Unboxing The Roland Jupiter X Synthesizer! (With Jack's First Reaction)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 21 июл 2024
- Head over to the Andertons website to find the products in the video! | tinyurl.com/2xm8lt8c
Keyboard & Piano Department | tinyurl.com/28drufpe
Recording Department | tinyurl.com/25rl6ta2
Live/P.A. Department | tinyurl.com/24yplejg
The links below may be outdated, use the links above to start browsing the website.
👆 With a catalogue of legendary synth & drum machine sounds, Jack unboxes the incredible Roland Jupiter X Synthesizer & Workstation/ With a class-leading sound engine, perfect for complex compositions, how easy is it to use when getting it out the box? ➡️ tinyurl.com/y8see4fd
» Shop all of Roland's Synths & Workstations | tinyurl.com/ya47hq2u
↪️ Episode Guide ↩️
» 0:00 Unboxing The Roland Jupiter X
» 1:08 First Impressions
» 2:15 How Easy Is It To Use?
» 3:51 Let's Go Through Some Presets
» 9:06 Juno Preset Impressions
» 13:15 Let's Talk The Good Bits
Welcome back to another episode of Andertons TV! In today's episode, Jack takes a first look at the Roland Jupiter X Workstation & Synthesizer. With its legendary synth & drum samples, how easy can Jack navigate around the Jupiter X while not reading the manual... Known for its cutting edge music creation & intuitive control layout. Can this all-in-one vintage workstation keep up when put through a first users test?
Check out our Full In-depth Review on the Roland Jupiter X:
➡️ • Roland Jupiter X Synth...
Check out our No Talking, Playing Only on the Roland Jupiter X:
➡️ • Roland Jupiter X Synth...
Want to hear the First 10 Patches only?
➡️ • Roland Jupiter X Synth...
Interested in other Andertons RUclips channels? Click on one of these links to find out more…Andertons Guitar & Bass RUclips Channel: goo.gl/kRJCpb
Andertons Drummers RUclips Channel: goo.gl/9yKSS9
Andertons Synths, Keys & Tech RUclips Channel: goo.gl/ns172M
Andertons Shopping Web Site: goo.gl/TPsG2Q
Make sure to subscribe to Andertons TV for more great videos like this: goo.gl/ns172M
#Andertons #Roland #JupiterX 
Видеоклипы
Wow. I sometimes thought Jack was pro a core brand. What I have realised is Jack is about interaction. Love the level of honesty
all synths are adventures to be explored
Wow, the design of that synth is right out of the Jupiter/Juno ‘80’s. I am very happy to see in the last 5 or 10 years the return of knobs and sliders on sound machines. and some really great sonic possibilities.
You can't beat an honest, first impressions review...but that look at the end was priceless !
Jack is the man. He doesn't BS and has genuine reactions.
The thing you prove with not reading the manual is how intuitive a piece of equipment is.
Something very important is to not lose your "moment" by having to figure functions and features out, espescially when you're in that "creative high" that you might find yourself in when playing.
Love your videos, they've been entertaining me throughout the entire lockdown, so keep 'em coming!
None of the Roland instruments that I own are intuitive.
Super demo man! Best demo I've seen on youtube for the Jupiter X.Truly does justice to the potential it offers. Thanks!
More videos like these Jack. You are incredibly valuable and appreciated in the keyboard synth community. This review felt really honest and pure. Please do more of these first impression videos of new synthesizers..! Love from The netherlands
probably the most honest review I've ever seen - great stuff, Jack.
As a self-proclaimed JP-X(m) fanboy, I think this was one of the most valuable and accurate reviews posted to date. The POV of someone who just walks up to the synth at a store or a booth (no manual, no rep) is underrepresented. It’s a shame that the JP-X(m) doesn’t have a simple mode, for lack of a better word.
I think it was a mistake (worse on the Xm) to load the first bank of Presets with complex, multi-Part, I-Arp dependent Scenes. Imagine instead if they had simply dedicated the first Scene bank to single Parts, one or two each to show off the best of each model, and thrown in a few Splits and Layers of two Parts, a few with simple basic arps. Not only would this be more approachable for walk-ups and the out-of-the-box experience, but those Scenes would serve as valuable building blocks for new users. Display models could even be accompanied by single sheet laminated walkthroughs to guide the user through the absolute basic demonstration navigation. If I were a retailer looking to move units, I’d probably re-do those Scenes for a display model, but no one’s got time for that. As it stands, I’m afraid Roland shot themselves in the foot in this regard.
