One has to accept the fact that no war machine is invincible. You get to know the efficacy of a hardware when you put it into action against the equal opponent not the weaker armies. For instance, the F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the much vaunted stealth drone was taken out by the Iranian forces. Here in the case of Ukraine war , Russia is fighting an opponent who has almost similar military strategy and weapons like Russia even if it's much inferior to the invading army. On top of that, the Ukrainian military is armed to the teeth by the west against Russia with modern weapons. If only the US and Russia go to war with each other should we get to know the damage that war brings to each other and to analyze the weapons qualities. Anyone can claim anything on a forum but that will not be the case when it comes to reality.
The F-117 that was shot was because the radar commander amplified all clutter, ground and air... He got VERY lucky in picking out his target and also shot a shitload of missiles into the ether. It was truly a miraculous shot but did indeed prove it could be done! It's one of the reasons I get pissed off when the US sends stealth fighters up to escort soviet... I mean Russian spy planes!!! They are clearly trying to figure out how to detect them!!! When F-16s/15s will do, why send up your secret weapon? God I hate idiots!!!
The destruction of the F117 was a combination of several factors none of which were a fault of the aircraft. Due to poor planning the F117s came in through the exact same corridor theyve been using for weeks prior. They also knew the aircraft were coming due to a spy watching them take off. They positioned their anti air exactly where it had to be expecting correctly theyd use the same path. At the right time they started scanning twice and still didnt see them. Then against regulations a sort of obsessed commander ordered a third scan which coincidentally picked up one F117 during the brief moment the bombbay doors were open negating their stealth. They fired 2 missiles one of which was even dodged by the F117. The second one scored a sort of lucky hit. I think it speaks more for the F117 that despite all these factors basically creating a worst case scenario only a single F117 got shot down. I completely agree with your statement that no military hardware is invincible but I think thats a bad example of that.
@@TheDude50447 The F-117 pilot didn't dodge the first missile, the missile didn't go off because it was badly maintained as they didn't have enough money for good maintanance since Yugoslavia had a lot of sanctions but the second missile did detonate
Yes, the picture used in this video is from a Flanker. 35 is basically a modified 27 so they have identical cockpit with more advanced controls on the 35.
Great plane. But....... Russian pilots get 60 hours of actual flying time-seat time-in their planes. American pilots get 200. That cancels out the Russian "advantage". If there is one.
@@southpole4776 how? Doesn't the person firing it need training? Don't you think that's a part of pilot training-avoiding missiles? Modern technology is only as good as the person using it.
@@jeffrachau3920 nope. I am from the tech industry. Specifically computer science. Neither is pilot required nor a missile operator. we are past that. The weapons of today are from 3-5 decades ago. Military is made up of the relics of the past. The weapons under testing phase doesn't have a pilot or a missile operator
@@southpole4776 That's cool! Kelly Johnson was ask once what went at Area 51. He wouldn't say-other than to tell his friend "just think 50 years or more into the future. We are already there. All that stuff you see on television isn't science fiction". I found him rather awesome. I have no problem believing you. It's just that I grew up in an age where men and women flew planes not computers and I have a hard time with that. Glad to know you!
Great video from a wonderful channel. Art books have provided me a much-needed escape from real life. When life was difficult I'd set up my easy chair with coffee, a desk lamp and a stack of art books beside me. They kept me going during the hardest times. My art books are the best investments I ever made. My 4 favorite books are: - Wonderworks by Michael Whelan - Legacy by Frank Frazetta - Infinite Worlds by Vincent DiFate - Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
@@clives344 you are very lost no aircraft is 100% invisilbe i can imagine an su57 powerful 400km radar can see it haha Usa claimed the same in 1999 with f117 that f117 is very stealthy but it got shot down with an 50 years old radar....
@@FIKZKEY Boo Hoo. Who said Stealth Aircraft are 100 invisible? We are not talking about Klingon Cloaking Device we are not there yet - your thinking about Star Trek.
The main reason why the ATF or advance tactical fighter program was made is because of this aircraft and the legacy fighter like the SU27 and its MiG counterparts. This was designed to counter the F15 eagle and the mass produced F16. SU35 is a heavy fighter this is because Russia is the biggest country in terms of landmass. The whole of the northern part of Asia is owned by Russia. In order to defend its vast land area it need a heavy fighter with a heavy weapons loadout and huge gas tank.
While Russia's land mass is certainly what you say, I find it hard to believe this fighter could even cover a little more than it's designated combat radius which then means that bases would have to placed, at least with slightly overlapping coverage, and the Ruskies hardly have enough jets to do that! They'd be using lots of SU-24s, 27s and what few MiGs they'll have after Ukraine gets done with them...
@@titanproductions3628 air superiority fighter that can't win air superiority. Just what Russia needs in its 5th dimension chess game. Are they redeploying them back to Russia as well?
I remember on a Wings Of The Red Star they said there was a Sukhoi fighter that also had a bathroom and a cot for sleeping in it. For some reason that impresses me. Lol. Has anybody heard of this? What model Sukhoi would it be?
Like any fighter aircraft, they're only as good as the pilots who fly them and the mechanics who have to maintain them on a regular basis. These are very high maintenance aircraft and require almost as many down time hours as they do flying hours. Just saying.
@@TheFlatlander440 good grief, you're still holding to that jingoistic crap despite overwhelming evidence that you're wrong? That's quite an achievement.
A stationary radar that requires directional illumination of the target, with a non-rotary radar that allows an anti-missile maneuver to be performed when launching a missile... And yes, let me remind you, although the Su-35 has an outdated radar, it is very powerful, the F-35 is visible from 150km+, and if it also comes with external missiles... 20kW radar power.
It has Irbis E radar which is one of the best passive radars ever made. Being it's a big radar it's better than some AESA radars. But to put it on par with the other AESA fighters. The main radar is assisted by 2 small AESA radars in the wings. An upgrade is planned to put SU 57's AESA radar in SU 35.
The SU-30 is a 2 seat variant, it’s role is something similar to the F-15E, it also came into service years before the SU-35. The SU-33 is a naval carrier variant similar to the F-14 and F-18.
The SU-34 is ground attack variant, again similar to the F-15E but with more emphasis on air-to-ground than the SU-30 while the SU-30 is more capable for air-to-air.
Assuming the giant RCS of the Su-35 survives to a suicidal merge, what makes you think its opponents aren’t going to face-shoot it with Helmet-HOBS missiles, many of which in the West are now BVR-capable as well? AIM-9X Block II+ and ASRAAM have significant range increases over their legacy models, with FPA seekers, not IR-dependent. This again assumes the Su-35S has survived multiple data-link guided BVRAAMs. The Russian pilots haven’t even graduated into brevity codes on the Radio, don’t have secure radios.
@@JimCarner FPA seekers are typically IR spectrum, but modern Passive Seeker AAMs have different ways for initial targeting available to them, namely data-link and LOAL. There isn’t another fighter as well-equipped in this space for targeting and signals connectivity to the missile before and during its flight than F-35. Any discussion about trying to make legacy fighters compete in this space is a waste of time, which is why every single fighter design in development is VLO or LO, depending on the limitations of the country’s technical and industrial base.
@@andreil1576 Я не смотрю телевизор. Есть фото и видео сбитых Су-35 над Украиной с начала войны, задокументированные независимыми источниками, которые подтверждают серийные номера и маркировку самолетов. Добро пожаловать в XXI век.
