The best part is he has done more to help professional women in the high end workforce than any government. Ask him about it he'll tell you all about it.
The world is much like it always was: people are running away from responsibility and moral behavior. I think we are just much more aware of it because of the internet and social media. Because people can hide behind anonymity, they express what they really believe more frequently and as such we can see how immoral people really are. I really appreciate that there is at least on person out there campaigning for moral responsibility. I like that Jordan Peterson explains very clearly his REASONS why people should seek to be moral and even "noble" as he puts it, because too much of the dialogue I see online revolves around money, sex, and immediate gratification. He doesn't sound like he's sermonizing, but rather he's arguing for good, common sense so people are armed against life's calamities.
I second that. He sat through that ridiculous attempt at intellectualism and it ended up as a hens talk with Peterson just rubbernecking back and forth...
He is amazing at allowing people to speak and allowing people to speak over him and try and put words in his mouth....then shuts them down in one sentence! Very smart man.
You are so right. I admire him for many reasons, but I think you nailed the number one. Listening to feminist drivel for over 50 years, I could never sit there and listen to those insufferable idiots pontificate while Peterson sat there. Does anyone actually interview anymore?
There was a roman emperor. He had a brilliant idea of universal clothes for all of the slaves. His advisors told him:" Bad idea. They will understand they are majority".
@@tuzziosamson3601 that's why a lot of people do not take feminism serious. Because it is not serious. You have just proven my point. No chance at argument now.
@tomperkins4620 He attempted it. And I doubt he was successful, considering that he was essentially speaking to a brick wall with social justice slogans spray-painted on them. Euphemistically speaking.
That's the biggest problem with most of the people that try to push these agendas. They're incapable of having an actual intelligent debate. Instead, they just memorize phrases that they don't completely understand and try to shoe-horn them into discussions.
Never forget these fools see this as a power struggle, a war on "oppression", and as the saying goes "all is fair in love and war" they seem to live by this with zero sense of honour or integrity. A pretty good way to see how the interviewer/show will be is how they refer to Dr Peterson, if they simply call him an academic or his name they are usually against him, If they refer to him as Doctor or professor they are either relatively neutral or in favour of him.
Because they see only what they want to see. They protest, shout and scream about everything in the west but then turn a blind eye and don't utter a word when it comes to how eastern countries treat women. This woke, left wing, PC culture is killing the west. The people of western countries are increasingly losing the right to see and think as they see fit and it's terrifying that it's happening
@@grandadmiralthrawn9231 Actually, most intersectional feminists will tell you that women being abused in Eastern countries does not in any way negate or "cancel out" women being abused differently in western countries. It's not an either/or. Women are abused quite differently depending on the culture, that should be obvious- but you are all missing it, as usual. Ms. Jordan-a Peterson is saying "since lung cancer is more deadly than breast cancer, breast cancer is not bad at all and people with breast cancer shouldn't whine and bother doctors about it- it's not like they have lung cancer". Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together can see that this is a strawman's fallacy. Unfortunately very few of Ms. Jordan-a Petersons's followers HAVE 2 brain cells and so they miss that entirely. Just because somebody is abused in a different way elsewhere, does not make abuse here okay. duh.
Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion almost immediately, kinda ironic. Hate this superficial “gotcha” style of questioning that seems to pervade modern interviews.
They sound like impatient confident children & he’s the only adult in the room. Many grown & young people I see all around sound like impatient children. We need more of this dude.
Its sad when you only focus on what you are saying, and trying to only get your point across. Rather than trying to understand any counter or reasoning in opposition to your own opinion.
Isn't this straw-manning his opposition? The same thing that others wrongly do to him at times? I'm a fan of Peterson (and also a progressive), but it's important to realize when any side of a debate is illogical, not just the side you agree with.
@@LittleMissHoop Most of them do, yes. And no surprise, because the average person just buys whatever is being sold by the mainstream media. High quality individuals, who think for themselves instead are not many.
@@stardewdaisy4577 That's just him being himself, you're misunderstanding. Also if you can't decipher what I'm getting at then it's not worth my time to argue.
It isn’t ‘men’ that I’m speaking to. It’s people. I am a clinical psychologist. I am ACTUALLY interested in INDIVIDUALS. I’m interested in their fortification against tragedy. You can hear his sincerity as he’s saying these lines.
It's like watching an adult try to explain astronomy to a couple of 3 year old children, who think they are older than you because they were born in January, and you were born in August.
@@emberdragon4248 so hypothetically speaking if she is a bit tired and grumpy taht day and standing on a bus/train she wont expect a man letting her take his seat right?
That’s a very good point, but calling it a weapon is far too much of a compliment. The thing is it’s not even a weapon nor a defense tactic. This feminist constantly interrupting him is the equivalent of a child covering their ears and screaming because they didn’t get their way. She just knows her bullshit argument is not valid or feasible, and that’s very applicable to many of these situations.
They're using all the female manipulative tactics in the book. Interrupting, potshotting, teaming up, twisting narratives, and repeat over and over, and got the nerve to act like they're educated.
Simple truth is I think logic has been curtailed and in its place is this emotionally charged out of control hysteria, I have just finished watching several of his videos so if I am sounding like Jordan I didn't intend to, where logic is more or less a luxury that gets thrown aside whenever the logic isn't working for you but against you. Militant atheism is a classic example of this. If the atheist isn't winning the argument logically then he resorts to troll tactics. I see anti- Christian groups doing the exact same thing in the exact same way. Look at how keyboard jihadis are going after guys like David Wood. It's sad because the whole purpose of logic is to create a method to get at the truth in many ways debaters should be looking forward to being wrong because yeah you had a set back in your conclusions but you got one step closer to the truth even if it's not a truth you would prefer it is still a truth.
@@asgaiyawaya3973 Agree. I call them the emotional mob. They are so emotionally invested in their beliefs, facts and logic are unnecessary. People are guilty until proven guilty, if they do not conform to the neo-marxist views.
Conservative women tend to be more logical. Liberal women , not so much. Having said that , Women will always go the emotional hook if they cannot get their way using common sense. Time for you men to use their emotion against them. .@@asgaiyawaya3973
I’m not a feminist but I think that the world does associate blue with boys and pink with girls, of course girls wear blue and guys wear pink but it’s just a concept that dates back in history.
In her defence. That’s actually a specific reference to her former boss Harriet Harman who got flack from feminists for being patronising when she used pink busses and billboards to promote equality for women.
@@Dilkingt0nne And yet that identifies another hypocrisy of the new feminist movement. They speak as though all of them are strongly united, yet are willing to outcast any person who go against the radical left's rhetoric.
He's such a sweet man. Look how much of a gentleman he is , he stops talking when they interrupt him. Yet they don't share him the same respect allowing him to finish
Hahaha he must have like a 50/50 outlook on these I interviews. Did you see him smile and laugh a bit when she asked her first question like he was thinking oh ffs
Of course that's a problem too. I SAW A video where woman was saying they are changing words Like why HUMAN has man in it. WHY woman has man in it. Female etccc. WAS SO stupid
@@cambelasben Jesus f*cking Christ 🤦♀️ They're really going out of their way to find a problem. They always say "making progress" and yet they will NEVER be satisfied, its like they're skating up a hill.
When Jordan Peterson was asked by the bully in high school "Do your parents know you're gay?" his response was "What do you mean by parents, and what do you mean by gay." This man is a master at avoiding manipulative questions and showing them for what they are.
There is no point in showing people what they are when they have no self-awareness to recognize themselves in anything including the cleanest and clearest mirror. People don't know they are being manipulative and asking loaded questions. Most people just are not that intelligent. It takes a degree of craftiness to manipulate. They are really more interested in arguing their point of view. While force is manipulation, force is really manipulation with the option of doing anything different severely reduced if not eliminated, meaning they are not manipulating, they are forcing their point of view on others.
You know what’s hilarious? If roles reversed, a lone feminist with two male hosts talking over her argument, it’d be called mansplaining. But because it’s two feminists talking over a male guests argument, it’s something else.
Its a trigger for me when u are trying to articulate ur point and get hit with another idiotic ideology from these feminist. They don't listen they just yell their points
@@TheWaross He sounds like a perfectly normal person to me. You however come painfully across as a standard issue liberal eccentric with the usual pseudo-moralistic hyperbole. Hope things get better for you, friend.
