What is the Evidence Jesus Rose from the Dead? SeanMcDowell.org
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- For more information, read Evidence that Demands A Verdict, co-written by Sean and Josh McDowell (amzn.to/2sJLy7S)
READ: "The Resurrection Answers 3 Big Questions" (bit.ly/39tt3UL)
DESCRIPTION: Is there good evidence for the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus? What historical facts are most compelling? Sean briefly answers these questions.
Love this guy. He comes up on my utube rotation always teaching and preaching and in great long form interviews about all sorts of terrific discussions even between himself a believer and atheists being respectful and decent. I learn so much from him and his great guests from archeologists to scientists to philosophers and so on. His father's books are great and this guy's work has helped me so much in my struggle to repent and come back to the Lord. In my my mind this guy has a great heart for people which I admire so much in my learning to love others again. The anger is so much less now, thank God for Jesus and His incredible mercy and patience. Thank God also for people like Sean McDowell who is so generous with his knowledge and friends.
“Not a removal of dirt that saved u but an appeal to Christ for a good conscious” 1 Peter 3:21
"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and the Word became flesh". The person Jesus Christ is both fully God and fully man.
Amen brother, jesus christ is alive because he is God made flesh. I cant imagine the great lengths he went to in order that we be saved. Thanks to him we will never be hurt by the second death
A quotation from an ancient book of mythology used to make claims and assertions.
@@nauticalnavigator3688 And exactly how did Jesus's death save us from sin? How can Jesus forgive what you did to somebody else? If you owe me an apology, you damn well better give it to me and not to some Phantom
You have fairy tales, not evidence.
Keep them coming Dr McDowell! Each of your posts equip us with the truth and reasons to go out into the world and make disciples of all men. Thank you.
where dose it say jesus apeared to paul act: 9syas he saw a brght lght and heared a voice and who were the 5 hundred? and paul didnt even know who jesus was
1 for 15:3-8
You are making a physical claim of an alleged JC rising from the dead. What is your physical evidence?
Hi was told you had extrabiblical evidence of the resurrection. Is there a video? Isn’t it all that matters?
We walk by faith, not by sight. We don't need historical facts that we can touch, all we need is Jesus. When you have Him, you have it all.
You love a fairy tale.
@@walkergarya What is a woman?
@@lukypoco3663 A woman is simply defined as a female adult human.
Facts? More like wild baseless assumptions.
1 There are many conflicting takes on an actual historical Jesus. So we can't just take it as a fact.
2 This claimed Jesus guy was 'shamed' by his enemies not his allies. By having your enemy go so far out of their way to 'shamed' you, means you are doing something right.
3 The tomb (which no one can agree on where it even is) being found by men would of made the story less believable. Because it was the woman's job to clean tombs. Why would men be there? They would have to invent a reason for them to be there.
4 This idea that a woman's testimony was worthless is false. Josephus talked about women testifying.
5 they most likely invented the tomb as the overwhelming majority of crucifixion victims were thrown into a mass-unmarked-grave. Having him in an actual tomb would allow them to say the tomb was empty.
5 You only have Paul and even that was not a physical Jesus. The 500 is hearsay from years after the supposed event.
6 There is no evidence that any of these disciples died for thirty beliefs.
You presented absolutely no evidence for a man rising from his grave.
Horrible refutation
@@fredarroyo7429 Horrible Reply, zero value in it.
@Humean Lots so you still.cant prove why its reasonable to treat historical sources as unreliable because there isnt corroboration from " out crowd " sources other than the fallacious reasoning that the "experts say so" and " you use fallacies to so.i can use them" which has been debunked that i dont use appeal to authority fallacy like you are. So are you going to prove that this criteria is objection, your biggest objection you have towards the evidence
@Humean Lots strawman, resurrection isnt just one claim, there are more than one independent historical sources that document many claims..
Do you have to depend on strawmans to justify an arbritary criteria that you have not given objective evidence beyond your opinionand beyond an appeal to authority fallacy.
You havent proven why multiple historical sources with zero errors corraborating a claim isnt sufficient beyond " i dont think so" and relying on thr argument of fallacy , " their silence on out crowd corrobarating sources proves its not true".
