"Can I get a coffee?" "No, we don't offer coffee. But I can get you a re-hydrated bean-derived caffeinated beverage, usually served hot. Do you want that black or black-adjacent?"
The second speaker's brief mention of micro aggression: She basically nails it - that anyone anywhere at any time and for any reason can declare themselves to have been aggressed upon by a person who may or may not have been aware of the impact. This is a completely subjective response. Let me be clear. A thing that no-one appears to care about or suggest might offer greater clarity, could it or should it be examined in the light of objectively observed facts? What gets lost in all of this mess, or appears to get lost in it - is the fact that the whole concept of a micro aggression (other than the weird fact that it seems to have replaced "macro" aggressions that have apparently become quite scarce) is that it is an easily and readily useful weaponized quick hit on anyone that the accuser does not like. Again, for any reason, at any time in any place, and upon a mere whim. We are such babies it seems, to think that this does not happen. Of course it happens. A reasonable socially adept and responsible person can simply point out a distasteful question. The examples constantly given reflect more the mindset and cultural awareness of small children and much older buffoons and idiots. For who we have always had obvious and quite competent ways of dealing with. And finally: why is it that no person of any age, type, background, persuasion, culture, gender race, sexuality, or any other identified or identifiable category cannot ever, it seems, counteract against an accusation of micro aggression by merely pointing out that they have been aggressed upon themselves? Who drew first in this "gunfight?" We might civilly discuss amongst ourselves how this all works with reasonably well-educated grown up adult people,, well versed and well-trained in the fine arts of socially mobile and adept competencies in diplomacy and sensitivity to others. To expect mere children to have this down is an absolute outrage against the natural evolution of normal human beings attempting to grow up in what is assumed to be a free state. They're children, for heaven's sake. Looking to the supposed elders and betters for guidance, forgiveness, understanding, compassion, in positions of trust which are not automatically bestowed or given out without some form of vetting and screening. Unless of course, a fair number of those supposed elders and betters are hotwired into some kind of love affair with exercising rare breeds and forms of micro aggressions all of their own design and fashion - with impunity.
PLEASE keep going. As a male, hearing you be authentically perceptive about this topic gives me enormous hope at a time when modern feminism and wokism have intersected to create this hyper fragility and self entitlement in every human interaction. Brava. Keep going!
I'm a male also, and glad you made the distinction of mentioning modern feminism. I don't know as much about it as I did in the earlier, simpler days of feminism in the 70s, when their priorities were the equality of women socially, politically, and in the workshop--something that most people would want for their mothers, daughters, and significant others. But now the movement may be different.
@@azmike3572 It was a lot better earlier on, but there was still stuff like, 1) Make women into Priests and 2) Let women be as sexually promiscuous as men
The thing that drives me nuts is that being anti CRT has to be conflated with Conservatism when logically CRT is not a good idea and should be contested by all political groups.
Well, that's because conservatives aren't canceled for criticizing CRT. I agree that CRT is anti-liberal and regressive, and *should* be criticized from the left, as well as from the right.
@@mattm4610 The "legal" version of CRT is taught in law schools. Children, in schools where there is emphasis on DEI and taught by committed SJWs, learn that if white, they are the oppressors, and if brown, they are the oppressed. I'm friends with a Latin family, whose 16 yr. old was told that he was oppressed at a public supported charter school. Believing his teacher, he asked his father, an immigrate, if Papa felt oppressed. The father, who has done quite well in this country through hard work, said NO! Now the kid distrusts wherever the teachers say as well as afraid to speak out or question because the CRT supporters do not indulge in discource.
I love this talk. As a traditional liberal, I find it so discouraging that basically only religious institutions are sponsoring this sort of thing though.
The people are on to CRT so they are just changing the name for it or saying it’s not being taught.. Its CRT no matter what!!! Don't let them play word games with you
Right! This is how we reduce all that silly stuff about "slavery" back to that one page, like when we grew up. And "civil rights" doesn't even merit mention, since everything we give them is something taken from us.