For real, imagine being a guest in a TV show, then you always become interrupted by the interviewers. Its okay to interrupt someone as long as you know your place and when you should interrupt. The way I see this is the interviewers being so fckn rude most of the time (not always)
uhh women just talk, they don't listen, even if they let you talk they don't listen to you, they actually only think about what they will say after the man finishes and they can't wait until he finishes.. bruh.
@@JA-ou7nt Aaah! But by simply criticising her, as an individual, you have shown you are a misogynistic, sexist, bigoted pig. You will be dragged before the Ministry of Truth and re-programmed so you will think exactly as you are told!
On his official RUclips channel, his daughter posted an update on his condition. He has been depressed and suicidal lately and he even checked into rehab, if I recall right.
Thats because its such a moronic 'debate', especially for an academic to be involved in. Remember this was not his life's mission, it sort of became because he has to constantly defend himself from this insanity.
@@vinayvardhanyt2415 we'll have to see what Prof. Peterson has to say. The next update on his channel will be from he himself, according to his daughter.
The most interesting thing here, Tyrone McDonald, is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and Tyrone McDonald. Labeling anyone who disagrees with dr. Peterson as a troll clearly identifies you as an unthinking individual and therefore you have nothing of value to share.
Lorraine Connor that’s so sweet Lorraine I’m Guessing you disagree with Jordan who presents a common logic standpoint and anyone who shares common logic is somehow dumb to you ! Must be why I have over 500 likes on this thread and you are alone.
Im so thankful for men like Dr Peterson and modern stoics like Ryan Holiday for giving young men a solid foundation to grow from. I pray for the next generation coming up behind me and i hope they dont fall in the same traps our generation did
the woman on the left is a supporter of him. She is listening and liking what he says. When it preaches each others arguments they over ride the others statement to make it facts. The woman on the right ended up shutting down the woman on the left and Jordan because she had no control in the debate and the other 2 saw eye to eye on how society sits
@@jackknopf5974 i can PARTIALLY agree. I believe women deserve freedom of opportunity and speech. So does that woman on the left, so does Jordan. There are intelligent women who deserve a lot, not many unfortunately but when u see them you shouldn't generalize them
@@CRAZYN1NJA the problem with that statement is that if your siding with those women who claim to be feminists, they are far too ignorant to see that what they are trying to get rid of is that they are just passing it onto men hence them constantly ignoring Jordan. They are an example why feminists are treated the way they are nowadays however there are a small collective of feminists who aren't hypocritical of what they try to debate for
I've always thought that to be the most common feminist attitude... Male or female, shouting and shutting down conversations they don't like is their thing.
It's sad that this IS feminism now. These people are ruining what feminism is meant to be. It's all about equality but these morons only want to put men down and make the world soft.
I think they are very much aware of what they are doing and are trying to dumb the conversation down to paint him in a negative light. I think he's significantly more intelligent than they are, but I don't think they are oblivious to it. I do find them to be idiots, but they are doing it on purpose for "hot sound bites".
My thoughts precisely. However I doubt that he often does TV interviews with people who approach his level of intelligence or eloquence. The demographic in TV personalities seems slightly narrow and cuts off around 20-30 IQ points short of his territory.
@@nowaskmehow When Diane (middle name integrity) Abacus was on the show on the forty oneth of Julember, she was shit hot at the old maths stuff. She used a pocket calculator... she had one on each hand!
@Erick Dias why do you feel it is her job to be disagreeable? If she has the result already loaded, it is not helpful in any way, both sides should be open minded to explore new ways of thinking. This is the biggest problem with left leaning politics these days, no critical thinking. Watch the talks he has with other guests on the Rubin Report and you will see how ideas can develop without pointless drama.
Needed to continue the interview. Please, is there a a second interview? He will hear one of their comments/arguments, understand their words and multiple possibilities of what they may have meant, unpacks them with "if's" to clarify and although his may or may not be a rebuttal he also explains what is important.
Bravo Mr. Peterson , THANK YOU for your common sense approach to this issues, its very reassuring we have a honest and brave man like yourself speaking out for us , MUCH APPREICATED!
They act as if their own gender gave them the right to interrupt the speech of the other gender. As if their own gender gave them some kind of moral superiority.
@@logicalbigbrain426 they can fuck off, we live in a country were we cant express ourselves (logically) because we get shutdown! They say man owns the world but that is rapidly Changing, we have lost our voices. They will laugh at the end if we don't stand up for each other. They don't want equality, they want full control.
My faith in humanity is restored knowing that 95% of these comments are on Peterson’s side. Bravo mankind! Bravo! I actually hadn’t come across a negative comment
But the problem is 80% of the comments are probably identified as men. It's either women don't want to participate or are not interested the topic itself
It's questions like that, that make identity politics such a nightmare because everyone immediately assumes that they have the same beliefs on what a "Real" this, that or the other is.
The problem is they don’t listen to him to actually respond. They have everything they want to say in their head already and just interrupt him with it when most the time it’s irrelevant and makes no sense.
I think this is precisely one of the things feminists are asking ni terms of mentality changes. To stop rationalise everything by facts and numbers all the time and start to accept that feelings intuition and sensibility are things that matter and take a big place in our society and must be taken in consideration on the public and private sphere. Sorry for my english :)
Especially in the face of emotionally charged females; of both sexes. Men like JP are better, I think than those of us who would have the overwhelming urge to slap a b|+€H.
This woman speaks as if Hillary has never done anything wrong, compaired to Trump's affair. Hillary says things just as rude as he does but these women give her a pass just because she is a woman. Both male and female do things wrong but feminist only see the males wrong but women get a pass just because they are NOT male. Feminist have become the things they started out blaming males for and they are just as wrong as the males were.
She herself says it without realizing, “do you think a trans woman is a *_real_* woman?” She knows the difference between trans woman and *_real_* woman. 🤷🏻♂️
Yeah that was the absolute dumbest baited response I've ever seen. Even before he said it I knew he'd disagree with the term "real," and I knew she'd put words in his mouth. Most conservatives actually care MORE about transexuals than most liberals, because they care more about ALL people than such liberals. Liberals just use these people for their collectivized political power it comes to identity politics
This man has become such a historical figure. He is a legend. Someone we absolutely need right now on today’s society. And thank God. The beginning of change in the right direction. Although we have such a long way to go.
@@sohamdas8469 they should have that role, yes. But who listens to them? I can bet you $500 that if Bill Burr has a performance with $50 ticket, and next door are the best scientists talking about how to avert global warning for free, Bill would have packed full room, while scientists would be talking to each other.
Ironically, that just makes it worse. That just translates to "I know your argument, but I'm going to misrepresent it anyway." Can't even claim ignorance.
Xtrendence they also imply that he’s lying. They claim to know his “true” intentions he’s not sharing. They’re just trying in any way they can to discredit him
You totally reminded me of a regular conversation my ex-wife and I would have: Her: This is what you are thinking. Me: No, I am actually thinking something else. Her: You are wrong. I know what you are really thinking. Me: I am pretty sure I know what I am thinking in my own mind. Her: No, you don't. I know better what you are thinking than you do.
I can't help but admire how he manages to stay calm and seated when confronted with that highly toxic cocktail of ideology, stupidity and entitlement every single time. (I also can't help but wonder how that host managed to get and keep a show...)
It has to be frustrating. Seemingly every media person invites him on a platform to accuse him of being transphobic or having some hidden agenda. And he keeps repeating to them that his problem was when the Canadian government violated free speech. It sounds so simple, does it not? Being forced to speak a certain way is a violation of free speech. That would be like a law requiring us in the States to address Mexicans in Spanish. The media would play the race card, and make it about racism when it is not."Oh, you won't address the Mexicans in Spanish, and so you must be racist!"
Tactics observed: - Underhanded sarcasm and then quickly move on to her 'point' so sarcasm can't be addressed - Avoid answering a direct question - When a valid point is made, change the topic to one you feel in control of - Claim victim status after being verbally aggressive if logic is irrefutable
She also never let him finish a thought and hounded him on every topic. She’s trying to get him to talk enough that he eventually slips up, but then when it’s obvious she isn’t going to get what she wants, she cuts him off and tries again
J Peterson sick old white trash Nazi orbanuskisser: "My message to the Hungarian people: what your Fuhrer is trying to do is to restore the metaphysical foundation of Hungarian nation. Slava Orbánovi! Slava Nazi!"
