The fact that a game so complex and mathematical has living embodiments of the "one shared neuron" meme as protagonists shows that anything is possible
If I remember straight, kerbals canonically learn things almost always through trial and error. MUCH, trial and error So, yknow, infinite monkey theory
Did something similar. Crash landed one kerbal on Eve. Send over surface scanning satellites to find the highest spot on eve in range. Send over a vehicle to drive him there. Vehicle breaks, send over 9 ton reinforced vehicle over - it worked. Created a refuling and mining operation on Gilly. Because i didnt teleport stuff all my ascend stages had to be flown over to Eve and testet there. Lot was easier because Mechjeb but it took months (in realtime) to get a working rocket. My ascending stage was smaller but way wider with asparagus staging. The final stage was just a small engine with a small fuel tank and a seat. It barely managed to get into orbit. Eve orbit and surface was littered with remains of failed attempts. It was awesome!
Btw if you are not sure if something is broken on the rocket you can press F3 and it will tell you everything that happened during the launch like broken parts
"Nothing would have changed about the rocket except that it would have worked" That, my friend, is changing LITERALLY EVERYTHING a++ content, love your KSS stuff
Also: it seems you used a mod to get rid of the parachutes, and this is why you were disatisfied about it, but you can totally attach and remove parts in the stock game if you have an engineer, just click on the crane symbol on the right when on EVA
3:38 reminds me of a time i did some "part clipping" with a 1-to-3 adapter, BUT when i triggered the stage separators, the overlapping parts exploded, and a PIECE of one damaged one of my upper-stage engines!
Surprised that a game that is so “gentle” with Kerbals doesn’t give them a off-Kerbin limited life expectancy. Shoutouts to the 500 year old Kerbal who went to Eeloo.
A way to avoid cheats at all would be to remove the ladders and parachutes with an engineer kerbal on Eve, and for the ladder issue, flying above the ascent vehicle, jumping off the plane, deploying the EVA chute and landing on top of the ascent vehicle (or grabbing the ladder in flight)
Try moving your SRB couplers past the center of gravity of the empty booster. That will help them fall away from the rocket, instead of rolling in toward it
Only just found your channel. Had given up on KSP videos, as I was not interested in 30 minute diatribes in a pretentious voice about qhwiskey and other non-KSP stuff. You're the man. Thank you.
1:22 yes I know solids are suppose to be super good in the atmosphere but when looking at efficiency curves I was shocked the srbs denature at just 6atm. Mammoth are better at 12atm
Removes literally a ton of spent parachutes on the Eve ascent vehicle. "Oh, now I'm having more dv to get into orbit...." Oh, did you try out a helicopter stage for your ascent vehicle? Saves a lot of tonnage and makes you independent of landing height.
I have one rite now in Low Kerbin Orbit cuz i put Jeb up there without considerin how to get him down xD And if it were any Kerbin but Jeb, i wudnt care, but i gotta bring Jeb back.
Maybe do a grand tour! A lot of other KSP youtubers do that, and you are definiteley skilled enough. (a grand tour is a mission that lands on every body and returns)
You opted for the aerobrake approach which is better in some ways than a real heat shield, Eve atmo is so thick that the ship will be pushed to go sideways ans burn if it is elongated. The aerobrake makes the ship act as a dart and stays stable. For other ships or rovers that have irregular shapes, I prefer to build a custom shield on the side that will act as a belly for reentry, Space Shuttle style, it works like a charm, you still have to add some weight in it to make sure the CoM points in the direction of the shield. The other way to ensure a safe Eve reentry is to add a deceleration stage to prevent the ship from burning. (you can add a bottom to the return vessel that will act as entry for Kerbals and launch platform with adjustable landing legs for leveling the thing on rough terrain, the bottom having a large docking port to be docked at first with a transfer/deceleration stage, allowing you to launch the mission in several takes from Kerbin as you did. That way you are not forced to build a very brutal launch system from Kerbin in the first place and nuclear transfer stage can take charge for Kerbin-Eve transfer. One thing is sure, Eve is THE FINAL boss, at least for a a surface crewed mission, the other missions are very easy, small payloads are very easy to manage with a proper aeroshell and heatshield or a belly shield.
