I love how the interviewer translates the questions but not the answers. Being left in the dark is so much fun. I'm about to go watch Narcos without subtitles.
11 YEARS UNDEFEATED CHAMPION IN 147 pounds WBC- IBF. 154 WBA-IBF and 160 pounds WBA 147 pounds 7 years 16 defenses 13 KO Record 40 - 0 -33 KO 1990- 2001 undefeated TRINIDAD IN 147 WIN MAYWEATHER .
I go with Felix because he made every punch count and he conserves his energy and stays in the middle of the ring and keeps the pressure on. Tito would've destroyed Pac man because he loves to come forward as far as Floyd it would take a little longer since Floyd foot work is so great but a couple of left hooks to the body would eventually slow him down and Floyd would have to fight toe to toe..Floyd has a lot of heart ..who knows?
@@carlos1velasquez its simple, Prime Pac (09 Cotto fight) vs Prime Tito (99 Pernell/DLH) would be all about speed, condition, resistance, size and power. Both Peak and Excel in each category except the size advantage from Tito .. Manny never fought full 147lber till he fought Floyd and Thurman so could be the difference for Tito to win ... As for Mayweather peak (10 Mosley - 14 Maidana) at 147 .. he gets shredded by Tito's punch output and would lose to Prime Tito via decision.
ObieG93 there middleweights Floyd's a natural lightweight tf u expect he always fighting guys 20 pounds bigger than him come fight night but really don't matter Floyd could outbox him and not get tired like Oscar did
Tito was a great fighter but he had problems when ever he got in with pure boxers. He had problems with Oscar and hopkins he would have had those same problems with Mayweather. He was also out boxed by winky wright.
Im puertorican and I love Tito, but he wouldve lost against Mayweather, however Tito would be one of the few fighters that wouldve given Floyd a hell of a fight.
+Sportsfanatic10 1 - Floyd didn't struggle with Maidana. An opponent having an awkward style and who is willing to hit low, knee and clinch and hit is going to pose a problem for anyone if they don't catch him clean to stop him. 2 - DelaHoya came in at least 168lbs. Floyd was maybe 149-151. Anyone you name who has fought with such a weight disparity has lost. So your point here is moot as well. 3 - Mayweather did not lose to Castillo. It was a very close fight but you attempt to downplay the fact that Castillo was the greatest lightweight champion of his era so it seems as though Mayweather should have breezed through him and didn't. 4A - Hearns was a dynamite puncher who was often thwarted by great boxers. Out of the other three men in the Fabulous Four, Hearns only ever beat one. 4B - Leonard was a great boxer/puncher. Though Leonard could be beaten when he faced someone who could box equally as well or better as seen with Duran. Mayweather is a much better boxer than Leonard. 4C - Hagler was a middleweight who predicated his legacy on fights against men who were significantly smaller than himself. Hagler could have moved up and actually taken chances, but he was content to fight men 2-4 divisions smaller than himself. Hagler wasn't some boxing dynamo. He was a gatekeeper to his division who prevented better talented albeit smaller men from rising up and planting a flag at 160lbs. Don't get me wrong. He had some great fights and they were brutal, but that's hardly the measure of how great he actually was. Hagler, like many boxers who are hailed as all time greats, was very content to languish in one division and never take chances against men who might have beaten him. Had Hagler gone up a division and tested his mettle there, he could have at least said that he did move outside of his comfort zone. Learn more about boxing and stop watching videos that glorify the "good ole days". That's more about nostalgia than it is about any real comparison as to who was more skilled and who accomplished more.
***** One could argue that Manny Pacquiao also defeated DelaHoya and Cotto more impressively than Mayweather. And that would be because they don't have the brain power to factor in that both DelaHoya and Cotto were stipulated to make weights that they couldn't perform optimally at against Pacquiao. DelaHoya was used to competing at 168lbs but weighed in at 145lbs. Cotto usually rehydrated up to 150+ but was made to come in at 145lbs as well. The very same applies to Maidana except Maidana wasn't stipulated to cut weight. Maidana didn't like his chances at 147. So he tried his hand at 140. Maidana since coming up to 147lbs has defeated Broner and gave Mayweather a hell of an awkward fight. In the rematch Mayweather decided not to let Maidana use his bump and unbalance tactics and just boxed him and moved. Its not because his technical skills improved. Its because he was bigger, stronger and could maintain his stamina and endurance longer because he wasn't drained the way he was making the smaller weight, Maidana has said as much himself. Perhaps this is all a bit too technical for you though.
Trinidad would have beaten Mayweather, cause Mayweather doesn't throw a lot of punches, he is more of a counter puncher with no power punch. A prime Trinidad was too much to deal with at welterweight, you guys have to remember Oscar was good fast offensive fighter, Hopkins was a very strong light heavyweight puncher.
Mayweather isn't a huge volume puncher but he does throw plenty. Fighters don't walk through him do they? Sometimes he doesn't even have to because he'll jab to the body or faint or change his stance or whatever. Making his opponent second guess. Floyd was just better.
@@edgardorivera-jr5bi That ability to knock someone out is not the same as knocking someone out. Canelo had power too, Cotto, Ortiz, Maidana, all had power. Diego Corrales had power.
@jackjack4196 Trinidad and Aaron Pryor's relentless aggression would've given him problems. Hearns used his height and reach very well and it made him hard to counter.
