eliminated GPS from cellphones because of the size of the antenna required. Garmin's and other dedicated GPS receivers DO use "real GPS" and work EVERYWHERE ON THE PLANET, and we even use them for orbital position in modern satellites.

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 Час назад

      @@stuartgray5877 Truth is, you are completely wrong. MOST mobile devices use real GPS, and work anywhere whether you have cell service or not. "Triangulation" based on towers was used very early on, but the accuracy is pretty awful, bordering on useless. Stop repeating that nonsense.

    • @stuartgray5877
      @stuartgray5877 52 минуты назад

      @ what would I know? I am just an EE who builds spacecraft that use GPS. I have a GPS constellation simulator at work and can spoof any device that uses GPS. Search for article: “Do Cell Phones Have GPS Receivers (Fact Checked!)” Then remove foot from mouth

    • @stuartgray5877
      @stuartgray5877 48 минут назад

      @ so it has shifted from MOST phones do not contain gps receivers to now SOME cellphones still do not use GPS. The latest versions use software defined radio for all of it So my statement was far from “nonsense”

  • @fredohonius
    @fredohonius 2 дня назад

    It’s always green screens. No matter what

  • @williamramey1959
    @williamramey1959 2 дня назад

    Did you also see Will Duffy's video of the 24 hour Moon?

  • @williamramey1959
    @williamramey1959 2 дня назад

    A flat-earther recently said to me that a person can go to Antarctica but the individual cannot freely explore it. I agreed because it costs tens of thousands of dollars, but a person of means can do it. I gave them an example that they could understand. We can freely travel in the USA, but unless it is by foot or hitchhiking and money for food, a person will need to invest in a rental vehicle or purchase one for themselves . Also, they will need to pay the fuel expenses and food. Because a person may not be able to do this, does it make it any less true that those who can are not able to travel "freely" in the USA.

  • @deniseschaller7744
    @deniseschaller7744 3 дня назад

    It's a cultl.That's the dumbest thing I ever heard of. And looking through a telescope proves the earth is round. That doesn't make no sense. I swear this is the dumbest video I saw

    • @DesertSky928
      @DesertSky928 2 дня назад

      I've studied this subject & made hundreds of observations for over 3 years now. I have yet to see evidence of any curvature whatsoever.....I've only witnessed evidence of zero curve just like it's stipulated in NASA Publication 1207, August 1988, in the "Summary", "Introduction" and "Concluding Remarks" sections of that publication on the "Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model". "Scientism" is the cult. Scientists lie. Engineers MUST deal with things "As They Are", not based on theories. "Science" is a religious cult. Engineering is based ONLY upon principles. They are not the same.

  • @SusanLondesbrough-ut1nx
    @SusanLondesbrough-ut1nx 3 дня назад

    COVID cult

  • @Itshowtime7223
    @Itshowtime7223 3 дня назад

    Now ball lover's are going be on this going to antarctic 💩. Just as they all up on the ball's 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @roberttombs3108
    @roberttombs3108 3 дня назад

    Deception by those serving the wrong master.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 2 дня назад

      Which "master" is right?

    • @roberttombs3108
      @roberttombs3108 2 дня назад

      @ThomasKundera There is God and the devil. One sets Order and the standards, and the other seeks the opposite meaning chaos and death.

  • @Ruby-ev7wm
    @Ruby-ev7wm 3 дня назад

    Just quickly, how do you get the bright areas between the star points in those photos? I always thought the cloud effect was done by making invisible wavelengths of electromagnetism visible. But, it really is all in the visible spectrum?

  • @anthonygondola3086
    @anthonygondola3086 4 дня назад

    I will have to try that. So far I've had the best results with GraxPert so I'll be interested in how your method compares.

  • @kaptainkrampus2856
    @kaptainkrampus2856 4 дня назад

    Dear, Videomaker ... since you ignored my first posting for a week now ... I takes a special kind of stupid to scoff at 'It's all CGI'-people, while indeed showing CGI! Why dont you use the footage of the first space walk ever (note the rotation speed!) - this looks even more ridiculous than that CGI stuff at 0:25

    • @GuardianSoulkeeper
      @GuardianSoulkeeper 3 дня назад

      What CGI?

    • @kaptainkrampus2856
      @kaptainkrampus2856 3 дня назад

      @@GuardianSoulkeeper I even posted the timestamp, but you are still asking ... fascinating!

