“There are basically two types of people. People who accomplish things, and people who claim to have accomplished things. The first group is less crowded.” ~ Mark Twain
Always Outta Control and the Gross Squad do NOTHING In Congress. AOC is still telling the Jan. 6th LIE that she was in danger and she was no where lose to the issue. These frauds bought their way in and want people to believe they got the votes? 😂 They don’t want to work for the country, they blatantly work AGAINST it and just screech out into the void, having accomplished nothing while in office. They ALL need to go!
@@dr.davidenglish778 What did we get in the last two years they didn't change the tax code.so Millionaire's pay their fair share why??? Oh, most of them are millionaires......
“That is not to say that we can relax our readiness to defend ourselves. Our armament must be adequate to the needs, but our faith is not primarily in these machines of defense but in ourselves” - Chester W. Nimitz
It was outlined actually... They are allowed to carry but on the house floor and select chambers if I heard correctly. Why should they give up their rights when they walk in the building?
@@ffemtx47 Too bad there is such a waste of time. I heard at least three times for a list of names of the threatening individuals, but like always, you get the Dim position of inflict pain on all (yet when was there a house rep who pulled a gun on another? In committee no less!
@@lawrencegenereux8567 that would be TFG. From crowd size to golf scores to magazine covers, weather patterns, pandemics, wealth, taxes and anything that tumbled from his mouth. Sad!
Holy shit this is why nothing gets done, how can a committee make decisions if they cant even decide on the rules for even holding said committee? What are we paying these people for?
@@scooter2163 we don’t elect them. We elect people who want to do the job and the ones who actually get it are the ones paying their way in or harvesting ballots and cheating to “win the election”. They’ve done NOTHING while in office and should’ve been fired the day they said they wouldn’t work with a sitting president. In what other job can you go to work and tell the boss or the owner of the country, “You’re disgusting. I don’t like you. I won’t work with you and I will do everything in my power to work against you.”? A normal person would be fired on the spot, yet Always Outta Control in the Gross Squad say it and they get put on the cover of a magazine. It’s insanity and they need to go NOW!
@@commontater8630 Oh! So are you saying bickering on fire arms on the floor is discussing natural resources in which the committee was established to do?
Natural resources might mean that members of congress in future have to hunt for their lunch. Regarding Paul Gosar: he seems to have a severe tick, would he be excluded from carrying fire arms on that ground? Btw: in Zurich (CH) we had our first and last ‚mass‘ shooting around 1983, when the head of the building departement of the city government felt mobbed by his staff. He went and shot 4 of them and wounded a fifth. In 2001 they had another mass shooting when a citizen entered a meeting of the parliament of Kanton Zug. He shot around 20 of them. Since then we have metal detectors on all entrances of government buildings.
@@marlochatman3263 No. I'm saying that any legislative body has certain business to take care of, ancillary to legislative proceedings. Call it housekeeping.
the only ones not trusting other representatives and thinking that CCW permits are given like popcorn in a movie theater are AOC and company........ they are indirectly saying that CCW holders are not educated in the use of firearms.... like if it was so simple to get a CCwW permit! Jesus H. Christ enlighten them!!
It's worth noting that the last time members of Congress openly carried weapons on the floor was immediately before Southern states started seceding from the union.
@@christopherbradley5575 eh Florida can stay. They may be crazy due to the humidity and heat, but they are fighting the good fight for actual common sense. Removing Disney's self governing status was great and desantis is pushing in the right direction. Plus the fishing down there is too good to pass up. Lol
Wow. Somebody voted for every one of these people. They took an oath to serve their state and the country. And this is the caliber of folk we have? Smh. God help us.
"We owe allegiance to more than politicians and principalities. What binds us should always count for more than what drives us apart " ...... Instead of backstabbing
@@blt981 you talking about AOC? Ummm her life Was in danger because the scum who broke into the capital were looking for her. Yet she of all people should want one but didn’t want one. The one complaining about “being scared” hahaha nobody was after her 😂😂 Guns don’t belong in the capital.
Not surprising or shocking considering they are willing to let firearms be kept in classrooms. Gun safety classes use to teach their students to; 1. Always assume a gun is loaded and 2. Keep guns away from children.
@@gdiaz8827 no, we’d like to see less access to weapons of war to irresponsible people , school security that works and “good guys with guns” (law enforcement in Uvalde) who don’t hide in the hallways while children are killed.
So, Boebert admits in the beginning that she had FEAR of what was behind that door on January 6.... I thought it was a simple tour of the Capitol building and a peaceful protest?
@@maureenlaneski2802 Yes, there were peaceful people there who went to protest what they truly believed was a stolen election. I have a friend who went...she even made the news recently, and admitted to the judge that she was there because DJT told them to come. Remember, “Big protest in DC on January 6th.” “Be there, will be wild.” and several others by him and other influential individuals. She also went into the building because they let the people in through some of doors, not all. There were hundreds others who stayed outside and continued a nonviolent protest. Others came as disrupters and with violent intent. Human beings are a complex mixture of motivations, and I feel like many good people got swept up in the contagion of the protest. For the people who did physical harm to Capitol police, made threats to ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ stole government property (the podium, papers etc) they are feeling the legal consequences. We can’t live a peaceful life in society unless we agree to certain ground rules: like which side of the road we drive on, what do traffic signals mean....do not steal....and do not kill.
Y'all make a good point. I was kinda getting sour. One thing, tho, you don't slap a bull's rear and get to act surprised afterwards. At least not if you're a "normal" person.
@@patriot4757 Actually it is - "The possession of firearms and dangerous weapons is prohibited in federal facilities. In a Federal building, firearms or dangerous weapons are prohibited. exception The lawful activity of carrying firearms or dangerous weapons in a Federal facility where a weapon may be used to harm somebody." As a reporter I have never entered a federal building without being screen for a weapon first. There should be no question as to whether or not members of Congress should be able to carry weapons on their person.
@@florencemarlowe JANUARY 20, 2021 Five days before the Capitol insurrection, 83 House Republican lawmakers wrote a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy asking them to uphold lawmakers’ right to carry firearms inside the U.S. Capitol complex. They cited several attacks, including a 1954 shooting by Puerto Rican nationalists who wounded five Congressmen; a 1998 shooting that killed two Capitol Police officers; and a 2017 shooting at a Congressional baseball practice in Northern Virginia, which left four people wounded. One of the signatories on the January 1 letter, freshman Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, made headlines for lashing out at Capitol Police who insisted that lawmakers go through metal detectors that were erected at the entrance to the House and Senate chambers following the insurrection on January 6. At least a dozen other lawmakers also refused, pushing their way past Capitol Police. The episode prompted Pelosi to announce a $5,000 fine for members who refused, and $10,000 for each subsequent offense. A 1967 law bans civilians from carrying guns on Capitol Hill, even if they have concealed carry licenses. But the law carves out an exception for lawmakers, who can keep firearms in their offices. Guns aren’t allowed everywhere: They’re prohibited in the House and Senate chambers and their adjoining lobbies and cloakrooms, the Marble Room of the Senate, and the Rayburn Room of the House.
@@florencemarlowe You realize that members of Congress are exempt from most of the laws the impose on the surfs. You are supposedly a reporter, not a member of Congress.
The point is not what you think. The point is to show how exercising a RIGHT, which cannot be taken away, is done responsibly. In other words, an exercising of rights is to educate those around you.
@@Repdem You cannot have a militia, regulated or otherwise, if the people don't have the right to keep and bear arms. That's why it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" after mentioning a well regulated militia in the second amendment.
@@I3igI3adW0lf Nope. The states were worried about the federal government disbanding their militias which were formed to keep slaves from uprising. Therefore, the federal government is not supposed to interfere with 'their people' keeping and bearing arms and the reasoning (excuse) was that it would enable the states to have a well-regulated milita.
@kathyratino962 I'd say all. I'd constantly be quoting founding father gun quotes and that to infringe upon their rights to keep and bear arms is a crime against the U.S. Constitution. To swear oath to uphold and to defend the U.S. Constitution and then be a criminal against it is perjury and unconstitutionally criminal. I'd read the definition of infringe before everyone to make sure everyone knows that it means to limit. These are all pussy weaklings. To limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms is a crime in the U.S.A. private places is another thing altogether. For property owners have the right to limit people from bringing arms on their own property. Tax funded buildings, properties, and streets by law they can't limit. They can't limit based on age, sex, race, etc. either by law. That's how you get shit done. Straight forward. The only thing I agree with is discipline training in arms as being a free requirement because the founding fathers said so.
If there is in any question in that very room about safety then what are we going to expect from any form of trust to have them govern in a civil manner?
These people are nuts! Why would u bring a gun to work! Especially if u already have your own police force. Imagine one of these people getting upset and losing an argument. Or doesnt like what the other person says and then starts popping off. You have to admit that some of these representatives shouldn't even have a gun.
Most people think others will act in the same way that they do. Therefore, you're assuming that, since you would get upset and shoot someone else in an argument, that everyone else would. I would suggest you don't get a firearm.
Are you aware that most democratic countries change their constitutions from time to time.Constitutions are not written in stone.A referendum is held and the citizens vote on the amendment.This is basic democracy.
@@alienlife7754 She was literally being hunted on 1-6 ...were those your people? She's smarter than most of the room and they're afraid of her so they mock her.