Trinidad at 147 and 154 was unbeatable. Look at his record in championship fights plus look at the competition he fought at those weights. Tito wasn’t the same fighter at 160.
Mmmm he was fed my favorite fighter and I loved em but nah a championship quality boxer would’ve had his number like de la Hoya showed but his fault Was he didn’t finish like a champ he ran which led to his loss
I think Tito is punch drunk. I did like him when he fought. He was exciting and brave. But clearly Mayweather would be a nightmare for Tito. If he had problems with boxers like de la hoya, winky, and Jones . What do you think the outcome would have been with Floyd.
Not taking anything from mayweather tito was a big scary welterweight back in the day. We don't know because they never fought. Also oscar was better boxerpuncher when he fought tito . he was much more hunger at that time Then when mayweather fought him
Jorge lopez I don't about that. The least three rounds Oscar ran and never got hit.. In some fights Floyd runs in the last few round and doesn't get hit.
Not so my friend. Tito has the power to do the damage and applied pressure when needed. Oscar was hurt by Tito in that fight. So Mayweather would not have won that fight.
Trinidad should have stayed at 147 and stayed in the welterweight division. I respect him for trying to move up to fight jones jr and Hopkins but he wasn’t the same fighter.
I’m sure there’s a version of Tito that could have beaten “pretty boy.” But, he doesn’t beat “Money,” aka, a more mature Mayweather. Tito had issues with highly defensive boxers later in his career.
Trinidad had problems with boxers (De La Hoya and Hopkins). Mayweather was an even better boxer than DLH and Hopkins. Trinidad never would have been able to hit Mayweather.
Every boxer should feel that they have a chance...Yes, Chance...but that's all...talking like it would of been a matter of fact is something different..especially, if a boxer has taken a loss before...Stop it already Tito...
tito is good and had the potential physically to be a great but mentally very weak, mayweather would have frustrated him and made him think twice before throwing because of the countering... physically tito matches up well but mentally this is a huge mismatch
I guess you haven"t watched the fight Trinidad vs pernell Whittaker. Same style of mayweather . Before you say something , first watch that youtube video of the fight Trinidad vs pernell.
@@danielalfonsocedenocontrer6386 Pernell was done at that point in his career and really wasn't nearly as sharp as Mayweather was, he was flashier but fundamentally Floyd is better and far more disciplined.
I am Puerto Rican. Tito is the first fighter I ever heard of, but Mayweather is better. He would have been schooled pretty badly. People always over glorify fighters of the past or the ones they find entertaining.
Believe it or not tito wiuld have gave floyed alot of trouble maybe even beat floyed floyed was an old welterweight so skillful he happened to be good past his prime tito was a freight train at welter and was not detered even if behind fought harder. Take nothing from Mayweather but Tito I give him the odds. Delahoya did not straight run the last 3 rounds for nothing! Tito was very consistent with his attack even when behind or in trouble and trust me tito definitely hit hard enough to hurt floyed. And was consistent enough to land punches split fight toss up but odds are in titos favor but pound per pound floyed
@@keithbrown3889 SRL would beat Trinidad, SRL was more natural at 147 than Mayweather, SRL boxing skills, speed and punching power would made it a battle but I think SRL conditioning would be the difference, remember he fought when it were 15 rds
Trinidad shoulda stayed at 147 couldve even pulled a Canelo and added another 10 years to his career by fighting welters and middles at a catch weight (154). No way he would’ve lost to Winky Wright at 154. Never should’ve took the Hopkins fight… Floyd should’ve had to knock off him and Oscar to get the crown but Don King ruined Tito for $$$
Just like a Puerto Rican,....can't speak a lick of English except when it's 'threatening' someone, LOL!! All joking aside Marcos, nice interview. This is a nice format for you, speaking to the Spanish speaking guys in Spanish.
WITHAKER was most defensive of Mayweather and trinidad won withaker ,I don't know if trinidad ko Mayweather but I'm sure trinidad won for desicion or ko
***** He had trouble with Jose Luis Castillo who has a very similar style to Chavez, but much slower. Even Roger Mayweather believes that in his prime, he would of given Mayweather a run for his money. But we all know that Mayweather doesn't fight great fighters in their prime. He would of waited him out until he looked weak or got KOD like he usually does.
Boxing is all about match ups … probably why this fight never happened … because prime Trinidad at 147 would’ve seriously hurt mayweather the body punching the constant pressure and closing the ring this would’ve been too much to deal with for Floyd and I love Floyd forsure but this was a fight he would’ve loss
sad how alot off these legends cant let Floyd live.... Felix you're my fav you'd be Taylor made for Floyd.... had a left hook ever landed on Floyd ever? lol
+TCthaCrisis Yes, it has. Ever seen his fight with Chop Chop Corley? Lots of them landed, and in the same round. Felix thinks his style could beat everybody. He said the same shit against De La Hoya(who gave that fight away by running the last few rounds), and said the same shit against old man Hopkins(which he lost embarassingly). Felix gonna Felix.
+TCthaCrisis Not only did tito also had a good straight right, but he was also a HUGE welterweight. Tito wont get intimidated like canelito did. If 50 year old mosley had floyd dancing, a prime tito smokes him.
