ARM vs. x86: The Future of Computing Power

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • Are you curious about the processors that power everything from your smartphone to your laptop? In 'Battle of the Processors: Understanding ARM and x86 Differences,' we delve into the fascinating world of ARM and x86 architectures. Discover why Apple's M3 chip is a game-changer, how ARM is reshaping efficiency in computing, and why giants like Intel and AMD continue to innovate in the x86 space. This video breaks down their differences in performance, power consumption, and availability, giving you insight into the future of computing. Join us for a deep dive into the world of CPUs and find out which architecture might lead the tech world. Don't forget to share your thoughts in the comments and subscribe for more tech insights
    🔔 Don't forget to hit LIKE and SUBSCRIBE for more insightful tech content, updates, and reviews.
    #m3pro #processor #intel #amd #arm
    Follow Us :
    Twitter:
    / randomtech0
    Telegram:
    t.me/randomtech0
    Instagram:
    / randomtech0

Комментарии • 77

  • @Rudxain
    @Rudxain 8 месяцев назад +83

    I think that in the near-future, ARM will be perfect for general-purpose computing, while x86 will be useful for specialized workloads

    • @StoicPhilosophyyyy
      @StoicPhilosophyyyy 4 месяца назад +11

      Specialised work places and data centres have already shifted to ARM . x86 can only survive if intel survives . If intel chip making fails there is no reason to support x86

    • @Rudxain
      @Rudxain 4 месяца назад +1

      @@StoicPhilosophyyyy good point!

    • @herecuzimbored7057
      @herecuzimbored7057 3 месяца назад +1

      ​@@StoicPhilosophyyyy doubt it, reason data centers might use ARM is its efficiency in non complex workloads. Arm I believe is great for some data centres, office computers/laptops and phones/tablets while anything that might have more complex tasks or need to have good compatibility (x86 is pretty much has backwards compatibility the way back to the very early days). Also 1 thing worth noting, Intel has tried to change architecture before with itanium but it was a disaster and the project was discontinued (tho this architecture wasnt great so makes sense it failed)

    • @bepikz-s2n
      @bepikz-s2n 2 месяца назад +6

      ​@@StoicPhilosophyyyyIntel chips are failing, look at their i9

    • @arjuna4294
      @arjuna4294 2 месяца назад +1

      Never ARM is exceptional for heavy computing 😮

  • @RazOfTheVoid
    @RazOfTheVoid 4 месяца назад +68

    This was a very AI generated video

    • @randomtech0
      @randomtech0  4 месяца назад +17

      The voice only 🙂

    • @Timely-ud4rm
      @Timely-ud4rm 4 месяца назад +5

      It's not as bad as other AI videos. I allready knew what x86/Arm was and this is no cheaply made AI video the voice sure but the script he made is accurate and okay. As much as I love AI people are laziliy using it to make slug content that has no meaning, ever seen those ask a questions videos with an ai response to question. That is more pointless than eating a small rock every day it's what google recommends anyways.

    • @gabrielbiacchi6169
      @gabrielbiacchi6169 3 месяца назад +1

      @@randomtech0 It's actually quite good though. Congrats!

  • @Roach22
    @Roach22 7 месяцев назад +5

    I think Arm will become a major player in high performance desktops in the future, especially seeing every major OS already supports it (Windows, Linux etc.). Even x86 CPUs today breakdown the cisc instructions down to simpler instructions before executing the code. So even Intel is showing that risc is the more performant of the two. RISC doesn't need to do this and hence will have the edge in the future. We just need to see more companies produce higher powered, more performant, but still high efficiency risc CPUs. But then there's also risc-v, which is also promising and cheaper (royalty free) than both arm and x86. The future is looking great!

  • @juddrizzo
    @juddrizzo 3 месяца назад +1

    If they write games to natively run on ARM, can it run games as fast as x86? (Games like half-life?)

