you are so talented i love this bracelet if i could id buy it and other creations ....awesome...what patience for details plus very precise teaching also but ive commented many times...lol...happy trails...
When I was doing Persian chainmaille, I had a mantra going. Front to back, twist & through, close. Because it took me about 20 dismantlings to get the bracelet right, I'm sure I was saying it in my sleep.
Wonder what it would look like with alternating black and white rubber rings for a kind of zebra effect. Also, can you explain how you would keep the rainbow colours correct if you had a shorter bracelet because, surely the rainbow is a seven colour repeat. And how does the divisible by three work in that case. I think that is the part I can’t get my head around … and the difficulty in seeing those black rings at times.
I'm not sure if someone put it here or not, but I just want to let everyone know, much like Yvonne thought might be the case, you don't actually need your units to be divisible by 3. I just finished making a bracelet with this weave and mine is 43 units of 18 gauge 3/16. I didn't really experience any issues, other than it was a new weave to me.
I literally just finished making this, put it on, adjusted the rings to lay flat, slipped it off and a rubber ring snapped... I'll fix it when my fingers stop throbbing lol!
Chainmail patterns are typically interchangeable based off the Aspect Ratio, or AR. A quick Google search brought up an AR conversion chart. In this case, a 16 gauge wire with an inner diameter of 1/4 has an AR of 3.9. Looking at the chart we see that a 20 gauge wire with an inner diameter of 1/8 has an AR of 3.7, and an inner diameter of 9/64 has an AR of 4.1. Since neither of these are a perfect match, yet are close enough to the AR 3.9 of the original pattern, they should still work. The 3.7 AR would just be a tighter weave while the 4.1 would allow more movement with the rings. There are patterns that don't offer any wiggle room on AR, but this one seems forgiving enough. Hope this helps!
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
Love to see a tutorial with the sea beads and German silver rings
I miss these chainmaille videos!!
Lol I love you von….”did I just imagine that or did I test it??” Lol
The bracelet you have done in this tutorial is beautiful
I love the click the ring makes as you close it. Sooo satisfying.
I would LOVE a tutorial on the beaded alligator back :) The stretchy bracelets are so well loved where I live so thanks for this tutorial!
I would LOVE a tutorial on the beaded alligator back with the green beads
Excited for a tutorial for the beaded bracelets.
Would love to have video on doing it with beads.
Pretty. I miss chainmaille too.
Thank you so much for these tutorials.
you are so talented i love this bracelet if i could id buy it and other creations ....awesome...what patience for details plus very precise teaching also but ive commented many times...lol...happy trails...
When I was doing Persian chainmaille, I had a mantra going. Front to back, twist & through, close. Because it took me about 20 dismantlings to get the bracelet right, I'm sure I was saying it in my sleep.
I would love to know how to do the bracelet with the beads on it please
howdy,learning alot from your tutorials and I was wondering if you do arm bands like the ones in the fantasy movies...
would luv to see the sead bead one.sad i live in Canada or i would order a kit
You can get the kit that she showed on Amazon, it's down in the description.
Must watch replay. Thx.
Wonder what it would look like with alternating black and white rubber rings for a kind of zebra effect. Also, can you explain how you would keep the rainbow colours correct if you had a shorter bracelet because, surely the rainbow is a seven colour repeat. And how does the divisible by three work in that case. I think that is the part I can’t get my head around … and the difficulty in seeing those black rings at times.
There are 42 bundles of the silver & rubber rings. & into that goes 6 times. I have trouble sometimes getting my head around chainmaille too.
Did you ever do the beaded alligator back tutorial?
Yes....Tutorial please 💜
Omg there are so many projects and techniques I want to try! This is why Tarah stays up until 3am. 🤦🏻♀️
YAY!!!! I am so excited.
Looking forward to this! 🤗
I'm not sure if someone put it here or not, but I just want to let everyone know, much like Yvonne thought might be the case, you don't actually need your units to be divisible by 3. I just finished making a bracelet with this weave and mine is 43 units of 18 gauge 3/16. I didn't really experience any issues, other than it was a new weave to me.
Would like tutorial
Amazing!
13:39 I'm going to poop right there 😂
I literally just finished making this, put it on, adjusted the rings to lay flat, slipped it off and a rubber ring snapped... I'll fix it when my fingers stop throbbing lol!
Where do you buy your rings? Or do you make them?
You can get them at TheRingLord
I’m a bit daunted by chain mail, but I want to learn. I have a few guy friends who’d probably wear these.
Any tips on how "small" of a gauge/diameter you could do for the stretchy version? I'd like to make one that's a bit more dainty.
Chainmail patterns are typically interchangeable based off the Aspect Ratio, or AR. A quick Google search brought up an AR conversion chart. In this case, a 16 gauge wire with an inner diameter of 1/4 has an AR of 3.9. Looking at the chart we see that a 20 gauge wire with an inner diameter of 1/8 has an AR of 3.7, and an inner diameter of 9/64 has an AR of 4.1. Since neither of these are a perfect match, yet are close enough to the AR 3.9 of the original pattern, they should still work. The 3.7 AR would just be a tighter weave while the 4.1 would allow more movement with the rings. There are patterns that don't offer any wiggle room on AR, but this one seems forgiving enough. Hope this helps!
Oh, It's a gay price bracelet.
I’m a bit daunted by chain mail, but I want to learn. I have a few guy friends who’d probably wear these.