The short life of KATHERINE HOWARD | Henry VIII’s fifth wife | The most tragic Tudor Queen
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 июн 2024
- The life of Katherine Howard, fifth wife of Henry VIII, was short and tragic. A first cousin of Anne Boleyn, she was a minor member of the Howard family who was orphaned at a young age and largely raised at the home of her step-grandmother, Agnes, dowager Duchess of Norfolk. Whilst there she was involved with three men, her music teacher, Henry Manox, Agnes’s secretary Francis Dereham and a distant relation, Thomas Culpepper. Then, in 1540, she became a lady-in-waiting to Anne of Cleves and her life changed forever. Still just a teenager she caught the eye of the King and by that July she was his wife and the Queen of England. The pair seemed to get along well. Katherine was Henry’s ‘rose without a thorn’ and her presence appeared to reinvigorate him in the later part of his life. Her relationship with her step-daughter Mary (who was older than her) was tense at times, but she was kind to Prince Edward and Princess Elizabeth, even making little gifts of jewellery to the girl. Her queenship lasted less than 18 months however. In November 1541 her previous transgressions with Manox, Dereham and Culpepper came to light, as did accusations of adultery with Culpepper and all were arrested, along with Katherine’s lady-in-waiting, Jane Boleyn, Viscountess Rochford. The men were executed that December, while Katherine and Jane were found guilty by Act of Attainder and executed on 13 February 1542 at the Tower of London. They are presumed to have been buried in the Chapel of St Peter Ad Vincula, though Katherine’s bones could not be located by the Victorians. In today’s six wives documentary from History Calling, I take a deep dive into the life of the most tragic Tudor Queen, #KatherineHoward.
Patreon: / historycalling
Amazon storefront: www.amazon.com/shop/historyca...
Instagram: / historycalling
OTHER VIDEOS YOU MIGHT LIKE:
HOW OLD WAS KATHERINE HOWARD?
• How old was KATHERINE ...
WHAT DID KATHERINE HOWARD LOOK LIKE?
• WHAT DID KATHERINE HOW...
DEATH OF KATHERINE HOWARD AND JANE BOLEYN
• DEATH OF KATHERINE HOW...
WHAT HAPPENED TO KATHERINE HOWARD’S BODY?
• WHAT HAPPENED TO KATHE...
THE FACE OF JANE BOLEYN?
• The face of JANE BOLEY...
DIGGING UP ANNE BOLEYN AND OTHERS
• DIGGING UP ANNE BOLEYN...
SIX WIVES OF HENRY VIII PLAYLIST
• Six wives of Henry VIII
TUDOR MONARCHS’ PLAYLIST
• Tudor monarchs
DEATH, MURDER AND CORPSES’ PLAYLIST
• Death, murder and corpses
GEAR USED
DJI Drone: amzn.to/38h1vXr (UK LINK) OR amzn.to/39hROZm (US LINK)
Go-Pro Hero 10 camera: amzn.to/3EPIK9U (UK LINK) OR amzn.to/3rTWScL (US LINK)
GoPro 3-Way 2.0 (Tripod/Grip/Arm): amzn.to/37CdC1r (UK LINK) OR amzn.to/3vaVxjU (US LINK)
Memory Card: amzn.to/36QvcOQ (UK LINK) OR amzn.to/3KeLZZs (US LINK)
Microphone: amzn.to/3MFtoaK (UK LINK) OR amzn.to/3rYtjH8 (US LINK)
LEARN MORE
Want to watch/hear/read more about history (and a whole host of other topics)? Then you might benefit from a free Audible or Prime video trial. They are available from the following links:
AUDIBLE
amzn.to/44MvlMi
AUDIBLE PLUS & AUDIBLE PREMIUM PLUS
amzn.to/42rh3PF
PRIME VIDEO
amzn.to/3LW7ykg
BUY OR RENT:
The Tudors, season 1 amzn.to/3rFmveg (UK link) OR amzn.to/2VCwQ0j (US link)
The Tudors, season 2 amzn.to/3m64HIn (UK link) OR amzn.to/2VMPnHw (US link)
The Tudors, season 3 amzn.to/3wiwPwi (UK link) OR amzn.to/3BijsPB (US link)
The Tudors, season 4 amzn.to/3rNeggF (UK link) OR amzn.to/3z16S58 (US link)
Henry VIII and his Six Wives (2016 docu-drama) amzn.to/3jiCkag
Six Wives with Lucy Worsley (2016 docu-drama) amzn.to/3hd93vd (UK link) OR amzn.to/3wH2mr2 (US link)
LEARN MORE:
Gareth Russell, Young and Damned and Fair: The Life and Tragedy of Catherine Howard at the Court of Henry VIII (2017). amzn.to/3xldHhi (UK link) OR amzn.to/2VExTgg (US link)
Josephine Wilkinson, Katherine Howard: The Tragic Story of Henry VIII's Fifth Queen (London, 2016). amzn.to/3x7MxdO (UK link) OR amzn.to/3rbFuPj (US link)
David Starkey, Six Wives: the Queens of Henry VIII (Vintage, 2004) amzn.to/3k9uD4Z (UK link) OR amzn.to/3wImKIh (US link)
Antonia Fraser, The Six Wives Of Henry VIII (2nd edn, Phoenix, 2009) amzn.to/3atiEfi (UK link) OR amzn.to/36IqD5r (US link)
Eric Ives, The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn (Wiley-Blackwell, 2005) amzn.to/3xLivgr
Creative Commons licenses used see creativecommons.org/licenses/
NB: Links above may be affiliate links. This means if you make a purchase through one of these links, I earn a small commission. It in no way affects the price you pay.
#CatherineHoward #Tudorhistory
Do you think Katherine actually committed adultery? Let me know below and remember to check out my Patreon at www.patreon.com/historycalling and my Amazon storefront at www.amazon.com/shop/historycalling
I don't think Katherine committed adultery, but that letter she sent to Culpepper was a really bad idea. It gave the
impression that she was fooling around while married to Henry.
I do believe she committed adultery. She seemed to be a person that didn't have any idea of self control and past patterns had shown her she could have her fun as long as she wasn't caught.
If she didn’t have a physical affair with Culpepper while married to Henry then it was certainly an emotional one from the tone of her letter and meeting him in secret while on the Royal progress. She certainly did NOT deserve to be executed though. Henry could have annulled the marriage due to a pre contract with Dereham and sent her packing. He was a brutal king IMO.
I think from her past she had the affair. Culpepper was more her age Henry was an old man. It’s tragic but by his age he could not satisfy her romantically or physically. Wasn’t he ill while married to her?
It totally appears she was committing adultery.
I love that brief shining moment of her and Anne of Cleves dancing and being young women together.
Yes, it is nice to remember that Katherine had her happy moments too.
Agree. ❤❤❤
Francis Dereham strikes me as not only a bad character, but also a dumb one😭 who the hell blackmails someone when the blackmail involves them💀
I know. He really wasn't terribly bright. Once Katherine became Queen he should have gone away and stayed gone.
So true! The colorful description of him in the video made me chuckle because I was thinking the same exact things right before she called him an idiot.
Seems like many characters in novels are inspired by these real-life fools.
@@HistoryCallingIt’s even more baffling when you think of the amount of places, pensions or fees available. He had the perfect opportunity to get some cushy job somewhere far from Court that would have left him comfortably off for life, and instead he chose to draw as much attention to his connection to Katherine as was humanly possible. Right in the court of her husband. The all powerful King who was executing his own cousins left, right and centre. Idiocy doesn’t even begin to describe it.
If Derham had kept quiet, I think Catherine would not have died. I am thinking, she may have just been banished after the Culpepper affair.
I agree: it seems unreasonable to acquit Katherine of all responsibility in her relationship with Culpepper. Regardless of her largely unsupervised childhood, she had become an adult and had every reason to know her husband was not a forgiving man at the *best* of times.
Yes, I don't think it's right to act as though as though she had the mental age of a 10 year old. She was old enough at that stage to know better and the lengths she went to to hide her association with Culpepper indicate that she knew she was playing with fire.
She was a child.
@@teribelyea9340 21?
Fun fact: did you know, there was negotiations between Elizabeth and Ivan the terrible to get married ? Elizabeth shot down the idea because he reminded her of her father.
No, but it doesn't surprise me. Elizabeth would have been quite a catch in her time.
Henry and Ivan would have been friends.
That would be an interesting episode. "The Almost Marriages of Queen Elizabeth I".
