Thank you so much. I currently own Sony A1 and used to own the Z9 but now also have a Canon R5 Mk II but haven’t owned an Olympus based system. Really appreciate the shots you captured. Take care.
A belated Happy New Year. I think your OM-1 image provides the perfect example of where the camera suffers compared with the other two, by which I mean, it’s essentially a photograph of brown bird in front of lighter brown reeds and there isn’t a great deal of contrast between the two compared with the other two images taken with the Nikon and Sony. I have been an Olympus user since 2007 and would be first to accept that if you want to expose the weakness of the system from a focus point of view, use it in relatively low light and relatively low contrast situations. I don’t question your personal findings but as is always the case in these matters it would be nice if a the same subject could be photographed in the same situation at the same settings. All this said, I would expect the more costly and brighter lenses if the full frame to give more consistent results, otherwise it wouldn’t make sense to spend the extra money on them or carry the heavier weight around? Take care.
Thanks for your comment and same to you 🙂 it also the reason i say in the start of the episode that a direct compare can´t be done because of so many factors (light, distance, backgrounds, time of year and etc.) 🙂 in my opinion all 3 are super systems and of course there are differences between FF and MFT. The FF systems separates the birds better from the backgrounds and that can be a matter of taste and this i have no problem with and also when you go MFT thats just how it is. Like i say its the AF where i really can see the big difference. I can´t speak for OM-1 MarkII as i haven´t tryed it,. Would love to try it out but haven´t had the chance yet.
These are all beautiful images! It really drives home the point that at this time the top cameras from all manufacturers produce outstanding images! I’m sure that the Canon R5 Mark II , and Canon R1 would rival these 3 systems, as well.
I do know what you mean, but i dont think its as bad as you say here 🙃 i also feel Nikon has a really nice look color wise compared to Sony. OM-1 i feel looks "flat" somehow compared to the full frame cameras. But i like all 3 systems and shoot with both OM-1 and Z9 ATM and are pleased with the results for what they are used for 🙂
Nice works Dennis and very well balanced examples. I do shoot OM1.1 and like Z9 images the most out of the three from your footage. People that shoot OM usually don't try this lens, but I have found using Penleica 200mm F2.8 lens to solve auto focus issue in low light. It works wonder comparing to 300mm F4 or 150-400mm F4.5 lenses. The 200mm F2.8 lens works really well when birds come close in particularly for shooting in a hide. Of course it is to be expected with faster lens. I cannot say which is better as I don't own other system. But I do shoot along with friend that do use OM, Z9, R5 and A1.
It is interesting that another fantastic bird photographer settled on the OM1ii instead of the Sony. He found the OM was quicker to detect, although there was also the odd occasion even with the later camera when it lost focus during a series (seems nowhere near as bad as the OM1). One of the things he hated was the amount of dust on the Sony sensor - OM seem to have some magic sauce. I was genuinely thinking of swopping but will stick with OM. With my age limiting weight, I can’t find a full frame system I can walk with that shoots 50fps with full autofocus zoom at up to 1000mm equivalent. Thanks for your video and shots.
You got it wrong Robert :) the A1 AF is WAY better than OM-1 by far :) the reason i went MFT was the size. I now shoot most with Nikon Z9 but use OM-1 from time to time when i just want to go light or for more static stuff like Cityscapes, travel etc. I love and recommend all the systems
@ Well I cannot argue with you as I haven’t used the A1. However, I do follow Mike Lane FRPS and he used both systems for some time before deciding, and he goes into detail on the autofocus, initial between the A1 and OM1 and then between the OM1i and the OM1ii. I really need the fantastic stabilisation of the OM because I cannot also carry a tripod - it’s good that Sony seems to have caught up with their latest camera. But again, I’m old with severe spinal arthritis, so need range and lightness. I shoot a few months ago next to an expert birder who has been making a documentary for three years on the Paradise Riflebird. I’m sure that his work will be far superior to mind. However, we had both had enough waiting and were packing to leave. The male immediately arrive and displayed to the female. He could not get his camera set up on the tripod in time and wouldn’t handhold hold the 600tc, so he missed the shot. I raised my camera and fired at 50fps at high ISO (dark rainforest) and had to process using DXO for noise reduction. I least I got the shot :-)
@@RobertOwen-p2e I to use the light setup when my back is at its worse (a lot of back problems) But i do agree that OM-1 v1 is a super nice camera and i also use it a lot :) Mike has a great channel and also helped me out private before i got the OM-1!