@@caribman10 Ridiculous comment. I don't know anyone who doesn't know that stuff, wasn't taught it and doesn't want it taught. There was always many lessons dedicated to this part of history. I don't know where you went to school. Try again.
I watched a lot of football last year. I wasn't keeping track, but it seemed like most of the unsportsmanlike conduct penalties were being given to black players. So I googled it and came up with an article that said that the last 27 or so ejections from pro football games were of black players. Its conclusion from that was that referees were systemically racist. The possibility that those black players deserved to be ejected due to their behavior wasn't mentioned.
@@FacePaster I politely challenged the idea of 'systemic racism' on a college campus and was escorted off the property by security for being 'threatening.' So F___K right off, gaslighter
Yes, it was a pleasant surprise ; ) When they scanned the panel, I did a double take and thought “that looks like JL!” Wish I had known and been there.
That's where they start , with the kids . Kids are so easily influenced and controlled mindwise . If they can get to the kids as they are growing up then it will stick with them and that will be the future .
Hi U of D, Thank you for this. I live in NYC. We live the poor outcomes of this crap. It is so corrosive here that criminals feel free and justified in killing cops here. Crying shame from a dry eye. The horizon is bleak
This comment doesn’t pass the smell test. If New Yorkers are anti-police, why did they elect a retired police captain as their mayor only months ago? And shouldn’t we all be concerned that people are being killed by the wrong kind of police simply because of the color of their skin?
great point about the human batteries, that was pretty stupid. Every dystopia like Terminator or _The Matrix_ suffers from this problem: humans are way more likely to dominate other groups of humans than machines are. Skynet and the Matrix are possible, but there will be malevolant humans and not machines behind the entire plot... it connects back to the main theme here: humans like to dominate one another, and a lot of the forced genuflection to woke theories is an exercise in the exertion of social dominance. Slavery and Jim Crow were the same thing, but with a different target. We need to guard against unjust forms of dominance, however they come.
The reason why I studied in UD from Bavaria coming, where the roots of liberal conservatism and related traditions exist and not the new world woke order which arises in Germany and also in US.
The woke ideology: “you must submit to our Cultural Competency program.” * sincerely asking someone where they’re from and about their family and ethnic background: *micro-aggression!*
We have been fighting this ideological and social shift for 40 years back when you had Christian Atheists who when asked do you believe in Heaven they would say Yes, what is that, that's all the good in the here and now ... do you believe in Hell, Yes what is that, that is all the good in the here and now. Using word with which men are familiar but in completely different senses.
@@relaxingsounds1386 They are. Just as they are infiltrated with people who believe 1 + 1 = 2, the Earth is a planet in a star system, and life on Earth evolves through the process of natural selection. What cheek!
54:40. 58:50 "The point of CRT is to make 'race' the central construct for understanding inequality" Gloria Ladson-Billings, Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education (1995)
Blame the wachowskis for looking down on their audience for the human batteries one. The original script had humans being used as processors for the matrix and the machines.
a good panel, Lindsey is pretty smart. I think these people should also be giving some talks about how actual racism does still exist and how to combat it... hint, it's not CRT.
They’d be good at doing that too, but Critical Race Theorists might not like what they hear. CRT sounds great in Theory, but in no way would it end up working in praxis. If you don’t believe me, then you should be pushing for its implementation more than anything else. Let’s run a simulation. Or would that end up not being real CRT?
I agree this is the element that is typically missing and is what also allows pro-CRT ppl to call any criticism of CRT a dismissal of racism altogether. I think there would be more widespread support if they looked at actual examples of issues such as disparities in education (inner cities vs suburbs) and discussed proactive solutions.
"Race-ism," depending on how you define it, does not have to be so much combated as understood. There are different races, and they do differ on average in a range of traits. Noticing this is no vice, and pretending otherwise is no virtue.
Whites are allowed to have opinions on race too, and those opinions don't change just because you add a non-white, nor is race a predictor of intellectual views. So the subtext of your complaint, that diversity of races equals diversity of views, is false. Besides, these voices are the minority less power position, so it's fine for a Catholic group to put on a panel for the minority position.
