18th Century Musket | Old Gun Restoration

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 дек 2024

Комментарии • 91

  • @dukefanshawe6815
    @dukefanshawe6815 Год назад +19

    That is from the 19th century. 1800s. It has a percussion hammer, not a flint lock, which was used during the 18th century 1700s

  • @АлексейОжегов-ь2д
    @АлексейОжегов-ь2д Год назад +1

    Парни БРАВО !
    С юмором, с выдумкой, смотреть совсем не скучно !
    МОЛОДЦЫ !

  • @twp616
    @twp616 Год назад +16

    Mid 19th century percussion lock weapon, 18th century would be a flint lock weapon. Smooth bore would be a musket, a rifled bore would be a rifle.I enjoy your restoration work.

    • @timsparks1858
      @timsparks1858 Год назад

      Good eye! They have a tendency sometimes of incorrect dates and history.

    • @glcart-cs5sc
      @glcart-cs5sc Год назад +1

      musket is a general term for a single loading muzzle loader

    • @aaronsmith4940
      @aaronsmith4940 Год назад

      Wrong I have a percussion gun from the 1870s

    • @timsparks1858
      @timsparks1858 Год назад +1

      @@aaronsmith4940 Percussion Cap weapons came out in the 1830s... .... the 19th Century .

    • @AristonSparta
      @AristonSparta Год назад +1

      @@timsparks1858there are such things as rifle muskets, which this may likely be.

  • @georgeshelton6281
    @georgeshelton6281 Год назад +2

    This is post battle for New Orleans Louisiana days. Also, when Texas first became independent from Mexico in 1836. The pony express took place as well! Don't forget the Monroe doctrine and the Stamp Act. Like all American history books say it, as the restless nation moves westward. 🇲🇽

  • @expeditionsandevents3491
    @expeditionsandevents3491 10 дней назад

    oddly satisfying

  • @theexplorer8774
    @theexplorer8774 Год назад +3

    Why you going so quick and it is not a musket at all

  • @jacobcarbajal7094
    @jacobcarbajal7094 Год назад +17

    That it cannot be considered as a restoration that it's so invasive for a restoration, you ruined that gun

    • @danpatterson6937
      @danpatterson6937 Год назад +4

      Exactly

    • @kevfit4333
      @kevfit4333 Год назад +6

      You should go to a firearms museum if that's your thing bro. There are countless old guns in this condition, millions. He fixed one up and made it useable again. It simply isn't worth some white glove museum grade restoration.

    • @laurentdevaux5617
      @laurentdevaux5617 11 месяцев назад +1

      Who cares, as this gun isn't that old ?

    • @UlissesTeixeira-r1h
      @UlissesTeixeira-r1h 4 месяца назад

      Too bad, I prefer the after RESTORATION that is incredibly made and beautiful.

    • @ENLow-kt7xg
      @ENLow-kt7xg 4 месяца назад +2

      Dude. I don’t know about restoring guns. But what I do know is this guy took a gun that was in poor shape and made it better. Show me all your videos. If you haven’t taken the time, why bother commenting.

  • @aaronsmith4940
    @aaronsmith4940 Год назад +2

    Eeerm, what about the inside if tge barrel?!

  • @njfile
    @njfile Год назад +4

    It would nice to know what chemicals are being used.

    • @snonly
      @snonly 7 месяцев назад

      Alot of these chemicals are toxic and can give someone cancer just touching them with their bare hands.
      Not to mention the acid which is obviously VERY NOT SAFE TO TOUCH😅

    • @snonly
      @snonly 7 месяцев назад

      Therefore, its best to keep the chemicals a secret

  • @AlexanderIsraelsson-v6i
    @AlexanderIsraelsson-v6i 8 месяцев назад

    is he selling the firearms? and if he does it were do you buy em ( a musket fan)

  • @LarryDeSilva64
    @LarryDeSilva64 Год назад +3

    Those are some pretty nice restorations. Thanks for the demonstration.

  • @MASI_forging
    @MASI_forging Год назад +5

    You did a great work dude.

  • @ВладиславХристенко-ж5ъ

    От як у ХVІІІ столітті капсульний мушкет? Може таки XIX століття? 1815 рік?

  • @ice_cream_man842
    @ice_cream_man842 Год назад

    Красивая вещица

  • @dukefanshawe6815
    @dukefanshawe6815 Год назад

    Btw did you get that scraper Idea from Mark Novak?