So if I'm hearing this right, the members of the house are not permitted to bring guns in the committee chambers yet some do anyway? Would this not be the same as an American citizen bringing a gun into a gun free zone? If so then shouldn't the members of congress that are violating the rules be prosecuted the same as a citizen that violates a gun free zone restriction?
you are hearing correctly and you are completely correct. gun free zones such as federal buildings and other places it is illegal to have a gun anyway so they should have been arrested the same way a person would be arrested if they brought a weapon into a court room school or any other gun restricted building.
@@mikehunt3222 It demonstrates neither awareness of or respect for the world as it exists, which includes wolves, who inhabited the territory now known as Colorado long before any of Boebert's kind did. Nor awareness of or respect for the role that wolves play in an ecosystem.
Huge props to AOC. Sitting across from the twitching fool who posted memes of him killing her and then the jack-fool who kept asking her and the others to identify who they should fear. As if there is NO reason to mistrust them.
Background check is a requirement before you can buy a gun. Are you going pick and choose who is able to carry a gun? You will slap with discrimination.
How sad that there are people like you who think it's sad. 120 years ago when people respected the constitution, it would not even have to be discussed. If you don't like the constitution, change it. Oh yea that right, you've already neutered it. First the second amendment, now the first!
@johnhill7585 you mean the constitution that says that the people of a state as a whole have the right to have a well trained and organized state militia to protect the state and its people? Don't worry. Nobody is trying to get rid of that right as specified in the second amendment. As for the past let's go back 150 years to the old west where most towns had laws requiring that anybody who came into town in possession of a gun had to immediately hand over the gun to an authority figure such as the sheriff or to the owner of the town hotel.
He was too scared to answer, total 😺, if I were AOC I’d go in there strapped too. What is the reason for anyone in congress to be walking around with a gun? The question should be asked, who does he/ she feel that is a threat to them that they feel they need to walk around with a gun
AOC and Barack Hussein Obama , Planned All The 911 Attacks and All The Radial Muslins Attacks and Yes We Only Have Our Freedom Be😢 Of Our 2nd Amendment 😊
What puts a smirk on my face is republicans swearing the dems are the ones changing narratives or lying about events. Also how are those questions asinine when Boebart is indeed suggesting carrying weapons anywhere in government buildings.
@Daniel Essex it's asinine how much noise democrats make about guns except in, Chicago, Maryland, Philadelphia, Saint Louis, etc etc. It's asinine how they make so much noise about taking rights from responsible gun owners and no bail for irresponsible gun users. But you are probably incapable of seeing the difference.
Using a gun to harm others is not a "form of character" , but rather a thing of "opportunity" if you have a gun while you are really pissed off, you are more likely to shoot someone than if you didn't have a gun at that moment.
Most sane people that own guns don't even think about that, what you described is the criminal mind, House members are not criminals at least not in that capacity, they have too much to lose, this is all about a matter of protection as we saw what happened on Jan. 6th and the shooting at Republicans baseball practice that nearly killed Steve Schalise. The homicidal threats most assuredly always come from pyschos outside Congress.
@@tonyrame7548 Most mass shootings come from WHIITE MEN, who somehow always seem to surprise those around them. Whatever excuse you want to find, if you look up statistics, you will see, it is a matter of a moment of anger, and to think "it wont happen to this one" has been been disproven by so many shootings of inocent people by cops, and other people because " we feared for our lives"; what do you think it will take to Triger people who are afraid of their own shadows. Most politicians are are not "brave" people. One thing is to own a gun, another is to think you can only be safe by bringing it to work. That behavior in and of itself starts a domino effect. I was in the military and never had teh need to walk around with a gun, even in other countries, except when it was my turn at guard. Congress men are not well balanced individuals, they are usually narcissist's to some degree at best. Many suffer from paranoia at different degrees, and either compulsory liars, or delusional to some degree. Those people youa re going to argue are "well balanced "? lol naw man I dont think even you believe that one.
Maybe because some of those congress members have been physically threatened? Some of them have been targeted by shooting them in a political ads. You don't think those congress members should be more wary of their safety?
GFZ, as all sane people know, allows stiffer penalties to be charged against anyone committing a crime with a gun there. THAT is why they were created, because it is so extremely heinous to bring a gun around children that they deserve harsher punishment.
To purchase arms is their 2A right under the constitution but to carry them into the house or senate must be debated and voted on ! This is why a constitutional Republic is so transparent and fair ! But there is one thing I can assure that if all members decide to be armed you can bet your bottom dollar that there will never be any attempt at a real insurrection ever !
@@donnaturner4795 you're right,,, It's written in the bible... in the letter to the American... the last book of the new testament just after the Apocalypse...
Actually she's correct. Between the doors being opened by capital police. To Pelosi refusing to bring in extra security. To Ray Epps being on video telling people they needed to go into the Capital.. Anyone can tell you they're whatever, until you look into their history.
@capnordest actually, what I wrote was accurate. Ray Epps is on camera, but has been hidden. I'm not a Republican, but if you are naive to the point you think Republicans are solely responsible for ALL January 6 events. You and others would be kidding yourselves on what really was going on. These are actual facts, and not some theory or magical wonderland I'm dreaming up. If, you and others would do some investigating yourselves. How about you actually look into it. Instead of taking whatever you've been told as bold face facts.
Yeah you would think so but then again since as they were the ones to orchestrate the whole thing trying to create a way to offset all the bad publicity that they're little animals they at least on the cities to burn them and riot and loot had caused them means that they know they aren't actually in danger. It's just like them knowing the whole time that there was medication that if taken when you caught COVID it would allow you to survive but they suppressed it so they could push a vaccine that never worked. Typical Democrat bullshit. But it was entertaining to watch
For all these politicians that are against the 2nd amendment, go pitch a tent at the boarder for a weekend with no armed guards, tell us how safe you are.
@@johnhill7585 No it's not. Can you imagine going to a meeting at your job to discuss the rules of a committee to run a project and you are arguing about whether members should be allowed to bring GUNS into the meetings! I swear congress is the single most toxic workplace I have ever seen. I don't know how they actually run the country.
You know what's insane, asking a person in congress what the definition of a woman is and them not being able the answer it based on some bs new radical agenda.
@@DarleneT Some laws are effective, while others are feel good legislation. This rule would have zero real world effect, other than depriving individuals of their right to self protection. Some laws hold people accountable for crimes after the fact, which is effectively what this rule would do. It wouldn’t prevent anything. If your concern is members of congress to killing each other, maybe we should make murder illegal. Or we can argue about whether or not they were j-walking on their way to the crime scene.
Why, because you're projecting your mental instabilities on other people? Normal armed people interact with other people everyday and don't randomly start shooting.
Fear is such a great way to manipulate people into victim mentality and keep them there. AOC and others need to stop their whining and get some work done
@@JustMe-zk2wh I'm sorry dude but 1) I don't want to know that I'm going in to a workplace that should be secure that I have to worry about a constituent who has a gun, is a little unstable, might have a bad day. 2) That everyone has interpreted the rules as acceptable to carry so there might be a crazy day when everyone's having a bad day and I'm stuck in the middle of it.
@binh Huynh so to have a ccl you can't have certain charges on your police record, especially violent ones. Yet here we are with sitting members that have these kinds of charges and are probably more unpredictable than someone with a ccl. Ps in reference to the security of the building, you drive a point with the key words SHOULD BE.
People are not concerned about the concealed guns that remain concealed. It's the ones that come out of concealment for the wrong reasons that are concerning. If nobody ever got shot by the crazy ones, this would not be an issue.
@@scytaleghola5969 And yet the places in this country with the most random firearm violence are the places with the most restrictive laws on the books.
@@elderblackdragon Not quite the right way to say it. The places with the highest rates of gun violence are places where often more restrictive gun laws are deployed as a reaction to that violence. Unless your hypothesis is that restrictive gun laws drive people to commit more gun crimes...
@@lindarock4128 You do not need to convince me of the ineffectiveness of gun regulations in America. I know first hand. I am not promoting a gun regulation agenda. My only point was that most anti-gun people are not concerned about responsible gun owners (such that they exist). They are concerned about the irresponsible ones. In the same way that fear drives many people to own guns, fear also drives other people to try and restrict those guns. A large majority of Americans live their lives in fear of one thing or another and most do not react rationally to that fear.
@@bobfoster687 Thanks I hadn't even heard of that one before. It's just more proof that even with officers that believe in trying to come to the ages civilians they can't and unfortunately our legal system is working against the victims and for the criminals Thanks for sharing that information.
I'm so happy Bobert acknowledges that the capitol police were over whelmed and should be credited for their courageous deeds. I bet she voted to reward them with medals of honour!
@@corryburton9834 _"I wonder who was in charge of the amount of capital police when they were DENIED BACKUP"_ 🤦 And _who_ denied the backup? Your _lieber Führer_ \o ("dear Leader") and his lacky's in the Pentagon.