Disappointed that UD not only did not inform alumni about this event, but that furthermore, no opposing view points were presented and no people of color were on the panel. How can UD claim to accept everyone, but then hold this event without any true discourse? This is also an affront to any students and professors of color on campus.
There _was_ a separate panel for the pro-CRT point of view though. Also, it doesn't matter what these people's skin color is. It's their ideas that matter. Unless by pointing out their skin color you mean to say that you had precluded the possibility that they might be correct? "How can UD claim to accept everyone...?" Interesting point, because to me it seems like you won't accept a panel if It's full of white people.
@@CatholicismRules Yes I did. Thanks for asking. Where is the separate view point? Can you link me to it? I think that if you are going to talk about a issue in which the subject matter involves people of color, it only makes sense to include them on the panel, particularly those that have an opposing view point.
I have searched UD's website, and the YT channel, no other lecs on CRT except for this one. Like I said, if you can give me evidence otherwise, it's appreciated.
@@deedeee6271 1. If I'm correct, the panel was run by the recently approved club (I haven't listened to either), and I suppose UD doesn't record those, whereas they do record guest lecturers, as expected. 2. I'm surprised you watched the panel given that your go-to argument seems to be that these people are white and therefore their opinions cannot be taken seriously unless a black person gives them a thumbs up. Guest lecture panels don't typically host opposing viewpoints. Typically, if you have a guest lecturer arguing for Virgil's salvation, you don't have another lecturer arguing against it. 3. Again, all that matters is a person's ideas. If you're going to say that a person's ideas are necessarily predicated on their race, then I think we just have a fundamental disagreement, because I think people are freer than that. If you want to argue that this panel should have included the opposition as well, sure, I honestly have no opinion on that -- it depends on what the panelists and the opposition think -- but I'm totally fine with that. But instead you prioritize color. You say that people of color should be included, and particularly people of color with opposing point of view. I'd say that the opposing point of view can be included, and that they can be people of color or white, men or women, etc. etc.
This term is just a new catch-all slur against liberals. It's utterly meaningless. It is more useful to think of it as a reflection of the biases and fears that so-called conservatives about people who reject their simplistic views. NOBODY uses this term who is a liberal. It's just a formulaic straw man that serves as a foil for shadow boxing goofballs who want to virtue signal about how reactionary they are. Quite frankly, I think anybody who seriously talks about it like it's some modern scourge is participating in a pathetic attempt at engineering a "crisis" that requires some fascist remedy
"anybody who...fascist remedy." Interesting take, cuz Conservatives think that's what CRT is all about: engineering a crisis by pretending that modern institutions are still racist and modern laws still discriminate and then introduce fascist remedies. Also, I've spoken with people who do use and prefer the word CRT, and I've even seen a local leader of Black Lives Matter use the word CRT (and wear a shirt with CRT written on it). Liberals definitely do use the term, despite what you might be reading on Buzzfeed. Talk with some actual liberals and you'll figure that out :)
@@CatholicismRules I do as well. Thing is, issues like CRT are trying to show that judging people solely on that is nearly impossible when there are systems in place that advantages one group of people of others consistently.
@@deedeee6271 Do you think that it is theoretically okay in some era where there are no such systems to have a panel with only white people, so long as they have opposing points of view? Also, I don't believe such systems exist, just for the record.
"Can I get a coffee?"
"No, we don't offer coffee. But I can get you a re-hydrated bean-derived caffeinated beverage, usually served hot. Do you want that black or black-adjacent?"
😂😂
Lol
The second speaker's brief mention of micro aggression:
She basically nails it - that anyone anywhere at any time and for any reason can declare themselves to have been aggressed upon by a person who may or may not have been aware of the impact.
This is a completely subjective response. Let me be clear. A thing that no-one appears to care about or suggest might offer greater clarity, could it or should it be examined in the light of objectively observed facts?
What gets lost in all of this mess, or appears to get lost in it - is the fact that the whole concept of a micro aggression (other than the weird fact that it seems to have replaced "macro" aggressions that have apparently become quite scarce) is that it is an easily and readily useful weaponized quick hit on anyone that the accuser does not like.