When I first touched the Xm at Knobcon, I was completely bewildered but the sound sold me. When I got the Xm, it took days (even with doc) to decrypt the UI, months to master it. In the end, it has been worth it, but not everyone has time for that work. Again, I think what you’ve demonstrated here is fair and valuable, Jack. I hope it catches the right eyeballs for consideration in the future.
But isn't there like logic in the system? I am about to purchase this synth. I could go for the Juno, but this one is like gold to me. It has been drawing me. I wanted the Xm and didn't buy it because of no aftertouch.
@@Geepstar a LOT has changed in two years, all for the better! A few months after this post, Roland updated X/Xm to 1.50, and it’s now up to 3.02. Out of the box, it is much more accessible and navigable. Jupiter-X remains my favorite modern synth to this day, more than ever.
@@RobertSaintJohn In may I will order one when getting holiday money. :-)
Flawless Victory!! This is a perfect review! Amazing sounds! Bit of a learning curve! Ace!
Compellingly refreshing review Jack. Thanks. And what I heard I loved. Amazing sounds.
Jack, thank you. I appreciate, and after reading some comments, others as well appreciate what you stated about walking up and playing.I'm an old guy with ADD and I have owned three Roland boards, and none of them were intuitive. I remember being so upset with the Fantom X that I sold it and bought a Motif ES. It too was painful, but not nearly as the Roland. All in all, you are the perfect dude for doing what you did and I will always come back and continue to watch your videos. Cheers.
Jack, music is about passion! (And the internet is about trolls.) Don’t listen to anyone who says you have too much enthusiasm. It’s part of the charm, and what keeps us coming back for more. I want to see more videos like this. The ones with the sales reps have their place, but it’s so much more informative to see a guy we enjoy watching give us his honest opinion about gear. We’re all here for the music - to learn things, to see new things, and to get inspired. It’s great having you here to share that with us - even when things don’t work the way you expect them to. I still think the Jup-X sounds great, especially when you were playing the bits in “PianoTown.” I was trying to figure out, though, how they programmed that, and scratching my head a bit over what I could see of the oscillators. Some of the controls are big and obvious, while others left me trying to figure out where they even were.
Jack definitely seems the type of guy you would wanna go out for a few beers out on the town with. What a lad
Loved the shout out for the Super 6; been excited for that one since seeing it makes rounds at the conferences
Just a superb series of videos, Jack. Keep up the great work.
omg the sound that comes out of that is amazing
Chin up buddy! Great, honest first impressions on opening it up! OBVIOUSLY I want one 😂 but it’s good to see an unbiased mini review.
That's the best review I've seen you do Jack. It was candid, no nonsense and from the heart. The Jupiter sounded gorgeous at times, but I get the feeling it'll be used as a preset monster, It'll be great for some who like a challenge and who will get to grips with it, but for many it will be impenetrable. But that's only my opinion try it yourself.
I would buy an X/Xm as a "preset monster", but scrolling through 1000's of presets with that ridiculously tiny screen is a nightmare.
@@ChrisP3000x Not really....I have one it's not as bad and that is one and two you can also have a live set if you set your favourite patches in one of the empty banks.
Dont beat yourself up jack...this is exactly what I need in a review... because who the hell reads the manual......ok well I do ....but if something isnt intuitve then its great to know. Sounds awesome but I fear as a non keyboard player looking for something for my studio to help record it would drive me up the wall!!
LOL so then why buy a keyboard as a non-keyboard player??
@@Darrin.Crawford what I mean is...i use keys for ambient swells/pads/ strings and sounds in the studio...I can play triads, root notes and very basic piano so i dont consider myself to be a keys player...doesnt stop me wanting a decent synth for others to use when recording so its nice for things to be easy to navigate... but I get your point...it does sound like an odd thing to say.
@@Darrin.Crawford pff, you can totally learn how to play by yourself. You'll never be a great instrumentalist but playing chords and pads comes in no time. It doesn't have to be overly complicated to sound great.