Indeed. I don's think she really almost married anyone though. She was telling Leicester from the time that she was 8 that she was never getting hitched and I think she meant it, all the more so after the Thomas Seymour debacle.
@@HistoryCalling I remember one documentary where she was announced to be engaged after she had become queen. And not "married to England". Plus, it's an interesting title.
This poor kid. Her fate to me really underlines what a monster Henry VIII was. I think she's so sympathetic because it's very easy to imagine what she'd be like if she lived now - a happy party girl-type who'd find a better way through life than what actually happened to her.
Yes, by this point he was a monster I think. I just can't get past what he did to her, especially given what a serial adulterer he was. The hypocrisy is sickening. Of course she behaved poorly, but what do these stupid older men (then and now) expect when they get together with these young girls? It's so obvious the girls aren't there out of true love. It's a recipe for disaster.
@@HistoryCalling I realize I have a modern bias, but I can't help but see an abusive relationship between a teenage girl and an old creep who ended up murdering her. It's so gross.
Yes, I think that would be our take on it for sure. I also think he had AB judicially murdered too.
@@HistoryCalling Haha, this reminds me of an anecdote about the German philosopher Immanuel Kant. When an elderly gentleman told him about his engagement to a young girl, that man said rather humbly, that of course, at his age, children were not to be hoped for in the intended marriage. To which Kant replied 'Maybe not to be hoped for, but very much feared!'.
As to the hypocrisy - do you have any idea what the conception of female lust at the time was? I mean, AFAIK, the middle ages were convinced of women being the lustful (and thus prone to sinning) sex whereas in Victorian times, the opposite was thought to be true. So - when did it change? My point is: The hypocrisy would be a little less obvious, if men thought that women didn't have fun in bed anyway, so why shouldn't they be subject (pun intended) to any man no matter whether attractive or not.
"Henry was reduced to tears"
You know, I would have placed money on a bet that King Henry VIII didn't even know how to cry for his wives.
Bear in mind he was really crying for himself in this instance. I don't think he cried over KH or AB (maybe JS though).
That I would see him doing.
As to Katherine committing adultery, I would probably fall on the side that says yes. Only for the Culpepper affair. Even if they didn't have "relations" at that point, they really painted a picture of that being an intended event.
I will maintain, however, that her pre-marriage "indiscretions" shouldn't have been taken into account. I realize that's because of my much more modern take on a woman's right to dally as much as the menfolk, but I'll stubbornly stick to it :)
Yes, I don't think they should have counted either. It wasn't even a crime at the time, just heavily, heavily frowned upon. Bear in mind some of her dalliances were probably with Henry himself. He was such a hypocrite.
He was known for fits of what was then called “melancholy”. So certainly he did plenty of crying. That doesn’t mean he wasn’t weeping only for himself, though.
I’m sure he really did cry over her death. But probably because he felt he had been let down. Which he had, but it’s a pity he couldn’t have shown mercy to such a young woman. Perhaps he thought it would be perceived as weakness? Shocking to us today.
I always felt sorry for Katherine. Her youth, her flightiness, and foolishness, and her obvious lack of understanding what a precarious position she was in (particularly given what happened to her cousin) spelled certain doom. And, let us not forget the men around her who used and manipulated her, leading to her eventual downfall and death. Poor girl never had a chance.
Yes, she was certainly in over her head. While I don't think she was the total puppet that some have made her out to be, I also don't think she had the life experience to handle the situation she was thrust into and no one there to give her good advice.
💯 agree. Poor thing had no chance in that viper's nest of the Tudor court.
Yes, older and wiser people than her lost their heads there as well.
I agree. She's my favorite of Henry's wives
In defense of Katheryn, it does seem that she at least understood that Derham was trouble but he used her past to.blackmail his positing. During the rest of her stint as Queen, there are accounts of her making many presents of money and goods to him to try and keep him quiet. She was very upset with him at at least one meal(I like that was integrated into the Tudors), and probably more. She tried to keep a lid on him and her attempts would've probably worked with a differently tempered man. In the end, nothing she said to him mattered.
Great video, thank you. I can't believe she'd have been crazy enough to sleep with Culpepper knowing what happened to her cousin who didn't even do anything.
It is hard to believe I grant you, but even if she didn't do it, it seems like things were heading that way.
Much more interesting than any dramatization on Netflix or the like. Thank you!
Thank you very much :-)
I appreciate that you never sugarcoat your thoughts and opinions on these things. It's a rare thing in some spaces now, but it really gives an excellent perspective i may not have seen before. Thank you!
You're very welcome. It's a tricky line to toe sometimes, but I don't want to lie to people and I'm a believer in seeing history for what it really was and not what we want it to have been.
I agree. When history is whitewashed or only the positive aspects are promoted and none of the unpleasant and “messy” bits are ever mentioned we are doing no favors to the students and readers who are learning this material. When the true facts are revealed these people feel like they’ve been duped and no longer trust the history teachers and professors, the historians and the authors of histories and biographies which is so unfortunate. A good knowledge of history is important if we are to function as knowledgeable citizens who can make informed decisions about present issues and future ones by understanding the past.
Katherine deserved better.
You're really one of my favorite YT channels HC 😊
Thank you so much and yes, Katherine did deserve far better than she got.
NEW HISTORY CALLING ITS GONNA BE A GOOD DAY
Thanks Saoirse. I certainly hope so :-)
I use to think of Katherine as a total victim but The fact that Katherine choose to break off her relationships with Manox & Dareham tells me that she knew what she was doing & was not groomed or abused. Perhaps just too young, Didn’t have enough moral guidance & gravitated to the wrong type of men. Since these two seem to have been jerks. As for Culpeper, I think she wholeheartedly pursued this relationship & was in denial as to the consequences. As Queen, how could she not realize how she was held accountable to a higher standard? She obviously did not learn from what happened to her cousin Anne Boleyn. Such a tragic end to such a young person
Yes, I agree that by the time she was Queen she was really old enough to know better, especially given her Boleyn ties.
I really see her as an abused child. When that is what she was exposed to, it is difficult to make the right choices as an adult. So I still think she's the victim. She was groomed as a young child. You'd hope she would have been smart enough to not fall to Boyeln's fate and made better decisions, but I think from modern eyes, the abuse she suffered when she was too young to consent likely impacted her ability to make reasonable decisions.
It is a mercy when grooming/abuse victims manage to leave their abusers, and in no way does that choice mean they therefore "knew what they were doing" and weren't groomed or abused. Even more so when we're talking about somebody who'd barely hit puberty when the 'relationship' started. Tudor society wasn't enlightened enough to understand that, ours ought to be
I’d say Anne Boleyn’s rise and fall was more tragic. She faced a trial that was a kangaroo court facing horrible, incestuous, untrue charges and left behind a child whose fate looked very shaky. That that daughter turned into England’s greatest monarch was an irony that Anne probably never dared to imagine.
Greatest Police State in Europe at the time was under Eliz I.
Anne B was arrogant and was flagrant in her taking of Queen Katherines place. Karma
This has always seemed to me a “gathering storm”. From what I have read, she was ignored as a child, sent off to the Dowager Duchess as almost a last resort. She encountered young women with no morals and no true guidance emotionally, physically, or spiritually. Her fate, I believe, was sealed from that moment on. She became the center of that “storm”. I wonder if she was even able to mentally understand what was happening to her. It is a tragic ending to a young woman who had no hope of surviving court life and a naivety that took that life. As alway, HC, an excellent account of a tragic situation. Thank you so much. Have a great week! ☺️
Thanks Amy. Have a lovely week too. ☺
If she had encountered only young *women*, this would have been a quite different story. Let's not let Manox, Dereham, & Culpeper off the hook.
@@AG-iu9lv Absolutely agree
45 minutes?!? I m in heaven! ❤❤❤❤❤
Why thank you :-)
❤ I'm enjoying this even more on second viewing, HC. You mention "nuance" at one point and I think that's especially important as we have to deal with the blatant misogyny of Katherine's time (not that it's still not an issue). Katherine may not have been an "innocent" victim, but she was indeed a victim of the brutality of Henry and his sycophants. I'm glad you got around to a full biography of Katherine. Thanks for this, HC. Have a good week. 🙏🏼
Thanks Stephen. Yes, I can't believe I didn't already have a bio of her. They're generally tough to do for people who lived to be a respectable age because it takes such a long time to get through their lives, but for someone who died as young as KH I really should have gotten to her before now. Yes, nuance when looking at Katherine's life is indeed important. Have a lovely week too :-)
Thank you for highlighting Garreth Russell frequently in your video as his book 'Young and Damned and Fair' is in my opinion a must read - if you haven't read his recent book about Hampton Court Palace, that is a must read too :)
No problem. It's a good book and it was valuable to me in my research for this video, so I wanted to give credit where credit is due.