Again, for any reason, at any time in any place, and upon a mere whim.
We are such babies it seems, to think that this does not happen. Of course it happens. A reasonable socially adept and responsible person can simply point out a distasteful question. The examples constantly given reflect more the mindset and cultural awareness of small children and much older buffoons and idiots. For who we have always had obvious and quite competent ways of dealing with.
And finally: why is it that no person of any age, type, background, persuasion, culture, gender race, sexuality, or any other identified or identifiable category cannot ever, it seems, counteract against an accusation of micro aggression by merely pointing out that they have been aggressed upon themselves? Who drew first in this "gunfight?"
We might civilly discuss amongst ourselves how this all works with reasonably well-educated grown up adult people,, well versed and well-trained in the fine arts of socially mobile and adept competencies in diplomacy and sensitivity to others.
To expect mere children to have this down is an absolute outrage against the natural evolution of normal human beings attempting to grow up in what is assumed to be a free state. They're children, for heaven's sake. Looking to the supposed elders and betters for guidance, forgiveness, understanding, compassion, in positions of trust which are not automatically bestowed or given out without some form of vetting and screening.
Unless of course, a fair number of those supposed elders and betters are hotwired into some kind of love affair with exercising rare breeds and forms of micro aggressions all of their own design and fashion - with impunity.
..so easy to say when you have white privelege......
@@caribman10 I love the sarcasm. Those people who claim that kind of thing all the time are so weak.
Great rant.
It's a form of ideological bullying.
@@scratchpenny it's true it exists sometimes its in big ways sometimes in small ways
I wish I had known about this talk, I would have attended in person. This is very encouraging
Me too!!! I have watched many RUclips talks by Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose and they have shaped my thinking about CRT.
PLEASE keep going. As a male, hearing you be authentically perceptive about this topic gives me enormous hope at a time when modern feminism and wokism have intersected to create this hyper fragility and self entitlement in every human interaction. Brava. Keep going!
I'm a male also, and glad you made the distinction of mentioning modern feminism. I don't know as much about it as I did in the earlier, simpler days of feminism in the 70s, when their priorities were the equality of women socially, politically, and in the workshop--something that most people would want for their mothers, daughters, and significant others. But now the movement may be different.
@@azmike3572 It was a lot better earlier on, but there was still stuff like, 1) Make women into Priests and 2) Let women be as sexually promiscuous as men
Microaggression = "where are you from"
So somehow banning the utterance of that question enhances people's understanding of foreign cultures?
The thing that drives me nuts is that being anti CRT has to be conflated with Conservatism when logically CRT is not a good idea and should be contested by all political groups.
Absolutely. If for no other reason than the dishonest representation of its motivations.
It'e the 'progressive' part of me that is totally against the mutant CRT in schools.
Well, that's because conservatives aren't canceled for criticizing CRT. I agree that CRT is anti-liberal and regressive, and *should* be criticized from the left, as well as from the right.
Isn’t crt only taught in law school?
@@mattm4610 The "legal" version of CRT is taught in law schools. Children, in schools where there is emphasis on DEI and taught by committed SJWs, learn that if white, they are the oppressors, and if brown, they are the oppressed. I'm friends with a Latin family, whose 16 yr. old was told that he was oppressed at a public supported charter school. Believing his teacher, he asked his father, an immigrate, if Papa felt oppressed. The father, who has done quite well in this country through hard work, said NO! Now the kid distrusts wherever the teachers say as well as afraid to speak out or question because the CRT supporters do not indulge in discource.
I love this talk. As a traditional liberal,
I find it so discouraging that basically only religious institutions are sponsoring this sort of thing though.
Liberals are pretty bankrupt. I'm glad the religious are taking this on. SOmeone has to keep the discussion going.
@@therealtoni The USA was founded on liberalism. The left are rarely liberals anymore. It's the anti-liberals on both left and right who are bankrupt.
@@donjindra That's true. What was Liberalism would probably be MORE like Libertarianism now. And what is Liberalism now is more like socialism.
That’s because western values are Christian values. The left has given up on God altogether, and look what they’re doing now without God.