  • @TheCrimsonFoxx
    @TheCrimsonFoxx Год назад +8

    You're making a lot of mistakes when doing this, the most egregious is filling the wood with a filler, the second is using a cold blue(cold blue is garbage and never holds up, guns like these were typically rust browned), third all of those screwheads are mangled because no one in the life of this musket used hollow ground bits the angled blade of a non hollow ground screwdriver cams out of the screw and wrecks the metal

    • @kevwebb2637
      @kevwebb2637 Год назад +1

      70s replica of a single barrel percussion cap shotgun.

    • @laurentdevaux5617
      @laurentdevaux5617 11 месяцев назад +1

      Anyway, given the shape of the lock, if this gun is really genuine, it can't have been made in the 18th century. At best, it was made in the 1840, at worst...

  • @Doc0652
    @Doc0652 4 месяца назад

    Brilliant Restoration, Well Done

  • @patriotaespana8842
    @patriotaespana8842 Год назад +5

    Magnifico trabajo

  • @austinkoontz2845
    @austinkoontz2845 Год назад

    21:55 finished. 😊

  • @linconclay9778
    @linconclay9778 8 месяцев назад

    But I would like to know where he finds these weapons

  • @jerrymerryweather8034
    @jerrymerryweather8034 Год назад +1

    I prefer the original antique look !

  • @DALWAG
    @DALWAG Год назад +2

    Looks closer to a mid 19th century rifle… that precision cap makes me want to say springfield… correct me if im wrong

    • @danielburgess7785
      @danielburgess7785 Год назад

      Obviously a 19th century piece. Pity our host showed his lack of knowledge in such a blatant manner.

    • @EVIL-SHAGGY666sigma
      @EVIL-SHAGGY666sigma Год назад

      Don't listen to that putrid dinglebottom! but fr it's for sure a mid-19th century "musket" I don't see any rifling, and It aint a Springfield. Springfields are generally large and a bit bulkier, also Springfields have furniture going along the entire barrel, also I want to say it may be British too but how could I know. Also, it may be a cavalry carbine, infantry arms were larger due to the inaccuracy of a smoothbore, still it's more accurate than what is commonly left on. Ither way don't listen to dumb Daniel it's well that you're interested in this stuff.

    • @SStupendous
      @SStupendous Год назад +1

      Very clearly not Springfield, it's backlock for a start

    • @SStupendous
      @SStupendous Год назад

      @@EVIL-SHAGGY666sigma It's a shotgun variant of a french carbine from about 1840-60.

  • @ledart
    @ledart Год назад +2

    good job!

  • @bellakaldera3305
    @bellakaldera3305 Год назад

    This is not a "musket" but instead is a "Fowler", a shotgun...note the front bead and that there is no bayonet lug, also that it is half stocked, not full stocked, nice job though!

  • @itshim_TV
    @itshim_TV Год назад +2

    Big bruh 💯 your the truth will these restorations vids frfr💯💯💯💯 I don't agree with your subscribers I think RUclips cutting your subs about 2.3million subs 💪🏽 I MENIFEST over 3.5Mill✨

  • @austinkoontz2845
    @austinkoontz2845 Год назад

    Cool.

  • @garrisverepji8558
    @garrisverepji8558 Год назад +3

    Вообщето мушкеты не бывают капсульными...Они или фитильные ,в крайнем случае кремнёвые...Это капсульное ружьё конца 18-19 века.Но за работу молодцы ! Отлично...

  • @KOKO-jo6ty
    @KOKO-jo6ty Год назад +8

    destroyed!!!

  • @kellymcgee8456
    @kellymcgee8456 Год назад +1

    This is a "kit" gun from the 1970's. Original barrels were octagon. It is in the style of a Hawkin 54 or 58 caliber, no brass, unadorned metal lock. They did not do Checkering on stocks back then. The weapons were made with great care because lives depended on the weapons function. Entertaining though. a wall hanger

    • @kevwebb2637
      @kevwebb2637 Год назад +1

      Hawkens is not a musket, it had a rifled barrel. It's a single barrel shotgun as Muskets are generally longer than 30''. Plus, Military issued muskets used a metal ramrod not wood, even the cleaning screw is seperate from the rod from the standard issue musket.

    • @beardyface7977
      @beardyface7977 Год назад

      While I admit that the thing came apart entirely too easy for a real relic, I will contest that they DID checker stocks.

  • @LogLH737
    @LogLH737 9 месяцев назад

    that is not a flintlock it is a percussion hammer and they did not appear in the 18th century more of 19th century but 1820 it was being designed by Russia the USA great Britain and France all converting into the musket you have unless it was from the other country's thing yea it was from one of the 4

  • @theplotdragon
    @theplotdragon Год назад

    Clickbait, why would you use a picture of an almost destroyed gun as a thumbnail while the one in the video is barely even damaged?