The Z8/9 is just made for wildlife, having made the switch from the a7iv and A1 the Nikon is just that bit better, all the cameras in this video produced stunning shot and you'd be happy with all of them.
Very nice Dennis all 3 cameras looked great, I have the Z9 and Z 600 f6.3 and the OM-1 Mark II with the 150-400 and honestly when I go out shooting I flip a coin to see which one I take 😂 😂 Love both systems;)
@DennisJacobsenWildlife yes I had version 1 first, Mark II is better at acquiring and is stickier how much better I'm not sure but you can see a difference.
i loved my olmpus when i owned the system they have improved in many ways the 150-400mm is arguably the best zoom amongst all systems ,the sony autofocus is what made me leave olympus which is why i now exclusive shoot sony ,but all cameras are pretty good now even the om1 is capable nikon and canon also have great autofocus ,but sony does not have the extent of wildlife lenses that canon or nikon has to offer ,but sonys sensors are a notch and better in most regards faster read out with global shutter , higher mp if required ,and better general iq over canon and nikon ,think the new a1.2 is better again with regards to high iso noise and dynamic range ,although all the images you took look great and your audience cares little for what system you use if results are good
Thanks for sharing Dennis - wonderful photos and an interesting comparison. I am into hiking and birding, so OM1 paired with a 300 pro, as a lightweight choice, is a great combo for that, even though I am tempted to look into what the others have to offer. I am thinking of going to Friskens hide myself. Do you have any tips for a visit?
It perfect for hiking and birds :) patience and slow movements and not to much noice either. The birds are VERY alert, especially if the Golden eagle visits! :)
0:02 What FW Version did you utilize with the OM1-1? If is not 1.7 you missed out on significatly better C-AF Performance, which is available for 1/2 year.
I am on 1.7 and it is better for sure :) and its not bad its just compared to the 2 others its way behind in precision and consistency for birds in flight! bird sitting there are no problems :)
Great video again, thank you. I have used all three systems and currently have the Z9 & 600mm Z f4 tc by Nikon. I had the A1 and the 600mm f4 by Sony and loved it. However, the built-in tc in the Nikon Z 600mm f4 is superior to attaching a tc to the Sony 600mm f4. It's not just about the changing the tc in and out, but it's the image quality at medium and longer distances...amazing on the Nikon lens. I do find the Nikon images just a tad less sharp with less resolution and slightly noisier than my old Sony set-up, and I do think that the Sony set-up had superior 'stickier' tracking autofocus. All great systems as you say. I did, however, find the OM-1 the worst performing of all three and would not recommend unless weight is the driver for the photographer. I have assumed all the images you have shown have been cleaned using DXO or similar? Images straight out of the OM system are not nice!
Thank you and i have the same findings as you! I went for Nikon because of the Z 400mm f/2.8 with TC for the versatility Sports/Wildlife :) yes all the photos was thru my usual workflow i do for stock photos so they are cleaned up in this episode :)
I would, and are using the Nikon Z9 for most serious stuff like sports photography and other payed jobs because of the quality and reliability :) I love using the Z 400mm f/2.8 with TC build in as its perfect for both sports and wildlife. I do use the OM-1 when i wanna go lightweight and for more static subjects :) its a really good system despite the AF are not on par with the 2 others :)
OM-1 mark II has no problem with autofocus, but still my a1 and a9 III performs better than om-1.I am keeping the OM System just it is much lighter than my a1+600mm f4.
hi Dennis fun and informative video. The image quality of the Sony and the Nikon are fractionally better, and you can see that. The photos taken with the Om-1 mk I are not bad. The AF of the Om-1 is clearly in need of a major software update, if that can be solved. It may also be that the mediocre AF of the Om-1 is due to the smaller sensor that collects less light than a full frame sensor. if so, they have an Om-system problem, and this camera may not be the best choice for wildlife photography. I have already seen several videos where the AF of the Om-1 failed. I'm curious how Om-system will solve this problem. if that is even possible.