@@MythicalVigilante Western values are not Christian values. That's Christian propaganda. It's just as dangerous as CRT.
Excellent panel! Thank you for sharing the facts about the true nature and intent of CRT. Every parent needs to hear this!
The people are on to CRT so they are just changing the name for it or saying it’s not being taught.. Its CRT no matter what!!! Don't let them play word games with you
Is this a clan meeting 🤔
This! This! This! Is how we take it back; at the school and city level.
Right! This is how we reduce all that silly stuff about "slavery" back to that one page, like when we grew up. And "civil rights" doesn't even merit mention, since everything we give them is something taken from us.
@@caribman10 Ridiculous comment. I don't know anyone who doesn't know that stuff, wasn't taught it and doesn't want it taught. There was always many lessons dedicated to this part of history. I don't know where you went to school. Try again.
@@caribman10 worst attempts at amateur strawmen ever lol!! go back to mom's basement.
I watched a lot of football last year. I wasn't keeping track, but it seemed like most of the unsportsmanlike conduct penalties were being given to black players. So I googled it and came up with an article that said that the last 27 or so ejections from pro football games were of black players. Its conclusion from that was that referees were systemically racist. The possibility that those black players deserved to be ejected due to their behavior wasn't mentioned.
Great video. Thank you. Smart people discerning the truth.
lol 😂! translation: only people who confirm my bias, no one who disagrees with me or challenges my viewpoint
@@Boldylock That could very well be. I wouldn’t know because I’ve never actually met an adherent of CRT.
@@Boldylock could you give me a link to a video?
@@mattm4610 It’s a metaphor duck. Open your eyes.
@@FacePaster I politely challenged the idea of 'systemic racism' on a college campus and was escorted off the property by security for being 'threatening.' So F___K right off, gaslighter
Great talk. More and more please.
An exceptionally well educated panel of book burners. Children need to learn. These guys dont want them to learn the truth.
America is dying and its carcass is going to cause a terrible stench for the world.
Hit or miss but mostly hit. Also so glad to see James pop up that was a surprise
This panel could have used someone like Prof. Paul Gottfried, who has been a critic of CRT (and other left-wing nonsense) for decades.
Yes, it was a pleasant surprise ; ) When they scanned the panel, I did a double take and thought “that looks like JL!” Wish I had known and been there.
Hey what? They cut off the video before the Q&A. That's disappointing.
Wassup homies ! Shout out from the San Francisco Bay Area in Northern California 🇲🇽🇺🇲
That's where they start , with the kids . Kids are so easily influenced and controlled mindwise . If they can get to the kids as they are growing up then it will stick with them and that will be the future .
*"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." ~Lord Acton*
watching this the day after the 2022 elections turns it into a pretty dark comedy
transformative means "communism"
democracy means "communism"
justice means "communism"
Not even a token black person?
God speed James Lindsay. One of the most important men alive.
Hi U of D,
Thank you for this.
I live in NYC. We live the poor outcomes of this crap. It is so corrosive here that criminals feel free and justified in killing cops here.
Crying shame from a dry eye. The horizon is bleak
This comment doesn’t pass the smell test. If New Yorkers are anti-police, why did they elect a retired police captain as their mayor only months ago? And shouldn’t we all be concerned that people are being killed by the wrong kind of police simply because of the color of their skin?
great point about the human batteries, that was pretty stupid. Every dystopia like Terminator or _The Matrix_ suffers from this problem: humans are way more likely to dominate other groups of humans than machines are. Skynet and the Matrix are possible, but there will be malevolant humans and not machines behind the entire plot... it connects back to the main theme here: humans like to dominate one another, and a lot of the forced genuflection to woke theories is an exercise in the exertion of social dominance. Slavery and Jim Crow were the same thing, but with a different target. We need to guard against unjust forms of dominance, however they come.
yes. it's all about power.
"forced genuflection"....I call "white twerking"!
@@oaktowngrrl6809 I am trying to get that image out of my head, thank you very little
This was a good one by Lindsey.
