Fake kar rha hai bhai really you would think he would not know yhe Or prakhar dono Greek philosopher ki gyaan chod they rhey they they would not know about this basic info lol
22:59 How effortlessly Vinamra said, "Muh par toh bolte hain," but if the same were said about Muslims whether they are radicals and loyal to this nation, he'd nod vigorously and launch into a passionate defense, adding two more lines to their commendation. Now, that's what you call narrative! Hindus gets labeled as the castiest by default, while Muslims are painted as the Eternal Victims / BHATKE HUE LOG of this nation. Despite evidence to the contrary, it's become the accepted norm.
Bhai 72 firqe hain , ek dusre ko kafir bolte hain . Ek dusre ki masjido mein fat te hain bomb bandkar. Kabristan mein dafan nhi karne dete dead body ko , alag alag kabristan . But Hindus are castiest people . Bhai Jo dikhta hai sab sugercoated hai.
Leaving aside the Muslims who are obviously a danger to humanity, I can tell from my observation that Many of the Hindus are still casteist. Not to the level of untouchability (at least in urban areas) but I've had a Brahmin(by birth) friend who asked my surname before eating from my lunchbox. That day I felt so thankful that I could twll him proudly my surname (Singh implying that I'm not a so called low class after which he comfortably ate with me) which but suddenly it hit my mind, what if I was a so called SC? Many Hindus like me are against caste but many are covertly or overtly Casteist too But yes we have to change. And we will. let's accept our fault then only we can improve
@@R1TESH.absolutely true. It’s time the Hindu people get this in their heads. They can call us kafirs but can’t call them out for that , if we do than that will create a big hoopla and call us Islam aphrodisiacs!! Always a double standard!😡
He's shameless man how he is making. Baaber very. Good like. He was Angel I don't want to. Use. Bad word I am sikh and Hindu we are brothers and we love each other
Sahil ek converted Cristian hain jo funding leke kam karta hain against Hindu.agar koi muslim ke birodh bolega to gabar hindu usko sar pe chara ke rakha hain. Jake ke dekh back-end pe kya hota hain. Mera dost usko har din super chat deta tha. Ekdin usko messege pe bola sahilism pe ane ke jo bolta hain hindu ka sastra sab bekar hain, siva, krisna koi nahi hain but jessu hain. Matlab ek behen ke loda hi du o ko super chat lega and hindu god ko gali dega
it is not a right wing hindutva hate podcast to bring him....if people from the right wing are making him their father...i dont know what else do i have to say!!!
Kushal ki maakabharosa... That gandu thinks aryan invasion theory is true... That gandu looks like a South Indian who actually is a punjabi... B s d k.. Idhar hi clear ho jata hai ki... Hamare genetics ek hi hai... 😅
Kalma/Shahada/Azan which you hear daily from loudspeaker says Ash-hadu alla ilaha illa Allah, wa ash-hadu anna anna Muhammadan Rasulullah” I bear witness/ I give testimony that there is no god but God(Allah) and muhammed is his slave and Messenger. This is foundation of islam if you know......This statement is completely political and you have to hear daily that there is no god other than Allah and muhammed is his only Messenger and slave.....shariyat goes then on say that if muhammed is slave of Allah....every person is slave of Allah.....and and job of a Muslim to convert every one muslim so that another Day of Judgement (akhirat) comes and we all go Jannah(heaven) and hell... And there we get 72 virgins to enjoy....
Not being expansionist is actually counterproductive because when you don't have expansionist ambitions, people tend to find differences within and country breaks from within.. but when you are expansionist and entire country has a common enemy it becomes more stronger and United.
I would agree, but the way bharat expanded wasnt a warcry, rather it was rather a way of balance, to learn this we can look at our connections with other asian countries like china, burma, japan korea where not the people but the thoughts presented were accepted and exchanged too, indonesia malaysia sri lanka were all connected with bharat in one way or another equally accepting the other’s existence and importance.the war cry situation does seem to instill force in the common enemy but fails and get replled heavily at some point.
In Hinduism, there is no criticism. There are questions. In fact, the three central questions (who am I, where have I come from, where am I going) are the basis of Hinduism. In other religions, these three questions are forbidden. The answers are preset, and fed to the ‘believers’
How can se say this. How can we forget how upper castes so called Brahmins were hating and still hating lower castes. And Bhim Rao Ambedkar was a product of that friction. Hinduism still has this problem inside their genes. 😢
1)Nationalism started in India by Chtrapathi Shivaji Maharaj.... Hindavi Swarajya......all leaders from Maharashtra were nationalist.....Savarkar Carried the legacy forever.....Every other State lost to mughal at some point.... Aggressive Maratha resisted and won.......
Read Assam history....we were the only ones whom Mughal couldn't touch us. We were never doomed and even in times of Aurangzeb, 17 times we were attacked, but we resisted everytime. No doubt all respect to Shivaji Maharaj for he is the only one who could dream of independent Hindu Kingdom among Moghuls
@@maratha8808 evidences and findings before 10th century are not clear and not present to large extent..... Therefore we cannot conclude any fact of Indian society before 10 century clearly.......we can just speculate.....
