Catapult Launch - The Story Behind "The Bridle" and "Bridle Catchers"

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 сен 2024
  • Hello aviation Fans!
    In this video, we explore the fascinating process of launching aircraft from the deck of an aircraft carrier using launching bridle system. Discover how the bridle and hydraulic and steam catapults were engineered to accelerate jets from 0 to over 150 mph in just a few seconds. We'll dive into the history and technical details of the launch process, supported by detailed 3D visualizations, demonstrating how the bridle secure the aircraft and ensured a safe, rapid launch. Whether you're an aviation enthusiast or just curious about naval engineering, this video offers a comprehensive look at the technology behind carrier-based aircraft operations
    Please leave a comment, like and subscribe my channel
    Enjoy!
    ------------------------------------
    Models and Animations done in Blender & Autodesk Maya
    ------------------------------------
    References:
    Innovation in Carrier Aviation - Thomas C. Hone, Norman Friedman, Mark D. Mandeles
    Method For Estimating The Catapult Performance Of A Carrier-Based Airplane - Prepared under Navy, Bureau of Naval Weapons
    Aviation Boatswain's Mate E1 & C - Naval Education and Training Command
    ------------------------------------
    3rd party video/photos clips used:
    WWII Aircraft Carrier Operations - (2022 3 2) Air Zoo Archive
    Catapulting off a US Navy Carrier - 1944
    USS Cape Gloucester CVE-109 Flight Operations Near Pearl Harbor WW2
    Escort Carriers in Action - Windham Bay USS Makin Island Typhoon Connie Okinawa FM-2 TBM F4U
    ENTERPRISE LAUNCHES F6F BY CATAPULT AUG 1944
    F4U-4 Corsair loses a drop tank while launching from USS Boxer in June 1951
    Mes Années Marine 08 Manoeuvres aviation sur le Clémenceau
    HMS Ark Royal 1975 Opération_Buccanneer S2 F-4 Phamtom II
    Classic Aircraft Carrier Color USS Midway Flight Ops 1950s - F2H Banshee AJ Savage Nuclear Capable
    Us Carrier Ends Trial (1962)
    USS Oriskany - 1970 at the flight deck - part 23
    USS Oriskany - 1970 at the flight deck - part 13
    1963 TOUR OF THE USS ORISKANY (CV-34) PREVIOUSLY UNSEEN 16mm FILM
    USS Oriskany launches F9F Panther fighters during the Korean war
    Operation Saratoga (1965)
    USS Ranger flight ops
    USS Coral Sea CVA-43 - A-4 Bullpup loading and flight ops - July 1965
    USS Coral Sea CVA-43 - May 1965
    USS Boxer First Action at Inchon - Korean War - F4U Corsair AD Skyraider
    Porte avions Foch et Super étendard ( 1999 )
    Brazilian aircraft carrier (NAe São Paulo)
    USS Shangri-La 1962 A-4B Skyhawk Deck Landings Med
    TBM (TBF) Avenger Carrier Qualification Operations USS Vella Gulf (CVE-111) during WW2
    Ready On Arrival (1966)
    USS Carl Vinson in the Philippine Sea
    USS Enterprise CVN-65
    E-2d Advanced Hawkeye - Stealth Fighter Jet Hunter Takes Off from Carrier USS Gerald R. Ford
    VF-111 Sundowners USS Carl Vinson [The Reboot]
    F-4J Phantom IIs on USS Saratoga (1969)
    Royal Navy F-4K Phantom FG-1 aboard US Navy USS Saratoga (1969)
    Classic Phantom and Skyhawk Carrier Launches
    Launch & Recover (1960)
    ------------------------------------
    Music:
    Melodic Lofi Chill (Music For Videos) - Alone by Alex Productions
    Chill Piano Electronic Music (For Videos) - Home by Neutrin05
    Copyright Free Ambient Music - Fragments by AERHEAD
    Chillout Chill House (Music For Videos) - Lights by Sappheiros

Комментарии • 73

  • @jeffkrob4972
    @jeffkrob4972 18 дней назад +34

    THANK YOU, THANK YOU - I've always wonder how the bridle catapult system worked. I never know it was THAT complex ;-) The only thing left out was the associated 'hold-back' system.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  18 дней назад +1

      Thank You. I’ve made a video about holdbacks. Check it out😉

    • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
      @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 12 дней назад +1

      ​@@x-planed>>> I agree. This is the first thing I have seen that REALLY EXPLAINS how bridles worked.