  • @sergeyberdyshev6194
    @sergeyberdyshev6194 Год назад

    This is not the eighteenth century, but the nineteenth.A percussion cap gun.

  • @petrtr7602
    @petrtr7602 4 месяца назад

    gun manufactured 1830 + I wouldn't say it's a restoration. It completely loses its historical value

  • @danpatterson6937
    @danpatterson6937 Год назад +1

    Ehh...why does something see off? The buttplate for example.

  • @mihailchahmatov3609
    @mihailchahmatov3609 Год назад

    Чему их только у школе учили ...
    Если год 1800 , то и век восемнадцатый ?
    Слов нет, один сарказм....

  • @johanndelekta6167
    @johanndelekta6167 Год назад

    Eigentlic KEIN MUSQUET!!!!

  • @Кара76
    @Кара76 Год назад +5

    После этого раритет потерял в стоимости от20 до50%

    • @evgenymusanov2970
      @evgenymusanov2970 Год назад +2

      Да это и не раритет,дешевка.Такие и сейчас негры в африке ваяют.

    • @Кара76
      @Кара76 Год назад +1

      )))))

  • @markosterman419
    @markosterman419 Год назад

    Just wondering why your are wearing those bulky gloves.

  • @ДмитрийЧесный
    @ДмитрийЧесный Год назад +2

    Охотничье ружье середины или конца 19 века,никак не мушкет! В сибири с такими охотились до 60 годов

    • @glcart-cs5sc
      @glcart-cs5sc Год назад +1

      musket is a general term for single loading muzzle loaders

  • @JohnSmith-gu6ii
    @JohnSmith-gu6ii Год назад +1

    Was it converted because 18th century guns were flintlocks. 19th century guns were caplocks like this one.

    • @stephenchristiansen
      @stephenchristiansen Год назад

      I was just thinking that too

    • @Irusssska
      @Irusssska Год назад +2

      Can be the end of 18th as far as i know 🤔

    • @stephenchristiansen
      @stephenchristiansen Год назад

      @@Irusssska fair point

    • @evgenymusanov2970
      @evgenymusanov2970 Год назад

      @@Irusssska Patent 1822 year.

    • @jacobcarbajal7094
      @jacobcarbajal7094 Год назад

      That it's not a converted gun, for the style of mechanism always has been a percussion firearm but not from the 18th century in fact for the characteristcs I would say that it's from the last part of the 19th century

  • @kevwebb2637
    @kevwebb2637 Год назад

    Percussion caps didn't exist in the 18th century, only from the early 19th to the end of the US Civil War. Plus Military muskets used metal Ramrods not wood as it was standard issue. So this is a Civilian variant, his knowledge of Black Powder guns is beyond poor. Plus, it looks like a Traditions kit as it's no way it's original. This is a fake restoration, it looks like a replica purposely rusted and rotted out just for this.

    • @SStupendous
      @SStupendous Год назад

      Percussion caps lasted much longer than the civil war, we still use them in common hand grenades, mines etc... technically primers in most centerfire cartridges are the same, though we're mainly away from mercury fulminate now. Percussion weapons were being widely used 25 years following the war, i.e. percussion revolvers.
      Yeah video seems very dodgy

  • @MegaJosef5
    @MegaJosef5 Год назад +1

    Ну ружья не было ещё, а вот пистолет зачем по второму разу показывать???

  • @laurentdevaux5617
    @laurentdevaux5617 11 месяцев назад

    18th Century Musket... it's a joke ! Given the shape of the lock, this so-called musket can't be that old, it's typical of the 1840' years. All in all, it's a nice hunting rifle. A pity though you made so many mistakes in your restoration work

  • @juliomendonca4656
    @juliomendonca4656 Год назад

    por isso que as guerras demoravam pra caramba pra acabar

  • @2K_Restoration
    @2K_Restoration Год назад

    kỹ năng.////

  • @evgenymusanov2970
    @evgenymusanov2970 Год назад +1

    Блин"знаток",ружбайка 19 века,или что капсюльный замок от кремневого отличить не можешь?И да,сварщик из тебя как из г...... пуля.

  • @deinelof
    @deinelof Год назад

    💀👍🏻

  • @danczog
    @danczog 7 месяцев назад

    You could have left that musket alone

  • @71lupenzo710
    @71lupenzo710 Год назад

    revenant rifle

    • @SStupendous
      @SStupendous Год назад

      Completely different gun in every way, even looks different entirely if you don't know anything about guns