And now i can call myself a true history student as i already knew the fact that Babur didnt liked the his Mongol ancestory and thus not the word Mughal
You are completely wrong. Karl Marx never wrote that everyone would have equal pay in a communist society. Karl Marx said that the more a person works, the more he gets paid. He wrote "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs". A person who has read Karl Marx cannot make such a stupid mistake. According to Karl Marx, the transition from capitalism to communism involves several significant political, social, and economic changes. Marx envisioned a series of stages that would ultimately lead to the establishment of a communist society, where the means of production are collectively owned and there is no private property or class distinctions. Let's explore the changes that Marx outlined for each stage in detail: 1. Capitalism: The starting point of Marx's analysis is capitalism, which he saw as characterized by private ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of labor. In this stage, the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class, owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat, or working class, sells their labor power to survive. The capitalist mode of production is driven by profit and competition. 2. Socialism (Lower Stage of Communism): Marx proposed that the first transitional stage from capitalism to communism would be socialism, also referred to as the lower stage of communism. In this stage, the means of production are collectively owned and controlled by the working class, representing a shift away from private ownership. However, Marx acknowledged that certain elements of capitalism may still persist during this stage, such as the continued existence of wages and the principle of "to each according to their work." The main objective of socialism is to gradually eliminate class distinctions and lay the groundwork for a fully communist society. During the socialist stage, Marx envisioned several key changes: - Abolition of private property: Private ownership of the means of production is replaced by collective ownership. This means that factories, land, and other productive resources are no longer owned by individuals or capitalists but are instead owned and managed by the working class as a whole. - Planned economy: The socialist stage involves the establishment of a planned economy, where production is organized based on social needs rather than profit motives. The allocation of resources and distribution of goods are determined through democratic decision-making processes, ensuring that the needs of society as a whole are prioritized. - Socialization of labor: In socialism, Marx envisioned the transformation of labor from individualized and alienated work under capitalism to socialized labor. This means that work becomes a collective endeavor, with workers collaborating and coordinating their efforts for the benefit of society as a whole. - Reduction of inequalities: While some inequalities may still exist during the socialist stage, Marx believed that they would gradually diminish as the class distinctions between the bourgeoisie and proletariat are dismantled. The aim is to create a more equitable society where wealth and resources are distributed more fairly. 3. Communism (Higher Stage of Communism): The final stage in Marx's vision is communism, also known as the higher stage of communism. In this stage, Marx envisioned a society without class divisions, private property, or the need for a state apparatus. Communism represents the ultimate goal, where the principle of "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs" is fully realized. Key changes in the communist stage include: - Abolition of class distinctions: In communism, there are no social classes, as the division between the bourgeoisie and proletariat is completely eradicated. All individuals are regarded as equal members of society, with no exploitation or oppression. - Stateless society: Marx envisioned the withering away of the state in communism. As class distinctions disappear and the need for coercion and control diminishes, the state apparatus becomes unnecessary. Instead, society is governed through voluntary cooperation and democratic decision-making processes. - Full abundance and free access: In communism, the productive forces of society are developed to such an extent that scarcity is eliminated. This allows for the principle of free access, where individuals can freely take what they need from the common pool of resources, without the need for exchange or monetary transactions. It is important to note that Marx did not provide a detailed blueprint for the transition from capitalism to communism, and he acknowledged that the specific path and timeline of this transition would depend on historical and material conditions. His analysis focused on the contradictions and dynamics of capitalist society, offering a theoretical framework for understanding and transforming it towards a more egalitarian and classless society.
Vidyaranya was guru of Harihar and Bukka Rai and his life was very similar to Chanakya and played very important role in establishing Vijaynagar empire.
Where does this interviewer come from?? He doesn't know what happened to/after Nupur Sharma??!! My 10yr old son was also asking about the details after seeing all the news reports and decades that had happened about this incident...then that killing of a poor tailor in Rajasthan for supporting her...
Bhai Babar kya tha, kisse bhaag raha tha, bisexual tha ya nahin, mujhe kya karna !!! Mere purvajon ko kyun mara.!!!??? He is just a demon from another World that's it.
bhai but jabhse humanity shuru hui hai, tabhse killing others for power has been the central piece in empires i understand babur was, lets just say exceptionally motivated by his own religion but, marna vagera toh power struggle mei hota hi hai thats what powerful people do isnt it? they do anything to gain control
I applaud Vinamre's effort, but I reckon Kushal, Arihant and Ajeet are better interviewers - they seem to have a better idea of what's going on in the world. I've noticed this in earlier interviews I've seen Vinamre do (eg the Rahul Shivshankar and Smita Prakash ones) where the follow-up questions left a fair bit to be desired (eg suggesting Vinamre was not as aware of Indian politics and history as I thought he would be, given that he managed to get such big names on his show). Even Ranveer comes across as a better interviewer than Vinamre.
Bbai the podcast was going so good yarr...bt the host kept on diverting concepts with his random questions with the impulsion to execute his preparation...jiski wajah se wo koi story complete hi nhi kr paya
ELites (saturnites). Rule of shanidev dats why worker class is in so much hype presently.. and art when came from left means what in Indian context name as shukrya charya
The seer you were talking of is "Swami Vidyaranya". He is the founder of modern day resistance for the Vedic, Sanatani or Hindu. The Rayas ruled in the name of Virupaksha. :)
1:06:03 complete wrong. Mongols did fought against each other in the Toluid Civil war, where Kublai Khan fought against his cousin Kaidu and his own brother Ariq.
Can listen to him to multiple topics and way he explained Marxism, communism, architecture, and also world history and way he connected the dots was engaging. Can listen to him for hours.
Please bring J Sai Deepak and Rajarshi Nandy to your podcast.... It will be a great experience for everyone. You will be able to create an amazing experience for the audience.
26:45 Centre of right or right of centre? Or obviously I've not heard this expression before. The expression is Centre-right? Which means slightly rightist. Centre of right would mean going left, leftist. How much left is left to your imagination. Anyway who's wrong here?
Hindu expansionism was to increase civilizational footprint not just trashy demographics. Even today GOI despite such misbehavior of Maldives is still not taking it to task but extending benevolence.
What is there about pain in Hindu philosophy? As per Krishna in the gIta, you strove to become a STHITHAPRAGYA - one whose senses are under her control and see both success or failure ( pleasure or pain) in an even fashion. This is the goal of the seeker.