You should work on improving your gravity turn to increase fuel efficiency. The more time you spend burning up is fuel spent on fighting directly against gravity, essentially wasting fuel, what you want to do instead is burn straight up until you get out of the thickest atmosphere, which isn't that high, and gradually start dipping the rocket into a horizontal position, you should be completely horizontal before you even leave the atmosphere.
You seem to be conflating drag and gravity - gravity takes very long distances to significantly lower its effect, while the atmosphere very quickly lowers in thickness. But the end result is the same lol
@@Roach18 I built a lander from a fuel tank, the mk1 module, rover wheels, terrier engine, lander struts and a TON of solar panels. It's really not that hard. The hard part, when you make it all the way there, travel around, find a moon rock and then it tells you the mk1 can't hold mun rocks. So logically, you jump in and out 15 times grabbing more moon rocks just to make sure there isn't some secret method... NOPE
Learning is the toughest part. You fail, fail fail fail and fail... then finally success!!!!.... oh wait no, I blew up on landing. Eventually, it becomes easy
Darnet! I hate when you have to scrap footage cause there’s so many good things in some of it! And the problem is, if you did a part two, you probably would get less traffic because there’s just so much to watch and it’s too thorough. But it would be interesting to me so you just got to have the right audience
You know, he's gonna all over the Kerbol System. What's next? Going to another system. The system mods I recommend are the Vulture system or the Event Horizon system. I would also recommend a time warp mod, cause these systems are far away.
more context: it's a sort of basic flight log but the main thing the f3 menu does is just show you a list of every part that blew up also Aerodynamics is kinda important, not hugely but still you want to have aerodynamic rockets, and the way it works in KSP, is that the more slopped in the front it is, the better and you need to have all the width of a rocket (the cross section to the airstream) be in front of a cone, to do that, just make sure that none of the attachement nodes (the green balls in the editor) are empty, make sure that all of them have something attached to them, and make sure that it's something pointy if those nodes are facing towards where you are going if you have a large fuel tank, put a slanted adapter, then a nose cone, KSP doesn't do proper aerodynamics, but it does read the front face of any part, then gives it drag, linear to how large it is, and squared to how flat it is if, however, there is a part that is attached to the node, and the same size (important!), then the drag value for that part in the front will be ZERO!!!! so to recap for KSP aerodynamics, always have stuff as slanted as possible towards the front, even if it looks silly (or just sacrifice efficiency for aesthetics, that's fine too), then make sure that there is no green node that is facing towards the front with nothing attached, if there is, cover it up with a nosecone, or conical fuel tank, and if it's too large for any nose cone, put adapters that make the front narrower and narrower until a nosecone can fit
for your Eve getaway rocket, you actually did a very good job as far as KSP is concerned for aerodynamics, you had every node attached to something, there never was a flat surface towards the front, and it all expanded from smaller nodes for example, the way you did it, with a 1.25m splitter that creates 2 nodes, then slowly working your way up from those two 1.25m nodes to the big 3.75m nodes is EXACTLY what KSP wants, so your rocket was very aerodynamic, even if it looked silly and had tanks clipping into each other, as far as the aerodynamics of the game you did a good job (which matters a lot on Eve with it's huge atmopshere)
Hey theres a game thats really fun and complex but you can build basically anything in it. It's called from the depths and it would really fit in well with the games u play since they are sandboxy/building focused
I have a 1st stage rocket that would have no issues putting this thing in orbit because it has enough Dv to put itself on a kerbin escape and is capable of a max thrust of over 140k kn. To put in perspective it can place a 500k weight unit object in kerbin orbit without a second stage and has no issues lifting such a load. This all comes at a pretty hefty cost, so sadly not viable for money careers as it is insanely expensive.