The one photo towards the beginning from the A1 with the tight crop showed the best micro detail in this vid. I frequent a forum almost everyday & my impression is the Sony is better for this at longer distances & lower light. Not quite sure about Canon but they produce real high quality photos also. Nikon users produce some very nice photos also but not from as far as distances & in lower quality of light. Could be the editing , user's experience & wanting to post a photo that some might not post based on quality. For what it is worth, I still am shooting a Nikon D810 DSLR. I need sticky BIF AF & if going to upgrade the camera & lens to mirrorless also,,,, Depends on budget. On budget-If going with a tele-zoom in the 100-600mm zoom, rite now, Canon R5II with 100-500 or a good deal on a used Long EF lens. Prime lens new =Nikon Z8/9 with one of the PF 600/800 lenses when on sale. Money is no concern & the best keeper rate is most important, Sony A1/A1-2 with the 600 f4. Heck, even the Sony A7RV will keep focus using mechanical shutter but with a low buffer & shutter count. When a Green Heron is leaning off a fallen tree limb & stretching slowly just before that speedy lung into the water for a snack & jumps back up on to the limb. I want to catch that whole sequence of at least 10 photos tack sharp. Anyway, these choices are just my thoughts on seeing a lots & lots of post every week & watching quite a few vids. No you tube creator using multiple brands is going to go deep dive very detailed into the keeper rate scenario brands against each other (execpt Jared Polin & MAYBE the Northrups) because of the multi viewers watching & including the gear used vids get more views. =smart business. Heck, I can get some real nice photos with my D810/200-500 (& by no means is the D810 a wildlife camera) but a good percentage of them are at closer distances & in super nice light. Just that the keeper rate % is like 7 times lower than these new for action mirrorless systems.
@ I personally don't like the Sony color profile, and with my large hands I quickly get stuck between the lens and the camera grip of the Sony. Sony has some very nice wildlife lenses coming out. I shot with a Canon R3 for 3 years until 4 months ago. I really like the colors of the canon. In poor contrast conditions, the AF of the R3 also had a hard time, and I had to focus manually. The heavy weight was also something that often made me decide to leave the R3 at home on long walks. I have now been without a camera for 4 months now and am looking into a lighter camera system. If you often photograph from a photo hut or car, weight is not an issue, but if you like to walk, that is a different story. Good luck with your purchasing considerations.
Is anybody using the 1.7 (edited sorry about wrong number mistake) firmware update for the OM-1 v1 that was supposed to fix the autofocus problems on the v1?
@@theflyingdutchman7127 Thanks. I'm walker. sometimes I take my bag with tripod & other lenses because I'll shoot what ever I come across. But most times or should say more these days I;ll just go with the camera & long lens.
I use it and it is better but still could be more consistent and are far from the 2 other cameras in AF perfomance. But that said its not bad at all, its just not in tha same league as the other 2 :)
Thank you so much. I currently own Sony A1 and used to own the Z9 but now also have a Canon R5 Mk II but haven’t owned an Olympus based system. Really appreciate the shots you captured. Take care.
Thank you for for the comment 🙂 appreciated!
A belated Happy New Year. I think your OM-1 image provides the perfect example of where the camera suffers compared with the other two, by which I mean, it’s essentially a photograph of brown bird in front of lighter brown reeds and there isn’t a great deal of contrast between the two compared with the other two images taken with the Nikon and Sony. I have been an Olympus user since 2007 and would be first to accept that if you want to expose the weakness of the system from a focus point of view, use it in relatively low light and relatively low contrast situations. I don’t question your personal findings but as is always the case in these matters it would be nice if a the same subject could be photographed in the same situation at the same settings. All this said, I would expect the more costly and brighter lenses if the full frame to give more consistent results, otherwise it wouldn’t make sense to spend the extra money on them or carry the heavier weight around?