"Well Regulated" Literally means Well equiped & trained....in order to protect the security of a free State.... Then it goes on to to say that the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep & bear( own and use) Arms SHALL NOT be infringed.... What sense would it make for a Free States security being dependent on firearms, need those firearms to be restricted to Time, place and Manor restrictions of the Government they would be defending their Free State against? Like we're sorry we "Well Regulated" your "Free States" security to Cap and Ball revolvers and Black power Muskets but only after a Fortnight on the third Wednesday of February of each leap year .... Outside of that timeline you MUST be submissive to oppression or WE the Government will use F15 against YOU the people (That's a quote from POTUS by the way)
@@alanajacobs9882 @Alana Jacobs oh Honey..... History and context are certainly lost on you. You are correct....the definition today does means that. However at the time the Constitution was written it was LITERALLY a document to protect the people FROM the government as they had just fought a war to stop the oppression of tyranny. In that period "well-regulated”-meaning trained and equiped to standards set by the federal government" Read the founders Federalist and even Anti-Federalist papers... It isn't even up for debate. You can claim that well Regulated means with all the government restrictions possible and under their rule just like you can claim the 2A only applies to Muskets. But if that's the case your free speech is only covered by a twill pen and parchment sheet. The Bill of Rights isn't a privilege like driving a car. It's a RIGHT granted to you by the creator (whomever you believe that to be.... Ancient Gods or descendants of Monkeys 🤷🏼♂️ it's still protected by the same document). Please come correct to debate next time. Whatever "The dictionary NOW says it's so, so it must be" is trash.
@@shane35fowler fine if you wanna use that definition…so you’re gonna just skip over the word “militia” in your defense? For someone who is stuck on what the definition was back then you seem to gloss over a thing called context. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. The founders wrote the 2nd amendment after defeating a totalitarian monarch, hence why they said “is necessary for the security of a free state.” It’s used in the context of protection against a totalitarian government. Secondly, even in the Heller case the Supreme Court said while their interpretation of the 2nd amendment gives individuals the right to possess firearms, it doesn’t permit for any kind of firearm you want, stating individuals have the right to arms for only traditionally lawful purposes- if someone has 30 firearms or a sawed off shotgun or bump stock or unregistered/ghost gun they’re not planning on using them for anything lawful. Same reason why the government has laws restricting how much Sudafed you can buy. Texas literally has a law restricting the amount of dildos you can own, but you can own as many guns as you want and if you’re over 21 you don’t need a permit or training. Also in many states a person has to be CONVICTED of domestic violence for them to be banned from owning a gun, which is why tens of thousands of women who have their partners arrested for domestic violence still end up dead, because a court conviction takes a long time after an initial arrest. Finally, constitutional rights are not absolute. There are limits to free speech, hence why we have defamation laws, or maybe see what happens if you incite violence or chaos (like yelling bomb on an airplane). Another example is that People also can’t use their freedom of religion to discriminate against people they don’t like.
@@shane35fowler you don’t need to be a PhD to understand the correlation between access to guns and the number of guns deaths. We don’t have more criminals or mentally ill people or violent video games than any other country.
You are responsible for your own safety per the Supreme Court of the United States. As was stated by some in the room, carry or don't it's up to you. 2A gives you that right and authority
You're right about the supreme Court I read one of their rulings in magazine I used to get called America's first freedom. And they also made that ruling when three women in Washington DC were trying to sue the DC Police department for not saving them after they called 911. Two thugs kicked in their door to their townhouse and the two upstairs roommates could hear them proceed to beat and rape their downstairs roommate They called 911 and we're told to stay hidden help was on the way. And while watching out the upstairs window they saw one DC police car pull up in front of the house with two officers in it cuz they could see the passenger officer They didn't have any lights on they didn't use their spotlight and they didn't even get out of the car they could see the passenger officer look at the house turn and say something to the driver and then they saw the car drive away. They tried calling 911 again and couldn't even get a response. After the noise is downstairs head stopped for a while The two upstairs women snuck down to check on their roommate and called out and found out that the two men were still there and those two men found out that they had fresh meat. The men sexually tortured and raped those women for 13 hours and then just walked out the front door and weren't caught. In my opinion they deserved to win but that's my emotional response. Supreme Court ended that on what you just said but they also stated in the ruling that the reason they lost the case is because the police meaning city state highway patrol have no legal obligation to come to the aid or rescue of the individual citizen They are not here for the protection of the individual citizen, it is the duty responsibility and obligation of the individual citizen to protect their lives their family their property by whatever means necessary up to and including deadly force with firearms. The legal responsibility of police is for the use and protection of the government and to catch a criminal after they committed a crime until they actually commit the crime there's nothing they can do, which means that you can feel really good that yes you may be robbed raped or killed but the cops are supposed to be responsible about catching the guy after you've been victimized.
2A prevents the government from restricting your right and authority to carry. It does not grant you the right to carry. That right exists prior to and independent of any government.
She didn’t “grill’ chit. She was just giving herself a headache with her stupid questions lol. They guy was laughing at her knowing she was clueless lol😂
@@semitope no they were not straight forward. It’s very stupid for a 3rd term Congress birther person to not know there is house rule admin to advise her on house rules. start there.
This is a perfect example of why nothing important gets done they are to busy quibbling over who did or said what. Not a single concern over those they are supposed to represent or what they are there to actually do. .
Why do you have to have a need to exercise a constitutional right? Every citizen of the US has the right to carry a firearm as per the wording of the second amendment.
@@I3igI3adW0lf Mmmmm if that's indeed the case, than why was Reagan and conservatives in California were able to pass gun control after the Panther "exercise" their Gun Rights?
We don't have gun permits around here, some of my neighbors leave their garage doors open overnight and no one dares to go inside or steal their kids bikes in the front yard. Also, people are for the most part very polite.
Yep i grew up when we never needed to lock our doors. We also knew all of our neighbors. That is something i still work at. Knowing our neighbors is very important.
I'm an army veteran of 7 years, NISHAN participant, had all the training in the world, and have had and fired more different guns than the average gun owner. To this day, due to the many gun incidents I've witnessed, I don't trust anyone handling guns. Accidents do happen, stupidity happens, and bad behavior happens. I wouldn't trust anyone that says that there is nothing to fear.
If you knew anything about firearm handling or firearms specifically made for concealed carry the difficulty for accidental discharge of these are extremely tough. People misrepresent accidental discharge with people claiming they didn’t know it was loaded.
That is the excuse of a Democrat and it could not be farther from the truth wants to ban guns. Before you can buy a gun one requirement is to attend gun safety class.
@@kimocoloma4123 Baldwin, is democrat. I resent both the left and right including the media and any judge saying it was a prop gun. A prop, can't fire a round and the barrel is weld plugged, no firing pin and a prop although real but unable to function can be owned by anyone, especially retard actors who don't know how to use basic firearm safety and say the other person sad it wasn't loaded. Its as lame as saying the person you ran her wasn't your fault because you were drunk, that doesn't fly with a judge and involuntary manslaughter is a appropriate charge for Baldwin.
If our national legislative body cannot agree that responsibility for the security of that body is properly vested in its security force (i.e. the Capitol Police), because some individual members believe that their 'personal' security - or their gun-toting ideology - overrides all other considerations, then we as a nation are in deep trouble.
They make donations off the sound bytes. Boebert will be sending out these clips with several donate to me emails.It’s gross. Gosar too. While they threaten other members outside the chamber.AOC made a very good point. Sounds like they are trying to be vague and push it through. Very shady.
And if it didn't we would still wind up in a better place because then we could get a whole brand new panel of people up there only this time we put in people that can balance a budget keep the book straight run a business 🤣
When I carry concealed nobody knows, and as long as the firearm is properly holstered there would never ever be an issue of negligence. Accidents don't happen; negligence does but negligence can be defeated completely! 2A is all AMERICAN!
@Sharon Zuck-Dignard people that have it in themselves to break the law will do just that. Guns are prohibited on school grounds, but did that stop the criminal from doing that?
It's hard to keep a straight face when she trying to regain attention. Reminds me of that meme where she is saying I just bought this radio, and it says built-in antenna, she replies I don't even know where Antenna is?
"I would just say in addition that this notion that we are all responsible vetted individuals there's nothing to worry about is pretty cold comfort when we have members of this institution who it turns out weren't so well vetted" Boom... Shakalaka!
He's worried about a congress critter stealing a firearm from a purse or jacket. Isn't that rich. Well maybe he has a point there's a lot of congress critters trying to steal the guns of law abiding citizens. What would stop them from stealing from each other?
@@johnhill7585 This is the best you can do? Yell “FAKE” and then claim something that 1) doesn’t make any logical sense and 2) has no proof? MTG literally posted a video inviting insurrectionists to the Capitol on her own social media. Try and keep up.
Why would a congressional representative need to carry a weapon unless they fear for their personal safety. You can lock it up in your office but should have no need to have it in the house.
Tell that to the Republican that was shot at the capital baseball practice. Or Rand Paul that was chased while being out with his wife. The only person responsible for your safety, is you. Police are paid to serve and protect, but not everyone has that ability. Not, are you going to have access to them 24/7.
@@chriswilliamson806 I am talking about on the house floor . If you need to carry to conduct your business in running the office of congress then you fail in a leadership position.
@D S obviously, I understand why people should be able to carry regardless of where they are. IF, you're trained and licensed to carry. Why would you take that ability from them? So, we literally have Veterans, some of which were special forces. You wouldn't feel comfortable with them carrying on the floor of they choose?
I find the chairman's fear of actually expressing his view on the rules to be incredibly craven. He's allegedly in charge and should be able to direct his committee as to the rules. If he doesn't know them he should.