@@JimCarner Legacy FPA seekers are typically IR spectrum. Things have changed a lot in the past 30 years when it comes to multi-mode initial, mid-course, and terminal guidance for AAMs, to include shorter-range versions. Even with treasonous acts from people close to key technologies being handed over to Russia & China, it doesn't matter. PSP variability makes the latest countermeasures useless.
Yes, that is why several countries have cancelled their orders. The radar is outdated and there is no system to deter heat seeking missiles beside flares.
@@chrismanning1171 Im not aware of any other widely adopted system to deter IR tracking. Well other than trying to create a lower IR signature overall.
@@TheDude50447 I can't remember the names of the two different types of systems. The systems will either bombard the missile with microwaves to jam the tracking or if the missile is using an optic eye lasers wills be aimed at the eye to confuse the tracking.
@@chrismanning1171 dude it is a mix Pesa and Aesa, but with range of over 400km it is very advanced Pesa, and it is not lacking anything compared to Aesa
Superior isn’t an absolute. Something can only be superior to something. What do you think this is superior to? F-22, F-35, Eurofighter, Rafale? No, on all of those counts.
First confirmed downing was only today so assuming they have been flying them all month that’s pretty good. Much better than there tanks are doing at least 😂
@@devinerentalsltd8708 I mean Su-35 and other means of aerial warfare failed to neutralize both Ukrainian air force and air defense. They still claim kills, both airplanes and cruise missiles
You have no idea what you are talking about...you still believe there is such thing as stealth airplane and that Russia cant make a radar...What a stupidity. SU 35 together with su 30 liberated Syria pretty much
No. It rocks one of the best passive radars ever. Irbis E. Being it's a big radar it is better than some AESA radars. But bringing it up to par with other aircraft. It has two AESA radars in the wings. And will inherent the AESA radar from SU 57. Irbis E is good but got to keep up with the chinese and americans. Well, the chinese for sure. As the chinese claimed J-10 mopped the floor with SU-35. SU-35 is still one of the best aircraft in the world. And has racked up air to air victories.
I think what the Ukraine war is proving us is the Russian military equipment may look to be the real deal but in real combat situations it's failing badly. Just looking in the cockpit of the SU-35 looks like a 1970's plane with inferior avionics when compared to American and European fighters. I really can't see this doing much against an F35 or Eurofighter Typhoon.
Советую не недооценивать русское оружие. Украина - это не война, это операция. это фокус, в котором запад разрывает задницу и обманывает вас ложной информацией. Если ты недооцениваешь Россию, ты можешь смотреть на цель создания НАТО, юноша.
I have watched many podcasts of Indian airforce sukhoi pilots and one point they commonly raise is avionics russian avionics are not upto the mark, western avionics are far superior and this war is proving that and that's why IAF has to install Israeli avionics in there sukhoi.
Because at the time russia start to sell this jet, ukraine rebel launches missiles to Malaysia MH317 which later nobody except russian allied want to buy russia product again. Even my country nol longer want to buy russia aircraft because russia is now in sanction which if anybody buy their weapon, US and its allies Will also sanction those buyers
Just imagine Iran is getting 24 of the su35 plus upgrade of all its jets by Russia and S400 This will increase Iran's defense and retaliation with its war with enemy
@@boboboy8189 Because Russia has a significantly larger military with many more men and supplies. Russia’s losing far more soldiers and equipment than Ukraine, and Russia’s lost over half of the territory it once held. Plus, Russia has been on its heels retreating. Ukraine has taken back more land in the prior six weeks than what Russia took during its entire winter offensive. Don’t forget that Russia was supposed to win in just three days, and at the start of the war the west only provided a small amount of assistance by providing Javelins, NLAWS, and manpads. Despite fighting a country on its own border, Russia’s logistical capabilities have shown to be horrible; its army poorly led, equipped and trained; its navy has disappeared from the fight against a country without a navy; and its air force was unable to achieve air superiority over a country with an air force that is significantly outnumbered and with very aged aircraft.
@@arighteousname5882 listen, the war always is not an easy issue! May be the F 35 could be also knocked by very old anti aircraft weapons! That is the real deal of any war. But what I am talking is the genuinity of this jet fighter (su 35) its one of the best jet right now, regarding all aspects: M-bility, speed, radar, louded missiles, D-D(detecting distance), all required sophisticated technology
@@4rct1c9Ic3m4n hh in very logic question: you didnt question me about this issue, you dont know what I know about this topic! All what you wrote is just normal comment, that has nothing to do with knowledgeable research
"Superiority" over it's older SU-27 brother, but still 4th gen and far behind western jets - especially not having AESA radar or low observability. The current conflict is proof that a lot of Russian weapons are just as cheap and boastful like in Soviet days.
it's extremely funny to read your "based on nothing" conclusions. Half of the NATO countries are using Soviet/Russian planes to these days even though they could've replaced them easily. I have BA in aerospace engineering unlike you and I had particular interest in Soviet planes. They are not ultimately superior machines but they got their advantages (better physics and consequently maneuverability) and disadvantages (you've stated some, but I could say that its electronics are in general outdated). But you don't need to know anything about them, ideology and propaganda is enough, right?
@@egorkonovalov9888 Who is "that car guy"? It's clear you're biased, but those new NATO countries inherited those jets and certainly aren't the wealthier ones able to "easily replace them" as you say, yet they are starting to. Having good kinetics and energy conservation is moot if your enemy sees and shoots first. The game is changing and Russia's piss poor performance with newer jets and superior numbers is proof that NATO trained Ukrainians in older jets can punch above their weight. Imagine pilots with superior tactics, training, superior numbers AND technology. LOL - ideology and propaganda?! I lived through the cold war and remember all the Soviet claims of superior weapons, which were largely exaggerations. While ever country has a certain amount of "propaganda" I'll take the society with more freedoms of speech, journalism, and an open internet.
@@Phrancis5 what Soviet exaggerations you are talking about? Sending first person to space? First nuclear power plant? Largest supersonic aircraft? Yes, there are exaggerations, no doubt, but I'm willing to trust that the country that achieved so much in one of the most advanced areas of practical physics like rocket science, was able to develop a pretty decent jet.
Oh the % of world weapon sales from Russia has dropped I just a bit since the war. I mean, it’s diminished to 6% when considering new weapons sales. It will be cool to see how these do against the f-16s.
US retired pilot Dan Hampton said recently these Jets are junk ? It's big, easy to see on radar , and it is easy to hit with missiles . It's impressive to look at, though, 👍 like all Russian Combat Jets
As far as i know, this jet had a combat training with the rafale( made in France) in 2020. The result of the battle was a completely lose for the su 35 😂😂😂
@@parasite4187 Because they performed so poorly in the tests. It was the same with Algeria which also disqualified the SU-35 due to the poor performance.
Ah yes, only 24 purchased by the PLAAF. PLAAF pilots' comments: This is almost a generation older than our fighters, and our J16 is heaps above this jet.