  • @ZeroG
    @ZeroG 3 месяца назад +2

    There's a misconception. x86 isn't inherently less power efficient, it's less CPU die efficient (requires a bigger chip). The reason Apple's chips were cooler was solely due to being made on TSMC's better fabs. Make an Intel CPU at TSMC is going to run just as cool.

    • @willb-s1b
      @willb-s1b Месяц назад

      And we will exactly have that tested with Intels new lunar lake series. lets see how the performance will b

  • @niko2002
    @niko2002 6 месяцев назад +36

    x86 chips should remain on desktops, but for laptops, they should start using ARM chips.
    Edit: ARM chips might be the future

  • @chee_wai
    @chee_wai Месяц назад +5

    A lot of talking without saying anything

  • @jakobw135
    @jakobw135 4 месяца назад

    Does Linux run normally or even optimally better on an A.R.M. or X86 architecture?

    • @forgetfulfunctor1
      @forgetfulfunctor1 3 месяца назад

      The tradeoffs are not inherent in the Linux code so much as the compiler that is used, if I understand correctly
      The compiler outputs the instruction set opcodes, i.e. arm vs x86
      I dont know why, but some big companies don't support cross-compiling their products which is crazy to be cause I don't fully understand why. But it shows that there's no straightforward way to translate between architectures

    • @jakobw135
      @jakobw135 3 месяца назад

      @@forgetfulfunctor1 So which does Linux perform BETTER on?

    • @iokwong1871
      @iokwong1871 3 месяца назад

      Linux runs fine on both architectures. It is really built specifically. You can use something like Gentoo to optimize the very CPU you have. But highly NOT recommended if you don't know what you are doing. That said, NOT all software have ARM version or x86 version.

    • @jakobw135
      @jakobw135 3 месяца назад

      @@iokwong1871 I thought those were the only two architectures mostly available.

    • @iokwong1871
      @iokwong1871 3 месяца назад

      @@jakobw135 Even a game handheld that runs on linux, have over 20 variants. given that most of them are some form of ARM. but that's the problem with ARM, there are really no standard like x86 / x 86_64. And on those of those, there are RISC V, MIPS, etc.... Your mile may various for each, but Linux general support an ocean of architecture. LOL

  • @Waldemar_la_Tendresse
    @Waldemar_la_Tendresse 3 месяца назад +8

    It's quite simple: since processors are now present in numerous devices beyond "traditional computers", ARM will win this race, for the sake of energy efficiency.

  • @Panacea9
    @Panacea9 5 месяцев назад +1

    It was coded by one person in 3 months.
    He needed to research it first. He already knew the concepts but he needed to look how to code for it more deeply.

    • @Panacea9
      @Panacea9 5 месяцев назад

      Wasn't done as there wasn't any physical testing done for it yet other than a working demo.
      Optimization isn't there.

  • @Kevin6t8
    @Kevin6t8 18 дней назад

    I'm looking forward to 8K 120fps on ARM on both Apple & Windows!

  • @rinkumultani6515
    @rinkumultani6515 3 месяца назад

    so some think only arm will improve in the future and will take over amd intel cos they will not improve just like arm?

  • @ausmartin1
    @ausmartin1 4 месяца назад +2

    Next do a video WHY ? AMD ARM CPU's are not Energy efficient.
    Please do explain what went wrong vs say a M1.

  • @iokwong1871
    @iokwong1871 3 месяца назад +2

    Generally speaking, this is faulty information. x86 don't inherently custom more power than ARM. It depended on many things. X86 do have more instructions to decode and predict. But that doesn't equal to needed more power automatically. Out of all things, it would be the manufacturer process that makes the big difference.... I mean of course ARM is going be better on power consumption with 4nm when compared to a 10nm x86.......

  • @morten1
    @morten1 2 дня назад

    Yes ARM is the future
    But we are not in the future yet

  • @laszlob3683
    @laszlob3683 2 месяца назад

    what about x64?