अरे वो लोग करते थे तो वो सही थे अगर हम करने लगे तो गलत हो गए? मगर हम लोगों का तरीका अलग है। इन लोगों की वजह से देश का विभाजन हुआ था ये नहीं भूलना चाहिए।
23:56 Bro lives on some flat earth with his muslim friends. 14:52 - 16:08 Bro trying to garner sympathy and play dara hua card. 4:33 Savarkar ❌ Veer Savarkar ✅ Felt good and enlightening listening to Aabhash ji.
Aabhas Maldahiyar ji. "koi Guru"? the warrior saint Vidyaranya , reconverted Hakka Bkukka to sanatani . The founder of Hindu resistance. Shivaji simply followed Saint Vidyaranya. Ruled in the name of Virupaksha.
30k+ Muslims attended Sajid's last rites whereas hardly 300 attended Sir Kalam's. Actions speak louder than words! Counter me if you got no shame left.
What about other hindu gangster in UP....... How many hindus will be there in his rituals???? This is regional issue don't make it religious........ Just because you are from cow belt jahil Hindi states, doesn't mean others also have this communal hatred inbuilt
Dosnt this podcaster know anything abt Hindutva? He sympathizes with momins but believes Hindus are only tolerant in theory. He isn’t well read on topics abt Nupur or how much violence there is against ordinary Hindus or those who live as minority within communities but he knows all abt suppressed Muslims. He didn’t even read Karl Marx we read in school. So much attitude.
Savarkar used the term "Hindutva" (Sanskrit -tva, neuter abstract suffix) to describe "Hinduness" or the "quality of being a Hindu". Savarkar regarded Hinduism as an ethnic, cultural and political identity. Hindus, according to Savarkar, are those who consider India to be the land in which their ancestors lived, as well as the land in which their religion originated: "one for whom India is both Fatherland and Holyland" Hindutva has nothing to do with Religioucity.... Actually Hinduism is not religious it may have Religioucity like all karmaKand and rituals.... But it also has philosophies like Sankhya, Nyaya , vaisheshika Vedanta ..... Sankhya philosophy if you know is atheist philosophy in its original form.... Atheism is not blasphemy in Hindu Culture......
Although 1857 revolt was called First war of independence by Savarkar... Savarkar was not wrong and not right in calling it First war of Independence....Savarkar rathar smartly used it as hindu Muslim unity to fight more big power British......But in reality 1857 revolt was not first war independence....... actually moslems ullems through muslims soldiers of british army wanted to bring back mughal empire .....Bahadur shah zafar was puppet of those moslem rebels and ullems.... they also contact Ottomon empire and perisan empire...... *The Moslem rebels also slaughter British women and children because it was JIHAD declared by ullema against british...the moslem rebel also killed Christian missionaries and his wofe and daughter.....one of moslem rebel forces a married english and anglo english women to convert and marry them....... NanaSahib Peshwa was also like Savarkar.....he supported rebels against British...but also not wanted mugajl Empire to come again.....He directly wrote letter a british and fought them with hindu rebels.......they lost and NanaSaheb disappeared....went to nepal...some say SaiBaba...maybe died..... don't know........Rani LaxmiBai and Tantiya tope was fighting for their territory with NanaSaheb......Sikh refuse to join because Mughals would come again......since many british women and children were raped and killed...news reached britian and therefore they brutally killed rebels both by blowing to cannons......
@@willgetonepiecenot only NanaSahib Peshwa but Even Today Marathi people dreams of the empire..... So Moslems wanted Mughal Empire....Peshwa Rani Lakshmi Bai Tantiya tope wanted Maratha Empire....and interesting and intelligent and different character is Azimullah Khan....he was Vakil(lawyer) of NanaSahib Peshwa to Britain for Pension which British stop of Peshwa.....going to Britain he halt in present day turkey ottoman empire and aks help from them....he also brought with him I think a printing press.......someways he was acting on behave of Peshwa in many cases like he was the who order brutul murder of British women in Peshwa kothi(House )in Kanpur or near somewhere I am forgetting.....1857 is very very interesting topic actually.......There are lot of conspiracy involved which can changed India society.....any people were already starting to troll Nanashib Peshwa as dhondu Pant....he wanted to change that identity.....I have ready 1857 my friend......
I have stopped watching Vinamre as in many episodes I have noticed he is literally unaware of some recent big happenings.. for example here he doesn't know about the Nupur sharma case
Jabse is vinamra ne ek porn star ka pod cast Kiya tha aur extra marital affair, physical relationship ko sahi thahraya tha tab se ye insan pasand nahi hai aur aaj Puri duniya aur Bharat me isi mahine(ramadan) itne berahami se hinduon ka murder, rape kiya lekin isko wo bechare lagte Hain. Such a waste of time. I was here to listen to Abhash sir but listening to this host guy it feels he invites people of Indic faith only for views.
Bhai na main marxist hon na main communist hon pr iss ex-marxist se zda to mujhe pta ha marxism ar communism k barey main , ullu bna gya bhai understanding marxism k naam pr
You'll never understand Communism/Marxism if only read the dogma preached by its followers, you must need to understand ideological forefathers of Karl Marx, what ideology gave birth to it, what effect it have on society. Study it like a religion or cult. Listen to James Lindsey, Carl Benjamin to understand Communism/Marxism.
This so-called "self professed" Marxist has 0% idea of Marxism... Either he didn't read Marx or he didn't understand his works. One simple request, next time onwards as a litmus test, please ask anyone who claims to have read Marx to explain Dialectical Materialism, that's the core of Marxism. There's no harm in contradicting an idea but that must be done only if you've requisite knowledge on that idea!! Kudos to Vinarmra for asking relevant questions in defence.
