Dr Stuart McGill & Duffin talking shop on 'tuning' process for human performance

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
  • Dr Stuart McGill & Duffin talking shop on "tuning" process for human performance
    www.kabukiwarri...
    kabukistrength.net
    www.elitefts.co...
    / 358131024360101
    / kabuki_strong
    / kabukistrong

Комментарии • 19

  • @jaredlee8371
    @jaredlee8371 9 лет назад +4

    This is why I love this sport. It is like chess. Masters' always trying to get better. Or newbs like me working on better form.

  • @bman2179
    @bman2179 9 лет назад +3

    Another great informative interview Chris. Thanks to both you and Dr. Stu for this video. Keep them coming!

  • @mikkeljrgensen181
    @mikkeljrgensen181 9 лет назад +3

    Two new Duffin videos within an hour? This is fucking awesome! Please start uploading more frequently again as well, I really, really enjoy and learn from your content!

  • @ceili
    @ceili 9 лет назад +1

    Great interview. I think what they discussed is applicable to any field, not just sport.

  • @hvaranhvaran
    @hvaranhvaran 4 года назад

    This is golden. Love these discussions between you two! Thank you for sharing!

  • @warlordzephyr
    @warlordzephyr 9 лет назад +5

    Beard is looking thick, solid, tight. Keep us updated with progress pics.

  • @michaellopez-lq5fn
    @michaellopez-lq5fn 8 лет назад +2

    duffin is the fucking man, biomechanics is so overlooked in the weightlifting realm with programming taking the cake for the main focus on peoples minds. without proper technique WHO CARES about the programming. but also, chris would you mind sharing some knowledge on your programming philosophy? I see a lot of velocity based stuff is that just from the soviets or has there been more recent works on the topic? thanks Chris, you da man

  • @raymondtango
    @raymondtango 9 лет назад +2

    Chris,
    I love your work. Absolute game changer for me.
    Just wanted to say thanks.
    I was wondering if you could do a video on the correct cues for the overhead press? Would love to hear you break it down similar to how you have one for the squat - the way you explain sh*t just works for me.
    Thanks again for all the free information.
    Will be getting a shoulderok sent to scotland when the finances allow.

  • @MarkMacqueen
    @MarkMacqueen 9 лет назад +1

    loved this!!!

  • @HunterClowdusVlogs
    @HunterClowdusVlogs 9 лет назад

    Long game checking in

  • @theniels789
    @theniels789 9 лет назад

    So what is the process to find the "right" stance width?

    • @Gabriel-vi7nl
      @Gabriel-vi7nl 8 лет назад +3

      +theniels789 I believe Stu has some videos of this. Essentially what you do is find out the leg position you get the most hip flexion in without movement of the lumbar spine. This is mainly dependent on hip and femoral morphologies such as acetabular depth for example. This varies between cultures actually. Some get more hip mobility in a narrow stance, which is typical of Polish and Asian decent I believe, and others get more out of a wide stance, such as Celtic hips.
      I found the video. /watch?v=PkQb2LJtLgo He teaches this in his courses at the University of Waterloo. He also has a few books if you're interested in educating yourself.

    • @nickkraw1
      @nickkraw1 8 лет назад

      +Gabriel Zimmerman the video link you posted is addressing squat depth and speaks very little as to squat stance.

    • @Gabriel-vi7nl
      @Gabriel-vi7nl 8 лет назад

      Nick Kraw The technique allows you to know at which point you get the most depth. For people who wish to go as low as then can in the squat, that is the stance width that is optimal for them. If you don't squat at the width which your hips allow more range of motion, you will flex your lumbar spine more. This is very injurious.

    • @nickkraw1
      @nickkraw1 8 лет назад

      Gabriel Zimmerman You can improve over time the depth to which you can descend without your pelvis rotating posteriorly. Its just removing buttwink. That doesn't change which stance I'll be the strongest in. I personally have found that I am stronger in a narrow stance, and thus I have taken to squatting with a narrow stance. But if I have trained squatting with a wider stance instead of narrower, would I be stronger? Who knows, I think not, simply because I feel so much more comfortable with a narrow stance ,but maybe thats a mobility issue, again, who knows. I'd have to visit Chris Duffin and have him coach me to know for sure.

    • @Gabriel-vi7nl
      @Gabriel-vi7nl 8 лет назад +1

      Nick Kraw Different people are able to go deeper at different stance widths. Some people get more range of motion width a narrower stance. Some of the time squat depth can be increased by increasing hip mobility, however, most of the time you can't change it because of your acetabular and femoral morphology. If depth is a problem, it is likely that you aren't able to hit parallel in a squat without a wink, therefore, you should squat with the stance width that allows you to get the most depth without having to wink to get more depth.

  • @lincolncollingridge8822
    @lincolncollingridge8822 5 лет назад

    Elite Performance Centre
    Let’s talk about everything but my juicing regime