Take care.
Thanks for your comment and same to you 🙂 it also the reason i say in the start of the episode that a direct compare can´t be done because of so many factors (light, distance, backgrounds, time of year and etc.) 🙂 in my opinion all 3 are super systems and of course there are differences between FF and MFT. The FF systems separates the birds better from the backgrounds and that can be a matter of taste and this i have no problem with and also when you go MFT thats just how it is. Like i say its the AF where i really can see the big difference. I can´t speak for OM-1 MarkII as i haven´t tryed it,. Would love to try it out but haven´t had the chance yet.
These are all beautiful images! It really drives home the point that at this time the top cameras from all manufacturers produce outstanding images! I’m sure that the Canon R5 Mark II , and Canon R1 would rival these 3 systems, as well.
Superinteresting Dennis!
very interesting, and wonderful shots.
The ones with the best colors: Nikon, the one that looks like a phone photo: OM System, the one that lacks soul yet has perfect focus: Sony
I do know what you mean, but i dont think its as bad as you say here 🙃 i also feel Nikon has a really nice look color wise compared to Sony. OM-1 i feel looks "flat" somehow compared to the full frame cameras. But i like all 3 systems and shoot with both OM-1 and Z9 ATM and are pleased with the results for what they are used for 🙂
I'll just echo another comment: Very interesting and great shots. Thanks Dennis 🙂
Thank you :)
Great comments, cool comparison ... thx
Nice works Dennis and very well balanced examples. I do shoot OM1.1 and like Z9 images the most out of the three from your footage. People that shoot OM usually don't try this lens, but I have found using Penleica 200mm F2.8 lens to solve auto focus issue in low light. It works wonder comparing to 300mm F4 or 150-400mm F4.5 lenses. The 200mm F2.8 lens works really well when birds come close in particularly for shooting in a hide. Of course it is to be expected with faster lens. I cannot say which is better as I don't own other system. But I do shoot along with friend that do use OM, Z9, R5 and A1.
All great images Dennis, just wish I could afford any one of those super cameras !!! Look forward to more content in 2025. 👍
Thank you :)
It is interesting that another fantastic bird photographer settled on the OM1ii instead of the Sony. He found the OM was quicker to detect, although there was also the odd occasion even with the later camera when it lost focus during a series (seems nowhere near as bad as the OM1). One of the things he hated was the amount of dust on the Sony sensor - OM seem to have some magic sauce. I was genuinely thinking of swopping but will stick with OM. With my age limiting weight, I can’t find a full frame system I can walk with that shoots 50fps with full autofocus zoom at up to 1000mm equivalent. Thanks for your video and shots.
You got it wrong Robert :) the A1 AF is WAY better than OM-1 by far :) the reason i went MFT was the size. I now shoot most with Nikon Z9 but use OM-1 from time to time when i just want to go light or for more static stuff like Cityscapes, travel etc. I love and recommend all the systems
@ Well I cannot argue with you as I haven’t used the A1. However, I do follow Mike Lane FRPS and he used both systems for some time before deciding, and he goes into detail on the autofocus, initial between the A1 and OM1 and then between the OM1i and the OM1ii. I really need the fantastic stabilisation of the OM because I cannot also carry a tripod - it’s good that Sony seems to have caught up with their latest camera. But again, I’m old with severe spinal arthritis, so need range and lightness. I shoot a few months ago next to an expert birder who has been making a documentary for three years on the Paradise Riflebird. I’m sure that his work will be far superior to mind. However, we had both had enough waiting and were packing to leave. The male immediately arrive and displayed to the female. He could not get his camera set up on the tripod in time and wouldn’t handhold hold the 600tc, so he missed the shot. I raised my camera and fired at 50fps at high ISO (dark rainforest) and had to process using DXO for noise reduction. I least I got the shot :-)
@@RobertOwen-p2e I to use the light setup when my back is at its worse (a lot of back problems) But i do agree that OM-1 v1 is a super nice camera and i also use it a lot :) Mike has a great channel and also helped me out private before i got the OM-1!
