03: Reliability and validity (1/3)

[@cams1904]

You're infinitely better at explaining this topic than my professor. Thank you, and excellent analogies.

[@leahfernandes6751]

Is kuder richardson reliability a type of reliability? ??

[@yangamdletshe8785]

great lecture

[@jessg691]

Very helpful. Thank you very much

[@JohnDoe-vz6zi]

nice

[@kasunwanigasooriya829]

Thank you

[@toxictonic5963]

thanks for the lecture. .. can u please speak at a normal pace ?? why are u in a hurry to finish the lecture? you are fast

[@amandahenkel594]

settings-->speed--> 0.75 or 0.50

[@Keticinc]

very interesting but could you please speak a bit slower? :)

[@baghdeda]

settings-->speed--> 0.75 or 0.50

[@stephenprice3357]

Anybody else notice how he never talked about validity?

[@emilypaxman602]

This is only part 1 of 3. I believe validity is addressed in the other parts.

[@goldensperm7182]

Stephen Price ur an idiot

[@nawzirilarazan8831]

get a new mic

[@toxictonic5963]

I agree .... initially I thought there's a problem with my ear phones... but your comment has cleared my doubt .