Holy crap, I would purchase the hell out of your jam at 6:20
There's always a preset to close your eyes & get lost in!
"What does my opinion matter?"
It's everything actually, you are the end-user - the person the product was designed for - if it's confusing and unintuitive, viewers want to know. Brilliant video as always, Jack. \o/
I have had my Jupiter X for just on one month now, and watching your video, I watched you go through the same rollercoaster journey of discovery I went through over the first few days. Figuring out scenes (layered parts), models, etc, is handled differently (less intuitively?) than anything I've used before. One month later, and I am starting to get used to the architecture, creating my own 'scenes', and still finding new things. You may have 'figured it out' by now. :-)
Thank you for a candid and honest video that completely resonated with my own Jupiter-X unboxing experience.
Roland has done this dozens of times in the past, and they keep doing it: they produce great-sounding instruments that are absolutely unintuitive and a pain to work with for the first few days/weeks of owning them. It's like the Japanese UI engineers keep making the same mistakes over and over. I've got the TR8S which sounds fantastic, but just to program a simple beat with more than 16 steps and saving it requires you to read the focking manual, and this shouldn't be. That's why I've always hated convoluted Roland products.
@@AlainHubertExact same experience with the TR8s here.
Lmao when you smelled it I lost it - I do the exact same thing 😄
There's only 1 way to unbox a synth... 😉
That new synth smell.... aaaaaah
Ahh, ha ha, yes!
If I had one word to describe this synth -CONFUSING!
Great video presentation - thanks for the honesty! I was trying to decide between one of these and the Nord Wave 2 at one point (I'm a Nord enthusiast, but love the Roland Jupiter 8 as well). Decisions, decisions!
Your honesty is very much appreciated! (The many ads are not).
Absolutely gorgeous 80s tones. What a fantastic synth for that late 70s/ 80s pop rock sound. Happy to dive into ten manuals if necessary to get those tones!
Thank you for your honesty Jack! I guess since the first Nord Lead in 1995 everything else seems cumbersome! ❤️
I love your honest opinions. These are the things I want to know. How easy is it to use, without reading the manual etc. How does it handle the different synth emulations within the ZenCore systems. How obvious is it all. There are no local music shops near me, so you are now doing what I would do when I used to visit local stores.
Always loving your reviews
Your opinion counts a lot jack!! Talking not talking I don't really care you'd still sell me anything lol why? Cos your videos are fun and there ain't much fun about no more!!👍👏
Jacks back baby!
Jack is always here!
Andertons Synths, Keys and Tech 😂😂
Great video man
Don't worry Jack. Looks like you were finding bits and bobs by the end. Not every synth gels with me straight away. Some just have an appeal that keeps bringing me back to it in the store so I play it two to three times a week for a few months then one day I come in and buy it. That's a dying way to trial and buy synths so I feel blessed to have had the chance to do that as my norm.
I loved the “ghost drummer” face Jack pulled at the end. I don’t see any rhythm controls, either.
We love you jack!!
Great Presentation Jack... as an owner of the Jupiter X I have the same conflicting sentiments. The sounds are amazing and once you are used to the layout it really starts to open up In possibilities. As always your raw review of gear is much needed in an overall bias world
Great sounding synth
Love these videos. Thanks
Jack is the best synth demonstrator IMO! Don't know how Andertons has all of the best!
Great video! I wouldn't worry about it. I'd just play the presets/scenes then start watching some RUclips tutorial videos and all those wonderful Synth Talk video @Ed Diaz is making. Also, @MR TUNA Music has several videos on the Jupiter X. I played it for the first time at his place. I'm sure it'll take a little diving in the menu to figure out. Enjoy the journey! Take care, Sam.
Roland has the sound that stands out! I can hear a Roland from a far...I think the resonance settings in the filter need to be adjusted to hear the desired filter sweeps...although i cannot see in detail the filter section on screen...It could also not be assigned in the patch as i do think i heard the effects change but not the cut-off..a bit bizarre. It still got a like before i even pressed play on the video...Jupiter X,Xm,Xa etc just really excite me..and i want one.