*I have been following James Lindsey for several years. Wokeism must be resisted.*
The reason why I studied in UD from Bavaria coming, where the roots of liberal conservatism and related traditions exist and not the new world woke order which arises in Germany and also in US.
The woke ideology: “you must submit to our Cultural Competency program.”
* sincerely asking someone where they’re from and about their family and ethnic background: *micro-aggression!*
We have been fighting this ideological and social shift for 40 years back when you had Christian Atheists who when asked do you believe in Heaven they would say Yes, what is that, that's all the good in the here and now ... do you believe in Hell, Yes what is that, that is all the good in the here and now. Using word with which men are familiar but in completely different senses.
1:03
Great explanation of Marxism and how utopia is impossible to define in the positive. Hence why "wokeism" can only criticize our current society.
Not what I call the most balanced panel
It's balanced when you consider how most universities are completely infiltrated with CRT praxis.
@@relaxingsounds1386 They are. Just as they are infiltrated with people who believe 1 + 1 = 2, the Earth is a planet in a star system, and life on Earth evolves through the process of natural selection. What cheek!
:)
I love the term “wokeism” it is hilarious. I should be on this panel, frankly. -former professor
Fauci did lie, puppies did die... Ironically, I learned that on Twitter
54:40. 58:50 "The point of CRT is to make 'race' the central construct for understanding inequality"
Gloria Ladson-Billings, Toward a Critical Race Theory of Education (1995)
I don't do the wokey pokey, but this panel was cringe and woefully ignorant.
VOTE in the Midterms!
I live in John Beatty’s district with my husband and children. He is an extremist.
WOKE = Worked-up Over Knowledge & Equality
Blame the wachowskis for looking down on their audience for the human batteries one. The original script had humans being used as processors for the matrix and the machines.
Great! 👏
Dang i wish I’d have known!!
0:00
Off the jump just like my Calculus teacher lol
great presentation
Congrats.
a good panel, Lindsey is pretty smart. I think these people should also be giving some talks about how actual racism does still exist and how to combat it... hint, it's not CRT.
They’d be good at doing that too, but Critical Race Theorists might not like what they hear. CRT sounds great in Theory, but in no way would it end up working in praxis. If you don’t believe me, then you should be pushing for its implementation more than anything else. Let’s run a simulation. Or would that end up not being real CRT?
I agree this is the element that is typically missing and is what also allows pro-CRT ppl to call any criticism of CRT a dismissal of racism altogether.
I think there would be more widespread support if they looked at actual examples of issues such as disparities in education (inner cities vs suburbs) and discussed proactive solutions.
Racism like all flaws, will always exist, it's like obesity, or ignorance itself, but racism is a lesser evil than obesity and ignorance in this age
"Race-ism," depending on how you define it, does not have to be so much combated as understood. There are different races, and they do differ on average in a range of traits. Noticing this is no vice, and pretending otherwise is no virtue.
Lindsey isn't "pretty smart"; he's SUPER smart, the GURU when it comes to deconstructing the Marxist-FASCIST "religion" of Wokeism.
School is for learning to read , write , arithmetic , history , home economics, athletics NOT crt !
Wait - Isn’t racism integrated into our history? Do you agree with those who are trying to rewrite U.S. history and whitewash it?
These Roman's are not in lock step with their Chieftain.
How many books have you burned today Adolph?
The ones that distribute obscene materials to kids.
Which is a felony.
You're for that?
In the end CRT is universal slavery, with the state holding the chattel interest.
US Constitution .....Marxist???
1:15:00 duhG ! James describes DIE
Human batteries..hehe...soul batteries for their harvest.
Air Heads on school boards
Finally, a discussion around race including only white, suburban people!
Whites are allowed to have opinions on race too, and those opinions don't change just because you add a non-white, nor is race a predictor of intellectual views.
So the subtext of your complaint, that diversity of races equals diversity of views, is false. Besides, these voices are the minority less power position, so it's fine for a Catholic group to put on a panel for the minority position.
'muh huhwite people muh' lol!! go to a black housing project and see how many people know about this subject.
Just being honest.
I noticed that.
