I have the older generation non-wagon version. I am at 253,000 miles and still on original motor and transmission also. They were built well and last long if maintained. Motor is same series but the 2.0 sohc non-mivec.
I put 278,000 on mine. NEVER changed a single belt. Changed brakes and suspension as they wore out. It survived all my kids learning to drive and was around after they grew up. Traded it in for a Evo X. That Ralliart would bark the tires on the 2-3/3-4 shift right till I got rid of it. Great car.
I remember seeing these years ago more often as a sedan than a wagon. There was a Yellow one I saw alot near my neighborhood. Sharp wagon, good handling.
I believe I saw one of these on the other day! Had to take a double look at it to make sure I was not going crazy! But it’s sad that wagons are not popular, hopefully they make a comeback soon!
My 05 Ralliart Sedan is still hauling along healthy. (Despite Wisconsin rust). The engine is at 162k miles. I’m sure the engine can go another 100k with the maintenance I’ve done to it. The body on the other hand after 20 years………..
I live in an area with over 1,000,000 people and I have never seen one of these wagons. I factory ordered a 2003 Passat GLX wagon in May of 2002. 5 speed manual. Sticker price was $10k more than this Mitsubishi wagon. I drove that VW for 18 years and loved it.
Although this Lancer Wagon is just a Ralliart, there is a small number of people who upgraded these to have the same power as an Evo. It was the only way to get an "Evo Wagon" outside of Japan since the real Evo Wagon was only sold in Japan for about 5 years. But still, interesting and cool looking car nonetheless.
I remember looking at a couple of these when they first came out and never found one with a manual transmission. Today I learned they were never even available with one so I don't feel as bad for not looking harder for one. No way would I have purchased an auto back in those days. These things did not sell well compared to the sedan and I'm guessing the automatic - only powertrain is part of the reason. Very sad considering these were decent cars. I've known a few people with Lancers from this era and they had absolutely nothing negative to say about them. Great cars from a bygone time
@@fernandorocha8459 Not really, Japan, Australia/New Zealand also have lots of wagons around. America used to have them but due to manufacturers action's both in marketting and attempts to exploit loopholes pushed people into SUVs. It's just that there was never aprice hike for these nor is there any loophole for SUVs or pickup trucks that lets manufacturers earn more money on each lazily done suv. Nor there is any chicken tax that would artificially raise the price of wagons which cost the same as sedans here with very minimal increase in some cases(400-800 dollars usually if its a thing at all). Plus almost every single car has a wagon bodystyle for example Corolla which in us only comes as a sedan and a hatch, in europe its also available as a wagon. In US only affordable and well selling wagon left is Subaru Outback, partly because its assembled in USA, and subaru has a very strong cult following in US.
@@joskjj3625 not sure where you are getting that from but Mitsubishi has one of the lowest rates of repair, claims in the industry. I’ve been a extended warranty claims administrator for the past 10 years.
I have the Ralliart trim and love it. I take great pride in owning this rare wagon. Have had it for almost 1 year now. Only 79000 miles. Fun little car.
Not knocking this little wagon but it's interesting that 24mpg on a natually aspirated 4cyl back then was considered good, whereas today you can get 38-40mpg on a much larger Camry 4cyl. I guess a few extra gears and engine tech really has improved.
Yeah, I had a 2007 Scion tC and got ~28mpg mainly highway driving, it had the same 2.4L engine as the Camry back then. Some pretty good improvements in MPG over the years without it even being a hybrid. Apparently the 2023 Camry hybrid gets an even better 50-53mpg.
Fun fact; this video is often given credit in many a term paper surrounding "what went wrong" with Mitsubishi. Seriously, how did a company with deep pockets and a few cool cars F it up? I guess its like when the Fonz was still trying to be cool in like 1983, beer belly and all.
Man, these things are rare but I know somebody that has one and it only has about 20,000 miles and it is mine whenever they decide to sell such a cool little wagon! But like everybody says it was a missed opportunity to Evo it
Mitsubishi seemed to have a lot of good ideas but their timing was often out of sync with the market. The Expo and the Expo LRV were too early to the market, there was no demand for small SUVs when Mitsubishi offered them
There was very popular 1.6 (98hp, 5 speed manual) petrol engine in EU. Extremly reliable, dirt chep for maitenance and perfect for LPG instalation. Even today we can find decent one for 2500-3000 euros.