    • @GuardianSoulkeeper
      @GuardianSoulkeeper 3 дня назад

      @@kaptainkrampus2856 This was presented as a real clip of Earth?

    • @kaptainkrampus2856
      @kaptainkrampus2856 2 дня назад

      @@GuardianSoulkeeper A minute ago you asked 'What CGI?', so obviously you took it as a real clip of Earth. Now you seem to have changed your mind? But to answer your question I can refer to my initial posting: "It takes a special kind of stupid to scoff at 'It's all CGI'-people, while indeed showing CGI!" ... why on Earth would one do that? I asked the videomaker over a week ago on that matter, but did not get an answer. So, we have to assume: That's obviously the best 'Earth from Space' footage' our videomaker has in store ... which is obviously CGI. But! I indeed have video footage from up there. You can find it totally easy by searching for 'First spacewalk 1965'. (please note Earth's rotation speed ... pretty fast back then!) That said: What video footage do you have from up there?

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 2 дня назад

      Where did anyone claim that the first 3 1/2 minutes of this video was real footage? "Why dont you use the footage of the first space walk ever (note the rotation speed!) - this looks even more ridiculous" a) What's wrong with the rotation speed? It looks pretty much the same as every other spacewalk/footage from the ISS? b) How does it look "ridiculous"? Do you have any evidence at all, or is it entirely based on personal incredulity?

  • @brentpolk8331
    @brentpolk8331 5 дней назад

    These are child minded people that defend their limited understanding of reality, due to their inability to comprehend the magnitude and scale of our actual existence, scale of the universe and possible fact that nothing beyond the physical exist.

  • @kaptainkrampus2856
    @kaptainkrampus2856 5 дней назад

    It takes a special kind of stupid to rely one's worldview on one Apollo image from 1972, while completely ignoring the first space walk footage, the Tesla in Space footage, the ISS hairspray footage, the ISS astronaut fade in / fade out footage, the ISS harness footage, the RB Stratos footage (in-cabin-camera) ... ... while also completely ignoring the fact, that you cannot visually observe the curvature or even a slightly dropping horizon from even a 100.000ft altitude ...

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 5 дней назад

      "It takes a special kind of stupid to rely one's worldview on one Apollo image from 1972" Agreed. Fortunately we have over 2000 years of accumulated scientific knowledge to show us without doubt that the earth is a rotating sphere. "the first space walk footage, the Tesla in Space footage, the ISS hairspray footage, the ISS astronaut fade in / fade out footage, the ISS harness footage, the RB Stratos footage" So personal incredulity and claims that things have been faked with zero supporting evidence? "while also completely ignoring the fact, that you cannot visually observe the curvature" You've never seen the horizon? "or even a slightly dropping horizon from even a 100.000ft altitude" Blatant lie. Anyone can verify this for themselves with a theodolite app or a basic water level from the top of a tall building or a hill. Have you ever taken a flight at sunset or sunrise? See how the sun is well below eye level, yet still above the horizon? Hmm.

    • @tims5268
      @tims5268 5 дней назад

      It takes a special kind of stupid to form your world view based on deceitful flat earth videos on RUclips. You can prove earth's curvature with two sticks and a basic knowledge of geometry FFS

    • @kaptainkrampus2856
      @kaptainkrampus2856 5 дней назад

      @@tims5268 " prove earth's curvature with two sticks" ... and that is just plain wrong and you dont even know why. The second point where you are just plain wrong is your assumption in your first sentence. Actually my world view is based on OBSERVABLE and REPEATABLE visual experiments. One example where the globe fails is very obvious in the RB Stratos jump from 39km and I am referring to the in-cabin-camera the moment the hatch was opened. You one the other hand cannot prove the curvature without the help of a dubious govt agency.

    • @kaptainkrampus2856
      @kaptainkrampus2856 5 дней назад

      @@tims5268 That said: Explain how you prove Earth's curvature with 2 sticks and basic geometry, including the actual formula, please.

    • @kaptainkrampus2856
      @kaptainkrampus2856 5 дней назад

      I already mentioned 5 examples why NASA is dubious, but forgot my fav one: Google 'Rijksmuseum Amsterdam moon rock' and explain to me how wood got to the moon ...

