The video only covers some aspects which should be given a thought before you are going to select any OS and so accordingly the winner of the debate is decided in the video. But still there are many things to be considered before choosing an OS but are not mentioned in the video (which will make this video much longer & the purpose to give you awareness in lesser time will not be fulfilled), so keep in mind that you have to choose OS for yourself based on your own needs and priorities, this video only discuss some popular aspects which people usually look forward to before choosing an OS.
The video is in such a organized way, that you can clearly understand the reason for choosing LINUX or WINDOWS according to your personal preferences🥰🥰
I was on Windows 10. Yeah it wouldn't let me upgrade and I was getting tired of it anyway so I installed Linux Mint on one computer and kept the other computer on Windows 10. Just in case. Haven't even turned on the computer that still has Windows 10 in over 60 days but I'll keep Windows 10 installed on it....for now.
I did something similar which is Dual Booting Linux and Windows 10, I did it months prior as soon as they announced Microsoft Copilot, plus my other reason is that I don't have enough memory on one hard drive to update any further
Very similar here. I have a backup Windows PC, separate to my main one which I moved to Linux Mint a few months ago. After a couple of months, I realised I hadn't switched on the Windows PC for a while. It spent 10 minutes updating and then decided I could no longer access my OneDrive Personal Vault via the file manager (not a problem two months earlier). Bye Windows.
@@kjejon1 Sure it is perfectly fine to be used, but still most popularly used one is Windows because of it's simplicity and availability of mainstream applications.
Yeah... but realistically, how long is it before you start using grep to dig around in source code and fix something? Most computer science majors only have an abstract concept of doing these things... I'm guessing if you're not doing it already, you can figure it out in 10 minutes.
The answer is if you have brain cells Linux if you don't like me and just want to play the game Windows I'm not learning command lines I'm not learning CMD not doing any of that give me a UI and I'll click the button that says play
The uploader has clearly not used Linux enough or hasent used linux in the last 5 years. 1. Gaming - Gaming is coming a long way with most games being click and play. Proton and the Steam Deck are pushing Linux gaming forward. 2. Software Support - I dont know whats so hard to just A. open the distros store B. search for the program you want C. click install. Also theres a load of "mainstream" apps that work natively on Linux and for those that dont, there's WINE
Nah, you don't need any other antivirus software on Windows. Microsoft Defender is good enough. Just turn on all the features and you're set. If you think it's not enough, you're probably the kind of person who downloads shady stuff from the internet. Also, you can find Windows keys online for cheap, so it's totally fine. You pay once and you can upgrade to the latest Windows version and your key will work forever.
Microsoft Defender is a good antivirus option for many users, but for those who download third-party apps or browse less secure sites, extra protection may be useful, that "extra protection" is offered in Linux. Also, buying cheap Windows keys from unauthorized sources can lead to issues like revoked licenses. It’s best to purchase software through legitimate channels to stay safe.
is windows really wins the user interface & experience section, really? every major de would beat windows's ass without a doubt. so with a most basic example, how do you download an app on linux or in windows? which one is more user friendly? or updating a software, on windows you either see a notification to update that application or when launch starts application asks "can i update my software, pls?" and you are waiting for the use that application until finishes. on the other hand every linux distro updates packages and apps on launch if you prefer that way. windows does not have a good user experience at all. with all preinstalled and uninstallable apps, with shitty update cycles that ruins your maybe entire work on that day, with laggy experience if you are using 5+ year hardware, with shitty system apps remained from windows xp like drivers, run, system monitor apps even without dark mode... when you search something on explore section if there is nothing found on your local it automatically searchs it in microsoft edge, how this can be a good user experience? i didn't even count copilot cuz' when i was using windows there was no copilot at all. so i don't know what does it make that much. long story short if you are get boned to windows workflow that doesn't make it user friendly. there are a lot more habits that people boned to and they are not user friendly too. i may seem unnecesarily mad but my madness cames from that this video contains informations that was true maybe like 6-7 years ago. rn you don't have to tread off anything like user experience, application support etc. to switch on linux. there is really a little applications that insists on not to support linux and they are microsoft office and adobe cloud. other than all aps works just fine like steam, epic games, discord, slack, spotify, your fav browser, obsidian and notion, microsoft vscode, blender, davinci resolve, obs, reaper, all emulators, vlc and any other apps that you can think off. and if that app doesn't support linux there is a huge percentage that it works with wine. even nvidia works fine on linux rn. especially in 2024 there is no excuse left to switch linux except that "adobe and microsoft softwares doesn't run on linux?" issue. games works on linux very well, i think you have to checkout that.