That title sounds Faulkneresque.
I love the description "an idiot who couldn't keep his trap shut"😂
It about sums him up 😊
@HistoryCalling it so does! Thank you so much for the extraordinary effort you put into these videos. I binge watch them. I hope you consider going into other Royal families in time...Scandinavians, Hanover, etc... warmest regards from Australia.
Great video! I think Katherine was so poorly brought up that it's hard to imagine her behaving in any other way than she did as a young adult. Marrying Henry was never going to end well for her, especially since it's more than a little apparent that she had even less intelligence than virtue. No, she didn't deserve her ultimate fate, but it would be to the astonishment of all if Henry _didn't_ have her executed. A sad story all around, and one that was probably recounted as a cautionary tale for quite some time.
Edited to add: Yes, I think she had adultery. It takes quite a lot of willpower to roll around in the sheets and then actually stop because you just remembered you're married to a King who would easily have you executed. I don't think Katherine had that kind of willpower.
Yes, she never really had a chance when you look at her background. If her family had been wiser they'd have come clean to Henry about her right away, but I think everyone was just a bit dazzled by the opportunity to have another Queen in the family.
It helps to remember that Katherine might not have known the full details about what had happened to Anne. She would have been a child at the time of Anne’s death, so unless someone told her the entire story, she might not have known.
I agree with you. The blind focus of all the participants on sex in an era where people could have their heads chopped off just for flirting (like Anne Boleyn) is rather shockingly reckless. I think the excuses often made for Katherine Howard comes from the fact that her behavior is a bit like a dizzy teenage girl.
I think the wisest thing would have been to have refused Henry VIII with some vague reference to "not being worthy" of him and "wishing to remain his loyal subject, a role she was more fitted for than queen" or something like that.
I’ve recently discovered your channel and am loving it! But, truth be told, you could read the phone book out loud and I’d tune in just to listen to your delicious accent. 😊
I have often wondered what exactly could compel a person to bless the king right before their execution. I understand that it was custom, and if one is guilty, fine. But Anne Boleyn did this also, and most historians agree that she was innocent of the charges against her. That would seem a hard pill to swallow. Although I guess in Anne's case, she may well have been thinking about the daughter she was leaving behind unprotected.
It was the custom as you say and just so expected and accepted that one wouldn't really have thought of doing otherwise. People wanted to make a 'good' death and not risk committing a fresh sin right at the last moment.
Well, Anne Boleyns case, she did it to try and protect Princess Elizabeth, I'd wager. And the rest of her family that he hadn't already executed.
In Katherines case I assume that it was because she knew she was guilty of cheating with Culpepper, and she truly was sorry. Furthermore, It occurred to me, perhaps, for both women, there could have been some hope in their hearts that Henry would not go through with the executions and thought that those praises of adoration would save not only their lives, but their positions?
I believe she was trying to protect her daughter Elizabeth and her remaining Boleyn relatives
I have a soft spot for her even if my first impression of her life was that she was very reckless and immature. I think is so sad that she never have someone to take care of her and teach her better about life in general in those times and then, the terrible bad luck of caught the eye of Henry VIII. If he wasn't attracted to her, she would have been a random lady in waiting and with a very random marriage and a relatively easy life for the times. Her story just makes me sad.
As someone who went to a boarding school, I can attest that the girls do have a kind of freedom normally not enjoyed by parental scrutiny. Mine was an American school in the UK. Basically it was nuts.
I've always found people's boarding school stories really interesting. I didn't go to one myself, so it's something I've never experienced and never will and I'm just always fascinated to hear what it was like. Why was yours nuts for instance?
@@HistoryCalling haha...we had young teachers who had no trouble "dating" some of us students. Never mind the drinking, house parties at the homes of absent parents of the few kids who were day students, kids who trekked to amsterdam not for the museums, a headmaster that was a fascist, but never really got any goods on us. It was a small school and we were feral. Though once some local comprehensive girls school kicked our butts while we were out hanging. English girls are the come to Jesus of absolute meanness.
Katherine Howard is my second favourite wife!! Can’t wait to listen to this! Thanks for the video ❤
Ah, now that begs the question; who's your favourite?
@@HistoryCallingAnne Boleyn who’s your favourite!?
Favourite to learn about is Anne B. Favourite to hang out with would probably be Catherine Parr.
@@HistoryCalling Anne of Cleves here. Certainly also not terribly well educated, but innately cleverer, and certainly some years older. But Katherine H was for sure not the brightest bulb in the chandelier...
I'm a Jane Seymour fan. I think she was good at controlling Henry's emotions and being the quiet, unassuming power behind the throne. I do have a soft spot for Katherine Howard. But I think Anne of Cleaves ultimately won and came off the best of all the wives.
I really wish we knew more about her😭 it’s not that weird that we don’t, she was, as you said, a minor member of the Howard family, and during her queenship I suppose people were more concerned with other matters, but still😭 it’s the history enthusiast (and Historian’s) nightmare
Same here. Of course it's not just her. We actually know surprisingly little about Jane Seymour and even Anne of Cleves as well.
Hi friend. I was extra history’s video series on wu Zetian.
@@DarthDread-oh2neHi. That seems interesting! She’s an interesting character, albeit ruthless as heck!
I always thought Henry's wives would not interest me. You have completely changed my mind. Thankyou.
Ah, once you get sucked into their stories there's no turning back ☺️
Could you do a video on Margaret Pole? I find her story sad but fascinating.
She's on my list. Bio videos are just a lot tougher to do for people who lived a long life as they take so long to research and put together. Even Katherine (a girl who barely made 20) still took 45 minutes to get through.
@HistoryCalling no rush at all. Always appreciate your videos! Gives me something to look forward to.
Yes, me too!!!😊
I also look forward to your eventual video about Margaret. It is, indeed, a tall order...but I know that your research and presentation will be impeccable.
She's been covered in historical fiction, but history lovers yearn for the facts as only you present them. Thanks for what you do!
Another wonderful video, as always. And, as always, beautiful images and video to go along with it. I enjoy the fact that you zhow them for long enough for people to take in all the detail and i must confess that i sort of play a "where's Waldo" with your images, looking for your watermark and writing on each image, declaring it was you who took the pictures! I love the fact that you claim your work to protect it from people who would steal it and that your wateemark and other writing are discrete enough to not distract from the images. It took me a bit to see the tiny letters in the french hoods or in the necklines of the clothes.
Loved it, as usual.
I think the exact same thing about the watermarks. I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers Where's Waldo (Wally in the UK). Honestly I'd rather not have to go to those lengths of course as it takes so long to watermark everything, but it's all I can do unfortunately :-( I do try to place them in somewhat unobtrusive places (like the hoods and necklines).
While I agree with you that Katherine Howard was not a brainless dupe of the men (other than her husband) with whom she had physical and/or emotional relationships with I personally think that she was also behaving like a typical teen. (Yes, I do know that the concept of being a teenager wasn’t something that was a part of Tudor/Renaissance society.) I think back on my own teenage years and am appalled by how reckless and willful I could be on occasion. Also, most teens don’t often think ahead about the consequences, including the possible unintended ones, that their words and actions might have on themselves and others.
I feel sorry for Katherine because she really didn’t have a responsible adult in her life to guide her, teach her the do’s and don’ts of Tudor society/court and just give her the adult attention, instruction and support that she so desperately needed! Her dad basically abandoned her; her mother died; and her step-grandmother was a careless guardian. So, while Katherine wasn’t forced into any of her “illicit” relationships and made unfortunate decisions regarding those relationships I do think that her story would have been very different if the adults responsible for her wellbeing had actually done their job and not have left her to her own devices.
PS. I have never understood why Jane Rochford behaved the way she did towards Katherine. Was she living vicariously through Katherine? She surely knew what a dangerous situation she and Katherine were in because her own husband had been executed by Henry VIII for alleged adultery and incest. Was she mentally ill? Did she enjoy “being at the top” at court so much that she became reckless which then blinded her to the very real and present danger that was part of being a member of Henry’s court? Would you recommend a good biography about her? I’ve already read Gareth Russell’s marvelous biography on Katherine. (My apologies for the long post!)