  • @klichmichael1442
    @klichmichael1442 5 дней назад

    Nice Video, thank you

  • @phillipking6153
    @phillipking6153 5 дней назад

    Logic and science…A few questions for globe believers: Please explain in great detail what gravity is and how it works. YOU CAN’T Do scientists claim to know what gravity is? NO What year did gravity change from the Theory of Gravity to the Law of Gravity? IT NEVER HAS..IT’S STILL A THEORY. Do you agree that 9.8 m/s^2 is the acceleration of gravity and is not the definition of gravity? Does the surface of water seek its level? YES Still water, above the scale of meniscus/adhesion/cohesion, always has a flat/level surface. Level being defined as being parallel to a straight infinite line. In my bottle of water, is the surface of my water level/flat? YES The mud puddle in my driveway, is the water surface level/flat? YES If I fill my bathtub full of water, is the surface of the water level/flat? YES What about my swimming pool in my yard, is the surface of the water level? YES My neighbor’s pond up the road, is the surface of that water level? YES How about the watershed lake in town, is that water surface level? YES Lake Michigan? Is the surface of that water level? YES If I dig a 1 acre pond, 2 acre, 3, 4, 10, 50, 100, 500, 10,000, 200,000, 1million acre lake and fill them each full of water…….which of the these bodies of water will not have a flat/level water surface? THEY WILL ALL HAVE A FLAT AND LEVEL SURFACE. At what point does the surface of water not remain flat/level? ANSWER: The surface of water is ALWAYS flat and level above the scale of meniscus/adhesion/cohesion. If the earth is actually an oblate ellipsoid/spheroid (fatter at the equator) due to the rotation, how is it possible for rivers in the northern hemisphere to flow north away from the equator and rivers in the southern hemisphere to flow south away from the equator? Answer: it’s impossible, if the earth is changing shape by the force of rotating, for rivers to flow away from the equator. What percentage of the earth is water? Answer 71% Are plains and plateaus flat and level? YES What percentage of the earth is plains? 15.95% of the earth and 55% of the land surface. What percentage of the earth is plateaus? 5.22% of the earth and 18% of the land surface. What percentage of the earth are hills and mountains? 7.83% of the earth and 27% of the land surface. Doesn’t it make more sense that since over 92% of the earth is covered with flat and level topography the earth should be flat instead of a sphere. YES Does it feel like we’re rotating 1000 miles an hour? NO Before you answer “in a plane you can’t feel velocity”, open the plane window and then say that. If the speed of sound is 767mph and the earth is rotating east at 1040mph…..@300mph faster than sound waves, how can anyone standing east of a sound hear the sound? IT IS IMPOSSIBLE. If commercial jets fly 600mph and the earth is rotating east at 1040 mph, why do eastbound and westbound planes reach their destinations in the same amount of time? Furthermore, how can an eastbound plane ever reach its destination if the earth is spinning faster than the jet is flying. And before you claim the atmosphere is moving along with the earth..how do you explain wind, jet steams and other air movement traveling in all directions (N S E W)? And before you claim “because of gravity”….. please explain in great detail exactly what gravity is and how gravity accomplishes moving certain air molecules and planes along with the earth rotation and totally ignores the other air/wind moving in all directions. Why can a helicopter with a west destination not just hover above the ground and wait for the earth rotating east to rotate underneath it? If you claim the helicopter is moving with the earth rotation because of gravity, then why are their claims of long range snipers having to adjust their shots because of the Coriolis Effect caused by the earth rotating………keep in mind it’s supposedly pulling on a bullet traveling at 1800mph. And if the Coriolis Effect is pulling a bullet left or right (depending on which side of the equator), why doesn’t it affect the flow of rivers?? Rivers flow in all directions no matter which side of the equator. Wouldn’t all rivers tend to flow towards the equator? How does gravity hold down a 70,000lb 18 wheeler but doesn’t pull a gnat to the ground….yet allows a 1Billion pound cloud float in the sky? Please explain this in great detail how gravity accomplishes this. YOU CAN’T The moon’s gravity is strong enough to pull the oceans