That's exactly the one I have! Even in the EU I don't see many around, as they were only available in gasoline version, and back then diesel was ruling in the wagon segment.
I had the regular 04 sportback. Loved it. Wish it had a bigger tank. I miss my baby. Reliable. I took a risk as I got mine at 171k and drove it till 250k.
It's always odd to see a model that was only around for 1 year like the Ralliart wagon. It makes me think "why did they even bother?". I test drove one of these way back in 2012 at a dealership and really liked it. Next day I decided to buy it and called them but it was gone. Subsequently forgot about them until recently, and now looking for one.
A neighbor in college drove one of these. Also in silver. Always thought it looked neat. Too bad about the no manual, especially since you could still get one on the normal Lancer sedan.
I had the sedan, and I hated that transmission. It wasn't bad in terms of reliability, but the only way you were getting 28MPG out of it was at 55 MPH. The overdrive had a high ratio and at 75MPH it threatened to roll into the MIVEC lobe because the variable timing kicked in at 3200 RPM. Every day I owned that car I genuinely wished I had bought the manual instead.
bought one of these 1.6 engine. costed me 500 euros. had to get a new front windshield because it had a crack, cost me 500 euros (windshield including the repair guys driving to me and putting it in etc), had to get a rear hatch because the rear had it's window crashed or smashed in by someone, costed me 75 euros. bought a woofer and an amplifier and a radio, costed me 90 euros. had to get 4 new sparkplugs and a sparkplug wire, costed me 60 euros. 1225 euros for this car, and it drives very well. airco works perfectly fine. 148 thousand miles. i'd say i got a bargain sale on it.
Yea... I'm currently 19 years old, and I've never seen one of those before. I think it's because of not offering a manual, but idk. This was probably Mitsubishis biggest flop back then.
Never saw one of these. I owned a 2010 Lancer Sportback GTS and it was a hatchback. That said I in the ten years I owned it I only saw two others. Very rare car. I have to say that 2004 had a much nicer looking interior than my 2010 Lancer. The interior of my car looked pretty cheap.
I absolutely love my 'ugly duckling', boring, but solid USDM '09 Mitsubishi Galant, powered by the same 2.4L 4G69 as this Lancer wagon. My Galant has outlived both my neighbor's 2009 Camry and my friend's 2008 Honda Accord -- both also with 2.4L engines with over 100-120K miles. The Camry died due to its 2AZ-FE I4 having defective piston rings/excessive oil consumption/starvation. The Accord's K24 suffered a similar fate. Who would've thunk the underdog Mitsubishi would outlive both of these popular models?!?!?
This was an underrated and under appreciated compact wagon. I would not want a manual transmission on it, for I prefer a less active style of driving. Manual transmissions are not always fun to drive and they don’t get any better fuel mileage.
WHY DID THEY NOT MAKE A VIDEO OF THE SEDAN WITH THE 5-SPEED I DON'T UNDERSTAND........ I'm a Honda guy been building them for over 20 years But I have to say I picked up a 2004 Mitsubishi lancer Ralliart 5-speed manual sedan and the 5 speeds what makes this car!!!!!!!!! THE AUTOMATIC IS NOT THE SAME.... This thing is fun I've done full bolt ons on it a true cold air intake 4-1 header full 2.5 inch cat back exhaust ported and polished intake manifold and bigger V6 eclipse throttle body Plan to do a upgraded camshaft next and then go get it Dyno tuned but as of right now this thing is fun and just like my Hondas it's the prices a lot of people at red lights that think it's just your average slow lancer It gets the looks and the power to back it up unlike the OZ rally that's just a looks package you get the front lip rear lip side skirts spoiler lowered suspension bigger wider Wheels bigger brake package strut bar sway bars The evil shifter the Evo gauges and Evo 7 GTA seats!!! I wish I would have had one of these back when they were new
I wonder if anyone has ever done an Evo drivetrain swap on one of these? With steelies and hubcaps, it would be an absolute sleeper. Also, what is a "bace" price?
I think 2004 was truly peak selection for wagons in the U.S. market, you could choose from models by: BMW Audi Mercedes Saab Volvo Subaru Mitsubishi Lexus Volkswagen Mazda Ford Chevrolet Saturn probably more, just off the top of my head..