Why do you depend on SOOO many fallacies for all your objections??
@Humean Lots 1. Gospel of Matthew 2. Gospel of Mark 3. Gospel of Luke 4. Gospel of John 5. Book of Acts. 6. 1 letter to Corinthians. These are 6 individual works by individual authors, different walks of.life, individual works are considered different sources.
I asked you 3 times already. Can you give objective evidence why the argument of ignorance fallacy " sources from the in crowd are not reliable unless they are corroborated by out crowd sources" is justified other than " because I feel it is" or " the experts say- appeal to authority fallacy" . Because i call this objection baloney
1&2. Pretty mundane, Jesus lived and he died.
3. First off we have no good reason to posit a tomb of any sort. Secondly, this argument about women discovering the body is entirely stupid. Women did this work so why would this be done by anyone else? Also the testimony relates to a court setting, not social ones. The people talking about a stolen body would probably be in response to these claims being made about a stolen body. Have you ever granted a point for the sake of argument to show how something doesn’t work even if you give it a stronger case?
4. Out of all supposed post death experiences we have good evidence for one, Paul. This is because he himself describes what he experienced and thus likely had some sort of experience. Additionally it’s reasonable to posit that maybe a couple disciples/those close to Jesus also had an experience although we have no reliable documentation of this. Regardless all appearance claims, except for Paul, are entirely hearsay.
5. Willingness to die. For the sake of argument let’s just grant this. So what? People who believe in a false thing act the same way they would if said thing was true so why would we expect them to act differently?
5. Not knowingly. If you know something is a lie why die for it.
@@tonyr6365
Why would we think they knew it was a lie? Is this the only option? No. People are convinced of false things all the time, does this prove truth? Not even in the slightest. And even granting your position, what’s more reasonable to assume: that people willingly died for a lie or that a man rose from the dead?
@@arcticpangolin3090 I was wrong. I thought that it wasn't possible for a person to die for a lie(edit they knew was a lie). I still believe Jesus rose from the dead.
Other than Paul who NEVER saw a physical Jesus,
1. The names of the gospels are assigned to them at a much later time.
2. These gospels have NO KNOWN named authors.
3. These gospels were written decades after the events.
4. NOWHERE in any of Mark, Luke or Mathew is there any note of "I saw this".
5. The gospels are mutually contradictory.
6. The gospels have been added to over time.
7. The gospels are contradicted by Roman and Jewish practices of that time.
8. Events like the "Star of Bethlehem, the Earthquake when Jesus "died", the mid afternoon darkness, the dead of Jeruselem rising from their graves are NOT supported by any other record.
I have studied the known historical facts and your Jesus fairy tale is NOT THERE.
Great video!
This man saw how wealthy Kenneth Copeland became by peddling dreams, so he embraced the business plan with fervor. Tell people what they WANT to hear and they open their wallets. Intelligence and gullibility are not mutually exclusive, for emotions trump both in the hierarchy of decision making. Ironically, it's the same pattern used for womanizing- if they like what they see and you tell them what they want to hear, they open more than their purses. Religion is "predatory behavior".
Just like darwin. Tell the god haters what they want to hear and they ll make you rich
@@fredarroyo7429
Someone can't hate that which they don't think exists. If the Abrahamic deity did exist I WOULD hate it.
@@fredarroyo7429 I simply "accept" the fact that there is no God as described in the different doctrines, it's not what I "want" to believe, but what my God-given ability to reason has enabled me to conclude.
@@duncanbryson1167 Thats proof that "Atheists" know God exists because they hate Him. Lol
@@davidschneide5422 Yeah sometimes people can be honest and still wrong yet honest.
You also could of mentioned that the Roman soldiers were ordered to guard Jesus’s tomb with the threat of death if they allowed someone else to steal the body. When the angel scared the soldiers and put them to sleep they had to explain this to their superiors. So this proves that the body was not removed by any natural person or process.
No, these are stories from the gospel and have no supporting evidence. This is not proof of anything.
@@walkergarya Gospels are an eyewitness recording of history. They are not stories or fables as some may think.
@@fredsalfa Nope. NOTHING in the gospels is an eyewitness account. Paul NEVER saw Jesus in the flesh and the others never even claim to be witnesses to their accounts.