Look i can understand that you support Ukraine like i do , but you also need to understand that the war in Ukraine is fought without proper planning by Russians and is still being fought due to Putin being stubborn. If proper invasion planning was done then I don't think Ukraine would have lasted 1 month in battle . Russian attack plans are messy and frankly it's no use just sending recruits out on the field with no proper planning or strategy to die, Russian haven't still deployed it's full force yet ,only 1/4 th it's force is in Ukraine. Russian are few kilometres from the capital Kiev if am not wrong. Look i know emotions dictate to make us look away from facts but on ground Russians have occupied large amounts of ground in Ukraine and it's kinda bananas to think that Ukraine can dream to reconquer the lands back from Russians. Only loosers of war is both Russia and Ukraine, only people profitting is American weapons manufacturers. Some of the javlins and nlaws have also fallen in hands of Russian soilders , don't you think they will reverse engineer it and make updations on their own anti tank weapons
@@allenjoseph3350 I don't think Russian set backs have to do with "un propper planing" as much as it has to do with its old outdated military doctrine and lack of modern capabilities and how they rage war in general. I think Russia underestimated the will of Ukrainians to resist them and they capabilities they possess as far as anti armor weapons go that they've received from NATO. Russia has had plenty of time time to plan for this invasion seeing as though they've had troops on the Ukrainian border for at least six months now. It's the illogical Russian military doctrine that has them facing the problems they are currently having in a country they are invading that's their neighbor. As far as reverse engineering certain anti tank weapons like the javelin the concern is whether or not the Russian could actually do it but rather could the russains actually afford to do it. I'm surprised that that in this day in age the Russians don't already have their version of the javelin so this notion of them capturing some and reverse engineering them is kind of irrelevant.
@@arighteousname5882 i think they do have rpg series in 21 -30 series .the problem Russians are facing is that it's not fighting Ukrainian tanks , it's facing guerrilla warfare against enemy ,where javeline type weapons cannot be used, with Armor on Russian side becoming a prey to javeline . Most Russian tanks in the theater doesn't have soft kill systems to protect against javeline and RPGs . Sorry to say this only reason Ukraine has been holding out is due to metre support of the west and foreign legions . Once Kiev gets cut off from rest of Ukraine , it's all over . The battle to stifle Ukrainian supply of weapons is ongoing with surrounding towns and cities being targetted by Russians.Russians are training with s400 and have still not deployed it with the invading army. It's 400 km range at the invasions points is enough to deter Ukrainian air force . Drones are cool and all but s400 is not a standalone weapon system ,it is accompanied with defence system to neutralize drones.Russian Navy is not fully involved or it would have bombarded with its hypersonic missile armament against which there are no western counters , leave counter, west lags behind in this sector, with no operational hypersonic missile system
@@allenjoseph3350 either way the Russian military isn't as cracked up as it wanted the world to believe it is. This war is showing the world that Russia isn't as militarily sound and that the Ukrainians are exploiting the fundamental flaws that plague Rusdian military DOCTRINE. It speaks volumes that things are that bad for the Russian military when they are having trouble invading a country that's on their own border. No matter how this conflicts ends up turning out this isn't a good look for Russia.
@@arighteousname5882 Russian did miscalculate , but the fight will be brought to the end when Kiev falls , the Russians are too proud to come this close to Kiev and leave it unconqured , either way ukrain will be split again , all this loss of life is not worth anything
Good speed and agility, poor mutual support systems, poor data links, average radar, good IRST, engines burn out after 100 hours of use and need to be replaced. Poor parts supply, inadequate training, not enough monthly flight time. In theory good weapons but their preventive maintenance is suspect. Add all that up and its a threat but not the beast the media makes it out to be.
It doesn't have an AESA radar. It is toast without one against Western jets equipped with AESA radars. Even the F-16v will be a challenge for a Su-35 now, unthinkable 10 years ago.
@@boboboy8189 Russia doesn’t have the same manufacturing capabilities to build high tech equipment on mass scale efficiently. Plus, Russia is over twenty years behind in this field, and it’s demonstrated a dependence on western technology for its high tech equipment. From its T-90 using French optics, to nearly every missile, EW system, attack helicopters, all using US made microchips, the Russian land have shown that they are dependent on western goods. Put it this way, in the MMRCA tender, India’s Air Chief said that the US had the best weapons, radars and systems, and the US wasn’t even offering its best. On the other hand, Russia’s Mig-35 failed primarily because of two reasons, its radar, which failed to reach desired acquisition ranges, and its engines.
@@liveandletlift370 the Ukrainian airforce rn is more or less a mission kill already at this point, its more in the "try not to get killed by random dude with a stinger"
The Su35 is horrible, it still uses the Irbis-E radar which is a PESA radar based on 1950s technology. It can't even jam and needs weaker external pods to do so. Any AESA aircraft would track and jam it first. Russia makes terrible equipment as seen in Ukraine.
@@darhammora7867 How do you know that this is that case? You 've been there? I understand that it is 21th century and you have access to tons of videos about this tragedy in Ukraine with loads of propaganda and fakes on both sides... (though ukrainian side seems much more into that).. In general, people tend not to analyse data objectively but rather using "wishfull thinking" method instead..
@@Tesla34000 there is a video for the captured pilot talking, but it turns as he said it was a Su-30SM not Su-35S, and later a picture surfaced for 2 parachutes in the sky confirming it was a 2 seat Su-30SM rather than Su-35S
@@darhammora7867 that was different case which happened almost 2 weeks ago. This one happend two days ago at the same place where RF shot down Ukranian Su 27 at least that is what photos and video shows
@@nikolai2917 this one is so widely reported that you need not dig too far, pick your favourite source and they’re bound to have the article. Lots of picture to verify it too.
Russians have only deployed older su 27 and mig 29. They're using their scrap tech and dragging the war on in order to make nato spend more money that they can pay. From the outside it looks like a shit strategy but for a cold perspective they are hurting EU and US economy better than any sanctions making them pay the ukranian war effort
Sigh... The F22 and F35 have two different configurations. One is for stealth and the other is when the USAA has gained complete air dominance. The idea behind both the aircraft (more so the F35) is to destroy any and all enemies before anyone else can get close as their long range A-A capability is still better as too is their radar. I just really wish you people, the ones who post these type of videos wouldn't be so full of it.
It was hype until Ukraine and we finally got to see the true colors of these aircraft, Trash. This is Russias version of the Vietnam war which after this conflict they will have to go back to the drawing board for their entire air force. Super manuvering was relevant back when heat seeking missiles where the bread and butter of the USAF, Today not so much. If Russia has problems with a non ranked Air force. Imagine if they had picked on a NATO member with F-16's F-15's, Typhoon, Gripen or even Rafale. It's a no win situation for Russia or anyone who operates them.
If they’d done that to anyone besides Ukraine they would’ve mopped the floor with you. I mean do you not find it a bit troubling that despite the west training them on THEIR TACTICS, arming them to the teeth and possessing the second largest standing army and second most extensive air defences they’re still getting bodied?
@@ghostfacegrillah7891 exactly, most people dont understand that this is a NATO vs Russia war, only the Ukrainian people fight instead of the Westerners, it is...to some degree understandable that Russia is mobilising against a well equiped, motivated, supported and trained, expirienced oponent.
Every time Russia builds somthing new.. o it's very dangerous we need something to counter it. So far all those claims since the 50s have been wrong. I'm sure its a dangerous fighter jet but probably not much more than the mig-29. Adjustable exhaust may help in a fact face dog fight. Other than that the cobra strike is just a nice airshow move and a way to blend off your speed when you shouldn't.
Su 35 is a heavy fighter. Not saying su 35 is superior but it's armament and some other advantage make it a considerable threat to the western planes. There's a reason why this channel that usually praise western military hardware make a video about a superiority of a Russian jet fighter
@@regizeelement8511 Actually, I'm referring to an entire flight package of ELINT, AWACS, advanced fighter radar, fire control systems, superior long range fire support, armaments, better maintenance, logistical support and far superior training. no, brah.. actually, I DO know what I'm talking about and you are talking out your ass because some fancy paintcolor on a jet.............