Is it me or the Host was trying to make the so called minorities of this country look “BECHARA” .. like bhai before coming to your own podcast thoda toh news aur history vgera dekh le . Ab nupur bhi nhi pta .. do these type of people get blind or something when atrocities are done by the other group of so called afraid becharas
Sur you are genius....thanks to team for such a eye opener podcast.here in usa I work with Pakistanis who are proud of abdali....babar...... Only I can do after listening....nothing
Views badhane ke liye Islam to laana padega na meri jaan. Also the bloodshed that we talk about was happening across the globe even in the vijayanagar empire. Also destroying leftists is such an idiotic title. India lost against Afghanistan in football recently talk about it also for all those talking about sar tan se juda do find out the story behind the murder of Rajiv Dixit and Deen Dayal Upadhyay. And please come out of this historic narrative setting as it is not going to help you anywhere not even in your research part. Jo log yeh narrative build karne ki koshish kar rahe hai they are earning crores and we fools are busy writing comments (i am no exception in it).
Marx never supported colonialism. Marx shows the roadmap of transfer between feudalism to capitalistic traits. Marx also showed how Indian people get connected throgh trains and thus a movement take place. Lenin later redefined marx's theory and supports on third world countries suffering through colonialism and thus Vietnam , China , Combodia, Cuba revolution arises against the colonialism power
The guy is not aware that Ajanta Ellora paintings in dark caves were made before Mughals saw reflection. Whatever the the Mughal did or practiced in India was already present in India.
Yes ans why art disturb everything u will need to search where from art came. That thinking process when colaaborated wid worker class will generate hate so is happning.
Dear Abhas and Host please recheck the no of Muslim Generals with Shivaji Maharaj They were not Generals ...they were lay man and the no was 6...Only one Navy chief was there but he was also replaced after Kanhoji Angry ..... Shivaji Maharaj writes letter to his step brother Wyankoji Bhosle And says ...How you can win when You recruited turks in your Army....I will them
Hindutva is political ideology, based on abrahmic segregation from Indian subcontinent, deviating from territorial nationalism.. And casteism and superstition is part of orthodox sanatan according to arya samaj And brahminism according to ambedkar
It is true that vinamre is not aware of such a big issue and its ok to point that but cut the guy some slack, one can never know anything and everything, if he is indeed a good learner he would learn about it Why are we criticizing someone who is learning .
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Bhai Vinamr I can't believe that you really don't know what happened to Nupur Sharma.
Fake kar rha hai bhai really you would think he would not know yhe Or prakhar dono Greek philosopher ki gyaan chod they rhey they they would not know about this basic info lol
He is just pretending trying to appear intellectual and trying to position himself in that space. I feel he is faking the naiviety.
bro sometimes tooo political comments are bad when you are at a certain level
🤣Greek @@killuazoldyck3065
Santulan banakar rakhna hai bhai ko
22:59 How effortlessly Vinamra said, "Muh par toh bolte hain," but if the same were said about Muslims whether they are radicals and loyal to this nation, he'd nod vigorously and launch into a passionate defense, adding two more lines to their commendation. Now, that's what you call narrative! Hindus gets labeled as the castiest by default, while Muslims are painted as the Eternal Victims / BHATKE HUE LOG of this nation. Despite evidence to the contrary, it's become the accepted norm.
Bhai 72 firqe hain , ek dusre ko kafir bolte hain . Ek dusre ki masjido mein fat te hain bomb bandkar. Kabristan mein dafan nhi karne dete dead body ko , alag alag kabristan . But Hindus are castiest people . Bhai Jo dikhta hai sab sugercoated hai.
Or yeh baat aapki sahi hai ki moderate muslim ya liberal muslim jaisi koi chij nhi hai . Ya toh wo muslim hai ya phir wo nhi hai .
Great point made. Brilliant observation. Its a pleasure watching our generation becoming more aware and assertive
Leaving aside the Muslims who are obviously a danger to humanity, I can tell from my observation that Many of the Hindus are still casteist. Not to the level of untouchability (at least in urban areas) but I've had a Brahmin(by birth) friend who asked my surname before eating from my lunchbox. That day I felt so thankful that I could twll him proudly my surname (Singh implying that I'm not a so called low class after which he comfortably ate with me) which but suddenly it hit my mind, what if I was a so called SC? Many Hindus like me are against caste but many are covertly or overtly Casteist too But yes we have to change. And we will. let's accept our fault then only we can improve
@@R1TESH.absolutely true. It’s time the Hindu people get this in their heads. They can call us kafirs but can’t call them out for that , if we do than that will create a big hoopla and call us Islam aphrodisiacs!! Always a double standard!😡
Vinamar bhai trying hard to defend "peaceful community" but aabhas Bhai spitting facts
Vinamre doesn't even know about the murder of Kanhaiya Lal and 7 oyhers, how unfortunate is that.
He's shameless man how he is making. Baaber very. Good like. He was Angel I don't want to. Use. Bad word I am sikh and Hindu we are brothers and we love each other
As a sikh. Men I love my India l am Canadian citizen
Vinamra is the one biased left winger who has no knowlege of history or contemporary issue going on, still trying to be intellectual. Shame
@@harpreetcheema1297what about khalsa raaj and Khalistan?
The host is really unaware of current as well as historical facts... Amazing
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought this.
Who wants j sai deepak.
.Comment it.
💯
this dost cast, kushal and AIM type of ppl are trying to marginalized JSD.\
but JSD is too big to ignore.
No
Bring him on!
Bring him on!
Vinamre is so high that he doesn't know nupur sharma whole tragedy
And he wants to become a podcaster
Yes, I was also surprised that he didn't know about Nupur Sharma episode
This 1 hour 35 minutes has taught me more than 6 years of history classes ever could
Do podcast with India biggest Ex-Muslim!! That is "ExMuslim sahil". Bring him on the showww!!! Ex-Muslim Sahil!!!