weighing 49,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 pounds but cannot pull any other objects of less mass? It doesn’t affect gnats, feathers, leaves, dust, rain etc etc etc. MAKES ZERO SENSE. COULOMB’S LAW MAKES PERFECT SENSE. In what science experiment have you ever observed something that’s rotating with the force pulling inward instead of outward? YOU HAVEN’T When you stare at the sky does it look like the sun is moving or that the earth is moving? WHEN YOU STARE AT THE SOUTHERN SKY THE SUN AND MOON CLEARLY MOVE FROM EAST TO WEST. Does the sun and moon look roughly the same size? YES Each taking up one half of a degree of the visible sky? YES Does the sun look 93,000,000 miles away and does the moon look 238,000 miles away? NO Do you actually know the magnitude of 93,000,000 miles? YOU CLEARLY DON’T Does a compass make more sense on a flat level plane or on a sphere? PERFECT SENSE ON THE FLAT EARTH MODEL, EVERYONE IS POINTING TO THE NORTH IN THE CENTER. ON A GLOBE EVERYONE WOULD BR POINTING INTO “SPACE”. If Australians are using a compass which way is it pointing? “OUTER SPACE” If Americans are standing on the side of the globe where are their compasses actually pointing? “OUTER SPACE” If the earth were a level plane with a magnetic center, would everyone’s compass point in the same direction? YES Does a sextant tool work with a flat level horizon or a “curved“ horizon? FLAT Does an astrolabe work with a flat level horizon or a “curved“ horizon? FLAT On a globe which direction is up and which direction is down…..and are these directions the same for everyone? DIFFERENT FOR EVERYONE Would these directions be the same for everyone if everyone was on a flat level earth? SAME FOR EVERYONE Does the pictures and videos of the moon’s ground during the moon landings look like the same moon as the one you see in the sky at night? NOPE Why do space rockets never go straight up but arch like they are headed back toward the ground? BECAUSE THEY ARE DESIGNED TO CRASH INTO THE OCEAN..BERMUDA TRIANGLE AND POINT NEMO Have you researched the origins and history of the Bermuda Triangle phenomenon in the Atlantic Ocean and Point Nemo in the Pacific Ocean? YOU HAVEN’T Why do we see asteroids and meteors always fall to the horizon and we never see them coming up from the horizon? BECAUSE WE ARE NOT ON A GLOBE Would everyone on a globe not see asteroids and meteors shooting in all directions? YEP If GPS is really communicating from orbiting satellites then why are there millions of miles of underwater sea internet cables and communication towers every 3 miles on the highways? And why is there not service on every square inch of the globe? BECAUSE THERE ARE NO SUCH THING AS ORBITING SATELLITES IN SPACE Why does NASA admit they photoshop all images from space….. including pictures of the earth/globe? BECAUSE IT’S ALL A MONEY LAUNDERING LIE Why can you see stars perfectly from earth and not from the moon? If the moon has no atmosphere thus no reflection of its light..what would block the view of stars? AGAIN, DOESN’T ADD UP If the ISS has been manned in orbit over 8200 days straight and has orbited the earth over 130,000 times in 23 years and orbits the earth 16 times per day (every day nonstop)….why can’t we get live video feed of the earth and zoom in to the ground and see what is happening live at any location on earth? BECAUSE THE ISS IS A HOLLYWOOD STUDIO ON EARTH PRODUCING VIDEOS TO FOOL THE MASSES. Why do emergency plane landings work perfectly on a flat earth map and make zero sense on the globe model? These routes on the flat earth map are in a straight line but on a globe the emergency landing is thousands of miles out of the way? Have you ever plotted these? Would you like to compare them now? YOU HAVE NEVER RESEARCHED THIS AND YOU DON’T HAVE A CLUE. If satellites are real and orbiting the globe almost once per hour then why does Google Earth images not update at least once per day …. Or even once per week…. Or even once per month? BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE And why are there no real pictures of satellites in space….why are they all photoshopped CGI images? AGAIN, THEY ARE FAKE Do civil engineers and surveyors allow for the curvature of the earth? NO. THERE ARE WEBSITES THAT LIE ABOUT IT…BUT ASK ONE YOURSELF IN PERSON. Have you ever asked one if they have ever allowed for curvature in any project they have been a part of? YOU HAVE NEVER ASKED What is your personal definition of gravity….do not go to the internet to copy and paste…. What exactly is gravity….in your own words?