It was ahead of it's time... Technically this is what's in style now. I.e crossovers... take a station wagon or van , Slap AWD on it, give it a small lift, Independent rear axle suspension... = Crossover But Mitsubishi is in love with the eclipse cross. Aka baby aztek
@@DS_IndustrieZ The reason why I like this car so much is that it's NOT a crossover. "The Crossover" is the dumbest, most contrived product the auto industry has ever foisted on the buying public. History won't be kind. Someday, probably soon, people will look back and recognize them for what they truly are: an embarrassment. Wagons, on the other hand, are the way.
A proper boxy wagon. Today they take the same car, chop the cargo roofline so severely that it kills cargo room making the back useless in carrying cargo. But hey, it’s to save the insecure feeling of the driver who wants to think he’s driving a sports car when deep inside it’s still a station wagon masquerading as a “hatchback”. 😂😂😂😂
@@RomanM803 it’s a station wagon, meant to haul stuff. You want something sporty, buy a sports car. A sloped rear hatch doesn’t magically turn a family car into a hyper exotic 🤣
This should have been a euro only model and replaced in the US by a Lancer hatch. SUVs have been destroying cars/wagons/minivan segments since the 90’s. Mitsu got too prideful on the popularity of the lancer. Great review though!
@@CherrySquishee Basically the alliance is getting an overhaul to make it more equal. Since Renault owned a high percentage of Nissan, it was not fair for Nissan (and Mitsubishi to an extent since Nissan owns a majority of them). Therefore, Renault is going to cut their stake in Nissan, which will make Nissan more independent.
@@this_dude5307 appreciate the information. I know Renault is not present here in America , but mainly Europe. We need another large sedan, and no I wont mention the G4! lol
New European Mitsubishi ASX is a 100% Renault Captur with 10% higher price. Badge engineering, they needed only the rights to the logo. There is not a single Mitsubishi made part in it.
Boy have times changed. 8 sec 0-60 was considered sporty... Today I'm honestly not sure if you can buy an entry level car that isn't faster than 8 sec lol
3:08 "Active ride quality" John Davis Translator: "This thing rides stiffer than an oxcart. Over bumps this thing bounces around more than Baywatch boobies. If Pfizer made a little blue pill to firm up saggy springs then this thing downed the whole bottle. It's as unyielding as a drill sergeant, as punishing as twenty years in prison, and I really would rather have a Buick."
I kind of wish Mitsubishi still handling answered cuz it would just be such a welcome relief from the sea of these horrible Toyota toasters i see Everywhere I Go
Still driving this, 245,000 miles original engine and transmission! The interior held up too, good plastics.
I have an 05 kia Spectra 5 wagon. Race ya? Just kidding enjoy your ride
@@Devogor well at least it was a good value ;)
I have the older generation non-wagon version. I am at 253,000 miles and still on original motor and transmission also. They were built well and last long if maintained. Motor is same series but the 2.0 sohc non-mivec.
I put 278,000 on mine. NEVER changed a single belt. Changed brakes and suspension as they wore out. It survived all my kids learning to drive and was around after they grew up. Traded it in for a Evo X. That Ralliart would bark the tires on the 2-3/3-4 shift right till I got rid of it. Great car.
Not offering the Lancer Wagon with a manual and in EVO VII/VIII/IX guises truly was a missed opportunity.
They did make Evo wagons in other countries
@@Swag_K1RBY They certainly didn't bring'em here in Europe, cause I never saw them.
There were Evo Wagons from 2005-07, but only in Japan.
It’s really like companies don’t understand or listen to their buyers
100% agree!
The Honda Fit limousine
These older Motorweek reviews are miles better than today's.
Its the same concept today. its just the cars of today that are shit, so of course its not as interesting..
I remember seeing these years ago more often as a sedan than a wagon. There was a Yellow one I saw alot near my neighborhood. Sharp wagon, good handling.
Never knew there was a Lancer station wagon that came out in the USA.
In the Netherlands it was ONLY sold as a wagon
It was offered only one model year. Rare vehicle.
I believe I saw one of these on the other day! Had to take a double look at it to make sure I was not going crazy! But it’s sad that wagons are not popular, hopefully they make a comeback soon!