Sahil ek converted Cristian hain jo funding leke kam karta hain against Hindu.agar koi muslim ke birodh bolega to gabar hindu usko sar pe chara ke rakha hain. Jake ke dekh back-end pe kya hota hain. Mera dost usko har din super chat deta tha. Ekdin usko messege pe bola sahilism pe ane ke jo bolta hain hindu ka sastra sab bekar hain, siva, krisna koi nahi hain but jessu hain. Matlab ek behen ke loda hi du o ko super chat lega and hindu god ko gali dega
True@@gargvanit
Bilkul bilkul ..ya hona chahiye...koi exmuslim nahi mil raha toh mujhse karlo
Call him
it is not a right wing hindutva hate podcast to bring him....if people from the right wing are making him their father...i dont know what else do i have to say!!!
Bhai ye monkey balancing ka keeda hinduon me hai hi.
Anchor is no exception. He is kushal mehra western learnt intellect brigade.
Kushal ki maakabharosa... That gandu thinks aryan invasion theory is true... That gandu looks like a South Indian who actually is a punjabi... B s d k.. Idhar hi clear ho jata hai ki... Hamare genetics ek hi hai... 😅
Kalma/Shahada/Azan which you hear daily from loudspeaker says
Ash-hadu alla ilaha illa Allah, wa ash-hadu anna anna Muhammadan Rasulullah”
I bear witness/ I give testimony that there is no god but God(Allah) and muhammed is his slave and Messenger.
This is foundation of islam if you know......This statement is completely political and you have to hear daily that there is no god other than Allah and muhammed is his only Messenger and slave.....shariyat goes then on say that if muhammed is slave of Allah....every person is slave of Allah.....and and job of a Muslim to convert every one muslim so that another Day of Judgement (akhirat) comes and we all go Jannah(heaven) and hell...
And there we get 72 virgins to enjoy....
Last five lines fake meaning
@@happy12boy which lines
@@happy12boy Non its true
Not being expansionist is actually counterproductive because when you don't have expansionist ambitions, people tend to find differences within and country breaks from within.. but when you are expansionist and entire country has a common enemy it becomes more stronger and United.
I would agree, but the way bharat expanded wasnt a warcry, rather it was rather a way of balance, to learn this we can look at our connections with other asian countries like china, burma, japan korea where not the people but the thoughts presented were accepted and exchanged too, indonesia malaysia sri lanka were all connected with bharat in one way or another equally accepting the other’s existence and importance.the war cry situation does seem to instill force in the common enemy but fails and get replled heavily at some point.
In Hinduism, there is no criticism. There are questions. In fact, the three central questions (who am I, where have I come from, where am I going) are the basis of Hinduism. In other religions, these three questions are forbidden. The answers are preset, and fed to the ‘believers’
How can se say this. How can we forget how upper castes so called Brahmins were hating and still hating lower castes. And Bhim Rao Ambedkar was a product of that friction.
Hinduism still has this problem inside their genes. 😢
@@prabh3010 This comment has nothing do with Caste system! What are you going on and on about?
Please invite j Sai Deepak please 🙏
💯
Everyone literally commenting the same thing😂😂 ...
Hi Vinamre, please invite J Sai Deepak on your podcast.
1)Nationalism started in India by Chtrapathi Shivaji Maharaj.... Hindavi Swarajya......all leaders from Maharashtra were nationalist.....Savarkar Carried the legacy forever.....Every other State lost to mughal at some point.... Aggressive Maratha resisted and won.......
Read Assam history....we were the only ones whom Mughal couldn't touch us. We were never doomed and even in times of Aurangzeb, 17 times we were attacked, but we resisted everytime. No doubt all respect to Shivaji Maharaj for he is the only one who could dream of independent Hindu Kingdom among Moghuls
@@ankurbaruah1046 we were never taught Ahom history in CBSE.....
There were several resistances @@EntropyInfo
Nationalism started from maurya empire inspired by acharya chanakya.
@@maratha8808 evidences and findings before 10th century are not clear and not present to large extent..... Therefore we cannot conclude any fact of Indian society before 10 century clearly.......we can just speculate.....
And now i can call myself a true history student as i already knew the fact that Babur didnt liked the his Mongol ancestory and thus not the word Mughal
As if timur was 😅very civilized .
You are completely wrong.
Karl Marx never wrote that everyone would have equal pay in a communist society. Karl Marx said that the more a person works, the more he gets paid. He wrote "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs".
A person who has read Karl Marx cannot make such a stupid mistake.
According to Karl Marx, the transition from capitalism to communism involves several significant political, social, and economic changes. Marx envisioned a series of stages that would ultimately lead to the establishment of a communist society, where the means of production are collectively owned and there is no private property or class distinctions. Let's explore the changes that Marx outlined for each stage in detail:
1. Capitalism: The starting point of Marx's analysis is capitalism, which he saw as characterized by private ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of labor. In this stage, the bourgeoisie, or capitalist class, owns and controls the means of production, while the proletariat, or working class, sells their labor power to survive. The capitalist mode of production is driven by profit and competition.
2. Socialism (Lower Stage of Communism): Marx proposed that the first transitional stage from capitalism to communism would be socialism, also referred to as the lower stage of communism. In this stage, the means of production are collectively owned and controlled by the working class, representing a shift away from private ownership. However, Marx acknowledged that certain elements of capitalism may still persist during this stage, such as the continued existence of wages and the principle of "to each according to their work." The main objective of socialism is to gradually eliminate class distinctions and lay the groundwork for a fully communist society.
During the socialist stage, Marx envisioned several key changes:
- Abolition of private property: Private ownership of the means of production is replaced by collective ownership. This means that factories, land, and other productive resources are no longer owned by individuals or capitalists but are instead owned and managed by the working class as a whole.
- Planned economy: The socialist stage involves the establishment of a planned economy, where production is organized based on social needs rather than profit motives. The allocation of resources and distribution of goods are determined through democratic decision-making processes, ensuring that the needs of society as a whole are prioritized.