![Diggy Graves - Red Vineyard [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Ro085T0mnQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Megan Thee Stallion - Mamushi (Remix) [feat. TWICE] [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5c0_u9PsrsQ/mqdefault.jpg)
That thrust vectoring is a Game Changer!
I always liked sukhoi fighters they just look beautiful
True.
They definitely look powerful
Looks better blown up
Don't judge a book by its cover...
@@DrMrPersonGuy to be fair it is a shit book.
It has a elegant yet powerful silhouette. Perfect revile for western fighter jets.
You don't even know 💀
Uraaaaa love from indonesia
Given the severe lack of flight hours for Russian pilots, an American Cessna pilot could probably smoke one in a dog fight.
It is beautiful, shame that they’re being wasted like this
Rival*
Beautiful plane no doubt.
Yes agree looks amazing but it has proved to be a major disappointment
A major disappointment? It was made for air to air kills, not CAS like its being used to.
@@clives344 coming from ignorance?
@@krissCOW simple stop using it for CAS 🤯
@@clives344 bruh it's not that simple
I don't care where your Allegiance are. The plane itself is beautiful aesthetically. So graceful looking
Beauty of jets. It does what it can best and with agility
One has to accept the fact that no war machine is invincible. You get to know the efficacy of a hardware when you put it into action against the equal opponent not the weaker armies. For instance, the F-117 was shot down in Yugoslavia and the much vaunted stealth drone was taken out by the Iranian forces. Here in the case of Ukraine war , Russia is fighting an opponent who has almost similar military strategy and weapons like Russia even if it's much inferior to the invading army. On top of that, the Ukrainian military is armed to the teeth by the west against Russia with modern weapons. If only the US and Russia go to war with each other should we get to know the damage that war brings to each other and to analyze the weapons qualities. Anyone can claim anything on a forum but that will not be the case when it comes to reality.
The F-117 that was shot was because the radar commander amplified all clutter, ground and air...
He got VERY lucky in picking out his target and also shot a shitload of missiles into the ether.
It was truly a miraculous shot but did indeed prove it could be done!
It's one of the reasons I get pissed off when the US sends stealth fighters up to escort soviet... I mean Russian spy planes!!!
They are clearly trying to figure out how to detect them!!!
When F-16s/15s will do, why send up your secret weapon?
God I hate idiots!!!
The destruction of the F117 was a combination of several factors none of which were a fault of the aircraft. Due to poor planning the F117s came in through the exact same corridor theyve been using for weeks prior. They also knew the aircraft were coming due to a spy watching them take off. They positioned their anti air exactly where it had to be expecting correctly theyd use the same path. At the right time they started scanning twice and still didnt see them. Then against regulations a sort of obsessed commander ordered a third scan which coincidentally picked up one F117 during the brief moment the bombbay doors were open negating their stealth. They fired 2 missiles one of which was even dodged by the F117. The second one scored a sort of lucky hit. I think it speaks more for the F117 that despite all these factors basically creating a worst case scenario only a single F117 got shot down. I completely agree with your statement that no military hardware is invincible but I think thats a bad example of that.
@@TheDude50447 nice h'wud script
@@nstvm82 whats that?
@@TheDude50447 The F-117 pilot didn't dodge the first missile, the missile didn't go off because it was badly maintained as they didn't have enough money for good maintanance since Yugoslavia had a lot of sanctions but the second missile did detonate
Wow, this fighter plane is amazing!🤠
Absolutely incredible aircraft 100 percent
I love the Sukhoi family especially the SU 30 MKI of our Indian airforce and now this SU 35
I don't like the idea of murder weapons, but I have to admit this plane does look mighty cool.
Terbaik SU 35 FLANKER ❤❤❤❤
At 1:48 thats not an Su-35 cockpit but Su-30MK or some other version of the Su-27
Yes, the picture used in this video is from a Flanker. 35 is basically a modified 27 so they have identical cockpit with more advanced controls on the 35.
@@skny2282 The 35 has two big screens, and is nowhere near the old Su-27 cockpit. Google it
@@flanker8724 due to the budget, SU-35 is developed from the Soviet era SU-27 just like a 1988 car built on a 1977 chassis with newer dashboard.
@@skny2282 What do you wanna say?
Great plane. But....... Russian pilots get 60 hours of actual flying time-seat time-in their planes. American pilots get 200. That cancels out the Russian "advantage". If there is one.
If a missile with 0 experience can shoot down fighter jets, training in general gets cancelled out
@@southpole4776 how? Doesn't the person firing it need training? Don't you think that's a part of pilot training-avoiding missiles? Modern technology is only as good as the person using it.
@@jeffrachau3920 nope. I am from the tech industry. Specifically computer science. Neither is pilot required nor a missile operator. we are past that. The weapons of today are from 3-5 decades ago. Military is made up of the relics of the past. The weapons under testing phase doesn't have a pilot or a missile operator
@@southpole4776 That's cool! Kelly Johnson was ask once what went at Area 51. He wouldn't say-other than to tell his friend "just think 50 years or more into the future. We are already there. All that stuff you see on television isn't science fiction". I found him rather awesome. I have no problem believing you. It's just that I grew up in an age where men and women flew planes not computers and I have a hard time with that. Glad to know you!
It's been the case since.. Cold War for fears of defection, corruption (illegal selling of the plane)
Flanker - стремительный красавчик! Создан и просчитан эргономичнски правильно!
Excellent 👍
Great video from a wonderful channel.
Art books have provided me a much-needed escape from real life. When life was difficult I'd set up my easy chair with coffee, a desk lamp and a stack of art books beside me. They kept me going during the hardest times. My art books are the best investments I ever made.
My 4 favorite books are:
- Wonderworks by Michael Whelan
- Legacy by Frank Frazetta
- Infinite Worlds by Vincent DiFate
- Great Fighter Jets of the Galaxy 1 by Tim Gibson
I am confused. I didn't think the USSR dissolved until after 1990. He said the Su35 was first flown in 1988. What did I misunderstand?
the Su-27 flew in 1988. Su-35 the latest version
Su35 did the first fly in 2014
Amazingly beautiful ❤️
Russians focus on maneuverability but in modern warfare its about the intelligence and capability of the weapons systems.
Only time will tell.
I hope you now know of how powerful those Russians are
A TO VSETKO MAJU A SPLNAJU RUSKE SU 35
So huge aircraft Rolling in the air. Unbelievable
Big RCS
@@clives344 you are very lost no aircraft is 100% invisilbe i can imagine an su57 powerful 400km radar can see it haha Usa claimed the same in 1999 with f117 that f117 is very stealthy but it got shot down with an 50 years old radar....
@@FIKZKEY Boo Hoo. Who said Stealth Aircraft are 100 invisible? We are not talking about Klingon Cloaking Device we are not there yet - your thinking about Star Trek.
@@clives344 mad? haha dont forget for the game changers in ukraine or the best tank leopards!
@@FIKZKEY I am no longer sure what the game changers will be. Russia is playing a numbers game being the bigger country that can make the difference
The main reason why the ATF or advance tactical fighter program was made is because of this aircraft and the legacy fighter like the SU27 and its MiG counterparts. This was designed to counter the F15 eagle and the mass produced F16. SU35 is a heavy fighter this is because Russia is the biggest country in terms of landmass. The whole of the northern part of Asia is owned by Russia. In order to defend its vast land area it need a heavy fighter with a heavy weapons loadout and huge gas tank.