    • @neilthorpe7650
      @neilthorpe7650 5 дней назад

      It’s ok to not understand basic science, but it’s not ok to think you’re clever for it. Grow up.

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 5 дней назад

      Every single thing you wrote is either wrong or just a lie.

    • @ElisWrite
      @ElisWrite 5 дней назад

      You said a lot to say nothing at all.

    • @trailbossdan1
      @trailbossdan1 5 дней назад

      This is why proper education is so important

    • @guidourados
      @guidourados 5 дней назад

      Which platforms and SE you use to find good scientific articles about those experiments and theories you said has no evidences for? Please good sir share to me which platform you use so I can understand how you reached this mindset.

  • @riandcaz
    @riandcaz 5 дней назад

    Thanks for your video. I think you miss the point about why FEs say space is fake. Essentially it's because we live in a pressurised system. To have pressure you need containment. No containment means our gas pressure would be sucked into the vacuum of space. Secondly alot of ISS footage reveals the use harnesses and green screen manipulation. The images of planets are only images not photos likewise with the pictures of a spherical earth from supposed space. I became a flat earther from being presented with the information that standing water always seeks it's level. Oceans don't curve therefore. Aeroplane pitch data reveals straight and level flight at desired altitude and the pilot never adjusts for curvature of earth. Earth is measured and navigated flat. As regards to being in a cult....I research and think for myself about the evidence presented, I'm not asked to attend anywhere, pay any money or kept in check by mentors. I don't believe everything every flat earther says but base my understanding on what is proveable like the few points above. If you are unable to refute the few points as false that I've listed above then you have a " belief" in the globe and the images (not photos) you are presented by NASA and the popular heliocentrism of the day. You maybe without knowing it be in the globe cult like I once was. Please look into the evidence and please don't strawman all FEs as we are not all the same or think the same. Thanks

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 5 дней назад

      Gravity is the container. Explain why there is an atmospheric pressue of 14.6psi at sea level and 5psi at the top of Mt Everest with no barrier or container involved? " would be sucked into the vacuum of space" Vacuums don't suck. This one sentence alone shows you have the scientific intellect of a potato. "alot of ISS footage reveals the use harnesses and green screen manipulation" No they don't. People claim they do, but have zero evidence. "The images of planets are only images not photos" There are thousands of photos of the earth from space. Have you tried looking? "I became a flat earther from being presented with the information that standing water always seeks it's level." So thinking that level means flat (it doesn't). Congrats on basing an entire belief on a misunderstanding of a term rather than the overwhelming mountains of evidence that the earth is a sphere. "Oceans don't curve" Yes they do. You're parroting what your cult leaders tell you without actually checking. "Aeroplane pitch data reveals straight and level flight at desired altitude and the pilot never adjusts for curvature of earth." You don't understand how planes work. You're parroting what your cult leaders tell you without actually checking. "Earth is measured and navigated flat." No it's not. Every professional navigator, surveyor and scientist involved in geodesy disagrees with you. No-one who ever says this has ever provided actually measurements of flatness. You're parroting what your cult leaders tell you without actually checking. "I research and think for myself about the evidence presented" Except you just proved the complete opposite by parroting all the flat earth memes without actually researching any of them. "Please look into the evidence" Done it. It all shows the earth to be a rotating spherical planet. Why haven't you?

    • @tims5268
      @tims5268 5 дней назад

      Every single thing you said is wrong and high school science student could understand why. The gradient of pressure is all you need to understand why your claims are incorrect. We DO have whole photographs of earth. Level doesn't mean flat. Oceans do curve and it is measurable, even the fact that you can have high tide on one side of the ocean and low tide on the other proves oceans aren't flat. When you understand gravity you will understand why a plane doesn't need to pitch. Seriously, read a book.

    • @riandcaz
      @riandcaz 5 дней назад

      @tims5268 you just said I'm wrong and told me to read a book? Pretty condescending without addressing the facts factually. Now please explain how gas pressure without containment can exist beside a vacuum.? Please explain how standing water curves around a spinning globe? Please explain what sea level is on a globe? Also what level & plumb are on a globe? Please explain how gravity makes an aeroplane adjust for curvature automatically? Maybe a high school student could answer better perhaps?

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 5 дней назад

      @@riandcaz "Now please explain how gas pressure without containment can exist beside a vacuum.?" You think that a vacuum is a complete absence of matter (it isn't) and that it sucks (it doesn't). There is a pressure gradient due to gravity from around 14.6psi at sea level, to around 5psi at the top of Mt Everest (no barrier or container in between you'll notice) down to around 10^-17 torr in what we term space. "Please explain how standing water curves around a spinning globe?" Gravity. "Please explain what sea level is on a globe?" The average surface level of one or more bodies of water. From the Merriam Webster dictionary: Level (adjective): having no part higher than another : conforming to the curvature of the liquid parts of the earth's surface "Also what level & plumb are on a globe?" Level has multiple definitions and meanings. If you mean referring to sea level, see above. Plumb in the same context is perfectly vertical, i.e. the same vector as gravity, towards the centre of the earth relative to your position on the surface. "Please explain how gravity makes an aeroplane adjust for curvature automatically?" It doesn't. Maybe learn how planes work before sounding even dumber. "Maybe a high school student could answer better perhaps?" Yes, a high school student would probably already understand these concepts and be able to explain them to you.