Not the same he was old when tito retired. But it if was in he's 20 . I think your mayweather . If they fought each other your mayweather would lost . Tito in he"s prime was a beast . Puncher boxer. Fast. Movement . Firepower in both hands . This guy did not knock you out with one punch. He knock out others with patience. Several punches . Watch youtube on him. I watched he"s fights live tv. In the 1990"s.
TITO IN HIS PRIME WILL NEVER BEAT FLOYD MAYWEATHER.....FLOYD DEFENSE IS TO MUCH AND HE SMART FIGHTER.....TITO HE WAS A BEAST AND POWER PUNCHER BUT THAT WONT BE ENOUGH TO BEAT FLOYD
Gayweather is just an overrated bill board thats just about money and publicity people want to see a fight not a marathon this guy should stick to marathons but anyways this bum is lucky he didn't face Chavez Sr or Trinidad because they would cut the ring and would've unleash hell and demolish him but unlike gayweather he would've duck these guys just like he chooses his old and washed up opponents oh I forgot about his fake undefeated record this guy has already has 2 losses 1 with de la hoya on point and the 2 nd clearly he really lost with Jose Luis Castillo 2 just watch d fight and you can who really lost
Trinidad is only saying that because of his fight with Sweet Pea when he was on drugs and struggling in his career.Sweet Pea is no Mayweather. Sweet Pea was an amazing defensive fighter, but he couldn't find openings like Floyd can. Not even close. Also, Sweet Pea's defense didn't put him into position to counter as often or as frequently as Mayweather's does.I liked Trinidad, but he was greatly overrated.IMHO, he was losing to Vargas and had to get dirty by hitting him low to stay in the fight.
Greg K I am not stupid. And that's why I am able to make such comparisons. Sweet Pea was very entertaining to watch but his style was very different than Mayweather's own. Mayweather has MUCH better offense which is why his defense was superior. What Sweet Pea did was he moved, ducked and dodged punches. Mayweather actually slips punches and is able to counter off of his defensive movements. Sweet Pea was defensive in the way Willie Pep was. Mayweather is defensive much in the way James Toney was. You can feel how you like. Just don't confuse yourself into believing what you feel carries any weight.
J Smith I will make this short. Look at top defensive boxers of all time. Most readings show pernell whitaker as superior. Slipping is dodging and he dodges way better than mayweather. Mayweather watched sweat pea to become a defensive boxer. Sweat pea had way better opponents. I could go on, but this isn't even an argument.
Greg K In what way is Whitaker superior? Mayweather's accuracy(connect percentage) is superior. Mayweather's plus/minus ratio is superior. Mayweather's KO ratio is higher. Mayweather's has beaten more world champions. Mayweather has been world champion in more divisions. In what way was Whitaker "superior" to Mayweather? Make it as short or as long as you like. If you can substantiate what your saying, its all bullshit opinion based on your own opinion. Whitaker, for all his slipping and dodging, has been hit a lot harder than Mayweather. Whitaker didn't have the longevity that Mayweather has. Whitaker has been put on his ass multiple times. Is that the superior defense you're speaking about? You say you could go on .. and you should have .. because so far, you haven't written a thing that makes you appear as though you even watch boxing aside from mentioning names. Sorry guy .. but you're not bullshitting your way through this discussion. Whitaker was an amazing fighter who in his time was one of the greatest defensive fighters of that era. James Toney was up their with him though. But you refuse to factor in that the real way to prove how well someone can use defense to impose their offense is to fight bigger men. Whitaker went through 3 divisions and got floored and defeated with his brand of defense. But we all must remember that we never got to see Whitaker's very best as cocaine affected his life and career. Great boxer, but don't deify him. Especially when Mayweather has surpassed him in just about every facet of the game.
Greg K Hehehe .. yet another simple minded moron who wants to win an argument without knowing anything. Your insecurity is glaringly obvious. You read questions that you had no answer for and so you start shucking and jiving when its time to talk like men. Your response had NOTHING to do with boxing whatsoever. You are beneath me and as such I won't be bothered with your childish nonsense any longer.
Mayweather stood far from this man when tito was around if it would have been tito not mosley that night good night night mayweather but abcourse he would of waited till he got old called him out for his gloves and waited for year's till he lossed to benard winky and lastly roy jones 😂 but it's business mayweather deserves his credit... It's the only way he wins I can't believe there wasn't another guy that would use the same techniques on him fight just like he does same style copy copy copycat... Nobody has to follow him in the ring let him chase you or hug and fight the whole fight fustrate him until he makes mistake.. bank it😂
Why he even ask him that man , dam am tired of everyone saying Money may not TBE , but u ask hallfamers could u beat him , I mean wtf , much respect to this guy but he prolly couldn't beat manny . I think the only person who could give Floyd problems would've been pernell Whitaker but different eras what can u say . On a side note u even got Ufc fighters acted like Floyd, I heard Think his name Conner MacGregor saying am the cash cow u made the most when u fought me I helped u out I but money in your pocket I mean line for line , fucking utterly disgusting that that they don't give Floyd the credit for opening doors for fighters, and being a fighter himself, 48-0 in a fist fight is fucking hard to do I don't care who u is ,
Tito nuca le ganaría floyd fue con bernard hopkins winky wright y no pudo con su defensa va poder con floyd 4 boxiadore que le Isidro pelea fueron castillo cotto maidana y de la hoya
Yeah sure . Mayweather picks fights . He fights nobody's old boxers kn retirement or boxers with no records . Boxers in the 1980 and 1990's. Fought other boxers in their prime too. Like mike Tyson. When he fought Larry holmes . Sugar ray vs roberto Duran. Does boxers fought each other in their prime. Trinidad fought others in their prime just like him. Vargas, oba carr, and other fighters like pernell Whittaker that had the same style as your Mayweather. And also Trinidad did not pick his fights . Like mike tyson or roberto Duran. Your Mayweather fight boxers that are in retirement or beginners . With no records or nobody's. And you know is true . Also trinidad did not make a fool out himself fighting McGregor. An mma fighter . Trinidad did not make fool of himself
Well tell that to pernell Whittaker when pernell fought trinidad . Pernell had the same style as mayweather . Watch the fight my friend . First learn then talk .