Actually it's kind of the opposite. But you have to know the answers to their questions, and the reasons they're correct, to understand what Peterson isn't saying. He knows these women aren't evil harpies trying to twist reality into a cock and ball torturporium, and he also knows his audience of (not smart) fans don't know this. In fact, they probably don't even think these woman are like.. normal? Human? Probably think they're Goblins, most likely. So when the women scoff as he pushes back first, and sometimes explains after, he scores a tiny win in the hearts of his fantasy enthusiasts. Then they buy his books and send him money (directly, not smart).
@@Basteal Sick Old Misogynic Jordan Peterson kissing the Nazi Terrorbanus hard for 50 million HUF: "my message to Hungarians: Do not rebel against your Führer! What your prime minister is trying to do is to restore the metaphysical foundation of the Hungarian culturerace"
Equality of Opportunity: I want the ability to start a business Equality of Outcome: I want the same outcome as Bill Gates See why it doesn't make sense now?
That's what feminist do! Feminist ask questions they don't really want the answers to, they interrupt to shorten your answer, they talk over you thinking that's a win because you can't get your point across. That might work on their husbands but in the real world they just look childish.
@@gene8172 ¡Peeero él tiene un buen punto! Sólo con este video puede mantener su argumento por ocho décadas; y yo que pensaba que el Feminismo argentino tomaba riendas muy extremistas.
Watching Jordan repeatedly being interrupted and spoken to in a condescending way is a clear example of “womansplaining” as defined by those that accuse men of “mansplaining”.
Womansplaining doesn't exist in the vocabulary as its not seen as something negative. Being loud and assertive is a sort of vengeance for all the "years of silence". Not being able to vote, not having an influence in politics etc etc. It's simply petty the way feminists acts in a lot of things. I used to call myself a feminist too but I left that shit years ago when I started listening to people who didn't share those beliefs and looked at how the world actually is.
@@Yorikoification Years of silence as if they lived in that era to actually allow them to become loud and assertive towards men in a disrespectful manner. It's not about vengeance, now it's just seen as disrespectful like how people see rude people as disrespectful, they don't have any reason on why they're rude other than their personality.
I've seen MULTIPLE interviews now with Jordan Peterson, and it's incredible that the three same things occur EVERY TIME! 1. They ask him completely stupid, baited questions to try and trap him. 2. They don't listen to what he says, and repeat themselves after the answer was clearly given. 3. They interrupt him, and repeat 1 and 2. It's actually fascinating how calm he stays, and by contrast how stupid, and ignorant the people are that challenge him in an interview.
It is because they already made up their minds and they don't want anything else to hear. You don't really believe in discussion with extremists, do you?
It is clear they already have a preconceived unchangeable view and they just want to get that across in a way that makes them look intelligent and competent to viewers.
It's because they get paid whether the viewer gets really angry or agrees completely with them. The only thing that matters is that someone watched it really
That small dig about them already having 150 million viewers, like they were above him with their legacy media spending many millions for exposure. Where as JP is just a bloke, who's done it alone. I bet he's got a lot more than 150 million views now 😅
You’re gonna have a free therapy session trying to argue with this guy where you will come out a better person and with a better understanding of the world
the problem is he just starts spitting opinion after opinion. they are not trying to give him a platform to deliver his shitty pseudo intellectual crap. Everything he says is charged as fuck. What pisses you off is the fact that people disagree with him, not that they're "interrupting" him, because you've been convinced and lied to to believe that trump fascists like yourself are somehow vilified on the internet. the truth is, he will never defend his points. No conservative will. They'll just complain that they're being silenced when people disagree with them.
What truth?? The one he just spit!! I would've argue with you but apparently i don't have time to waste it on unintellectual human being that happen to be a liberal
When uneducated people talk to a scientist and try to tell them "things". It's just embarrassing. He was very calm; like a nursery teacher listening to 2 kids having a bit of a a tantrum, knowing they'll tire themselves out soon and go for a nap.
I am so grateful to Dr. Peterson for sitting through those interviews, staying calm and bearing those impossible vicious "journalists" interviewing him. Thank you for your words Dr. Peterson you are helping millions.
I didn't see anyone get "dismantled". I saw an annoying host who talks over her guest to push her own ideas. Horrible manners and an even worse host. To put someone who thinks outside the box the way this man does into a room with people who aren't open to reasonable discussion is a waste of all of our time.
What was out of the box in his thinking? "He doesn't think outside the box." He just thinks logically like everyone should, sadly not many actually even think..that's why you think he thinks outside the box when it's just basically common sense.
@0x4A616B7562 no no no sir, I agree common sense isn't common but it's still not thinking outside of the box. It's just basic logically thinking and common sense. As far as the example you said about regulating the pronouns and using improper pronouns for someone who prefers a certain pronoun isnt think outside the box it's called...being respectful or courteous, again common sense. Not so hard to understand.
bobby galyon I think a better definition of how jp speaks to other people would be critically, he focuses on the exact words people use and then makes sure he gets his direct point and ideas across while taking into account every view of his words and the situation
The reason this guy is so popular is because our world has gone mad and he's saying what most of us are thinking but very eloquently
The best part is he has done more to help professional women in the high end workforce than any government.
Ask him about it he'll tell you all about it.
The world is much like it always was: people are running away from responsibility and moral behavior. I think we are just much more aware of it because of the internet and social media. Because people can hide behind anonymity, they express what they really believe more frequently and as such we can see how immoral people really are. I really appreciate that there is at least on person out there campaigning for moral responsibility. I like that Jordan Peterson explains very clearly his REASONS why people should seek to be moral and even "noble" as he puts it, because too much of the dialogue I see online revolves around money, sex, and immediate gratification. He doesn't sound like he's sermonizing, but rather he's arguing for good, common sense so people are armed against life's calamities.
MAD IS BEING TOO KIND.
Absolutely.
Yes, finally someone educated enough to represent COMMON SENSE AND SANITY!
Jordans greatest strength isn't his intellect, it's his patience. My God.
I second that. He sat through that ridiculous attempt at intellectualism and it ended up as a hens talk with Peterson just rubbernecking back and forth...
Kyle Mouttet absolutely
He is amazing at allowing people to speak and allowing people to speak over him and try and put words in his mouth....then shuts them down in one sentence! Very smart man.
I love his views.
You are so right. I admire him for many reasons, but I think you nailed the number one. Listening to feminist drivel for over 50 years, I could never sit there and listen to those insufferable idiots pontificate while Peterson sat there. Does anyone actually interview anymore?
Feminist: "Of course, I'm a feminist. My dress is pink."
*Sets women back 100 years
She was being satirical and ironic. Her statement was not meant to be taken seriously.
@@tuzziosamson3601 trust me, no one is taking her seriously.
There was a roman emperor. He had a brilliant idea of universal clothes for all of the slaves. His advisors told him:" Bad idea. They will understand they are majority".
@@tuzziosamson3601 that's why a lot of people do not take feminism serious. Because it is not serious. You have just proven my point. No chance at argument now.
Feminists claim that the color pink is sexist
He didn’t destroy them, he respectfully corrected their false belief’s by employing facts and research data.
@tomperkins4620 He attempted it. And I doubt he was successful, considering that he was essentially speaking to a brick wall with social justice slogans spray-painted on them. Euphemistically speaking.
I am going to respectfully correct your grammatic belief...it's 'beliefs' in this context.
Agree
...in other words, he DESTROYED them.
@FattyPok fortnite Battle Pass
You ask him a baited question, and then you don't let him answer. Then you reach a conclusion for him. Interesting!
That's the biggest problem with most of the people that try to push these agendas. They're incapable of having an actual intelligent debate. Instead, they just memorize phrases that they don't completely understand and try to shoe-horn them into discussions.
Absolutely
@@Jason-po7on Yup. A lot of university-fed androids.
Just ask them to clarify.
Never forget these fools see this as a power struggle, a war on "oppression", and as the saying goes "all is fair in love and war" they seem to live by this with zero sense of honour or integrity.
A pretty good way to see how the interviewer/show will be is how they refer to Dr Peterson, if they simply call him an academic or his name they are usually against him, If they refer to him as Doctor or professor they are either relatively neutral or in favour of him.