They were in the 90s, Cool wagon!
America's being backed into it by rebranding them as "CUV"s lol. I'm here for it though. Wagons make so much sense.
One of the last good things to come out of Mitsu. Boy I miss this Mitsu too.
This car sucks lol
@@MeowMochi3 how so?
My 05 Ralliart Sedan is still hauling along healthy. (Despite Wisconsin rust). The engine is at 162k miles. I’m sure the engine can go another 100k with the maintenance I’ve done to it. The body on the other hand after 20 years………..
I had a 2004 Lancer Sportback, although not the Ralliart. Still, it was my favorite of the 5 cars I've owned/driven in my life.
A rare gem to see in the Dallas TX area. Most of the ones I've seen came from Cali.
I had the sedan! Loved that car!
Mitsubishi Lancer wagons and sedan is beautifuls and solid cars.
I live in an area with over 1,000,000 people and I have never seen one of these wagons. I factory ordered a 2003 Passat GLX wagon in May of 2002. 5 speed manual. Sticker price was $10k more than this Mitsubishi wagon. I drove that VW for 18 years and loved it.
Did you get a new one nowadays?
I now drive a 2018 Buick Regal TourX (Opel/Vauxhall Insignia) wagon.
That’s because these are incredibly rare - I’ve read that only a couple hundred were sold (some say as low as 200)
Man new cars were so much more affordable back then. 😢
Those Passats were nice, I had an 03 myself.
Although this Lancer Wagon is just a Ralliart, there is a small number of people who upgraded these to have the same power as an Evo. It was the only way to get an "Evo Wagon" outside of Japan since the real Evo Wagon was only sold in Japan for about 5 years.
But still, interesting and cool looking car nonetheless.
super clean cluster and audio system.
I've always been fond of this and the later 9th generation Lancer wagon. Shame they were both so short lived here in the US.
I remember looking at a couple of these when they first came out and never found one with a manual transmission. Today I learned they were never even available with one so I don't feel as bad for not looking harder for one. No way would I have purchased an auto back in those days. These things did not sell well compared to the sedan and I'm guessing the automatic - only powertrain is part of the reason. Very sad considering these were decent cars. I've known a few people with Lancers from this era and they had absolutely nothing negative to say about them. Great cars from a bygone time
These were relatively common in Europe in it's day, and if I remember correctly, they were mainly manuals back then. Interesting vehicles!
Europe is unique continent is commom wagons
@@fernandorocha8459 Not really, Japan, Australia/New Zealand also have lots of wagons around. America used to have them but due to manufacturers action's both in marketting and attempts to exploit loopholes pushed people into SUVs. It's just that there was never aprice hike for these nor is there any loophole for SUVs or pickup trucks that lets manufacturers earn more money on each lazily done suv. Nor there is any chicken tax that would artificially raise the price of wagons which cost the same as sedans here with very minimal increase in some cases(400-800 dollars usually if its a thing at all). Plus almost every single car has a wagon bodystyle for example Corolla which in us only comes as a sedan and a hatch, in europe its also available as a wagon.
In US only affordable and well selling wagon left is Subaru Outback, partly because its assembled in USA, and subaru has a very strong cult following in US.
I hate having Asian cars in Europe.
Side and rear is Volvoesque good. Rare then, unicorn status in 2023.
I've seen one of these done up with all EVO parts and CTS-V Brembos... great looking little wagon.
Mitsubishi sold Evolution version of wagon aswell.
@@jareknowak8712 in the U.S.?!
@@AdditionSupplyDepotsRequired Nope Japan only.
Back when Mitsubishi made good cars
They still make good ca…I mean crossovers 😂
yeah they still make good suvs but not sports cars :(
@@jczerozerotwo3071 crossovers aren’t “suvs” and Mitsubishi crossovers are junk
@@joskjj3625 the new outlander is a good vehicle, and has sales to back it up
@@joskjj3625 not sure where you are getting that from but Mitsubishi has one of the lowest rates of repair, claims in the industry. I’ve been a extended warranty claims administrator for the past 10 years.
I've never seen or heard of the regular Lancer wagon let alone this.
I have the Ralliart trim and love it. I take great pride in owning this rare wagon. Have had it for almost 1 year now. Only 79000 miles. Fun little car.