    • @tims5268
      @tims5268 5 дней назад

      @@riandcaz Gas pressure is on a gradient as has already been pointed out to you. Extrapolate outwards and you eventually get a pressure of zero without the need for a container, pretty simple stuff huh. Vacuums have no force, they don't suck, so gravity is more than sufficient to keep our atmosphere here on earth. Water curves round a globe because of gravity, mass attracts mass. This has been proven by several experiments including the Cavendish and Schehallion experiments. 'Level' is at the same height or perpendicular to earth's gravity. Level does not mean flat. The oceans are both level AND curved. Plumb means perfectly vertical, essentially it means it is pointing towards the centre of the earth. Planes stay level when the forces of lift and thrust are equal to the forces of weight and drag. Pilots call this equilibrium. This means the plane will keep altitude around the curve of the earth without having to make any adjustments. This is all incredibly basic stuff you could have easily found out for yourself. Maybe next time, when you don't understand how something works, look it up instead of assuming every scientist, mathematician, politician, cartographer, astronomer, etc is in on a giant hoax and YOU are the one to have seen through it all.

  • @aaronbcole
    @aaronbcole 5 дней назад

    Look at that fisheye shot

  • @aaronbcole
    @aaronbcole 5 дней назад

    The fake moon landing and the animated space walk didn’t help the nasa cause - so you can’t trust the space agencies

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 5 дней назад

      I dunno about the fake one. I only know about the 6 real ones. Maybe inform yourself better.

    • @GuardianSoulkeeper
      @GuardianSoulkeeper 3 дня назад

      There was a fake moon landing?

  • @aaronbcole
    @aaronbcole 5 дней назад

    The flatters say we all live in a Catholic sun cult the past 500 Years -

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 5 дней назад

      Nobody thought Earth was flat 500 years ago, and certainly not the Catholic Church.

  • @aaronbcole
    @aaronbcole 5 дней назад

    The new tests show we see too far- and I didn’t see anything spinning under me on my recent flight

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 5 дней назад

      "The new tests show we see too far" Go on then, present your data and how you came to that conclusion. You do realise that this is one of the dumbest things flerfs say, since if the earth was flat we can't see anywhere near as far as we should be able to. "I didn’t see anything spinning under me on my recent flight" So like every flerf you have no concept of reference frames or conservation of momentum.

    • @GuardianSoulkeeper
      @GuardianSoulkeeper 3 дня назад

      You mean the tests show we don't see far enough.

  • @aaronbcole
    @aaronbcole 5 дней назад

    Catching the ISS goons on harnesses and using CGI doesn’t help the ‘science’ cause

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 5 дней назад

      Just as well that's never happened then.

    • @ribbles1699
      @ribbles1699 3 дня назад

      Flerf RUclipsrs take this to an extreme. 30 seconds of an ISS astronaut doing somersaults, a pocket that you imagine is the anchor for a wire, a few video compression artifacts to sneer at. They fail to include the rest of the continuous 30-60 minute video showing weightlessness the entire time, including passing through multiple thresholds. Where are the wires then?

    • @aaronbcole
      @aaronbcole 3 дня назад

      @ there are several videos- busted on harnesses -

    • @MrEjwheeler
      @MrEjwheeler 3 дня назад

      @@aaronbcole Yet strangely in not one of them is an actual harness visible. Flerfs also have no idea how hard it is to rig up harnesses to simulate weightlessness, or what suspension trauma is.

    • @ribbles1699
      @ribbles1699 3 дня назад

      @@aaronbcole again, what about the rest of the videos? Where is the harness when an astronaut is giving a tour of the station, floating through modules and hatches? How do you imagine a harness keeping them in perfectly smooth flight when the distance to the ceiling keeps changing? Keeping in mind that many of these videos are live-streamed, with kids asking questions in real time. As in no opportunity to digitally remove the wires and whatever rails you imagine they hang from.