Jordan: Makes a great point on Scandinavian countries
Women: Let’s ignore that
F3minist logic
‘That answer doesn’t paint you in the light I want so we’re gonna move on’
She had no response to that 🤣🤣
Because they see only what they want to see. They protest, shout and scream about everything in the west but then turn a blind eye and don't utter a word when it comes to how eastern countries treat women. This woke, left wing, PC culture is killing the west.
The people of western countries are increasingly losing the right to see and think as they see fit and it's terrifying that it's happening
@@grandadmiralthrawn9231 Actually, most intersectional feminists will tell you that women being abused in Eastern countries does not in any way negate or "cancel out" women being abused differently in western countries. It's not an either/or. Women are abused quite differently depending on the culture, that should be obvious- but you are all missing it, as usual.
Ms. Jordan-a Peterson is saying "since lung cancer is more deadly than breast cancer, breast cancer is not bad at all and people with breast cancer shouldn't whine and bother doctors about it- it's not like they have lung cancer".
Anybody with 2 brain cells to rub together can see that this is a strawman's fallacy.
Unfortunately very few of Ms. Jordan-a Petersons's followers HAVE 2 brain cells and so they miss that entirely. Just because somebody is abused in a different way elsewhere, does not make abuse here okay. duh.
Interviewer: “Do you think your opinion has been misrepresented in the past?”
Jordan: “Yes”
Interviewer: *Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion*
That's Mr. Represented to you.
I dont even call it an interviewer.
Jonathan Vachon so true man, that is a title she doesn’t deserve
Proceeds to misrepresent his opinion almost immediately, kinda ironic. Hate this superficial “gotcha” style of questioning that seems to pervade modern interviews.
💯💯💯
They sound like impatient confident children & he’s the only adult in the room. Many grown & young people I see all around sound like impatient children. We need more of this dude.
Don’t you know that you’re my biggest weakness? It’s okay, it’s alright~ come on baby give into this feeling 🎶
They're mentally undeveloped
I don’t think they listened to one word Peterson said.
Its sad when you only focus on what you are saying, and trying to only get your point across. Rather than trying to understand any counter or reasoning in opposition to your own opinion.
Well thats what feminist do they just throw stuff at you and refuse to learn bc their "beliefs" are "solid"
They're feminists...
Jake Avraham exactly my point. These talk shows are one sided. And the heading of this video is meaningless.
Basically a lot of his interviews
Interviewer:Is a circle a triangle?
Jordan: No
Interviewer: You’re racist
Dayuum,nice one!!!
That’s shapist!!! I’m offended!!!
Isn't this straw-manning his opposition? The same thing that others wrongly do to him at times?
I'm a fan of Peterson (and also a progressive), but it's important to realize when any side of a debate is illogical, not just the side you agree with.
@@NikeMike80 I'm not a shapist! Just a shape realist...
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Let’s not praise him for “destroying” people, but for educating people which is his primary aim.
He’s destroying sjws and feminists
Destruction is usually a good teacher
@@anantaks.s4655 I'd say deconstruction is more on the mark, followed by reconstructing.
Yes, I agree
Well said
What I admire most about Jordan Peterson is his patience when dealing with non-academic people. No way I could be that patient.
Facts, you can see it in his eyes like "why I'm I talking to these unsmart apes"
Non-academic? Those women went to universities too but they are blinded by their ideologies... that's different
@@whocares2465no one can find an intellectual idea by Peterson.
Now days academics are WORSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've watched him dismantle many of those as well...
@@AquaStevae No one can find an intellectual idea by JP
As a woman, my goal in life is to not be ANYTHING like this interviewer.
Off to a good start, that's certainly one of the traits your man would cherish you for.
@@Xlife018 Thanks. Few men seem to notice those of us who are not like this...or maybe they assume we all are? (the sad mgtow and all....)
@@LittleMissHoop Most of them do, yes. And no surprise, because the average person just buys whatever is being sold by the mainstream media.
High quality individuals, who think for themselves instead are not many.
Do you have an Ig or something? I would love to meet a girl like that. :)
Oh, approach in the comment section. *Grabs popcorn*
Suddenly the British accent doesn't sound so intelligent.
Sounds very "naggy" Lol
Trust me we have millions of dumb people over here, these women literally represent the norm
Brilliant.
Lol, this comment made my day :)
sounds like sheeet
"Quick, interrupt him before he makes another good point"
true, I got the same feeling from this.
What makes me laugh is feminists claim this is cis behavior to interrupt so much.
Lmao big facts
@@stardewdaisy4577 Well if you want to compare it's like an adult talking to pair of 5-year-olds. Sometimes they need to be taught.
@@stardewdaisy4577 That's just him being himself, you're misunderstanding. Also if you can't decipher what I'm getting at then it's not worth my time to argue.
It isn’t ‘men’ that I’m speaking to. It’s people. I am a clinical psychologist. I am ACTUALLY interested in INDIVIDUALS. I’m interested in their fortification against tragedy.
You can hear his sincerity as he’s saying these lines.
It's like watching an adult try to explain astronomy to a couple of 3 year old children, who think they are older than you because they were born in January, and you were born in August.
The BeardedFetus 👌👌😂😂😂
perfect analogy
LOL hilarios. Best comment, best name.
Lol....
Smashed it out of the park with that analogy. LOL! You made my day.
The level of passive aggressive energy from the host is cringe on steroids.
mannix flint I’d take a Rancid Cow to bed compared to...... that ... ‘ thing’ any day.....
-''One of our guest of the day is a man you may recognize or maybe you don't'' Wow, wha a kind human being she is. /s
Yeah us Brits are really good at being passive aggressive. She's actually quite bad at it.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I've not even watched the debate, and it's already obvious...
“Are you a feminist?”
“Yes, absolutely i’m a feminist”
*Jordan takes a sip of coffee*
Jordan’s mind: Here we go
I LOVE this comment
Exactly what I thought 😂
here we go again
She says she wears a pink dress because she's a feminist, but isn't feminism about fighting _against_ stereotypes?
@@emberdragon4248 so hypothetically speaking if she is a bit tired and grumpy taht day and standing on a bus/train she wont expect a man letting her take his seat right?
i always suffer watching him in this situation but he brilliantly go through this interviews, a true man to be inspired by.
Feminist's best weapon: Interrupting anyone whos about to dominate them.
Timothy Lalthanmawia not wrong
That’s a very good point, but calling it a weapon is far too much of a compliment. The thing is it’s not even a weapon nor a defense tactic. This feminist constantly interrupting him is the equivalent of a child covering their ears and screaming because they didn’t get their way. She just knows her bullshit argument is not valid or feasible, and that’s very applicable to many of these situations.
Oh I bet feminists love being dominated lol
They're using all the female manipulative tactics in the book. Interrupting, potshotting, teaming up, twisting narratives, and repeat over and over, and got the nerve to act like they're educated.
They want dominance, not equality.
Interviewer: So you are racist and sexist
Jordan: That’s not -
Interviewer: We are out of time
Louie ikr like wtf.
So true 😂😂
yeah the presenter is so rude and set in her beliefs she wont even let Jordan speak
in a fucking nutshell
This but tomorrow's headline will be "Jordan Peterson doesn't deny he's racist and sexist"
Jordan always makes the mistake of thinking most people use logic to make decisions.
Simple truth is I think logic has been curtailed and in its place is this emotionally charged out of control hysteria, I have just finished watching several of his videos so if I am sounding like Jordan I didn't intend to, where logic is more or less a luxury that gets thrown aside whenever the logic isn't working for you but against you. Militant atheism is a classic example of this. If the atheist isn't winning the argument logically then he resorts to troll tactics. I see anti- Christian groups doing the exact same thing in the exact same way. Look at how keyboard jihadis are going after guys like David Wood. It's sad because the whole purpose of logic is to create a method to get at the truth in many ways debaters should be looking forward to being wrong because yeah you had a set back in your conclusions but you got one step closer to the truth even if it's not a truth you would prefer it is still a truth.
@@asgaiyawaya3973 Agree. I call them the emotional mob. They are so emotionally invested in their beliefs, facts and logic are unnecessary. People are guilty until proven guilty, if they do not conform to the neo-marxist views.
It's all frontier justice here on the internet.
Conservative women tend to be more logical. Liberal women , not so much. Having said that , Women will always go the emotional hook if they cannot get their way using common sense.