Not knocking this little wagon but it's interesting that 24mpg on a natually aspirated 4cyl back then was considered good, whereas today you can get 38-40mpg on a much larger Camry 4cyl. I guess a few extra gears and engine tech really has improved.
I think it's mostly the transmission that does it.
One item I’ve learned is that the higher mpg also requires a much lighter weight motor oil. Learned that with my first Prius.
Yeah, I had a 2007 Scion tC and got ~28mpg mainly highway driving, it had the same 2.4L engine as the Camry back then. Some pretty good improvements in MPG over the years without it even being a hybrid. Apparently the 2023 Camry hybrid gets an even better 50-53mpg.
Hey look, it's something you don't see everyday: a really cool and fun Mitsubishi! It's a shame these all rotted to pieces.
Mitsubishi needs to bring some kind of Lancer back (as long as it's not an SUV that they name the "Lancer Cross")
Bought one new in 04 and still have it. Great car.
Fun fact; this video is often given credit in many a term paper surrounding "what went wrong" with Mitsubishi. Seriously, how did a company with deep pockets and a few cool cars F it up?
I guess its like when the Fonz was still trying to be cool in like 1983, beer belly and all.
I miss the 2000's
I can't believe I don't see this '04 car on the road anymore....
Man, these things are rare but I know somebody that has one and it only has about 20,000 miles and it is mine whenever they decide to sell such a cool little wagon! But like everybody says it was a missed opportunity to Evo it
This was sold as Evo in Japan aswell.
Mitsubishi seemed to have a lot of good ideas but their timing was often out of sync with the market. The Expo and the Expo LRV were too early to the market, there was no demand for small SUVs when Mitsubishi offered them
There was very popular 1.6 (98hp, 5 speed manual) petrol engine in EU. Extremly reliable, dirt chep for maitenance and perfect for LPG instalation. Even today we can find decent one for 2500-3000 euros.
That's exactly the one I have!
Even in the EU I don't see many around, as they were only available in gasoline version, and back then diesel was ruling in the wagon segment.
I had the regular 04 sportback. Loved it. Wish it had a bigger tank. I miss my baby. Reliable. I took a risk as I got mine at 171k and drove it till 250k.
It's always odd to see a model that was only around for 1 year like the Ralliart wagon. It makes me think "why did they even bother?". I test drove one of these way back in 2012 at a dealership and really liked it. Next day I decided to buy it and called them but it was gone. Subsequently forgot about them until recently, and now looking for one.
A neighbor in college drove one of these. Also in silver. Always thought it looked neat. Too bad about the no manual, especially since you could still get one on the normal Lancer sedan.
I had the sedan, and I hated that transmission. It wasn't bad in terms of reliability, but the only way you were getting 28MPG out of it was at 55 MPH. The overdrive had a high ratio and at 75MPH it threatened to roll into the MIVEC lobe because the variable timing kicked in at 3200 RPM. Every day I owned that car I genuinely wished I had bought the manual instead.
Personally, I'd rather have this car's transmission (let alone, learning to drive a manual) than the later Lancer's CVT.
What a truly hideous looking car.
I want one.
I've only ever seen one of these around where I used to live a couple months ago.
Two HP more than the LS! 😆
😂
The sedan LS didn't even have that engine, only a 2.0L I4 with 120 hp. The wagon got a bigger engine standard.
@@nfscamilo4 you are correct!
bought one of these 1.6 engine. costed me 500 euros. had to get a new front windshield because it had a crack, cost me 500 euros (windshield including the repair guys driving to me and putting it in etc), had to get a rear hatch because the rear had it's window crashed or smashed in by someone, costed me 75 euros. bought a woofer and an amplifier and a radio, costed me 90 euros. had to get 4 new sparkplugs and a sparkplug wire, costed me 60 euros. 1225 euros for this car, and it drives very well. airco works perfectly fine. 148 thousand miles. i'd say i got a bargain sale on it.
I got a Motorweek review car. Peugeot 1989. Still works. Not one hundred per cent sure but all the references concord.
Mitsubishi is a pretty good car...
*was
@@jareknowak8712........ 🤫
I love and even adore station wagons version of sedans whatever it was.
No manual was a mistake on these! I've seen guys attempt to turn regular lancers to Evos. Not a pretty sight lol.