@@danielalfonsocedenocontrer6386 Pernell Whitaker did not have the same style as Mayweather. They didn't fight the same, and Mayweather was better than Whitaker, and wasn't Whitaker pretty much retired already?
as the old saying go's...…...styles make fight...…..Mayweather would have out-boxed, an outclassed tito...……. no way tito would catch up to him and land knock out punch, Mayweather too fast, too smart, too much ring savy for tito to do much if any damage.... Mayweather would have won by unanimous decision...….
I love how the interviewer translates the questions but not the answers. Being left in the dark is so much fun. I'm about to go watch Narcos without subtitles.
answers are in the transcripts.
11 YEARS UNDEFEATED CHAMPION IN
147 pounds WBC- IBF. 154 WBA-IBF
and 160 pounds WBA
147 pounds 7 years 16 defenses 13 KO
Record 40 - 0 -33 KO
1990- 2001 undefeated
TRINIDAD IN 147 WIN MAYWEATHER
.
This comment should be pinned #Facts
LONG LIVE TITO TRINIDAD, BEST LEFT PUNCHES EVER!
he not dead tf😂
Facts
Trinidad was a beast in his prime. That hard left hooks...
No question tito would have knock him out, chickens can only run so much until u get caught.
Wow Felix Tito Trinidad vs Floyd Mayweather in their primes. What a battle that would've been.
I go with Felix because he made every punch count and he conserves his energy and stays in the middle of the ring and keeps the pressure on. Tito would've destroyed Pac man because he loves to come forward as far as Floyd it would take a little longer since Floyd foot work is so great but a couple of left hooks to the body would eventually slow him down and Floyd would have to fight toe to toe..Floyd has a lot of heart ..who knows?
Idk Pacquiao would probably be too fast and busy Floyd would be too smart and elusive
@@carlos1velasquez its simple, Prime Pac (09 Cotto fight) vs Prime Tito (99 Pernell/DLH) would be all about speed, condition, resistance, size and power. Both Peak and Excel in each category except the size advantage from Tito .. Manny never fought full 147lber till he fought Floyd and Thurman so could be the difference for Tito to win ...
As for Mayweather peak (10 Mosley - 14 Maidana) at 147 .. he gets shredded by Tito's punch output and would lose to Prime Tito via decision.
i cant even imagine the running mayweather would do against this guy lol
Tito is a classic legend
If Maidana Who's A Bum Won A lot Of Rounds Over Mayweather, Trinidad Would Definitely Beat Mayweather
floyd would have waited for tito to get old or just ducked him, like he's done with anyone with power and speed.
maidana ain't no bum you dumb ass and de LA hoya boxed circles around him Floyd would easily just like Bernard did and Roy Jones
+Donovan Hunt At least Hopkins and Jones have power to knock down and knock out Tito
ObieG93 there middleweights Floyd's a natural lightweight tf u expect he always fighting guys 20 pounds bigger than him come fight night but really don't matter Floyd could outbox him and not get tired like Oscar did
Donovan Hunt
Floyd don't get tire because he runs more than box.
De La Hoya boxed circles around him and DLH isn't as slick a boxer as Floyd
Saved me a post.
When fighters do that , do u think it's disrespectful
Joe V When fighters do what?
David Fischer "Nope Felix clearly won that fight"
Felix didn't win a single round in the first half of the fight except possibly the first
Absolutely right my friend! De La Hoya won that fight hands down!
It woulda been the same fight you had with Oscar except Floyd wouldn't get tired.
True but floyd throw less than oscar...oscar is more ofensive boxer
Meaweather would run for his life if he had face a prime tito
TITO! TITO! TITO!
Tito was a great fighter but he had problems when ever he got in with pure boxers. He had problems with Oscar and hopkins he would have had those same problems with Mayweather. He was also out boxed by winky wright.
Floyd would probably make Tito look silly need more than a left hook to beat Floyd
Que suerte tuvo Mayweather que no chocó con Tito Trinidad
TITO nunca le ganaria a FLOYD en su tiempo
the best fighter felix tito a good guy and humble
Im puertorican and I love Tito, but he wouldve lost against Mayweather, however Tito would be one of the few fighters that wouldve given Floyd a hell of a fight.
Chelo Figueroa floy nomás corre y abraza,grandicimo bestia Tito noquea,aese prieto el primer round...baboso
Tito recarga rápido No creo..
Troll
😂😂😂😂 in 147 Tito would kill anyone
That's right , Tito The Best
Everybody and their mother can apparently beat Mayweather.
Yeah right he struggled with boxers. Floyld would have made him look like a c fighter!!!! I take prime floyld over any weather weight in all era.