Love these, great sounds, quality and features.....don’t care if it’s analogue, digital, modelled etc it’s a great synth! Although a pretty complex one obviously.........unfortunately only thing I don’t like is the price, it really is priced as a premium instrument, which is fair enough I guess for what you get. I enjoyed seeing your impressions of it! Thanks!
I have one of these and I find it a confusing mess of a synth half the time. It sounds pretty nice, but man is it frustrating to deal with.
Love this guy!
The best bit of the video is between 12:04 - 12:08. Brilliant improvisational line. As far as the Jupiter-X goes, it's the best synthesizer on the market, no question about that. Oh yeah, to get "expected" results, one needs to initialize the scene first, to get to the single patch mode. That's the way to go through the patches on this instrument if you want the controls to do what you expect.
The first patches sound like something Anthony Phillips would play. And that is a very good thing. 😊
Was deciding between the Jupiter X and Novation Summit. Thanks Jack, Twin Peaks it is.
Mine has just now been delivered, waiting on my son to get in to unbox and play
Bought a Jupiter Xm - sent it back within a week due to the awful interface, unworkable work flow and menu diving required - watched your channel - asked whether you would go for a Jupiter X or Nord Wave 2 - you said Nord Wave 2 - took your advice and bought one - it hasn't gone back - solid advice - thanks Jack..!!
I almost bought a Jupiter-X; changed my mind and went with a Wave 2 and love it. Nord even sent me labels to replace some feature changes on the panel (thanks Nord!). I love the Roland Zen Core sounds and will probably use Zenology to get some of the classic Roland sounds. I also use a MC-101 as a sound module with an Arturia Keystep Pro. Lots to learn.
Another happy NW2 user here! Programming 4-layer programs from scratch is a breeze and the damn thing doesn't even have menus! :)
Do more unboxing videos! Loving them
I've had mine for 3 days, so far maybe spent about 12-15 hours playing with it. I love the sounds it can make, honestly it can go toe-to-to with my vintage Roland gear. It's definitely heavy - without looking at any specs I'd guess it's about as heavy as a DX7. I strongly recommend playing it through big speakers - the bigger the better. I've found that on smaller speakers, even the built-in ones, it can sound a little thin, but as soon as I plugged it into my Fender Rumble 200 (flat eq, bright switch engaged) it was almost like a spiritual experience. Currently I'm having a lot of trouble finding a flight case with wheels that actually fits it, I don't think Roland even makes one yet - that may change in the future. It is definitely very confusing and either I suck at paying attention or the user manual didn't really cover everything that thoroughly enough to build my confidence with the menu diving/button combinations. Another downside is there's not really a lot of instructional content for it on RUclips. Roland made a few videos explaining some of the big features, but with how deep this thing is I honestly think that there's a pretty big need to have in-depth tutorials for it beyond the basic 'this is how you initialize a scene' or 'this is what the i-arpeggiator can do' type of thing. Overall I really like mine, and can definitely see it replacing my whole live rig...as soon as I figure out how to use it...
For a live rig even? Wow strong endorsement. It must need a beast of a stand to support it, seems like it would be a challenge to gig with. Unless you're at a level where roadies are a given, I guess lol. If so, mad respect.
@@rdean150 yep, the keyboard split function is actually pretty easy to use, was fooling around yesterday with a SH/minimoog-style acid bass on the lower half and jupiter and juno string patches layeted together on the top half, sounded really beastly. That type of functionality plus how good the RD piano patches sound could easily replace the need for multiple keyboards dedicated to individual types of sound, or you could probably set it up as a top layer with an 88-key beneath with your leads up high and the basses down low. For a stand I'm running a Proline PL4KD single tier at the moment, it held my DX7 for around a year so I know it can handle the weight. A roller case would be a must especially if you lug your own equipment.
You point out something that should be a part of every product. And that is training resources. Like web videos and tutorials. Though this video is a perfect example of why even that has a limitation. A quick start of some sort, so that you dont have that lost puppy exhaustion look on your face that Jack does.
We have all been here one time or another. What is important is what happens next? How do we master these wild horses that we want to ride? It really is a marvelous discussion to be having. But remember, we are the keyboard player. The brains in the band. Not the drummer. We read manuals. We dont just hit stuff with a stick. Its why all the girls flock to the singer, the drummer, the guitarist, anybody but us!...