He just thinks you couldn't understand the rules so he's not going to waste his time trying to explain to someone that doesn't understand anything about rules . When you took campaign donations and put them in your private account. That was against the rules. So you don't understand rules.
“There are basically two types of people. People who accomplish things, and people who claim to have accomplished things. The first group is less crowded.” ~ Mark Twain
Always Outta Control and the Gross Squad do NOTHING In Congress. AOC is still telling the Jan. 6th LIE that she was in danger and she was no where lose to the issue. These frauds bought their way in and want people to believe they got the votes? 😂 They don’t want to work for the country, they blatantly work AGAINST it and just screech out into the void, having accomplished nothing while in office. They ALL need to go!
That is an exact description of what will happen in the House the next two years.
George Santos is head of the second group.
@@walterorlowski4808 George Santos is in a class by himself. Unfortunately it also puts him at the top of his very small classless class.
@@dr.davidenglish778 What did we get in the last two years they didn't change the tax code.so Millionaire's pay their fair share why??? Oh, most of them are millionaires......
"Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face." - Mike Tyson
“That is not to say that we can relax our readiness to defend ourselves. Our armament must be adequate to the needs, but our faith is not primarily in these machines of defense but in ourselves” - Chester W. Nimitz
Mike Tyson , That’s Because They Are Girly Men 😊
She must be lusiqis Mike Tyson
why punch when you can shoot?
@@ZeroChaos80 sure... COWARDS always choose to shoot.
“Follow the rules.” Ok, what are the rules? “Follow the rules.”
Exactly! It doesn't seem like the correct people were invited to this meeting
It was outlined actually... They are allowed to carry but on the house floor and select chambers if I heard correctly. Why should they give up their rights when they walk in the building?
These politicians should/need to have a role call vote on everything. Get them on the record.
Too bad the vid had gotten cut short. Someone DID call for the roll at the end.
I watched this video nothing on Natural resources only about guns dah!!!!
@@tomhollis7988 That's what happens when AOC gets a bee in her little bonnet
@@ffemtx47 Too bad there is such a waste of time. I heard at least three times for a list of names of the threatening individuals, but like always, you get the Dim position of inflict pain on all (yet when was there a house rep who pulled a gun on another? In committee no less!
@@yrreteugarps2835 Exactly!
Highly vetted? I present to you George Santos 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Says the Biden voter.
One better: Joe "the big guy" Biden.
Santos needs to be investigated and replaced with an American citizen 😤 😒 in the house.
I present to you “Quid Pro Quo Joe” Biden. He’s told more lies than Santos could ever dream of.
@@lawrencegenereux8567 that would be TFG. From crowd size to golf scores to magazine covers, weather patterns, pandemics, wealth, taxes and anything that tumbled from his mouth. Sad!
Holy shit this is why nothing gets done, how can a committee make decisions if they cant even decide on the rules for even holding said committee? What are we paying these people for?
I think the better question is why are we electing some of these people.
@@scooter2163 we don’t elect them. We elect people who want to do the job and the ones who actually get it are the ones paying their way in or harvesting ballots and cheating to “win the election”. They’ve done NOTHING while in office and should’ve been fired the day they said they wouldn’t work with a sitting president. In what other job can you go to work and tell the boss or the owner of the country, “You’re disgusting. I don’t like you. I won’t work with you and I will do everything in my power to work against you.”? A normal person would be fired on the spot, yet Always Outta Control in the Gross Squad say it and they get put on the cover of a magazine. It’s insanity and they need to go NOW!
@scooter we're not. They only win their seat by cheating: gerrymandering and voter suppression
My thoughts exactly....no wonder nothing ever gets done for We The People.
D.C. FUBAR 💩
Didn't know this was the firearms carry committee. I thought it was the natural resources committee.
I know. How in the hell does carrying fire arms into the floor have to do with natural resources?
It's called business, folks. Taking care of business. Similar to knowing where the fire exits are located.
@@commontater8630 Oh! So are you saying bickering on fire arms on the floor is discussing natural resources in which the committee was established to do?
Natural resources might mean that members of congress in future have to hunt for their lunch. Regarding Paul Gosar: he seems to have a severe tick, would he be excluded from carrying fire arms on that ground?
Btw: in Zurich (CH) we had our first and last ‚mass‘ shooting around 1983, when the head of the building departement of the city government felt mobbed by his staff. He went and shot 4 of them and wounded a fifth.
In 2001 they had another mass shooting when a citizen entered a meeting of the parliament of Kanton Zug. He shot around 20 of them. Since then we have metal detectors on all entrances of government buildings.
@@marlochatman3263 No. I'm saying that any legislative body has certain business to take care of, ancillary to legislative proceedings. Call it housekeeping.
I love how he dodged every question. A true politician!
Yeah he should say it's OK . It's crazy to dodge that question
It’s sad to live in America today 😢
Yes......when did we get so dumb?
@@davidking4838 the most recent bout started in the Reagan years. Corporate greed.
If our representatives don’t trust each other, how can we trust them.
Gosar threatened to kill another member of congress. How can you trust Gosar when his own siblings thinks he's dangerous?
There's a number of representatives in both the house and the senate that I wouldn't trust.
Paul Gosar put out a campaign ad, which actually depicts him murdering AOC. Would you trust him, after seeing something like that?
the only ones not trusting other representatives and thinking that CCW permits are given like popcorn in a movie theater are AOC and company........ they are indirectly saying that CCW holders are not educated in the use of firearms.... like if it was so simple to get a CCwW permit! Jesus H. Christ enlighten them!!
Can't trust them at all, anytime for anything.
It's worth noting that the last time members of Congress openly carried weapons on the floor was immediately before Southern states started seceding from the union.
Very interesting ...
Exactly.. so you already know what is coming soon.
Look on the bright side. Maybe we can get rid of California, Florida and Illinois.
@@christopherbradley5575 maybe 'we' can get rid of three of our most populous states. That seems rather silly.
@@christopherbradley5575 eh Florida can stay. They may be crazy due to the humidity and heat, but they are fighting the good fight for actual common sense. Removing Disney's self governing status was great and desantis is pushing in the right direction. Plus the fishing down there is too good to pass up. Lol
Wow. Somebody voted for every one of these people. They took an oath to serve their state and the country. And this is the caliber of folk we have? Smh. God help us.
They want to bring a gun to a debate because in a battle of wits they come unarmed.
I completely agree with you
"We owe allegiance to more than politicians and principalities. What binds us should always count for more than what drives us apart " ...... Instead of backstabbing
@@sprig5173 or because only a few years ago, a berniebro shot a congressman.
Guns for everyone hell fuc ing yeah
Every individual Committee member to interpret the rules individually as they see fit? This is anarchy disguised as civility.
These two aren't scared for their safety. They just want to decide who can have guns, and who can't. It's about their power, nothing more.
I agree she wants to have power to say no guns till she gets threatened or scared…
They ought to be❤
@@Geezerelli I care not to for they have non for others than themselves
@@blt981 you talking about AOC? Ummm her life Was in danger because the scum who broke into the capital were looking for her. Yet she of all people should want one but didn’t want one. The one complaining about “being scared” hahaha nobody was after her 😂😂
Guns don’t belong in the capital.
I'll take a screwdriver double shot of vodka please, here's your tip AOC plant corn early 😂 ydfb
I can't believe we're having to have a discussion about bringing firearms into a committee hearing.
Not surprising or shocking considering they are willing to let firearms be kept in classrooms. Gun safety classes use to teach their students to; 1. Always assume a gun is loaded and 2. Keep guns away from children.
@@brendaberry6648 Democrats would rather kids be easy targets in gun free zones
@@gdiaz8827 no, we’d like to see less access to weapons of war to irresponsible people , school security that works and “good guys with guns” (law enforcement in Uvalde) who don’t hide in the hallways while children are killed.
Should be a no brainer..... of course you can 2A. Shall not be infringed
@@brendaberry6648soft
So, Boebert admits in the beginning that she had FEAR of what was behind that door
on January 6.... I thought it was a simple tour of the Capitol building and a peaceful protest?
They all have two faces.
Maybe ut was both? Why not? /s
@@maureenlaneski2802 Yes, there were peaceful people there who went to protest what they truly believed was a stolen election. I have a friend who went...she even made the news recently, and admitted to the judge that she was there because DJT told them to come. Remember, “Big protest in DC on January 6th.” “Be there, will be wild.” and several others by him and other influential individuals. She also went into the building because they let the people in through some of doors, not all.
There were hundreds others who stayed outside and continued a nonviolent protest. Others came as disrupters and with violent intent.
Human beings are a complex mixture of motivations, and I feel like many good people got swept up in the contagion of the protest. For the people who did physical harm to Capitol police, made threats to ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ stole government property (the podium, papers etc) they are feeling the legal consequences.
We can’t live a peaceful life in society unless we agree to certain ground rules: like which side of the road we drive on, what do traffic signals mean....do not steal....and do not kill.
Y'all make a good point. I was kinda getting sour. One thing, tho, you don't slap a bull's rear and get to act surprised afterwards. At least not if you're a "normal" person.
Yah, why wouldn't she be afraid of FBI informants and agents dressed up as protestors trying to rile up a group of angry people?
As posted at the entrance of all federal buildings, firearms are not permitted except for federal law enforcement officers.