The Z8/9 is just made for wildlife, having made the switch from the a7iv and A1 the Nikon is just that bit better, all the cameras in this video produced stunning shot and you'd be happy with all of them.
Very nice Dennis all 3 cameras looked great, I have the Z9 and Z 600 f6.3 and the OM-1 Mark II with the 150-400 and honestly when I go out shooting I flip a coin to see which one I take 😂 😂 Love both systems;)
@@HotGates great setups 😁 .. have you tried OM-1 v1? would love som opinions on the difference
@DennisJacobsenWildlife yes I had version 1 first, Mark II is better at acquiring and is stickier how much better I'm not sure but you can see a difference.
Ok thanks 😁
Très belle vidéo avec des photos magnifiques, il reste à essayer un apsc comme fuji par exemple.👍👍👍👍.
Bonne soirée.et encore bravo pour les photos.
Thank you 😁 i has Nikon D500 years back so i have used APS-C sensors before 📷 The episode from Gambia was shoor with D500 👍🏻😁
Nice shots and comparison video, Denis.
I envy you that you have such places in your country, where you can shot easy birds of prey.
Thanks :) yes it is the easy way to get close to them and there are divided opinions on photographing from a place like this :)
i loved my olmpus when i owned the system they have improved in many ways the 150-400mm is arguably the best zoom amongst all systems ,the sony autofocus is what made me leave olympus which is why i now exclusive shoot sony ,but all cameras are pretty good now even the om1 is capable nikon and canon also have great autofocus ,but sony does not have the extent of wildlife lenses that canon or nikon has to offer ,but sonys sensors are a notch and better in most regards faster read out with global shutter , higher mp if required ,and better general iq over canon and nikon ,think the new a1.2 is better again with regards to high iso noise and dynamic range ,although all the images you took look great and your audience cares little for what system you use if results are good
Very nice presentation. Thomas Jacobsen, Sitka, Alaska. Ancestors from Svendborg, Denmark.
Thanks Thomas :) hehe i have been in Svenborg a couple of times!
Thanks for sharing Dennis - wonderful photos and an interesting comparison. I am into hiking and birding, so OM1 paired with a 300 pro, as a lightweight choice, is a great combo for that, even though I am tempted to look into what the others have to offer. I am thinking of going to Friskens hide myself. Do you have any tips for a visit?
It perfect for hiking and birds :) patience and slow movements and not to much noice either. The birds are VERY alert, especially if the Golden eagle visits! :)
0:02 What FW Version did you utilize with the OM1-1? If is not 1.7 you missed out on significatly better C-AF Performance, which is available for 1/2 year.
I am on 1.7 and it is better for sure :) and its not bad its just compared to the 2 others its way behind in precision and consistency for birds in flight! bird sitting there are no problems :)
Great video again, thank you. I have used all three systems and currently have the Z9 & 600mm Z f4 tc by Nikon. I had the A1 and the 600mm f4 by Sony and loved it. However, the built-in tc in the Nikon Z 600mm f4 is superior to attaching a tc to the Sony 600mm f4. It's not just about the changing the tc in and out, but it's the image quality at medium and longer distances...amazing on the Nikon lens. I do find the Nikon images just a tad less sharp with less resolution and slightly noisier than my old Sony set-up, and I do think that the Sony set-up had superior 'stickier' tracking autofocus. All great systems as you say. I did, however, find the OM-1 the worst performing of all three and would not recommend unless weight is the driver for the photographer. I have assumed all the images you have shown have been cleaned using DXO or similar? Images straight out of the OM system are not nice!
Thank you and i have the same findings as you! I went for Nikon because of the Z 400mm f/2.8 with TC for the versatility Sports/Wildlife :) yes all the photos was thru my usual workflow i do for stock photos so they are cleaned up in this episode :)
Token me 15 minutes to find where did you go. Hope I can visit the same place this year.
Its a great hide 👍🏻
Great video Dennis, excellent comparison. If you had to choose to stay with only one system which one of these three would be?