It's a behemoth for only 61 keys. How's the action? It certainly sounds great. EDIT - he said it feels "extremely premium". Oh and THANK YOU for the honest opinions about things that are not perfect. There's a reason I keep coming back to your channel. Actually there are several reasons. Thanks for this video, keep on rocking.
You know that someone's a true gearhead when they smell electronics after they open them. Respect!
I know what you mean... I was on the verge of sending mine back for a refund. This new fangled Scene Layer gets in the way of actually being creative with the sound, but delve down into tone edit and you’re in familiar territory. Just press the shift button and rotate the oscillator type knob to get immediately into tone edit, where things start working properly.
What you guys need to do is search the Jack 256 patch video The RUclips video showed what Roland should have had in sound presents. I have my X on the way and I’m definitely buying the Jack PAC !
Wouaw ! Great synth ! 🎹👏
Superb review. Thanks for the honesty Jack!!! Amazing sounding keys, but if it takes a day to get the sound you have in your head, then it's not going to be the keys for everyone. Personally I'd probably love it 'cos I'm a tweaker - and I'll never get anything played!!!
Great video Jack but I’ll wait for the more authentic (analogue) Jupiter 8 to come out ......you know, the one made by Behringer.
Snob...
It’s not going to happen “mate”.
I have heard a Jupiter 8 next to a Jupiter X your ear and mine couldn’t tell them apart with blindfolds. Behringer is pure and utter SHYTE.
@@electriceyeslide5959 Now then - try to keep your language civilised. We’re all entitled to an opinion. Happy New Year.🥳
@@strongchord4384 Shyte....
Hey Jack ..love your video's ..just sold my JP 8... crazy as it sounds..difficult decision..had it over 30 years..gonna definitely get the JP X..where can I order the Tee u r wearing?
Jack your so right, I so wanted the X but have been totally underwhelmed by it. I purchased the Fantom instead which for a few hundred quid more is , such a lot more.
the first patch feels like you´re a rocket flying as fast and violent af!
Great first impression video. I bought the X over a year ago and I still struggle. The sounds are superb, I know I can stack the same synth engine over multiple parts , but how? The I-arp/ sequencer is really difficult to program, but…OS 3.0 has just been released which hopefully sorts a lot of issues. Would I buy it again? Not without some updates to make the UI more intuitive
I think it was more a case of 'the guy whose run out of Redbull' but I enjoyed it. 😏
My days of buying hardware synths has long since passed but this does have a gorgeous sound though and I still love watching reviews.
Keep up the good work! 👍
Personally, I think it's a beautiful synth, and I always enjoy your videos Jack. Unfortunately, not many of us have over two grand to throw at a new synth though, as nice as it is. :(
Great review. I love the sounds on this but I would be frustrated with the controls in the same way.
Wished I had seen this video before buying the Jupiter X (from Anderson’s). I have owned it for 3 weeks and I am still just as mystified now as to even just playing a single patch let alone diving into programming. The fact Roland have made it look like Jupiter 8 clearly gives the impression that it is a hands on, programmable synth that will respond, as you might intuitively think. This is very far from the truth. I don’t want to face the fact that I have spent over two thousand pounds on a preset box but each time I switch it on to try and master it, I come away disappointed. I have the Arturia Jupiter 8 VST which responds very well to what I ask, when tweaking.
Roland, I feel let down. Jack thank you for a really truthful video.
Too late to take it back?
Once you learn how to program it you'll be making amazing sounds.
@PaulBailey yes, too late unfortunately because the dog has already destroyed the cardboard box!! 😂 and I do feel like I must persevere. Thank you 👍
@floridahiker fingers crossed 🤞!!
trade it in for a new fantom.
Filter issue always drives me mad! Always! Try adjusting the amp or filter envelope amount and then move the filter again. Might fix it. Also liked the comment about finding a way to potentially cutoff multiple layers with the same filter. Either way, moving the filter down and experiencing what you did is HEARTBREAKING
I'm confused with Zen Core. Can you use it to load V-Piano tones or are some exclusive to things like this Jupiter X. I know that the RD-88 can't load drum tones, for example.