- Socialization of labor: In socialism, Marx envisioned the transformation of labor from individualized and alienated work under capitalism to socialized labor. This means that work becomes a collective endeavor, with workers collaborating and coordinating their efforts for the benefit of society as a whole.
- Reduction of inequalities: While some inequalities may still exist during the socialist stage, Marx believed that they would gradually diminish as the class distinctions between the bourgeoisie and proletariat are dismantled. The aim is to create a more equitable society where wealth and resources are distributed more fairly.
3. Communism (Higher Stage of Communism): The final stage in Marx's vision is communism, also known as the higher stage of communism. In this stage, Marx envisioned a society without class divisions, private property, or the need for a state apparatus. Communism represents the ultimate goal, where the principle of "from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs" is fully realized.
Key changes in the communist stage include:
- Abolition of class distinctions: In communism, there are no social classes, as the division between the bourgeoisie and proletariat is completely eradicated. All individuals are regarded as equal members of society, with no exploitation or oppression.
- Stateless society: Marx envisioned the withering away of the state in communism. As class distinctions disappear and the need for coercion and control diminishes, the state apparatus becomes unnecessary. Instead, society is governed through voluntary cooperation and democratic decision-making processes.
- Full abundance and free access: In communism, the productive forces of society are developed to such an extent that scarcity is eliminated. This allows for the principle of free access, where individuals can freely take what they need from the common pool of resources, without the need for exchange or monetary transactions.
It is important to note that Marx did not provide a detailed blueprint for the transition from capitalism to communism, and he acknowledged that the specific path and timeline of this transition would depend on historical and material conditions. His analysis focused on the contradictions and dynamics of capitalist society, offering a theoretical framework for understanding and transforming it towards a more egalitarian and classless society.
Vidyaranya was guru of Harihar and Bukka Rai and his life was very similar to Chanakya and played very important role in establishing Vijaynagar empire.
Vinamre dont have Hindu tatva within him......Hindu tatav = material/realism of Hindu being = existence of being Hindu
Where does this interviewer come from?? He doesn't know what happened to/after Nupur Sharma??!! My 10yr old son was also asking about the details after seeing all the news reports and decades that had happened about this incident...then that killing of a poor tailor in Rajasthan for supporting her...
*Aare yea sab kahi na kahi I₹lamic sympathetic rog se grasth hai, isko nato history ki knowledge hai na kisi books ka*
Guy, why do you jump in so fast to defend certain peacefuls
Sikulaism 🎉🎉😅😅on top
I bet just like him...that no hesitation guy ranveer chudabadia also is not aware about the sar tan se juda wale julus
What a name😂😂😂😂
Who gives a fuck mohammad shami and Mohammad siraj toh Mera gala nahi kaatre na so all muslims good saaaarrr🥰🥰🥰🥰
Internet trollers 😅
Bhai Babar kya tha, kisse bhaag raha tha, bisexual tha ya nahin, mujhe kya karna !!! Mere purvajon ko kyun mara.!!!??? He is just a demon from another World that's it.
Itna simple nhi hai. To defeat the enemy you must know him first
bhai but jabhse humanity shuru hui hai, tabhse killing others for power has been the central piece in empires
i understand babur was, lets just say exceptionally motivated by his own religion
but, marna vagera toh power struggle mei hota hi hai
thats what powerful people do isnt it?
they do anything to gain control
@@gagadonim3354bhai wo 500 saal pehle marchuka heh 😂😂
@@aribirfan0786 uski soch nhi maari na. Tu kya chata hai aur ek babar paida ho aur aur 500 saal raj kare tabhi tu padhega?
@@gagadonim3354 filhal bs baber azam heh bhai 😂
Pls bring part 2 . Amazing podcast . So much enlightenment
Hindus get United and save our civilization values and culture.
I applaud Vinamre's effort, but I reckon Kushal, Arihant and Ajeet are better interviewers - they seem to have a better idea of what's going on in the world. I've noticed this in earlier interviews I've seen Vinamre do (eg the Rahul Shivshankar and Smita Prakash ones) where the follow-up questions left a fair bit to be desired (eg suggesting Vinamre was not as aware of Indian politics and history as I thought he would be, given that he managed to get such big names on his show). Even Ranveer comes across as a better interviewer than Vinamre.
bring Ex Muslim Sahil as Guest 👍👌💪🙏
Bbai the podcast was going so good yarr...bt the host kept on diverting concepts with his random questions with the impulsion to execute his preparation...jiski wajah se wo koi story complete hi nhi kr paya
ELites (saturnites). Rule of shanidev dats why worker class is in so much hype presently.. and art when came from left means what in Indian context name as shukrya charya
The seer you were talking of is "Swami Vidyaranya". He is the founder of modern day resistance for the Vedic, Sanatani or Hindu. The Rayas ruled in the name of Virupaksha. :)
At around ~16 minutes Dhimmism kicks in !
1:06:03 complete wrong. Mongols did fought against each other in the Toluid Civil war, where Kublai Khan fought against his cousin Kaidu and his own brother Ariq.
Abhas Bhai is awesome, thanks vinamre you rock ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Such an interesting conversation. I sometime feel that we learn history better from people who are non historians.
Isn't aware of Sar Tan se Juda episode??? Makes me label you the newest LIBRANDU!!
Can listen to him to multiple topics and way he explained Marxism, communism, architecture, and also world history and way he connected the dots was engaging. Can listen to him for hours.
Please bring J Sai Deepak and Rajarshi Nandy to your podcast.... It will be a great experience for everyone. You will be able to create an amazing experience for the audience.
Mast podcast, easy to understand and learnt many new things
The answer to question of muslims feeling insecure and what should they do was best answered by Sai deepak sir in the ranveer show
26:45 Centre of right or right of centre? Or obviously I've not heard this expression before.
The expression is Centre-right? Which means slightly rightist. Centre of right would mean going left, leftist. How much left is left to your imagination. Anyway who's wrong here?