+Sportsfanatic10 I think they were all middleweights mayweather is welterweight
Nobody in history beats Floyd at 147
+Sportsfanatic10 1 - Floyd didn't struggle with Maidana. An opponent having an awkward style and who is willing to hit low, knee and clinch and hit is going to pose a problem for anyone if they don't catch him clean to stop him.
2 - DelaHoya came in at least 168lbs. Floyd was maybe 149-151. Anyone you name who has fought with such a weight disparity has lost. So your point here is moot as well.
3 - Mayweather did not lose to Castillo. It was a very close fight but you attempt to downplay the fact that Castillo was the greatest lightweight champion of his era so it seems as though Mayweather should have breezed through him and didn't.
4A - Hearns was a dynamite puncher who was often thwarted by great boxers. Out of the other three men in the Fabulous Four, Hearns only ever beat one.
4B - Leonard was a great boxer/puncher. Though Leonard could be beaten when he faced someone who could box equally as well or better as seen with Duran. Mayweather is a much better boxer than Leonard.
4C - Hagler was a middleweight who predicated his legacy on fights against men who were significantly smaller than himself. Hagler could have moved up and actually taken chances, but he was content to fight men 2-4 divisions smaller than himself. Hagler wasn't some boxing dynamo. He was a gatekeeper to his division who prevented better talented albeit smaller men from rising up and planting a flag at 160lbs.
Don't get me wrong. He had some great fights and they were brutal, but that's hardly the measure of how great he actually was. Hagler, like many boxers who are hailed as all time greats, was very content to languish in one division and never take chances against men who might have beaten him. Had Hagler gone up a division and tested his mettle there, he could have at least said that he did move outside of his comfort zone.
Learn more about boxing and stop watching videos that glorify the "good ole days". That's more about nostalgia than it is about any real comparison as to who was more skilled and who accomplished more.
Even Paulie said Floyd can't beat hearns, he's more skilled but hearns cud keep it easy and slap him with jabs for the whole distance
***** One could argue that Manny Pacquiao also defeated DelaHoya and Cotto more impressively than Mayweather.
And that would be because they don't have the brain power to factor in that both DelaHoya and Cotto were stipulated to make weights that they couldn't perform optimally at against Pacquiao.
DelaHoya was used to competing at 168lbs but weighed in at 145lbs.
Cotto usually rehydrated up to 150+ but was made to come in at 145lbs as well.
The very same applies to Maidana except Maidana wasn't stipulated to cut weight.
Maidana didn't like his chances at 147. So he tried his hand at 140.
Maidana since coming up to 147lbs has defeated Broner and gave Mayweather a hell of an awkward fight. In the rematch Mayweather decided not to let Maidana use his bump and unbalance tactics and just boxed him and moved.
Its not because his technical skills improved.
Its because he was bigger, stronger and could maintain his stamina and endurance longer because he wasn't drained the way he was making the smaller weight,
Maidana has said as much himself.
Perhaps this is all a bit too technical for you though.
No.. Mayweather would've took his hook away.. Like Hopkins did.
Another idiot . Just watch the videos of he"s fights trinidad . Than make your opinion .
I think trinidad would knock out Mayweather. No problem
Tito is not in the same league as floyd
TITO EL Mejol Mi Hermano🇵🇷💎☝️🙏🏾👍🏾
Titoooooo
Trinidad would have beaten Mayweather, cause Mayweather doesn't throw a lot of punches, he is more of a counter puncher with no power punch. A prime Trinidad was too much to deal with at welterweight, you guys have to remember Oscar was good fast offensive fighter, Hopkins was a very strong light heavyweight puncher.
Mayweather isn't a huge volume puncher but he does throw plenty. Fighters don't walk through him do they? Sometimes he doesn't even have to because he'll jab to the body or faint or change his stance or whatever. Making his opponent second guess. Floyd was just better.
@@ericksantos4555
Tiro can ko Floyd because hes a big 147-54 and got power.
50% Mayweather get a decision
@@edgardorivera-jr5bi That ability to knock someone out is not the same as knocking someone out. Canelo had power too, Cotto, Ortiz, Maidana, all had power. Diego Corrales had power.
I think Tommy Hearns and Felix Trinidad would've given Mayweather the most problems. I have to mention Aaron Pryor as well.
@jackjack4196
Trinidad and Aaron Pryor's relentless aggression would've given him problems. Hearns used his height and reach very well and it made him hard to counter.
Trinidad at 147 and 154 was unbeatable. Look at his record in championship fights plus look at the competition he fought at those weights. Tito wasn’t the same fighter at 160.
Give this sports reporter a raise!$ The interviewer and translator.
greatest welterweight since sugar ray Leonard
BlackSeeza how can u say that Oscar whipped him for 9 rounds Oscar and tito
Oscar ran like a coward
R. A. Oscar beat him there is no running in boxing do you dumb fucking casuals ever shut the hell up seriously Tito lost that fight and got out boxed
Mmmm he was fed my favorite fighter and I loved em but nah a championship quality boxer would’ve had his number like de la Hoya showed but his fault
Was he didn’t finish like a champ he ran which led to his loss
Hopkins and Jones jr even showed it later
I think Tito is punch drunk. I did like him when he fought. He was exciting and brave. But clearly Mayweather would be a nightmare for Tito. If he had problems with boxers like de la hoya, winky, and Jones . What do you think the outcome would have been with Floyd.