I want to see you Dock to a Space ship, thats Flying really fast and is in a Nonsensical Rotation Pattern and in a Northern and southpole Eliptic Orbit above Kerbin, but before you send a Trip over there to catch and recover that space ship, you need to get data from the mun surface and land on kerbin to deliver the sample to a rover and then you can begin to recover the Space ship, then land safely on kerbin with it... You need to have all the fuel to do this in 1 go (Multiple Refuel rockets are fine) you can't use rcs only the worst Reaction wheels because you are in the early state of Spaceflight, You can use all fuel tanks and Engines from before 4 tier of the research tree you'r choice if you wanna make it a bit easier or make it more hellish.
Is it possible to make a tour of the system starship that is capable of visiting every location in the game, colkecting a 100% catalogue of all discoveries across the entire game? Asking for future KSP2 players.
I love how youre doin all this and im over here feelin like a toddler playin with blocks cuz im unable to figure out what to do to get Jeb back from Low Kerbin Orbit xD I am doin it in the mission syyle tho (i need objectives and goals lol) but im also play on super easy mode cuz i made it easier than the easiest settings But all that does is mean money is no object for the most part... And i can get science easier to get the parts i need. Still, i dont think i have a chance to just like dock with the ship i left up there cuz ofc it doesnt have such... So im thinkin im gonna just have to figure out how to get next to it and give it a push i guess
@@wisdomofnotch (Also, thanks! Gonna try do this later today) Now that ya say it, duh xD Tho... Wait, i mite have to bring him an EVA suit or somethin. I think i sent him up into orbit before i had those cuz i remember bein annoyed i cudnt take him out like i wanted to do xD Tho hopefully the upgrade worked on him too I am sad i dont get to shove Jeb out of LKO tho :P
Definitly more complicated, but can't you send a refueling ship up with an engineer? Add on ports and dock so you can transfer fuel and then Deorbit? I may be wrong though so if a ksp expert wants to correct me do so!
@@alexparadise6121 The other persons idea sounds much simpler heh, as is im gonna be havin a hard enuf time figurin out how to get into the same orbit to even bring a ship for Jeb to hop onto; let alone figurin out refuelin xD Tho that wud be the cooler way to do it ofc, but then i feel id just hop over to Jeb and use the fuel to go further out into orbit just cuz i got more fuel to do it now :P
Hey i really like your vids but i have to give you one little tip ;) While listening to your explainations its hard to listen to you, cause you talk without any pause... you would to it in real life too right? So just speak slower and/ or get more breaks in so its way nicer to listen to you Anyways go on and make those great videos
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
I think I'm never doing another Eve rescue but it was fun once lol. What else do you want to see?
Go to moho and back
@Evelyn Edmeier rip
I like moho
Now can you go to eeloo with spark engines?
this isnt an answere but how do you upload so often at such a high quallity?
Imagine being stuck on eve for many many years and then hearing that the rocket coming to save you isn't "half bad" lmao
Poor guys
Only for the rocket to run out of deltaV and end up back on the surface 🤣
@@Teh_Random_Canadian LMFAO
In true Kerbin fashion “Isn’t half bad.” probably vaguely translates to “best in the fleet”
@@Teh_Random_Canadian waltuh
The fact that a game so complex and mathematical has living embodiments of the "one shared neuron" meme as protagonists shows that anything is possible
Yep
Hmm, kinda sketchy username. I don't think that friendliness is completely genuine
Except in reality, which is all that matters
fancy words😊
If I remember straight, kerbals canonically learn things almost always through trial and error. MUCH, trial and error
So, yknow, infinite monkey theory
I think the parachutes may have messed with the aerodynamics, probably causing slightly more drag which matters on Eve.
Potentially, I wouldn't be surprised
@@ReidCaptain at some point simulation was changed such that drag and weight of small parts is simply added to larger parts too, i believe
@@ebinmemes2298 yes his heading changed which cut the boost he would have got from the rotation of the planet.
those parachutes are heavy! If you check the video the delta-v went from 4691 to 5280 after they were removed
@@ebinmemes2298 that was quite a while ago to fix the tony probe exploit, right?