That being said, my point about Windows being better in terms of UI was based on its out-of-the-box simplicity and ease of use for the average user who may not want to spend time customizing their desktop. Windows has a standardized interface that’s widely used and understood, which can be a key factor in user experience for those who prioritize a 'plug-and-play' setup. Ultimately, what’s 'better' comes down to what the user values more - whether it’s ease of use or maximum control over the interface When it comes to gaming, while Linux has made tremendous strides, especially with Steam’s Proton and better support for drivers, Windows still tends to be the default for many game developers, which can result in more reliable performance and broader compatibility for a wider range of titles. However, for those who are comfortable with workarounds like Wine or Proton, Linux gaming is now a very viable option.
Usually, I use Linux, but sometimes, maybe once or twice a year, I need to use a program avaiable only on Windows, so I have both sustens in one of my computers.
There was major error in video. Windows is not what developers love. Let me explain: What is the current status in software, Microsoft made colossal mistake back 90s. They had huge market position but instead of standardizing stuff, they choose greedy route. Details were kept secret and they put expensive price tag to native development tools. Microsoft stock skyrocketed for sure but all the brightest developers that made startups since late 90s see though that and they didn't want to build their business that is based on royalties to Microsoft. What happened is that Microsoft lost whole generation of developers to open source stack and even Sun Microsoft strategy worked better and Java gained popularity. Microsoft was left to older, previous generation established companies that were already adopted DOS/Windows. To make situation even worse, Microsoft was always late to embracing web technologies. Today there is literally million software available for FREE. Stuff that we could only dream back in 90s, and easiest way to use those is build software top on Linux. That is caused that people with programming skills use all technology for free and they build businesses, and then there are plebs using Windows and they pay subscriptions to use tech.
You make an interesting point about how Microsoft's approach in the 90s led many developers toward open-source solutions. It's true that open-source technology has gained massive traction, providing developers with powerful tools for free, especially in areas like Linux and Java. However, it's also important to recognize that Microsoft has made efforts to embrace open-source in recent years, with initiatives like the acquisition of GitHub and the development of cross-platform tools like .NET Core. It's fascinating to see how both proprietary and open-source ecosystems have evolved, each offering distinct advantages.
That is caused that people with programming skills use all technology for free and they build businesses, and then there are plebs using Windows and they pay subscriptions to use tech. that is a so fcking awesome sentence at all
If you can program in a language like C++, Java, Python and etc, or even became proficient in Powershell or Batch, you should at least try Linux. For everyone else who doesn't play games, try MacOS. For the gamers I haven't yet mentioned, Windows.
Linux had a reputation for being difficult to use, only accessible to highly technical users. However, distributions like Linux Mint are designed to be user-friendly, making Linux accessible to everyday users without needing expert skills.
Linux Mint is not the only distribution Linux have, so you cannot judge whole Linux based thing on a single distribution which was designed to be user friendly, while there are bunch of distributions still out there that require technical knowledge to operate.