Not taking anything from mayweather tito was a big scary welterweight back in the day. We don't know because they never fought. Also oscar was better boxerpuncher when he fought tito . he was much more hunger at that time
Then when mayweather fought him
De La Hoya looked like he juiced for Tito fight, something just looked off/unnatrual about his body for that fight.
Tito uno grande en su momento
Tito's lost his fking mind.
floyd wouldve taken him to school. i dont even like Floyd lol
+Jorge lopez School or a marathon?
wouldve done what de la hoya did except not give away the last 3 rounds. Box and move
Jorge lopez
I don't about that. The least three rounds Oscar ran and never got hit.. In some fights Floyd runs in the last few round and doesn't get hit.
Not so my friend. Tito has the power to do the damage and applied pressure when needed. Oscar was hurt by Tito in that fight. So Mayweather would not have won that fight.
No trinidad was a fast puncher. He fought pernell ,and beat him same style as Mayweather. Trinidad to much of a puncher.
I love trini but I don't think hee could've beet Mayweather. He had problems with winky wright.
Trinidad should have stayed at 147 and stayed in the welterweight division. I respect him for trying to move up to fight jones jr and Hopkins but he wasn’t the same fighter.
tito by ko
you're funny lol
I’m sure there’s a version of Tito that could have beaten “pretty boy.” But, he doesn’t beat “Money,” aka, a more mature Mayweather. Tito had issues with highly defensive boxers later in his career.
Tito would have smashed his head so bad that Floyd would have been forced to quit boxing lol
They all say what they would have done to Floyd until they get in the ring with him. Talk is cheap.
why did they cut it short.. Sugar wasn't finished.. what he was about to say sounded real..
Trinidad wouldve got his ass whooped... he lost to bernard because he couldn't "box". Floyd would have outclassed em
The only boxer that would’ve beaten pretty boi in their prime is Barrera just like he beat prince.
LET'S GO CHAMP!
Trinidad had problems with boxers (De La Hoya and Hopkins). Mayweather was an even better boxer than DLH and Hopkins. Trinidad never would have been able to hit Mayweather.
Every boxer should feel that they have a chance...Yes, Chance...but that's all...talking like it would of been a matter of fact is something different..especially, if a boxer has taken a loss before...Stop it already Tito...
tito is good and had the potential physically to be a great but mentally very weak, mayweather would have frustrated him and made him think twice before throwing because of the countering... physically tito matches up well but mentally this is a huge mismatch
I guess you haven"t watched the fight Trinidad vs pernell Whittaker. Same style of mayweather . Before you say something , first watch that youtube video of the fight Trinidad vs pernell.
bsstyle123
What kind of bs are you selling?? Mentally weak!!! You don’t get to be the kind of champion Trinidad was by being weak.
@@danielalfonsocedenocontrer6386 Pernell was done at that point in his career and really wasn't nearly as sharp as Mayweather was, he was flashier but fundamentally Floyd is better and far more disciplined.
Tito would've destroyed Mayweathers body
De cupey alto Puerto Rico Félix Tito trinidad 🇵🇷🇵🇷
He couldn't even beat Hopkins and Hopkins is as defensive as Floyd is.
I am Puerto Rican. Tito is the first fighter I ever heard of, but Mayweather is better. He would have been schooled pretty badly. People always over glorify fighters of the past or the ones they find entertaining.
LOOKING NICE TITO, I LOVE YOU!
Oscar fought Tito in his Prime ! Oscar fought Floyd a bit past his Prime ! and Oscar won 5 rounds in that fight ! go figure !
Floyd wasn’t past his prime dumb ass floyd was still in his prime even in 2011 he was his last prime fight was vs Cotto
Oscar actually beat Trinidad the judges gave the fight because Oscar “ran” the last theee rounds even though he still landed the better punches
Believe it or not tito wiuld have gave floyed alot of trouble maybe even beat floyed floyed was an old welterweight so skillful he happened to be good past his prime tito was a freight train at welter and was not detered even if behind fought harder. Take nothing from Mayweather but Tito I give him the odds. Delahoya did not straight run the last 3 rounds for nothing! Tito was very consistent with his attack even when behind or in trouble and trust me tito definitely hit hard enough to hurt floyed. And was consistent enough to land punches split fight toss up but odds are in titos favor but pound per pound floyed
Could Tito have beaten SRL?
@@keithbrown3889 SRL would beat Trinidad, SRL was more natural at 147 than Mayweather, SRL boxing skills, speed and punching power would made it a battle but I think SRL conditioning would be the difference, remember he fought when it were 15 rds
@@cesareantonio6013 I think you're right.
Trinidad shoulda stayed at 147 couldve even pulled a Canelo and added another 10 years to his career by fighting welters and middles at a catch weight (154). No way he would’ve lost to Winky Wright at 154. Never should’ve took the Hopkins fight… Floyd should’ve had to knock off him and Oscar to get the crown but Don King ruined Tito for $$$
what does "would of beaten" mean?
Just like a Puerto Rican,....can't speak a lick of English except when it's 'threatening' someone, LOL!! All joking aside Marcos, nice interview. This is a nice format for you, speaking to the Spanish speaking guys in Spanish.