@@walkergarya Matthew and John were eyewitnesses. Mark and Luke’s were from interviews with eyewitness. Please try and study historical facts about the Bible from scholarly articles and not from unsubstantiated random sources. Thank you
@@fredsalfa Nope. Other than Paul who NEVER saw a physical Jesus,
1. The names of the gospels are assigned to them at a much later time.
2. These gospels have NO KNOWN named authors.
3. These gospels were written decades after the events.
4. NOWHERE in any of Mark, Luke or Mathew is there any note of "I saw this".
5. The gospels are mutually contradictory.
6. The gospels have been added to over time.
7. The gospels are contradicted by Roman and Jewish practices of that time.
8. Events like the "Star of Bethlehem, the Earthquake when Jesus "died", the mid afternoon darkness, the dead of Jeruselem rising from their graves are NOT supported by any other record.
I have studied the known historical facts and your Jesus fairy tale is NOT THERE. >
Frank Morison was the literary pseudonym for Albert Henry Ross (1881-1950), a journalist and novelist who grew up in Stratford-on-Avon, England. 'I owe Morison a great debt of gratitude. 'Who Moved the Stone?' was an important early link in a long chain of evidence that God used to bring me into his kingdom. Bing search
You don't need to have a doctorate in theology or to be a scholar to know God's plan and Jesus promises to those who put their trust in him.The apostle Paul clearly stated that if Jesus did not rose from the dead then there is no resurrection and therefore we (Christians who put their faith in Christ) are to be pitted!.I rather believe Paul and the rest of the apostles who claimed to be eyewitnesses of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ resurrection and ascension to heaven.If Jesus did not literally resurrected from the dead then the apostles were liars and deceivers, I don't think so!.
The Gospel is based on this promise:to those who repent from their sins and put their faith in Jesus Christ, Jesus promised these 3 things: 1-their sins will be forgiven 2-They will be resurrected from the dead in a new incorruptible body and 3-will have eternal life in Gods kingdom!. Let God and Jesus Our Lord be truthful and faithful and let man be called a liar and deceitful.I for one choose to trust and believe the all Mighty all knowing God and his Holly Son Jesus Christ
Amen
I am unimpressed by the quality of "evidence" for the resurrection.
@Humean Lots Yup.
@Humean Lots why does any claims that the biblical sources produce need external " outcrowd" sources to substantiate them?
@Humean Lots In court, if we had multiple witnesses in a family corraborating testimonies that a person committed a crime, they wouldnt count the family as one unsubstantianted claim, they would weigh the claims of each family member individually, and if they corrobarate the claim that a person committed a crime, they wouldnt dismiss it saying we had to because there wasnt corrobarating evidence from a person outside of the family. No thats still a strong case.
Just regarding the empty tomb, we have five different sources making 5 claims that corrobarate with one another , but you call that one claim instead of mutiple, and when you throw the mormons in their , the mormon books have one source, one claim, book of mormon, yet you call them claims, of course this is unsubstantiated.
You keep avoiding the answer, and answer strawmans. I DIDNT ask if one person makes a claim , why do you need external corrobaration.
Im asking , like with the empty tomb, if a claim is corrobarated by 5 sources, why is it not considered substantiated unless there are " out crowd" claims to corrobate them.?
You have a lot of fallacious reasoning.
@Humean Lots You are pretty much saying if we had multiple witnesses of a family corraborating testimonies that a person committed a crime, your saying we shouldnt count the weight of the individual independent multiple witnesses in a family as a substantiatial because there isnt a guy from outside of the " cult family" corrobarating the claim.
If you said that as a judge or lawyer , youd be disbarred.
The gospels were written immediately after the rrsurrection not after. They would of been rejected immediately if they had been embellished like you claim they were. The gospels are greco roman historical biographies they dont need to be in the format of a first hand witness for them to be sunstantial. They had access to records and the people who were there as well as themselves. Your hearsay objection doesmt make any sense
@Humean Lots Yes absolutely. If there are multiple reliable witnesses and they all happen to be in one family. And all their testimony corrobarate a claim that someone committed a crime then all those testimonies put together are substantial evidence for the claim. So many people have been thrown into jail on the weight of the testimony of 2 witnesses. Youd be disbarred for sure.