@@technetiumm tell me "non user friendly" distro that is not based on arch and has community support, i guess you can't say. you just saying the words that everyone just memorized for decades but these things are not true anymore. get updated my friend. on the other hand debian, ubuntu, zorinOS, elementaryOS, linux mint, fedora, popOS, open suse and many more distros has a really beginner friendly features to adapt easily. how can you aclaim that linux mint is easy to operate but many other distros don't. linux mint only standardize your DE experience with limiting your customization and it is not only example of it. there are zorinOS, elementaryOS and popOS too that has advanced DE customization to make distro to work more user-friendly.
Think about that some might lack a confidence to talk in public, even if that's a video, or do not deem own voice suitable for narration. Who knows...this voice over however wasn't as bad as others and the video has SOME truth in it, even if it isn't correct entirely or didn't fully disclose everything.
Windows 10 and 11 are both objectively better than any Linux distribution. Oh and Linux being secure....LOL...that IS a fable. A false one as well. It's an Emmentaler cheese of new and very old vulnerabilities and bugs from kernel to DEs, applications, graphic stacks, windowing protocols, etc...
Respect your opinion mate but, calling Linux a ‘security cheese’ is a bit of a stretch. Linux benefits from being open-source, where vulnerabilities are often patched faster than on proprietary systems like Windows. In terms of security, Linux excels with its permissions system, being less targeted by malware, and its customizability. As for Windows 10/11 being "objectively" better, it really depends on the use case. For servers, privacy, and open-source flexibility, Linux often comes out ahead. btw, thanks for the LOL moment - gotta love a good Emmentaler cheese reference though.😅
@@technetiumm " vulnerabilities are often patched faster than... " --- when there is someone for it. You have no idea about the amount of still unsolved serious vulnerabilites in every layer of Linux (from kernel up to user space, in everything), many of those no one cares about anymore (no person to patch available). I advice not to research it too deep either, it's a scare for life. Linux can be (and should be) hardened for added security by the user, if someone is technically inclined and has a lot of times, yes, and there are publications for it to help that, but Linux is not automatically more secure. That's a cute myth coming from the lower amount of targeting.
And Windows was famous that they didn't fix security holes because it would break compatibility, so they left security holes wide open and fixed things on service pack (and that break stuff). In reality there isn't much of difference in vulnerabilities because almost all Linux distributions and Windows are made similar development process. What makes difference is that Linux based operating systems allows much better to strip off extra functionality and make minimal OS dedicated for task, and removing all unnecessary code where security holes might exist. That is where Linux based operating systems wins Windows easily. This feature together with that Linux is defacto standard on servers, most of the computer infrastructure runs on Linux. Not Windows 10 or 11.
Linux is faster and you can do pretty much whatever you want on it. Also Microsoft is spying on Windows. If you capture your internet packages you can find some packages going to Microsoft. And you are mostly safe on both if you dont download things that you dont know. On Linux you can use nearly any program that you can use on Windows but if the program's creator decides to remove it you cant use it on Windows (like adobe flash or paint 3d). I like paint 3d its easy to use but Microsoft is going to remove it. Windows' only point is gaming, Linux can be harder to use but there is always a solution to your problem on the internet.
The video only covers some aspects which should be given a thought before you are going to select any OS and so accordingly the winner of the debate is decided in the video. But still there are many things to be considered before choosing an OS but are not mentioned in the video (which will make this video much longer & the purpose to give you awareness in lesser time will not be fulfilled), so keep in mind that you have to choose OS for yourself based on your own needs and priorities, this video only discuss some popular aspects which people usually look forward to before choosing an OS.
The video is in such a organized way, that you can clearly understand the reason for choosing LINUX or WINDOWS according to your personal preferences🥰🥰
Yes i made sure to do that.
I was on Windows 10. Yeah it wouldn't let me upgrade and I was getting tired of it anyway so I installed Linux Mint on one computer and kept the other computer on Windows 10. Just in case. Haven't even turned on the computer that still has Windows 10 in over 60 days but I'll keep Windows 10 installed on it....for now.