I don't recall seeing any of these Lancer wagons on the road back then. Rare car in the US?
Very rare I think they made for 2 model years
Yea... I'm currently 19 years old, and I've never seen one of those before. I think it's because of not offering a manual, but idk. This was probably Mitsubishis biggest flop back then.
Rare vehicle. Made only for the 2004 Model Year. Guess the value of the larger 2.4 standard on the wagon didn't help to sell these wagons.
I see a few around my local area. Never saw a wagon in the junkyard though.
2500 imported, 2000 sold, don't know what happened to the other 500.
Never saw one of these. I owned a 2010 Lancer Sportback GTS and it was a hatchback. That said I in the ten years I owned it I only saw two others. Very rare car. I have to say that 2004 had a much nicer looking interior than my 2010 Lancer. The interior of my car looked pretty cheap.
I absolutely love my 'ugly duckling', boring, but solid USDM '09 Mitsubishi Galant, powered by the same 2.4L 4G69 as this Lancer wagon. My Galant has outlived both my neighbor's 2009 Camry and my friend's 2008 Honda Accord -- both also with 2.4L engines with over 100-120K miles. The Camry died due to its 2AZ-FE I4 having defective piston rings/excessive oil consumption/starvation. The Accord's K24 suffered a similar fate. Who would've thunk the underdog Mitsubishi would outlive both of these popular models?!?!?
The engine seen here would later be used in the 4G Eclipse.
I love my ralliart wagon, never going to sell it for anything best daily wagon ever
This was an underrated and under appreciated compact wagon. I would not want a manual transmission on it, for I prefer a less active style of driving. Manual transmissions are not always fun to drive and they don’t get any better fuel mileage.
Great. Now I want one.
...I've never seen one, though
Come to think of it, there were a number of small wagons in the mid-2000s. 🤔
Better horsepower than the Protege5, though I still think I would have preferred the Mazda
WHY DID THEY NOT MAKE A VIDEO OF THE SEDAN WITH THE 5-SPEED I DON'T UNDERSTAND........
I'm a Honda guy been building them for over 20 years
But I have to say I picked up a 2004 Mitsubishi lancer Ralliart 5-speed manual sedan and the 5 speeds what makes this car!!!!!!!!! THE AUTOMATIC IS NOT THE SAME....
This thing is fun I've done full bolt ons on it a true cold air intake 4-1 header full 2.5 inch cat back exhaust ported and polished intake manifold and bigger V6 eclipse throttle body
Plan to do a upgraded camshaft next and then go get it Dyno tuned but as of right now this thing is fun and just like my Hondas it's the prices a lot of people at red lights that think it's just your average slow lancer
It gets the looks and the power to back it up unlike the OZ rally that's just a looks package you get the front lip rear lip side skirts spoiler lowered suspension bigger wider Wheels bigger brake package strut bar sway bars
The evil shifter the Evo gauges and Evo 7 GTA seats!!!
I wish I would have had one of these back when they were new
I wonder if anyone has ever done an Evo drivetrain swap on one of these? With steelies and hubcaps, it would be an absolute sleeper.
Also, what is a "bace" price?
There were Evo Wagons sold by Mitsubishi.
Over 11 sold!
I think 2004 was truly peak selection for wagons in the U.S. market, you could choose from models by:
BMW
Audi
Mercedes
Saab
Volvo
Subaru
Mitsubishi
Lexus
Volkswagen
Mazda
Ford
Chevrolet
Saturn
probably more, just off the top of my head..
we gotta bring this back. Crossovers and SUVs need to go.
Mercury Sable wagon was still around, too.
I know my cars but I never knew this was released.
This car looked old even when it came out😂
I've never seen one of these in my life. I've only ever seen the Lancer sedan.
Looks really cool. Still
"Bace" price - they shoulda asked one more question during the interview process when hiring whoever did the opticals.
1997 MITSUBISHI LANCER
These were sold in the US? I've literally never seen one.
The first time I saw one of these I wanted one to swap an Evo drive train into. Maybe one day...
You can buy JDM Evo wagon.
Epic in any color other than white 😅
What a great looking car. Why can't they make sensible stuff like this today?