I struggle from today’s perspective to understand how Katherine knew everything that happened to her cousins and Henry’s other wives that she’d act so foolishly.
Was she sheltered from the gossip and was truly naive to the risk?! I find this hard to believe.
To be honest, I really think it's a case of carrying one's brains below the waist. Normally attributed to men, but in this case, it seems to have been different. I suppose she just liked men, had learnt she could get away with acting upon it and when the first thrill of being queen had worn off realized what her life as Henry's wife would be like in this regard (smelly, disgusting and certainly not too pleasing) and so decided to do what men did (having something cute on the side). Idiotic, of course, but feasible.
I think she knew about Mary and Anne but was just very foolhardy and didn't think she'd get caught. She was much younger and to be blunt, nowhere near as clever as AB in particular (and even AB ended up dead at Henry's hands).
Thanks for doing such a great job on all of your video’s, replying to so many comments and truly caring about your viewers. This makes such a difference. So much better than some channels where everyone is blatantly ignored. Hugz, Tree
You're very welcome. I try to get through the first 24 hours' worth of comments on a new video (though that is sometimes not possible if there are 100s and 100s of them). I wish I could do more, but I'd never be able to make new videos if I did :-)
Completely agree with you on this! History Calling is the best on RUclips ❤❤
What a sad story. Thank you for sharing all the unhappy details. I never realized how much documentation there actually was about her life. I remember Emily Blunt giving a very impressive performance as Katherine in one of the BBC productions, but that script called for Katherine to be shameless, even defiant in her affair with Culpepper. I don't know if it mattered to the king whether Katherine actually slept with Culpepper or just displayed a horrible lack of discretion in her flirtation with him, because all the revelations about her earlier relationships made this marriage look like a such a disastrous mistake.
The documents from after her arrest are really the goldmine here. Without them we'd know almost nothing about her before she arrived at court in late 1540.
I suspect the wound to his ego that his 'rose without a thorn' was running after a younger, fitter and less putrid man was even flirting with someone else would probably have been enough, tyrant that he was. Dereham was pretty brutally executed for not really having done anything illegal, just bruising to the King's ego
I am always moved by the biography of Katherine Howard. Thank you. I liked that you presented a different viewpoint on the validity of the victimization theory. I will have to ponder that a bit more before I make my own conclusion 😀
Thank you. Yes, you may well disagree with me of course (which is totally fine), but I don't think she was quite as weak and helpless as she is often portrayed.
I do think it plausible for a girl with as little life experience as she had, whose main dealings with men had been them being so completely taken with her (petulant & jealous Dereham, incapable of getting over her; lovestruck Henry, ignoring her complete lack of qualifications for queenhood and showering her in gifts and affection; Culpepper, risking life & limb just to be alone with her), to believe somehow that even if things came to light, she could avoid the axe, at the very least. I can also only imagine the desperation of a teenager experiencing the overwhelming feelings of young “love,” yet forced into a marriage with a foul-smelling, piggish middle-aged man old enough to be her grandfather. Her judgment was certainly clouded, but I have so much sympathy for her and feel she was failed by every guardian figure in her life. Cultural & moral differences of her time period aside, it’s hard not to view her and the tragedy of her life through a modern lens.
I absolutely agree that she is a total tragedy and not well cared for by all those in her life who should have been teaching and nurturing her. Perhaps she did have a feeling of invincibility, that she'd be able to get out of any trouble she got into. We'll never know :-(
I'm a little surprised the Howards didn't arrange a little "accident" for Dereham.
I'm guessing you aren't in agreement with the portrayal of Katherine in the musical "Six?"
I loved Six The Musical, but it wasn’t historically accurate, lol. I think my favorite line was Anne of Cleaves, “You mean I have to live in a big castle, by myself, without a man to tell me what to do?? Oh NO!” 😂
Hmm, maybe the Howards aren't as terrible as we think? Regarding Six, while it was a smidge too lenient on Katherine in my opinion, I actually found its portrayal of her incredibly poignant and it made me so sad. I have a review of the musical in my Six Wives of Henry VIII playlist if you ever want to check it out.
Lovely video ! Talking about if Catherine should have known better and should be treated the same way we treated Mary Tudor and her relationship with Charles Brandon, I half-agree. Yes, the two women were of the same age and had long passed the age of adolescence to make rational decisions and suffer the consequences. But one was a well-educated princess that had the time to experience adulthood and deal with important charges (that she was well-trained for since her birth), the other one was a neglected kid poorly watched over and educated that wasn't prepared to manage a queen's household (as you said)... I think the only way of changing if one should be more respected for her decisions than the other should depend on their level of maturity and the only way of knowing if Mary was more mature than Catherine would be to meet the ladies in person (which is not possible)... Moreover, I think we praise Mary Tudor for a second marriage because we love historic lovematches (especially when they happen on a person who, by birth, was forced to marry with questionning it) but we must also recognize that Mary's decision was a little bit rash: she knew she'd angered her brother in a way that would probably make her life miserable forever (perhaps she brushed it off) and the only reason why she would have wanted to rush her union with someone of her choosing would have been because she was more terrified of getting married to some crowned stranger (looks like she was genuinely traumatised by Louis XII of France) and genuinely believe she would gain independance and freedom from Brandon than from anyone else...
Well done! Thanks, HC.
You're very welcome ☺️
I really enjoy your videos. Thank you for all the work you put into this for us!
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SUCH A GENEROUS DONATION TO THE CHANNEL. I'm so glad you're enjoying the videos. More Tudor bios still to come!
Thanks for the video
Thanks Lynda. Enjoy and let me know if you think she committed adultery. :-)
Oh! A longer video! It’s probably gonna be a somber one, though, but thanks :)
Yes, it suddenly dawned on me that I'd never done a biography of Katherine and I thought that was a bit of an oversight. She had some happy times too, so it's not all doom and gloom.
@@HistoryCalling yes! her early queenship was actually good, she was doing a good job!
Hello HC. I told this guy you could sing my life as A highway.
Afraid I can't hold a tune :-)
Thanks, HC! A great summary.
You're welcome. I really should have already had a bio on her before now. It was a bit of an oversight. I have a few others coming too actually to plug some of the other gaps on my channel.
@@HistoryCalling It's me again, on another account. I just started Starkey's "Six Wives." His introduction is SO self-congratulatory, but he does such good work, I can forgive him that. lol
That's a very good book though, for an intro. to all six wives and his writing style is generally very readable, so do stick with it. I just picked up his Virtuous Prince this afternoon to check something and had a similar response to the first few pages, but the research will be solid I'm sure.
@@HistoryCallingStarkey sort of prides himself on being a prickly character. Seems he enjoys being perceived as a contrarian. He’s the type who would definitely be on Fox News a lot if he was American, if you know what I mean…
very interesting that Henry initiated the match - I always thought the Howards pushed the idea - as you say they should have stopped it then before the girl's history almost cost the Duke his head - too bad the Howards weren't very bright - ty HC
I suppose the Howards were so burnt by what happened to AB it might not have occurred to them to attempt to provide another Queen, esp. so soon after the Cleves' marriage.
@@HistoryCalling - Henry showed some interest and they hoped he'd never find out about her past I guess - the old Duke spent a few years in the Tower over it
It was incredibly short sighted. These sorts of things always come out. Far too many people knew what she'd got up to at the Dowager Duchess's for it to ever stay hidden.
@@HistoryCalling I don't understand how the king could not have known anything about her past if everyone else knew. Did he even hear rumours and dismiss them? It must have been the case that no one really cared about the situation (or the king himself) enough to give old Henry a "heads up", and were content to watch the show unfold. It is apparent that noone cared enough about Katherine to intervene on her behalf before it was too late. How sad.
@@maryannpshock955 The king was in a bit of a bubble. There were probably reasons that this tittle tattle might not have reached him. Maybe it was thought that the doings of a minor member of the Howard family were not important enough to share with him. Maybe even the Duke didn't really know the extent of Katherine's compromising behavior.
Superb as always HC, Katherine knew right from wrong apart from being nieve at times as young people tend to be, she did commit adultery, In her defence she was let down by some of the people she trusted, she certainly did not deserve her fate we all make mistakes she paid the full price for hers, thank you as always HC. 👍☺️
Thanks Simon. Yes, whatever her faults they weren't worthy of the death sentence. Henry was a serial adulterer, abusive parent and a double wife killer and he didn't get executed after all.