That is not true
@@patriot4757 Actually it is - "The possession of firearms and dangerous weapons is prohibited in federal facilities. In a Federal building, firearms or dangerous weapons are prohibited. exception The lawful activity of carrying firearms or dangerous weapons in a Federal facility where a weapon may be used to harm somebody." As a reporter I have never entered a federal building without being screen for a weapon first. There should be no question as to whether or not members of Congress should be able to carry weapons on their person.
Do you prefer your boot baked or fried
@@florencemarlowe JANUARY 20, 2021
Five days before the Capitol insurrection, 83 House Republican lawmakers wrote a letter to Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy asking them to uphold lawmakers’ right to carry firearms inside the U.S. Capitol complex. They cited several attacks, including a 1954 shooting by Puerto Rican nationalists who wounded five Congressmen; a 1998 shooting that killed two Capitol Police officers; and a 2017 shooting at a Congressional baseball practice in Northern Virginia, which left four people wounded.
One of the signatories on the January 1 letter, freshman Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, made headlines for lashing out at Capitol Police who insisted that lawmakers go through metal detectors that were erected at the entrance to the House and Senate chambers following the insurrection on January 6. At least a dozen other lawmakers also refused, pushing their way past Capitol Police. The episode prompted Pelosi to announce a $5,000 fine for members who refused, and $10,000 for each subsequent offense.
A 1967 law bans civilians from carrying guns on Capitol Hill, even if they have concealed carry licenses. But the law carves out an exception for lawmakers, who can keep firearms in their offices. Guns aren’t allowed everywhere: They’re prohibited in the House and Senate chambers and their adjoining lobbies and cloakrooms, the Marble Room of the Senate, and the Rayburn Room of the House.
@@florencemarlowe You realize that members of Congress are exempt from most of the laws the impose on the surfs. You are supposedly a reporter, not a member of Congress.
The question should be, "If you feel that no one here is a threat, why is there need to bring a gun into the room"?
The point is not what you think. The point is to show how exercising a RIGHT, which cannot be taken away, is done responsibly. In other words, an exercising of rights is to educate those around you.
@@WillHal1000
Well regulated militias don't behave that way.
@@Repdem Then u have no idea what the founders meant when they said "well regulated"
@@Repdem You cannot have a militia, regulated or otherwise, if the people don't have the right to keep and bear arms. That's why it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" after mentioning a well regulated militia in the second amendment.
@@I3igI3adW0lf Nope. The states were worried about the federal government disbanding their militias which were formed to keep slaves from uprising. Therefore, the federal government is not supposed to interfere with 'their people' keeping and bearing arms and the reasoning (excuse) was that it would enable the states to have a well-regulated milita.
You don’t need to be a homicidal maniac to kill someone. All you need is one bad day and a lifetime of regret.
Everyone is capable of murder. The right person at the wrong time and everyone is capable.
Well stated. And, true.
Well put!
Yea that's why there are all these killings in carry states. Oh yes oh yes there are, no there aren't!
Or as the Jesse Fuller song put it, 'I got 99 years and one dark day'.
Congratulations! What a brilliant display. In any private company, in ANY company, these clowns would be all fired on the spot.
Not all…
You know it!
@kathyratino962 I'd say all. I'd constantly be quoting founding father gun quotes and that to infringe upon their rights to keep and bear arms is a crime against the U.S. Constitution. To swear oath to uphold and to defend the U.S. Constitution and then be a criminal against it is perjury and unconstitutionally criminal. I'd read the definition of infringe before everyone to make sure everyone knows that it means to limit. These are all pussy weaklings. To limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms is a crime in the U.S.A. private places is another thing altogether. For property owners have the right to limit people from bringing arms on their own property. Tax funded buildings, properties, and streets by law they can't limit. They can't limit based on age, sex, race, etc. either by law. That's how you get shit done. Straight forward. The only thing I agree with is discipline training in arms as being a free requirement because the founding fathers said so.
And that would be a good start, Pedro. : O )
She knew FULL well what was on the other side of that door.
Right, it was her friends.
@Mitchell Avila grow up. His testimony is widely available.
@Mitchell Avila read his widely available testimony.
As a Dane watching this is insane .. OMG god help America ..
Thank you. We need it.
Thank you, as an American I could not agree with you more!
It ain't that serious. Just political jousting.
As an American, I’m just appalled as you are.
Get her to explain why she feels the need to take a firearm into a committee room.
Your safety is ALWAYS in your own hands.
(Unexpected catastrophic stroke has entered the chat)
Not if you listen to the democrats
@@isaned The same people who will put on their brownshirts and attack you when you are unarmed with their guns.
@@philcarty keep God in church and your guns at home
@@onebadmutha5578 God is everywhere. Right to defend is in any place.
"Highly-vetted individuals?" Really? Tell me how "highly-vetted" George Santos was.
If there is in any question in that very room about safety then what are we going to expect from any form of trust to have them govern in a civil manner?
Maybe they need a guard in the room?
Another person with a weapon, really I don't think so 🤔 😕!!
“Thorough vetting is cold comfort “….. excellent.
These people are nuts! Why would u bring a gun to work! Especially if u already have your own police force. Imagine one of these people getting upset and losing an argument. Or doesnt like what the other person says and then starts popping off. You have to admit that some of these representatives shouldn't even have a gun.
When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away.
Most people think others will act in the same way that they do. Therefore, you're assuming that, since you would get upset and shoot someone else in an argument, that everyone else would. I would suggest you don't get a firearm.
Who shouldn't have a gun and what grounds do you base that belief on?
Most of these representatives shouldn’t be representatives.
The 2A is a right of free people.
Fact
An inalienable right.
Inalienable
Unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor.
And we will defend that right to death.
Amen
Are you aware that most democratic countries change their constitutions from time to time.Constitutions are not written in stone.A referendum is held and the citizens vote on the amendment.This is basic democracy.
The Chairman is deflecting and dodging responsibility.
He should have just said that he'll get more info and bring it to the next meeting. Then, switch back to the natural resource issues.
Yep, common tactic on that side of the street. For him, in that position, that's fucked up.
That chairman sounded like a real jerk.
he's a coward
AOC is right, she had a reason to be concerned. 🙏🏾👏🏾
They should be able to protect themselves
A democratic congressman once beat a republican congressman with a walking cane on the floor of congress once.
Mainly from each other
From who? do Republicans have many enemies?
@@FactsMattersUSA 😆😆😆😆
Absolutely
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed...
Walk into the White House with your AR-15 and see how your rights aren't being infringed.
🧸💪
not in the capitol baby
You left out this part: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State . . ."
how about when some of them supported the insurrection and might feel obliged to do it again?
_Never_ underestimate or ignore the legal arguments of AOC.
Lol. For real? She’s a paid actress dude. A professional victim.
@@alienlife7754 You DO know that Paul Gosar -- who was sitting in that very room -- posted a video that showed him killing her?
@@alienlife7754 She was literally being hunted on 1-6 ...were those your people? She's smarter than most of the room and they're afraid of her so they mock her.
@@michaelelder3131 She was being hunted while not even being in the capitol building?
@@michaelelder3131 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 What a dweeb
So if I'm hearing this right, the members of the house are not permitted to bring guns in the committee chambers yet some do anyway? Would this not be the same as an American citizen bringing a gun into a gun free zone? If so then shouldn't the members of congress that are violating the rules be prosecuted the same as a citizen that violates a gun free zone restriction?
No, they shouldn't. Any law that violates the US Constitution is null and void. Government has no business in dictating what I use to defend myself.
@@thegoldenarm6422 you completely missed the argument. smh i pray your weapon is smarter than you
you are hearing correctly and you are completely correct. gun free zones such as federal buildings and other places it is illegal to have a gun anyway so they should have been arrested the same way a person would be arrested if they brought a weapon into a court room school or any other gun restricted building.
@@DevaJones03 let's play a game, shall we? What's more likely to get shot up? A gun free building or Smokey's Tavern in Tuscaloosa, Alabama?
@@DevaJones03
What part of the argument did I miss? Elaborate.
AOC shouldn't be allowed to handle a weapon for her own safety!
I would be more worried about the people around her if she did. I could care less, what she would do, to her self.
@@TightwadTodd She scares the Shit AOC
@@TightwadTodd according to AOC you are racist. lol.
She has enough trouble with a gas stove.
AOC is too crazy to be allowed to carry
"...keeping wolves out of Colorado..." sheer insanity.
Is that important for the nation and Colorado...don't think so!
you do realize what she implied by that?
What’s so “insane” about that comment?
@@mikehunt3222 it's literally a Colorado State problem not a national legislation problem.
@@mikehunt3222 It demonstrates neither awareness of or respect for the world as it exists, which includes wolves, who inhabited the territory now known as Colorado long before any of Boebert's kind did. Nor awareness of or respect for the role that wolves play in an ecosystem.
As Mitch Mcconnell said " Every one in America knows whose responsible for Jan 6. And he was , indeed, a republican.
Mope Pelosi is a diehard Democrat
Is referring to RINO Mitch supposed to mean something?
And Mitch needs to go
@@christineolsson5037 like….yesterday!
@@houseadams4841 thank you
Huge props to AOC. Sitting across from the twitching fool who posted memes of him killing her and then the jack-fool who kept asking her and the others to identify who they should fear. As if there is NO reason to mistrust them.