It was ahead of it's time... Technically this is what's in style now. I.e crossovers... take a station wagon or van , Slap AWD on it, give it a small lift, Independent rear axle suspension... = Crossover
But Mitsubishi is in love with the eclipse cross. Aka baby aztek
@@DS_IndustrieZ The reason why I like this car so much is that it's NOT a crossover. "The Crossover" is the dumbest, most contrived product the auto industry has ever foisted on the buying public. History won't be kind. Someday, probably soon, people will look back and recognize them for what they truly are: an embarrassment. Wagons, on the other hand, are the way.
Is this for sale? I can’t find one of these at all I found a base model but can’t find a Ralliart
Throw a 5 speed in it and I would actively look for one to buy
1:41 - I dunno, OF begs to differ LOL!
The good ol days when one had many wagon choices. Today we are down to two or three. The front end on this is not particularly 'good looking'.
I've never saw one of these in my life
Looks like the front and rear were designed by different people.
Theres a couple of these on Oahu
Cute car
A proper boxy wagon.
Today they take the same car, chop the cargo roofline so severely that it kills cargo room making the back useless in carrying cargo.
But hey, it’s to save the insecure feeling of the driver who wants to think he’s driving a sports car when deep inside it’s still a station wagon masquerading as a “hatchback”. 😂😂😂😂
It’s ugly, rent a truck if you need space
@@RomanM803 it’s a station wagon, meant to haul stuff. You want something sporty, buy a sports car. A sloped rear hatch doesn’t magically turn a family car into a hyper exotic 🤣
Boxy wagon appreciators stand up!
This should have been a euro only model and replaced in the US by a Lancer hatch. SUVs have been destroying cars/wagons/minivan segments since the 90’s. Mitsu got too prideful on the popularity of the lancer. Great review though!
I’ve only seen one of these
F's in the chat for Mitsubishi's golden years
Don't think I've ever seen one on the road 🤔
4:23 Bace Price? Anyone notice that?
Huh, Mitsubishi did the tail lights before Cadillac
Now with Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi this brand is truly dead.
I've been hearing Renault is being pushed out.. Im a lil behind in the news tho.
Absolutely not the case, the alliance is actually going to help the brand, according to Automotive News.
@@CherrySquishee Basically the alliance is getting an overhaul to make it more equal. Since Renault owned a high percentage of Nissan, it was not fair for Nissan (and Mitsubishi to an extent since Nissan owns a majority of them). Therefore, Renault is going to cut their stake in Nissan, which will make Nissan more independent.
@@this_dude5307 appreciate the information. I know Renault is not present here in America , but mainly Europe. We need another large sedan, and no I wont mention the G4! lol
New European Mitsubishi ASX is a 100% Renault Captur with 10% higher price.
Badge engineering, they needed only the rights to the logo.
There is not a single Mitsubishi made part in it.
I want one, too bad they're rare.
Should have came in EVO and stick.
A 6 speed auto would've been a great option instead of the 4 speed.
1997 Ford Aerostar Cargo Van
I wonder why they only sold this for a single year
Boy have times changed. 8 sec 0-60 was considered sporty... Today I'm honestly not sure if you can buy an entry level car that isn't faster than 8 sec lol
I’ve seen more Bugattis in Cleveland Ohio than I have lancer sportbacks lmao
"Bace" price !???😢😢
Looks like a volvo v70 modeled and rendered on a ps1
❤Mitsubishi
Was John wearing black face?
it looks like a mix of civic si hatch and ford focus wagon lol
Agreed, the front really looks like the 2001 Focus I had. I like it though
it's so werid seeing the exact same car as my moms....I can only think she has the only one but I know its not true 😂
3:08 "Active ride quality"
John Davis Translator: "This thing rides stiffer than an oxcart. Over bumps this thing bounces around more than Baywatch boobies. If Pfizer made a little blue pill to firm up saggy springs then this thing downed the whole bottle. It's as unyielding as a drill sergeant, as punishing as twenty years in prison, and I really would rather have a Buick."
I kind of wish Mitsubishi still handling answered cuz it would just be such a welcome relief from the sea of these horrible Toyota toasters i see Everywhere I Go
I missed the days when we could say tranny for transmission and nobody got offended.
Tanning is racist...
Family!
That rear end design is extremely plain
Not keep the repo man at bay😂