Catherine's story was so sad, culpeper and dereham definitely took advantage of her, as did henry viii
Yes, it's not gonna be a video with a happy ending unfortunately, but she did have some good times along the way too.
The source of all of the devastation and death during this time of Tudor history can only be leveled at one person :: KingHenryVIII. Everyone else is collateral damage. It was Henry’s impulsivity and poor judgment that caused him to marry a girl so much younger than him, and yet, when anything bad happens in his life, somebody must be blamed and killed, whether it be Cromwell. Anne B, or Catherine Howard.
Yes, Henry was terrible at taking responsibility for his own messes and also at being told her couldn't have something (like an annulment). There always had to be a scapegoat.
Katherine Howard's Father is my 16th Great Grandfather. Tracing my tree to the Tudor kings and beyond on a direct line is the most fascinating thing I've ever done. If you haven't already I highly recommend it.
⚘ Excellent! Your research is simply stunning. Thank you.
Thank you so much. I'm glad you liked it. More on the Tudors to come in the not too distant future! :-)
Very good thank you
Thanks Nathan. You're welcome 😊
Thank you.
Thank you so much for this video!
I truly admire how you point out that we shouldn't apply our modern standards and morals to earlier periods of human history, no matter what our views on certain aspects of life are nowadays.
To the subject of today's video, on the one hand I feel sorry for her, she was somewhat neglected by people in charge of her even by the standards of the period, so it's sad to see that these mistakes were part of her downfall, but on the other hand she made the very same mistake by being rather publicly involved in relationships with men again and again. While I doubt she could have avoided her fate, what IF she had just avoided Culpeper!
Yes, I feel very sorry for her too. While I think she bears some responsibility for her fate, she was still very young, frankly not terribly bright it would seem, not well educated in the ways of court and the world and certainly not deserving of her ultimate fate. As for what would have happened if Culpepper hadn't been in the picture, it's hard to say. She still had the problematic Dereham to deal with and she might have fond other suitors along the way.
Thanks!
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE VERY KIND DONATION CAROLYN. I hope you enjoyed the deep dive into the life of Katherine Howard.
I have to disagree with Gareth Russell on his argument that the relationship between Catherine and Manox was not abusive because adult men having romantic relationships with female children was normal for the time.
A lot of things have been normal during certain periods of time in all kinds of cultures. Including using 4yo children as cheap labour for dangerous jobs, claiming ownership of people, or forcing women to kill themselves when their husband died. That does not mean that as historians, we should not look back and point out that such things were abhorrent, abusive, or brutal. Perspective and proper scientific knowledge of how brains develop and how children develop allows us the knowledge and authority to point out that children having relationships with adults is abuse. Our standards are different, and we should use them to highlight both the good and the bad.
There's no reason to pretend otherwise unless we are open to not judging negatively the many other horrors that millions have gone through across history. By the argument of "it was normal at the time, their standards were different" we could give a pass to humanities biggest monstrosities (which honestly, should include by default the grooming and pedophilia across different eras), and that is not something we should ever do. Understanding that something was normal at a time does not mean we cannot point out that it is awful or abusive by our current standards.
Yes, I take your points. I don't think for one moment he supports those types of relationships, just to be clear, but it's made all the tricker to discuss KH's situation by the fact that we don't actually know the ages of those involved or exactly what happened. I think his point is just that Mannox wasn't holding Katherine down and forcing himself on her. Of course we understand that she wasn't old enough to give informed consent, but that wasn't how it was viewed at the time and they did think 12+ was old enough. I don't mean to imply that Russell isn't grossed out by this, as I'm sure he is.
Amazing account, much time & research required!💕
Thank you very much :-)
I'm halfway through her biography by Josephine Wilkinson, I feel truly sorry for her. It felt like she really didn't have a say in her own life
I haven't read all of that one, but Russell's one is pretty good. I did a review of it over on Patreon this week actually.
I've got that one on my bookshelf to read afterwards funnily enough, the Wilkinson one is very easy to read and calls quite a lot on Charles de Marillac for the information
Not a bad primary source at all. I use him too. :-)
Thank you
You're welcome and thank you for watching and commenting :-)
A child given in sacrifice to a sociopathic king, so her uncle could have even more power
It certainly wasn't a good match, that's for sure. Poor Katherine :-(
What a childish remark
@ryanborder189 How very self-aware if you. Your comment truly is immature and inane
I disagree that this comment is wrong. Many women were seen as property/possessions and in order for men to enhance within court, their women were used unscrupulously!
I do not believe she was sacrificed to Henry at all. I suspect Uncle Norfolk was operating in “oh s#!t mode” through this whole sad situation.
If Uncle Norfolk was going to throw another niece into Henry’s path intentionally she would have been specifically educated to be another Jane Seymour. He knew all too well what happened to his nieces when they displeased Henry and wouldn’t have risked a girl he hadn’t had direct control over for some time before hand to be certain of her behavior and obedience.
Excellent research video. Have you done one on Jane Rochford that I missed?
I do believe she committed adultery, especially as it was considered, at the time, that consummation, was the most important aspect of being married. The ceremony was secondary. I'm sure she knew just what she was doing. She had seen, or heard, of all that had been happening in the court. While she may have been Queen, she was still very young and Henry was a very fat man who may have been quite repugnant to her, especially in the marital bed. When I look at history, I try to leave all of my 20th & 21st Century attitudes out of it.
I do find it interesting that one of your longest videos goes to Henry's wife who had the shortest life and tenure. 😊
I know. I didn't mean for it to get this long and to be honest I thought I'd be able to cover such a short life in a briefer video too, but darn it, there's just so much to unpack with Katherine ☺ Thank goodness I didn't have to explain her date of birth and portraiture as well, or it would have gone on even longer. At least I already have videos on those topics.
@@HistoryCalling It was a very good video. Easily as good as any you've done.
This was a very comprehensive history of Catherine Howard and I thank you for your thorough research. I was always of the opinion that CH was a reckless and stupid girl, who plotted to conceive a child with Culpepper because the King was unable to perform. But having listened to your complete and detailed outline, I feel rather more sympathetic toward her.
I've always wondered what in heaven she could have been about, if not Treason with Culpepper and assumed he was as idiotic, undisciplined and reckless as she. But I wonder, could she have been contemplating release from the marriage, such as she'd seen with the most recent of Henry's other wives, Anne of Cleves? Anne had been their honored guest at Christmas, and it may have presented Catherine with a plan, one that would have given her status, income and perhaps the man of her dreams. If she could outlive Henry, or be rejected by him, and go quietly, as Anne had, she could have Culpepper. This could have been what they were doing closeted up together - hatching this plan. Clearly they were romantically involved, which itself would have been treason. But now I don't think she was foolish enough to try to conceive with him. I think perhaps she was coping with her marriage to a sickly, overweight, elderly man who left her too often to herself, but never free.
Perhaps she sought Culpepper's advice, as the only MAN she could trust with the knowledge that she wanted out of the marriage? She may have sought HIS advice either to understand why Henry couldn't, and what to do about it, what it meant about his health, or inclination. Had she failed in some way, or did Henry's desire for her fail? Did it mean he'd release her? She may never have encountered a man who didn't rise to the occasion. ;-)
Thanks Mary Lou. I'm glad yo found it helpful in understanding more about KH's life. I don't know if she would have thought of getting out of the marriage. Henry had annulled the unions with CoA and AC, it's true, but they were foreign princesses who would have been much harder to kill and they hadn't cheated on him. Her cousin Anne (who also hadn't cheated) lived just long enough to see her marriage annulled too and was then executed. I don't personally think KH and Culpepper were hoping for a happy ending unless Henry died first and they could have a Katherine of Valois/Owen Tudor kind of ending.
@@HistoryCalling True, and I didn't take into account that CoA, and AC were foreign princesses. But my point is that she may have entertained the idea that she could be widowed early, due to Henry's poor health, or released from the marriage based on NOT conceiving as (in her mind) AC apparently was. I'm not saying it was a good plan, but it is an alternative to her just thinking she could cheat on the King and possibly pass off any consequences as his offspring, which is what I always assumed. I think she was looking for advice from a male perspective, having been deprived of a father figure from a young age. Culpepper was close to the King, and knew things others, especially women wouldn't have known. I think Culpepper saw an opportunity to eventually marry the dowager Queen. For me, it makes more sense than simple lust in that high stakes game.
I still have hope that Ann of Cleaves gave Henry the smack down, I hope.