Hindu expansionism was to increase civilizational footprint not just trashy demographics. Even today GOI despite such misbehavior of Maldives is still not taking it to task but extending benevolence.
Humayun fell and died from the Steps of his Library at Purana Qila. Delhi.
Akbar died of Diarrhea 🤣
Yes
ऐसे लोगो को मंच देने के लिए बहुत धन्यवाद ।
You should explore more on abhas's pov on marxism...that was interesting and please dont question random thing in between stay on topic
Abhas has written a historical book on Babar and that is the primary driver if the podcast
What is there about pain in Hindu philosophy? As per Krishna in the gIta, you strove to become a STHITHAPRAGYA - one whose senses are under her control and see both success or failure ( pleasure or pain) in an even fashion.
This is the goal of the seeker.
J Sai Deepak, Adam Seeker, ExMuslim Sahil!
अरे वो लोग करते थे तो वो सही थे अगर हम करने लगे तो गलत हो गए? मगर हम लोगों का तरीका अलग है।
इन लोगों की वजह से देश का विभाजन हुआ था ये नहीं भूलना चाहिए।
Turkish born nun who worked for decades with persecuted Christians and Yazidis in the Middle East, Sister Hatune Dogan:
“ISIS is Islam, Islam is ISIS”
Such a quick jump in advocating for the special community people
23:56 Bro lives on some flat earth with his muslim friends.
14:52 - 16:08 Bro trying to garner sympathy and play dara hua card.
4:33 Savarkar ❌ Veer Savarkar ✅
Felt good and enlightening listening to Aabhash ji.
Veer, my foot😂
Aabhas Maldahiyar ji. "koi Guru"? the warrior saint Vidyaranya , reconverted Hakka Bkukka to sanatani . The founder of Hindu resistance. Shivaji simply followed Saint Vidyaranya. Ruled in the name of Virupaksha.
30k+ Muslims attended Sajid's last rites whereas hardly 300 attended Sir Kalam's. Actions speak louder than words! Counter me if you got no shame left.
What about other hindu gangster in UP.......
How many hindus will be there in his rituals????
This is regional issue don't make it religious........
Just because you are from cow belt jahil Hindi states, doesn't mean others also have this communal hatred inbuilt
@@nikhildeshmukh6221 Ginke batana zara kitne gaye bkl. Fuck your regional issue, this is an issue against humanity itself!
Why are u not aware of nupur case ?
Dosnt this podcaster know anything abt Hindutva? He sympathizes with momins but believes Hindus are only tolerant in theory. He isn’t well read on topics abt Nupur or how much violence there is against ordinary Hindus or those who live as minority within communities but he knows all abt suppressed Muslims.
He didn’t even read Karl Marx we read in school. So much attitude.
Savarkar used the term "Hindutva" (Sanskrit -tva, neuter abstract suffix) to describe "Hinduness" or the "quality of being a Hindu". Savarkar regarded Hinduism as an ethnic, cultural and political identity. Hindus, according to Savarkar, are those who consider India to be the land in which their ancestors lived, as well as the land in which their religion originated: "one for whom India is both Fatherland and Holyland"
Hindutva has nothing to do with Religioucity....
Actually Hinduism is not religious it may have Religioucity like all karmaKand and rituals....
But it also has philosophies like Sankhya, Nyaya , vaisheshika Vedanta .....
Sankhya philosophy if you know is atheist philosophy in its original form....
Atheism is not blasphemy in Hindu Culture......
Kafir is the word used only to address the non muslim persons, it doesn't mean to hate them.
बहुत शानदार चर्चा।
Although 1857 revolt was called First war of independence by Savarkar... Savarkar was not wrong and not right in calling it First war of Independence....Savarkar rathar smartly used it as hindu Muslim unity to fight more big power British......But in reality 1857 revolt was not first war independence....... actually moslems ullems through muslims soldiers of british army wanted to bring back mughal empire .....Bahadur shah zafar was puppet of those moslem rebels and ullems.... they also contact Ottomon empire and perisan empire......
*The Moslem rebels also slaughter British women and children because it was JIHAD declared by ullema against british...the moslem rebel also killed Christian missionaries and his wofe and daughter.....one of moslem rebel forces a married english and anglo english women to convert and marry them.......
NanaSahib Peshwa was also like Savarkar.....he supported rebels against British...but also not wanted mugajl Empire to come again.....He directly wrote letter a british and fought them with hindu rebels.......they lost and NanaSaheb disappeared....went to nepal...some say SaiBaba...maybe died..... don't know........Rani LaxmiBai and Tantiya tope was fighting for their territory with NanaSaheb......Sikh refuse to join because Mughals would come again......since many british women and children were raped and killed...news reached britian and therefore they brutally killed rebels both by blowing to cannons......
People evolve..
Hi please read the book war of independence 1857 to know the history it was peshwa ji who wanted to establish Maratha Empire back
@@willgetonepiecenot only NanaSahib Peshwa but Even Today Marathi people dreams of the empire.....
So Moslems wanted Mughal Empire....Peshwa Rani Lakshmi Bai Tantiya tope wanted Maratha Empire....and interesting and intelligent and different character is Azimullah Khan....he was Vakil(lawyer) of NanaSahib Peshwa to Britain for Pension which British stop of Peshwa.....going to Britain he halt in present day turkey ottoman empire and aks help from them....he also brought with him I think a printing press.......someways he was acting on behave of Peshwa in many cases like he was the who order brutul murder of British women in Peshwa kothi(House )in Kanpur or near somewhere I am forgetting.....1857 is very very interesting topic actually.......There are lot of conspiracy involved which can changed India society.....any people were already starting to troll Nanashib Peshwa as dhondu Pant....he wanted to change that identity.....I have ready 1857 my friend......