While Russia's land mass is certainly what you say, I find it hard to believe this fighter could even cover a little more than it's designated combat radius which then means that bases would have to placed, at least with slightly overlapping coverage, and the Ruskies hardly have enough jets to do that!
They'd be using lots of SU-24s, 27s and what few MiGs they'll have after Ukraine gets done with them...
@@chrislong3938 Ukraine can't do shit
@@chrislong3938 Really convincing propaganda 🤡
@@titanproductions3628 air superiority fighter that can't win air superiority. Just what Russia needs in its 5th dimension chess game. Are they redeploying them back to Russia as well?
@@puppetmasternostringsonme8293 They're doing 'shit' now... ay?
LOL!
What? Ukraine has shot down multiple SU-35’s and Russia has failed to gain air superiority. Can’t be that good.
Ukraine has not shot down neither one su 35 ...from where you get these kind of rubish
@@milanradovanovic3693 look it up
@@milanradovanovic3693 lol, like you aren’t a Russian troll. Keep your propaganda rolling….
I remember on a Wings Of The Red Star they said there was a Sukhoi fighter that also had a bathroom and a cot for sleeping in it. For some reason that impresses me. Lol. Has anybody heard of this? What model Sukhoi would it be?
Propaganda model most likely
Only bombers have such luxuries 😝
su 34, modified to be a bomber
Su 34
@@Alphalete7 🤡
Like any fighter aircraft, they're only as good as the pilots who fly them and the mechanics who have to maintain them on a regular basis. These are very high maintenance aircraft and require almost as many down time hours as they do flying hours. Just saying.
Like the f22 and f35
@@JamaicanMeCrazy Thing is, Russia doesn't have enough techs to go around not to mention spare parts.
@@TheFlatlander440 good grief, you're still holding to that jingoistic crap despite overwhelming evidence that you're wrong? That's quite an achievement.
@@slooob23 Prove me wrong bud.
@@TheFlatlander440 reality will do that soon enough "buddy"
No AESA. = obsolete 😑
not always
agreed
Uraaaaa
A stationary radar that requires directional illumination of the target, with a non-rotary radar that allows an anti-missile maneuver to be performed when launching a missile... And yes, let me remind you, although the Su-35 has an outdated radar, it is very powerful, the F-35 is visible from 150km+, and if it also comes with external missiles... 20kW radar power.
It has Irbis E radar which is one of the best passive radars ever made. Being it's a big radar it's better than some AESA radars. But to put it on par with the other AESA fighters. The main radar is assisted by 2 small AESA radars in the wings. An upgrade is planned to put SU 57's AESA radar in SU 35.
The simple fact is they are easy to detect making them past news.
Najbolji na svetu !
TOMU VER A ESTE BUDU KRAJSIE
Ukrainian soldier with a FIM-92 stinger is the biggest threat.
😅
Clearly not, seeing that there has only been 1 "confirmed kill" so far.
@@OldRhino yeah, but thats a lot of money for a country with an economy the size of Florida
@@ericheick7044 No it is not, 35 million dollars out of 70 billion...
these things can only shoot targets up to 10k feet, the Su 35 operates above 25k feet
It’s didn’t get shot down
Only 1 crashed
what genius engineering . beautifull fighter
Interesting history. But how do the SU30 and SU33 fit in?
The SU-30 is a 2 seat variant, it’s role is something similar to the F-15E, it also came into service years before the SU-35. The SU-33 is a naval carrier variant similar to the F-14 and F-18.
@@kaijenkins4513 thanks, and the SU34 is that more of an interceptor?
The SU-34 is ground attack variant, again similar to the F-15E but with more emphasis on air-to-ground than the SU-30 while the SU-30 is more capable for air-to-air.
When you get to close combat with this fighter , you are dead.
Assuming the giant RCS of the Su-35 survives to a suicidal merge, what makes you think its opponents aren’t going to face-shoot it with Helmet-HOBS missiles, many of which in the West are now BVR-capable as well? AIM-9X Block II+ and ASRAAM have significant range increases over their legacy models, with FPA seekers, not IR-dependent. This again assumes the Su-35S has survived multiple data-link guided BVRAAMs. The Russian pilots haven’t even graduated into brevity codes on the Radio, don’t have secure radios.
@@LRRPFco52 это тебе по телевизору сказали?😅 Сука ты от куда знаешь что используют Су 35?
@@JimCarner FPA seekers are typically IR spectrum, but modern Passive Seeker AAMs have different ways for initial targeting available to them, namely data-link and LOAL.
There isn’t another fighter as well-equipped in this space for targeting and signals connectivity to the missile before and during its flight than F-35.
Any discussion about trying to make legacy fighters compete in this space is a waste of time, which is why every single fighter design in development is VLO or LO, depending on the limitations of the country’s technical and industrial base.
@@andreil1576 Я не смотрю телевизор. Есть фото и видео сбитых Су-35 над Украиной с начала войны, задокументированные независимыми источниками, которые подтверждают серийные номера и маркировку самолетов. Добро пожаловать в XXI век.
@@JimCarner Legacy FPA seekers are typically IR spectrum. Things have changed a lot in the past 30 years when it comes to multi-mode initial, mid-course, and terminal guidance for AAMs, to include shorter-range versions.
Even with treasonous acts from people close to key technologies being handed over to Russia & China, it doesn't matter. PSP variability makes the latest countermeasures useless.
Beats The F22!
AJ F35
But isn’t it PESA radar borderline obsolescence already?
Yes, that is why several countries have cancelled their orders. The radar is outdated and there is no system to deter heat seeking missiles beside flares.
@@chrismanning1171 Im not aware of any other widely adopted system to deter IR tracking. Well other than trying to create a lower IR signature overall.
@@TheDude50447 I can't remember the names of the two different types of systems. The systems will either bombard the missile with microwaves to jam the tracking or if the missile is using an optic eye lasers wills be aimed at the eye to confuse the tracking.
@@chrismanning1171 And these systems are widely implemented? Because Ive never seen them on a service aircraft.
@@chrismanning1171 dude it is a mix Pesa and Aesa, but with range of over 400km it is very advanced Pesa, and it is not lacking anything compared to Aesa
I prefer this concept rather than the western f_35 or Tempest
What about all the badass Ukrainian made aircraft & tanks? 😂
All Russian surplus but they're not needed with the Western supplied anti-tank equipment they've been given.
They dont have any planes, but they do have some shitty tanks.
I would take SU-27 airframe with Western engines and avionics.
@Terabai Avionics System Still Russian engines.
It would be nice if had modern radar and electronic countermeasures
RCS is too huge, meaning it gets detected from extreme BVR. It’s a flying target essentially, for both A2A and SAM platforms.
the Chinese did just that
The SU-35 is what Darth Vader would choose if it comes in black..
It kinda looks like an F-16, F-18, and an F-15 got together for drinks one night, and, well, no one's quite sure who owes the child support....
Sure the su is a threat but is it really better than the f15x? Nope. No it is not
Make a detailed video on mig 35 please 🥺
29k chassis, 8G sustained, multirole, increased range and payload,
Superior isn’t an absolute. Something can only be superior to something. What do you think this is superior to? F-22, F-35, Eurofighter, Rafale? No, on all of those counts.