Sadly I don't think she did, but that's why she lived of course :-)
@@HistoryCalling That, or Henry was too embarrassed that a woman had slapped, or punched, his lights out.
In regard to the difference between Mary Tudor, Queen of France, and Katherine, I think the difference in perception of their respective agency is that Mary was doing nothing immoral in marrying Brandon, but Katherine was engaged in potential adultery, and betraying a husband renowned by that time for his brutality. (Did she not even notice the fate of Cromwell on her wedding day?)
The only limit on Mary's freedom to make a choice to marry Brandon was probably some anxiety on how her brother would respond to it, and perhaps especially worrying about how he might treat Brandon subsequently, as Henry was unlikely to execute his favorite sister, but he might have had Brandon killed. She relied on Henry's affection for her, and the promise (which Henry may not have really meant to abide by) that she could marry whom she wished after her French husband died. She was doing nothing to break a vow, or betray another. She took a risk which she had considered carefully. Her confidence was justified; the Brandons got off with a talking to and a truly enormous fine.
Katherine may have had agency, but it was used to follow a course of action that was immoral and foolish to the point of recklessness. I do think her relationship, however far it went, with Culpepper was consensual, but her use of agency here was so foolhardy that it seems to emerge from her poor education and upbringing, even if she was now clearly old enough and experienced enough to be making her own mistakes. She feels like a victim, even though she was following her own designs. Unlike her sister-in-law Mary, she had not a lifelong affectionate relationship with the king to rely on, and the breathtakingly bad judgment in conducting an illicit affair managed by an incompetent go-between seems to negate the value of her independent actions.
I think Mary's miscalculation was definitely far less foolhardy than Katherine's, for the reasons you state. Also worth remembering he hadn't yet executed Anne at the point of Mary and Brandon's marriage (or people like More) - once he'd executed a Queen, all bets were off. By Katherine's time there could be no doubt he was so vengeful
Hi, awesome live history video I enjoyed it. Katherine Parr is my favorite historical person in history. Who's your favorite historical person in the Tudor marachy? How are you doing? I'm doing well and so is my cat Benjamin. We have lots of warm weather in Ontario Canada. How is the weather where you are? Have a great day see you next video 😊
My favourite person in Tudor history is probably Elizabeth I (a boring answer I know, but she was brill). Glad to hear you're both keeping well. The weather here is rather underwhelming for the time of year unfortunately. :-(
Although my view of her completely matches the one expressed (and substantiated) here, I think she was the most ill-treated in "The Tudors", which I saw a few months ago: a leering portrait of a giggling nymphette, naked on a swing as the camera ogled her endlessly. (And I gallantly averted my eyes, I promise! [No, I didn't]). My basic objection to that series was not historical, but a filmmaking one- the decision to play it as a soap opera, with arms waving, a constant flow of glamour, steam, hysteria, and shirtlessness, and a general over-the-top acting style that kept me from ever quite believing it. The casting of "young hotties" in most of the roles sealed the matter. So while Katherine Howard might not have been purely the victim some prefer to see, her fate in that show was too uncomplicated in the opposite direction: not so much inaccurate as mean-spirited, I thought, right down to the final indignity: she wets herself on the scaffold. Poor Katherine.
The performance I struggled with the most was Henry: I've seen JRM be very good in something else, but he had no chance in this context, being horribly miscast, and probably horribly directed. The giddy, drunk-with-power-every-single-moment, over-seething eventually made me dread his entrances, grabbing people's heads and trying to create erotic tension with every single man in every single scene...I would not have done well in his court. Don't like people touching my head. Especially if they're Henry VIII.
I remember that exact scene and I thought it was totally gratuitous as well, as was the one of her the night before her death, naked and trying out the block (she did try out the block, but I'm sure she wasn't naked for it). The Tudors is fine for guilty pleasure entertainment, but I agree you don't want to go taking it literally. That said, it is more accurate than it needed to be and still a lot better than some other shows in terms of historical accuracy (cough, Reign, cough Bridgerton).
@@HistoryCalling Yeah, 'guilty pleasure' is a good description, and I certainly enjoyed it and hung in with it. And I don't mind soapy stuff at all, but I don't think the super-broad acting and so forth always mixes well with real people and their stories.
I would argue that a big part of the difference between Katherine Howard and Mary Tudor Brandon. Is that when Mary married Charles- is that she had to be pursuing the marriage, how easy would it have been for her to say no, to say my brother the king will be furious with both us. By Marrying Charles she was taking a risk. Because she wanted him.
Where as Katherine- how could she say no. He was the king. We see the same thing with Catherine Parr. They both were not invested in a marriage with Henry. Parr because she was already in love; Howard seemingly less averse to the match, but far too youthful in spirit, at least, to be queen.
It is not a matter of age. It is a matter of position and strength to be able to say No to Henry the 8th.
Let's just say I think you're going to find next week's video extra interesting :-)
Mary Tudor also had had the benefit of a good upbringing in the royal household, and the assurance of her birthright position as the daughter and sister of kings. Katherine did not have the same advantages, either of birth or education/ upbringing, so she was out of her depth pretty much her entire life. The only thing that might have saved her life would have been becoming pregnant immediately and giving birth to a healthy son 9 months after the wedding, although not if the baby’s paternity was called into question.
Kathryn's family and associates did not throw her under the bus - they threw her under an entire FLEET of buses. What she was the most guilty of is appallingly poor judgment. While yes, some examples from the sources indicate she was old enough to know right from wrong, there is an old Southern saying that covers her - "Old enough to know better, too young to resist." It is getting easier to see that she was not "groomed" as we think of it today, but both Henry Mannox and Francis Dereham did take advantage of Kathryn's naivete and poor judgment.
I think Kathryn did not take the "out" that she was precontracted to Dereham; that would have meant a sharp drop in station, status and wealth, and having a jealous, loud mouthed idiot in charge of her life, as she would have been considered Dereham's "property" as his wife.
I am surprised the Howards did not have Francis Dereham silenced. It would not have been at all out of character for Thomas Howard to have somehow arranged an "accident." It is also surprising that Henry Mannox did not lose his head.
Yes, she was very poorly cared for and advised. The dowager duchess obviously shouldn't have had the charge of all those young ladies. She wasn't up to the job of looking after them properly. I don't think Katherine even realised that a marriage to Dereham might have been her 'out'. Annoying as he was, better to be alive and married to him than executed. Mannox was very lucky. I'm amazed he lived to tell the tale as well.
@@HistoryCalling Do you think Henry would have spared her if she could have proved pre-contract? My own opinion is that he would have found some other means of judicially murdering her. Her presence was too painful for him to tolerate, I think.
I agree with others that Mary Tudor was cut from different cloth than KH. Mary was daughter and sister of kings, and would have had a very different upbringing than KH. She would certainly have had a better idea of actions and consequences for royal ladies, and it strikes me Mary was brighter than her sister-in-law. Katherine may well have had not as much idea of how thin the ice she was skating on; but as you say, in the Culpeper situation, she DID know what she was doing was wrong. And she chose to do it anyway - she's not a blameless victim here.
On a tangential point, I find it interesting that it was her situation that introduced Royal Assent to bills not having to be provided by the monarch in person -- but nearly always these days by commission appointed for the task. Henry couldn't face assenting to the Bill of Attainder, so a commission did it for him. Anne Boleyn was condemned by a legal trial (rigged though it was) so the King didn't actually have to pronounce the death sentence. Then again, he would have had to sign the death warrant, so I'm not clear why he got so picky in KH's case
I wonder if Henry didn't want a trial because in this case, he knew he'd been cuckolded (or heavily suspected it) and didn't want to be embarrassed? In Anne's case, he knew she'd been faithful and he knew that everyone else knew it too.
@@HistoryCalling If memory serves, George Boleyn read testimony at his trial that Henry was impotent. Henry may not have expected that perhaps, and may not have cared to repeat the experience, with the added revelation that he'd probably been cuckolded.
Have you ever done a video about Anne Boleyn's coronation? Im re-watching The Tudors (I know the accuracy is awful, but I still absolutely love this show lol), and they just showed Anne's coronation, and I'm curious if that's what really happened. Reallly, I'd love a video on her, & Catherine of Aragons coronations! (If I recall correctly, those 2 were the only ones offically crowned as queen.. but I could be wrong). Long story long, I'd love some coronation vids!! Haha.
Thanks.