I would, and are using the Nikon Z9 for most serious stuff like sports photography and other payed jobs because of the quality and reliability :) I love using the Z 400mm f/2.8 with TC build in as its perfect for both sports and wildlife. I do use the OM-1 when i wanna go lightweight and for more static subjects :) its a really good system despite the AF are not on par with the 2 others :)
OM-1 mark II has no problem with autofocus, but still my a1 and a9 III performs better than om-1.I am keeping the OM System just it is much lighter than my a1+600mm f4.
Sound good with the mark2 :) and exactly the same reason i have both systems :) thanks for your commend
You have to test the OM1II. The camera is better but not perfect.
Would love to try and test it but here in Copenhagen i can rent it and i am not gonna buy it :/ maybe i get the chance someday :)
hi Dennis
fun and informative video. The image quality of the Sony and the Nikon are fractionally better, and you can see that. The photos taken with the Om-1 mk I are not bad. The AF of the Om-1 is clearly in need of a major software update, if that can be solved. It may also be that the mediocre AF of the Om-1 is due to the smaller sensor that collects less light than a full frame sensor. if so, they have an Om-system problem, and this camera may not be the best choice for wildlife photography. I have already seen several videos where the AF of the Om-1 failed. I'm curious how Om-system will solve this problem. if that is even possible.
The one photo towards the beginning from the A1 with the tight crop showed the best micro detail in this vid. I frequent a forum almost everyday & my impression is the Sony is better for this at longer distances & lower light. Not quite sure about Canon but they produce real high quality photos also. Nikon users produce some very nice photos also but not from as far as distances & in lower quality of light. Could be the editing , user's experience & wanting to post a photo that some might not post based on quality. For what it is worth, I still am shooting a Nikon D810 DSLR. I need sticky BIF AF & if going to upgrade the camera & lens to mirrorless also,,,, Depends on budget. On budget-If going with a tele-zoom in the 100-600mm zoom, rite now, Canon R5II with 100-500 or a good deal on a used Long EF lens. Prime lens new =Nikon Z8/9 with one of the PF 600/800 lenses when on sale. Money is no concern & the best keeper rate is most important, Sony A1/A1-2 with the 600 f4. Heck, even the Sony A7RV will keep focus using mechanical shutter but with a low buffer & shutter count. When a Green Heron is leaning off a fallen tree limb & stretching slowly just before that speedy lung into the water for a snack & jumps back up on to the limb. I want to catch that whole sequence of at least 10 photos tack sharp. Anyway, these choices are just my thoughts on seeing a lots & lots of post every week & watching quite a few vids. No you tube creator using multiple brands is going to go deep dive very detailed into the keeper rate scenario brands against each other (execpt Jared Polin & MAYBE the Northrups) because of the multi viewers watching & including the gear used vids get more views. =smart business. Heck, I can get some real nice photos with my D810/200-500 (& by no means is the D810 a wildlife camera) but a good percentage of them are at closer distances & in super nice light. Just that the keeper rate % is like 7 times lower than these new for action mirrorless systems.
@ I personally don't like the Sony color profile, and with my large hands I quickly get stuck between the lens and the camera grip of the Sony. Sony has some very nice wildlife lenses coming out. I shot with a Canon R3 for 3 years until 4 months ago. I really like the colors of the canon. In poor contrast conditions, the AF of the R3 also had a hard time, and I had to focus manually. The heavy weight was also something that often made me decide to leave the R3 at home on long walks. I have now been without a camera for 4 months now and am looking into a lighter camera system. If you often photograph from a photo hut or car, weight is not an issue, but if you like to walk, that is a different story. Good luck with your purchasing considerations.
Is anybody using the 1.7 (edited sorry about wrong number mistake)
firmware update for the OM-1 v1 that was supposed to fix the autofocus problems on the v1?
@@theflyingdutchman7127 Thanks. I'm walker. sometimes I take my bag with tripod & other lenses because I'll shoot what ever I come across. But most times or should say more these days I;ll just go with the camera & long lens.
I use it and it is better but still could be more consistent and are far from the 2 other cameras in AF perfomance. But that said its not bad at all, its just not in tha same league as the other 2 :)
Die Deutsch Übersetzung ist eine Katastrophe
Spoken or subtitles?