You keep strawmaning saying a claim is not evidence for itself. No one is disagreeing with that. We are saying multiple testimonies put together are substantial evidence for that claim being true.
...woops. Pardon me, Dr. McDowell: You need a fact, or facts, which generate a question which current models can't explain; i.e., an anomaly. Find a question, sir, THEN, you can formulate a hypothesis to explain it.
This isn't very good evidence. This can't be the best you've got.
What would be stronger then?
@@LeslieFlemonsTo demonstrate a resurrection? I don't know what would be stronger but these aren't very convincing arguments at all. There are better (mundane) explanations for everything he says here. These are weak arguments that were put to bed years ago. I'm not sure why this guy keeps saying this stuff like he doesn't know better
The Bible
Why should I believe the Bible?
Because it's the word of God
How do I know it's the word of God?
Because it says so in the Bible dummy.
Circular reasoning.
And a Muslim could argue the same about the Qur'an:
This is the book in which there is no doubt, a guide for the righteous.
Also circular logic.
Its self evident its the word of Gof
@Humean Lots I just keep proving you false equivacation fallacies have no merit
@@fredarroyo7429 No it's not.
@@houghton841 sure abd 2plus2 is not self evidently 4 and ice is not self evidently cold. Your view of reality is absurd
GREAT skit; should definitely be on SNL; Just awesome, luv it.
Let's say a man named Jesus rose from the dead. How does that prove he created our universe?
Because he claimed to be God
Because only a God can raise himself from the dead by his own power..
How do you know?
So even if Jesus rose from the dead, it doesn't mean he couldn't be a liar.
Jennifer Earles okay we’ll go find another person who rises from the dead and tell me how they did it.
Sean McDowell puts words in Gods mouth.
How so?
@@toplobster1040 He feels ownership of his brand. Feels entitled to speak for "god". Great product rep, though! Great sales pitch!
@Jacob Ward worship of the bible is idolatry. The bible was written by mortal men.
Man has placed his own work on a pedestal, not gawd almighty.
I notice you copy and paste duplicate comments (or "spam") quite a lot
@Jacob Ward I 'm the one who said he worships the bible, the book itself. He worships the work of men. Idolatry
@@toplobster1040 he doesn’t place words in anyone’s mouth. He was very clear on providing historical facts and not assumptions in his reasons to believe in the resurrection. He refers to both biblical and extra biblical text in his reasoning. This would not be an example of worshiping the Bible.
I wish Sean could stand outside of his religious bubble.
"Jesus died on the cross"--is Jesus the only person to be crucified? What makes his crucifixion special? Appealing to the Bible is circular reasoning. Christian and non-christian writers alike were repeating what Christians BELIEVED. Christians suppressed, destroyed, and failed to preserve writings that didn't align with their theology. Many Jews that were contemporary with Jesus did not believe he was the Messiah despite his miraculous deeds and claims of divinity. Jesus did not meet the criteria for a Messiah or a perfect sin sacrifice according to the OT.
"The tomb was empty"--which tomb is the real one---the Talpiot Family Tomb, the Garden Tomb, or Church of the Holy Sepulchre? Apparently Mary Magdalene knew where the tomb of Jesus was as she went there on Easter morning...why wasn't it venerated? Why would Mary go to a sealed tomb to anoint a body that would make her impure?
"Jesus appeared to people"--Elvis appeared to people after his death. The Virgin Mary appeared to people. Dead loved ones appear to people to this day. Does Sean believe these appearances? He also has no evidence to substantiate that all the disciples were willing to suffer and die for their beliefs (see Paulogia rebuttal) but even if I grant that they did, that doesn't make their beliefs true.