You're welcome ☺️
I love the portrayal
Of her on Tudors
Great video ❤️ katherine howard and Anne boleyn are my favourite tudor Queens.
It's such a shame we don't have any record of them meeting. Had Anne lived another few years they probably would have.
@@HistoryCalling oh yes most likely katherine would have served in Anne's household as even bess Holland (Thomas Howard's mistress) was placed there.
Yes, I think that's a real possibility too. Hmm, I wonder if Henry would have gone after her if she'd been serving Anne? Probably actually. He had an affair with Madge Shelton and she was Anne's (more distant) cousin too.
@@HistoryCalling most likely he would have. I wonder if she would been coached to reject the King's advances like Jane Seymour or told to give In to him like madge had done.
I wonder what Derehams reaction would have been if she were to sleep with the king?
This is the best presentation about Katherine Howard that I have ever seen. Her life was short and tragic and she did not deserve her end, yet she was incredibly stupid and careless to say the least. Not to mention that she was Anne Boleyn's cousin and Anne had been executed on fake charges of adultery which bolstered the charge of treason.
Katherine Howard's story embodies sexual beliefs and mores that have persisted until the last few decades. Women pay the price of any indiscretion. Women who make mistakes will be judged harshly and carry all blame. This sort of thinking was still common in my young life even though that was in the "swinging 60's".
Not only did society judge such females but other women also judged. It was part of society's hidden skeleton intended to support stable marriages and prevent unwanted pregnancies. Within this framework, Katherine Howard was a stupid ****. [That 4-letter word begins with SL. We don't talk that way anymore.] I have held my own behaviour to these standards and had I done otherwise, I would have felt shame and judged myself just as harshly.
When Katherine's first indiscretions were known, her grandmother struck her in the face. This should have given Katherine an inkling of how the world worked, that female victims would be blamed and males would escape. [Tragically, until recently, when young girls tried to get help from family members for abuses, those girls would most likely be treated the same. For instance a mother would likely slap her daughter and tell her to clean up her dirty mind!]
Chastity was much more important in Katherine's day. She should have known that. Her fortunes and that of her family depended upon her behaviour.
I do not believe Katherine was physically unfaithful to Henry, but the appearance of unfaithfulness plus her background led to the end.
Amazingly, two of the accused men seemed rather proud of having planned to "know the queen carnally". Even if they were tortured, it appears they had a general disdain for Henry. I think that is interesting.
I agree with you HC. I don't and never have believed that Katherine was abused or groomed. She was an instigator and fully complicit in her actions. That said, I don't think in any way that she deserved her terrible fate. Oh that she'd never married the despicable Henry Vlll. Poor girl.
Yes, she had such a short and tragic life. Really all she seems to have wanted was to have a nice time and for the others around her to enjoy themselves too. Hardly worthy of a death sentence :-(
Queen Kathryn truly so upsetting. She was likely the least politically motivated Queen and was & could of been not just the Queen Henry needed, but the court. She was graceful & joyful (she had her moments) but I think she had it in her to be a positive influence for England.
Yes, I don't think she was really interested in politics either and a neutral Queen would have been valuable to Henry at that point. She's basically the English version of a Greek tragedy. :-(
@@HistoryCalling 💯
22:30 History Calling, at the risk of Too Much Information (but among friends), I think we all get a little 'ding' every time you upload!
Haha! Thank you ☺️
I am a specialist in Tudor poetics, rhetoric, theology, and history at university, and agree with you absolutely that at least where the Culpepper affair is concerned, Queen Katherine Howard 1) had had enough exposure to and experience with the always turbulent, muddy waters of Tudor court politics (particularly where King Henry VIII’s intimate/sex life was concerned), and regardless of the Dowager Duchess Agnes of Norfolk’s neglect of Katherine’s “formation” (in the French sense of both “education” *and* training in the sometimes rewarding intricacies and possible pitfalls of royal court intrigue), by the time of The 1541 Royal Progress of Henry and Katherine, she knew very well what a seriously dangerous course it was that she was charting with Culpepper, and was most certainly no ingénue in the matter.
I am sick to death of reading one feminist “Tudor biographer/historian” after another insisting that in the affair with Culpepper and in her *choosing* to give Dereham a position at court as her private secretary “she had no more agency than any other early modern woman would have had.”That is poppycock. *Many* early modern women--especially widows, but by no means widows exclusively--exercised considerable agency and at times, even power. Margaret Beaufort, Countess of Richmond and Derby and eventually Queen Mother to King Henry VII, for instance, negotiated her way with great agency through many highs and lows during the drawn-out fifteenth-century English dynastic civil war between the rival royal houses of Lancaster and York-The Wars of the Roses-to eventually have the power to work with *another* powerful 15th-century woman, Queen Elizabeth Woodville, wife of the dead Yorkist King Edward IV, to **have the last, utterly brutal and ruthless Yorkist King, RICHARD III, overthrown and killed, so that her son--Henry of Richmond, the last claimant with a Lancastrian royal pedigree--could become King Henry VII; found the Tudor Dynasty; end the Wars of the Roses by marrying Queen Elizabeth Woodville’s daughter, Elizabeth of York, the White Rose and the immensely influential Mother of Henry VIII himself.** Marie de Guise, Regent of Scotland for her infant daughter, Mary Queen of Scots and Queen Consort of France, was an able ruler (far more capable than her daughter, as things turned out, and every bit a match for Henry VIII in the sixteenth-century political games of diplomacy and even warfare, gaining a battlefield victory over Henry VII’s English forces with her Franco-Scottish army in the successful siege of Broughty Castle. These are merely three of the *many* women with a great deal of agency in the sixteenth century.
The sad fact is that ** IF KATHERINE HAD SIMPLY ACTED WITH PRUDENCE, PATIENCE, AND RESTRAINT, all that she yearned for could have been hers within less than six years, for Henry VIII died in January 1547. In the meantime, the old and seriously ailing King was as besotted with his “rose without a thorn” (Katherine) as ever, and would have continued to indulge her undignified and quite unconcealed, avaricious desire for more and more expensive fashionable dresses and rarer and rarer beautiful gemstone necklaces and rings. Katherine Howard was *many* fascinating and also *many* not-so-admirable things. Tragically for *her* sake, “patient” and “restrained” were *not* two of the things Katherine was, especially where her desire was concerned.
And so in the end, *she* became the primary author of the gruesome story of her fall.
Remember Emily blunt playing her once when she was very young. Tv ray Winston as henry
I sure do. I actually really liked that version of the story. Emilia Fox was in there too as Jane Seymour. It was a really great cast. Emily had me crying when Katherine died of course. It wasn't historically accurate the way her death was portrayed, but boy was it a tear jerker.
@@HistoryCalling agreed
@@HistoryCalling Not to mention Helena Bonham Carter as Anne Boleyn. Pretty big cast all round.
I look at Katherines actions as in Duality as that of
A Spoiled Child / A Lost Child 😢
Wow great video @historycalling I felt bad for the poor thing ...
Thanks Wendy. Yes, me too. She and Lady Jane Grey are the greatest tragedies of this family I think.
Excellent summary! Thank you for your work.
Thanks Helen or Gary (or maybe even both!) :-)
I think she probably did commit adultery with Culpepper, given neither she nor he had a reputation for reigning in their desires, and given Jane Boleyn was arranging secret meetings between them.
Her story always strikes me as terribly sad. She was no schemer like Anne Boleyn or Jane Seymour, both of whom carefully orchestrated their seduction of Henry. She was no political animal like Katherine of Aragon or Anne of Cleves, one of whom used her political influence to cling on for years and the other of whom had just enough influence to arrange her own safety while also being happy to surrender to comfortable defeat. And she didn’t have the education and intelligence of Katherine Parr, who was the only one of Henry’s wives to walk herself into a death warrant and then talk her way out of it, and who may have been in love with another man while Henry courted and wed her, but who gave no sign of it until Henry was dead.
I think Katherine Howard was smarter and less shallow than most people give her credit for given what few records we have from her brief time as Queen, but she was a very ordinary girl who was thrust to the forefront of a particularly vicious court, she had let her heart rule her head from her early days, and she soon got in well over her head, with her family’s enemies taking full advantage of that. She was exploited by people who should have protected her. She was thrown into a position she was utterly unsuited for but couldn’t say no to. She had a past she couldn’t cover up. She fell in love and couldn’t resist.
She seems far more wronged than wrong.