Time for you men to use their emotion against them. .@@asgaiyawaya3973
JP is right, people always use "their" logic, but they are wrong. It's like making a bad plan.
He said it all with equality of opportunity. That’s very rational. The push for equality of outcome is unreasonable. He’s so intuitive, and correct.
“Hence my pink dress”
Associating colors with genders is a great way to achieve equality I believe
Exactly lmao, if anything her saying that goes against feminist ideology
I’m not a feminist but I think that the world does associate blue with boys and pink with girls, of course girls wear blue and guys wear pink but it’s just a concept that dates back in history.
@@Laurel.m_ak its funny because it was the opposite in history. Blue-Girls Pink-Boys. funny how that works huh
In her defence. That’s actually a specific reference to her former boss Harriet Harman who got flack from feminists for being patronising when she used pink busses and billboards to promote equality for women.
@@Dilkingt0nne And yet that identifies another hypocrisy of the new feminist movement. They speak as though all of them are strongly united, yet are willing to outcast any person who go against the radical left's rhetoric.
Dear women, stop speaking for me. Sincerely, a woman.
Sincerely*
@@x_zerzex7556 I thank you :)
A single name as an exclamation. What unearthly self-confidence is this?
@@Debonair.Aristocrat Don't try to dim my shine.
And for me too🙂❤
"A man you may recognize..or maybe you don't."
Peterson is literally the only person I recognize in this interview
A few days ago, I do not recognize this man.
I do now, and I will give him a 👍🏻
Facts
The way he flinches when she says that
In every way too
Me too
He's such a sweet man. Look how much of a gentleman he is , he stops talking when they interrupt him. Yet they don't share him the same respect allowing him to finish
Every debate Peterson is in looks like he’s the sober guy talking with drunks
Try to watch him debating with Sam Harris or Matt Dillahunty
@@averroes238 Pssh those guys are hacks lol
Yea, haha pretty much. Goodness!
When i'm drunk i turn into a feminist, i love women when drunk and agree with everything they say!!
That is the comment that should be on top!
She seems like she's not listening to what he's saying. She's only paying attention to snippets of his answers that support her views
WomanListening. FeminazisHearing.
Boo Radley that’s facts
Boo Radley typical liberal 😂
She is trying to attack him
Do they ever listen?
*looks at woman*
“are you a feminist”
“yes”
*Jordan takes drink of water* oh boy this gonna be a long one
Oh shit. Here we go again
@Liberty AboveAllElse was it '#yesidohaveacock'?
@Liberty AboveAllElse lol, that's the one, Baz & Mike
i expected *"wHY arE YOu gae?"* xD
Hahaha he must have like a 50/50 outlook on these I interviews. Did you see him smile and laugh a bit when she asked her first question like he was thinking oh ffs
He explains the answer clearly and concisely, she then completely ignores that and then makes her own conclusions 💀 lol
Ignorance is rampant
She looks like an old geezer in a dress 👗 to me
and even proceeds to speak for Jordan.
He's not "promoting his ideas" he's factually and logically reminding everyone what is real and what isnt
They are just ideas unless he can show evidence . Can one person have all the answers to society's problems?....No!
Isn't it sad that he even has to remind people. This world of ours is upside down. Wrong is now right and right is now wrong. How did this happen?
Same with the feminist movement
@@St_AngusYoung tolerance being manipulated by the intolerant.
@@Sandrocker exactly!!
“do you think trans are real women”
"Well, how do you define real women"
"So you don't think they are real women"
He could have messed with their heads by pointing out that everything that exists is "real".
The emptiness inside a cup exist,is it real?.i just wanna know the answer
@@a.bagasm.7253 The cup isn't empty if it has Air inside it. If it has no air , it has light, if it has no light it has gravity acting on on it.
That's *deep* .thanks
@@a.bagasm.7253 You might like this. It blew my mind when I first watched it ruclips.net/video/cDmQINlntJ4/видео.html
The interviewer be like: You are sexist because your name is Jordan Peterson and not Jordan Peterdaughter.
Of course that's a problem too. I SAW A video where woman was saying they are changing words Like why HUMAN has man in it. WHY woman has man in it. Female etccc. WAS SO stupid
@@cambelasben Jesus f*cking Christ 🤦♀️ They're really going out of their way to find a problem. They always say "making progress" and yet they will NEVER be satisfied, its like they're skating up a hill.
@@ParallelElle Its true. Check * Purdue writing guide say avoid use of word man* she is crazy.
Benie please send a link. I want to cringe me to sleep. Thank you
@@conrie0110 I dont know how to send link here. But just search on RUclips.
Purdue writing guide says valid use of word man.
It's on fox news youtube
When Jordan Peterson was asked by the bully in high school "Do your parents know you're gay?" his response was "What do you mean by parents, and what do you mean by gay."
This man is a master at avoiding manipulative questions and showing them for what they are.
i always responded with yes
And not answering them.
There is no point in showing people what they are when they have no self-awareness to recognize themselves in anything including the cleanest and clearest mirror. People don't know they are being manipulative and asking loaded questions. Most people just are not that intelligent. It takes a degree of craftiness to manipulate. They are really more interested in arguing their point of view. While force is manipulation, force is really manipulation with the option of doing anything different severely reduced if not eliminated, meaning they are not manipulating, they are forcing their point of view on others.
You know what’s hilarious?
If roles reversed, a lone feminist with two male hosts talking over her argument, it’d be called mansplaining. But because it’s two feminists talking over a male guests argument, it’s something else.
I love the word "mansplaining" it cracks me up ,it just makes the feminists seem dumber.
It's just projecting, they are almost always the ones womansplaining
They dont like double standards unless they are the beneficiary
yup... that's totaly true...
Well that becomes more of a hot topic . Very very hot one
This literally pains me. Not him, the feminists. My soul cringes every time they interrupt him, his patience is made of titanium.
Its a trigger for me when u are trying to articulate ur point and get hit with another idiotic ideology from these feminist. They don't listen they just yell their points
If that discussion triggers you so much, you are a pretty weak minded individual. Quite pathetic
@@TheWaross He sounds like a perfectly normal person to me. You however come painfully across as a standard issue liberal eccentric with the usual pseudo-moralistic hyperbole. Hope things get better for you, friend.
For real, imagine being a guest in a TV show, then you always become interrupted by the interviewers. Its okay to interrupt someone as long as you know your place and when you should interrupt. The way I see this is the interviewers being so fckn rude most of the time (not always)
uhh women just talk, they don't listen, even if they let you talk they don't listen to you, they actually only think about what they will say after the man finishes and they can't wait until he finishes.. bruh.
Jordan: ,,Man I love spaghetti"
Interviewer: ,,So it is clear that you support Mussolini"
🤣
Jordan: Im thirsty..i need a glass of water.
Interviewer: Hitler drank water...
@@simonlloyd7557 not only that, hitler was 70 percent water!
@@commondirtbagz7130 MEIN GOT!
Hahahahah
They just cannot let him speak, it is absolutely pathetic to watch.
He's far too intelligent to be interviewed by these two.
They think they're smarter you can tell by how they speak and play off his response! Unfortunately they're idiots 😂
@@sarapatch616 you just gave a very good definition of an Idiot.
Here!!here!!
That presenter is one vile odious creature. Makes my skin crawl !
@@JA-ou7nt
Aaah! But by simply criticising her, as an individual, you have shown you are a misogynistic, sexist, bigoted pig. You will be dragged before the Ministry of Truth and re-programmed so you will think exactly as you are told!
I think hes pretty tired of these debates at this point. At least he looks like it.
On his official RUclips channel, his daughter posted an update on his condition. He has been depressed and suicidal lately and he even checked into rehab, if I recall right.
Its always the same old same old. Cant really draw out an answer
Thats because its such a moronic 'debate', especially for an academic to be involved in. Remember this was not his life's mission, it sort of became because he has to constantly defend himself from this insanity.
@@mindegrade3403 what happened bro?
@@vinayvardhanyt2415 we'll have to see what Prof. Peterson has to say. The next update on his channel will be from he himself, according to his daughter.
The most interesting thing here is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and the two trolls.
Uh oh,thats sexist and morally outrageous of u!im ringing the Equality Police,better lawyer up 👍👍😂
Idiots =/= trolls.
