At the end at 1:29 I would expect the rest of the band to add in an extra chord on top of that chord overlaying it. Especially that of as heard in the beginning but this time the E chord, instead of the A chord.
The first time I’ve seen a tab or cover do the tapping exactly how it was in the studio version. Where he apparently messed that section up a little bit.
@@WhitePikminPro the song, Eruption, at 1:08-1:09 (for this tab above, it’s 1:12-1:13), he plays that specific ascending arpeggio 3 times instead of 4 times
So that's the mistake Eddie himself must've claimed on Wikipedia, eh? There is a description of this song on wikipedia with Eddie mentioning this... right?
@@archdukebigdogkoopa3821 Hell if I know about that, I just play the thing. You should have linked it if you expected us to know about it. Nonetheless it's a mistake that was pointed out for those of us who don't live on Wiki.
It’s amazing to hear, but musically, it’s extremely unstructured and chaotic. It looks super weird in musical form. Like just a bunch of sextuplets all over the place, with no real meter or anything. Like EVH threw a bunch of notes on a page anywhere. Brilliant in a way. But I personally prefer logical, organized, structured music like Randy Rhoads or Malmsteen.
i would really enjoy more videos like this, people underestimate the importance of such scrooling videos
Can't beat a good scrool
Oh nowwwww I get it
😂
This is the most accurate tabs i have ever seen
At the end at 1:29 I would expect the rest of the band to add in an extra chord on top of that chord overlaying it. Especially that of as heard in the beginning but this time the E chord, instead of the A chord.
Doug Steel brought me here ! Thank you so much .
You realize that this is almost completely wrong?!
The first time I’ve seen a tab or cover do the tapping exactly how it was in the studio version. Where he apparently messed that section up a little bit.
What do you mean?
@@WhitePikminPro the song, Eruption, at 1:08-1:09 (for this tab above, it’s 1:12-1:13), he plays that specific ascending arpeggio 3 times instead of 4 times
Oooooohhhhh!! I hate tab but I liked what I heard.
This is still wrong all over the place!
WOW. Do you have these tabs posted anywhere so we can print them?
If not the transcription could be written out from RUclips if you keep pausing it
The high F natural at 1:09 is wrong Should be an E like the next one.... No biggie Thanks for the Great Work
So that's the mistake Eddie himself must've claimed on Wikipedia, eh? There is a description of this song on wikipedia with Eddie mentioning this... right?
@@archdukebigdogkoopa3821 Hell if I know about that, I just play the thing. You should have linked it if you expected us to know about it. Nonetheless it's a mistake that was pointed out for those of us who don't live on Wiki.
I wonder if any guitarist seeing this sheet music before 1976 would understand what needed to be done technically in order for this to sound epic.
yeahhhhhhh , perfect transcription
アドリブでこれ弾くとか天才やん
I just like to imagine Beethoven. Reading this sheet music and being absolutely like. "What the fuck is happening!?!"
I noticed two notes are missing 😉
Weeepa!!!
😮
0:34
great job! is that a sampler? :O
Sounds like Artificial Intelligence version.
Do you think that the guy who invented sheet music thought about this?
Not many get Eddie's tone just right , but this is exactly the same tone.
Uhm no. For one, this is not even in the same tuning.
Edie Van Hallen can''t read this
Let's see AI create that. Eddie Van Halen is at GOAT level and AI is learning to tie its shoes.
Needed a computer to figure it out. 👎🏻
It’s amazing to hear, but musically, it’s extremely unstructured and chaotic. It looks super weird in musical form. Like just a bunch of sextuplets all over the place, with no real meter or anything. Like EVH threw a bunch of notes on a page anywhere. Brilliant in a way.
But I personally prefer logical, organized, structured music like Randy Rhoads or Malmsteen.