So superior that Ukrainians claim to still fly sorties to this day
First confirmed downing was only today so assuming they have been flying them all month that’s pretty good. Much better than there tanks are doing at least 😂
@@devinerentalsltd8708 I mean Su-35 and other means of aerial warfare failed to neutralize both Ukrainian air force and air defense. They still claim kills, both airplanes and cruise missiles
"Ukrainian claims" ~ how to tell if a statement is false
Yes they just "claim" and show vide game footages
UKRAINA MA HOVNO A NEZAUJIMA MA CO TREPE UA
It has no AESA radar system, so it is a jet of past time, oldtimer
You have no idea what you are talking about...you still believe there is such thing as stealth airplane and that Russia cant make a radar...What a stupidity. SU 35 together with su 30 liberated Syria pretty much
No. It rocks one of the best passive radars ever. Irbis E. Being it's a big radar it is better than some AESA radars. But bringing it up to par with other aircraft. It has two AESA radars in the wings. And will inherent the AESA radar from SU 57. Irbis E is good but got to keep up with the chinese and americans. Well, the chinese for sure. As the chinese claimed J-10 mopped the floor with SU-35. SU-35 is still one of the best aircraft in the world. And has racked up air to air victories.
@@jg3000killed obsolete sukhois 😂
I think what the Ukraine war is proving us is the Russian military equipment may look to be the real deal but in real combat situations it's failing badly. Just looking in the cockpit of the SU-35 looks like a 1970's plane with inferior avionics when compared to American and European fighters. I really can't see this doing much against an F35 or Eurofighter Typhoon.
Советую не недооценивать русское оружие. Украина - это не война, это операция. это фокус, в котором запад разрывает задницу и обманывает вас ложной информацией.
Если ты недооцениваешь Россию, ты можешь смотреть на цель создания НАТО, юноша.
I have watched many podcasts of Indian airforce sukhoi pilots and one point they commonly raise is avionics russian avionics are not upto the mark, western avionics are far superior and this war is proving that and that's why IAF has to install Israeli avionics in there sukhoi.
6 طائرات f35 سقطت بدون قتال
هل نقول عنها انها فاشلة 😏
@@aliazeez2286 yes
Doesnt matter how it looks, it is a very good plane for its value.
A huge commercial success that hardly anyone wants. We wonder why.
Because at the time russia start to sell this jet, ukraine rebel launches missiles to Malaysia MH317 which later nobody except russian allied want to buy russia product again. Even my country nol longer want to buy russia aircraft because russia is now in sanction which if anybody buy their weapon, US and its allies Will also sanction those buyers
SAN-CTI-ONS... Easy answer, the us would bribe the country with money and free f 35's and then start imposing sanctions if that does not work.
Just imagine Iran is getting 24 of the su35 plus upgrade of all its jets by Russia and S400
This will increase Iran's defense and retaliation with its war with enemy
if it's so superior, why there's no ruzzian air superiority in Ukraine? yeah, cause all ruzzian tech is crap
'Cause air superiority isn't a part of Russia's military doctrine. Funny how your country is being destroyed by 'crap'.
@@definitelyfrank9341Russia is the one getting its ass kicked, and of course Russia would like air superiority. Don’t be so stupid.
@@Thetequilashooter1if russia is getting kick, why ukraine still didnt win yet but instead blaming nato?
@@boboboy8189 Because Russia has a significantly larger military with many more men and supplies. Russia’s losing far more soldiers and equipment than Ukraine, and Russia’s lost over half of the territory it once held. Plus, Russia has been on its heels retreating. Ukraine has taken back more land in the prior six weeks than what Russia took during its entire winter offensive. Don’t forget that Russia was supposed to win in just three days, and at the start of the war the west only provided a small amount of assistance by providing Javelins, NLAWS, and manpads. Despite fighting a country on its own border, Russia’s logistical capabilities have shown to be horrible; its army poorly led, equipped and trained; its navy has disappeared from the fight against a country without a navy; and its air force was unable to achieve air superiority over a country with an air force that is significantly outnumbered and with very aged aircraft.
As a military sciense student, I assur that Su 35 is one of the best jet ever built
Is That why they are getting knocked out of the skies of Ukraine 🇺🇦 lol🤣🤣
Based on your assessment regarding this aircraft, it shows you haven't learned much
@@arighteousname5882 listen, the war always is not an easy issue! May be the F 35 could be also knocked by very old anti aircraft weapons! That is the real deal of any war. But what I am talking is the genuinity of this jet fighter (su 35) its one of the best jet right now, regarding all aspects: M-bility, speed, radar, louded missiles, D-D(detecting distance), all required sophisticated technology
@@4rct1c9Ic3m4n hh in very logic question: you didnt question me about this issue, you dont know what I know about this topic! All what you wrote is just normal comment, that has nothing to do with knowledgeable research
@@arighteousname5882 where did you get that information
With su75..su35s now competed with f15ex..su30sm2 with the latest f15 strike eagles
The F22 Raptor and the F35JSF would blow this thing out the sky .The SU35 can't shoot what it can't see...
Su35 or atleast the su27 is meant to be equivalent to the F15
@@bike-cave-man2527 NATO can't fly the plane without gas
@@arunkrishnakumar692 Look at the avionics of the SU-35, they look like they've been stolen from the 70's.
Ok buddy, go to war and lets see how invincible your army is... the S400 defense system will blow your F35 out of the sky...
@@bike-cave-man2527 You're forgetting S-400 and S-500 systems that will blow these planes from the sky like target practice... Plus the Pantsir...
"Superiority" over it's older SU-27 brother, but still 4th gen and far behind western jets - especially not having AESA radar or low observability. The current conflict is proof that a lot of Russian weapons are just as cheap and boastful like in Soviet days.
it's extremely funny to read your "based on nothing" conclusions. Half of the NATO countries are using Soviet/Russian planes to these days even though they could've replaced them easily. I have BA in aerospace engineering unlike you and I had particular interest in Soviet planes. They are not ultimately superior machines but they got their advantages (better physics and consequently maneuverability) and disadvantages (you've stated some, but I could say that its electronics are in general outdated). But you don't need to know anything about them, ideology and propaganda is enough, right?
@@egorkonovalov9888 I doubt we will see any new Russian planes being sold anytime soon BA in aerospace or not.
@@geesehoward700 yeah probably, altho could be in small orders
@@egorkonovalov9888 Who is "that car guy"? It's clear you're biased, but those new NATO countries inherited those jets and certainly aren't the wealthier ones able to "easily replace them" as you say, yet they are starting to. Having good kinetics and energy conservation is moot if your enemy sees and shoots first. The game is changing and Russia's piss poor performance with newer jets and superior numbers is proof that NATO trained Ukrainians in older jets can punch above their weight. Imagine pilots with superior tactics, training, superior numbers AND technology. LOL - ideology and propaganda?! I lived through the cold war and remember all the Soviet claims of superior weapons, which were largely exaggerations. While ever country has a certain amount of "propaganda" I'll take the society with more freedoms of speech, journalism, and an open internet.
@@Phrancis5 what Soviet exaggerations you are talking about? Sending first person to space? First nuclear power plant? Largest supersonic aircraft? Yes, there are exaggerations, no doubt, but I'm willing to trust that the country that achieved so much in one of the most advanced areas of practical physics like rocket science, was able to develop a pretty decent jet.
Superiority against....?