The most interesting thing here, Tyrone McDonald, is the genuine intelligence gap between Jordan and Tyrone McDonald. Labeling anyone who disagrees with dr. Peterson as a troll clearly identifies you as an unthinking individual and therefore you have nothing of value to share.
Indeed
Lorraine Connor that’s so sweet Lorraine I’m
Guessing you disagree with Jordan who presents a common logic standpoint and anyone who shares common logic is somehow dumb to you ! Must be why I have over 500 likes on this thread and you are alone.
Im so thankful for men like Dr Peterson and modern stoics like Ryan Holiday for giving young men a solid foundation to grow from. I pray for the next generation coming up behind me and i hope they dont fall in the same traps our generation did
They're not listening. They're trying so hard to paint a bad picture of him that they look dumb doing it.
the woman on the left is a supporter of him. She is listening and liking what he says. When it preaches each others arguments they over ride the others statement to make it facts. The woman on the right ended up shutting down the woman on the left and Jordan because she had no control in the debate and the other 2 saw eye to eye on how society sits
Feminists are dumb by default. Think of a man, and take away reason and accountability.
@@jackknopf5974 i can PARTIALLY agree. I believe women deserve freedom of opportunity and speech. So does that woman on the left, so does Jordan. There are intelligent women who deserve a lot, not many unfortunately but when u see them you shouldn't generalize them
@@CRAZYN1NJA the problem with that statement is that if your siding with those women who claim to be feminists, they are far too ignorant to see that what they are trying to get rid of is that they are just passing it onto men hence them constantly ignoring Jordan. They are an example why feminists are treated the way they are nowadays however there are a small collective of feminists who aren't hypocritical of what they try to debate for
They’re afraid
Saying “Sorry” doesn’t make your interruptions less rude.
Right, it's merely acknowledging, "I caught myself in the act of doing you wrong, but I'm going to go ahead and do it anyway!"
It's like cutting in front of someone in a line and saying sorry. Then not going to the back of the line
Sometimes a person talks a bit much and journalists must interrupt for the sake of time.
@@LisaMaryification ...and sometimes not, as is the case here. Peterson never spoke for more than 15 seconds at a time.
All do is interrupt , at every level of the narrative, they “reword” almost everything he says.🤣
Claims to be a feminist, interrupts Jordan every chance they get so he can’t finish a thought.
Reverse mansplaining??? Nobody thought it was possible until that day
I've always thought that to be the most common feminist attitude... Male or female, shouting and shutting down conversations they don't like is their thing.
Right they also didn’t listen to anything he said!
It's sad that this IS feminism now. These people are ruining what feminism is meant to be. It's all about equality but these morons only want to put men down and make the world soft.
@@kube410 reverse mansplaining is called "bitching".
"Let's keep redirecting the conversation until we can find a gotcha. Damn it, times up."
Jordan Peterson is the only person in this video who doesn’t piss me off
I'm sure if me and you was in the same room i wouldn't piss you off ... 💋🎀👸👸💁💁💁
@@zeni2432 dude wtffff😂😂😂
Jr Diax nah he right
@@crunchyoreos3006 ey no judge k? Cmon man. I like it weird.
@@crunchyoreos3006 yeah obviously 😂
Jordan is speaking several levels of intelligence above the two women here, and they are completely oblivious to it.
He's at least two standard deviations above them, and is basically trying to explain calculus to a toddler.
A classic case of incompetence. To know you are incompetent at level 5 in something you have to gain essentially level 5 to see it
I think they are very much aware of what they are doing and are trying to dumb the conversation down to paint him in a negative light. I think he's significantly more intelligent than they are, but I don't think they are oblivious to it. I do find them to be idiots, but they are doing it on purpose for "hot sound bites".
I could literally see his points flying over their heads
My thoughts precisely. However I doubt that he often does TV interviews with people who approach his level of intelligence or eloquence. The demographic in TV personalities seems slightly narrow and cuts off around 20-30 IQ points short of his territory.
I love how she used her pink dress as proof of her being a feminist. Aren’t gender stereotypes like that something modern feminism is against
I think it was tongue in cheek m8
Well Femenism is like a dress, it's something pink to show, a banner
Exactly I noticed it too and badly wanted Jordan to refute her on that.
@@salaahkhayr2398 why are you pretending she wasn't joking?
She blatently was yet you want to act like she wasn't?
Pathetic
j ap lol I didn’t know feminists makes jokes against there own agendas now.
This is why he currently has over 8M subscribers on RUclips ALONE bruh. Jordan is the GOAT.
“Our next guest is someone you may know or someone you may not” doesn’t that describe literally everyone?
Haha yessir
I am someone you may know, or not know
yeah i was like: "what the fuck kind of introduction is that?"
an introduction that sounded better in her head :)
@@WakoDoodle im pretty sure it was deliberately a bad introduction, thats how leftists are
I have great admiration for Jordan Peterson for how he calmly deals with stupid people.
Me too.
I dont have the will power to do so sadly :(
Nah his tone is calm but you can clearly see he's regretting having to kill his brain cells talking to these two asshats.
@@crablord7934 'LOL' exactly!
Soo true
me too , id say YOU're FUCKED and walk away , LMAO
The patients this guy has... and no, I didn’t misspell that.
Fuck, if I had women like that in my chair, I'd quit 😂
Genius
Lol👌
Made my day
Nisarg Sojitra aw cmon now you guys are making me blush ☺️
I used to be a big fan, but after watching THIS masterpiece, I’m a whole air conditioner
Fooled me in the first half, I have to say.
Copied this from Bali... unoriginal and you added cringe lol
@@leocarvalho8051 name me one thing that isn't considered sexists for the extremists feminist
@@nekogarou7474 extremist feminists
@@leocarvalho8051 you got me there xD
“He jus sold out the theater with 1000 seats”
Joradan:” I’m also sold out the Apollo and it had 5,000 seats”
Feminist:😖
Not everyone can be good at maths, or having integrity.
@@nowaskmehow not my point at all but ok
@@nowaskmehow When Diane (middle name integrity) Abacus was on the show on the forty oneth of Julember, she was shit hot at the old maths stuff. She used a pocket calculator... she had one on each hand!
Older white man selling out the Apollo
Racist
“Stop boasting”
The lady interviewing him is not interested in intelligent discussion, just trying to twist his words and contexts and generally being rude.
Its like when people punch you when you’re already knocked out, she has to win in any sense possible jeez.
Exactly
@Leroy B my guy
@Erick Dias why do you feel it is her job to be disagreeable? If she has the result already loaded, it is not helpful in any way, both sides should be open minded to explore new ways of thinking. This is the biggest problem with left leaning politics these days, no critical thinking. Watch the talks he has with other guests on the Rubin Report and you will see how ideas can develop without pointless drama.
@Erick Dias ruclips.net/video/PagNM_oxssE/видео.html
Needed to continue the interview. Please, is there a a second interview? He will hear one of their comments/arguments, understand their words and multiple possibilities of what they may have meant, unpacks them with "if's" to clarify and although his may or may not be a rebuttal he also explains what is important.
"Im absolutely a feminist, hence my pink dress"
"I thought y'all recently threw a tantrum about pink being a feminine color?"
Apart from that, what does the dress even have to do with anything?!
@@oegoe exactly 🤣
Damn...
"Real women wear black" 🤣
Connor Anderson 😂!! Pink dress stereotypical!!
She asked him if media twists his words and she did the same thing this whole interview.
Jordan: *Starts to explain himself*
Feminist: Interrupts Jordan and starts talking
Would that be called as WOMANsplaining?
Yes that is what is call get it right hunny
@@sexydiva5460 What right sweetheart?
I prefer the old fashioned word “rude” which ironically is the same word I use to describe it when a man does it. Oh look at that...equality.
It should be called cuntsplaining
paleyoCS no
Bravo Mr. Peterson , THANK YOU for your common sense approach to this issues, its very reassuring we have a honest and brave man like yourself speaking out for us , MUCH APPREICATED!
Feminist: womes are not heard
Man trying to explain himself: (feminists interrupt every time he makes a valid point)
(wo)man-slaining?
@@065Tim careful with that one, you might be seen as a misogynist and get canceled by the feminist police
They act as if their own gender gave them the right to interrupt the speech of the other gender. As if their own gender gave them some kind of moral superiority.