Soooo many buttons and knobs. Love it and love your style of patter mate, great stuff. Also great idea to make patch 01-01 a great one!
The thing that quite excites me about this is the Zenology integration and Roland Cloud.
I am still not 100% sure how it's all gonna work but it appears to be like the old plug-out system on the Aira kit. So they've just released the JX-8P model for Zen. Can I upload that to the Jupiter X?
Eventually, most likely yes - as of writing, Roland is still in the middle of releasing the different extensions and the export is currently disabled in Zenology (you CAN export patches labelled "Z-Core" but JX-8P patches are not porting over yet).
Imho, the whole process seems very cumbersome even though the unified concept behind it is absolutely brilliant. On my PC, I can't even get Roland Cloud to start so I can't work on it on my main computer and have to use an old tablet to even see what Zenology does (and the performance is horrible in that tablet).
Wow, I just absolutely love your honesty! Yeah, I’ve never been attracted or inspired by the Roland ‘ecosystem’. I don’t really like all that layering shit, and I think that’s probably where the problem lies. The “dude in a hat” bit made me chuckle out loud. Love ya mate!
Awesome, love mine ❤️
Even when he doesn't know what he's doing it sounds good.
usability has improved significantly after several important firmware updates. this and the xm have matured into what they should have been in 2020. using the x/xm now is similar to using a nord lead but with way more features. this is my roland dream machine. if behringer make a jupiter 8 is will no doubt sound great, but it won't imo have the thrilling wow-factor of the x/xm.
The stool looks super comfy actually!
Without researching seems like one "issue" is theses scenes/presets have multiple parts and I could hear the filter affecting only part of the sound... I totally "get" how sometimes you just know that a piece of kit is really powerful and amazing but you quickly find that you just don't know how to "drive" the thing... I actually own a V-Synth XT. Fantastic bit of kit I've owned for years from new, and 99% of the time I've spent on it I've had it in the mode that emulates a D-50 because I understand that a bit more... I made my own custom version of a preset once in the native mode and saved it, and the next day I loaded it up and somehow it just sounded different, different rhythmic sounds no longer in sync. I know it was something I did, or didn't, do when saving or loading but I had NO CLUE how to get back what I'd done. JUNO-Gi I can whizz round quickly, I "get" the engine, and as a result it lives with my band's equipment and I program it "on the fly" during rehearsals... JUNO-DS I only vaguely get... Still don't get how the effects work in performance mode... That stays with me at home so if I want/need to use it live I can experiment for a day to program any performances I need... I "know" the JUPITER-X is powerful and would put anything I own to shame sound wise, but I know I would have trouble "driving" it...
I have a V Synth GT and a Jupiter X. The Jupiter is noticeably less user friendly for sound design what with that tiny screen - but power and sound quality wise, it far surpasses the V Synth.
Press part, than 1 to 5 is about editing the part, 6 to 10 will turn parts on or off
Or hold shift and press the part you want. To just play a single part
This review is gold! It´s honest and will create happy customers knowing what they´re getting and save other people from frustration!
As for Roland and UI... sorry guys, this is utter bollocks for 2020!! Give us proper interactive hardware & navigation plus easy and high level VST/AU integration, you´re a major synth brand. My Juno 60, Korg Polysix or MS20 are still superior instruments in terms of inspiration, interaction and also sound... sorry no deal.
its 2023. why dont you edit your speak now?
Okay...Now I am confused...Get this Jupiter X or Roland Fantom 6 ???
Does anyone feel that the Jupiter X should have had sound category buttons instead..ie: Brass, Choir, Piano, Strings etc.?
Does anyone know the song at 1:38 it’s actually going to drive me crazy it sounds so familiar also love the review!
Looks like you had the split and dual buttons on. Maybe that’s why the filter only worked on one part. The manual literally crashed the books app when I downloaded the pdf so be careful
This synth is crazy... LOVE what is happening at 4:45 🙌🏼 Feels like I'm ascending 😶🌫️
I can’t lie, I ordered this thing after listening to this patch!!!💯
I care deeply what the "Dude in a hat" (and "Squib Squib" sensei) thinks. I watched another video where the guy totally trashed the Jupiter X's keybed. And here a professional keyboard/piano player calls the keyboard "unbelievable." With COVID19 it is much harder to go into stores and play these things, and even then a lot of stores don't have big synth selections. I watch this channel because I value your "just walked up to it in a store" point of view. And the whole reason I love the Juno 106 (and some other synths) is because how intuitive they are. The fact that the Jupiter X doesn't have 1-to-1 recreation of the knobs as the Jupiter 8 did and the fact that the screen is so small and placed off to the left seem very poor choices to me. It's a massive heavy synth and you still don't have as much and as intuitive control as the Jupiter 8, the model they chose to brand/theme the design of this off of.