I've heard they fall like flies in Ukraine. So, question is how many they have left, 20, 30?
No Russian Sukhois haven't been shot down by Ukraine . A Ukrainian Su27 got blown out by the russies
@@theduke1654 Russian Sukhois have been shot down such as multiple su25 at least one su34 and various flanker variants
@@theduke1654 4x SU-30SM, 8x SU-25 and 4x SU-34 are visually confirmed. That is probably just a fraction of real Su losses.
@@theduke1654 At least 4, with all sort of proofs, photos, etc.
@@theduke1654 A SU-35 was shot down a couple hours ago. It videos of it burning and a video of the pilot. You can go look.
Being rejected because of non AESA radar.
SU-35 , Mig-35
Caças Lindos E Temidos .
Com AESA e mais furtividades , f-35 e J-20 ,,com certeza seria mais questionados
It is false
No way they have more stealth capabilities than the 5th gen planes.
@@mitchjames9350he is not saying that it hás, just if it had...
Oh the % of world weapon sales from Russia has dropped I just a bit since the war. I mean, it’s diminished to 6% when considering new weapons sales. It will be cool to see how these do against the f-16s.
one of the most beautiful jets there is.
It is purty.
The most manuverable aircraft in the world
And it's losing to jets from thr 80s and 90s.
@@l3ete1geuse it is but you to kno all those jets were made and designed and constructed by Russia
@@bharathvyas3654 and that's relevant because?
US retired pilot Dan Hampton said recently these Jets are junk ? It's big, easy to see on radar , and it is easy to hit with missiles . It's impressive to look at, though, 👍 like all Russian Combat Jets
It's not much bigger than an F15 and has a similar radar cross section to the F15.....
As far as i know, this jet had a combat training with the rafale( made in France) in 2020. The result of the battle was a completely lose for the su 35 😂😂😂
Yeah, that it is usually the case when Russian military equipment faces the reality outside of the propaganda bubble.
@Adolf Putin war criminal yes
This news is not true. Egypt don’t have any su35.they ordered it but later they cancelled the deal of su 35
@Adolf Putin war criminal Your mommy leaders Obama/Bush and many more are the real war criminals kid 🤣
@@parasite4187 Because they performed so poorly in the tests. It was the same with Algeria which also disqualified the SU-35 due to the poor performance.
The jet is good. But the maintenance and pilots are not
There you go again..why you always overestimate Russian military hardware??? Come on you are America!!
اولا السو 35 من الجيل الرابع لايمكنك مقارنتها بطائرات الجيل الخامس.
ثانيا السو سقطت خلال القتال
في حين 6 طائرات اف 35 سقطت باعطال فنية
من الفاشل الان
So good that 2 squadrons were lost in 6 months over Ukraine, even china reports having many problems with them.
I think you got it wrong - The Russian military has been a realm stomach turner.
Ah yes, only 24 purchased by the PLAAF. PLAAF pilots' comments: This is almost a generation older than our fighters, and our J16 is heaps above this jet.
"Russia is absolutely a potential head turner"🤣🤣🤣🤣 what joke. Ukraine would like a word with you.
Look i can understand that you support Ukraine like i do , but you also need to understand that the war in Ukraine is fought without proper planning by Russians and is still being fought due to Putin being stubborn. If proper invasion planning was done then I don't think Ukraine would have lasted 1 month in battle . Russian attack plans are messy and frankly it's no use just sending recruits out on the field with no proper planning or strategy to die, Russian haven't still deployed it's full force yet ,only 1/4 th it's force is in Ukraine. Russian are few kilometres from the capital Kiev if am not wrong. Look i know emotions dictate to make us look away from facts but on ground Russians have occupied large amounts of ground in Ukraine and it's kinda bananas to think that Ukraine can dream to reconquer the lands back from Russians. Only loosers of war is both Russia and Ukraine, only people profitting is American weapons manufacturers. Some of the javlins and nlaws have also fallen in hands of Russian soilders , don't you think they will reverse engineer it and make updations on their own anti tank weapons
@@allenjoseph3350 I don't think Russian set backs have to do with "un propper planing" as much as it has to do with its old outdated military doctrine and lack of modern capabilities and how they rage war in general.
I think Russia underestimated the will of Ukrainians to resist them and they capabilities they possess as far as anti armor weapons go that they've received from NATO.
Russia has had plenty of time time to plan for this invasion seeing as though they've had troops on the Ukrainian border for at least six months now. It's the illogical Russian military doctrine that has them facing the problems they are currently having in a country they are invading that's their neighbor.
As far as reverse engineering certain anti tank weapons like the javelin the concern is whether or not the Russian could actually do it but rather could the russains actually afford to do it. I'm surprised that that in this day in age the Russians don't already have their version of the javelin so this notion of them capturing some and reverse engineering them is kind of irrelevant.
@@arighteousname5882 i think they do have rpg series in 21 -30 series .the problem Russians are facing is that it's not fighting Ukrainian tanks , it's facing guerrilla warfare against enemy ,where javeline type weapons cannot be used, with Armor on Russian side becoming a prey to javeline . Most Russian tanks in the theater doesn't have soft kill systems to protect against javeline and RPGs . Sorry to say this only reason Ukraine has been holding out is due to metre support of the west and foreign legions . Once Kiev gets cut off from rest of Ukraine , it's all over . The battle to stifle Ukrainian supply of weapons is ongoing with surrounding towns and cities being targetted by Russians.Russians are training with s400 and have still not deployed it with the invading army. It's 400 km range at the invasions points is enough to deter Ukrainian air force . Drones are cool and all but s400 is not a standalone weapon system ,it is accompanied with defence system to neutralize drones.Russian Navy is not fully involved or it would have bombarded with its hypersonic missile armament against which there are no western counters , leave counter, west lags behind in this sector, with no operational hypersonic missile system
@@allenjoseph3350 either way the Russian military isn't as cracked up as it wanted the world to believe it is. This war is showing the world that Russia isn't as militarily sound and that the Ukrainians are exploiting the fundamental flaws that plague Rusdian military DOCTRINE. It speaks volumes that things are that bad for the Russian military when they are having trouble invading a country that's on their own border. No matter how this conflicts ends up turning out this isn't a good look for Russia.
@@arighteousname5882 Russian did miscalculate , but the fight will be brought to the end when Kiev falls , the Russians are too proud to come this close to Kiev and leave it unconqured , either way ukrain will be split again , all this loss of life is not worth anything
Any jet are dependent on hightech radar, without it,its just a target.
Don't know whom to believe ,, whether the Russian supporters or the American supporters ,,
Both side supporters seem very smart in their defense 😄
Don’t believe either side, they both exaggerate. And that’s coming from a pro russian
Ghost of Kiev did it lol
Good speed and agility, poor mutual support systems, poor data links, average radar, good IRST, engines burn out after 100 hours of use and need to be replaced. Poor parts supply, inadequate training, not enough monthly flight time. In theory good weapons but their preventive maintenance is suspect. Add all that up and its a threat but not the beast the media makes it out to be.
SU 57 is failed.....the completely Programm is cancelled
2: 35 f15ex has 23 hardpoints
It doesn't have an AESA radar. It is toast without one against Western jets equipped with AESA radars. Even the F-16v will be a challenge for a Su-35 now, unthinkable 10 years ago.
The su 35 haves a PESA radar with an energy peak of 20kW, thats still very powerful
So by your logic 100% of USN's destroyers are toast to 90% of China's destroyers? Good to know.