  • @rickkwitkoski1976
    @rickkwitkoski1976 5 дней назад

    But but but... TFE JUST went to Antarctica!! Flerfs are just conspiracy believers. Read: "Off the Edge" - Kelly Weill She goes at the conspiracy believer from the point of flat earthers. Good read. Good info. YES! 10 K meters and you begin to see the curvature. My flights over the Pacific, I've said this. Other people say you can't until about 15 K meters but I've looked to see the curve at much lower altitudes.

    • @ForbiddTV
      @ForbiddTV 4 дня назад

      I can easily show curvature at just 400 feet.

  • @ChuckyMcNubbin72
    @ChuckyMcNubbin72 5 дней назад

    Flat earthers are a conspiracy. They conspire with each other to come up with new ways to convince scientifically illiterate people into opening up their wallets.

  • @ikosk.7381
    @ikosk.7381 5 дней назад

    Electra - Taygeta is one of the best trading routes in Elite dangerous.

  • @pwolkowicki
    @pwolkowicki 5 дней назад

    FE like to use Nikon P1000. Use it with a sun filter to photograf Sun throug the day. It doesn't change it's size (at least in easily mesurable way) because it's not 6000 miles above, but far, far away, and the change of 8000 miles of Earth's diameter doesn't change it's size much. The other way - paralactic mount - wouldn't work on flat Earth the way it works.

  • @WhotheHellknowsAnyway
    @WhotheHellknowsAnyway 6 дней назад

    Can any one please help me figure out this conundrum concerning aeroplanes on a globe. Today I picked up a 24 " world globe model and 2 miniature toy planes, I then attached one plane to Greenland and the other to Argentina, but I was shocked to find the plane in Argentina was upside down. So what sorcery would be required to land the plane or am I missing something in the illusion?

    • @ElisWrite
      @ElisWrite 5 дней назад

      Is this supposed to be a "gotcha" comment.

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 5 дней назад

      The concept of "down" is too hard for you?

    • @WhotheHellknowsAnyway
      @WhotheHellknowsAnyway 5 дней назад

      @@briansomething5987 Yes please explain

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 5 дней назад

      @WhotheHellknowsAnyway down is towards the earth. Gee, that was tough.

    • @WhotheHellknowsAnyway
      @WhotheHellknowsAnyway 5 дней назад

      @@briansomething5987 So far no glober has answered my question with a proper explanation that encompasses logic

  • @ICSpin
    @ICSpin 6 дней назад

    Fantastic images

  • @deepskytrekkin9600
    @deepskytrekkin9600 6 дней назад

    First, I am a fellow Astrophotographer with 10 years experience, second, I too have imaged several of the targets you shared in this video. I have this fantasy that the flat folks get together and elect four or five of their fellow flat folks to be their representatives. Next, Elon Musk would provide the elected flat folk representatives the same ‘ride’ to the edge of space that William Shatner enjoyed. Before going up this group would be allowed any reasonable opportunity to validate or invalidate the ‘ride’. All possible trickery and/or illusion would thereby be eliminated. Fellow flat folks could film and document the whole thing. Perhaps upon their return they could simply shut-up. Hey Elon you could offer and then the ball would be in their court. Then we could suggest “Take the ride or shut-up.” Just a thought.

    • @ForbiddTV
      @ForbiddTV 4 дня назад

      Go one better, a one way trip to the moon. Make sure to give them live streaming ability so we can watch the chaos.

  • @surferstevo
    @surferstevo 6 дней назад

    Looking at the lights in the sky doesn't show the shape of the earth.

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 6 дней назад

      Well, it can. But it involves something called "thinking", which somebody who just parrots grifter nonsense would be unfamiliar with.

    • @surferstevo
      @surferstevo 6 дней назад

      @briansomething5987 Yes I agree. You should start doing some thinking. Start with questioning everything.

    • @briansomething5987
      @briansomething5987 6 дней назад

      @surferstevo it's not that difficult. If you know the shape and motion of Earth, then you can predict where things will be in sky at a given location, date, and time. Then all you have to do is look. On the other hand, if you have no clue about the shape and motion of Earth, then you make wildly incorrect predictions like "there is no 24 hour sun in Antarctica".

    • @iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367
      @iveneverseensuchbehaviorin5367 5 дней назад

      I figured out the shape of the earth by looking at the sky. Tis a shame you can't figure it out.

    • @guidourados
      @guidourados 5 дней назад

      The video literally says you can buy weather balloons and cameras without distortions to see the curvature, yet you can only parrot what the grifters say, how is that "do your own research"?