Did something similar. Crash landed one kerbal on Eve. Send over surface scanning satellites to find the highest spot on eve in range. Send over a vehicle to drive him there. Vehicle breaks, send over 9 ton reinforced vehicle over - it worked. Created a refuling and mining operation on Gilly. Because i didnt teleport stuff all my ascend stages had to be flown over to Eve and testet there. Lot was easier because Mechjeb but it took months (in realtime) to get a working rocket. My ascending stage was smaller but way wider with asparagus staging. The final stage was just a small engine with a small fuel tank and a seat. It barely managed to get into orbit. Eve orbit and surface was littered with remains of failed attempts. It was awesome!
Btw if you are not sure if something is broken on the rocket you can press F3 and it will tell you everything that happened during the launch like broken parts
You could also just use Alt F4 to show the health of the parts
@@Espartanica thanks I will try that :D
Imagine waiting multiple years to get rescued from another planet, seeing that the rocket bringing you back finally landed... Only for it to tip over.
"Nothing would have changed about the rocket except that it would have worked"
That, my friend, is changing LITERALLY EVERYTHING
a++ content, love your KSS stuff
Those kerbals are in "good" hands!
We are not liable for any damages,bodily harm, and "disassembling"
let's just say the hands their in, not "half bad"
1:28 "I also had some minor stability issues" *proceeds to turn upside down*
You gotta know that those kerbals would be able to jump like 3X higher on kerbin now, after spending 47 years on eve!
Also: it seems you used a mod to get rid of the parachutes, and this is why you were disatisfied about it, but you can totally attach and remove parts in the stock game if you have an engineer, just click on the crane symbol on the right when on EVA
3:38 reminds me of a time i did some "part clipping" with a 1-to-3 adapter, BUT when i triggered the stage separators, the overlapping parts exploded, and a PIECE of one damaged one of my upper-stage engines!
"I replaced the engine with a slightly more powerful one" replaces it with an engine that was probably 10x more powerful
Keep it up. Loving the content!
Surprised that a game that is so “gentle” with Kerbals doesn’t give them a off-Kerbin limited life expectancy. Shoutouts to the 500 year old Kerbal who went to Eeloo.
So cool. Always love your work.
Appreciate it!
Nice, you improved at ksp in a way I never expected. Good job!
You did great this mission is really hard, good job 👍
A way to avoid cheats at all would be to remove the ladders and parachutes with an engineer kerbal on Eve, and for the ladder issue, flying above the ascent vehicle, jumping off the plane, deploying the EVA chute and landing on top of the ascent vehicle (or grabbing the ladder in flight)
This was amazing. So much effort put in. Great job, man!! :D
Try moving your SRB couplers past the center of gravity of the empty booster. That will help them fall away from the rocket, instead of rolling in toward it
Only just found your channel. Had given up on KSP videos, as I was not interested in 30 minute diatribes in a pretentious voice about qhwiskey and other non-KSP stuff. You're the man. Thank you.
keep up the good work we love you reid!
1:22 yes I know solids are suppose to be super good in the atmosphere but when looking at efficiency curves I was shocked the srbs denature at just 6atm. Mammoth are better at 12atm
Removes literally a ton of spent parachutes on the Eve ascent vehicle.
"Oh, now I'm having more dv to get into orbit...."
Oh, did you try out a helicopter stage for your ascent vehicle? Saves a lot of tonnage and makes you independent of landing height.
I hope to see you play simple rockets 2 someday
You care more about your Kerbals than I do... I still have a ton in some old space station that have been there for centuries
I have one rite now in Low Kerbin Orbit cuz i put Jeb up there without considerin how to get him down xD And if it were any Kerbin but Jeb, i wudnt care, but i gotta bring Jeb back.
LET US OUT ROYAL
Never forgot the moment I thought you left one for dead lmao
Wheatley omg!
Rescue missions are the best part about KSP
Ehhhh… I think bases are cooler
"A little heated." he said, as his spacecraft nearly set on fire.
Maybe do a grand tour! A lot of other KSP youtubers do that, and you are definiteley skilled enough. (a grand tour is a mission that lands on every body and returns)
The whole rocket explodes. Him: Some minor problems.