Recently russia Just announced this jet Will be mass produce and Will equip same AESA radar from su-57
@@boboboy8189 Russia doesn’t have the same manufacturing capabilities to build high tech equipment on mass scale efficiently. Plus, Russia is over twenty years behind in this field, and it’s demonstrated a dependence on western technology for its high tech equipment. From its T-90 using French optics, to nearly every missile, EW system, attack helicopters, all using US made microchips, the Russian land have shown that they are dependent on western goods. Put it this way, in the MMRCA tender, India’s Air Chief said that the US had the best weapons, radars and systems, and the US wasn’t even offering its best. On the other hand, Russia’s Mig-35 failed primarily because of two reasons, its radar, which failed to reach desired acquisition ranges, and its engines.
@@Thetequilashooter1 So by your logic 100% of USN's destroyers are toast to 90% of China's destroyers? Good to know.
Considering the performance of Russian air force during the invasion of Ukraine, "superiority" of any Russian aircraft is questionable, at best.
its kinda up to the pilot too
@@sergeantblue6115 Up to the whole air force operating the jets.
@@liveandletlift370 yeah maintaining stuff too
@@sergeantblue6115 More about the in-air support and cooperation during complex operations, which seems to be non-existent in the Russian air-force.
@@liveandletlift370 the Ukrainian airforce rn is more or less a mission kill already at this point, its more in the "try not to get killed by random dude with a stinger"
The Su35 is horrible, it still uses the Irbis-E radar which is a PESA radar based on 1950s technology. It can't even jam and needs weaker external pods to do so. Any AESA aircraft would track and jam it first. Russia makes terrible equipment as seen in Ukraine.
1000+ sorties a day and a destroyed disordered enemy... Doing pretty badly
I am not saying the Commies are crap p but the Ukrainians are giving them hell at the moment
Didn't you guys lost one Su-35 yesterday?!
Who said so? Ukraine? Footage that I saw says nothing..
Just to be understood I am neutral here and want solid evidence of what you say
@@Tesla34000 there is a recording for the pilot, but it turns to be a Su-30SM not Su-35S
@@darhammora7867 How do you know that this is that case? You 've been there?
I understand that it is 21th century and you have access to tons of videos about this tragedy in Ukraine with loads of propaganda and fakes on both sides... (though ukrainian side seems much more into that)..
In general, people tend not to analyse data objectively but rather using "wishfull thinking" method instead..
@@Tesla34000 there is a video for the captured pilot talking, but it turns as he said it was a Su-30SM not Su-35S, and later a picture surfaced for 2 parachutes in the sky confirming it was a 2 seat Su-30SM rather than Su-35S
@@darhammora7867 that was different case which happened almost 2 weeks ago. This one happend two days ago at the same place where RF shot down Ukranian Su 27 at least that is what photos and video shows
As good as they get.
Except when it got shot down in Ukraine 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Yea its a really "superior" fighter
Source: trust me)
@@nikolai2917 suggest you watch the news plenty of pictures and footage
@@wbubbles5960, well which news then ? Ukrainians are well known for their fakes like Ghost of Kiev. Therefore I’m asking for the source
@@nikolai2917 this one is so widely reported that you need not dig too far, pick your favourite source and they’re bound to have the article. Lots of picture to verify it too.
Yep, Ukraine knocked a few of these jets out of the sky...
Well, that war in Ukraine isn't going so well for Russia, so it's not that much of a war gamechanger:)
Its going great actually
Even if it was that way, Ukraine only uses the old Russian fighter jets, so I don’t get your point
Russians have only deployed older su 27 and mig 29.
They're using their scrap tech and dragging the war on in order to make nato spend more money that they can pay.
From the outside it looks like a shit strategy but for a cold perspective they are hurting EU and US economy better than any sanctions making them pay the ukranian war effort
@@ScumbagKazuela well put
@@adamsmith2944 lmao no its not buddy
Sigh... The F22 and F35 have two different configurations. One is for stealth and the other is when the USAA has gained complete air dominance. The idea behind both the aircraft (more so the F35) is to destroy any and all enemies before anyone else can get close as their long range A-A capability is still better as too is their radar.
I just really wish you people, the ones who post these type of videos wouldn't be so full of it.
😂 after a year of war in Ukraina it seems this planes fall like flies in winter 🎉
they have only lost 2 in the entire war thus far
This feels AI generated
In use it's the Su-35S
so advanced that Ukraine Army shoot them down faster than they take flight IT'S LIKE ALL RUSSIAN COPYS !! JNK !!!
1 got shot down today, pilot captured.
But a uktaine soldier and a stinger can bring it down lol
A nice aircraft. The ukrainien IRIS-System will welcom it.
It was hype until Ukraine and we finally got to see the true colors of these aircraft, Trash. This is Russias version of the Vietnam war which after this conflict they will have to go back to the drawing board for their entire air force. Super manuvering was relevant back when heat seeking missiles where the bread and butter of the USAF, Today not so much. If Russia has problems with a non ranked Air force. Imagine if they had picked on a NATO member with F-16's F-15's, Typhoon, Gripen or even Rafale. It's a no win situation for Russia or anyone who operates them.
If they’d done that to anyone besides Ukraine they would’ve mopped the floor with you. I mean do you not find it a bit troubling that despite the west training them on THEIR TACTICS, arming them to the teeth and possessing the second largest standing army and second most extensive air defences they’re still getting bodied?
@@ghostfacegrillah7891 exactly, most people dont understand that this is a NATO vs Russia war, only the Ukrainian people fight instead of the Westerners, it is...to some degree understandable that Russia is mobilising against a well equiped, motivated, supported and trained, expirienced oponent.
I know that China purchased Su-35, and any country else?
That's why you stay at 35k feet
Would have liked to hear about the shootdown. It was only in the title.
SU 35 is still 10 years behind the western jets
it just an f-14 tomcat with modern equipment
Tech from the early 70s😂
Every time Russia builds somthing new.. o it's very dangerous we need something to counter it.
So far all those claims since the 50s have been wrong.
I'm sure its a dangerous fighter jet but probably not much more than the mig-29. Adjustable exhaust may help in a fact face dog fight.
Other than that the cobra strike is just a nice airshow move and a way to blend off your speed when you shouldn't.
Как же всё это предвзято..!
NA KOKPITE NEZALEZI ALE TO CO JE VNOM A PODNIM A TAM JE TOHO VELA OCOM SA MOZE LEN AMIGOM SNIVAT
I'm more confident than ever an F-16 could probably beat this thing.... and both the F15 and F22 could kill it dead easy...
My brother is an f22 pilot and I asked him about the su35 after the Ukrainian war started and he said it is superior to the f15 and definitely f16
@@Etha-xi8ei R16 single engined aka light fighter. Su35 is twin engined aka heavy fighter… you don’t know what you are talking about
Su 35 is a heavy fighter. Not saying su 35 is superior but it's armament and some other advantage make it a considerable threat to the western planes. There's a reason why this channel that usually praise western military hardware make a video about a superiority of a Russian jet fighter
F-16 was shot down by Mig-21🥺
@@regizeelement8511 Actually, I'm referring to an entire flight package of ELINT, AWACS, advanced fighter radar, fire control systems, superior long range fire support, armaments, better maintenance, logistical support and far superior training.
no, brah.. actually, I DO know what I'm talking about and you are talking out your ass because some fancy paintcolor on a jet.............