Poor AOC the border hopper who couldn't handle some internet memes
Its not the GUN! ITS THE PERSON BEHIND THE GUN!!!!!
Alec Baldwin is a good example of that.
Background check is a requirement before you can buy a gun. Are you going pick and choose who is able to carry a gun? You will slap with discrimination.
U are so far right. 😠 Yr country is in such a bloody mess. Carrying weapons into Government.
Too many emotions in a divided room. Firearms have no place there. I know from experience!
Right
The chair smirks a lot.
He is not taking this matter serious at all and I don’t blame him. I would’ve burst out laughing because they’re fighting like children in a sandbox.
How desperately sad to live in a country where people can even consider the possibility of carrying a gun into a governmental committee meeting.
why?
How sad that there are people like you who think it's sad. 120 years ago when people respected the constitution, it would not even have to be discussed. If you don't like the constitution, change it. Oh yea that right, you've already neutered it. First the second amendment, now the first!
Happens everyday in courts. How dumb are you people… Read the constitution again and if you don’t like it LEAVE!
@@michaelleblanc5396 do you always struggle so hard to understand the obvious?
@johnhill7585 you mean the constitution that says that the people of a state as a whole have the right to have a well trained and organized state militia to protect the state and its people?
Don't worry. Nobody is trying to get rid of that right as specified in the second amendment.
As for the past let's go back 150 years to the old west where most towns had laws requiring that anybody who came into town in possession of a gun had to immediately hand over the gun to an authority figure such as the sheriff or to the owner of the town hotel.
Power attracts the worst and corrupts the best
Dude was sweating at AOC's questions
He was too scared to answer, total 😺, if I were AOC I’d go in there strapped too. What is the reason for anyone in congress to be walking around with a gun? The question should be asked, who does he/ she feel that is a threat to them that they feel they need to walk around with a gun
Huh...didn't seem it to me.
To me, it looked like he was trying not to laugh at her lol.
AOC and Barack Hussein Obama , Planned All The 911 Attacks and All The Radial Muslins Attacks and Yes We Only Have Our Freedom Be😢 Of Our 2nd Amendment 😊
I have never seen someone trying hold back laughter so hard before. AOC's grandstanding is always good for a nice chuckle.
The ones that feel the need to carry a firearm in there ...What/Who are they afraid of ???
Most of them.
Obviously You Don't Conceal Carry ; Do You ?!
Themselves.
Not pandering enough. That’s what they are afraid of
Democracy
I love what appears to be a smirk on his face each time he answers her.
Maybe he's a rude idiot.
@Walter Pierce or he is holding back laughter from asinine questions?
What puts a smirk on my face is republicans swearing the dems are the ones changing narratives or lying about events.
Also how are those questions asinine when Boebart is indeed suggesting carrying weapons anywhere in government buildings.
@Daniel Essex it's asinine how much noise democrats make about guns except in, Chicago, Maryland, Philadelphia, Saint Louis, etc etc. It's asinine how they make so much noise about taking rights from responsible gun owners and no bail for irresponsible gun users.
But you are probably incapable of seeing the difference.
@@efunkyman6853 Another racist comment.
Using a gun to harm others is not a "form of character" , but rather a thing of "opportunity" if you have a gun while you are really pissed off, you are more likely to shoot someone than if you didn't have a gun at that moment.
Most sane people that own guns don't even think about that, what you described is the criminal mind, House members are not criminals at least not in that capacity, they have too much to lose, this is all about a matter of protection as we saw what happened on Jan. 6th and the shooting at Republicans baseball practice that nearly killed Steve Schalise. The homicidal threats most assuredly always come from pyschos outside Congress.
@@tonyrame7548 Most mass shootings come from WHIITE MEN, who somehow always seem to surprise those around them. Whatever excuse you want to find, if you look up statistics, you will see, it is a matter of a moment of anger, and to think "it wont happen to this one" has been been disproven by so many shootings of inocent people by cops, and other people because " we feared for our lives"; what do you think it will take to Triger people who are afraid of their own shadows. Most politicians are are not "brave" people. One thing is to own a gun, another is to think you can only be safe by bringing it to work. That behavior in and of itself starts a domino effect. I was in the military and never had teh need to walk around with a gun, even in other countries, except when it was my turn at guard. Congress men are not well balanced individuals, they are usually narcissist's to some degree at best. Many suffer from paranoia at different degrees, and either compulsory liars, or delusional to some degree. Those people youa re going to argue are "well balanced "? lol naw man I dont think even you believe that one.
Lot's of crazy anger in the house.
Please provide statistical back up to your claim.
This is ridiculous. Are they seriously debating carrying a weapon into committee? What a waste of money.
Karine needs to be there to "answer" all of aoc questions
ahahaha, good one, this video gets hysterical at 17:04
aoc was soo mad she kicked down her stall door and bit 2 of her handlers
@@lindarock4128 💯
She didn’t get a question answered. Apparently that’s too hard for republicans
I was hoping someone would say... "I don't trust you"
The thing is, they do trust them... to do something stupid.
Both good points!!
From the same people who demand GFZ in schools were our children are at high risk, but have armed detail protecting them at all times.
Ask AOC if she's willing to give up her security guards to go defend our nation's children, and i bet I know her answer.
Maybe because some of those congress members have been physically threatened? Some of them have been targeted by shooting them in a political ads. You don't think those congress members should be more wary of their safety?
From Tuckers lips to your ears…..
Makes sense if your dizzy, drugged or drunk I suppose.
GFZ, as all sane people know, allows stiffer penalties to be charged against anyone committing a crime with a gun there. THAT is why they were created, because it is so extremely heinous to bring a gun around children that they deserve harsher punishment.
Second Amendment. All that needs to be said.
Exactly 💯
Couldn't help but laugh when Boerbert said the phrase "highly vetted individuals". Does the term refers to George Santos, or Madison Crawford?
Yes they should be able to carry
To purchase arms is their 2A right under the constitution but to carry them into the house or senate must be debated and voted on ! This is why a constitutional Republic is so transparent and fair ! But there is one thing I can assure that if all members decide to be armed you can bet your bottom dollar that there will never be any attempt at a real insurrection ever !
We all need to know!!! We all live in America! And it's our right!
But not in federal buildings. Why are our representatives able to have more rights than the common people?
I would like to hear AOC’s version of the constitution. Also if she feels that scared she should not be there.🙄
you should not feel scared in your work place is the point
@@leroybrown2641 no... the point is " the God given right to protect person, papers, property "...
Two articles:
Give me your money, racist.
And shut up.
maybe SHE should learn to carry so she is not so scared lol
@@donnaturner4795 you're right,,, It's written in the bible... in the letter to the American... the last book of the new testament just after the Apocalypse...
"Republicans didn't incite Jan 6"! Boebert is living on an alternative planet.
Actually she's correct. Between the doors being opened by capital police. To Pelosi refusing to bring in extra security. To Ray Epps being on video telling people they needed to go into the Capital..
Anyone can tell you they're whatever, until you look into their history.
@@chriswilliamson806 Maybe in your parallel MAGA universe, but in the real world we all know what went on!
@capnordest actually, what I wrote was accurate. Ray Epps is on camera, but has been hidden. I'm not a Republican, but if you are naive to the point you think Republicans are solely responsible for ALL January 6 events. You and others would be kidding yourselves on what really was going on.
These are actual facts, and not some theory or magical wonderland I'm dreaming up.
If, you and others would do some investigating yourselves. How about you actually look into it. Instead of taking whatever you've been told as bold face facts.
@@chriswilliamson806 We have Jack Smith looking into it for us. Think I will wait and see what he says!
Where do you live. Take off the blinders. 2 years later and you are still promoting that there was no insurrection. WAKE UP
So this is why nothing ever gets done.
Your upset gun grabbers didn't get their way?
I found this refreshing. Pointing out they were not unarmed, they were DISARMED, and made helpless.
Well then...seems to me those that was hollering insurrection would want firearms...
Yeah you would think so but then again since as they were the ones to orchestrate the whole thing trying to create a way to offset all the bad publicity that they're little animals they at least on the cities to burn them and riot and loot had caused them means that they know they aren't actually in danger. It's just like them knowing the whole time that there was medication that if taken when you caught COVID it would allow you to survive but they suppressed it so they could push a vaccine that never worked. Typical Democrat bullshit. But it was entertaining to watch
Shows you how much of an insurrection it really was
LOL
For all these politicians that are against the 2nd amendment, go pitch a tent at the boarder for a weekend with no armed guards, tell us how safe you are.
No one is “against “ the 2A. Stop with the Cliff notes already.
Sue lives in North Dakota but still whining about the border
Yeah and take sleepy Joe and cackle Kamala with them 😊
That VERY FACT that they are actually discussing this is scary as s**t
NO it's healthy!! Get it through your metro or suburban head.
@@johnhill7585 No it's not. Can you imagine going to a meeting at your job to discuss the rules of a committee to run a project and you are arguing about whether members should be allowed to bring GUNS into the meetings! I swear congress is the single most toxic workplace I have ever seen. I don't know how they actually run the country.
Televising this on a loop in U.S Government classes would wake up a few future office holders.
Guns in committee rooms or the house floor is f ing insane..
You know what's insane, asking a person in congress what the definition of a woman is and them not being able the answer it based on some bs new radical agenda.
and might lead to more heated debate! All for it. AOCs argument is baffling. Rules won't stop a gunman, period.