Great video man, glad the Kerbals are safe
But they will never ever trust his designs ever again.
You opted for the aerobrake approach which is better in some ways than a real heat shield, Eve atmo is so thick that the ship will be pushed to go sideways ans burn if it is elongated. The aerobrake makes the ship act as a dart and stays stable. For other ships or rovers that have irregular shapes, I prefer to build a custom shield on the side that will act as a belly for reentry, Space Shuttle style, it works like a charm, you still have to add some weight in it to make sure the CoM points in the direction of the shield.
The other way to ensure a safe Eve reentry is to add a deceleration stage to prevent the ship from burning. (you can add a bottom to the return vessel that will act as entry for Kerbals and launch platform with adjustable landing legs for leveling the thing on rough terrain, the bottom having a large docking port to be docked at first with a transfer/deceleration stage, allowing you to launch the mission in several takes from Kerbin as you did. That way you are not forced to build a very brutal launch system from Kerbin in the first place and nuclear transfer stage can take charge for Kerbin-Eve transfer.
One thing is sure, Eve is THE FINAL boss, at least for a a surface crewed mission, the other missions are very easy, small payloads are very easy to manage with a proper aeroshell and heatshield or a belly shield.
Always Valentina getting stuck in weird places
For an eve ship just stick with the 1 m and 1.5 m parts, the large parts aren’t beneficial
1.8m*
I happen to notice that a lot of your creations are horrific
agree
You should work on improving your gravity turn to increase fuel efficiency. The more time you spend burning up is fuel spent on fighting directly against gravity, essentially wasting fuel, what you want to do instead is burn straight up until you get out of the thickest atmosphere, which isn't that high, and gradually start dipping the rocket into a horizontal position, you should be completely horizontal before you even leave the atmosphere.
You seem to be conflating drag and gravity - gravity takes very long distances to significantly lower its effect, while the atmosphere very quickly lowers in thickness. But the end result is the same lol
@@DoruminNah it‘s way more efficient if you turn at 10km.
OH, MY, GOD! I CANT EVEN GET TO THE MUN AND YOURE DOING THIS
You’ll get there
I got to the Mun, but my Engine broke when i hit the ground at 17m/s, i guess im stuck.
@@Roach18 I built a lander from a fuel tank, the mk1 module, rover wheels, terrier engine, lander struts and a TON of solar panels. It's really not that hard. The hard part, when you make it all the way there, travel around, find a moon rock and then it tells you the mk1 can't hold mun rocks. So logically, you jump in and out 15 times grabbing more moon rocks just to make sure there isn't some secret method... NOPE
people who play games like this must have galaxy brains. I understood nothing, but I'm glad you succeeded
Learning is the toughest part. You fail, fail fail fail and fail... then finally success!!!!.... oh wait no, I blew up on landing.
Eventually, it becomes easy
didn't know you needed all that to land on eve lol. I did it with a munar lander and one regular heat shield
But was your lander capable of getting off of Eve and into a stable orbit? Anybody can land on a planet, the hard part is getting back off it 😊
Quite a few would be an understatement.
Darnet! I hate when you have to scrap footage cause there’s so many good things in some of it! And the problem is, if you did a part two, you probably would get less traffic because there’s just so much to watch and it’s too thorough. But it would be interesting to me so you just got to have the right audience
Weird, I just watched part 1 this morning. I'm a recent sub so I've been picking through the backlog and just happened to land on that one.
Do you know about asparagus staging? I think this would help you get things into orbit instead of adding so many solid rocket boosters!
As a Juno: New Origins player, I can confirm this is a normal Tuesday
You know, he's gonna all over the Kerbol System. What's next? Going to another system. The system mods I recommend are the Vulture system or the Event Horizon system. I would also recommend a time warp mod, cause these systems are far away.
I might check those out, definitely want practice for ksp2
@@ReidCaptain ksp2 is gonna be sweet. its like ksp1 but with mods.