This is just not true... Jesus' crucifixion was special because he did nothing wrong, he was the perfect Lamb of God. Jews didn't believe he was the Messiah because they were blind and did not want to accept change, even though they saw His miracles. How did Jesus not meet the 'criteria' for a Messiah or a perfect sin sacrifice according to the OT? There's literally a whole book about it... As for the tomb, we don't know which tomb was the real one because it was never recorded in Scripture. It wasn't 'venerated' because they didn't care about the stupid tomb cause someone has just risen from the dead! Why would they stop and, instead of going to tell others as they did, build a monument to the tomb he was buried in?? Mary went to anoint the body because she didn't care if it made her impure or not. She's the one who washed Jesus' feet with her hair. All she cared about was serving the Messiah, and when he died, she just wanted to pay her respects and mourn. Jesus appeared to five hundred people at once after his resurrection, and those that saw were willing to die for what they believed. Were the people who hallucinated seeing Elvis or Mary or ghosts willing to die for what they saw? There is obvious evidence for the apostles martyrdom everywhere and I don't think many people disagree with that.
@@bliots8369 You might try reading "Crucifying the Bible" by Deborah Grace if you want to know why Jesus did not meet the criteria for Messiah or a perfect sin sacrifice. Also, Dragons in Genesis Podcast is another excellent source for all things biblical.
You brush off everything I say with unsubstantiated assertions. Even Sean was open to correction when Paulogia pointed out that he overstated his case regarding the 500 witnesses and the apostle's martyrdom.
The blessed virgin Mary has been well attested to showing up to groups...do you believe those mass hallucinations? If not, why do you believe 500 people saw Jesus? Did they die for what they saw?
Your reasoning is so far afield of anything logical and loaded with assumptions I can only think you believe DESPITE the evidence, not because of it.
That is not even a case for that Jesus did exist...
You’re going up against virtually all reputable scholars when you say that, even skeptics.
@@Nameless-pt6oj no. There are many people that ask if Jesus did exist and who he then was.
Jesus definitely existed. No question about that. The real question is whether He is the Son of God or not? You can prove that through the resurrection, which is what Christianity is built on. If you can prove the resurrection, you can prove that He is the Son of God, and prove that Christianity is true, also proving that Islam and Judaism is false. Watch Inspiring Philosophy, Cold Case Christianity, Lee Strobel and Gary Habermas.
@@Nameless-pt6oj cold case christianity I have talk with. He has nothing that prove Jesus.
Someone like Jesus at that time? Sure. Many. Was any of the other son of god? If someone today make that claim it is jail or the nuthouse...
That’s ridiculous. J. Wallace has great proof for Jesus, he’s answered many questions on his site. All you need to do to prove Christianity is to prove the resurrection. That’s literally all you need to do. We know that Jesus definitely existed and was definitely crucified, and the Gospels can be used to prove the resurrection. Watch Inspiring Philosophy, see how he does it.
Do they give PHD's away to anybody these days?
yes, pretty much! He's charming tho, in a way william Craig is not..
.
@@richiejohnson Being charming does not make him right.
@@garywalker447 you got me.
[retreats in shame]
Well, apparently it helps if you’re willing to make spelling mistakes in the first ten seconds of your videos. That’s the only qualification I see here.
While there is plenty of evidence to prove the resurrection, it can’t be condensed into a three minute video.
Epistemic category error: There can be only probability, not proof, for empirical inquires. And you must first have A VALID question to explain--a question generated from a scientifically valid anomaly. The "resurrection hypothesis doesn't have this. Try again.
I came here not expecting much. And alas, the search for evidence continues.
I think a god would have left better evidence of his existence then stuff people (nobody even knows who)wrote in a book,
anything can be written in a book, or ''books''
as christians like to point out.
\/ The sad truth is no amount of evidence would convince you. I'm so sure of this next bit, that you have a presuppositional bias against extra natural occurrences that reasons in a circle. You've already come to the conclusion that it is impossible before you even started to examine if it is possible. This is what it means to hold a presuppositional bias. You will NEVER, under any circumstances, no matter how much evidence is given, as long as you hold to your presuppositional bias, be able to examine things fairly and break free from your circular reasoning to know if something is true or not. All the evidences put together is overwhelming when examined closely and fairly. When it is you will not be able to deny that his resurrection is the most reasonable conclusion given among all the possibilities. All other are left wanting, and littered with problems with their explanations. I know what that means. But it's the only one that makes sense of the evidence regardless of how anyone, including me feels about extra natural occurrences being possible. You think about that...