I have stopped watching Vinamre as in many episodes I have noticed he is literally unaware of some recent big happenings.. for example here he doesn't know about the Nupur sharma case
1:22:39 khubsurat jawan ladke 🥳
Babur didn't even control modern day Uzbekistan though. He was defeated by the Uzbek khanate and fled to kabul from Fergana.
Nothing just a same ncert glorification of mughals.... Bhai indian minds were working with them did u got it
Fascinating ❤❤
Finally we get to read some true, unbiased history.
Really enjoyed this podcast. You really do bring out the best in some of these 'right wing' intellectuals.
Jabse is vinamra ne ek porn star ka pod cast Kiya tha aur extra marital affair, physical relationship ko sahi thahraya tha tab se ye insan pasand nahi hai aur aaj Puri duniya aur Bharat me isi mahine(ramadan) itne berahami se hinduon ka murder, rape kiya lekin isko wo bechare lagte Hain. Such a waste of time. I was here to listen to Abhash sir but listening to this host guy it feels he invites people of Indic faith only for views.
Bhai na main marxist hon na main communist hon pr iss ex-marxist se zda to mujhe pta ha marxism ar communism k barey main , ullu bna gya bhai understanding marxism k naam pr
You'll never understand Communism/Marxism if only read the dogma preached by its followers, you must need to understand ideological forefathers of Karl Marx, what ideology gave birth to it, what effect it have on society. Study it like a religion or cult.
Listen to James Lindsey, Carl Benjamin to understand Communism/Marxism.
Very nice content❤
Superb❤
I think it's a Lamy Safari that Aabhas is holding in his hand. Please correct me if I am wrong.
New and interesting point of views.
Too good and so much knowledge
Vinamre please listen in to the guest than interjecting in between with your talk . Please just listen in 🙏🏾
This so-called "self professed" Marxist has 0% idea of Marxism... Either he didn't read Marx or he didn't understand his works. One simple request, next time onwards as a litmus test, please ask anyone who claims to have read Marx to explain Dialectical Materialism, that's the core of Marxism. There's no harm in contradicting an idea but that must be done only if you've requisite knowledge on that idea!! Kudos to Vinarmra for asking relevant questions in defence.
vinamre bhai can u tell something about the art piece in guest's background?
I am here for Aabhas ji, the host is Hollow and superficial.
Pls invite Mr. Ankit Shah. He's really popular these days.
Host ke hisab sa minority dara hua hai bharat ma
Jab ki "sar tan sa juda " hindu ke verodh ma lagaya jata hai hindu ke hi des ma
Is it me or the Host was trying to make the so called minorities of this country look “BECHARA” .. like bhai before coming to your own podcast thoda toh news aur history vgera dekh le . Ab nupur bhi nhi pta .. do these type of people get blind or something when atrocities are done by the other group of so called afraid becharas
Sur you are genius....thanks to team for such a eye opener podcast.here in usa I work with Pakistanis who are proud of abdali....babar......
Only I can do after listening....nothing
Views badhane ke liye Islam to laana padega na meri jaan. Also the bloodshed that we talk about was happening across the globe even in the vijayanagar empire. Also destroying leftists is such an idiotic title. India lost against Afghanistan in football recently talk about it also for all those talking about sar tan se juda do find out the story behind the murder of Rajiv Dixit and Deen Dayal Upadhyay.
And please come out of this historic narrative setting as it is not going to help you anywhere not even in your research part. Jo log yeh narrative build karne ki koshish kar rahe hai they are earning crores and we fools are busy writing comments (i am no exception in it).
Please invite Praveen mohan sir
If you are saying muslims criticize their philosophy then why there is blasphemy law?
Tengrisim isn't a part of Buddhist religion, it's a pagan religion, try to have some home work
Marx never supported colonialism. Marx shows the roadmap of transfer between feudalism to capitalistic traits. Marx also showed how Indian people get connected throgh trains and thus a movement take place.
Lenin later redefined marx's theory and supports on third world countries suffering through colonialism and thus Vietnam , China , Combodia, Cuba revolution arises against the colonialism power
Marx supported colonization of India
Bhai aap india hi rente ho ? aapko ' sar tan se juda ' k barei mai nhi pta ? Akbar pdha likha nhi tha Ye toh Jodha Akbar mai bhi hai
The guy is not aware that Ajanta Ellora paintings in dark caves were made before Mughals saw reflection. Whatever the the Mughal did or practiced in India was already present in India.
Yes ans why art disturb everything u will need to search where from art came. That thinking process when colaaborated wid worker class will generate hate so is happning.
Bhai kabhi sanjay dixit ji ko invite karna .. Jaipur dialogue se gyan ki bhandar hai sanjay ji .. 3 sal se follow kartaa hun unko ...
@26:40 Right of center. Not center of right.
he is very underrated but he have very deep way of thoughta
Dear Abhas and Host please recheck the no of Muslim Generals with Shivaji Maharaj
They were not Generals ...they were lay man and the no was 6...Only one Navy chief was there but he was also replaced after Kanhoji Angry .....
Shivaji Maharaj writes letter to his step brother Wyankoji Bhosle
And says ...How you can win when You recruited turks in your Army....I will them
It was not khilafat - it was khalifa/caliphate - Ottoman Empire- newly converted Bharathiya Muslims wanted to join that empire after British leave
Call sandeep balakrishan and exmuslim sameer
Search where from elite EL ites word came.. and u will find why is hate between worker class and eastablishment increasing
Hindutva is political ideology, based on abrahmic segregation from Indian subcontinent, deviating from territorial nationalism..
And casteism and superstition is part of orthodox sanatan according to arya samaj
And brahminism according to ambedkar
Dyslexia was reason behind Akbar being illeterate.
It is true that vinamre is not aware of such a big issue and its ok to point that but cut the guy some slack, one can never know anything and everything, if he is indeed a good learner he would learn about it
Why are we criticizing someone who is learning .
so sad that vinamra dont know about nupur