I did something similar which is Dual Booting Linux and Windows 10, I did it months prior as soon as they announced Microsoft Copilot, plus my other reason is that I don't have enough memory on one hard drive to update any further
Very similar here. I have a backup Windows PC, separate to my main one which I moved to Linux Mint a few months ago. After a couple of months, I realised I hadn't switched on the Windows PC for a while. It spent 10 minutes updating and then decided I could no longer access my OneDrive Personal Vault via the file manager (not a problem two months earlier). Bye Windows.
Well, I don't have a degree in computer science, writing this using Arch Linux, have used for several years, it's perfectly fine.
@@kjejon1 Sure it is perfectly fine to be used, but still most popularly used one is Windows because of it's simplicity and availability of mainstream applications.
Yeah... but realistically, how long is it before you start using grep to dig around in source code and fix something? Most computer science majors only have an abstract concept of doing these things... I'm guessing if you're not doing it already, you can figure it out in 10 minutes.
MAN YOUR VIDEOS ARE ON TOP!!!😮💨🥶
Thanks man
Your videos are addictive asf!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sure they are😅
I concur doctor.
We can use wine to run .exe file in linux
@@AnimeZNT_15 That's what I said in the video that, you need a bit of creativity to run mainstream applications on Linux.
@@technetiumm I mean proton has a lil bit bug but I don't faced any problem when I just use "wine file.exe" from terminal
❤❤❤❤😍😍
You can use proton in linux just like a steam deck
Just dual boot them and choose them for the things you're trying to do
or make a virtual machine for the other one and see which you enjoy better.
The answer is if you have brain cells Linux if you don't like me and just want to play the game Windows I'm not learning command lines I'm not learning CMD not doing any of that give me a UI and I'll click the button that says play
@@mathewbriggs6667 You summarized it for me🤜
The uploader has clearly not used Linux enough or hasent used linux in the last 5 years.
1. Gaming - Gaming is coming a long way with most games being click and play. Proton and the Steam Deck are pushing Linux gaming forward.
2. Software Support - I dont know whats so hard to just A. open the distros store B. search for the program you want C. click install. Also theres a load of "mainstream" apps that work natively on Linux and for those that dont, there's WINE
Another plus for Linux - you have full control over the apps/programs that run in it.
Yes that's the flexibility offered by Linux.
@@technetiumm The final straw with MS Windows was the TPM req. and Recall
Nah, you don't need any other antivirus software on Windows. Microsoft Defender is good enough. Just turn on all the features and you're set. If you think it's not enough, you're probably the kind of person who downloads shady stuff from the internet. Also, you can find Windows keys online for cheap, so it's totally fine. You pay once and you can upgrade to the latest Windows version and your key will work forever.
Microsoft Defender is a good antivirus option for many users, but for those who download third-party apps or browse less secure sites, extra protection may be useful, that "extra protection" is offered in Linux. Also, buying cheap Windows keys from unauthorized sources can lead to issues like revoked licenses. It’s best to purchase software through legitimate channels to stay safe.
@@technetiumm Exactly what I said. Shady stuff from the internet.
@@GreatBlackHat Yep I agree with you on that one!!
is windows really wins the user interface & experience section, really? every major de would beat windows's ass without a doubt. so with a most basic example, how do you download an app on linux or in windows? which one is more user friendly? or updating a software, on windows you either see a notification to update that application or when launch starts application asks "can i update my software, pls?" and you are waiting for the use that application until finishes. on the other hand every linux distro updates packages and apps on launch if you prefer that way.
windows does not have a good user experience at all. with all preinstalled and uninstallable apps, with shitty update cycles that ruins your maybe entire work on that day, with laggy experience if you are using 5+ year hardware, with shitty system apps remained from windows xp like drivers, run, system monitor apps even without dark mode...
when you search something on explore section if there is nothing found on your local it automatically searchs it in microsoft edge, how this can be a good user experience? i didn't even count copilot cuz' when i was using windows there was no copilot at all. so i don't know what does it make that much.