@@jhrost oh so why have laws at all if people do what they want? Abolish all laws of that's what you believe.
@@DarleneT Some laws are effective, while others are feel good legislation. This rule would have zero real world effect, other than depriving individuals of their right to self protection. Some laws hold people accountable for crimes after the fact, which is effectively what this rule would do. It wouldn’t prevent anything. If your concern is members of congress to killing each other, maybe we should make murder illegal. Or we can argue about whether or not they were j-walking on their way to the crime scene.
Why, because you're projecting your mental instabilities on other people?
Normal armed people interact with other people everyday and don't randomly start shooting.
At the 16 minute mark I lost my shit for about 5 minutes. After I caught my breath and stopped laughing, I had to watch it again.
im not there yet man
hold on
That was funny. Obviously, a jab at George Santos and the GOP who continue to support the pathological liar.
I think the republican that he was talking to made the best face in the world to that one lol
Yeah, watching the gentleman on Huffman's right trying not to crack up -- priceless!
Hah! I was contemplating having a wee smoke and watching it again. Maybe it will make sense?
Fear is such a powerful weapon against the weak.
To manipulate people. OMG they cutting social security. And Biden's best line when talking to blacks, "Republicans are gonna put you all in chains."
Fear is such a great way to manipulate people into victim mentality and keep them there. AOC and others need to stop their whining and get some work done
@@JustMe-zk2wh I'm sorry dude but 1) I don't want to know that I'm going in to a workplace that should be secure that I have to worry about a constituent who has a gun, is a little unstable, might have a bad day. 2) That everyone has interpreted the rules as acceptable to carry so there might be a crazy day when everyone's having a bad day and I'm stuck in the middle of it.
@binh Huynh so to have a ccl you can't have certain charges on your police record, especially violent ones. Yet here we are with sitting members that have these kinds of charges and are probably more unpredictable than someone with a ccl. Ps in reference to the security of the building, you drive a point with the key words SHOULD BE.
Yet, fear has never created a job. Odd, eh?
Concept: Law Makers should be familiar with The Laws that exist when they are working on making new laws or editing or deleting existing laws…
...and not try to baffle their fellow committee members with bullshit.
Every single day everyone walks by many many many concealed guns and they wouldn’t even know. God they’re nuts.
People are not concerned about the concealed guns that remain concealed. It's the ones that come out of concealment for the wrong reasons that are concerning. If nobody ever got shot by the crazy ones, this would not be an issue.
@@scytaleghola5969 And yet the places in this country with the most random firearm violence are the places with the most restrictive laws on the books.
@@elderblackdragon Not quite the right way to say it. The places with the highest rates of gun violence are places where often more restrictive gun laws are deployed as a reaction to that violence.
Unless your hypothesis is that restrictive gun laws drive people to commit more gun crimes...
@@scytaleghola5969 soo hows that working out?
@@lindarock4128 You do not need to convince me of the ineffectiveness of gun regulations in America. I know first hand.
I am not promoting a gun regulation agenda. My only point was that most anti-gun people are not concerned about responsible gun owners (such that they exist). They are concerned about the irresponsible ones.
In the same way that fear drives many people to own guns, fear also drives other people to try and restrict those guns. A large majority of Americans live their lives in fear of one thing or another and most do not react rationally to that fear.
The Supreme Court has ruled that your safety is your own responsibility.
Run on the money They also said it's the duty and obligation of the individual citizen to do so Nice reference
Castle Rock v Gonzalez
@@bobfoster687 Thanks I hadn't even heard of that one before. It's just more proof that even with officers that believe in trying to come to the ages civilians they can't and unfortunately our legal system is working against the victims and for the criminals Thanks for sharing that information.
Then what’s the function of the police, sheriffs, and any form of law enforcement?
“We’re entitled to your interpretation of the house rules”.
I'm so happy Bobert acknowledges that the capitol police were over whelmed and should be credited for their courageous deeds. I bet she voted to reward them with medals of honour!
Hahahaha, ah sarcasm is always funny.
they were overwhelmed huh? I wonder who was in charge of the amount of capital police when they were DENIED BACKUP.....
@@corryburton9834, informed people whose reading is not confined to QAnon misinformation know the answer to that question
@@corryburton9834 wonder who sent the attackers...
@@corryburton9834 _"I wonder who was in charge of the amount of capital police when they were DENIED BACKUP"_ 🤦
And _who_ denied the backup? Your _lieber Führer_ \o ("dear Leader") and his lacky's in the Pentagon.
Bobert is the future deal with it.
God bless and protect her
Speaking of grilling, I thought she was against gas stoves.
🤣🤣 yeah but I guess you wouldn't have any problem eating a steak cooked on one 🤣
AOCD has a gas stove. Gas has a smell so you know if there's a leak. No smell no problem.
Mind-blowing!!!!
"(having a firearm) wouldn't worry you, would it? I mean, if you don't see it and most particularly if you don't hear it." English Bob, Unforgiven
AOC is more annoying than losing electricity at home.
Last time I check, within the first 3 words of the 2nd amendment it literally says “well regulated” , not “anywhere, anytime, of any kind.”
"Well Regulated" Literally means Well equiped & trained....in order to protect the security of a free State.... Then it goes on to to say that the RIGHT of the PEOPLE to keep & bear( own and use) Arms SHALL NOT be infringed....
What sense would it make for a Free States security being dependent on firearms, need those firearms to be restricted to Time, place and Manor restrictions of the Government they would be defending their Free State against?
Like we're sorry we "Well Regulated" your "Free States" security to Cap and Ball revolvers and Black power Muskets but only after a Fortnight on the third Wednesday of February of each leap year .... Outside of that timeline you MUST be submissive to oppression or WE the Government will use F15 against YOU the people (That's a quote from POTUS by the way)
@@shane35fowler actually “regulated” literally means to control/Oversee/manage something by means of rules…open a dictionary .
@@alanajacobs9882 @Alana Jacobs oh Honey..... History and context are certainly lost on you.
You are correct....the definition today does means that.
However at the time the Constitution was written it was LITERALLY a document to protect the people FROM the government as they had just fought a war to stop the oppression of tyranny.
In that period "well-regulated”-meaning trained and equiped to standards set by the federal government"
Read the founders Federalist and even Anti-Federalist papers... It isn't even up for debate.
You can claim that well Regulated means with all the government restrictions possible and under their rule just like you can claim the 2A only applies to Muskets.
But if that's the case your free speech is only covered by a twill pen and parchment sheet. The Bill of Rights isn't a privilege like driving a car. It's a RIGHT granted to you by the creator (whomever you believe that to be.... Ancient Gods or descendants of Monkeys 🤷🏼♂️ it's still protected by the same document).
Please come correct to debate next time. Whatever "The dictionary NOW says it's so, so it must be" is trash.
@@shane35fowler fine if you wanna use that definition…so you’re gonna just skip over the word “militia” in your defense? For someone who is stuck on what the definition was back then you seem to gloss over a thing called context. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state. The founders wrote the 2nd amendment after defeating a totalitarian monarch, hence why they said “is necessary for the security of a free state.” It’s used in the context of protection against a totalitarian government.
Secondly, even in the Heller case the Supreme Court said while their interpretation of the 2nd amendment gives individuals the right to possess firearms, it doesn’t permit for any kind of firearm you want, stating individuals have the right to arms for only traditionally lawful purposes- if someone has 30 firearms or a sawed off shotgun or bump stock or unregistered/ghost gun they’re not planning on using them for anything lawful. Same reason why the government has laws restricting how much Sudafed you can buy. Texas literally has a law restricting the amount of dildos you can own, but you can own as many guns as you want and if you’re over 21 you don’t need a permit or training. Also in many states a person has to be CONVICTED of domestic violence for them to be banned from owning a gun, which is why tens of thousands of women who have their partners arrested for domestic violence still end up dead, because a court conviction takes a long time after an initial arrest.
Finally, constitutional rights are not absolute. There are limits to free speech, hence why we have defamation laws, or maybe see what happens if you incite violence or chaos (like yelling bomb on an airplane). Another example is that People also can’t use their freedom of religion to discriminate against people they don’t like.
@@shane35fowler you don’t need to be a PhD to understand the correlation between access to guns and the number of guns deaths. We don’t have more criminals or mentally ill people or violent video games than any other country.
This is insane, for what reason would a firearm be necessary in a committee meeting, except to threaten those who are unarmed?
AOC is always hoping for that gotcha moment, and is so clueless the only one she gets is herself.