  • @petesheppard1709
    @petesheppard1709 17 дней назад +15

    A bit of trivia: In WWII, the British called the devices built onto carriers, 'accelerators'. They used 'catapult' for launchers on battleships and cruisers.
    ALSO: The shuttle is the part that actually pulls the aircraft down the cat.

  • @joehoeing6590
    @joehoeing6590 17 дней назад +15

    Great explanation, thank you. The launch bar was a massive improvement; the bridles did unfortunately break. It was rare, but often fatal if the bridle snapped before the aircraft had sufficient air speed and/or the bridle hit the underside of the aircraft, kicking the nose up and inducing too high an angle-of-attack. Saw an F-4 go down off cat 1; the RIO ejected with a good chute, the pilot's chute didn't open. Very bad day.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  17 дней назад +1

      Wow. Was it Your personal experience?

    • @joehoeing6590
      @joehoeing6590 17 дней назад +3

      @@x-planed Yes

    • @Kenneth-jj8po
      @Kenneth-jj8po 12 дней назад +1

      Yeah I knew the extensions as bridle snap back protectors my first command USS Independence had mebbe 3 types out of the airwing that used nose launchbars. There was an adapter that fit over the cat shuttle to switch from bridles to launch bars. My first sight of a launch bar evo thot it might snatch the nose gear off😳. Heck the Indy had four 5' 54 caliber radar aimed gun turrets for BPDS. Had one of the last Nam era airwings. Traded F4s for F14s after SLEP

    • @Kenneth-jj8po
      @Kenneth-jj8po 12 дней назад

      Well broken bridles or cold cats. You pays yo money and you takes yo chances, always amazed by A4 nose wheel STEERERS😮

    • @Kenneth-jj8po
      @Kenneth-jj8po 12 дней назад

      And cross decked with the Ark Royal. 3 of their ac remain fixed in my memory the launch of their F4s and their Buccanner, the strange Gannet and the British sailor whot whot!!!

  • @eyerollthereforeiam1709
    @eyerollthereforeiam1709 18 дней назад +7

    This is something I've wondered about. Thank you for this video, you explain it well.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  18 дней назад +1

      Thanks Mate. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @jaysonpida5379
    @jaysonpida5379 18 дней назад +4

    Thanks! Never precisely knew how the entire system worked....

  • @boggy8557
    @boggy8557 5 дней назад +1

    Finally a clear explanation about the bridle system! Ive been wondering about this for ages. Thank you.

  • @michaelmappin4425
    @michaelmappin4425 День назад +3

    Here are some interesting tidbits for you. The first US carrier to be built without bridle arresters was USS Theodore Roosevelt. All previous Nimitz class carriers had them removed in the shipyard after the A-3D Skywarrior went out of service. It was the last bridle launch aircraft to leave active service in late 1991. USS Enterprise was scheduled to have her bridle arresters removed, but the commanding officer wouldn't allow it. He wanted them to remain to ensure that Enterprise would retain her status as longest aircraft carrier at 1122 feet.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  День назад +1

      Good to know. Thank You

    • @michaelmappin4425
      @michaelmappin4425 День назад

      Enterprise bow horns can be seen in Google Earth on 20 September 2024 at 36.9794996, -76.4403682

  • @MorDarek
    @MorDarek 12 дней назад +3

    Great job! Great video! Thanks :)

  • @pete1631
    @pete1631 17 дней назад +2

    Absolutely brilliant! Thank you.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  17 дней назад

      Thanks. Your welcome. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @larryjenkinson5525
    @larryjenkinson5525 18 дней назад +3

    🇦🇺 Excellent video. Great to get an understanding of how things work.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  18 дней назад

      Thank You. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @motorv8N
    @motorv8N День назад +1

    Very interesting - thank you!