@@emberdragon4248 thats exactly how i feel about this.
@@logicalbigbrain426 they can fuck off, we live in a country were we cant express ourselves (logically) because we get shutdown! They say man owns the world but that is rapidly Changing, we have lost our voices. They will laugh at the end if we don't stand up for each other. They don't want equality, they want full control.
My faith in humanity is restored knowing that 95% of these comments are on Peterson’s side. Bravo mankind! Bravo!
I actually hadn’t come across a negative comment
But the problem is 80% of the comments are probably identified as men. It's either women don't want to participate or are not interested the topic itself
@@johnong2655 yeah we rule the world
To be fair, the sample is probably significantly contaminated, seeing that this is a UKIP-related channel with 113K subscribers.
John Ong don’t worry, some women are :)
RUclips tailors your recommendations based on your political beliefs.
“Do you think a Transwoman is a REAL woman??”
Jordan Peterson: “No”
ALRIGHT CUT IT WE GOT THE CLIP
The question itself is so pervert
It's questions like that, that make identity politics such a nightmare because everyone immediately assumes that they have the same beliefs on what a "Real" this, that or the other is.
The way he takes a second to decide to take the hard stance is great
@@arquier they are going against their own agenda. What in the world could be a 'real woman' without offending someone by defining that
cut cut cut
She twists, she turns, she tries to distort his points and misquote him, but he's having none of it. Made her look quite the fool.
The problem is they don’t listen to him to actually respond. They have everything they want to say in their head already and just interrupt him with it when most the time it’s irrelevant and makes no sense.
They keep "womansplaining" him.
They think they know what he’s gonna say too, because they have put him in a box and discriminated against him. But he’s to smart and to quick.
She’s actually making a fool of herself.
This is a case of listening to respond vs listening to understand. (Which I think Jordan does well.)
All western media is run that way
She is not smart enough to realize she is not smart.
Daniel Roth Potent paradox.
man that was said by Charles Manson lol
It is dunning-kurger effect~
It’s a common affliction.
Dunning Kruger effect ! She thinks her cognitive ability is greater than it is.
People are becoming too fragile to accept that their feelings aren’t facts!
Is that a Ben Shapiro reference
That statement is a paradox, in that the people who use it are the ones who are easily triggered 😁
I think this is precisely one of the things feminists are asking ni terms of mentality changes. To stop rationalise everything by facts and numbers all the time and start to accept that feelings intuition and sensibility are things that matter and take a big place in our society and must be taken in consideration on the public and private sphere.
Sorry for my english :)
@@juliusb5404 facts don’t care about your feelings
@@juliusb5404 Without rationalization, we'd still be in the dark ages, calling for our count to feed us more...
We came for clips like these
We stayed for the encouraging words and insight
I also came to admire the way Jordan handles himself and was pleasantly surprised by the majority of comments being supportive of him.
I think JPs biggest strength is his ability to remain calm and articulate his arguments in a very rational manner.
@@skysolitude Exactly. He's combining belief with praxis, contemplation with action, inner and outer life harmony
Especially in the face of emotionally charged females; of both sexes. Men like JP are better, I think than those of us who would have the overwhelming urge to slap a b|+€H.
What arguments? Lol
This woman speaks as if Hillary has never done anything wrong, compaired to Trump's affair. Hillary says things just as rude as he does but these women give her a pass just because she is a woman. Both male and female do things wrong but feminist only see the males wrong but women get a pass just because they are NOT male. Feminist have become the things they started out blaming males for and they are just as wrong as the males were.
He has withheld many a bitchslap and I for one salute his patience.
They just ignored and interrupted him the whole time...
holy shit that was triggering me
As most people with weak arguments do
There feminists what do you expect?
"No, I know what your argument is.(it's what I say it is)"
Because their weak parents and boyfriends allow them to.
She herself says it without realizing, “do you think a trans woman is a *_real_* woman?” She knows the difference between trans woman and *_real_* woman. 🤷🏻♂️
աėšłęÿ his answer: NO 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Fuck me - 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Good point
աėšłęÿ there we go mate
Yeah that was the absolute dumbest baited response I've ever seen. Even before he said it I knew he'd disagree with the term "real," and I knew she'd put words in his mouth.
Most conservatives actually care MORE about transexuals than most liberals, because they care more about ALL people than such liberals. Liberals just use these people for their collectivized political power it comes to identity politics
Good point
This man has become such a historical figure. He is a legend. Someone we absolutely need right now on today’s society. And thank God. The beginning of change in the right direction. Although we have such a long way to go.
Jordan Peterson and standup comedians are the last line of defense against this mad world.
Ben Shapiro?
Scientists?
@@sohamdas8469 they should have that role, yes. But who listens to them? I can bet you $500 that if Bill Burr has a performance with $50 ticket, and next door are the best scientists talking about how to avert global warning for free, Bill would have packed full room, while scientists would be talking to each other.
@@jacksonstandley555 don't know much about him, except for a few videos I've seen. Not enough to have an opinion, unfortunately.
Here here brother
Jordan: “I care about People”
Interviewer: “So what you’re saying is we should all abuse animals?”
Except the lobsters. They are our overlords
how every argument with a woman goes
No but the wasps. Wasps must die.
jesus i cant stop laughing
I just laughed
"That's not my argument."
"Oh, I know what your argument is."
"Yeah, but that's not my argument."
Classic awful "journalism."
Ironically, that just makes it worse. That just translates to "I know your argument, but I'm going to misrepresent it anyway." Can't even claim ignorance.
Xtrendence they also imply that he’s lying. They claim to know his “true” intentions he’s not sharing. They’re just trying in any way they can to discredit him
And it was so nice that he instanly clears this up...
You totally reminded me of a regular conversation my ex-wife and I would have:
Her: This is what you are thinking.
Me: No, I am actually thinking something else.
Her: You are wrong. I know what you are really thinking.
Me: I am pretty sure I know what I am thinking in my own mind.
Her: No, you don't. I know better what you are thinking than you do.
The Batman that’s terrifying. Is that why she’s your ex?
I can't help but admire how he manages to stay calm and seated when confronted with that highly toxic cocktail of ideology, stupidity and entitlement every single time. (I also can't help but wonder how that host managed to get and keep a show...)
He's a very patient man. Those women kept cutting him off.
These women try to make a trap and then they make the headline " Jordan Peterson is a ...." But he didn't fall into this trap
lucky he has had years of listening to people, thank god for Jordan Peterson we needed him so bad
and trying to put words in his mouth so later they can edit it so JP looks like a shmuck.
He let them. Beats me why.
It has to be frustrating. Seemingly every media person invites him on a platform to accuse him of being transphobic or having some hidden agenda. And he keeps repeating to them that his problem was when the Canadian government violated free speech. It sounds so simple, does it not? Being forced to speak a certain way is a violation of free speech. That would be like a law requiring us in the States to address Mexicans in Spanish. The media would play the race card, and make it about racism when it is not."Oh, you won't address the Mexicans in Spanish, and so you must be racist!"
Tactics observed:
- Underhanded sarcasm and then quickly move on to her 'point' so sarcasm can't be addressed
- Avoid answering a direct question
- When a valid point is made, change the topic to one you feel in control of
- Claim victim status after being verbally aggressive if logic is irrefutable
You speak true.
Lmao realized they couldn’t paint him as a transphobe “let’s talk about feminism!”
She also never let him finish a thought and hounded him on every topic. She’s trying to get him to talk enough that he eventually slips up, but then when it’s obvious she isn’t going to get what she wants, she cuts him off and tries again
I legit thought you were talking about Jordan wtf is wrong with me lmaoooo
Broke Dog same I was like wth lol
He didn’t dismantle them. He spoke in a way they did not want to hear. He exposed how shallow they were.
J Peterson sick old white trash Nazi orbanuskisser: "My message to the Hungarian people:
what your Fuhrer is trying to do is to restore the metaphysical foundation of Hungarian nation. Slava Orbánovi! Slava Nazi!"
Actually it's kind of the opposite. But you have to know the answers to their questions, and the reasons they're correct, to understand what Peterson isn't saying. He knows these women aren't evil harpies trying to twist reality into a cock and ball torturporium, and he also knows his audience of (not smart) fans don't know this. In fact, they probably don't even think these woman are like.. normal? Human? Probably think they're Goblins, most likely. So when the women scoff as he pushes back first, and sometimes explains after, he scores a tiny win in the hearts of his fantasy enthusiasts.