long story short if you are get boned to windows workflow that doesn't make it user friendly. there are a lot more habits that people boned to and they are not user friendly too.
i may seem unnecesarily mad but my madness cames from that this video contains informations that was true maybe like 6-7 years ago. rn you don't have to tread off anything like user experience, application support etc. to switch on linux. there is really a little applications that insists on not to support linux and they are microsoft office and adobe cloud. other than all aps works just fine like steam, epic games, discord, slack, spotify, your fav browser, obsidian and notion, microsoft vscode, blender, davinci resolve, obs, reaper, all emulators, vlc and any other apps that you can think off. and if that app doesn't support linux there is a huge percentage that it works with wine. even nvidia works fine on linux rn.
especially in 2024 there is no excuse left to switch linux except that "adobe and microsoft softwares doesn't run on linux?" issue. games works on linux very well, i think you have to checkout that.
agreed. no one in their right mind would say windows desktop experience is better. when DEs like kde plasma exist
That being said, my point about Windows being better in terms of UI was based on its out-of-the-box simplicity and ease of use for the average user who may not want to spend time customizing their desktop. Windows has a standardized interface that’s widely used and understood, which can be a key factor in user experience for those who prioritize a 'plug-and-play' setup.
Ultimately, what’s 'better' comes down to what the user values more - whether it’s ease of use or maximum control over the interface
When it comes to gaming, while Linux has made tremendous strides, especially with Steam’s Proton and better support for drivers, Windows still tends to be the default for many game developers, which can result in more reliable performance and broader compatibility for a wider range of titles. However, for those who are comfortable with workarounds like Wine or Proton, Linux gaming is now a very viable option.
@@technetiumm still same. Linux still has better desktop. All it lacks is compatibility.
Usually, I use Linux, but sometimes, maybe once or twice a year, I need to use a program avaiable only on Windows, so I have both sustens in one of my computers.
There was major error in video. Windows is not what developers love. Let me explain:
What is the current status in software, Microsoft made colossal mistake back 90s. They had huge market position but instead of standardizing stuff, they choose greedy route. Details were kept secret and they put expensive price tag to native development tools.
Microsoft stock skyrocketed for sure but all the brightest developers that made startups since late 90s see though that and they didn't want to build their business that is based on royalties to Microsoft.
What happened is that Microsoft lost whole generation of developers to open source stack and even Sun Microsoft strategy worked better and Java gained popularity. Microsoft was left to older, previous generation established companies that were already adopted DOS/Windows. To make situation even worse, Microsoft was always late to embracing web technologies.
Today there is literally million software available for FREE. Stuff that we could only dream back in 90s, and easiest way to use those is build software top on Linux.
That is caused that people with programming skills use all technology for free and they build businesses, and then there are plebs using Windows and they pay subscriptions to use tech.
You make an interesting point about how Microsoft's approach in the 90s led many developers toward open-source solutions. It's true that open-source technology has gained massive traction, providing developers with powerful tools for free, especially in areas like Linux and Java. However, it's also important to recognize that Microsoft has made efforts to embrace open-source in recent years, with initiatives like the acquisition of GitHub and the development of cross-platform tools like .NET Core. It's fascinating to see how both proprietary and open-source ecosystems have evolved, each offering distinct advantages.
That is caused that people with programming skills use all technology for free and they build businesses, and then there are plebs using Windows and they pay subscriptions to use tech.
that is a so fcking awesome sentence at all
❤❤❤❤
Upload a new video about wi fi hacking method
@@NomiiRider-jw3bt More like securing WiFi Networks!
If you can program in a language like C++, Java, Python and etc, or even became proficient in Powershell or Batch, you should at least try Linux. For everyone else who doesn't play games, try MacOS. For the gamers I haven't yet mentioned, Windows.
Game support for Linux is in a better spot than ever with Steam, wine and Lutris. In my case, Linux was the better option for gaming.