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 12 дней назад +4

    Great channel but just a minor but important correction. Early planes always relied on the aircraft carrier to speed at full power and head into the wind to get them into the air. I am pretty sure they still do this too as a added safety measure. They never relied on the aircraft alone lift to get into the air. Witness the Doolittle raid and the B25 as this.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  12 дней назад +2

      I didn’t mention this as I thought it was too obvious😉

  • @craiggoodyear352
    @craiggoodyear352 16 дней назад +2

    Thank you for the answers to questions I'd never thought of asking!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  15 дней назад

      You’re welcome. Hope U subscribed😉

  • @rocksnot952
    @rocksnot952 11 дней назад

    Nice to have these explained. Change in naval technology can be slow, but thank goodness for the modern steam/electromagnetic catatapults.

  • @terryboehler5752
    @terryboehler5752 15 дней назад

    I've waited forever for this. Absolutely great

  • @johnjones5354
    @johnjones5354 17 дней назад +1

    Nice, very detailed explanation.

  • @ekuche8335
    @ekuche8335 18 дней назад +2

    Nice

  • @adecarnally5501
    @adecarnally5501 16 дней назад +1

    Superb as ever. Thank you.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  16 дней назад

      Thanks Mate😉

  • @ronaldtartaglia4459
    @ronaldtartaglia4459 18 дней назад +2

    Been waiting for this for decades!!!!! Thank you!

  • @dywanixproductions
    @dywanixproductions 16 дней назад +1

    Szkoda że nie robisz filmów częściej bo są bardzo dobrej jakości😋Dzięki za ten!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  16 дней назад

      Dzięki, choć ostatnio staram się częściej😉

  • @williamgalbraith3621
    @williamgalbraith3621 15 дней назад

    Thanx! I'm finally educated!

  • @CraigCholar
    @CraigCholar 10 дней назад +1

    Until today, I was among the unwashed heathens who are unaware this channel exists. Lo, the RUclips video suggestions gods made this video appear before my astonished eyes. I am now among the joyful annointed ones who have subscribed. I feel blessed.

  • @ethanmckinney203
    @ethanmckinney203 13 дней назад

    Now you just have to cover the British launch trolleys!

  • @SolomonSamson747
    @SolomonSamson747 15 дней назад

    Nice OA-4M model at 5:22! Rare bird

  • @TimMeinschein-j4s
    @TimMeinschein-j4s 17 дней назад +2

    Sorry, but the last time I served on a "bird farm" was 1982... If I recall correctly for the various RN (and variations like RCN & RAN) what the US Navy calls Bridles they call Strops (like what a barber used to sharpen his straight edge razor on)....

  • @garyt4800
    @garyt4800 День назад

    We only had one aircraft that required bridles on the Chucky V. The WHALE!

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman 12 дней назад +1

    At about 02:54 in this video...
    *BIG OOPS...😱*

  • @nikolay9584
    @nikolay9584 12 дней назад

    I always thought launch bar as the only option because of every movie showing take off from carrier closely shows Tomcats or Hornets only.

  • @ronaldtartaglia4459
    @ronaldtartaglia4459 18 дней назад +5

    2:54 corsair loses its tank

    • @envitech02
      @envitech02 17 дней назад +1

      Luckily did not explode and kill sailors.

    • @DaveGIS123
      @DaveGIS123 14 дней назад +3

      Somebody must have got yelled at for not attaching the tank right.

    • @ethanmckinney203
      @ethanmckinney203 13 дней назад +1

      Yeah, you can see the guy with the fire hose running from the right, then he stops when he realizes there's no fire. I think there wasn't even a fuel leak.

  • @fooman2108
    @fooman2108 16 дней назад +1

    The vast majority of catapault launches on USN carriers was of LAND-BASED Army (air corps) ferrying aircraft to forward bases.