I am curious if you think it sounds better/worse/just different than the System 8. A lot of other videos online say the System 8's Juno and Jupiter models sound better.
Good review. Roland......
So, I have a Jupiter X. The only problem with it is it does too much. But to complain about the seems ridiculous. And it is not the most intuitive interface. But neither was the Prophet VS or Yamaha EX5 or VSynth or many many others. You want a synth that just is a simple analog synth? Then buy one of those. This synth is 5 part multitimbral with virtually unlimited polyphony.
If you want a simple one voice synth, than just take 30 seconds and create a scene where only one part is active and make that your default template. Takes literally 30 seconds.
Why is it people don't want to dive in a actually learn their gear?
It must be the short attention spans of people nowadays.
Bottom line is this is a great sounding synth with an incredibly deep realm of possibilities in a somewhat obtuse interface.
But it is a way better interface and much easier to use than the JDXA and I have one of those as well. That one was nearly impossibly to get around.
Really ,once you live with this thing for a couple of days it becomes easy to get around.
Granted ,there are parts of it I don't use that much on it.
I don't use the drums much, or the piano engine.
But the Zen Core,all the analog models and the XV model alone make this unit capable of really great sounds.
If you just create a default preset where these three parts are on you can make great stuff.
Full disclosure, I work with Roland a lot on my show, but I also have almost 40 years of playing, programming and collecting synths.
And I give the Roland peeps as much shit as anyone when they come out with something that just doesn't work.
You want a simple analog Roland sound but a simpler more direct interface with nice effects built in for a reasonable price ? Get a System 8.
But the Jupiter X is deep. and capable. You just gotta dig in.
i like my jupiter 80 better. i will get a fantom next....
Jack you’re a REAL dude. Love you
Big salut from France 🇫🇷
ViNZ
“Self driving car and I’m scared” 😂Great review - sounds beautiful, interface nightmare. Roland is forgetting they’re making musical instruments - music needs emotional, tactile, expressive, joyful, right-brain stuff
I can understand this view but this was clearly aimed for people familiar with synths that want that premium feature rich experience, Also if youre spending 2700 on this, Id hope you would read the manual, thats a lot of money to waste not knowing a lot of its features, kinda shooting yourself in the foot but just my opinion. I only have a microfreak and am very new to synthesis but I have been looking at this as a full fledged keyboard/synthesizer to get!
Great and honest review, Jack. It will probably not be a big seller.
I dont have one, but I guess since its a multitimbral synth with 4 patches layered, that the cutoff only controls one layer, and the layer its controlling is not the one you are expecting. Sounds great though
It sounds good the action is meh the Jupiter 80 has a better action. I’m saying that cause I have one.
Actually you can control any layer you want or you can group layers to be controlled.
That's exactly what it sounds like. Only one layer is cut off. And you know what...this video is so honest. I'm serious. We need to see fails they are as valuable as wins.
@@BrandonRyan you can if know how which he didn't. Considering how much time he has spent with this and the XM though he probably should know it defaults to layered sounds
@@redplanet9162 it is definitely a pro and a con to this synth. He would have been fine with a system 8 in front of him. Or even the fantom
Thank you for being honest.
Gotta smell a new keyboard 👍🏻
This is a perfect review in my opinion! No better judge of a product than how useful it is without the manual. If you want the sound, and know you want the sound, you're gonna get it anyway. But for people who are unsure, this is a perfect product test! Props as always on the playing
Wow that zoom out on the first preset made me dizzy af, nice
Your points whilst relevant, this synth is still getting updated a bugs getting ironed out. Hopefully with your influence you can pass on these issues to the roland team.
Great synth.
how compares it with the "UDO Super 6" ?