Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Lagrangian vs Eulerian Descriptions of Fluid flow (Animation)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
- This animation videos describe the fundamental of Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions.
Lagrangian description deals with the individual particles and calculates the velocity,acceleration,position or other parameter of each particle separately. whereas in the Eulerian description of fluid flow, a finite volume called a flow domain or control volume is defined, through which fluid flows in and out.
One of the most underrated video related to fluid dynamics . This video having good explanation about both approaches.
Wow, thanks!
It is very easy to understand!I'm not good at English, but I'm glad I came to listen to this English video!
Thank you!
Excellent job and animation. Thank you!
This was an excellent video, thanks so much!
Very clear explanation❤
OMG,this is absolutely fantastic visual explaination!!! Thanks
omg, thank you so much, you make it more clear !! love youuu
Nice explanation with an excellent animation.
Thank you - this was very helpful!
Excellent video madam...with ur permission i wil use this video to show my student... education purpose
Where is next part? Do you have the whole Fluid Dynamics animation video??
Just love this video. So easy and very good video. Appreciate your work
Great video!
Great explanation mam. Thank you so much
Great job
How to visualize control volume of euler?
Video is much helpful thanks
WLC ^^
Which software do you use to make such beautifull animations? One hour of a lecture in 10min . Amazing way to explain rom simple to complex
Arigato , Itachi-sama
thank you madam .
王zh看到点个赞😀
Very nice madam
Thanks for uploading this video, for some extent i understood, once i see it again i am sure i will get. Waiting for remaining part. One more Request please make a video for (Reynolds transport theorem) please, please
sure I will .. Right now I am working on Material Derivative.. After that it will be Reynolds TT ^^ .
@@NiLTime thank you 🤗
there is a mistake 18 is suppose to have an x component in it I think.
yeah it is 18xyt not 18y^2t
Ooph, the narrator… I’ll go find another video
No is correct the example in 7.20 min.
The correct is 18xyt , no 18y2t
Sorry, only checked.
where is it come from? for the first derivative (left sidr), d i/dt is just del3xy/dt isnt it? shouldnt it be zero?
it doesnt have t component
while for d j/dt is correct d6yt/dt resulting 6y
So Itachi just helps me get stronger without killing my parents, cool.
Pef places