WITHAKER was most defensive of Mayweather and trinidad won withaker ,I don't know if trinidad ko Mayweather but I'm sure trinidad won for desicion or ko
Duran, Leonard, Hearns, Chavez and a young Mosley would of beaten Mayweather, but not Tito. He is very flat footed.
***** He had trouble with Jose Luis Castillo who has a very similar style to Chavez, but much slower. Even Roger Mayweather believes that in his prime, he would of given Mayweather a run for his money. But we all know that Mayweather doesn't fight great fighters in their prime. He would of waited him out until he looked weak or got KOD like he usually does.
Boxing is all about match ups … probably why this fight never happened … because prime Trinidad at 147 would’ve seriously hurt mayweather the body punching the constant pressure and closing the ring this would’ve been too much to deal with for Floyd and I love Floyd forsure but this was a fight he would’ve loss
Did he mention to have his dad wrap your hands?
sad how alot off these legends cant let Floyd live.... Felix you're my fav you'd be Taylor made for Floyd.... had a left hook ever landed on Floyd ever? lol
+TCthaCrisis Yes, it has. Ever seen his fight with Chop Chop Corley? Lots of them landed, and in the same round.
Felix thinks his style could beat everybody. He said the same shit against De La Hoya(who gave that fight away by running the last few rounds), and said the same shit against old man Hopkins(which he lost embarassingly).
Felix gonna Felix.
+TCthaCrisis Not only did tito also had a good straight right, but he was also a HUGE welterweight. Tito wont get intimidated like canelito did. If 50 year old mosley had floyd dancing, a prime tito smokes him.
+$I.Need.Money$ uhhh no
@@michaelosborne8947 old man hopkins went on to beat like 10 more champs for 10 more years
Argentina 🇦🇷
WELL MAYBE TITO SHOULD HAVE CAME OUT OF RETIREMENT AFTER FLOYD BEAT OSCAR.
Not the same he was old when tito retired. But it if was in he's 20 . I think your mayweather . If they fought each other your mayweather would lost . Tito in he"s prime was a beast . Puncher boxer. Fast. Movement . Firepower in both hands . This guy did not knock you out with one punch. He knock out others with patience. Several punches . Watch youtube on him. I watched he"s fights live tv. In the 1990"s.
Tito hit like a mule, Floyd would’ve been stopped
Tito Trinidad the best
No way he could solve the mayweather puzzle. He couldn't solve bhop lol
these guys would have lost if they are fighting at the age of 39
Everyone knows Maidana won the 1st fight, if you say otherwise you are a Flomo ball you know what.
TITO IN HIS PRIME WILL NEVER BEAT FLOYD MAYWEATHER.....FLOYD DEFENSE IS TO MUCH AND HE SMART FIGHTER.....TITO HE WAS A BEAST AND POWER PUNCHER BUT THAT WONT BE ENOUGH TO BEAT FLOYD
Brush up on your Spanish, dude! Not bad. I thought you didn't speak it.
Good interview. Keep it up!
why it even matter tho they never gone fight
Si TITO PUEDE LASTIMAR A FLOY PORQUE TITO ES UN 147-54 GRANDE
from what i remember, he was slow. fmw pot shot heaven, just a big punching version and more stiff version of cotto.
Facts only casuals say Tito would win
Absolutely not..he didn't ko Benard Hopkins
Bernard Hopkins Was Middleweight & Hopkins Was In His Prime. At Welterweight Nobody Beat Trinidad
Haters Have Opinion I don't think he was in his prime
Por eso Cotto le ganó, 12 asaltos ofensivo y dando golpes agresivos y haciendo puntos. Tito lo hubiera nockeado
Gayweather is just an overrated bill board thats just about money and publicity people want to see a fight not a marathon this guy should stick to marathons but anyways this bum is lucky he didn't face Chavez Sr or Trinidad because they would cut the ring and would've unleash hell and demolish him but unlike gayweather he would've duck these guys just like he chooses his old and washed up opponents oh I forgot about his fake undefeated record this guy has already has 2 losses 1 with de la hoya on point and the 2 nd clearly he really lost with Jose Luis Castillo 2 just watch d fight and you can who really lost
He took out sweet pea
This guy's never learned English in all these years
trinidad gets his ass whipped by mayweather idk if he knocks out tito but mayweather beats him tito can't fight backwards at all bad feet work
Trinidad is only saying that because of his fight with Sweet Pea when he was on drugs and struggling in his career.Sweet Pea is no Mayweather. Sweet Pea was an amazing defensive fighter, but he couldn't find openings like Floyd can. Not even close. Also, Sweet Pea's defense didn't put him into position to counter as often or as frequently as Mayweather's does.I liked Trinidad, but he was greatly overrated.IMHO, he was losing to Vargas and had to get dirty by hitting him low to stay in the fight.
Are you that stupid? Never compare sweatpea with mayweather if you know boxing.
Greg K I am not stupid.
And that's why I am able to make such comparisons.
Sweet Pea was very entertaining to watch but his style was very different than Mayweather's own.
Mayweather has MUCH better offense which is why his defense was superior.
What Sweet Pea did was he moved, ducked and dodged punches.
Mayweather actually slips punches and is able to counter off of his defensive movements.
Sweet Pea was defensive in the way Willie Pep was.
Mayweather is defensive much in the way James Toney was.
You can feel how you like. Just don't confuse yourself into believing what you feel carries any weight.