    • @lokigh888
      @lokigh888 Месяц назад

      X86 is x64

    • @laszlob3683
      @laszlob3683 Месяц назад

      @@lokigh888 ruclips.net/user/shortss3fqjlEH2UA?si=SYQrl_TFu0RVcwED
      Why does it mention 3 not 2 then arm vs x64?

  • @einstien2409
    @einstien2409 6 месяцев назад

    You should have watched Fireships videos to explain it better.

  • @montassirben8560
    @montassirben8560 4 часа назад

    tnx

  • @primoroy
    @primoroy 4 месяца назад

    Very little REAL INFO! 😢

  • @user-zn1db9fe5w
    @user-zn1db9fe5w 4 дня назад

    Even if intel/amd improve x86 this architecture have no future .

  • @zhuguidai
    @zhuguidai 4 месяца назад +2

    Why ai voice over

    • @Platinum_XYZ
      @Platinum_XYZ 4 месяца назад

      its called text to speech, not ai. still unfortunate though

    • @heian17
      @heian17 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Platinum_XYZ Text-to-speech is AI lol

    • @Platinum_XYZ
      @Platinum_XYZ 3 месяца назад

      @@heian17 text to speech is TTS, not AI. could you share where you got that info from?

    • @Ascoli-dx1ht
      @Ascoli-dx1ht 3 месяца назад

      ​@@Platinum_XYZThis type of TTS uses AI to add impressions

    • @Platinum_XYZ
      @Platinum_XYZ 3 месяца назад +1

      @Ascoli-dx1ht thank you. finally a proper explanation. so it is AI that uses TTS

  • @adibhasan7247
    @adibhasan7247 4 месяца назад

    arm should be the future

  • @techinamul
    @techinamul 6 месяцев назад +5

    Snapdragon X Elite arm ❤❤

  • @atensupe9996
    @atensupe9996 Месяц назад

    Samuel Groft lead ARM

  • @Nygar1
    @Nygar1 3 месяца назад

    X86 is outdated architecture it's been out since 1970s . Arm is superior but nobody with exception of Apple Qualcomm are developing chips. Think biggest roadblock most applications for business and gaming is x86 . Now that they are starting to make emulation for x86 to be run on Arm might not be much longer before ARM Rand D explodes and we see the industry as a whole shift to Arm.

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute Месяц назад

      the industry hasnt shifted to arm because arm is just too specialized, the instruction set is what makes x86 palpable. ARM is fantastic for mobiles and integrated technology, but doesnt come close to bringing what x86 is able to bring.

    • @X10Z24
      @X10Z24 Месяц назад

      ​@@dogsbecuteit's like switching from gas vehicles to electric vehicle. it will take them atleast a decade for half of the world to switch from x86 to ARM.

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute Месяц назад

      @@X10Z24 Hopefully longer. A lot of power users arent interested in ARM.

  • @flysolo7089
    @flysolo7089 5 месяцев назад +1

    ARM is future....

  • @adampatni6219
    @adampatni6219 4 месяца назад +1

    lol the immigrants tshirt - that's why

  • @Elam51
    @Elam51 6 месяцев назад +9

    ARM Is trash

    • @koek4539
      @koek4539 5 месяцев назад +3

      Why?

    • @Myname-l3h
      @Myname-l3h 4 месяца назад +3

      @@koek4539 just check his avatar

    • @koek4539
      @koek4539 4 месяца назад

      @@Myname-l3h LOL

    • @X10Z24
      @X10Z24 Месяц назад

      ​@@koek4539he aint wrong tho even though hes obviously ragebaiting, arm is pretty trash currently outside of just works, not every programs or games are compatible with ARM currently

  • @hugovdz
    @hugovdz 4 месяца назад

    Woke ..

  • @miay1838
    @miay1838 Месяц назад

    ARM is shite. Just keep it to normal x86 where you actually get performance AND compatibility. It also doesn't swallow your RAM memory if you're using graphical stuff.