Yes, it's a pity she didn't play the long game as Catherine Parr did and wait for Henry to die before going after the man she really wanted. She still would have only been in her mid 20s.
That is well said, especially about her being an ordinary girl, which is what Gareth Russell thinks too, and why he thinks the story of her fall is so particularly pitiful and sad.
My favourite is Catherine Howard after of Catherine of Aragon
I wonder how she really felt about Henry and what the relationship was like for Catherine. Given Henry's physical condition and age it may have been loathsome to her all the while having to pretend it wasnt because he was the king. This is why she may have got involved with Culpepper for support and strength to cope with what shed got herself into. It must have been a very lonely and frightening place for Catherine, living in fear of the past catching up with her and living up to Henry's expectations.
Life was very tough in those days, which leads me to think that although Katherine was pretty uneducated, her survival instincts must have kicked in before she married Henry. She may not have had any say in whether she married Henry, but she would have known that Henry was a tyrrant at this point. She displayed terrible judgement by surrounding herself with people from her unorthodox past, rather than learned people she must have been recommended. To have had anything to do with another man after her marriage, is tantamount to suicide. Her own cousin should have been the yardstick for her behaviour. Stupid? Most definitely. Unfaithful? Possibly. In a time where just a whisper could seal your fate, she was unbelieveably irresponsible. Did she deserve to die? Not really. Should she have been imprisoned (for own good) or sent to a nunnery? Would have been a better outcome for her. Thanks HC. She isn't my fave, I'm afraid. 😃
Yes, she wasn't the smartest dear love her and didn't have good advice. I agree that nothing she did merited death though. Nunneries wouldn't have been an option anymore by this point, but an annulment and being sent back to her family in disgrace would have been a kinder option. That just wasn't Henry though :-(
@@HistoryCalling Her continued existence would have been a perpetual reminder of what must have seemed to his outsized ego a terrible humiliation.
I read an interesting series of fiction books, called The Marquess House. It basically lays out an alternate timeline in which Catherine escaped Henry and went on to live a full life. And even though I know it didn’t happen, it made me feel a little better about her horribly short life.
"Word I can't say or I'll get domonetised" 🤣🤣🤣
While we’ll likely never know if they did, the possibility that Henry’s second and fifth wives met, seeing as they were cousins, is tantalising
It appears that they didn't, no doubt because of Katherine's youth and the sheer size of that family, but I was just saying to another commenter that it's a shame we have no record of such a meeting. It would have been interesting to see what they made of each other.
I never knew that Kathryn's life was so tragic. Sounds to me like she was used and abused by more than just the men in her life. Such a sad life. I think she may have felt trapped by Henry when he decided to marry her. There was no graceful way out. Then when she was promised mercy she told all and later tried to paint herself a victim probably hoping for Henry to offer her a divorce as he had her predecessor, Anne of Cleves. Instead it sounds like at this point in his life he had become quite vicious and had no intentions of offering her mercy. What is more heart breaking was that so many people turned against her and used her downfall to further thier own gain. I'm fully aware that she in a way was responsible for her own downfall by having an affair while queen, but I feel her punishment was far more harsh than the crime called for.
On a side note something you said sbout Kathryn escaping and running to try to find Henry to beg for mercy reminded me of something i heard in my youth about her cousin Anne Boleyn. I heard that after her miscarriage that she began to lose her sanity and that sometimes she would have a mad laugh. Probably something that would be considered today as a nervous laugh due to the stress upon her to produce a male heir. Do you have any recommendations for where I can either confirm or deny this? Thanks
Hmm, I don't remember ever hearing the story about Anne (other than sometimes she would laugh hysterically in the Tower in her final days). You could check Eric Ives' bio of her. If it's not mentioned there then I very much doubt it happened.
@@HistoryCalling thanks I will look.
Good evening to history calling from Bea 🇬🇧
Hi Bea and welcome back :-)
Do you know why Lady Rochford agreed to help Katherine meet up with Culpepper? After her experience with Anne and George?
No one has ever been able to give a satisfactory answer to that question. Jane Boleyn is a bit of a mystery as her actions were so reckless and stupid and as you say, she really ought to have known better.
Katherine Howard in her early teenage years was a bit precocious girl. Agnes and any other family member should’ve done a better job in protecting her. She made a lot of mistakes as a queen by putting herself in a precarious situations. I don’t know if she had an affair with Culpepper. However, that letter made it seem that they were very close in my opinion. Katherine Howard wasn’t blameless, but I still felt bad for her. Thank you for the history lesson.😊
Yes, same here. She was almost left to raise herself and it doesn't surprise me that things went so awry.
It would be appreciated if you could do a future video on Hannah Lightfoot, the Fair Quakeress. For some reason she has popped up in several things I have read or watched lately. We all know you use primary sources and it would be very interesting for know if Hannah was just a lovely Georgian romance story or if she actually existed and to what extent her relationship evolved. Thank you
Hmm, I haven't heard of her but I shall Google :-)
She existed, but the story that George III married her is poppycock. Or at least a Hannah Lightfoot, Quakeress, existed, in what became the US. She married a man whose name happened to be George Rex, and I think the story sprang up because of his last name. Who George III was attracted to, and who might deserve a video, was Lady Sarah Lennox, one of the famous Lennox sisters, daughters of the Duke of Lennox, a grandson of Charles II. The match was rejected by George's family and he married Queen Charlotte instead.
Hannah and George Rex are ancestor's of my son's wife. Her family believes the King George story. If I told them what I thought, I don't think I would be welcome at family gatherings.
The most tragic was henrys first wife Katherine. To be set aside as old and not really married, after 19 years is very sad and any man who does that is horrible. K H knew what H8 was like and knew his propensity for ridding himself of wives. She also knew H8 was married and she replaced his wife Anne of Cleves. She was young but more than that she was stupid.
What I find odd is Jane Boleyn assisting Katherine to meet with Culpepper. Jane knew better than anyone there how easily Henry could have a queen killed for any hint of adultery, even if she was innocent. So, did Katherine threaten her into helping with the Culpepper meetings?
No one has ever been able to satisfactorily explain what on earth Jane Boleyn was thinking because as you say, her actions just make no sense. My best guess is that she was an idiot.
@@HistoryCalling Gareth Russell thinks she was a natural conspirator, and not very good at it, sadly for herself and Katherine.
Wow. I did not know her own sister turned against her too or that she even had a sister, that breaks my heart. I knew her uncle wanted her dead tho, how hateful. I enjoyed this video very much, I have always felt so bad for her. I concur with what you said how her actions did not warrant her death but I do think it wasn’t smart of her to carry on with Culpepper like she did. I absolutely think they did have an affair, I feel the letter is proof. If they hadn’t acted on their indiscretion yet I believe they fully intended to just as culpepper said. Oh and how dumb Dereham was, he didn’t deserve his fate either but he did have it coming. I feel she may not have had a true friend as they all wanted something from her! Oh gosh I could go on and on so I’ll just end it here lol! Great video!
Thank you for the video. I have a keen interest in Katherine Howard, since she is my 1st cousin 14 times removed. I 'm descended from her uncle, Thomas Howard the Duke of Norfolk. There had always been some rumors in the Howard family that Katherine's body was exhumed after Henry's death and the body was moved to one the Howard's Estates and placed in an unmarked grave, due to the scandal that she brought upon the family. These are only rumors and there is no concrete evidence for this.
Well there is the fact that no body was found when the Victorians dug up the spot where they expected her to be :-) Seriously though, I doubt she was exhumed and moved (why take her and not Anne Boleyn for instance and how would one get in and out of the Tower without being caught), but it's a nicer story than being left to turn to dust under the floor of the Chapel of St Peter Ad Vincula. I have a video on her missing remains, if you haven't seen it yet.
Y'know, based on absolutely nothing beyond my own scepticism, I've never believed that KH actually penned that letter to Culpeper. The clandestine meetings were risky enough, but leaving physical evidence making reference to them goes beyond risk into pure stupidity. Moreover, the King's groom of the stool keeping said letter in his possession to be found? These weren't stupid people, but such actions definitely would have been. Unless someone else wrote it...
...or maybe I just love a conspiracy theory 🤪
We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. No one at the time ever doubted it was Katherine's letter (and they would have had other handwriting samples to compare it to) and I don't think there's even any record of her or Culpepper denying it. As for their intelligence, unfortunately I think they were that stupid and that their other actions prove it. I still don't think they deserved death though.
Catherine must have been charismatic.
Yes, I think she must have had certain je ne sais quoi too.