Substitution and Elimination SN1 SN2 E1 E2 Practice Questions: Part 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor

    Please, like, share, and comment to help promote this video!
    If you would like to support the channel, you can do so by either donating or becoming a member:
    Donate: www.organicchemistrytutor.com/donate/
    Membership www.organicchemistrytutor.com/membership/

  • @a-bison
    @a-bison 2 месяца назад

    You're a hero for saving the life of my chemistry teacher 😆 subscribed!

  • @rstovern5673
    @rstovern5673 11 месяцев назад

    I appreciate your help sir

  • @ninaelih1122
    @ninaelih1122 26 дней назад

    Very helpful video! Just one question. Can two double bonds not form next to each other? In number 6, in regard to the elimination reactions part for the resonance structure on the left, why did we not consider the other beta hydrogen that was on the other side of the carbocation? Wouldn’t that have formed a more stable alkene right next to the other double bond? 24:26

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  26 дней назад

      Cumulated alkenes with two bonds next to each other C=C=C (also commonly referred to as allenes) are in fact less stable than the conjugated alkenes where you have an alternating C=C-C=C bonds.

  • @bonolosambo4933
    @bonolosambo4933 3 месяца назад +1

    Hello sir, for question 7, why don't we use the H on the dash attached to the wedged methyl group?

  • @camillefonseca5847
    @camillefonseca5847 18 дней назад

    Victor ily.

  • @rockubabe
    @rockubabe 11 месяцев назад

    Your handwriting is so aesthetic and pleasant to look at!

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  11 месяцев назад

      Well, I guess it's time to start a handwriting channel now! But seriously, thank you for your lovely comment.

  • @alejandrosantoyo3905
    @alejandrosantoyo3905 7 месяцев назад

    for the 2nd example would SN2 be the minor product?

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  7 месяцев назад

      A *very* minor product. Allylic systems give predominantly elimination products in reactions with bases.

  • @steveng724
    @steveng724 6 месяцев назад

    For number 7 why don't you use the implicit hydrogen that should already be wedged since it is next to a dashed methyl and is also above bromine. Isn't it perfect for E2?

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  6 месяцев назад

      And that gives you... what precisely? A double bond between the carbon and itself? 😉 We need a hydrogen on the *adjacent* carbon, not the one with the leaving group.

    • @steveng724
      @steveng724 6 месяцев назад

      @@VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor Actually I have just realized my own stupidity , I thought the cyclopentyl substituent was a dashed methyl.

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  6 месяцев назад

      @@steveng724 😳 I didn't even think about that, lol, I interpreted your comment as if you were referring to the wedged proton on the same carbon with bromine.

    • @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor
      @VictortheOrganicChemistryTutor  6 месяцев назад

      PS: it's a cycloPROPane (3 carbons) 😉