@@frankwhelan1715 there would be no such thing as thinking or evidence if there was no God
Doctor of Mumbo Jumbo. Willingness to die for a delusion is not proof of the delusion. We can all just sit back and wait for this nonsense to go out of style.
The point is: They would not willingly be martyred for something they KNEW was false. Many Muslims kill themselves because they believe the Quran is true. But none of them would do so if they KNEW they made it all up or they KNEW it was false.
@@bradacre5672 exactly
@@bradacre5672
Japanese soldiers, sailors and airmen died for their emperor because they they thought (had been indoctrinated into believing) that he was a god.
@Humean Lots You are assuming Paul never saw Jesus in His life and had nothing to compare Him to. And why would Paul change His mind about Jesus if He ONLY saw an apparaition. It doesnt make sense. Also you couldnt answer the question. Why would we need corrabortsion from the " outside crowd" how is that not an argument from silence that if we dont have that then its not valid??
@Humean Lots Okay so again an argument from silence fallacy. You.are assuming Paul never saw Jesus cause he is silent on him saying he saw him. Do you care that your thoughts are fallacious?
" Ancient Historians" okay.so appeal to authority / expert fallacy.
Hey when you come up with good reasoning thats not fallacious. Ill shut up.
The historians do not say his tomb was empty. They say his followers believe he rose from the dead. I dont care what his friends said, I do not worship men, or the images of men, or the names of men.
"I do not worship men, or the images of men, or the names of men." Jesus would agree with you.
But they do. The jews admit it was empty but for another reason
@@fredarroyo7429 Maybe you should listen to a Jew.
ruclips.net/video/O7PLUrCsz6s/видео.html
@Humean Lots We have the early jewish talmuld say the body was stolen. This admits there was an empty tomb
@Humean Lots Nah if i did, then id be like mike winger and say well.i dont have to substantiate my case for these 5 facts( facts given in the video). I could just say that the majority of historians agree these are facts so that settles it. ( that would be an appeal to authority)
I never once said that. The sources are available for everyone to see themselves. I am arguing why they are facts based on the sources alone. Not relying on what the historians say about them. So no that accusation doesnt hold up either
I marvel at how many skeptics and unbelievers frequent Christian channels to mock Christianity. They are only proving the Bible and the God they deny to be true. Besides, why spend your time making fun of something you don't believe in? LOL... SMH
The reason folks like me push back is because religious folks in the USA try to impose their religion on my family. That's why.
If religious people would keep their private religion in their families and churches, we wouldn't push back.
Jesus is God's Son. Jesus was born by the virgin Mary who conceived by God. Jesus never sinned. Jesus was crucified and die for the sins of the world. Jesus Blood was shed for the forgiveness of sins. Jesus was entombed for three days. Jesus was raised from the dead by God. Jesus left the tomb. Jesus was seen, heard and touched by witnesses who said Jesus is alive. Jesus ascended to heaven. Jesus will return to the earth. Jesus is Lord. IF you confess with your mouth Jesus Lord and believe in your heart God has raised Jesus from the dead you shall be saved. Any one who calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved. For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son, Jesus, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life. God is Love. Eternal Life is knowing God forever. Jesus said, "No greater love has one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends." Look up: Romans 8:31-39 You are a created being. John 6:40. 1 Corinthians:3-8. Isaiah:53+last three verses of 52. 1John:1:8-9
Sorry but all you have are a lot of claims about Jesus but there is NO evidence to show these are more than just claims. You have dogma, not evidence.
How many times you gonna post this same comment lol
The very fact that apostles died for their testimony is too compelling
I don’t think that is a good argument because many have given there life for all the other religions of the world and completely fabricated cults like heavens gates, which obviously weren’t true
Then dont believe it! But, when you get on the other side, you will be unpleasantly surprised.
@@Doomer610 the only issue with that statement is that islamic extremists kill themselves while killing others. Jesus apostles were tortured and killed by others unwilling to end their life short, not taking other lives with them
@Humean Lots no, people died at the hands of other people for no cause. The disciples died at the hands of evil people because of a good cause.
@@nauticalnavigator3688 may Allah have mercy on your soul🙏
There is no good evidence for Jesus let alone for his "resurrection".