@@GoodBoy-sj2rqmoments before desaster
You should have done service bays with seats for max efficiency
the kerbals: finally a good f&%$£ing rescue
a good enough rescue
13:28 “Caused some minor problems.”
Casually makes a rocket with a floating stage. :)
When are we getting a sun rescue mission???
Right after the Jool rescue mission
just a tip for ksp: press f3 to show what got blown up
more context: it's a sort of basic flight log but the main thing the f3 menu does is just show you a list of every part that blew up
also Aerodynamics is kinda important, not hugely but still you want to have aerodynamic rockets, and the way it works in KSP, is that the more slopped in the front it is, the better
and you need to have all the width of a rocket (the cross section to the airstream) be in front of a cone, to do that, just make sure that none of the attachement nodes (the green balls in the editor) are empty, make sure that all of them have something attached to them, and make sure that it's something pointy if those nodes are facing towards where you are going
if you have a large fuel tank, put a slanted adapter, then a nose cone, KSP doesn't do proper aerodynamics, but it does read the front face of any part, then gives it drag, linear to how large it is, and squared to how flat it is
if, however, there is a part that is attached to the node, and the same size (important!), then the drag value for that part in the front will be ZERO!!!!
so to recap for KSP aerodynamics, always have stuff as slanted as possible towards the front, even if it looks silly (or just sacrifice efficiency for aesthetics, that's fine too), then make sure that there is no green node that is facing towards the front with nothing attached, if there is, cover it up with a nosecone, or conical fuel tank, and if it's too large for any nose cone, put adapters that make the front narrower and narrower until a nosecone can fit
for your Eve getaway rocket, you actually did a very good job as far as KSP is concerned for aerodynamics, you had every node attached to something, there never was a flat surface towards the front, and it all expanded from smaller nodes
for example, the way you did it, with a 1.25m splitter that creates 2 nodes, then slowly working your way up from those two 1.25m nodes to the big 3.75m nodes is EXACTLY what KSP wants, so your rocket was very aerodynamic, even if it looked silly and had tanks clipping into each other, as far as the aerodynamics of the game you did a good job (which matters a lot on Eve with it's huge atmopshere)
you should try to do a rescue mission to dres
and the strandee would be in the largest canyon in the kerbol system
Yesterday I was rewatching p1 well wondering when p2 would come out
Took a lot longer than I expected + I was a little burnt out after part one but I'm glad I finished it!
Same
I'm going to call you.... Mister Motor-Mouth!!!!! It seems to me you had a way over-engineered solution to a simple problem.
Good vid Reid!
Thank you btw do going to all planets and moons in Kerbal space program
the design is very kerbal
You can press z and x to instantly max out and turn off your engines instead of using the thrust limiter or shift and control.
Hey theres a game thats really fun and complex but you can build basically anything in it. It's called from the depths and it would really fit in well with the games u play since they are sandboxy/building focused
8:53 ART
Maby get to Eve with only nuclear power
How do you take off in Kerbin‘s atmosphere with only nuclear engines?
I'm pretty sure the aerospike engine is pretty good on eve. :)
I have 2 days. I’ve put it off long enough. I must conquer Eve before KSP2 releases.
Wish me luck, friends.
Fineliii! Prt2
I understood absolutely nothing and I loved it
What you need to do is learn the art of interstage fairings.
I have a 1st stage rocket that would have no issues putting this thing in orbit because it has enough Dv to put itself on a kerbin escape and is capable of a max thrust of over 140k kn.
To put in perspective it can place a 500k weight unit object in kerbin orbit without a second stage and has no issues lifting such a load.
This all comes at a pretty hefty cost, so sadly not viable for money careers as it is insanely expensive.
15:57 i think that happened because that RCS thruster got in the way.
Oh yes a “slightly” more advanced engine
oh hey you actually did it
Can't wait for him to figure out separatrons
Shh, we do not need to give him more power
What's good about sepatrons?
Kerbal version of the martian.
The eveian.
Isn‘t that Duna?