You are responsible for your own safety per the Supreme Court of the United States. As was stated by some in the room, carry or don't it's up to you. 2A gives you that right and authority
You're right about the supreme Court I read one of their rulings in magazine I used to get called America's first freedom. And they also made that ruling when three women in Washington DC were trying to sue the DC Police department for not saving them after they called 911. Two thugs kicked in their door to their townhouse and the two upstairs roommates could hear them proceed to beat and rape their downstairs roommate They called 911 and we're told to stay hidden help was on the way. And while watching out the upstairs window they saw one DC police car pull up in front of the house with two officers in it cuz they could see the passenger officer They didn't have any lights on they didn't use their spotlight and they didn't even get out of the car they could see the passenger officer look at the house turn and say something to the driver and then they saw the car drive away. They tried calling 911 again and couldn't even get a response. After the noise is downstairs head stopped for a while The two upstairs women snuck down to check on their roommate and called out and found out that the two men were still there and those two men found out that they had fresh meat. The men sexually tortured and raped those women for 13 hours and then just walked out the front door and weren't caught. In my opinion they deserved to win but that's my emotional response. Supreme Court ended that on what you just said but they also stated in the ruling that the reason they lost the case is because the police meaning city state highway patrol have no legal obligation to come to the aid or rescue of the individual citizen They are not here for the protection of the individual citizen, it is the duty responsibility and obligation of the individual citizen to protect their lives their family their property by whatever means necessary up to and including deadly force with firearms. The legal responsibility of police is for the use and protection of the government and to catch a criminal after they committed a crime until they actually commit the crime there's nothing they can do, which means that you can feel really good that yes you may be robbed raped or killed but the cops are supposed to be responsible about catching the guy after you've been victimized.
2A prevents the government from restricting your right and authority to carry. It does not grant you the right to carry. That right exists prior to and independent of any government.
Well organized moolisha
@@flatebo1 yep inalienable right being affirmed
Wow ignorance is rampant in the US
She didn’t “grill’ chit. She was just giving herself a headache with her stupid questions lol. They guy was laughing at her knowing she was clueless lol😂
what was stupid about the questions? they were pretty straight forward.
@@semitope no they were not straight forward.
It’s very stupid for a 3rd term Congress birther person to not know there is house rule admin to advise her on house rules. start there.
@@edimeanz What's pathetic is that the chairman doesn't know the rules.
@@charlymaiden President? This doesn't involve Biden. The Chair knows the rules, he just doesn't want to engage in the theater act she is playing.
Hopefully, it wasn’t a gas grill.
This is a perfect example of why nothing important gets done they are to busy quibbling over who did or said what. Not a single concern over those they are supposed to represent or what they are there to actually do. .
Question. Why do you need to "carry " while at the Capitol Building?🤔
Where you there on January 6?
@@jc2437 But that's what the Capitol Police is for. And why metal detectors should be placed there.
Because oath breakers are in the House and senate.
Why do you have to have a need to exercise a constitutional right? Every citizen of the US has the right to carry a firearm as per the wording of the second amendment.
@@I3igI3adW0lf Mmmmm if that's indeed the case, than why was Reagan and conservatives in California were able to pass gun control after the Panther "exercise" their Gun Rights?
Who are they don't trust that they need to have a fire arm in a working place? Crazy
Why do other members have police escorts or private security? Apparently that doesn't seem crazy.
We don't have gun permits around here, some of my neighbors leave their garage doors open overnight and no one dares to go inside or steal their kids bikes in the front yard.
Also, people are for the most part very polite.
@OldskoolN8ive A polite society that blows your brains out for stealing a bicycle. LMAO
Well aren't you lucky, what's your point.
@@dutchdna Everyone has a choice to make, don't make bad one's, there are REAL consequences.
Your neighborhood is an exception to the rule these days.
Yep i grew up when we never needed to lock our doors. We also knew all of our neighbors. That is something i still work at. Knowing our neighbors is very important.
I'm an army veteran of 7 years, NISHAN participant, had all the training in the world, and have had and fired more different guns than the average gun owner. To this day, due to the many gun incidents I've witnessed, I don't trust anyone handling guns. Accidents do happen, stupidity happens, and bad behavior happens. I wouldn't trust anyone that says that there is nothing to fear.
They should put this stuff on prime time TV. I can't believe we actually pay these people....
If you knew anything about firearm handling or firearms specifically made for concealed carry the difficulty for accidental discharge of these are extremely tough. People misrepresent accidental discharge with people claiming they didn’t know it was loaded.
And then pulled the damn trigger.
That is the excuse of a Democrat and it could not be farther from the truth wants to ban guns. Before you can buy a gun one requirement is to attend gun safety class.
@@kimocoloma4123 Baldwin, is democrat. I resent both the left and right including the media and any judge saying it was a prop gun. A prop, can't fire a round and the barrel is weld plugged, no firing pin and a prop although real but unable to function can be owned by anyone, especially retard actors who don't know how to use basic firearm safety and say the other person sad it wasn't loaded. Its as lame as saying the person you ran her wasn't your fault because you were drunk, that doesn't fly with a judge and involuntary manslaughter is a appropriate charge for Baldwin.
50 years handling and owning firearms, and have seen one AD. A Remington rifle.
Like Alec Baldwin says, It's the gun that does the killing..
This chairman has no guts and it's going to be interesting to see how he runs this committee.
He's gonna be like the parent that just sits back and lets it happen, then tells them to go ask mom when they ask him anything directly.
If our national legislative body cannot agree that responsibility for the security of that body is properly vested in its security force (i.e. the Capitol Police), because some individual members believe that their 'personal' security - or their gun-toting ideology - overrides all other considerations, then we as a nation are in deep trouble.
We're in deep trouble.
They make donations off the sound bytes. Boebert will be sending out these clips with several donate to me emails.It’s gross. Gosar too. While they threaten other members outside the chamber.AOC made a very good point. Sounds like they are trying to be vague and push it through. Very shady.
Totally Agree - very well stated!
They should bring back duels.
I mean, if a weapon is inside the committee's room, who are they intending to shoot?
Olive oil is right
*Maybe decorum would improve in government if everyone has a firearm when talking to each other.*
And if it didn't we would still wind up in a better place because then we could get a whole brand new panel of people up there only this time we put in people that can balance a budget keep the book straight run a business 🤣
When I carry concealed nobody knows, and as long as the firearm is properly holstered there would never ever be an issue of negligence. Accidents don't happen; negligence does but negligence can be defeated completely! 2A is all AMERICAN!
The way people drive their cars, you now trust them carrying guns?!?
It was no accident when the US Military fired upon unarmed students at Kent State "Accidents don't happen"
@Sharon Zuck-Dignard people that have it in themselves to break the law will do just that. Guns are prohibited on school grounds, but did that stop the criminal from doing that?
You don’t need a gun at the Capitol. Members of Congress, as Santos demonstrates, are not vetted.
Boebert is insane.
I love thos chairman smugly smiling about AOC
It's hard to keep a straight face when she trying to regain attention. Reminds me of that meme where she is saying I just bought this radio, and it says built-in antenna, she replies I don't even know where Antenna is?
It’s a nervous smile. Not one coming from a place of strength.
"I would just say in addition that this notion that we are all responsible vetted individuals there's nothing to worry about is pretty cold comfort when we have members of this institution who it turns out weren't so well vetted"
Boom... Shakalaka!
All of our IQs have collectively dropped from watching this discussion...and we payed for it.
True.
He's worried about a congress critter stealing a firearm from a purse or jacket. Isn't that rich. Well maybe he has a point there's a lot of congress critters trying to steal the guns of law abiding citizens. What would stop them from stealing from each other?
The 2nd amendment literally states “well regulated” in the first 3 words. Regulation doesn’t mean abolition.
Boebert complaining about feeling disarmed during Jan 6 when it was her party that invited those insurrectionists in, the irony…
You mean the FBI……
Just say it already……
FAKE narrative!! The FBI, your leftist buds, provoked it and set it all up>
@@johnhill7585 Trump was still in charge of the FBI on Jan 6 so…
@@anthonylawlor9130 I mean MTG literally posted videos on her social media telling people to come to the Capitol.
@@johnhill7585 This is the best you can do? Yell “FAKE” and then claim something that 1) doesn’t make any logical sense and 2) has no proof? MTG literally posted a video inviting insurrectionists to the Capitol on her own social media. Try and keep up.
For what purpose do people want to bring firearms into the capital and what kind of message does that give?
Are they afraid of another insurrection?
But there wasn’t an insurrection. It was just a gaggle of tourists enjoying a day off, she said, with a wink and a nod.
Why would a congressional representative need to carry a weapon unless they fear for their personal safety. You can lock it up in your office but should have no need to have it in the house.
Tell that to the Republican that was shot at the capital baseball practice. Or Rand Paul that was chased while being out with his wife. The only person responsible for your safety, is you. Police are paid to serve and protect, but not everyone has that ability. Not, are you going to have access to them 24/7.
@@chriswilliamson806The poster clearly said “IN THE HOUSE”.
@@chriswilliamson806 I am talking about on the house floor . If you need to carry to conduct your business in running the office of congress then you fail in a leadership position.
@D S obviously, I understand why people should be able to carry regardless of where they are. IF, you're trained and licensed to carry. Why would you take that ability from them?
So, we literally have Veterans, some of which were special forces. You wouldn't feel comfortable with them carrying on the floor of they choose?
I believe it’s an obvious intimidation tactic. The same people fighting for it are the same ones who gave tours to the insurrectionists.
I find the chairman's fear of actually expressing his view on the rules to be incredibly craven. He's allegedly in charge and should be able to direct his committee as to the rules. If he doesn't know them he should.
He doesn't want to get any of his buddies in trouble, or he's enjoying the show. Who the fuck knows.
I watched bobbet yelling the floor plan lay out on jan 6th!🇬🇧
He just thinks you couldn't understand the rules so he's not going to waste his time trying to explain to someone that doesn't understand anything about rules .
When you took campaign donations and put them in your private account. That was against the rules.
So you don't understand rules.