Of course there is
@@fredarroyo7429 You have contradictory stories, nothing more.
@Hannah Barry 1. There is no evidence for your god either.
2. Faith is lying to yourself to believe nonsense there is no evidence for.
@@garywalker447 zero contradictions
@Humean Lots Krishna was not a historical person like Jesus Christ was
i like your sus ,je
Keep making these videos. There is a cottage industry dedicated to debunking these tired excuses. And it is fodder to expose the emptiness of these claims and educate more atheists and "nones" as to why these flimsy claims are ridiculous. You're actually helping by create more of them by providing fodder for logical deconstruction.
?
If we are wrong you have nothing to loose but if you are wrong you have everything to loose and whether you like it or not one day you will bow and say Jesus is King
@@tana7256 Pascal's Wager is nonsense. Pascal’s Wager is a fool’s bet because there are NOT two options. There are tens of thousands. Yours is NOT the only religion, man has invented tens of thousands of religions in the past few thousand years. This is an example of the Special Pleading Fallacy, where all other religions are wrong except yours. You have no good reason why your flavor of christianity is any more “true” than any other. Even if there is a true religion, the odds are, you do not know what that is.
People don't rise from the dead. It's against the laws of the nature. We humans are animals. We are born, we live and we die. This is what we observe, always. This also applies to Jesus. There is no exception.
Lol your all over these videos trying to argue saying humans are like animals. Never seen a human eaten for food like an animal. Never seen a human as a pet like an animal…
@@MrSturdystratusI recommend you to read a book about chimpanzees and gorillas. 🙂🦧🦍
@@MrRosendal nice comeback by telling me to read a book about monkeys. Still didn’t address my points of animals being farmed by humans, being eaten for food by humans, being pets for humans. With those 3 facts humans have dominion over animals clearly making a distinction
@@MrSturdystratus Yes, we humans have become the master of all creatures on earth. This is obvious. But like 20 000 years ago we lived like the apes. Chimpanzees, gorillas and humans are closely related to each other. We belong to the same group in the animal kingdom. The great apes. So we humans are apes. We share 99 % of our genes with the chimpanzees. So this book will be a fun read. 🦍🦧🚶
@@MrSturdystratus The definition of an animal is a multicellular organism with an internal digestive track. Humans are animals.
Cringe.....
Wow...that's some crappy evidence.
What evidence do you want
Sorry but all you have are a lot of claims about Jesus but there is NO evidence to show these are more than just claims. You have dogma, not evidence.
I guess evidence doesnt mean what it use to anymore
@@fredarroyo7429 No, Evidence means what it always means, that just was not applied to the fairy tales in the bible.
@@walkergarya exactly, evidence doesnt mean evidence anymore when its evidence that confirms anything in the bible.
@@fredarroyo7429 No. If you have evidence for the nonsense in the bible, bring it.
@@walkergarya fufilled prophecies, resurrection of Christ,miracles in the name of Jesus, conscientific reflection.
Other than Paul who NEVER saw a physical Jesus,
1. The names of the gospels are assigned to them at a much later time.
2. These gospels have NO KNOWN named authors.
3. These gospels were written decades after the events.
4. NOWHERE in any of Mark, Luke or Mathew is there any note of "I saw this".
5. The gospels are mutually contradictory.
6. The gospels have been added to over time.
7. The gospels are contradicted by Roman and Jewish practices of that time.
8. Events like the "Star of Bethlehem, the Earthquake when Jesus "died", the mid afternoon darkness, the dead of Jeruselem rising from their graves are NOT supported by any other record.
I have studied the known historical facts and your Jesus fairy tale is NOT THERE.
It’s funny, even if the gospels said “I saw this” you still won’t believe it
@@jamesdeburiet3919 Frankly, why should I believe the fairy tales in your bible and not the fairy tales from any other religion?
@@walkergarya because we have evidence for Christianity
@@jamesdeburiet3919 No you do not. Saying you have evidence, testable evidence and having that evidence are two very different things.
@@walkergarya well, we’ve got documents of the non biblical writers that wrote about Jesus and the early Christian’s
Sorry but all you have are a lot of claims about Jesus but there is NO evidence to show these are more than just claims. You have dogma, not evidence.