I installed Linux Mint. It's been very easy to use. I certainly don't have "a degree in computer physics". Lazy nonsense.
Linux had a reputation for being difficult to use, only accessible to highly technical users. However, distributions like Linux Mint are designed to be user-friendly, making Linux accessible to everyday users without needing expert skills.
Linux Mint is not the only distribution Linux have, so you cannot judge whole Linux based thing on a single distribution which was designed to be user friendly, while there are bunch of distributions still out there that require technical knowledge to operate.
@@technetiumm tell me "non user friendly" distro that is not based on arch and has community support, i guess you can't say. you just saying the words that everyone just memorized for decades but these things are not true anymore. get updated my friend.
on the other hand debian, ubuntu, zorinOS, elementaryOS, linux mint, fedora, popOS, open suse and many more distros has a really beginner friendly features to adapt easily. how can you aclaim that linux mint is easy to operate but many other distros don't. linux mint only standardize your DE experience with limiting your customization and it is not only example of it. there are zorinOS, elementaryOS and popOS too that has advanced DE customization to make distro to work more user-friendly.
oh great another half assed AI voiced over channel
At least this one made more sense and gave a fair (but too short in my opinion) description than others out there.
@@haplozetetic9519 Thanks mate for backing up!!
Think about that some might lack a confidence to talk in public, even if that's a video, or do not deem own voice suitable for narration. Who knows...this voice over however wasn't as bad as others and the video has SOME truth in it, even if it isn't correct entirely or didn't fully disclose everything.
@@roberttranceedm 👍
Windows 10 and 11 are both objectively better than any Linux distribution.
Oh and Linux being secure....LOL...that IS a fable. A false one as well. It's an Emmentaler cheese of new and very old vulnerabilities and bugs from kernel to DEs, applications, graphic stacks, windowing protocols, etc...
Respect your opinion mate but, calling Linux a ‘security cheese’ is a bit of a stretch. Linux benefits from being open-source, where vulnerabilities are often patched faster than on proprietary systems like Windows.
In terms of security, Linux excels with its permissions system, being less targeted by malware, and its customizability. As for Windows 10/11 being "objectively" better, it really depends on the use case. For servers, privacy, and open-source flexibility, Linux often comes out ahead.
btw, thanks for the LOL moment - gotta love a good Emmentaler cheese reference though.😅
@@technetiumm " vulnerabilities are often patched faster than... " --- when there is someone for it.
You have no idea about the amount of still unsolved serious vulnerabilites in every layer of Linux (from kernel up to user space, in everything), many of those no one cares about anymore (no person to patch available). I advice not to research it too deep either, it's a scare for life.
Linux can be (and should be) hardened for added security by the user, if someone is technically inclined and has a lot of times, yes, and there are publications for it to help that, but Linux is not automatically more secure. That's a cute myth coming from the lower amount of targeting.
And Windows was famous that they didn't fix security holes because it would break compatibility, so they left security holes wide open and fixed things on service pack (and that break stuff).
In reality there isn't much of difference in vulnerabilities because almost all Linux distributions and Windows are made similar development process.
What makes difference is that Linux based operating systems allows much better to strip off extra functionality and make minimal OS dedicated for task, and removing all unnecessary code where security holes might exist.
That is where Linux based operating systems wins Windows easily. This feature together with that Linux is defacto standard on servers, most of the computer infrastructure runs on Linux. Not Windows 10 or 11.
Linux is faster and you can do pretty much whatever you want on it. Also Microsoft is spying on Windows. If you capture your internet packages you can find some packages going to Microsoft. And you are mostly safe on both if you dont download things that you dont know. On Linux you can use nearly any program that you can use on Windows but if the program's creator decides to remove it you cant use it on Windows (like adobe flash or paint 3d). I like paint 3d its easy to use but Microsoft is going to remove it. Windows' only point is gaming, Linux can be harder to use but there is always a solution to your problem on the internet.