I want to see you Dock to a Space ship, thats Flying really fast and is in a Nonsensical Rotation Pattern and in a Northern and southpole Eliptic Orbit above Kerbin, but before you send a Trip over there to catch and recover that space ship, you need to get data from the mun surface and land on kerbin to deliver the sample to a rover and then you can begin to recover the Space ship, then land safely on kerbin with it... You need to have all the fuel to do this in 1 go (Multiple Refuel rockets are fine) you can't use rcs only the worst Reaction wheels because you are in the early state of Spaceflight, You can use all fuel tanks and Engines from before 4 tier of the research tree you'r choice if you wanna make it a bit easier or make it more hellish.
Bruh? I got orbit the moon with in 24 trys and you amazing 👏
He‘s kinda inefficient.
You should make a piston engine in trailmakers
Wait a second is he not using kerbal engineering redux?
You should get scatterer and eve and astronomers visual pack
Amazing video! Can u pls try doing Dres recovery mission? But, 😅first time, crash on the Dres
I need a meme rocket idea to get there, and I think I have just the idea
@@ReidCaptain Nice! So, GOD SPEED to all your projects!
what’s dres?
@@hobartbartholomewpepperidgejr Ur mom
This released dopamine
spirit airlines energy in the start
Welp more videos making him in more pain.
get to the mun with only seperatrons
haven't said it but i love your vids keep it up
Try accidently launching them into deep space and getting them back
Make a jet that goes all the way around kirban please
Kerbin and no that‘s boring
try landing on eve with only solid rocket boosters
Land on every planet and then end it by crashing into jool
Science said it couldn't be done.
11:30 eve looks like the death star
When are u gonna continue the scrap mecanic explosive engine?
I haven't really considered it mainly because I would need an entirely new engine design
WOOOO
FINALLY!
It's just going to kerbin from eve but with more steps
Is it possible to make a tour of the system starship that is capable of visiting every location in the game, colkecting a 100% catalogue of all discoveries across the entire game? Asking for future KSP2 players.
Yes, there is and it was already built.
I love how youre doin all this and im over here feelin like a toddler playin with blocks cuz im unable to figure out what to do to get Jeb back from Low Kerbin Orbit xD I am doin it in the mission syyle tho (i need objectives and goals lol) but im also play on super easy mode cuz i made it easier than the easiest settings
But all that does is mean money is no object for the most part... And i can get science easier to get the parts i need.
Still, i dont think i have a chance to just like dock with the ship i left up there cuz ofc it doesnt have such... So im thinkin im gonna just have to figure out how to get next to it and give it a push i guess
Once you get a close encounter with jeb's ship, just switch over to it and have Jeb EVA to your ship. Make sure to bring two seats!
@@wisdomofnotch (Also, thanks! Gonna try do this later today) Now that ya say it, duh xD Tho... Wait, i mite have to bring him an EVA suit or somethin. I think i sent him up into orbit before i had those cuz i remember bein annoyed i cudnt take him out like i wanted to do xD Tho hopefully the upgrade worked on him too
I am sad i dont get to shove Jeb out of LKO tho :P
When i play KSP, i def feel more like the commander from the Door Monster KSP skits than i do like RC xD
Definitly more complicated, but can't you send a refueling ship up with an engineer? Add on ports and dock so you can transfer fuel and then Deorbit? I may be wrong though so if a ksp expert wants to correct me do so!
@@alexparadise6121 The other persons idea sounds much simpler heh, as is im gonna be havin a hard enuf time figurin out how to get into the same orbit to even bring a ship for Jeb to hop onto; let alone figurin out refuelin xD
Tho that wud be the cooler way to do it ofc, but then i feel id just hop over to Jeb and use the fuel to go further out into orbit just cuz i got more fuel to do it now :P
Hey i really like your vids but i have to give you one little tip ;)
While listening to your explainations its hard to listen to you, cause you talk without any pause... you would to it in real life too right?
So just speak slower and/ or get more breaks in so its way nicer to listen to you
Anyways go on and make those great videos
yes sure.. atmosphere is pulling you down :-)
More like slowing you down.