J Smith I will make this short. Look at top defensive boxers of all time. Most readings show pernell whitaker as superior. Slipping is dodging and he dodges way better than mayweather. Mayweather watched sweat pea to become a defensive boxer. Sweat pea had way better opponents. I could go on, but this isn't even an argument.
Greg K In what way is Whitaker superior?
Mayweather's accuracy(connect percentage) is superior.
Mayweather's plus/minus ratio is superior.
Mayweather's KO ratio is higher.
Mayweather's has beaten more world champions.
Mayweather has been world champion in more divisions.
In what way was Whitaker "superior" to Mayweather?
Make it as short or as long as you like. If you can substantiate what your saying, its all bullshit opinion based on your own opinion.
Whitaker, for all his slipping and dodging, has been hit a lot harder than Mayweather.
Whitaker didn't have the longevity that Mayweather has.
Whitaker has been put on his ass multiple times.
Is that the superior defense you're speaking about?
You say you could go on .. and you should have .. because so far, you haven't written a thing that makes you appear as though you even watch boxing aside from mentioning names.
Sorry guy .. but you're not bullshitting your way through this discussion.
Whitaker was an amazing fighter who in his time was one of the greatest defensive fighters of that era. James Toney was up their with him though.
But you refuse to factor in that the real way to prove how well someone can use defense to impose their offense is to fight bigger men.
Whitaker went through 3 divisions and got floored and defeated with his brand of defense.
But we all must remember that we never got to see Whitaker's very best as cocaine affected his life and career.
Great boxer, but don't deify him. Especially when Mayweather has surpassed him in just about every facet of the game.
Greg K Hehehe .. yet another simple minded moron who wants to win an argument without knowing anything.
Your insecurity is glaringly obvious.
You read questions that you had no answer for and so you start shucking and jiving when its time to talk like men.
Your response had NOTHING to do with boxing whatsoever.
You are beneath me and as such I won't be bothered with your childish nonsense any longer.
You mean plaster hands style?
Mayweather stood far from this man when tito was around if it would have been tito not mosley that night good night night mayweather but abcourse he would of waited till he got old called him out for his gloves and waited for year's till he lossed to benard winky and lastly roy jones 😂 but it's business mayweather deserves his credit... It's the only way he wins I can't believe there wasn't another guy that would use the same techniques on him fight just like he does same style copy copy copycat... Nobody has to follow him in the ring let him chase you or hug and fight the whole fight fustrate him until he makes mistake.. bank it😂
Why he even ask him that man , dam am tired of everyone saying Money may not TBE , but u ask hallfamers could u beat him , I mean wtf , much respect to this guy but he prolly couldn't beat manny . I think the only person who could give Floyd problems would've been pernell Whitaker but different eras what can u say . On a side note u even got Ufc fighters acted like Floyd, I heard Think his name Conner MacGregor saying am the cash cow u made the most when u fought me I helped u out I but money in your pocket I mean line for line , fucking utterly disgusting that that they don't give Floyd the credit for opening doors for fighters, and being a fighter himself, 48-0 in a fist fight is fucking hard to do I don't care who u is ,
This guy beat pernell whitaker
tito peleo contra hopkins, seguramente le ganaba a floyd por decision
Hay tantos que pudieron vencer a Mayweather, shane Mosley Manny Pacquiao tito Trinidad y Óscar de la hoya en suprime lo revientan a Mayweather
Tito nuca le ganaría floyd fue con bernard hopkins winky wright y no pudo con su defensa va poder con floyd 4 boxiadore que le Isidro pelea fueron castillo cotto maidana y de la hoya
My nigga
Trinidad was overrated. Mayweather would have destroyed him. De La Hoya got robbed when he fought Trinidad.
Yeah sure . Mayweather picks fights . He fights nobody's old boxers kn retirement or boxers with no records . Boxers in the 1980 and 1990's. Fought other boxers in their prime too. Like mike Tyson. When he fought Larry holmes . Sugar ray vs roberto Duran. Does boxers fought each other in their prime. Trinidad fought others in their prime just like him. Vargas, oba carr, and other fighters like pernell Whittaker that had the same style as your Mayweather. And also Trinidad did not pick his fights . Like mike tyson or roberto Duran. Your Mayweather fight boxers that are in retirement or beginners . With no records or nobody's. And you know is true . Also trinidad did not make a fool out himself fighting McGregor. An mma fighter . Trinidad did not make fool of himself
@@danielalfonsocedenocontrer6386 pernell Whitaker was not in his prime when they fought and that’s so obvious when did they fight again? 1999...
Tito would of had no clue what to do in the ring smh
Well tell that to pernell Whittaker when pernell fought trinidad . Pernell had the same style as mayweather . Watch the fight my friend . First learn then talk .
@@danielalfonsocedenocontrer6386 Pernell Whitaker did not have the same style as Mayweather. They didn't fight the same, and Mayweather was better than Whitaker, and wasn't Whitaker pretty much retired already?
Puerta Rico
as the old saying go's...…...styles make fight...…..Mayweather would have out-boxed, an outclassed tito...……. no way tito would catch up to him and land knock out punch, Mayweather too fast, too smart, too much ring savy for tito to do much if any damage.... Mayweather would have won by unanimous decision...….
how about some sub next time
Tito you would not win at all
you got beat down by Sugar Rau
Sub next time
Loaded gloves and cheated against Vargas