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 17 дней назад

    Thanks to movies like Final Countdown and Flight of the Intruder, as a kid I am always intrigued by the "buck teeth" jutting out from the bow of carriers. No idea what it's for, till the advent of Internet and RUclips.

  • @josephnason8770
    @josephnason8770 17 дней назад +2

    There must be millions of bridles at the bottom of the sea.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  17 дней назад

      No doubt about it😉

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 2 дня назад

      Right next to all the sonobouys dropped from patrol aircraft.

    • @michaelmappin4425
      @michaelmappin4425 День назад

      Not near as many as there are arresting gear cross deck pendants. They are good for 100 traps, which means about 1000 of them get sunk every 6 months per deployed or actively training carrier. I always wondered how many fish got nailed by them as they sunk.

  • @flyboy126
    @flyboy126 15 дней назад +1

    My dad flew Phantoms and for the F-4 there is this little red metal dubmbell looking thing that would sanp on each launch, Would love to know how that was incorporated into the bridle system.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  15 дней назад

      It was called a „dogbone”. I’m elaborating about it in my video about holdback. Check it out😉

    • @flyboy126
      @flyboy126 15 дней назад +1

      @@x-planed Will do thank you!! I have a complete one and one that launched my dad, I'll be so happy to finally learn where that fits in!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  15 дней назад +1

      I think You should like it😉

    • @flyboy126
      @flyboy126 15 дней назад +1

      @@x-planed definitely subbed, worked in aviation for over 30 years and warbirds for over 20 years, and a few of your videos already covered some cool stuff. Thank you!!

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  15 дней назад

      Thanks Mate. What do You specifically do in aviation?

  • @peterforden5917
    @peterforden5917 15 дней назад +1

    Interesting, but this only really applies to U.S. style carriers. The British ( who invented the modern style of carrier back in the 20's) as they did pretty much everything on a modern carrier from, angled flight decks , optical landing signals,radar(modern micrometer radar not the pre war stuff used by the U.S. Germany and Japan, they were first to land a jet aircraft on a carrier (an early mark DH Vampire) etc etc

  • @TimMeinschein-j4s
    @TimMeinschein-j4s 17 дней назад +1

    Actually, a major factor for ( WW2) takeoffs and landings was Wind Speed Over The Deck! This is why most successful WW2 carriers could make 30 knots! So, if you're "making turns" for 30 knots, into a 25 knot wind, you've already given the airplane 55 knots with of take off speed!!

    • @johnknapp952
      @johnknapp952 14 дней назад +1

      The concept still applies today. But you need the catapult to get the extra speed for the now heavier planes.

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 17 дней назад +1

    1:23 This is the most dangerous job in the world, working mere feet from a spinning propeller (and later, spinning turbines) that can turn a human being into fine minced meat in an instant. At least as an infantryman who get killed by bullets, you do get a body to bury but not when you're minced meat.

  • @chrissearle6176
    @chrissearle6176 21 час назад

    Another misinformation video.
    Everything in this video was first used & developed by the British, even the catchers are British, though they were deemed impractical for the Royal Navy due to aircraft type & catapult size as catchers slightly reduce the end performance & it wasn't till over powered future proof launchers were installed that it became practical. The Royal Navys future proofing was out of date allmost immediately as the Navy took the massive leap from relatively light aircraft to the heavyweights of the F4 by which time they moved to launch bars rather than bridals as the bars enabled heavier aircraft to launch from lower pressure to reduce stress on the airframes. Launch bars could not be captured.

  • @CAG5360
    @CAG5360 9 дней назад

    Nice video 👌🏽 Very interesting well made 👍🏼🫡

  • @ronaldtartaglia4459
    @ronaldtartaglia4459 18 дней назад +2

    Did they retro fit F 4's? They were relatively new at the time.

    • @x-planed
      @x-planed  18 дней назад

      Yes, Phantoms were not equipped with launch bars