Then they buy his books and send him money (directly, not smart).
@@Basteal Sick Old Misogynic Jordan Peterson kissing the Nazi Terrorbanus hard for 50 million HUF:
"my message to Hungarians:
Do not rebel against your Führer! What your prime minister is trying to do is to restore the metaphysical foundation of the Hungarian culturerace"
He dismantled them
He exposed how shallow they were = he dismantled them
A woman is a human adult female, a man in a dress is not a human adult female.
Feminists: can’t look at him in the eyes for a few seconds.
Jordan Peterson: stare into their souls from their eyes.
Indeed.
😂 😂
Well said
The eyes are the windows to the soul
True. Awkward how they avoided eye contact.
Equality of Opportunity: I want the ability to start a business
Equality of Outcome: I want the same outcome as Bill Gates
See why it doesn't make sense now?
Shoegum Wow! You nailed!!!
It Couldn't have been put better
SRSOS go get a job. God bless.
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Fantastic analogy right there !
Poignant
Anyone who interviews JP doesn't actually listen to what he's saying.
Cause that's what they do, they don't listen and criticize you because you don't bow down at their absurdity
I mean you have a very pleasent podcast with Joe Rogan, but yes I don't think thats an interview, more like a simple talk at a bar drinking some beers
That's what feminist do! Feminist ask questions they don't really want the answers to, they interrupt to shorten your answer, they talk over you thinking that's a win because you can't get your point across. That might work on their husbands but in the real world they just look childish.
So what you're saying is....
They did
Jordan looks like Darwin sitting there talking to hominids
Interrupted Jordon every time he spoke, put words in his mouth, criticized his opinions..........feminists.
jamd Pact Sounds an awful lot like conservatives to me....
@@gene8172 ¡Peeero él tiene un buen punto!
Sólo con este video puede mantener su argumento por ocho décadas; y yo que pensaba que el Feminismo argentino tomaba riendas muy extremistas.
@@gene8172 On what planet do you live? These are the traits of liberals, snowflakes, and feminists.
jamd Pact Maybr you’re confused with fascists, misogynists and white supremacists? But, hey, you do you.
@@gene8172 why do you keep bringing up the demoKKKrats? denial? never opened a history book? or your eyes?
Watching Jordan repeatedly being interrupted and spoken to in a condescending way is a clear example of “womansplaining” as defined by those that accuse men of “mansplaining”.
Womansplaining doesn't exist in the vocabulary as its not seen as something negative. Being loud and assertive is a sort of vengeance for all the "years of silence". Not being able to vote, not having an influence in politics etc etc.
It's simply petty the way feminists acts in a lot of things. I used to call myself a feminist too but I left that shit years ago when I started listening to people who didn't share those beliefs and looked at how the world actually is.
@@Yorikoification Years of silence as if they lived in that era to actually allow them to become loud and assertive towards men in a disrespectful manner. It's not about vengeance, now it's just seen as disrespectful like how people see rude people as disrespectful, they don't have any reason on why they're rude other than their personality.
It's worse . They're awful
Are you mansplaining 'womansplaining' 😂
@@dhruvmulani3532 Did you assume his gender?
I've seen MULTIPLE interviews now with Jordan Peterson, and it's incredible that the three same things occur EVERY TIME! 1. They ask him completely stupid, baited questions to try and trap him. 2. They don't listen to what he says, and repeat themselves after the answer was clearly given. 3. They interrupt him, and repeat 1 and 2. It's actually fascinating how calm he stays, and by contrast how stupid, and ignorant the people are that challenge him in an interview.
It is because they already made up their minds and they don't want anything else to hear. You don't really believe in discussion with extremists, do you?
bravo
So you're saying that women can't bait and interrupt men.
It is clear they already have a preconceived unchangeable view and they just want to get that across in a way that makes them look intelligent and competent to viewers.
It's because they get paid whether the viewer gets really angry or agrees completely with them. The only thing that matters is that someone watched it really
That small dig about them already having 150 million viewers, like they were above him with their legacy media spending many millions for exposure.
Where as JP is just a bloke, who's done it alone. I bet he's got a lot more than 150 million views now 😅
You know you’re screwed when he says: “I am a clinical psychologist”
Him saying those words is the equivalent of hearing boss music in a video game.
@@ironduke1377 Touché
You’re gonna have a free therapy session trying to argue with this guy where you will come out a better person and with a better understanding of the world
psychology is pseudoscience
@@Bidwellz9 thats not true
So they going to let him finish?😑
Succ
Of course not. That would be counterproductive to what they're trying to do.
the problem is he just starts spitting opinion after opinion. they are not trying to give him a platform to deliver his shitty pseudo intellectual crap. Everything he says is charged as fuck. What pisses you off is the fact that people disagree with him, not that they're "interrupting" him, because you've been convinced and lied to to believe that trump fascists like yourself are somehow vilified on the internet. the truth is, he will never defend his points. No conservative will. They'll just complain that they're being silenced when people disagree with them.
What truth?? The one he just spit!! I would've argue with you but apparently i don't have time to waste it on unintellectual human being that happen to be a liberal
The problem with ppl like u is u can't prove any fact reflecting his ideas which happen to be true
They literally had no idea what he was talking about the entire time
When uneducated people talk to a scientist and try to tell them "things". It's just embarrassing. He was very calm; like a nursery teacher listening to 2 kids having a bit of a a tantrum, knowing they'll tire themselves out soon and go for a nap.
They dont actually resond to what hes saying they just run through a list of pre determined hot points
They Couldn't hear him...
the saddest thing is that, even if he is correct, they don't care. Doesn't matter. When you guys notice that, this interviews will seem different.
Yep, because they wanted a "gotcha" moment like many journalists.
I am so grateful to Dr. Peterson for sitting through those interviews, staying calm and bearing those impossible vicious "journalists" interviewing him.
Thank you for your words Dr. Peterson you are helping millions.
Absolutely!! 👍
I hate how the reporter repeatedly ignored/refused to answer Jordan’s question about what her definition of a “real” woman is.
Thats because she knows no matter whay she says she's going to piss some people off, she would rather that be towards Jordan. They do it all the time.
I'll recognize a trans woman when they can go through the hell of ovarian cancer like my wife did.
She could not because it all depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. 🤣
@@charleysage5827 yeah and a woman that's had a hysterectomy isn't a real woman then right
@@DMO-DMO-DMO Because the ovaries keep out the Y chromosome? Wtf are you talking about?
“Do you think a wolf is a rock”
- “No!”
“Why not?”
Interviewer: a wold is a rock. Why don’t you recognize the rocks existence?
DYING😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣💀💀💀
Youre my friend now
I honestly can't answer that
Lolll
I didn't see anyone get "dismantled". I saw an annoying host who talks over her guest to push her own ideas. Horrible manners and an even worse host. To put someone who thinks outside the box the way this man does into a room with people who aren't open to reasonable discussion is a waste of all of our time.
Most people are like her, that's the problem.
What was out of the box in his thinking? "He doesn't think outside the box." He just thinks logically like everyone should, sadly not many actually even think..that's why you think he thinks outside the box when it's just basically common sense.
@0x4A616B7562 no no no sir, I agree common sense isn't common but it's still not thinking outside of the box. It's just basic logically thinking and common sense. As far as the example you said about regulating the pronouns and using improper pronouns for someone who prefers a certain pronoun isnt think outside the box it's called...being respectful or courteous, again common sense. Not so hard to understand.
bobby galyon I think a better definition of how jp speaks to other people would be critically, he focuses on the exact words people use and then makes sure he gets his direct point and ideas across while taking into account every view of his words and the situation
@@bobbygalyon5580 I guess in an insane world, Jordan Peterson"s logic and common sense look pretty refreshing.
They totally thought they were setting him up to knock him down... and then it's like "he isn't going down. WHY ISNT HE GOING DOWN??"
I love how feminist want men to stop interupting them but they just interupted him the whole time
1000% correct
Lol
Every. Single. Time.
Thats the only way the dumb and the idiots feel as they're winning. When the stupidity are about to be exposed, they try hard to shut him up
Of course. They want equality until the dinner bill hits the table or the tire goes flat on the highway.