Disappointed that UD not only did not inform alumni about this event, but that furthermore, no opposing view points were presented and no people of color were on the panel. How can UD claim to accept everyone, but then hold this event without any true discourse? This is also an affront to any students and professors of color on campus.
There _was_ a separate panel for the pro-CRT point of view though. Also, it doesn't matter what these people's skin color is. It's their ideas that matter. Unless by pointing out their skin color you mean to say that you had precluded the possibility that they might be correct?
"How can UD claim to accept everyone...?"
Interesting point, because to me it seems like you won't accept a panel if It's full of white people.
Tell me, did you even listen to the panel?
@@CatholicismRules Yes I did. Thanks for asking. Where is the separate view point? Can you link me to it?
I think that if you are going to talk about a issue in which the subject matter involves people of color, it only makes sense to include them on the panel, particularly those that have an opposing view point.
I have searched UD's website, and the YT channel, no other lecs on CRT except for this one. Like I said, if you can give me evidence otherwise, it's appreciated.
@@deedeee6271
1. If I'm correct, the panel was run by the recently approved club (I haven't listened to either), and I suppose UD doesn't record those, whereas they do record guest lecturers, as expected.
2. I'm surprised you watched the panel given that your go-to argument seems to be that these people are white and therefore their opinions cannot be taken seriously unless a black person gives them a thumbs up.
Guest lecture panels don't typically host opposing viewpoints. Typically, if you have a guest lecturer arguing for Virgil's salvation, you don't have another lecturer arguing against it.
3. Again, all that matters is a person's ideas. If you're going to say that a person's ideas are necessarily predicated on their race, then I think we just have a fundamental disagreement, because I think people are freer than that. If you want to argue that this panel should have included the opposition as well, sure, I honestly have no opinion on that -- it depends on what the panelists and the opposition think -- but I'm totally fine with that.
But instead you prioritize color. You say that people of color should be included, and particularly people of color with opposing point of view. I'd say that the opposing point of view can be included, and that they can be people of color or white, men or women, etc. etc.
"ignoring the truth and making excuses for my ignorance and hate" -- there fixed the title for you.
@@Boldylock what a joke.
@@Boldylock LOL. you people don't deserve even a second look. i'd be amused if it wasn't obvious that you're trying to destroy all objectivity.
You sound like a religious zealot.
@@relaxingsounds1386 lol not even. CRT isn't even taught in schools anyway. this is just complete BS.
@@Boldylock he's just some spergy weirdo and his channel looks fake lol!!
This term is just a new catch-all slur against liberals. It's utterly meaningless. It is more useful to think of it as a reflection of the biases and fears that so-called conservatives about people who reject their simplistic views. NOBODY uses this term who is a liberal. It's just a formulaic straw man that serves as a foil for shadow boxing goofballs who want to virtue signal about how reactionary they are. Quite frankly, I think anybody who seriously talks about it like it's some modern scourge is participating in a pathetic attempt at engineering a "crisis" that requires some fascist remedy
"anybody who...fascist remedy."
Interesting take, cuz Conservatives think that's what CRT is all about: engineering a crisis by pretending that modern institutions are still racist and modern laws still discriminate and then introduce fascist remedies.
Also, I've spoken with people who do use and prefer the word CRT, and I've even seen a local leader of Black Lives Matter use the word CRT (and wear a shirt with CRT written on it). Liberals definitely do use the term, despite what you might be reading on Buzzfeed. Talk with some actual liberals and you'll figure that out :)
Identitarian leftist aren't liberal.
All white panelists?
Remember, content of character, not color of skin.
@@CatholicismRules I think you could care less about that. That's just my theory, you let me know.
@@deedeee6271 I care very much about the content of someone's character, because I'm a Conservative. How about you?
@@CatholicismRules I do as well. Thing is, issues like CRT are trying to show that judging people solely on that is nearly impossible when there are systems in place that advantages one group of people of others consistently.
@@deedeee6271 Do you think that it is theoretically okay in some era where there are no such systems to have a panel with only white people, so long as they have opposing points of view?
Also, I don't believe such systems exist, just for the record.